Difference between revisions of "STAC co Wiltshire"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''' Wiltshire '''  
 
''' Wiltshire '''  
  
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.  
+
*Abbott v Ticheborne
 +
*Alley v Kelway
 +
*Anstie v Pleddall
 +
*Chadderton v Webb and Saunders - Chadderton v Chadderton
 +
*Chafyn v Zouche
 +
*Cholles v Ferris
 +
*Cleverley v Wake
 +
*Codrington v Idolls and Chandler
 +
*Colley v Precey
 +
*Danvers v Long
 +
*Devises v Lever
 +
*Eves v Ingram, Maton and Style
 +
*Fisher v Bristow
 +
*Frye v Pledell
 +
*Hayter v Marwyn
 +
*Horsey v Ashley
 +
*Kebblewhite v Ashley
 +
*Keynes v Keynes
 +
*Keynell v Baker
 +
*Knowles v Dowse
 +
*Lytcott v Button
 +
*Malmesbury Corporation v Palmer
 +
*Martin v Sarten
 +
*Matthew v Legge
 +
*Mitchell v Kent
 +
*Monday v Drowse and Drawater
 +
*Myson, John
 +
*Norborne v Davies
 +
*Odye v Fenn
 +
*Pleddall v Garrett
 +
*Rythe v Snelgar
 +
*Sticklowe v Dick
 +
*Thynne v Paul, Smith, Wheeler
 +
*Almoner v Bower - Almoner v Heath - Almoner v Moggeridge
 +
*AG v Brouckner - AG v Fessard - AG v Jeffries - AG v Latham - AG v Pledall
 +
 
 +
''' NOTA BENE ''' - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.  
 +
 
 +
''' A '''
  
 
''' Abbott v Ticheborne '''
 
''' Abbott v Ticheborne '''
Line 16: Line 54:
 
*STAC 7/10/1 - TNA Note: Charge of falsifying depositions, etc
 
*STAC 7/10/1 - TNA Note: Charge of falsifying depositions, etc
 
*STAC 5/A5/35 - B A Dr Rn - Mich 32 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Anstie et Anne uxor v Gabriel Pleddal, Edmund Pannell, John Baldwyn et al
 
*STAC 5/A5/35 - B A Dr Rn - Mich 32 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Anstie et Anne uxor v Gabriel Pleddal, Edmund Pannell, John Baldwyn et al
*STAC 7/17/17 - - - - William Austie et al v Gabriel (?) Pledall  
+
*STAC 7/17/17 - - - Wiltshire - William Austie et al v Gabriel (?) Pledall  
*STAC 5/A37/12 - I - 33 Eliz - - William Anstye v George Pleadell  
+
*STAC 5/A37/12 - I - 33 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Anstye v George Pleadell  
*STAC 5/A56/17 - I D - 33 Eliz - - William Austie et al v Gabriel Pleadall  
+
*STAC 5/A56/17 - I D - 33 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Austie et al v Gabriel Pleadall  
*STAC 5/A20 /21 - I D - 33 Eliz - - William Anstye v William Baylye
+
*STAC 5/A20/21 - I D - 33 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Anstye v William Baylye
*STAC 5/A37/24 - I - - - William Anstie, Ann Anstie v Edmond Pennell
+
*STAC 5/A37/24 - I - - Wiltshire - William Anstie, Ann Anstie v Edmond Pennell
*STAC 5/A18 /10 - B A - 44 Eliz - - William Anstey et uxor v Sir Henry Baynton, John Gibson
+
*STAC 5/A53/4 - A - 33 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Austrey et uxor v John Balden et al  
*STAC 7/10/1 - - - - William Anstie et Anne uxor v Henry Baynton
+
*STAC 5/A20/27 - I D - 33 Eliz - Wiltshire - [blank] Anstye v John Baldon
*STAC 5/A53/4 - A - 33 Eliz - - William Austrey et uxor v John Balden et al  
+
*STAC 5/A20 /27 - I D - 33 Eliz - - [blank] Anstye v John Baldon
+
 
*see also [[STAC Anstey]]
 
*see also [[STAC Anstey]]
*
+
 
 
''' B '''  
 
''' B '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' C '''
 +
 
 
''' Cambridge Colleges '''  
 
''' Cambridge Colleges '''  
 
see also [[STAC Cambridge U]]  
 
see also [[STAC Cambridge U]]  
Line 39: Line 77:
 
''' Chadderton v Chadderton '''  
 
''' Chadderton v Chadderton '''  
 
*TNA Note: Liddiard Millicent etc: Forgery and perjury as to title deeds of the manor and of the chantry of Ramsbury, forcible entry. STAC 7/2/13  
 
*TNA Note: Liddiard Millicent etc: Forgery and perjury as to title deeds of the manor and of the chantry of Ramsbury, forcible entry. STAC 7/2/13  
*STAC 5/C8/22 - I - 7 Eliz - William Chaderton v Richard Bedall alias Dick Welshman, Thomas Chadderton et al  
+
*STAC 5/C8/22 - I - 7 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Richard Bedall alias Dick Welshman, Thomas Chadderton et al  
*STAC 5/C64/38 - I D - 9 Eliz - William Chaderton v James Altham
+
*STAC 5/C19/7 - B A Rn - 18 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chadderton v Thomas Chaderton, Henry Chaderton et al  
*STAC 5/C19/7 - B A Rn - 18 Eliz - William Chadderton v Thomas Chaderton, Henry Chaderton et al  
+
*STAC 5/C23/12 - I D - Mich 18/19 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v James Ford, William Saunders et al  
*STAC 5/C23/12 - I D - Mich 18/19 Eliz - William Chaderton v James Ford, William Saunders et al  
+
*STAC 5/C78/35 - Rn - 19 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Robert Mase
*STAC 5/C78/35 - Rn - 19 Eliz - William Chaderton v Robert Mase
+
*STAC 5/C60/2 - I D - 23 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Thomas Chaderton, Richard Bedvo alias Welighman
*STAC 5/C60/2 - I D - 23 Eliz - William Chaderton v Thomas Chaderton, Richard Bedvo alias Welighman
+
*STAC 5/C23/3 - I D - 23 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Gyles Chaderton et al  
*STAC 5/C23/3 - I D - 23 Eliz - William Chaderton v Gyles Chaderton et al  
+
*STAC 5/C26/8 - I D - 23 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Thomas Chaderton et al  
*STAC 5/C26/8 - I D - 23 Eliz - William Chaderton v Thomas Chaderton et al  
+
*STAC 5/C44/21 - I D - 23 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Henry Chaderton, William Chaderton  
*STAC 5/C44/21 - I D - 23 Eliz - William Chaderton v Henry Chaderton, William Chaderton  
+
*STAC 5/C50/39 - I - - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Giles Chaderton, William Gunter
*STAC 5/C50/39 - I - William Chaderton v Giles Chaderton, William Gunter
+
*STAC 5/C72/12 - I - - Wiltshire - William Chadderton v Thomas Chadderton
*STAC 5/C72/12 - I - William Chadderton v Thomas Chadderton
+
 
*STAC 7/2/13 - - - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Thomas Chaderton, Giles Chaderton, Gabriel Pledall, William Dane, et al
 
*STAC 7/2/13 - - - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Thomas Chaderton, Giles Chaderton, Gabriel Pledall, William Dane, et al
*STAC 5/C48/12 - B - 35 Eliz - William Chaderton v William Wade, William Butcher et al
 
*STAC 5/C79/22 - Rn - William Chaderton v William Saunders
 
*STAC 5/C45/4 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - William Chatterdon, John Heblewhite, Hatton Best v William Ritcheman alias Webbe, Michael Wade, William Chaderton Jr et al
 
 
*see also [[STAC Chadderton]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Chadderton]]  
  
Line 59: Line 93:
 
*TNA Note: Seizure of hounds etc. STAC 7/11/1
 
*TNA Note: Seizure of hounds etc. STAC 7/11/1
 
*STAC 5/C23/14 - I D - 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - Leonard Chaffyn v James Zowche, John Deverell et al  
 
*STAC 5/C23/14 - I D - 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - Leonard Chaffyn v James Zowche, John Deverell et al  
*STAC 5/C37/11 - B A - 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - Leonard Chafyn v Francis Zouche, Benjamin Hearne
+
*STAC 5/C37/11 - B A - 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - Leonard Chafyn v Francis Zouche, Benjamin Hearne
 
