Difference between revisions of "STAC co Oxford"

From Waalt
 
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
''' A '''  
 
''' A '''  
  
''' Alford v Lee '''  
+
''' Alford v Westby '''  
 
*STAC 5/A37/1 - B - - Oxfordshire - Francis Alforde v Francis Westbe
 
*STAC 5/A37/1 - B - - Oxfordshire - Francis Alforde v Francis Westbe
 
**Bill damaged. Francis Alforde of London, gent. Manor of Somertons in North Aston, Oxon. Lease from Willm Anne of [?Clisberrie?].(dk)
 
**Bill damaged. Francis Alforde of London, gent. Manor of Somertons in North Aston, Oxon. Lease from Willm Anne of [?Clisberrie?].(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/A35/20 - B A - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Francis Westbye
 +
*STAC 5/A8/26 - I D - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alforde v Francis Westbe
 +
**see also [[STAC Alford]]
 +
 +
''' Alford v Lee '''
 
*STAC 5/A32/32 - A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz -  Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee, Richard Awsten
 
*STAC 5/A32/32 - A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz -  Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee, Richard Awsten
 
*STAC 5/A52/20 - B A Rn - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee  
 
*STAC 5/A52/20 - B A Rn - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee  
 +
**Francis Alford of London gent. The Manor of Somertons in Oxfordshire
 
*STAC 5/A10/5 - I - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alforde v Richard Austen, Edward Lee
 
*STAC 5/A10/5 - I - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alforde v Richard Austen, Edward Lee
 
*STAC 5/A57/25 - D - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee
 
*STAC 5/A57/25 - D - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee
 
*STAC 5/A22/17 - A I D - 24 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee
 
*STAC 5/A22/17 - A I D - 24 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee
 
*STAC 5/A52/9 - B - 31 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee  
 
*STAC 5/A52/9 - B - 31 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee  
 +
**Top part of the Bill badly discoloured
 
*STAC 7/17/7 - - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee
 
*STAC 7/17/7 - - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee
 
**see also [[STAC Alford]]
 
**see also [[STAC Alford]]
  
 
''' B '''  
 
''' B '''  
 +
 +
''' Belson v Somester '''
 +
*STAC 5/B2/8 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Augustine Belson v John Somerster, Thomas Conisby, Henry Walpole, Wiliiam Crooke, Robert Boner
 +
**see TNA C 3/217/43  John Summaster. v Augustine Belson.  property in Aston, Oxfordshire. 1582 https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C3791705
 +
**see also [[STAC Belson]]
  
 
''' Berry or Bury v Nutting '''  
 
''' Berry or Bury v Nutting '''  
Line 31: Line 43:
 
''' Bewforreste v Bewforreste '''
 
''' Bewforreste v Bewforreste '''
 
*STAC 5/B26/34 - B - 6 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Alice Bewforreste v Luke Bewforreste
 
*STAC 5/B26/34 - B - 6 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Alice Bewforreste v Luke Bewforreste
 +
**Forcible entry (cm)
 
**See Legalism: Community and Justice. Fernanda Pirie, Judith Scheele.(dk)
 
**See Legalism: Community and Justice. Fernanda Pirie, Judith Scheele.(dk)
 
**see also [[STAC Beauforest]]
 
**see also [[STAC Beauforest]]
 +
 +
''' Brasenose College v Croker '''
 +
*STAC 5/H7/2 - B - 30 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Harryes et al Principal & Scholars of Brasen Nose College Oxon v John Croker, John Bonner Sr, John Bonner Jr, William Bonner
 +
**see TNA C 43/10/55 Principal and scholars of Brasenose Coll., Oxon, v Croker, Dormer, Hawthen and Bonner. Subject: Proceedings on recognizance of debt. Judgment. Cudlington alias Kidlington, manor, lands etc County: Oxon 29 Eliz. 
 +
**see also [[STAC Oxford U]]
 +
 +
''' Broome v Hore '''
 +
*STAC 5/B39/37 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - George Brome v Anthony Hore
 +
**Anthony Hore is of Hedington co Oxford. Interrogatories mention the Assizes at Oxford
 +
**see also [[STAC Broome]] where there are a lot of other connecting references.
 +
 +
''' Bryan v Cullen '''
 +
*STAC 5/B26/19 - B A - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v Richard Cullyn, Robert Ball et al
 +
**disputes arising from an earlier almoner's case re: a suicide (cm)
 +
*STAC 5/B12/18 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simond Bryon v Leonard Taylor
 +
*STAC 5/B18/34 - D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v Robert Inglefield
 +
*STAC 5/B36/18 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Bryan v Richard Cullyn, Francis Bradshaw, Michael Foster et al
 +
*STAC 5/B39/14 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Bryan v Richard Cullen et al
 +
**Deposition of Richard Cullen, then a prisoner.
 +
*STAC 5/B66/9 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Brian v Richard Inglefeild, Richard Cullin, Francis Bradshawe
 +
*STAC 5/B83/12 - D - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v William Higgins
 +
*STAC 7/18/69 - - - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v William Hyggens et al
 +
*STAC 5/B81/12 - D - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v William Higgins
 +
**see also [[STAC Bryan]]
  
 
''' Bryan v Cantfield '''
 
''' Bryan v Cantfield '''
 
*STAC 5/B33/4 - B A Dr - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Bryan v George Cantfirld, Richard Brown, Thomas Ravys et al
 
*STAC 5/B33/4 - B A Dr - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Bryan v George Cantfirld, Richard Brown, Thomas Ravys et al
 +
*STAC 5/B14/40 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v James Hussey et al
 
**Simon Bryan of the City of Oxford. Refs previous Star Chamber suit v Richard Cullyn sometime fellow of Magdalene College, Oxford & another Star Chamber suit v Cullyn & Alexander Hill, servant of Thomas Ravys. Also actions brought at Oxford Quarter Sessions in an attempt to force the abandonment of these previous suits.(dk)
 
**Simon Bryan of the City of Oxford. Refs previous Star Chamber suit v Richard Cullyn sometime fellow of Magdalene College, Oxford & another Star Chamber suit v Cullyn & Alexander Hill, servant of Thomas Ravys. Also actions brought at Oxford Quarter Sessions in an attempt to force the abandonment of these previous suits.(dk)
 
**see also [[STAC Bryan]]  
 
**see also [[STAC Bryan]]  
 +
 +
''' Bye v Archdett '''
 +
*STAC 5/B26/25 - B A Rn Rr - 23 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Bye v Mary Archdett, Anthony Fearne alias Vearne
 +
**forged lease (cm)
 +
**see also [[STAC Bye]]
  
 
''' C '''  
 
''' C '''  
 +
 +
''' Campden v Truman '''
 +
*STAC 5/C18/13 - B A - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Campden v John Truman, Matthew Hunt et al
 +
*STAC 5/C20/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Cambden v John Trumlin, Matthew Hunt et al
 +
**Oxfordshire
 +
*STAC 5/C57/27 - R - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Campler v Thomas Sturte, John Trueman et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Campden]]
 +
 +
''' Carleton v Lee '''
 +
*STAC 5/C74/36 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Anthony Carleton v Thomas Lee, Robert Lee
 +
*STAC 5/C10/15 -  I D - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Anthony Carleton v Bartholemew Pygott, Richard Lee, Robert Lee
 +
**Deponents: Bartholemew Pygott and Richard Lee of Whytfield, gent. and Robert Lee of Aston, gent.
 +
*STAC 5/C74/27 - I D - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Anthony Carleton v Bartholomew Pigott Richard Lee et al
 +
*STAC 5/C12/9 - I D - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Antony Carleton v Thomas Lee, Richard Surman
 +
**see also [[STAC Carlton]]
  
 
''' Carter v Hore '''
 
''' Carter v Hore '''
Line 59: Line 117:
 
''' Clement v Bewforest '''  
 
''' Clement v Bewforest '''  
 
*STAC 5/C3/14 - B A Rn C I D - 6 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Clement v Luke Bewforest, Roger French, John Spencer, Thomas Feachyld, Roger Brown et al
 
*STAC 5/C3/14 - B A Rn C I D - 6 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Clement v Luke Bewforest, Roger French, John Spencer, Thomas Feachyld, Roger Brown et al
**Copyhold in Dorchester [Dorchester on Thames], Oxfordshire.
+
**Copyhold in Dorchester [Dorchester on Thames], Oxfordshire. Legible Depositions.
 
**see also [[STAC Clement]]  
 
**see also [[STAC Clement]]  
  
 
''' Cole v Knight '''  
 
''' Cole v Knight '''  
 
*STAC 5/C81/2 - B - 12 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Coles v Richard Knight, Alexander Squire et al  
 
*STAC 5/C81/2 - B - 12 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Coles v Richard Knight, Alexander Squire et al  
 +
**also STAC 5/T7/17 [[STAC Taylor]]
 
*STAC 7/11/6 - - - Oxfordshire - John Cooles alias Taylor v Richard Knight, Alexander Squire, Thomas Rycottes, John Buckley et al  
 
*STAC 7/11/6 - - - Oxfordshire - John Cooles alias Taylor v Richard Knight, Alexander Squire, Thomas Rycottes, John Buckley et al  
 
**TNA Note: West Weald: Forcible dispute as to a house, etc.
 
**TNA Note: West Weald: Forcible dispute as to a house, etc.
Line 82: Line 141:
 
*STAC 5/C69/11 - A - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln  Robert Blower et al
 
*STAC 5/C69/11 - A - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln  Robert Blower et al
 
*STAC 5/C70/11 - A Rn C I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Christopher Cowley et al
 
*STAC 5/C70/11 - A Rn C I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Christopher Cowley et al
 +
*STAC 5/C71/8 - I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Croft v Roger Fullshaw
 
*STAC 5/C19/36 - B - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofte v Henry Earl of Lincolne, John Whitchcote et al  
 
*STAC 5/C19/36 - B - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofte v Henry Earl of Lincolne, John Whitchcote et al  
 
**see also [[STAC Croft]]
 
**see also [[STAC Croft]]
Line 92: Line 152:
 
''' D '''  
 
''' D '''  
  
''' Dawtrey v Barnard '''  
+
''' Dangerfield v Tidmarsh '''
*STAC 5/D36/40 - B D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v John Barnard, John Hayer et al
+
*STAC 5/D23/35 - B - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Dangerfeald v Robert Tidmarshe, John Rooke & John Tidmarshe
*STAC 5/D5/37 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrye v John Bernard
+
**see also [[STAC Dangerfield]] and Tidmarsh v Dangerfield below
**Interrogatories to be ministered to John Bernard, gent deft at the suit of William Dawtrey, gent complt, include: Do you know of a suit in Chancery against the said complt & Jane his wife in the name of Thomas Monncke concerning a supposed gift or grant made to Monncke by Thomas Deagle decd for 20 years of a messuage & lands in Westwell, Oxon, together with a stock of 200 sheep, 10 kine, 6 oxen etc. Have you at any time advised the said Monncke in the exhibiting of the said suit. Deponent 27 November Anno 40 Eliz: John Bernard, of Broade Risington, Gloucs, gent. (dk)
 
**see also [[STAC Dawtrey]]
 
 
 
''' Dawtrey v Monck '''
 
*STAC 5/D23/16 - B A C Rn - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v Thomas Mounck, Elizabeth Mounck, William Halywell, John Bernard et al
 
*STAC 5/D39/22 - A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v Thomas Monck et al
 
*STAC 5/D9/27 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtree v Thomas Monke et uxor
 
