A Comparative Analysis of U.S. States and Other National/Regional EPR Frameworks
This table provides a comparison of EPR frameworks in the U.S., Canada, the UK, and
the EU. It highlights the differences in their legislative timelines and approaches,
and methods of enforcement. This global perspective is crucial for understanding the
context of the evolving EPR landscape in the U.S.
Criteria |
EU |
UK |
Switzerland |
Canada |
U.S. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year of Introduction of EPR as a law or policy | 1994, Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive1 | 1997, Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations2 | 1983, Federal Act on the Protection of the Environment3 |
1970, Beverage Container Recycling Programs4 | 1991, State policies and programs5 |
Key Legislations |
|
|
|
||
Key Enforcement Agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs) |
|
|
|
|
|
Producer Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
UH Texas Chemical Circularity Consortium