*STAC 7/11/1 - - - Wiltshire - Leonard Chafyn v Francis Zouche, Benjamin Heron, John Deverell, John Longyer
 
*STAC 7/11/1 - - - Wiltshire - Leonard Chafyn v Francis Zouche, Benjamin Heron, John Deverell, John Longyer
 
*see also [[STAC Chafyn]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Chafyn]]  
Line 66: Line 100:
 
*Depositions from Wiltshire & Glous - mention of undersheriffs and the court of common pleas. STAC 5/C14/4
 
*Depositions from Wiltshire & Glous - mention of undersheriffs and the court of common pleas. STAC 5/C14/4
 
*STAC 5/C14/4 - A Rr C I D - 32 Eliz - Wiltshire, Gloucestershire - Thomas Cholles v Antony Ferris, Richard Smith et al  
 
*STAC 5/C14/4 - A Rr C I D - 32 Eliz - Wiltshire, Gloucestershire - Thomas Cholles v Antony Ferris, Richard Smith et al  
*STAC 5/C49/15 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Cholls v Richard Smyth
+
*STAC 5/C49/15 - I D - 31 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Cholls v Richard Smyth
 
*see also [[STAC Cholles]]
 
*see also [[STAC Cholles]]
 +
 +
''' Cleverley v Wake ''' 
 +
*Rafe Cleverley/Cleverlye v William Wake, Thomas Tothe & John Bridges. Marlbrough, Wilts.(dk) STAC 5/C78/25
 +
*STAC 5/C78/25 - Rn - - Wiltshire - Raffe Cleverlye v John Bridges
 +
*STAC 5/C36/9 - B A - 21 Eliz - Wiltshire - Rauf Cleverley v William Wake, Thomas Tothe
 +
*STAC 5/C19/4 - I D - 21 Eliz - Wiltshire - Ralph Cleverlye v William Wake, Thomas Tothe
 +
*see also [[STAC Cleverley]]
  
 
''' Codrington v Idolls and Chandler '''  
 
''' Codrington v Idolls and Chandler '''  
 
*Simon Coddrynton esquire, in re land in the County of Wiltshire. STAC 5/C1/14
 
*Simon Coddrynton esquire, in re land in the County of Wiltshire. STAC 5/C1/14
*STAC 5/C9/16 -  B A - 26 Eliz - - Simon Coddington v John Idolls Jr, Robert Chandler, Thomas Nicholas et al  
+
*STAC 5/C9/16 -  B A - 26 Eliz - Wiltshire - Simon Coddington v John Idolls Jr, Robert Chandler, Thomas Nicholas et al  
*STAC 5/C39/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - - Simon Corrington v Robert Chandler, Richard Light et al  
+
*STAC 5/C39/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Wiltshire - Simon Corrington v Robert Chandler, Richard Light et al  
*STAC 5/C1/14 - I D - 27 Eliz - Wiltshire - Simon Coddrynton, Thomas Pointe v John Iddotts and Robert Chandlor  
+
*STAC 5/C1/14 - I D - 27 Eliz - Wiltshire - Simon Coddrynton, Thomas Pointe v John Iddotts, Robert Chandlor  
 
*see also [[STAC Codrington]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Codrington]]  
  
Line 79: Line 120:
 
*Land of the Bishop of Salisbury in Wiltshire. STAC 5/C3/13  
 
*Land of the Bishop of Salisbury in Wiltshire. STAC 5/C3/13  
 
*STAC 5/C3/13 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - Wiltshire - Roger Colley v Henry Precy et uxor, Samuel Precy, Richard Phillips, John Gifforde et al
 
*STAC 5/C3/13 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - Wiltshire - Roger Colley v Henry Precy et uxor, Samuel Precy, Richard Phillips, John Gifforde et al
*STAC 5/C63/3 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Roger Colley v Eleanor Precye, Samuel Precye, William Palmer et al
+
*STAC 5/C63/3 - I D - 25 Eliz - Wiltshire - Roger Colley v Eleanor Precye, Samuel Precye, William Palmer et al
 
*see also [[STAC Colley]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Colley]]  
 +
 +
''' D '''
  
 
''' Danvers v Long '''  
 
''' Danvers v Long '''  
Line 107: Line 150:
 
*STAC 5/D34/29 - B - 19 Eliz - Wiltshire - Mayor and Burgesses of Devises v John Lever, John Smith, Edward Haynes et al
 
*STAC 5/D34/29 - B - 19 Eliz - Wiltshire - Mayor and Burgesses of Devises v John Lever, John Smith, Edward Haynes et al
 
*see also [[STAC Devises]]
 
*see also [[STAC Devises]]
 +
 +
''' E '''
  
 
''' Eves v Ingram, Maton and Style '''
 
''' Eves v Ingram, Maton and Style '''
 
*William Eves of Imber co Wilts labourer. Falsification of the will of John Eves of Barwicke co Wiltshire nephew of William Eves. STAC 5/E1/30
 
*William Eves of Imber co Wilts labourer. Falsification of the will of John Eves of Barwicke co Wiltshire nephew of William Eves. STAC 5/E1/30
 
*STAC 5/E1/30 - B A - Easter 36 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Eves v Robert Ingram, John Maton, Nicholas Bungy, Elizabeth Style, Alice James
 
*STAC 5/E1/30 - B A - Easter 36 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Eves v Robert Ingram, John Maton, Nicholas Bungy, Elizabeth Style, Alice James
*STAC 5/E12/12 - I D - 36 Eliz - - William Eves v John Maton, Elizabeth Styles
+
*STAC 5/E12/12 - I D - 36 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Eves v John Maton, Elizabeth Styles
*STAC 5/E13/15 - Rn - 36 Eliz - - William Eves v John Maton, Elizabeth Styll
+
*STAC 5/E13/15 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Eves v John Maton, Elizabeth Styll
 
*see also [[STAC Eves]]
 
*see also [[STAC Eves]]
 +
 +
''' F '''
  
 
''' Fisher v Bristow '''
 
''' Fisher v Bristow '''
Line 119: Line 166:
 
*STAC 5/F2/7 - B A Rn - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Fisher v William Bristow Sr, William Bristow Jr, Anthony Bristow, Anthony Coleman, Thomas Smart et al
 
*STAC 5/F2/7 - B A Rn - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Fisher v William Bristow Sr, William Bristow Jr, Anthony Bristow, Anthony Coleman, Thomas Smart et al
 
*STAC 5/F1/29 - B - 9 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Fisher v William Bristowe, Antony Bristowe, Richard Grater, Robert Coleman, John Weaver et al
 
*STAC 5/F1/29 - B - 9 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Fisher v William Bristowe, Antony Bristowe, Richard Grater, Robert Coleman, John Weaver et al
*STAC 5/F5/32 - I D - 8 Eliz - - Thomas Fysher v William Brystowe Sr, William Brystowe Jr, Anthony Brystowe, Anthony Colman et al
+
*STAC 5/F5/32 - I D - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Fysher v William Brystowe Sr, William Brystowe Jr, Anthony Brystowe, Anthony Colman et al
 
*see also [[STAC Fisher]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Fisher]]  
  
Line 127: Line 174:
 
*STAC 5/F7/22 - I D - 9 Eliz - Wiltshire - Anthony Frye v John Pledell, Zachary Pledell et al
 
*STAC 5/F7/22 - I D - 9 Eliz - Wiltshire - Anthony Frye v John Pledell, Zachary Pledell et al
 
*see also [[STAC Fry]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Fry]]  
*
+
 
 
''' G '''  
 
''' G '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' H '''
 +
 
 
''' Hayter v Marwyn '''
 
''' Hayter v Marwyn '''
 
*TNA Note: East Knoyle: Forcible dispute as to the incumbency. STAC 7/12/30  
 
*TNA Note: East Knoyle: Forcible dispute as to the incumbency. STAC 7/12/30  
Line 143: Line 192:
 
*STAC 7/12/35 - - - Wiltshire - Bartholomew Horsey v Henry Asheley et al
 
*STAC 7/12/35 - - - Wiltshire - Bartholomew Horsey v Henry Asheley et al
 
*see also [[STAC Horsey]]
 
*see also [[STAC Horsey]]
*
+
 
''' IJ '''
+
''' I J '''
*
+
 
 +
''' K '''  
 +
 
 
''' Kebblewhite v Ashley '''
 