*STAC 5/D19/20 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v Thomas Beste
 
**Messuage at Westwell, Oxon. Interrs refer to suit in Chancery: Thomas Monncke v Willm Dawtrey & Joane his wife.(dk).
 
**see also [[STAC Dawtrey]] for more possible references
 
  
 
''' Danvers v Tasbrough '''
 
''' Danvers v Tasbrough '''
Line 132: Line 182:
 
**Deponent 14 January Anno 35 Eliz: Hercules Raynesford, of Mychell Town, Oxon, esquire, aged 66 (dk)
 
**Deponent 14 January Anno 35 Eliz: Hercules Raynesford, of Mychell Town, Oxon, esquire, aged 66 (dk)
 
*STAC 5/D16/21 - I D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasborough et al
 
*STAC 5/D16/21 - I D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasborough et al
 +
**Deponent from Oxon. Interrs refer to John Seymer & John Allen having deposed on behalf of Sir John Danvers in this court against Thomas Tasborough, and whether they have received inducements to recant their depositions. (dk)
 
*STAC 5/D13/27 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Danvers v Thomas Tasborroughe
 
*STAC 5/D13/27 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Danvers v Thomas Tasborroughe
 
*STAC 7/20/6 - - - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasboroughe et al
 
*STAC 7/20/6 - - - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasboroughe et al
Line 138: Line 189:
 
*STAC 5/D7/2 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John D'Anvers v John Hales
 
*STAC 5/D7/2 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John D'Anvers v John Hales
 
*STAC 5/D11/40 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v John Wayman, Robert Moore et al
 
*STAC 5/D11/40 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v John Wayman, Robert Moore et al
 +
**Interference with witnesses in the Star Chamber suit Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasboroughe and others. Interrogatories to John Waymann, Robert Moore, Robert Smythe & Roberte Ballard defts on behalf of Sir John Danvers. Depositions of the above. (dk)
 
**see also [[STAC Danvers]]
 
**see also [[STAC Danvers]]
 +
 +
''' Dawtrey v Barnard '''
 +
*STAC 5/D36/40 - B D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v John Barnard, John Hayer et al
 +
*STAC 5/D5/37 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrye v John Bernard
 +
**Interrogatories to be ministered to John Bernard, gent deft at the suit of William Dawtrey, gent complt, include: Do you know of a suit in Chancery against the said complt & Jane his wife in the name of Thomas Monncke concerning a supposed gift or grant made to Monncke by Thomas Deagle decd for 20 years of a messuage & lands in Westwell, Oxon, together with a stock of 200 sheep, 10 kine, 6 oxen etc. Have you at any time advised the said Monncke in the exhibiting of the said suit. Deponent 27 November Anno 40 Eliz: John Bernard, of Broade Risington, Gloucs, gent. (dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Dawtrey]]
 +
 +
''' Dawtrey v Monck '''
 +
*STAC 5/D23/16 - B A C Rn - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v Thomas Mounck, Elizabeth Mounck, William Halywell, John Bernard et al
 +
*STAC 5/D39/22 - A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v Thomas Monck et al
 +
*STAC 5/D9/27 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtree v Thomas Monke et uxor
 +
*STAC 5/D19/20 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v Thomas Beste
 +
**Messuage at Westwell, Oxon. Interrs refer to suit in Chancery: Thomas Monncke v Willm Dawtrey & Joane his wife.(dk).
 +
*STAC 5/D9/30 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrye v William Hollowaie alias Hallywell
 +
**see also [[STAC Dawtrey]]
  
 
''' Denton v Holton '''
 
''' Denton v Holton '''
Line 150: Line 217:
 
*STAC 5/D5/26 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Denton v James Kydder
 
*STAC 5/D5/26 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Denton v James Kydder
 
**Interrogatories only (dated May 1598) to be ministered to James Kydder gent deft to bill of William Denton complt, include: Did you or some other procure Edward Huffer, Robert Stimpson als Stimson, Thomas Mayes, Christopher Hixe, Henry Holton and John Beamonde that if, in your absence, William Denton should get possession of the manor of Somertons in Northaston, Oxon then they should regain possession for you. Were you privy to an entry into the said manor in riotous manner on 14 May Anno 37 Eliz (dk)
 
**Interrogatories only (dated May 1598) to be ministered to James Kydder gent deft to bill of William Denton complt, include: Did you or some other procure Edward Huffer, Robert Stimpson als Stimson, Thomas Mayes, Christopher Hixe, Henry Holton and John Beamonde that if, in your absence, William Denton should get possession of the manor of Somertons in Northaston, Oxon then they should regain possession for you. Were you privy to an entry into the said manor in riotous manner on 14 May Anno 37 Eliz (dk)
 +
*STAC 5/D1/2 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Denton v Henry Holton, Christopher Hixe et al
 +
**Deponents: Henry Holton, of Kyddlington on the Green, Oxon, glover, aged 50. Christopher Hix, of Wolvercote, Oxon, husbandman, aged 33. (dk)
 
**see also [[STAC Denton]]
 
**see also [[STAC Denton]]
  
Line 164: Line 233:
 
*STAC 5/D18/35 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Ralphe Doylie v William Powlson, William Westlie
 
*STAC 5/D18/35 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Ralphe Doylie v William Powlson, William Westlie
 
**see also [[STAC Doyley]]
 
**see also [[STAC Doyley]]
 +
 +
''' Duport v Dutton '''
 +
*STAC 5/D38/9 - B - 23 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Duport v Thomas Dutton, William Jackson et al
 +
*STAC 5/D34/33 - A R Rr - 23 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Duport v Thomas Dutton, John Mogg, William Bladen et al
 +
**Theft of cattle; Subornation. (cm)
 +
*STAC 5/D38/36 - I D - 24 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Duporte v Thomas Dutton et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Duport]]
  
 
''' E '''  
 
''' E '''  
Line 169: Line 245:
 
''' Edolph v Gardiner '''
 
''' Edolph v Gardiner '''
 
*STAC 5/E1/2 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 29 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symond Edolphe v Thomas Gardyner, John Wyse, William Carter, Thomas Ward
 
*STAC 5/E1/2 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 29 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symond Edolphe v Thomas Gardyner, John Wyse, William Carter, Thomas Ward
 +
**Bill dirty and incomplete. Possibly five sets of interrogatories. Some depositions and an abstract of depositions
 
**Adderbury parish tything customs Oxfordshire. Thomas Gardiner characterised as a vexatious litigant.
 
**Adderbury parish tything customs Oxfordshire. Thomas Gardiner characterised as a vexatious litigant.
 
**To the second he saith that he hath heard that he the said Thomas Gerdyner served wryttes of the Complainant and of one Page and one William Hall but of no others to his remembrance. To the third he saith that the said Thos Gerdyner overtakinge Burford Syse used these threatening wordes to this deponent As you are going to Burford against me and are Surveer of my Lande and hame but I will have A wrytt for you and plye the lawe with you.
 
**To the second he saith that he hath heard that he the said Thomas Gerdyner served wryttes of the Complainant and of one Page and one William Hall but of no others to his remembrance. To the third he saith that the said Thos Gerdyner overtakinge Burford Syse used these threatening wordes to this deponent As you are going to Burford against me and are Surveer of my Lande and hame but I will have A wrytt for you and plye the lawe with you.
Line 196: Line 273:
 
**John Fludde of Oxford haberdasher. Londoners trying to collect on a debt. Case in Common Pleas
 
**John Fludde of Oxford haberdasher. Londoners trying to collect on a debt. Case in Common Pleas
 
**see also [[STAC Fludd]]
 
**see also [[STAC Fludd]]
 +
 +
''' Floyd v Brown '''
 +
*STAC 5/F25/5 - I D - 27 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Floyd alias Lloyd v John Brown
 +
**Town of Oxford
 +
**see also [[STAC Floyd]]
  
 
''' Fryers v Silvester '''
 
''' Fryers v Silvester '''
Line 208: Line 290:
 
*STAC 5/F1/13 - I D C - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch, Richard Palmer, Edward Joyes, Thomas Everett
 
*STAC 5/F1/13 - I D C - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch, Richard Palmer, Edward Joyes, Thomas Everett
 
**Depositions taken at Burford. Deponents: Francis Hampson of Bradwell Oxon gent aged 27, John Potter of Ogborne St George co Wilts aged 60, Ambrose Mylles of Highworthe co Wilts woollen draper aged 42, Agnes Hall of Kencote co Oxon widow aged 76, John Grene of Kencote husbandman aged 40, Thomas Heynes of Kencote husbandman aged 56, Humphrey Hewlett of Kencote husbandman aged 50, Anthony H[ ]nlowe of Bradwell husbandman aged 60, Francis Taylor alias Sharye of Kencote husbandman aged 36
 
**Depositions taken at Burford. Deponents: Francis Hampson of Bradwell Oxon gent aged 27, John Potter of Ogborne St George co Wilts aged 60, Ambrose Mylles of Highworthe co Wilts woollen draper aged 42, Agnes Hall of Kencote co Oxon widow aged 76, John Grene of Kencote husbandman aged 40, Thomas Heynes of Kencote husbandman aged 56, Humphrey Hewlett of Kencote husbandman aged 50, Anthony H[ ]nlowe of Bradwell husbandman aged 60, Francis Taylor alias Sharye of Kencote husbandman aged 36
**see also [[STAC Fryer]]
+
**see also [[STAC Fryer]] see also Yate v Fryers
  
 
''' Fyfield v Bray '''
 
''' Fyfield v Bray '''
Line 215: Line 297:
  
 
''' G '''  
 
''' G '''  
 +
 +
''' Gadbury v Bowyer '''
 +
*STAC 5/G6/29 - B A Rn Rr - 13 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Gadburye v Drewe Gadburye, John Boyer, Alice Bennet, Edmond Gregory
 +
*STAC 5/G40/4 - I D - 13 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Gadburgh v John Bowyer
 +
**see also [[STAC Gadbury]]
 +
 +
''' Gadbury v Bowyer '''
 +
*STAC 5/G17/9 - I D - 17 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Gadbury v Edmund Gregory
 +
**First whether do you know that Cicely Gadbury was in her lifetime possessed of divers sheep pasture grounds and meads at Waterstock in the county of Oxford and if she were whether one John Boyer did buy the said sheep and her term of years in the said grounds and if you did then of whom. Deponent, Edmund Gregory of Cockesham [Cuxham] co Oxford husbondman.
 +
*STAC 5/G44/38 - I D - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Gadbury v John Boyer
 +
**see also [[STAC Gadbury]]
 +
 +
''' Gadbury v Bowyer '''
 +
*STAC 5/G14/26 - B A - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Gadburye v John Bowyer, James Bowyer, William Gadbury
 +
**see also [[STAC Gadbury]]
 +
 +
''' Gawain v Stone '''
 +
*STAC 5/G37/7 - B A Rr - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Gawyne v John Stone, Thomas Armstrong
 +
*STAC 5/G34/11 - A - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Gewen, Pentecost Leye v John Stone, Robert Stone, John Collin et al
 +
*STAC 5/G39/4 - I D - 24 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Gawine v John Stone
 +
*STAC 5/G45/6 - I D - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Gawyn v John Stone, Thomas Armstrong et al
 +
*STAC 5/G46/38 - Rr - - Oxfordshire - Thomas Gawen v John Stone, Thomas Armestrong
 +
*STAC 5/G45/37 - Rn - - Oxfordshire - Joan Gawine, Thomas Gawine v John Stone, James Hewishe
 +
**see STAC 2/26/446 Thomas Gawine v John Stone and Thomas Armstrong. Subornation of perjury (interrogatories only) Oxford
 +
**see also [[STAC Gawen]] and Stone v Gawain below
 +
 +
''' Gilkes v Bigge '''
 +
*STAC 5/G20/3 - B A - 42 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Robert Gilkes v Thomas Bigge v Richard Coxe
 +
**Riot, assault, trespass. Defendants took possession of the plaintiff's property with arms. Gilkes (yeoman) Deanes Bigge (wife of Thomas Bigge) Jane Cox (wife of Anthony Cox) Defendants answered not guilty. (mg)
 +
**see also [[STAC Gilkes]]
  