''' Kebblewhite v Ashley '''
 
*TNA Notes: Illegal arrest in the forest of Bradon. STAC 7/3/24
 
*TNA Notes: Illegal arrest in the forest of Bradon. STAC 7/3/24
Line 155: Line 206:
 
*John Keynes of Boxe, Wiltshire, freemason. One Thomas Keynes, your subjects uncle, in his lifetime seized of Hulberte House and land in Wiltshire. STAC 5/K1/2  
 
*John Keynes of Boxe, Wiltshire, freemason. One Thomas Keynes, your subjects uncle, in his lifetime seized of Hulberte House and land in Wiltshire. STAC 5/K1/2  
 
*STAC 5/K1/2 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Keynes v William Keynes, Osmond Bushnell, Thomas Malpass
 
*STAC 5/K1/2 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Keynes v William Keynes, Osmond Bushnell, Thomas Malpass
*STAC 5/K3/3 - I D - 40 Eliz - John Keynes v Osmunde Bushnell, William Keynes et al
+
*STAC 5/K3/3 - I D - 40 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Keynes v Osmunde Bushnell, William Keynes et al
 
*STAC 5/K4/21 - I D - 40 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Keynes v Thomas Malpas
 
*STAC 5/K4/21 - I D - 40 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Keynes v Thomas Malpas
 
*see also [[STAC Keyne]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Keyne]]  
Line 162: Line 213:
 
*Richard Keynell of Blandford Dorset wollendraper. Assaulted on his way to London at the Inn at the sign of the Tree Lions (propriotor called Crooke) In new Sarum in Co Wiltes. STAC 5/K8/20
 
*Richard Keynell of Blandford Dorset wollendraper. Assaulted on his way to London at the Inn at the sign of the Tree Lions (propriotor called Crooke) In new Sarum in Co Wiltes. STAC 5/K8/20
 
*STAC 5/K8/20 - B A Rn - 43 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Keynell v Robert Baker, John Croutch et al
 
*STAC 5/K8/20 - B A Rn - 43 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Keynell v Robert Baker, John Croutch et al
*STAC 5/K8/39 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Richard Keynell v Robert Baker, John Crouch et al
+
*STAC 5/K8/39 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Keynell v Robert Baker, John Crouch et al
*STAC 5/K3/26 - I D - 43 Eliz - Richard Kennell v Richard Baker, John Cruch et al
+
*STAC 5/K3/26 - I D - 43 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Kennell v Richard Baker, John Cruch et al
 
*see also [[STAC Keynell]]
 
*see also [[STAC Keynell]]
  
Line 170: Line 221:
 
*STAC 5/K2/2 - B A C - 36 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Knowles v Thomas Dowse, Edward Tucker, Thomas Drury et al
 
*STAC 5/K2/2 - B A C - 36 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Knowles v Thomas Dowse, Edward Tucker, Thomas Drury et al
 
*see also [[STAC Knollys]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Knollys]]  
 +
 +
''' L '''
  
 
''' Lytcott v Button '''  
 
''' Lytcott v Button '''  
 
*Marlebroughe in the county of Wilshire. STAC 5/L34/6
 
*Marlebroughe in the county of Wilshire. STAC 5/L34/6
*STAC 5/L8/23 - B A - 37 Eliz - Sir Christopher Lydcoate v William Button, Thomas Hampton et al
+
*STAC 5/L8/23 - B A - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Sir Christopher Lydcoate v William Button, Thomas Hampton et al
*STAC 5/L35/29 - I D - 38 Eliz - Sir Christopher Litcott v Henry Woodroffe
+
*STAC 5/L35/29 - I D - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Sir Christopher Litcott v Henry Woodroffe
*STAC 5/L18/13 - I D - 38 Eliz - Sir Christopher Lyttcot v John Lanffer, Christopher Twigge et al
+
*STAC 5/L18/13 - I D - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Sir Christopher Lyttcot v John Lanffer, Christopher Twigge et al
 
*STAC 5/L34/6 - I - - Wiltshire - Sir Christopher Lytcott v Timothy Hampton
 
*STAC 5/L34/6 - I - - Wiltshire - Sir Christopher Lytcott v Timothy Hampton
 
*see also [[STAC Litcott]]
 
*see also [[STAC Litcott]]
 +
 +
''' M '''
  
 
''' Malmesbury Corporation v Palmer '''
 
''' Malmesbury Corporation v Palmer '''
Line 185: Line 240:
 
''' Martin v Sarten '''
 
''' Martin v Sarten '''
 
*Depositions of ?Lyvias ?Snenton of Durrington co Wilts and of Richard Hunywell of Feldon co Wilts. STAC 5/M1/37  
 
*Depositions of ?Lyvias ?Snenton of Durrington co Wilts and of Richard Hunywell of Feldon co Wilts. STAC 5/M1/37  
*STAC 5/M53/40 - B A - 42 Eliz - Robert Martyn v Richard Honywell, Sylvas Sarten et al
+
*STAC 5/M53/40 - B A - 42 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Martyn v Richard Honywell, Sylvas Sarten et al
*STAC 5/M48/39 - I D - 42 Eliz - Robert Martyn v Richard Honywell, Libyas Sarten
+
*STAC 5/M48/39 - I D - 42 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Martyn v Richard Honywell, Libyas Sarten
*STAC 5/M34/18 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Robert Martyn v John Rowe, Richard Honywell et al
+
*STAC 5/M34/18 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Martyn v John Rowe, Richard Honywell et al
*STAC 5/M52/17 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Martyn v John Rewe, Robert Honywell
+
*STAC 5/M52/17 - I D - 41 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Martyn v John Rewe, Robert Honywell
*STAC 5/M22/9 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Robert Marten v Richard Hunywell, Lybias Surten
+
*STAC 5/M22/9 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Marten v Richard Hunywell, Lybias Surten
 
*STAC 5/M1/37 - D - 42 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Martin v Lybias Sureton  
 
*STAC 5/M1/37 - D - 42 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Martin v Lybias Sureton  
 
*see also [[STAC Martin]]
 
*see also [[STAC Martin]]
Line 196: Line 251:
 
*Edmonde Mathewe of Bullforde (Bulford) co Wilts gent. He complains of riotous armed fishing in his river. STAC 5/M1/16  
 
*Edmonde Mathewe of Bullforde (Bulford) co Wilts gent. He complains of riotous armed fishing in his river. STAC 5/M1/16  
 
*STAC 5/M1/16 - B A - Trin 26 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edmund Matthewe v William Legge, Hugh Cooper, Thomas Cooper, John Symes, Richard Marshman, Nicholas Symes, Thomas Hardinge, William Andros, Thomas Martin, Robert Martin Thomas Hedney, Robert Crooke, John Martin, Robert Dugo, John Harding, John Heade, Christopher Gosling, William Brown, Thomas Webb, John Wekes, William Eyre, John Day, Richard Burgesse, Nicholas Subden  
 
*STAC 5/M1/16 - B A - Trin 26 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edmund Matthewe v William Legge, Hugh Cooper, Thomas Cooper, John Symes, Richard Marshman, Nicholas Symes, Thomas Hardinge, William Andros, Thomas Martin, Robert Martin Thomas Hedney, Robert Crooke, John Martin, Robert Dugo, John Harding, John Heade, Christopher Gosling, William Brown, Thomas Webb, John Wekes, William Eyre, John Day, Richard Burgesse, Nicholas Subden  
*STAC 5/M48/33 - I D - 26 Eliz - Edmond Matthew v William Androes
+
*STAC 5/M48/33 - I D - 26 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edmond Matthew v William Androes
 
*see also [[STAC Matthew]]
 
*see also [[STAC Matthew]]
 +
 +
''' Mitchell v Kent '''
 +
*Interrogatories: to be ministered to [Nic]holas E[rin]gton gent late undersheriff of the County of [Wiltes ?] one of the defts to the Bill of Compl of Edwarde Michell. Whether did you . . . enter into the dwelling house of the said pl at Calston in the co of Wilts. Deposition: signed Nicholas Erington. STAC 5/M1/10
 +
*STAC 5/M2/29 - B A C I D - 31 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edward Mitchell v William Kent, Laurence Jones, Richard Jones, Hugh Jones, John Joyner et al
 +
*STAC 5/M38/4 - I D - 31 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edward Mychell v William Kent, Richard Jones et al
 +
*STAC 5/M22/26 - I D - 31 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edward Michell v Nicholas Evington, William Kente et al
 +
*STAC 5/M1/10 - I D - 27 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edward Michell v Nicholas Eryington
 +
*see also [[STAC Michell]]
  
 
''' Monday v Drowse and Drawater  '''
 
''' Monday v Drowse and Drawater  '''
Line 203: Line 266:
 
*Interrogatories to be ministered to Richard Dowse gent, John Drawater, Christian Monday, and others defts on behalf of Richard Monday Complt. Do you know the manor of Collingbourne Valence. Deposition John Drawater of the parish of Clerkenwell, Richard Dowse of Collingberne Ducis co Wilts. STAC 5/M1/13
 
*Interrogatories to be ministered to Richard Dowse gent, John Drawater, Christian Monday, and others defts on behalf of Richard Monday Complt. Do you know the manor of Collingbourne Valence. Deposition John Drawater of the parish of Clerkenwell, Richard Dowse of Collingberne Ducis co Wilts. STAC 5/M1/13
 
*STAC 5/M1/28 - B A - Mich 28 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Monday v John Drawater, Thomas Holeway, Humphrey Griffin, John Piper alias Batchellor  
 
*STAC 5/M1/28 - B A - Mich 28 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Monday v John Drawater, Thomas Holeway, Humphrey Griffin, John Piper alias Batchellor  
*STAC 5/M56/20 - I D - 29 Eliz - Richard Monday v John Piper, Humfry Griffin
+
*STAC 5/M56/20 - I D - 29 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Monday v John Piper, Humfry Griffin
*STAC 5/M22/38 - B A - 28 Eliz - Richard Mondeye v Richard Dowse, William Dereham et al
+
*STAC 5/M22/38 - B A - 28 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Mondeye v Richard Dowse, William Dereham et al
 
*STAC 5/M1/13 - I D - 28 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Monday v Richard Dowse, John Drawater, Christian Monday
 
*STAC 5/M1/13 - I D - 28 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Monday v Richard Dowse, John Drawater, Christian Monday
 
*see also [[STAC Monday]]
 
*see also [[STAC Monday]]
Line 210: Line 273:
 
''' Myson, John '''
 
''' Myson, John '''
 
*Interrogatories on behalf of John Myson complt against John Bott deft. Were you servant with Henrye Sherrington esquire shreve of the co of Wilts. Did you receive of George Myson 6s 8d. Did you procure George Myson an aquittance for the receipt thereof. Did you receive it for the use of John Bott. (And other money transactions).  Interrrogatories on behalf of John Bott.  Depositions taken at Chippenham co Wiltshire. STAC 5/M1/5
 
*Interrogatories on behalf of John Myson complt against John Bott deft. Were you servant with Henrye Sherrington esquire shreve of the co of Wilts. Did you receive of George Myson 6s 8d. Did you procure George Myson an aquittance for the receipt thereof. Did you receive it for the use of John Bott. (And other money transactions).  Interrrogatories on behalf of John Bott.  Depositions taken at Chippenham co Wiltshire. STAC 5/M1/5
*STAC 5/M4/34 - B A Rn - 15 Eliz - John Myson v John Bott, Asye Somers
+
*STAC 5/M4/34 - B A Rn - 15 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Myson v John Bott, Asye Somers
*STAC 5/M37/17 - I D - 15 Eliz - John Myson v James Botte
+
*STAC 5/M37/17 - I D - 15 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Myson v James Botte
*STAC 5/M7/4 - I D - 16 Eliz - John Myson v John Bott
+
*STAC 5/M7/4 - I D - 16 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Myson v John Bott
 
*STAC 5/M1/5 - C I D - 16 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Myson v John Bott
 
*STAC 5/M1/5 - C I D - 16 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Myson v John Bott
*STAC 5/M48/10 - I D - - John Myson v John Bott
+
*STAC 5/M48/10 - I D - - Wiltshire - John Myson v John Bott
 
*see also [[STAC Myson]]
 
*see also [[STAC Myson]]
 +
 +
''' N '''
  
 
''' Norborne v Davies '''
 
''' Norborne v Davies '''
*STAC 5/N16/36 - Rn - 38 Eliz - John Norbone v William Davies, Richard Carnell
+
*STAC 5/N16/36 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Norbone v William Davies, Richard Carnell
*STAC 5/N15/3 - I D - 37 Eliz - John Norborne v William Davies, Richard Carnell
+
*STAC 5/N15/3 - I D - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Norborne v William Davies, Richard Carnell
 
*STAC 5/N1/8 - B A - 27 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Norborne v William Davies, Richard Carnell  
 
*STAC 5/N1/8 - B A - 27 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Norborne v William Davies, Richard Carnell  
 
*see [[STAC Norborne]]
 
*see [[STAC Norborne]]
 +
 +
''' O '''
  
 
''' Odye v Fenn '''
 
''' Odye v Fenn '''
Line 228: Line 295:
 
*STAC 5/O9/13 - Rn - - Wiltshire - Richard Odye, Thomas Fenne v Robert Wayght, Thomas Pynnell.
 
*STAC 5/O9/13 - Rn - - Wiltshire - Richard Odye, Thomas Fenne v Robert Wayght, Thomas Pynnell.
 
*see also [[STAC Odey]]
 
*see also [[STAC Odey]]
*
+
 
 +
''' P '''
 +
 
 
''' Pleddall v Garrett '''
 
''' Pleddall v Garrett '''
 
*TNA Note: Liddiard Millicent: Assault arising out of dispute as to right of way. STAC 7/14/21
 
*TNA Note: Liddiard Millicent: Assault arising out of dispute as to right of way. STAC 7/14/21
*STAC 5/P6/34 - B - 7 Eliz - Zacharias Pleddall v William Garret et uxor, Henry Spackman, Oliver Pleddall, Edmund Pannell et al
+
*STAC 5/P6/34 - B - 7 Eliz - Wiltshire - Zacharias Pleddall v William Garret et uxor, Henry Spackman, Oliver Pleddall, Edmund Pannell et al
 
*STAC 7/14/21 - - - Wiltshire - Zachary Pledell, Thomas Wilshere v William Garrard, Oliver Pledell
 
*STAC 7/14/21 - - - Wiltshire - Zachary Pledell, Thomas Wilshere v William Garrard, Oliver Pledell
*STAC 5/P45/14 - B A Rn - 8 Eliz - Zachary Pleydell v Olyver Pledell, Adrian Frye et al
+
*STAC 5/P45/14 - B A Rn - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Zachary Pleydell v Olyver Pledell, Adrian Frye et al
*STAC 5/P41/27 - I D - 8 Eliz - Zachary Pledell, Margaret Pledell v Olyver Pledell, James Forster  
+
*STAC 5/P41/27 - I D - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Zachary Pledell, Margaret Pledell v Olyver Pledell, James Forster  
*STAC 5/P10/20 - I D - 8 Eliz - Zachary Plendell v John Brumsell
+
*STAC 5/P10/20 - I D - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Zachary Plendell v John Brumsell
*STAC 5/P50/19 - I D - 12 Eliz - Zachary Pledall v Thomas Orchard, William Garratt et al
+
*STAC 5/P50/19 - I D - 12 Eliz - Wiltshire - Zachary Pledall v Thomas Orchard, William Garratt et al
 
*see also [[STAC Pleydell]]
 
*see also [[STAC Pleydell]]
*
+
 
 
''' Q '''  
 
''' Q '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' R '''
 +
 
 
''' Rythe v Snelgar '''  
 
''' Rythe v Snelgar '''  
 
*TNA Note: Salisbury: Subornation of perjury as to the will of Thomas Chaffy deceased. Replication missing at transfer. STAC 7/5/7  
 
*TNA Note: Salisbury: Subornation of perjury as to the will of Thomas Chaffy deceased. Replication missing at transfer. STAC 7/5/7  
Line 246: Line 317:
 
*STAC 5/R36/9 - I D - 3 Eliz - Wiltshire - George Rythe v George Snelgar
 
*STAC 5/R36/9 - I D - 3 Eliz - Wiltshire - George Rythe v George Snelgar
 
*STAC 7/5/7 - - - Wiltshire - George Rithe v George Snelgar, Giles Estcourt, Robert Eyre, Lionel Tycheborne, Thomas Pennyngton
 