 
''' H '''  
 
''' H '''  
  
''' Hall, John '''
+
''' Hall v Good '''
 
*STAC 5/H27/27 - B A - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Hall v Nicholas Clark, John Good
 
*STAC 5/H27/27 - B A - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Hall v Nicholas Clark, John Good
 
*STAC 5/H49/31 - I D - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Hall v John Good, Nicholas Clerke
 
*STAC 5/H49/31 - I D - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Hall v John Good, Nicholas Clerke
Line 224: Line 336:
 
**Deponents: Thomas Haicock aged 64, Thomas Wynniard labourer, John Wyncle tailor aged 54 of Oxford. Thomas Gadburie of Kidlington Oxfordshire aged 76. William Lenthall of Latchford Oxfordshire aged 30 gentlemen. John Beall tailor aged 55, William Johnson joiner aged 50, Harry Pangburne aged 58, Thomas Belingame aged 56, William Richardson aged 55, labourers, of Great Halsey [Great Haseley] Oxfordshire. Thomas Newe of Little Hasley [Little Haseley] Oxfordshire husbandman aged 60. John Johnson of Tettesfourth [?Tetsworth] Oxfordshire husbandman aged 40. John Collins of New Inn Middlesex gentleman aged 32.  
 
**Deponents: Thomas Haicock aged 64, Thomas Wynniard labourer, John Wyncle tailor aged 54 of Oxford. Thomas Gadburie of Kidlington Oxfordshire aged 76. William Lenthall of Latchford Oxfordshire aged 30 gentlemen. John Beall tailor aged 55, William Johnson joiner aged 50, Harry Pangburne aged 58, Thomas Belingame aged 56, William Richardson aged 55, labourers, of Great Halsey [Great Haseley] Oxfordshire. Thomas Newe of Little Hasley [Little Haseley] Oxfordshire husbandman aged 60. John Johnson of Tettesfourth [?Tetsworth] Oxfordshire husbandman aged 40. John Collins of New Inn Middlesex gentleman aged 32.  
 
**see also [[STAC Hall]]
 
**see also [[STAC Hall]]
 +
 +
''' Hall v Rose '''
 +
*STAC 5/H5/16 - B A - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Agnes Hall v Robert Rose, John Atkyns
 +
**Bill (very faded) of Agnes Hall widow late wife of Thomas Hall of [    ] co Oxon yeoman. In re meadow land in the manor of Adderburye alias Gadburbie. Answer of Rose and Atkins
 +
*STAC 5/H46/28 - I D - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Agnes Hall v John Askins, Robert Rose
 +
**see also [[STAC Hall]]
 +
 +
''' Harcourt v Dudson '''
 +
*STAC 5/H42/15 - B A Rn Rr - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Harcourt v Oliver Dudson, William Powell
 +
**see also [[STAC Harcourt]] and Powell v Harcourt below
 +
 +
''' Holte v Kitchen '''
 +
*STAC 5/H17/10 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Holte v John Kitchin, Richard Howes et al
 +
*STAC 5/H19/1 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Holte v John Kitchin, Solomon Lambert et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Holt]] and see below Kitchin v Holte
 +
 +
''' Hore v Bury '''
 +
*STAC 5/H39/3 - B A Rn Rr I D - 11 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Hore v John Bury, Thomas Norrey et al
 +
**STAC 5/H39/3 cited in Norman L Jones, The birth of the Elizabethan Age: England in the 1560s, Wiley, 1995. Violent property dispute. Manor of Water Eaton, Oxon. (Text has the complt as Thomas Hare)
 +
*STAC 5/H39/27 - I D - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Hore v John Bury et al
 +
*STAC 5/H10/22 - C I D - 11 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Hore v John Bury et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Hore]] and [[STAC co Buckingham]] Bury v Hore
 +
 +
''' Hulmes v Reynolds '''
 +
*STAC 5/H26/16 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Richard Reynolds, Robert Starre et al
 +
*STAC 5/H77/32 - B A - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Richard Reignolds, John Templer et al
 +
*STAC 5/H10/1 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes v Richard Reynolds et al
 +
*STAC 5/H15/28 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes v Robert Starre, Simon Greene et al
 +
*STAC 5/H10/14 - I - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Houlmes, William Paxford v Robert Starre, Richard Reynolds
 +
*STAC 5/H10/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Thomas Templer alias Byrt, Thomas Hughs alias Colcot et al
 +
*STAC 7/23/48 - - - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes et al v William Paxford et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Hulmes]] and and Reynolds v Dutton below
  
 
''' I J '''  
 
''' I J '''  
Line 236: Line 380:
 
*STAC 5/J5/10 - C I - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Jervys v Robert Hallye, Augustin Rose et al
 
*STAC 5/J5/10 - C I - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Jervys v Robert Hallye, Augustin Rose et al
 
*STAC 5/J14/32 - I D - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Jarveis v Robert Haley, Augustine Rosse, John Clement
 
*STAC 5/J14/32 - I D - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Jarveis v Robert Haley, Augustine Rosse, John Clement
 +
*STAC 5/G6/31 - D - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Gervys v Augustine Roose et al
 
*STAC 7/13/2 - - - Oxfordshire - James Jarvies v Robert Haley et al
 
*STAC 7/13/2 - - - Oxfordshire - James Jarvies v Robert Haley et al
 
**TNA Note: Forcible ouster.
 
**TNA Note: Forcible ouster.
Line 253: Line 398:
 
**Deposition of Thomas Holte of Stoke Lysle  Oxfordshire.
 
**Deposition of Thomas Holte of Stoke Lysle  Oxfordshire.
 
*STAC 5/K8/29 - Rr - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Kitchin v Thomas Holk et al
 
*STAC 5/K8/29 - Rr - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Kitchin v Thomas Holk et al
**see also [[STAC Kitchin]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Kitchin]] and Holte v Kitchen above
  
 
''' Kent v Dubber '''
 
''' Kent v Dubber '''
Line 261: Line 406:
  
 
''' L '''  
 
''' L '''  
 +
 +
''' Lee v Hogan '''
 +
*STAC 5/L23/14 - B A Rn Rr - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Lee v Edmond Hogan
 +
*STAC 5/L24/11 - I D - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Lee v Edmond Hogan
 +
*STAC 5/L21/9 - I D - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Lea v Edmond Hogan
 +
*STAC 5/L13/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Lee v Edmund Hogan
 +
**see TNA C 2/Eliz/L5/45 Richard Lee esq. v Edmund Hogan and John Croker. Claim as assignee of leaseholds. The mansion or farm and manor of Hocknorton, otherwise Hogsnorton [Hook Norton], Oxfordshire, and the rectory and parsonage thereof, held under a lease from the bishop of Oxford.
 +
**see also [[STAC Lee]]
  
 
''' Earl of Lincoln v Croft '''  
 
''' Earl of Lincoln v Croft '''  
Line 308: Line 461:
 
''' Christ Church Cathedral Oxford v Marten '''
 
''' Christ Church Cathedral Oxford v Marten '''
 
*STAC 5/O8/8 - B A - 20 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Dean and Chapter of Christ Church Oxford, William Turner v Nicholas Marten, Matthew Rogers, Guy Light, Henry Lawrence, Henry Rogers et al.  
 
*STAC 5/O8/8 - B A - 20 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Dean and Chapter of Christ Church Oxford, William Turner v Nicholas Marten, Matthew Rogers, Guy Light, Henry Lawrence, Henry Rogers et al.  
 +
*STAC 5/C80/6 - Rn - Oxfordshire - Dean and Chapter of Christ Church, v Matthew Rogers, Henry Rogers, Guy Lighte
 
**see also [[STAC Oxford]]
 
**see also [[STAC Oxford]]
  
 
''' Christ Church Cathedral Oxford v President of Magdalen College '''
 
''' Christ Church Cathedral Oxford v President of Magdalen College '''
 
*STAC 5/O8/33 - Rn - - Oxfordshire - Dean and Chapter of Oxford v President of Magdalen Colledge, William Standishe et al.
 
*STAC 5/O8/33 - Rn - - Oxfordshire - Dean and Chapter of Oxford v President of Magdalen Colledge, William Standishe et al.
 +
**Repln of Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford to the answer of The President of Magdalen College in Oxford, William Standishe, Anthony Bustard & John Billyng. Close in Barforde, Oxon. (dk) - STAC 5/O8/33
 
**see also [[STAC Oxford]]
 
**see also [[STAC Oxford]]
  
Line 328: Line 483:
  
 
''' P '''  
 
''' P '''  
 +
 +
''' Pell v Mosden '''
 +
*STAC 5/P1/38 - B A Rn Rr - 8 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Pell v Edmund Ashfield, Richard Mosden, William Mosden, William Box
 +
*STAC 5/P16/34 - I D - 8 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Pell Sr v Edmund Ashfield
 +
*STAC 5/P49/28 - I D - - Oxfordshire - John Pell v Richard Mosden et al
 +
*STAC 5/P54/23 - I D - 8 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Pell v Richard Mosden
 +
**see also [[STAC Pell]]
  
 
''' Penyston v Whitton '''
 
''' Penyston v Whitton '''
Line 339: Line 501:
 
*STAC 7/4/29 - - - Oxfordshire - Thomas Peniston v John Asshfild et Anne uxor, Thomas Smith, John Osbaston, John Wacome, John Hawten et al
 
*STAC 7/4/29 - - - Oxfordshire - Thomas Peniston v John Asshfild et Anne uxor, Thomas Smith, John Osbaston, John Wacome, John Hawten et al
 