*STAC 7/5/7 - - - Wiltshire - George Rithe v George Snelgar, Giles Estcourt, Robert Eyre, Lionel Tycheborne, Thomas Pennyngton
*STAC 5/R33/31 - I D - 3 Eliz - George Rythe v Thomas Penyngton
+
*STAC 5/R33/31 - I D - 3 Eliz - Wiltshire - George Rythe v Thomas Penyngton
*STAC 5/R9/10 - I D - 2 Eliz - George Rithe v Richard Woodland
+
*STAC 5/R9/10 - I D - 2 Eliz - Wiltshire - George Rithe v Richard Woodland
 
*see also [[STAC Rithe]]
 
*see also [[STAC Rithe]]
 +
 +
''' S '''
  
 
''' Sticklowe v Dick '''
 
''' Sticklowe v Dick '''
Line 254: Line 327:
 
*STAC 7/5/12 - - - Wiltshire - John Sticklowe v William Dicke, William Reade, Robert Dicke
 
*STAC 7/5/12 - - - Wiltshire - John Sticklowe v William Dicke, William Reade, Robert Dicke
 
*see also [[STAC Sticklow]]
 
*see also [[STAC Sticklow]]
 +
 +
''' T '''
  
 
''' Thynne v Paul, Smith, Wheeler '''
 
''' Thynne v Paul, Smith, Wheeler '''
 
*TNA Note: Longleat: Hunting in the park. STAC 7/15/41  
 
*TNA Note: Longleat: Hunting in the park. STAC 7/15/41  
*STAC 5/T34/17 - I D - 40 Eliz - John Thynne v Adrian Pawl, William Smith
+
*STAC 5/T34/17 - I D - 40 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Thynne v Adrian Pawl, William Smith
*STAC 5/T35/37 - Rn - 40 Eliz - John Thynne v William Wheeler
+
*STAC 5/T35/37 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Thynne v William Wheeler
 
*STAC 7/15/41 - - - Wiltshire - John Thynne, v William Smyth, Adrian Paule, William Whelour, Michael Whelour
 
*STAC 7/15/41 - - - Wiltshire - John Thynne, v William Smyth, Adrian Paule, William Whelour, Michael Whelour
 
*see also [[STAC Thynne]]
 
*see also [[STAC Thynne]]
*
+
 
 
''' UV '''  
 
''' UV '''  
*
+
 
 
''' W '''  
 
''' W '''  
*
+
 
 
''' XYZ '''  
 
''' XYZ '''  
*
+
 
 
''' Almoner '''
 
''' Almoner '''
  
Line 291: Line 366:
 
*BL Harl 2143 f.7v. A High Sheriffe for retorning a Contrarie man for a Kt of the Parlyament that was not Chosen contrary to his oath & for executing his office without oath. Brouker Sheriffe of Wiltshire upon an Information against him att Mr Attutrneys suite. Convicted for that Contrarie to his oath truely to exercise his office & to retorne and serve her majesties writte to the uttermost of his Cunnunge did nevertheless upon a writt to him directed for Chuseinge of knights of the Parlyament retorned Sir John Thinn for one of the knights in steade of Sir George Penruddock Chosen by the Countrie at the hearinge of the Cause the deft to excuse his perjurie alledges hee was not sworne the which the Court the more misliked tot ake on him the office withour beeing sworne & Comitted him to the Fleete And Law: Inde that should have given him his oath was for his offence Comitted. Anno 1 Eliz fo. 61 et 64.
 
*BL Harl 2143 f.7v. A High Sheriffe for retorning a Contrarie man for a Kt of the Parlyament that was not Chosen contrary to his oath & for executing his office without oath. Brouker Sheriffe of Wiltshire upon an Information against him att Mr Attutrneys suite. Convicted for that Contrarie to his oath truely to exercise his office & to retorne and serve her majesties writte to the uttermost of his Cunnunge did nevertheless upon a writt to him directed for Chuseinge of knights of the Parlyament retorned Sir John Thinn for one of the knights in steade of Sir George Penruddock Chosen by the Countrie at the hearinge of the Cause the deft to excuse his perjurie alledges hee was not sworne the which the Court the more misliked tot ake on him the office withour beeing sworne & Comitted him to the Fleete And Law: Inde that should have given him his oath was for his offence Comitted. Anno 1 Eliz fo. 61 et 64.
 
*BL Harl 2143 f.7v. Brouker above written for makeing a false retorne and excerciseing the office without oath fyned at 200 li and a yeares imprisonment. STAC 5/A14/15
 
*BL Harl 2143 f.7v. Brouker above written for makeing a false retorne and excerciseing the office without oath fyned at 200 li and a yeares imprisonment. STAC 5/A14/15
*STAC 5/A14/15 - I D - 1 Eliz - - AG v [blank] Brouncker
+
*STAC 5/A14/15 - I D - 1 Eliz - Wiltshire - AG v [blank] Brouncker
 
*STAC 7/1/3 - - - Wiltshire - AG v Henry Brouncker
 
*STAC 7/1/3 - - - Wiltshire - AG v Henry Brouncker
 
*see also [[STAC Brouncker]]
 
*see also [[STAC Brouncker]]
Line 309: Line 384:
  
 
''' AG v Latham '''
 
''' AG v Latham '''
*STAC 5/A11/28 - A - 39 Eliz - AG v John Latham et al. Transcribed [[STAC 5/A11/28]]
+
*STAC 5/A11/28 - A - 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - AG v John Latham et al. Transcribed [[STAC 5/A11/28]]
 
*STAC 5/A3/31 - B - Trin 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - AG v John Latham, [blank] Thorpe, [blank] Furneys, [blank] Marshall. Transcribed [[STAC 5/A3/31]]
 
*STAC 5/A3/31 - B - Trin 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - AG v John Latham, [blank] Thorpe, [blank] Furneys, [blank] Marshall. Transcribed [[STAC 5/A3/31]]
 
*see also [[STAC Latham]]
 
*see also [[STAC Latham]]

Revision as of 07:14, 22 October 2016

Wiltshire

  • Abbott v Ticheborne
  • Alley v Kelway
  • Anstie v Pleddall
  • Chadderton v Webb and Saunders - Chadderton v Chadderton
  • Chafyn v Zouche
  • Cholles v Ferris
  • Cleverley v Wake
  • Codrington v Idolls and Chandler
  • Colley v Precey
  • Danvers v Long
  • Devises v Lever
  • Eves v Ingram, Maton and Style
  • Fisher v Bristow
  • Frye v Pledell
  • Hayter v Marwyn
  • Horsey v Ashley
  • Kebblewhite v Ashley
  • Keynes v Keynes
  • Keynell v Baker
  • Knowles v Dowse
  • Lytcott v Button
  • Malmesbury Corporation v Palmer
  • Martin v Sarten
  • Matthew v Legge
  • Mitchell v Kent
  • Monday v Drowse and Drawater
  • Myson, John
  • Norborne v Davies
  • Odye v Fenn
  • Pleddall v Garrett
  • Rythe v Snelgar
  • Sticklowe v Dick
  • Thynne v Paul, Smith, Wheeler
  • Almoner v Bower - Almoner v Heath - Almoner v Moggeridge
  • AG v Brouckner - AG v Fessard - AG v Jeffries - AG v Latham - AG v Pledall

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

A

Abbott v Ticheborne

  • Suit by John Abbott against Mary Graye widow in the consistory court for withholding rents of the parsonage of Semley co Wiltshire of which he was the farmer. Edwarde Tichebourne was a Proctor in that court. STAC 5/A52/10
  • STAC 5/A52/10 - B - - Wiltshire - John Abotte v Edward Ticheborne
  • see also STAC Abbott

Alley v Kelway

  • STAC 5/A52/3 - B - 10 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Allie, John Mynthorne, Anthony Chaper v Francis Kelway, George Thorpe, William Hollis et al
  • see also STAC Alley