**see also [[STAC Peniston]]  
 
**see also [[STAC Peniston]]  
 +
 +
''' Penyston v Townshend '''
 +
*STAC 5/P4/18 - B A C I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Penniston v Peter Townsend et uxor, Richard Townsend, Annes Washley, Emy Gardner
 +
**Deponents: Charles Bowell of Ensham Oxfordshire baker-aged 19. Robert Lloyd of the University of Oxford Batchelor of Laws aged 32. Michael Marten of Ensham Oxfordshire yeoman aged 45. Henry Savage of Ensham Oxfordshire glover aged 60. Lawrence Heaton of Ensham Oxfordshire labourer aged 40. Robert Wawtlett of Ensham Oxfordshire baker aged 20. William Upperton of Ensham Oxfordshire labourer aged 20. William Costyne of Ensham Oxfordshire glover aged 54. Josias Pearce of Ensham Oxfordshire yeoman aged 30. William Devell - Ensham Oxfordshire baker aged 33. William Beeke of Ensham Oxfordshire husbandman aged 40 Samuell Watkins of Ensham Oxfordshire baker aged 21. William Cottrell of Ensham Oxfordshire tailor aged 40. Joane Turner of Ensham Oxfordshire widow and keeper of Richard Townsend in his sickness aged 60. Agnes Stiles of Ensham Oxfordshire wife of Edmund Stiles husbandman aged 50. John Bentley of the University of Oxford Doctor of Phisicke aged 48. Samuel Fletcher of Witney Oxfordshire husbandman aged 40 William Bust of the University of Oxford Master of Arts and practitioner of phisicke and chirurgerie aged 34. Legible deposiyions.
 +
*STAC 5/P63/25 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Penyston v Joan Townshend, Peter Townshend
 +
*STAC 5/P21/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Pennyston v Peter Townshend et uxor
 +
*STAC 5/P30/4 - I D - 37 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Penyston v Richard Townshend et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Peniston]]
 +
 +
''' Powell v Harcourt '''
 +
*STAC 5/P7/1 - B A Rn Rr Sr Rtr - 16 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Powel, tenants and copyholders of the Manor of Sutton Oxfordshire v Simon Harcourt, Robert Harcourt, Charles Griffin, Thomas Wood, Thomas Talbot et al
 +
*STAC 5/P58/27 - I D - 17 Eliz - Oxfordshire William Powell, William Tather et al v Symon Harronot et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Powell]] and Harcourt v Dudson above
 +
 +
''' Poole v Vines '''
 +
*STAC 5/P20/5 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - Oxford - Henry Poole v Ralph Vynes
 +
*STAC 5/P33/26 - I D - 29 Eliz - Oxford - Henry Poole v John Copland, Thomas Stephens et al
 +
*STAC 5/P52/8 - I D - 30 Eliz - Oxford - Henry Pole v Ralph Vines et al
 +
*STAC 5/P1/33 - B A Rn Rr - Easter 39 Eliz - Oxford - Henry Poole v Ralph Vyne, Thomas Stephens, William Ward, George Rideat et al
 +
*STAC 5/P9/15 - I D - 33 Eliz - Oxford - Henry Poole v Ralph Vynes et al
 +
**A coppice in Piddington Oxfordshire
 +
**see also [[STAC Poole]]
  
 
''' Q '''  
 
''' Q '''  
Line 351: Line 535:
 
*STAC 5/R5/24 - I D - 20 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Reynolds, Thomas Hewes v Thomas Dutton, William Paxford, Edward Vawdrye
 
*STAC 5/R5/24 - I D - 20 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Reynolds, Thomas Hewes v Thomas Dutton, William Paxford, Edward Vawdrye
 
**Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 38r. Misdemeanor done against the bailiff of a town endeavoring to keep the peace punished but not as a riot. Reynolde and Hews, bailiffs of Burford in Oxfordshire, plaintiffs; Holmes et al: for misdemeanor in them committed against the plaintiffs and the constable of the town in assaulting and reviling them coming to supress an affray by them committed in the same town at such time as a fair was kept there for which offence, time and place and persons of the plaintiffs considered they were fined and committed £10 and £40. Michaelmas 23 Elizabeth (kk)  
 
**Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 38r. Misdemeanor done against the bailiff of a town endeavoring to keep the peace punished but not as a riot. Reynolde and Hews, bailiffs of Burford in Oxfordshire, plaintiffs; Holmes et al: for misdemeanor in them committed against the plaintiffs and the constable of the town in assaulting and reviling them coming to supress an affray by them committed in the same town at such time as a fair was kept there for which offence, time and place and persons of the plaintiffs considered they were fined and committed £10 and £40. Michaelmas 23 Elizabeth (kk)  
**see also [[STAC Reynolds]]
+
**see also [[STAC Reynolds]] see also Hulmes v Reynolds above
  
 
''' Riley v Croker '''  
 
''' Riley v Croker '''  
Line 358: Line 542:
 
*STAC 5/R7/22 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Ryley v John Croker et al
 
*STAC 5/R7/22 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Ryley v John Croker et al
 
*STAC 7/14/38 - - - Oxfordshire - Richard Ryley v John Crocker, John Bonner, Robert Smith, John Pittam et al
 
*STAC 7/14/38 - - - Oxfordshire - Richard Ryley v John Crocker, John Bonner, Robert Smith, John Pittam et al
**TNA Note: Hook Norton: Assault on plaintiff's wife, and attack on his house.
+
**TNA Note: Hook Norton: Assault on plaintiff's wife, and attack on his house - STAC 7/14/38
 
**see also [[STAC Riley]]
 
**see also [[STAC Riley]]
  
Line 366: Line 550:
 
*STAC 5/S12/1 - B A C I D - 44 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Seacole v Richard Stokes, Robert Harrys et uxor, Michael Ashfield et al
 
*STAC 5/S12/1 - B A C I D - 44 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Seacole v Richard Stokes, Robert Harrys et uxor, Michael Ashfield et al
 
*STAC 7/15/19 - - - Oxfordshire - John Seacoll v Richard Stokes, Robert Harewood, Michael Ashfeild
 
*STAC 7/15/19 - - - Oxfordshire - John Seacoll v Richard Stokes, Robert Harewood, Michael Ashfeild
**TNA Note: Milton: Destruction of a furze-rick.
+
**TNA Note: Milton: Destruction of a furze-rick - STAC 7/15/19
 
*STAC 5/S69/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Seacole v James Bewley et al
 
*STAC 5/S69/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Seacole v James Bewley et al
 
**see also [[STAC Seacole]]  
 
**see also [[STAC Seacole]]  
Line 376: Line 560:
 
**Enclosed wood in Stokenchurche, Oxon.(dk)
 
**Enclosed wood in Stokenchurche, Oxon.(dk)
 
**see also [[STAC Scrope]]
 
**see also [[STAC Scrope]]
 +
 +
''' Sledd v Greene '''
 +
*STAC 5/S4/1 - B A - 43 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Sledd v William Greene, James Puresey, Richard Willmott, William Kirkby
 +
**Bill: torn ard part missing. Answer: Wm Greene esq. Answer: James Purefey. Answer: Ricd Wilmott. Answer: Wm Kirkby, Wm Durden, Thos Monday, Ricd Godfrey. Answer: John Howson clerk.
 +
**John Sledd clerk patronage of the vicarage of Milton under Deane Oxfordshire
 +
*STAC 5/S44/29 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Sled v William Greene, John Howson et al
 +
*STAC 5/S60/18 - I D - 43 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Sledd v John Howson
 +
*STAC 5/S13/15 - I D - 43 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Sledd v William Greene
 +
*STAC 5/S13/17 - I D - 43 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Sledd v William Kirbie, William Darden et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Sledd]]
 +
 +
''' Stone v Gawain '''
 +
*STAC 5/S69/8 - A Rn Rr - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Stone, Robert Stone v Thomas Gawine, John Bird et al
 +
*STAC 5/S24/6 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Stone, Robert Stone v Thomas Gawyn et uxor
 +
*STAC 5/S8/38 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Stone, Robert Stone v Walter Westmorland, Ralph White, Thomas Gawyn et al
 +
*STAC 5/S9/9 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Stone, Robert Stone v Elizabeth Banks, Thomas Finch et al
 +
**see STAC 2/26/446 Thomas Gawine v John Stone and Thomas Armstrong. Subornation of perjury (interrogatories only) Oxford
 +
**see also [[STAC Stone]] and Gawain v Stone above
 +
 +
''' Symmonds v Reynolds '''
 +
*STAC 5/S54/34 - B A - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Symmonds, John Hannes et al v Thomas Reynolds, Robert Hayter et al
 +
*STAC 5/S81/11 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Symonds, John Hannes et al v Thomas Reynolds, Robert Hayter
 +
**Symon Symmonds, John Hannes bailiffs of the town of Burford co Oxon. Internal dispute, assault on Bailiffs (with cudgels)
 +
**see also [[STAC Symonds]]
  
 
''' T '''  
 
''' T '''  
 +
 +
''' Taverner v Taverner '''
 +
*STAC 5/T19/27 - B A - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire  - Richard Taverner v Edmond Taverner, Thomas Badger
 +
*STAC 5/T12/38 - A - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Taverner v Peter Taverner et al
 +
*STAC 5/T25/14 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Taverner v Peter Tavener, Edmund Taverner, Thomas Badger et al
 +
*STAC 5/T39/8 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Taverner v Peter Taverner
 +
*STAC 5/T32/1 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Tavener v Robert Venton
 +
**STAC 5/T32/1 Interrs refer to the will of Richard Taverner the father, 5 deponents are all of Oxfordshire. (dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Taverner]]
 +
 +
''' Temple v Croker '''
 +
*STAC 5/T22/30 - B A - 29 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Temple, William Fryar v John Croker
 +
*STAC 5/T32/5 - I D - 29 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Temple, William Fryer v John Croker
 +
**see also [[STAC Temple]]
 +
 +
''' Tidmarsh v Dangerfield '''
 +
*STAC 5/T20/39 - B A - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Tydmarsh v Thomas Daungerfeld, William Foxe
 +
**John Tidmershe of Chadlington in co Oxford husbandman.  Lands in Chadlington. Embezzlement of a Charter.
 +
*STAC 5/T33/2 - B A I D - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Tidmersh v Thomas Dangerfeld
 +
*STAC 5/T26/6 - I D - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Tidmarshe v William Foxe, Edward Crofts et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Tidmarsh]] and Dangerfield v Tidmarsh above
  
 
''' Townshend v Peniston '''
 
''' Townshend v Peniston '''
Line 384: Line 613:
 
*STAC 5/T11/8 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Peter Townsend v Thomas Peneston, William Cottrell et al
 
*STAC 5/T11/8 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Peter Townsend v Thomas Peneston, William Cottrell et al
 
*STAC 7/30/37 - - - Oxfordshire - Peter Townsend v Thomas Peniston et al
 
*STAC 7/30/37 - - - Oxfordshire - Peter Townsend v Thomas Peniston et al
 +
*STAC 7/30/38 - D - 27 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Townesende v Thomas Peniston et al
 
**see also [[STAC Townshend]]
 
**see also [[STAC Townshend]]
  
Line 389: Line 619:
  
 
''' W '''  
 
''' W '''  
 +
 +
''' Whichcoste v Cocks '''
 +
*STAC 5/W60/40 - B Dr - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Whitchcoste, Thomas Cocks v Richard Dobson et al
 +
**see TNA C 2/Eliz/W13/30 Thomas Whitchott and Thomas Cooke. v Richard Dobson and Richard Feather. Claim by purchase. The manor of Wheatley [Oxfordshire] and a messuage and oxgang of land, parcel of the demesnes of the said manor, purchased by the plaintiffs; an acre of land called Gregg Roide Acre, belonging to the said oxgang, is also mentioned
 +
**see also [[STAC Whichcot]]
 +
 +
''' Whittington v Wenman '''
 +
*STAC 5/W30/16 - B Dr - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whittington v William Wenman, John Whytyng et al
 +
*STAC 5/W47/26 - B A - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whittington v William Wenman
 +
*STAC 5/W9/33 - I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whittington v William Whenman
 +
*STAC 5/W54/10 - Rr - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whittington v William Wenman, James Bullock et al
 +
*STAC 5/W19/38 - Rn - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whittingdon v William Wenman
 +
*STAC 5/W44/36 - D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whyttington v John Yeve
 +
**see E 133/7/937 The Queen and William Whittington v. William Wenman. A lease of the farm of Alvescot sold by William Wenman to William Whittington. Alleged fraud on the part of Wenman. A suit in Chancery brought by John Stocke against Whittington to recover possessionof the said farm. A suit in Chancery commenced by Wenman against Whittington, for not delivering up a bond, entered into by him, to the said Whittington, and alleged to be satisfied. An information of usury exhibited by him against Whittington. An action for debt brought by Whittington against Wenman. London & Oxon. 32/33 Eliz. and TNA E 133/7/938 and TNA E 133/7/939
 +
**see also [[STAC Whittington]]
  
 
''' Whytton v Ryley '''
 
''' Whytton v Ryley '''
 
*STAC 5/W1/8 - I D - 17 Eliz - Oxfordshire - George Whitton v William Ryley
 
*STAC 5/W1/8 - I D - 17 Eliz - Oxfordshire - George Whitton v William Ryley
 
*STAC 5/W3/15 - B A Rn Rr - 16 Eliz - Oxfordshire - George Wytton v William Ryley  
 
*STAC 5/W3/15 - B A Rn Rr - 16 Eliz - Oxfordshire - George Wytton v William Ryley  
**George Whitton of Woodstock co Oxon.
+
**George Whitton of Woodstock co Oxon - STAC 5/W3/15
 
**see also [[STAC Whitton]]
 
**see also [[STAC Whitton]]
  
Line 401: Line 646:
  
 
''' XYZ '''  
 
''' XYZ '''  
 +
 +
''' Yate v Blagrave '''
 +
*STAC 5/Y2/25 - B A I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, Richard Palmer v John Blagrave, William Reve et al
 +
**John Yate of Kencott, Oxon, James Hytche parson of Kencott & Richard Palmer of Kencott, yeoman. (dk)
 +
*STAC 5/Y3/13 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hitch et al v Edmond Fryers
 +
*STAC 5/Y1/27 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hytche, Richard Palmer v Edmond Fryers
 +
*STAC 5/Y2/17 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hitch et al v Edmond Friers, John Blagrave et al
 +
*STAC 5/Y1/40 - I D - 42 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate et al v Edmund Fryars et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Yate]]
 +
 +
''' Yate v Fryers '''
 +
*STAC 5/Y2/25 - B A I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, Richard Palmer v John Blagrave, William Reve et al
 +
*STAC 5/Y3/13 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hitch et al v Edmond Fryers
 +
*STAC 5/Y1/27 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hytche, Richard Palmer v Edmond Fryers
 +
*STAC 5/Y2/17 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hitch et al v Edmond Friers, John Blagrave et al
 +
*STAC 5/Y1/40 - I D - 42 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate et al v Edmund Fryars et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Yate]] see also Fryers v Yate
  
 
''' Almoner '''
 
''' Almoner '''
Line 407: Line 669:
 
*STAC 5/A38/14 - B A - - Oxfordshire - Almoner v John Baker, Thomas Webbe
 
*STAC 5/A38/14 - B A - - Oxfordshire - Almoner v John Baker, Thomas Webbe
 
**In re John Burley, late of Dedington in co Oxford.
 
**In re John Burley, late of Dedington in co Oxford.
*STAC 5/A49/18 - B - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v, William Baker, Watkin Traherne, William Traherne
 
 
**see also [[STAC Baker]]  
 
**see also [[STAC Baker]]  
 +
 +
''' Almoner v Billing '''
 +
*STAC 5/A23/39 - B - 12 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v John Byllynge
 +
**one John Burley late of Dedington co Oxon, butcher the 10th day of April Anno 12 Eliz, in his own dwelling house at Dedington hanged himself, felo de se
 +
*STAC 5/A21/16 - A - Oxfordshire - Almoner v John Billinge
 +
**see also [[STAC Billing]]
  
 
''' Almoner v Cox '''  
 
''' Almoner v Cox '''  
Line 414: Line 681:
 
**Felo de se at Adderbury Oxfordshire.
 
**Felo de se at Adderbury Oxfordshire.
 
**see also [[STAC Cox]]  
 
**see also [[STAC Cox]]  
 +
 +
''' Almoner v Huckvale '''
 +
*STAC 5/A23/19 - B - 16 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v Christopher Huckvale, John Meds
 +
**That whereas one Alice Tredwell late of Nether Heyford co Oxford about the 27th July Anno 16 Eliz, at Nether Heyford with a cart and horses drawing the same was slain, deodand
 +
**see also [[STAC Huckvale]]
  
 
''' Almoner v Ives '''
 
''' Almoner v Ives '''
Line 422: Line 694:
 
''' Almoner v Land '''
 
''' Almoner v Land '''
 
*STAC 5/A1/15 - B A - Oxfordshire - Mich 32 Eliz - Almoner v Richard Land  
 
*STAC 5/A1/15 - B A - Oxfordshire - Mich 32 Eliz - Almoner v Richard Land  
**In re John Lande late of Midletonstonye [Middleton Stoney] co Oxon felo de se. Impr did your father John Lande wilfully as a felon of himself hange and destroy himself, yea or noe. What corn and cattle had he. Deposition of Richard Lande of Mydlelston [Middleton Stoney].
+
**In re John Lande late of Midletonstonye [Middleton Stoney] co Oxon felo de se.
 
*STAC 5/A6/35 - I D - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v Martin Laud, Richard Laud
 
*STAC 5/A6/35 - I D - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v Martin Laud, Richard Laud
 
**Two sets of interrogatories for the Complainant. Deposition of Richard Lande.
 
**Two sets of interrogatories for the Complainant. Deposition of Richard Lande.
 +
**Impr did your father John Lande wilfully as a felon of himself hange and destroy himself, yea or noe. What corn and cattle had he. Deposition of Richard Lande of Mydlelston [Middleton Stoney].
 
**see also [[STAC Land]]
 
**see also [[STAC Land]]
  
Line 433: Line 706:
 
*STAC 5/A13/29 - B A - 23 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v William Skynner
 
*STAC 5/A13/29 - B A - 23 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v William Skynner
 
**see also [[STAC Skinner]]
 
**see also [[STAC Skinner]]
 +
 +
''' Almoner v Symonds '''
 +
*STAC 5/A17/31 - B - 8 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v Roger Symonds, Anthony Yeats et al
 +
**John Burley late of Dedenton [Deddington] co Oxford at Dedenton hanged himself felo de se.
 +
**see also [[STAC Symonds]]
 +
 +
''' Almoner v Talbot '''
 +
*STAC 5/A23/6 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v William Talbott, Paul Ives, John Spenser
 +
**Int: Whether did you know Thomas Ives late of Great Milton co Oxford yeoman and did he feloniously hang himself, felo de se. Deposition 1st June Anno 39 Eliz, Walter Talbot of Great Milton co Oxon husbandman aged 63, Paul Ives of Little Milton co Oxon husbandman aged 30, John Spenser of Little Milton joyner aged 40
 +
*STAC 5/A59/37 - A - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v William Talbott, Paul Ives et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Talbot]]
  
 
''' Almoner v Vaughan '''
 
''' Almoner v Vaughan '''
Line 454: Line 738:
 
*STAC 5/A23/14 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v John Croker, Henry Croker et al
 
*STAC 5/A23/14 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v John Croker, Henry Croker et al
 
**see also [[STAC Crocker]]  
 
**see also [[STAC Crocker]]  
 +
 +
''' AG v Poore '''
 +
*STAC 5/A11/9 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v Francis Poor, William Freere
 +
**A lot of legible depositions. Francis Poore had enclosed certain ground in Blechesden [?Bletchingdon]
 +
**Deponent John Banister of Islippe co Oxford husbandman aged 60 years
 +
*STAC 5/A50/32 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v William Frere et al
 +
**Frere’s year as sheriff coincided with serious riots in the county caused by economic depression. He had made his Water Eaton estate profitable by ditching and draining, and the villagers claimed he had enclosed common land. A witness examined in January 1597, after the disturbances had been suppressed, stated that Frere had ‘destroyed the whole town of Water Eaton’, and admitted that the rioters had intended to ‘spoil’ his house. The attorney-general brought an enclosure case against Frere and others in the Star Chamber, still unsettled in February 1598, with Frere still claiming that the district had profited by his improvements and that no one had suffered injury. ‘Frere, William’ by N M Fuidge in History of Parliament vols 1558-1603.
 +
*STAC 5/A33/31 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v Philip Poore, Thomas Longe, Thomas Martyn et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Poore]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Trensham '''
 +
*STAC 5/A13/36 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v Thomas Tresham, Edmund Ludlow et al
 +
*STAC 5/A49/7 - A C - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v Thomas Isham et al
 +
**STAC 5/A13/36; STAC 5/A49/7 cited in John E Martin, Feudalism to capitalism: peasant and landlord in English agrarian development, Palgrave, 1983. Oxfordshire. Related to an abortive uprising in 1597.
 +
**see also [[STAC Tresham]]
  
 
<BR>
 
<BR>
Line 508: Line 807:
 
*TNA E159/421 Michaelmas Term, 43-44 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1601
 
*TNA E159/421 Michaelmas Term, 43-44 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1601
 
**From Thomas Heath de Shelfwell, Oxon, armiger: £20.
 
**From Thomas Heath de Shelfwell, Oxon, armiger: £20.
 +
 +
''' Possibilities '''
 +
 +
''' Dormer v Dormer '''
 +
*STAC 5/D35/27 - B Dr - 33 Eliz - - Jesper Dormer v Francis Dormer, John Littleton, Edward Sheldon et al
 +
**STAC 8/162/6 Joan Humphrye, late the wife of Lawrence Humphrye, DD, and Justine Dormer, late the wife of Jasper Dormer, son of John Dormer esq. v Ralph Sheldon esq of Becley, Worcestershire, Edward Sheldon his son and heir apparent, John Crocker esq, Edward Crowshawe gent, Thomas Robins alias Thomas Robertes, George Hannes, Daniel Chysnall (Chesnall), Thomas Missin, William Thornett, and others. Seizure of hay and grass from the manor of Barton Charcells, whereof plaintiffs Joan Humphrye and Justine Dormer own three-fourths for terms, the remainder being claimed by the said Ralph Sheldon and Edward Sheldon; assaults on said plaintiffs and their servants, seizure of firewood, cutting and carrying timber, etc. Oxfordshire. 1604.
 +
**see [[STAC Dormer]]
 +
 +
''' Luter v Webb '''
 +
*STAC 5/L3/3 - B Dr - 25 Eliz - - John Luter v Thomas Webb, Simon Wickham, Nicholas Allrich
 +
**see Webbe v Luter above
 +
**just possibly TNA C 2/Eliz/W3/38 Thomas Webbe. v Edward Andrews and John Luther. To be relieved against a recognizance entered into by the plaintiff respecting certain messuages and lands in Banbury, Oxfordshire, some time the estate of John Luther. 
 +
**see [[STAC Luter]]
 +
 +
''' Webbe v Luter'''
 +
*STAC 5/W20/16 - B A Rn Rr - 24 Eliz - - Thomas Webbe v John Luter
 +
*STAC 5/W42/19 - I D - 26 Eliz - - Thomas Webbe v John Luter
 +
*STAC 5/W32/24 - C I D - 26 Eliz - - Thomas Webbe v John Luter
 +
*STAC 5/W22/37 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Thomas Webbe v John Hutton
 +
**see Luter v Webb below
 +
**just possibly TNA C 2/Eliz/W3/38 Thomas Webbe. v Edward Andrews and John Luther. To be relieved against a recognizance entered into by the plaintiff respecting certain messuages and lands in Banbury, Oxfordshire, some time the estate of John Luther. 
 +
**see [[STAC Webb]]