Anstie v Pleddall

  • Wm Anstie and Anne his wife daughter and sole heir of Andrew Baynton late of Bromeham [Bromham] Wiltshire esquire. The Bill is detatched from the other docs. STAC 5/A5/35
  • STAC 7/10/1 - TNA Note: Charge of falsifying depositions, etc
  • STAC 5/A5/35 - B A Dr Rn - Mich 32 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Anstie et Anne uxor v Gabriel Pleddal, Edmund Pannell, John Baldwyn et al
  • STAC 7/17/17 - - - Wiltshire - William Austie et al v Gabriel (?) Pledall
  • STAC 5/A37/12 - I - 33 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Anstye v George Pleadell
  • STAC 5/A56/17 - I D - 33 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Austie et al v Gabriel Pleadall
  • STAC 5/A20/21 - I D - 33 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Anstye v William Baylye
  • STAC 5/A37/24 - I - - Wiltshire - William Anstie, Ann Anstie v Edmond Pennell
  • STAC 5/A53/4 - A - 33 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Austrey et uxor v John Balden et al
  • STAC 5/A20/27 - I D - 33 Eliz - Wiltshire - [blank] Anstye v John Baldon
  • see also STAC Anstey

B

C

Cambridge Colleges see also STAC Cambridge U

Chadderton v Webb and Saunders

  • Giles Chadeston gent v William Saunders of Lidiard in the Co of Wilts husbandman. In re a house at Lidiard. STAC 5/C1/1
  • STAC 5/C23/20 - B A - 23 Eliz - Wiltshire - Gyles Chaderton v William Webb, William Saunders, John Wright et al
  • STAC 5/C1/1 - I D - 23 Eliz - Wiltshire - Giles Chadeston v William Saunders

Chadderton v Chadderton

  • TNA Note: Liddiard Millicent etc: Forgery and perjury as to title deeds of the manor and of the chantry of Ramsbury, forcible entry. STAC 7/2/13
  • STAC 5/C8/22 - I - 7 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Richard Bedall alias Dick Welshman, Thomas Chadderton et al
  • STAC 5/C19/7 - B A Rn - 18 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chadderton v Thomas Chaderton, Henry Chaderton et al
  • STAC 5/C23/12 - I D - Mich 18/19 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v James Ford, William Saunders et al
  • STAC 5/C78/35 - Rn - 19 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Robert Mase
  • STAC 5/C60/2 - I D - 23 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Thomas Chaderton, Richard Bedvo alias Welighman
  • STAC 5/C23/3 - I D - 23 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Gyles Chaderton et al
  • STAC 5/C26/8 - I D - 23 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Thomas Chaderton et al
  • STAC 5/C44/21 - I D - 23 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Henry Chaderton, William Chaderton
  • STAC 5/C50/39 - I - - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Giles Chaderton, William Gunter
  • STAC 5/C72/12 - I - - Wiltshire - William Chadderton v Thomas Chadderton
  • STAC 7/2/13 - - - Wiltshire - William Chaderton v Thomas Chaderton, Giles Chaderton, Gabriel Pledall, William Dane, et al
  • see also STAC Chadderton

Chafyn v Zouche

  • TNA Note: Seizure of hounds etc. STAC 7/11/1
  • STAC 5/C23/14 - I D - 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - Leonard Chaffyn v James Zowche, John Deverell et al
  • STAC 5/C37/11 - B A - 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - Leonard Chafyn v Francis Zouche, Benjamin Hearne
  • STAC 7/11/1 - - - Wiltshire - Leonard Chafyn v Francis Zouche, Benjamin Heron, John Deverell, John Longyer
  • see also STAC Chafyn

Cholles v Ferris

  • Depositions from Wiltshire & Glous - mention of undersheriffs and the court of common pleas. STAC 5/C14/4
  • STAC 5/C14/4 - A Rr C I D - 32 Eliz - Wiltshire, Gloucestershire - Thomas Cholles v Antony Ferris, Richard Smith et al
  • STAC 5/C49/15 - I D - 31 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Cholls v Richard Smyth
  • see also STAC Cholles

Cleverley v Wake

  • Rafe Cleverley/Cleverlye v William Wake, Thomas Tothe & John Bridges. Marlbrough, Wilts.(dk) STAC 5/C78/25
  • STAC 5/C78/25 - Rn - - Wiltshire - Raffe Cleverlye v John Bridges
  • STAC 5/C36/9 - B A - 21 Eliz - Wiltshire - Rauf Cleverley v William Wake, Thomas Tothe
  • STAC 5/C19/4 - I D - 21 Eliz - Wiltshire - Ralph Cleverlye v William Wake, Thomas Tothe
  • see also STAC Cleverley

Codrington v Idolls and Chandler

  • Simon Coddrynton esquire, in re land in the County of Wiltshire. STAC 5/C1/14
  • STAC 5/C9/16 - B A - 26 Eliz - Wiltshire - Simon Coddington v John Idolls Jr, Robert Chandler, Thomas Nicholas et al
  • STAC 5/C39/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Wiltshire - Simon Corrington v Robert Chandler, Richard Light et al
  • STAC 5/C1/14 - I D - 27 Eliz - Wiltshire - Simon Coddrynton, Thomas Pointe v John Iddotts, Robert Chandlor
  • see also STAC Codrington

Colley v Precey

  • Land of the Bishop of Salisbury in Wiltshire. STAC 5/C3/13
  • STAC 5/C3/13 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - Wiltshire - Roger Colley v Henry Precy et uxor, Samuel Precy, Richard Phillips, John Gifforde et al
  • STAC 5/C63/3 - I D - 25 Eliz - Wiltshire - Roger Colley v Eleanor Precye, Samuel Precye, William Palmer et al
  • see also STAC Colley

D

Danvers v Long

  • Account of Lady Danvers v Sir Walter Longe, Mr Edmund Longe, Seallman, Bosse, Hawarden, Sewell & others (Wiltshire, riot etc 38 Eliz) in Les reportes del cases in Camera Stellata, 1593 to 1609 from the original ms. of John Hawarde edited by William Paley Baildon Published 1894, p. 49-52
  • STAC 5/D14/33 - B A Rr - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Lady Elizabeth Danvers v Sir Walter Long Edmund Long et al
  • STAC 5/D1/28 - Rn - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Dame Elizabeth Danvers v Sir Walter Long, John Stump, Richard Bishop, Thomas Rich et al
  • STAC 5/D12/16 - D C I - 36 Eliz - Wiltshire - Lady Elizabeth D'Anvers v Sir Walter Long et al
  • STAC 5/D7/32 - I D - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Elizabeth Lady Danvers v Thomas Adie, Nicholas Stockham et al
  • STAC 5/D7/38 - I D - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Elizabeth Lady Danvers v William Sellman, John Bosse et al
  • STAC 5/D21/1 - I D - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Dame Elizabeth Danvers v John Mathew
  • STAC 5/D17/14 - I D - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Lady Elizabeth Danvers v John Mathew et al
  • STAC 5/D12/13 - D - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Elizabeth Danvers v Walter Long
  • STAC 5/D38/23 - I D - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Lady Elizabeth Danvers v Richard Bishopp, William Selman et al
  • STAC 5/D37/19 - I D - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Lady Elizabeth Danvers v Sir Walter Longe et al
  • STAC 5/D18/1 - I D - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Lady Elizabeth Danvers v Sir Walter Long et al
  • STAC 5/D26/14 - I D - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Lady Elizabeth Danvers v Sir Walter Long et al
  • STAC 5/D31/12 - I D - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Lady Elizabeth Danvers v Sir Walter Long et al
  • STAC 5/D11/26 - I D - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Elizabeth Danvers v Thomas Bushopp, Edmund Long
  • STAC 5/D32/36 - I D - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Elizabeth Danvers v Thomas Shewell et al
  • STAC 5/D31/22 - I D - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Lady Elizabeth Danvers v Richard Bishoppe, William Sellman et al
  • STAC 5/D3/33 - A? - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Lady Danvers v Tenants of Christenmalford
  • STAC 5/E5/35 - B I D - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Tenants of Christenmalford v Lady Elizabeth D'Anvers
  • see also STAC Danvers

Devises v Lever

  • STAC 5/D34/29 - B - 19 Eliz - Wiltshire - Mayor and Burgesses of Devises v John Lever, John Smith, Edward Haynes et al
  • see also STAC Devises

E

Eves v Ingram, Maton and Style

  • William Eves of Imber co Wilts labourer. Falsification of the will of John Eves of Barwicke co Wiltshire nephew of William Eves. STAC 5/E1/30
  • STAC 5/E1/30 - B A - Easter 36 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Eves v Robert Ingram, John Maton, Nicholas Bungy, Elizabeth Style, Alice James
  • STAC 5/E12/12 - I D - 36 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Eves v John Maton, Elizabeth Styles
  • STAC 5/E13/15 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Wiltshire - William Eves v John Maton, Elizabeth Styll
  • see also STAC Eves