Latest revision as of 18:49, 24 February 2024

Oxfordshire

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

A

Alford v Westby

  • STAC 5/A37/1 - B - - Oxfordshire - Francis Alforde v Francis Westbe
    • Bill damaged. Francis Alforde of London, gent. Manor of Somertons in North Aston, Oxon. Lease from Willm Anne of [?Clisberrie?].(dk)
  • STAC 5/A35/20 - B A - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Francis Westbye
  • STAC 5/A8/26 - I D - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alforde v Francis Westbe

Alford v Lee

  • STAC 5/A32/32 - A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee, Richard Awsten
  • STAC 5/A52/20 - B A Rn - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee
    • Francis Alford of London gent. The Manor of Somertons in Oxfordshire
  • STAC 5/A10/5 - I - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alforde v Richard Austen, Edward Lee
  • STAC 5/A57/25 - D - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee
  • STAC 5/A22/17 - A I D - 24 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee
  • STAC 5/A52/9 - B - 31 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee
    • Top part of the Bill badly discoloured
  • STAC 7/17/7 - - Oxfordshire - Francis Alford v Edward Lee

B

Belson v Somester

Berry or Bury v Nutting

  • STAC 5/B83/16 - B A Rn C - 11 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Berry v John Nutting, John Croker
  • STAC 5/B90/4 - B - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Bury v John Croker, Gerrard Croker, John Baker, John Nuttynge
    • Thomas Burye of London, gent. Manor of Water Eaton, Oxon.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B103/4 - I D - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Bury v John Baker, John Nattinge

Bewforreste v Bewforreste

  • STAC 5/B26/34 - B - 6 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Alice Bewforreste v Luke Bewforreste
    • Forcible entry (cm)
    • See Legalism: Community and Justice. Fernanda Pirie, Judith Scheele.(dk)
    • see also STAC Beauforest

Brasenose College v Croker

  • STAC 5/H7/2 - B - 30 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Harryes et al Principal & Scholars of Brasen Nose College Oxon v John Croker, John Bonner Sr, John Bonner Jr, William Bonner
    • see TNA C 43/10/55 Principal and scholars of Brasenose Coll., Oxon, v Croker, Dormer, Hawthen and Bonner. Subject: Proceedings on recognizance of debt. Judgment. Cudlington alias Kidlington, manor, lands etc County: Oxon 29 Eliz. 
    • see also STAC Oxford U

Broome v Hore

  • STAC 5/B39/37 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - George Brome v Anthony Hore
    • Anthony Hore is of Hedington co Oxford. Interrogatories mention the Assizes at Oxford
    • see also STAC Broome where there are a lot of other connecting references.

Bryan v Cullen

  • STAC 5/B26/19 - B A - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v Richard Cullyn, Robert Ball et al
    • disputes arising from an earlier almoner's case re: a suicide (cm)
  • STAC 5/B12/18 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simond Bryon v Leonard Taylor
  • STAC 5/B18/34 - D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v Robert Inglefield
  • STAC 5/B36/18 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Bryan v Richard Cullyn, Francis Bradshaw, Michael Foster et al
  • STAC 5/B39/14 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Bryan v Richard Cullen et al
    • Deposition of Richard Cullen, then a prisoner.
  • STAC 5/B66/9 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Brian v Richard Inglefeild, Richard Cullin, Francis Bradshawe
  • STAC 5/B83/12 - D - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v William Higgins
  • STAC 7/18/69 - - - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v William Hyggens et al
  • STAC 5/B81/12 - D - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v William Higgins

Bryan v Cantfield

  • STAC 5/B33/4 - B A Dr - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Bryan v George Cantfirld, Richard Brown, Thomas Ravys et al
  • STAC 5/B14/40 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Bryan v James Hussey et al
    • Simon Bryan of the City of Oxford. Refs previous Star Chamber suit v Richard Cullyn sometime fellow of Magdalene College, Oxford & another Star Chamber suit v Cullyn & Alexander Hill, servant of Thomas Ravys. Also actions brought at Oxford Quarter Sessions in an attempt to force the abandonment of these previous suits.(dk)
    • see also STAC Bryan

Bye v Archdett

  • STAC 5/B26/25 - B A Rn Rr - 23 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Bye v Mary Archdett, Anthony Fearne alias Vearne

C

Campden v Truman

  • STAC 5/C18/13 - B A - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Campden v John Truman, Matthew Hunt et al
  • STAC 5/C20/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Cambden v John Trumlin, Matthew Hunt et al
    • Oxfordshire
  • STAC 5/C57/27 - R - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Francis Campler v Thomas Sturte, John Trueman et al

Carleton v Lee

  • STAC 5/C74/36 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Anthony Carleton v Thomas Lee, Robert Lee
  • STAC 5/C10/15 - I D - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Anthony Carleton v Bartholemew Pygott, Richard Lee, Robert Lee
    • Deponents: Bartholemew Pygott and Richard Lee of Whytfield, gent. and Robert Lee of Aston, gent.
  • STAC 5/C74/27 - I D - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Anthony Carleton v Bartholomew Pigott Richard Lee et al
  • STAC 5/C12/9 - I D - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Antony Carleton v Thomas Lee, Richard Surman

Carter v Hore

  • STAC 5/C28/30 - B A - Mich 43/44 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Henry Carter v Richard Hore, Edward Hill, John Tredwell et al
  • STAC 5/C43/19 - I - 44 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Henry Carter v Richard Hore, Edward Hill et al
  • STAC 5/C1/18 - I D - 44 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Henry Carter v Richard Hoore, Edward Hill, John Andrews, Richard Ewen, John Tredwell, Robert Thriffe, Richard Parne

Clark v Lenthall

  • STAC 5/C69/9 - B A - Oxfordshire - Nicholas Clark v William Lewthall
    • Nicholas Clarck, taylor of Haseley, Oxon v Willm Lenthall. Refs also in Star Chamber, John Halle v this complt and John Goode of Haseley, husbandman claiming perjury at Oxford Assizes. (dk)
    • see also STAC Clark

Clarke v Tymes

  • STAC 5/C64/11 - B - 44 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Clarke v Richard Tymes
    • Willm Clarke of Upper Heyford, Oxon. Fraud. Money due to the complts wife Bridgett, late the wife and administratrix of George Goughe late of Upper Heyford.(dk)
    • see also STAC Clark

Clement v Bewforest

  • STAC 5/C3/14 - B A Rn C I D - 6 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Clement v Luke Bewforest, Roger French, John Spencer, Thomas Feachyld, Roger Brown et al
    • Copyhold in Dorchester [Dorchester on Thames], Oxfordshire. Legible Depositions.
    • see also STAC Clement

Cole v Knight

  • STAC 5/C81/2 - B - 12 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Coles v Richard Knight, Alexander Squire et al
  • STAC 7/11/6 - - - Oxfordshire - John Cooles alias Taylor v Richard Knight, Alexander Squire, Thomas Rycottes, John Buckley et al
    • TNA Note: West Weald: Forcible dispute as to a house, etc.
  • STAC 5/C9/17 - I D - 12 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Coles alias Tanor v Richard Knight
  • STAC 5/C54/9 - I D - 13 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Coles v Richard Knight et al

Chritchley v Benson

  • STAC 5/C20/5 - B A - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Jeffrey Chritchlye v Michael Allen, John Benson et al
    • The Parson’s Bull of Stanton Harcourt, a common bull that was to feed up and down in all their fields
  • STAC 5/C9/9 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Geffery Crutchley v Thomas Benson

Croft v Earl of Lincoln

  • STAC 5/C78/20 - B - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Croftes v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Cuthbert Raynold et al
    • James Croftes of Weston, Oxon. Parsonage house of Weston.(dk)
  • STAC 5/C67/10 - I D - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Croft v Cuthbert Reynolds, James Blower
  • STAC 5/C69/11 - A - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln Robert Blower et al
  • STAC 5/C70/11 - A Rn C I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Christopher Cowley et al
  • STAC 5/C71/8 - I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Croft v Roger Fullshaw
  • STAC 5/C19/36 - B - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofte v Henry Earl of Lincolne, John Whitchcote et al

Crooke v Scrope

  • STAC 5/C20/13 - B A - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Robert Crooke v Andrew Scrope, Robert Scrope et al
  • STAC 5/C13/18 - I D - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Robert Crooke v Adrian Scroop, Robert Scroope et al

D

Dangerfield v Tidmarsh

  • STAC 5/D23/35 - B - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Dangerfeald v Robert Tidmarshe, John Rooke & John Tidmarshe

Danvers v Tasbrough

  • STAC 5/D27/14 - B A Rn Dr - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasborowgh, John Moore, John Hailes, John Allen et al
  • STAC 5/D42/13 - Rr - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasbroughe, William Sleepe et al
  • STAC 5/D41/10 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasburgh
  • STAC 5/D40/21 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasborough, William Sleepe et al
  • STAC 5/D39/13 - R - 37 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasborough, Robert Smithe, Robert More et al
  • STAC 5/D38/8 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasboroughe et al
  • STAC 5/D37/24 - I D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Humfrey Fitz Herbert, Thomas Harrison et al
  • STAC 5/D30/1 - I D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasburgh, William Sleepe et al
  • STAC 5/D30/28 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Henry Wenman
  • STAC 5/D23/15 - I D B A Rn - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasbroughe, William Steepe, John Trewman
  • STAC 5/D19/25 - I D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasborrowgh, Jane Tasborrowgh (his wife) et al
  • STAC 5/D14/15 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasburghe, William Sleepe et al
  • STAC 5/D17/30 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v John Truman alias Trapeng et al
  • STAC 5/D36/18 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v John Allen et al
  • STAC 5/D2/40 - B A - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasborough, John Wayneman, William Wayneman, Francis Wayneman, Nicholas Humphreys, Thomas Angel et al
  • STAC 5/D31/3 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v John Trueman et al
  • STAC 5/D31/34 - I D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v John Wayneman, William Waynetnan
  • STAC 5/D10/17 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasboroughe, William Sleepe et al
  • STAC 5/D32/1 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasborough, John Trueman
  • STAC 5/D6/36 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasburghe et al
  • STAC 5/D4/37 - I D Rr - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasborowe et al
    • Deponents: John Seymor, of Bampton, Oxon, ?yeoman?, aged 69. John Frenche, of Aston in the parish of Bampton, Oxon, yeoman, aged 74. Rowland Thorneborrow, of St Thomas near the City of Oxford, yeoman, aged 72. William Musgrave, of Stanlake, Oxon, taylor, aged 67. John Allen, of Stanlake, Oxon, husbandman, aged 60. Johan the wife of Rowland Thorneborrow, aged 40. James Wayne, of Bampton, Oxon, husbandman, aged 27. John Hillyard, of Bampton, Oxon, joyner, aged 58. George Dotyn, of Bampton, Oxon, yeoman. Andrew Dottyn, of Bampton, Oxon, yeoman. (dk)
  • STAC 5/D5/28 - I D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasboroughe et al
    • Deponent 14 January Anno 35 Eliz: Hercules Raynesford, of Mychell Town, Oxon, esquire, aged 66 (dk)
  • STAC 5/D16/21 - I D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasborough et al
    • Deponent from Oxon. Interrs refer to John Seymer & John Allen having deposed on behalf of Sir John Danvers in this court against Thomas Tasborough, and whether they have received inducements to recant their depositions. (dk)
  • STAC 5/D13/27 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Danvers v Thomas Tasborroughe
  • STAC 7/20/6 - - - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasboroughe et al
  • STAC 5/D5/18 - I D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v Thomas Young et al
    • Interrogatories to be ministered to Thomas Younge one of the defendants on behalf of Sir John Danvers complainant, include: Were you on 2 September last in Weald Feildes, Oxon. Was your speech tending to procure the said John Seamer, Rowland Thorneboro, John Allen & the rest of the witnesses to make a petition to the Lords of the Privy Council that these witnesses had been mistaken in their depositions last summer in the Star Chamber case Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasborowghe. Deponent Thomas Younge, of Bampton, Oxon, yeoman. 31 January 35 Eliz
  • STAC 5/D7/2 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John D'Anvers v John Hales
  • STAC 5/D11/40 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Sir John Danvers v John Wayman, Robert Moore et al
    • Interference with witnesses in the Star Chamber suit Sir John Danvers v Thomas Tasboroughe and others. Interrogatories to John Waymann, Robert Moore, Robert Smythe & Roberte Ballard defts on behalf of Sir John Danvers. Depositions of the above. (dk)
    • see also STAC Danvers

Dawtrey v Barnard

  • STAC 5/D36/40 - B D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v John Barnard, John Hayer et al
  • STAC 5/D5/37 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrye v John Bernard
    • Interrogatories to be ministered to John Bernard, gent deft at the suit of William Dawtrey, gent complt, include: Do you know of a suit in Chancery against the said complt & Jane his wife in the name of Thomas Monncke concerning a supposed gift or grant made to Monncke by Thomas Deagle decd for 20 years of a messuage & lands in Westwell, Oxon, together with a stock of 200 sheep, 10 kine, 6 oxen etc. Have you at any time advised the said Monncke in the exhibiting of the said suit. Deponent 27 November Anno 40 Eliz: John Bernard, of Broade Risington, Gloucs, gent. (dk)
    • see also STAC Dawtrey

Dawtrey v Monck

  • STAC 5/D23/16 - B A C Rn - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v Thomas Mounck, Elizabeth Mounck, William Halywell, John Bernard et al
  • STAC 5/D39/22 - A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v Thomas Monck et al
  • STAC 5/D9/27 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtree v Thomas Monke et uxor
  • STAC 5/D19/20 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrey v Thomas Beste
    • Messuage at Westwell, Oxon. Interrs refer to suit in Chancery: Thomas Monncke v Willm Dawtrey & Joane his wife.(dk).
  • STAC 5/D9/30 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Dawtrye v William Hollowaie alias Hallywell

Denton v Holton

  • STAC 5/D1/2 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Denton v Henry Holton, Christopher Hixe et al
    • Deponents: Henry Holton, of Kyddlington on the Green, Oxon, glover, aged 50. Christopher Hix, of Wolvercote, Oxon, husbandman, aged 33. (dk)
    • see also STAC Denton

Denton v Kidder

  • STAC 5/D2/26 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Denton v James Kidder, James Feris, William Pygott, Michael Galamere, John Tufnell et al
  • STAC 5/D39/45 - R - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Denton v James Kidder
  • STAC 5/D5/26 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Denton v James Kydder
    • Interrogatories only (dated May 1598) to be ministered to James Kydder gent deft to bill of William Denton complt, include: Did you or some other procure Edward Huffer, Robert Stimpson als Stimson, Thomas Mayes, Christopher Hixe, Henry Holton and John Beamonde that if, in your absence, William Denton should get possession of the manor of Somertons in Northaston, Oxon then they should regain possession for you. Were you privy to an entry into the said manor in riotous manner on 14 May Anno 37 Eliz (dk)
  • STAC 5/D1/2 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Denton v Henry Holton, Christopher Hixe et al
    • Deponents: Henry Holton, of Kyddlington on the Green, Oxon, glover, aged 50. Christopher Hix, of Wolvercote, Oxon, husbandman, aged 33. (dk)
    • see also STAC Denton

Dingley v Lee

  • STAC 5/D36/12 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edulphe Dingley v Grumwell Lee, Thomas Brown et al
    • Edulphe Dingley Town Clark of Woodstock.
    • see also STAC Dingley

Doyley v Bastard

  • STAC 5/D12/32 - B A - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Ralph Doyley v William Bastard et uxor, Walter Floyd et al
  • STAC 5/D39/39 - A - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Raph Doyley v William Busterde, John Cricke, Edward Lowe et al
  • STAC 5/D4/39 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Ralph Doilye v William Bustard et al, John Cricke et al
    • Deponents: John Cryke, of Adderburye, Oxon, yeoman. William Martin servant to William Bustard of Adderburye, Oxon. William Bustard, of Adderburie, Oxon, Esqr. Katherine the wife of William Bustard of Adderburye, Oxon. Edward Lowe,of Adderburie, Oxon, yeoman. (dk)
  • STAC 5/D18/35 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Ralphe Doylie v William Powlson, William Westlie

Duport v Dutton

  • STAC 5/D38/9 - B - 23 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Duport v Thomas Dutton, William Jackson et al
  • STAC 5/D34/33 - A R Rr - 23 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Duport v Thomas Dutton, John Mogg, William Bladen et al
    • Theft of cattle; Subornation. (cm)
  • STAC 5/D38/36 - I D - 24 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Duporte v Thomas Dutton et al

E

Edolph v Gardiner

  • STAC 5/E1/2 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 29 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symond Edolphe v Thomas Gardyner, John Wyse, William Carter, Thomas Ward
    • Bill dirty and incomplete. Possibly five sets of interrogatories. Some depositions and an abstract of depositions
    • Adderbury parish tything customs Oxfordshire. Thomas Gardiner characterised as a vexatious litigant.
    • To the second he saith that he hath heard that he the said Thomas Gerdyner served wryttes of the Complainant and of one Page and one William Hall but of no others to his remembrance. To the third he saith that the said Thos Gerdyner overtakinge Burford Syse used these threatening wordes to this deponent As you are going to Burford against me and are Surveer of my Lande and hame but I will have A wrytt for you and plye the lawe with you.
  • STAC 5/E13/10 - I D - 29 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Edolphe v Thomas Gardener, Thomas Warde
  • STAC 5/E13/36 - I D - 29 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Edolph v Richard Tucke et al
  • STAC 5/E14/13 - I D - 29 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Edolph v Thomas Gardner
  • STAC 5/E7/39 - I D - 30 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Edolph v Thomas Gardener
  • STAC 5/E15/40 - I - - Oxfordshire - Simon Edolphe v Thomas Gardner

English v Bowyer and Kingston

  • STAC 5/E11/20 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John English v John Kingston, Thomas Cheek et al
  • STAC 5/E8/8 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Englishe v John Kingston et al
  • STAC 5/E10/32 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John English v John Kingston, Thomas Norclyffe et al
  • STAC 5/E2/40 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John English v John Kingston
  • STAC 5/E14/38 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Englishe v Thomas Cheeke
  • STAC 5/J15/18 - Rr - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Inglishe v Thomas Cheeke
  • STAC 5/E5/10 - - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Englishe v James Bowyer, John Kingston et al
  • STAC 5/E1/18 - B A - 44 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Englishe v James Bowyer, John Kingston, Thomas Cheke
    • John Englishe of Aston Rowant co Oxon. James Bower late of Falcotte co Oxon.
    • see also STAC English

F

Fludde v Browne

  • STAC 5/F1/40 - B A - Trin 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Fludde v Richard Browne, Humphrey Short, Robert Clarke
    • John Fludde of Oxford haberdasher. Londoners trying to collect on a debt. Case in Common Pleas
    • see also STAC Fludd

Floyd v Brown

  • STAC 5/F25/5 - I D - 27 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Floyd alias Lloyd v John Brown

Fryers v Silvester

  • STAC 5/F3/8 - B - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v Robert Sylvester
    • Edmund Fryers gent. of Kencott, Oxonfordshire. That whereas one Robert Silvester late of Burford, clothier, deceased. Land in Burford, Oxon.
    • see also STAC Fryer

Fryers v Yate

  • STAC 5/F23/37 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch et al
  • STAC 5/F28/7 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v John Yate, Richard Palmer et al
  • STAC 5/F6/2 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v James Hiche, Richard Palmer et al
  • STAC 5/F1/13 - I D C - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch, Richard Palmer, Edward Joyes, Thomas Everett
    • Depositions taken at Burford. Deponents: Francis Hampson of Bradwell Oxon gent aged 27, John Potter of Ogborne St George co Wilts aged 60, Ambrose Mylles of Highworthe co Wilts woollen draper aged 42, Agnes Hall of Kencote co Oxon widow aged 76, John Grene of Kencote husbandman aged 40, Thomas Heynes of Kencote husbandman aged 56, Humphrey Hewlett of Kencote husbandman aged 50, Anthony H[ ]nlowe of Bradwell husbandman aged 60, Francis Taylor alias Sharye of Kencote husbandman aged 36
    • see also STAC Fryer see also Yate v Fryers

Fyfield v Bray

  • STAC 5/F8/29 - B A - 29 Eliz - Oxfordshire - The Inhabitants of Fyfeild, Oxon v Silvester Braye, Edward Beale et al

G

Gadbury v Bowyer

  • STAC 5/G6/29 - B A Rn Rr - 13 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Gadburye v Drewe Gadburye, John Boyer, Alice Bennet, Edmond Gregory
  • STAC 5/G40/4 - I D - 13 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Gadburgh v John Bowyer

Gadbury v Bowyer

  • STAC 5/G17/9 - I D - 17 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Gadbury v Edmund Gregory
    • First whether do you know that Cicely Gadbury was in her lifetime possessed of divers sheep pasture grounds and meads at Waterstock in the county of Oxford and if she were whether one John Boyer did buy the said sheep and her term of years in the said grounds and if you did then of whom. Deponent, Edmund Gregory of Cockesham [Cuxham] co Oxford husbondman.
  • STAC 5/G44/38 - I D - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Gadbury v John Boyer

Gadbury v Bowyer

  • STAC 5/G14/26 - B A - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Gadburye v John Bowyer, James Bowyer, William Gadbury

Gawain v Stone

  • STAC 5/G37/7 - B A Rr - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Gawyne v John Stone, Thomas Armstrong
  • STAC 5/G34/11 - A - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Gewen, Pentecost Leye v John Stone, Robert Stone, John Collin et al
  • STAC 5/G39/4 - I D - 24 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Gawine v John Stone
  • STAC 5/G45/6 - I D - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Gawyn v John Stone, Thomas Armstrong et al
  • STAC 5/G46/38 - Rr - - Oxfordshire - Thomas Gawen v John Stone, Thomas Armestrong
  • STAC 5/G45/37 - Rn - - Oxfordshire - Joan Gawine, Thomas Gawine v John Stone, James Hewishe
    • see STAC 2/26/446 Thomas Gawine v John Stone and Thomas Armstrong. Subornation of perjury (interrogatories only) Oxford
    • see also STAC Gawen and Stone v Gawain below

Gilkes v Bigge

  • STAC 5/G20/3 - B A - 42 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Robert Gilkes v Thomas Bigge v Richard Coxe
    • Riot, assault, trespass. Defendants took possession of the plaintiff's property with arms. Gilkes (yeoman) Deanes Bigge (wife of Thomas Bigge) Jane Cox (wife of Anthony Cox) Defendants answered not guilty. (mg)
    • see also STAC Gilkes