F

Fisher v Bristow

  • Thomas Fisher gent. In re land in Wiltshire. STAC 5/F2/7
  • STAC 5/F2/7 - B A Rn - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Fisher v William Bristow Sr, William Bristow Jr, Anthony Bristow, Anthony Coleman, Thomas Smart et al
  • STAC 5/F1/29 - B - 9 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Fisher v William Bristowe, Antony Bristowe, Richard Grater, Robert Coleman, John Weaver et al
  • STAC 5/F5/32 - I D - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Fysher v William Brystowe Sr, William Brystowe Jr, Anthony Brystowe, Anthony Colman et al
  • see also STAC Fisher

Frye v Pledell

  • Adrian Frye yeoman. John Pledell gent. of Midgehall. STAC 5/F3/9
  • STAC 5/F3/9 - B A Rn - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Adrian Frye v John Pledell, Zachary Pledell et uxor, William Dybbell et al.
  • STAC 5/F7/22 - I D - 9 Eliz - Wiltshire - Anthony Frye v John Pledell, Zachary Pledell et al
  • see also STAC Fry

G

H

Hayter v Marwyn

  • TNA Note: East Knoyle: Forcible dispute as to the incumbency. STAC 7/12/30
  • STAC 5/H78/24 - B C I D - 16 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Hayter v John Marogyn, Richard Brether et al
  • STAC 7/12/30 - - - Wiltshire - Thomas Haytour clericus v John Mervyn clericus, Richard Brether, Edward Clemente, alias Horseman, William Lawrence clericus et al
  • STAC 5/H4/22 - B - 15 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Hayter v John Marwyn, Philip Marwyn, Thomas Seymor, Richard Poton et al
  • STAC 5/H41/30 - I D - 15 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Hater v John Mavin, William Lawrence et al
  • see also STAC Hayter

Horsey v Ashley

  • TNA Note: Berwick St John: Forcible entry and assault. STAC 7/12/35
  • STAC 5/H33/34 - Rn - 26 Eliz - Wiltshire - Bartholemew Horsey v Henry Ashley et al
  • STAC 7/12/35 - - - Wiltshire - Bartholomew Horsey v Henry Asheley et al
  • see also STAC Horsey

I J

K

Kebblewhite v Ashley

  • TNA Notes: Illegal arrest in the forest of Bradon. STAC 7/3/24
  • STAC 7/3/24 - - - Wiltshire - John Keblewhite v Sir Anthony Aysheley et al
  • see also STAC Kebblewhite

Keynes v Keynes

  • Deposition of Thomas Malpass of Cossham Wiltshire weiver, inheritance dispute. STAC 5/K4/21
  • John Keynes of Boxe, Wiltshire, freemason. One Thomas Keynes, your subjects uncle, in his lifetime seized of Hulberte House and land in Wiltshire. STAC 5/K1/2
  • STAC 5/K1/2 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Keynes v William Keynes, Osmond Bushnell, Thomas Malpass
  • STAC 5/K3/3 - I D - 40 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Keynes v Osmunde Bushnell, William Keynes et al
  • STAC 5/K4/21 - I D - 40 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Keynes v Thomas Malpas
  • see also STAC Keyne

Keynell v Baker

  • Richard Keynell of Blandford Dorset wollendraper. Assaulted on his way to London at the Inn at the sign of the Tree Lions (propriotor called Crooke) In new Sarum in Co Wiltes. STAC 5/K8/20
  • STAC 5/K8/20 - B A Rn - 43 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Keynell v Robert Baker, John Croutch et al
  • STAC 5/K8/39 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Keynell v Robert Baker, John Crouch et al
  • STAC 5/K3/26 - I D - 43 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Kennell v Richard Baker, John Cruch et al
  • see also STAC Keynell

Knowles v Dowse

  • Thomas Knowles of London gent. Debt of £500. Claiming against an estate in Wilshire. STAC 5/K2/2
  • STAC 5/K2/2 - B A C - 36 Eliz - Wiltshire - Thomas Knowles v Thomas Dowse, Edward Tucker, Thomas Drury et al
  • see also STAC Knollys

L

Lytcott v Button

  • Marlebroughe in the county of Wilshire. STAC 5/L34/6
  • STAC 5/L8/23 - B A - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Sir Christopher Lydcoate v William Button, Thomas Hampton et al
  • STAC 5/L35/29 - I D - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Sir Christopher Litcott v Henry Woodroffe
  • STAC 5/L18/13 - I D - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Sir Christopher Lyttcot v John Lanffer, Christopher Twigge et al
  • STAC 5/L34/6 - I - - Wiltshire - Sir Christopher Lytcott v Timothy Hampton
  • see also STAC Litcott

M

Malmesbury Corporation v Palmer

  • STAC 5/M47/16 - I D - 5 Jac - Wiltshire - Burgesses of Malmesbury v Henry Palmer, William Edwards
  • see also STAC Malmesbury

Martin v Sarten

  • Depositions of ?Lyvias ?Snenton of Durrington co Wilts and of Richard Hunywell of Feldon co Wilts. STAC 5/M1/37
  • STAC 5/M53/40 - B A - 42 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Martyn v Richard Honywell, Sylvas Sarten et al
  • STAC 5/M48/39 - I D - 42 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Martyn v Richard Honywell, Libyas Sarten
  • STAC 5/M34/18 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Martyn v John Rowe, Richard Honywell et al
  • STAC 5/M52/17 - I D - 41 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Martyn v John Rewe, Robert Honywell
  • STAC 5/M22/9 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Marten v Richard Hunywell, Lybias Surten
  • STAC 5/M1/37 - D - 42 Eliz - Wiltshire - Robert Martin v Lybias Sureton
  • see also STAC Martin

Matthew v Legge

  • Edmonde Mathewe of Bullforde (Bulford) co Wilts gent. He complains of riotous armed fishing in his river. STAC 5/M1/16
  • STAC 5/M1/16 - B A - Trin 26 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edmund Matthewe v William Legge, Hugh Cooper, Thomas Cooper, John Symes, Richard Marshman, Nicholas Symes, Thomas Hardinge, William Andros, Thomas Martin, Robert Martin Thomas Hedney, Robert Crooke, John Martin, Robert Dugo, John Harding, John Heade, Christopher Gosling, William Brown, Thomas Webb, John Wekes, William Eyre, John Day, Richard Burgesse, Nicholas Subden
  • STAC 5/M48/33 - I D - 26 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edmond Matthew v William Androes
  • see also STAC Matthew

Mitchell v Kent

  • Interrogatories: to be ministered to [Nic]holas E[rin]gton gent late undersheriff of the County of [Wiltes ?] one of the defts to the Bill of Compl of Edwarde Michell. Whether did you . . . enter into the dwelling house of the said pl at Calston in the co of Wilts. Deposition: signed Nicholas Erington. STAC 5/M1/10
  • STAC 5/M2/29 - B A C I D - 31 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edward Mitchell v William Kent, Laurence Jones, Richard Jones, Hugh Jones, John Joyner et al
  • STAC 5/M38/4 - I D - 31 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edward Mychell v William Kent, Richard Jones et al
  • STAC 5/M22/26 - I D - 31 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edward Michell v Nicholas Evington, William Kente et al
  • STAC 5/M1/10 - I D - 27 Eliz - Wiltshire - Edward Michell v Nicholas Eryington
  • see also STAC Michell

Monday v Drowse and Drawater

  • Bill of Richard Monday of Collingeborne Kingston co Wilts yeoman. In re land in the Manor of Collingborne.
  • Interrogatories to be ministered to Richard Dowse gent, John Drawater, Christian Monday, and others defts on behalf of Richard Monday Complt. Do you know the manor of Collingbourne Valence. Deposition John Drawater of the parish of Clerkenwell, Richard Dowse of Collingberne Ducis co Wilts. STAC 5/M1/13
  • STAC 5/M1/28 - B A - Mich 28 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Monday v John Drawater, Thomas Holeway, Humphrey Griffin, John Piper alias Batchellor
  • STAC 5/M56/20 - I D - 29 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Monday v John Piper, Humfry Griffin
  • STAC 5/M22/38 - B A - 28 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Mondeye v Richard Dowse, William Dereham et al
  • STAC 5/M1/13 - I D - 28 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Monday v Richard Dowse, John Drawater, Christian Monday
  • see also STAC Monday

Myson, John

  • Interrogatories on behalf of John Myson complt against John Bott deft. Were you servant with Henrye Sherrington esquire shreve of the co of Wilts. Did you receive of George Myson 6s 8d. Did you procure George Myson an aquittance for the receipt thereof. Did you receive it for the use of John Bott. (And other money transactions). Interrrogatories on behalf of John Bott. Depositions taken at Chippenham co Wiltshire. STAC 5/M1/5
  • STAC 5/M4/34 - B A Rn - 15 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Myson v John Bott, Asye Somers
  • STAC 5/M37/17 - I D - 15 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Myson v James Botte
  • STAC 5/M7/4 - I D - 16 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Myson v John Bott
  • STAC 5/M1/5 - C I D - 16 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Myson v John Bott
  • STAC 5/M48/10 - I D - - Wiltshire - John Myson v John Bott
  • see also STAC Myson

N

Norborne v Davies

  • STAC 5/N16/36 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Norbone v William Davies, Richard Carnell
  • STAC 5/N15/3 - I D - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Norborne v William Davies, Richard Carnell
  • STAC 5/N1/8 - B A - 27 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Norborne v William Davies, Richard Carnell
  • see STAC Norborne

O

Odye v Fenn

  • Bill: Richard Odye of Grettenham in Wiltshire, Thomas Fenne of Cyssetor in Co Glouc, capper. Land dispute, manor of Gretenham. STAC 5/O1/27
  • STAC 5/O1/27 - B A - Hil 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Odye, Thomas Fenne v Robert Wright, Thomas Pynnell
  • STAC 5/O9/13 - Rn - - Wiltshire - Richard Odye, Thomas Fenne v Robert Wayght, Thomas Pynnell.
  • see also STAC Odey

P

Pleddall v Garrett

  • TNA Note: Liddiard Millicent: Assault arising out of dispute as to right of way. STAC 7/14/21
  • STAC 5/P6/34 - B - 7 Eliz - Wiltshire - Zacharias Pleddall v William Garret et uxor, Henry Spackman, Oliver Pleddall, Edmund Pannell et al
  • STAC 7/14/21 - - - Wiltshire - Zachary Pledell, Thomas Wilshere v William Garrard, Oliver Pledell
  • STAC 5/P45/14 - B A Rn - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Zachary Pleydell v Olyver Pledell, Adrian Frye et al
  • STAC 5/P41/27 - I D - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Zachary Pledell, Margaret Pledell v Olyver Pledell, James Forster
  • STAC 5/P10/20 - I D - 8 Eliz - Wiltshire - Zachary Plendell v John Brumsell
  • STAC 5/P50/19 - I D - 12 Eliz - Wiltshire - Zachary Pledall v Thomas Orchard, William Garratt et al
  • see also STAC Pleydell

Q

R

Rythe v Snelgar

  • TNA Note: Salisbury: Subornation of perjury as to the will of Thomas Chaffy deceased. Replication missing at transfer. STAC 7/5/7
  • STAC 5/R26/14 - I D - 3 Eliz - Wiltshire - George Rythe v George Suelgan
  • STAC 5/R36/9 - I D - 3 Eliz - Wiltshire - George Rythe v George Snelgar
  • STAC 7/5/7 - - - Wiltshire - George Rithe v George Snelgar, Giles Estcourt, Robert Eyre, Lionel Tycheborne, Thomas Pennyngton
  • STAC 5/R33/31 - I D - 3 Eliz - Wiltshire - George Rythe v Thomas Penyngton
  • STAC 5/R9/10 - I D - 2 Eliz - Wiltshire - George Rithe v Richard Woodland
  • see also STAC Rithe

S

Sticklowe v Dick

  • TNA Note: Bishops Canning: Maintenance of first defts claim to a tenancy in the manor. STAC 7/5/12
  • STAC 7/5/12 - - - Wiltshire - John Sticklowe v William Dicke, William Reade, Robert Dicke
  • see also STAC Sticklow

T

Thynne v Paul, Smith, Wheeler

  • TNA Note: Longleat: Hunting in the park. STAC 7/15/41
  • STAC 5/T34/17 - I D - 40 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Thynne v Adrian Pawl, William Smith
  • STAC 5/T35/37 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Thynne v William Wheeler
  • STAC 7/15/41 - - - Wiltshire - John Thynne, v William Smyth, Adrian Paule, William Whelour, Michael Whelour
  • see also STAC Thynne

UV

W

XYZ

Almoner

Almoner v Bower

  • STAC 5/A6/11 - B - 35 Eliz - Wiltshire - Almoner v Robert Bower. Transcription STAC 5/A6/11
  • see also STAC Bower

Almoner v Heath

  • Whereas one Walter Brashard late of Wilton co Wiltshire Tallow chandler. felo de se. STAC 5/A59/10
  • STAC 5/A32/33 - B A - 38 Eliz - Wiltshire - Almoner v Thomas Heathe, Nicholas Wimbleton, Elizabeth Brashard et al
  • STAC 5/A59/10 - B - 43 Eliz - Wiltshire - Almoner v Thomas Heath, John Bulkeley, Ambrose Ringwood, Danyell Austen
  • see also STAC Heath

Almoner v Moggeridge

  • Whereas one Henry Carunt late of Wynterburne Sherburne [Winterbourne Sherbourne] Wiltshire . . . drowned himself in a narrow well. STAC 5/A5/3
  • STAC 5/A5/3 - B A - Trin 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - Almoner v John Mogredge et uxor, William Staples
  • see also STAC Moggeridge

Attorney General

AG v Brouckner

  • TNA Note: False election return. Henry Brouncker was sheriff of Wiltshire. STAC 7/1/3
  • BL Harl 2143 f.7v. A High Sheriffe for retorning a Contrarie man for a Kt of the Parlyament that was not Chosen contrary to his oath & for executing his office without oath. Brouker Sheriffe of Wiltshire upon an Information against him att Mr Attutrneys suite. Convicted for that Contrarie to his oath truely to exercise his office & to retorne and serve her majesties writte to the uttermost of his Cunnunge did nevertheless upon a writt to him directed for Chuseinge of knights of the Parlyament retorned Sir John Thinn for one of the knights in steade of Sir George Penruddock Chosen by the Countrie at the hearinge of the Cause the deft to excuse his perjurie alledges hee was not sworne the which the Court the more misliked tot ake on him the office withour beeing sworne & Comitted him to the Fleete And Law: Inde that should have given him his oath was for his offence Comitted. Anno 1 Eliz fo. 61 et 64.
  • BL Harl 2143 f.7v. Brouker above written for makeing a false retorne and excerciseing the office without oath fyned at 200 li and a yeares imprisonment. STAC 5/A14/15
  • STAC 5/A14/15 - I D - 1 Eliz - Wiltshire - AG v [blank] Brouncker
  • STAC 7/1/3 - - - Wiltshire - AG v Henry Brouncker
  • see also STAC Brouncker

AG v Fessard

  • Seditious words. STAC 5/A52/17
  • AG was Gilbert Gerrard 1559-1581
  • STAC 5/A52/17 - B - - Wiltshire - AG v Gyles Fessard, Walter Sherwood et al
  • see also STAC Fessard

AG v Jeffries

  • Witness Michael Vaughan, clerk rector of North Tidworth co Wiltshire. STAC 5/A38/26
  • STAC 5/A23/18 - B A - 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - AG v John Jeffries et al
  • STAC 5/A8/21 - I D - 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - AG v John Jeffris, Richard Shervele
  • STAC 5/A38/26 - I D - 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - AG v John Jeofferaye, Richard Sherfild
  • see also STAC Jeffries

AG v Latham

  • STAC 5/A11/28 - A - 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - AG v John Latham et al. Transcribed STAC 5/A11/28
  • STAC 5/A3/31 - B - Trin 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - AG v John Latham, [blank] Thorpe, [blank] Furneys, [blank] Marshall. Transcribed STAC 5/A3/31
  • see also STAC Latham

AG v Pledall

  • TNA Note: Frivolous indictments against justices of the peace for Wiltshire
  • STAC 7/1/21 - - - Wiltshire - AG (Gilbert Gerrarde) v Gabriel Pledall, Richard Barwyke, Robert Olyffe, et al
  • see also STAC Pleydell