H

Hall v Good

  • STAC 5/H27/27 - B A - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Hall v Nicholas Clark, John Good
  • STAC 5/H49/31 - I D - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Hall v John Good, Nicholas Clerke
  • STAC 5/H53/33 - C I D - 26 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Hall v John Good, et al
    • Deponents: Thomas Haicock aged 64, Thomas Wynniard labourer, John Wyncle tailor aged 54 of Oxford. Thomas Gadburie of Kidlington Oxfordshire aged 76. William Lenthall of Latchford Oxfordshire aged 30 gentlemen. John Beall tailor aged 55, William Johnson joiner aged 50, Harry Pangburne aged 58, Thomas Belingame aged 56, William Richardson aged 55, labourers, of Great Halsey [Great Haseley] Oxfordshire. Thomas Newe of Little Hasley [Little Haseley] Oxfordshire husbandman aged 60. John Johnson of Tettesfourth [?Tetsworth] Oxfordshire husbandman aged 40. John Collins of New Inn Middlesex gentleman aged 32.
    • see also STAC Hall

Hall v Rose

  • STAC 5/H5/16 - B A - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Agnes Hall v Robert Rose, John Atkyns
    • Bill (very faded) of Agnes Hall widow late wife of Thomas Hall of [ ] co Oxon yeoman. In re meadow land in the manor of Adderburye alias Gadburbie. Answer of Rose and Atkins
  • STAC 5/H46/28 - I D - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Agnes Hall v John Askins, Robert Rose

Harcourt v Dudson

  • STAC 5/H42/15 - B A Rn Rr - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Harcourt v Oliver Dudson, William Powell

Holte v Kitchen

  • STAC 5/H17/10 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Holte v John Kitchin, Richard Howes et al
  • STAC 5/H19/1 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Holte v John Kitchin, Solomon Lambert et al
    • see also STAC Holt and see below Kitchin v Holte

Hore v Bury

  • STAC 5/H39/3 - B A Rn Rr I D - 11 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Hore v John Bury, Thomas Norrey et al
    • STAC 5/H39/3 cited in Norman L Jones, The birth of the Elizabethan Age: England in the 1560s, Wiley, 1995. Violent property dispute. Manor of Water Eaton, Oxon. (Text has the complt as Thomas Hare)
  • STAC 5/H39/27 - I D - 10 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Hore v John Bury et al
  • STAC 5/H10/22 - C I D - 11 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Hore v John Bury et al

Hulmes v Reynolds

  • STAC 5/H26/16 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Richard Reynolds, Robert Starre et al
  • STAC 5/H77/32 - B A - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Richard Reignolds, John Templer et al
  • STAC 5/H10/1 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes v Richard Reynolds et al
  • STAC 5/H15/28 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes v Robert Starre, Simon Greene et al
  • STAC 5/H10/14 - I - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Houlmes, William Paxford v Robert Starre, Richard Reynolds
  • STAC 5/H10/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Thomas Templer alias Byrt, Thomas Hughs alias Colcot et al
  • STAC 7/23/48 - - - Oxfordshire - Edward Hulmes et al v William Paxford et al

I J

Jarvis v Taylor

  • STAC 5/J21/38 - B A - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Jarvis v John Taylor, Thomas Denson et al
    • Property in Brightwell Baldwin, Oxfordshire
  • STAC 5/J5/4 - A - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Jervyce v William Pyke, John Tayler et al

Jarvis v Haley

  • STAC 5/J5/10 - C I - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Jervys v Robert Hallye, Augustin Rose et al
  • STAC 5/J14/32 - I D - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Jarveis v Robert Haley, Augustine Rosse, John Clement
  • STAC 5/G6/31 - D - 19 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Gervys v Augustine Roose et al
  • STAC 7/13/2 - - - Oxfordshire - James Jarvies v Robert Haley et al

K

Kendall v Gough

  • STAC 5/K2/9 - B A Rn Rr - Trin 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Henry Kendall v John Goughe, John Jorden
    • Blockeshamme [Bloxham] in Oxfordshire.
  • STAC 5/K14/12 - I D - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Henry Kendall v John Gough, John Jorden

Kitchin v Holte

  • STAC 5/K7/11 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Kitchin v Thomas Holte, John Clifton et al
  • STAC 5/K4/20 - Rn I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Kitchin v Thomas Holte, John Clifton et al
    • Deposition of Thomas Holte of Stoke Lysle Oxfordshire.
  • STAC 5/K8/29 - Rr - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Kitchin v Thomas Holk et al

Kent v Dubber

  • STAC 5/K8/27 - I D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Kent et uxor v John Dubber, John Tomlyn et al
    • Richard Kent of Wootton in Oxfordshire yeoman and Elizabeth his wife.
    • see also STAC Kent

L

Lee v Hogan

  • STAC 5/L23/14 - B A Rn Rr - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Lee v Edmond Hogan
  • STAC 5/L24/11 - I D - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Lee v Edmond Hogan
  • STAC 5/L21/9 - I D - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Lea v Edmond Hogan
  • STAC 5/L13/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Lee v Edmund Hogan
    • see TNA C 2/Eliz/L5/45 Richard Lee esq. v Edmund Hogan and John Croker. Claim as assignee of leaseholds. The mansion or farm and manor of Hocknorton, otherwise Hogsnorton [Hook Norton], Oxfordshire, and the rectory and parsonage thereof, held under a lease from the bishop of Oxford.
    • see also STAC Lee

Earl of Lincoln v Croft

  • STAC 5/L28/10 - I D - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Henry Earl of Lincoln v Thomas Crofts, William Beale et al
  • STAC 5/L48/9 - B Rn - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Henry Earl of Lincoln v James Crofts, Thomas Crofts et al
  • STAC 5/L36/35 - I D - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Henry, Earl of Lincoln v James Croft
  • STAC 5/L29/3 - I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Henry, Earl of Lincoln v James Croffs et al
  • STAC 7/13/13 - - - Oxfordshire - Henry earl of Lincoln, v James Croftes, Edolphe Dingley, Thomas Croft et al
    • TNA Note: Weston: Parsonage.
  • STAC 5/L4/13 - B - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Henry Earl of Lincoln v James Crofts, Edolph Dingley, William Rayer, Arthur Hyde et al

Earl of Lincoln v Dymock and Hall

  • STAC 5/L21/37 - I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Earl of Lincoln v Thomas Dymock, John Dymock, William Hall et al
  • STAC 5/L1/7 - B A - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Henry Earl of Lincoln v John Dymock Jr, John Dymock Sr, Thalbois Dymock, William Hall

M

Munday v Martin

  • STAC 5/M15/11 - B A - 34 Eliz - Somerset, Oxfordshire - Henry Mundaye v Thomas Martin, Hugh French et al
    • Henry Munday of Chard, Somerset. Debts of Thomas Martyn late Alderman of the City of Oxford.(dk)
  • STAC 5/M46/4 - I D - 34 Eliz - Somerset, Oxfordshire - Henry Monday v Hugh French, Richard Jordan

N

Norris v Barnes

  • STAC 5/N3/30 - B A - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Lord Henry Norreys v Edmund Barnes, Richard Mollyner et al
    • Sir Henry Norreys knight Lord Norreys of Rycott. The Manor of Dorchester [on Thames] Oxfordshire
  • STAC 5/N16/14 - I D - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Lord Norreys v Edmund Barnes

Norris v Postern

  • STAC 5/N2/3 - B A Rn - Michael 30 & 31 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Lord Henry Norris, Alice Cobbe v Hugh Cobb, John Postern, Richard Clement, Richard Bannister
    • Dorchester, Oxon. Attempt to gain copyhold tenement, which had been granted by Lord Norris to a poor widow for her life, by claiming debts of her late husband.(dk)
  • STAC 5/N8/33 - I D - 31 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Lord Henry Norries, Alice Cobbe v John Posterne, Richard Clement

O

Christ Church Cathedral Oxford v Johnson

  • STAC 5/O6/39 - B A Rn - 11 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Dean & Chapter of Christ Church Oxford v John Johson, Roger Vernon, John Malton et al
  • STAC 5/C7/16 - I Dn - 11 Eliz - Oxfordshire - The Dean and Chapter of Christchurch Oxon, v John Malbare, [blank] Venables et al

Christ Church Cathedral Oxford v Marten

  • STAC 5/O8/8 - B A - 20 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Dean and Chapter of Christ Church Oxford, William Turner v Nicholas Marten, Matthew Rogers, Guy Light, Henry Lawrence, Henry Rogers et al.
  • STAC 5/C80/6 - Rn - Oxfordshire - Dean and Chapter of Christ Church, v Matthew Rogers, Henry Rogers, Guy Lighte

Christ Church Cathedral Oxford v President of Magdalen College

  • STAC 5/O8/33 - Rn - - Oxfordshire - Dean and Chapter of Oxford v President of Magdalen Colledge, William Standishe et al.
    • Repln of Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford to the answer of The President of Magdalen College in Oxford, William Standishe, Anthony Bustard & John Billyng. Close in Barforde, Oxon. (dk) - STAC 5/O8/33
    • see also STAC Oxford

Christ Church Cathedral Oxford v Rogers

  • STAC 5/O5/38 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Dean, Chapter of Christ Church, Oxford, William Turner v Mathew Rogers, Guye Light, Henry Lawrence et al.
  • STAC 5/C80/6 - Rn - Oxfordshire - Dean and Chapter of Christ Church, v Matthew Rogers, Henry Rogers, Guy Lighte

Oxford Corporation v Wilkinson

  • STAC 5/T37/6 - B A Rn - 3 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Tattersall, Robert Frewen v Robert Wilkinson, Robert Haskins et al
  • STAC 5/O5/39 - I D - 3 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Baylies of Oxford v Robert Wilkinson, Robert Haskins, Henry Thackham et al.

Oxford University

P

Pell v Mosden

  • STAC 5/P1/38 - B A Rn Rr - 8 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Pell v Edmund Ashfield, Richard Mosden, William Mosden, William Box
  • STAC 5/P16/34 - I D - 8 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Pell Sr v Edmund Ashfield
  • STAC 5/P49/28 - I D - - Oxfordshire - John Pell v Richard Mosden et al
  • STAC 5/P54/23 - I D - 8 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Pell v Richard Mosden

Penyston v Whitton

  • STAC 5/P43/40 - B A - 16 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Penyston v George Whitton see STAC Peniston
    • The Answer of George Whitton gent to the Bill of Thomas Penyston son and heir to Jane and Anthony Penyston Deceased

Woodstock, Oxfordshire

Penyston v Ashfield

  • STAC 5/P38/21 - B - 28 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Peniston v John Ashfeild, Anne Ashfeild, Thomas Smith et al
  • STAC 7/4/29 - - - Oxfordshire - Thomas Peniston v John Asshfild et Anne uxor, Thomas Smith, John Osbaston, John Wacome, John Hawten et al

Penyston v Townshend

  • STAC 5/P4/18 - B A C I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Penniston v Peter Townsend et uxor, Richard Townsend, Annes Washley, Emy Gardner
    • Deponents: Charles Bowell of Ensham Oxfordshire baker-aged 19. Robert Lloyd of the University of Oxford Batchelor of Laws aged 32. Michael Marten of Ensham Oxfordshire yeoman aged 45. Henry Savage of Ensham Oxfordshire glover aged 60. Lawrence Heaton of Ensham Oxfordshire labourer aged 40. Robert Wawtlett of Ensham Oxfordshire baker aged 20. William Upperton of Ensham Oxfordshire labourer aged 20. William Costyne of Ensham Oxfordshire glover aged 54. Josias Pearce of Ensham Oxfordshire yeoman aged 30. William Devell - Ensham Oxfordshire baker aged 33. William Beeke of Ensham Oxfordshire husbandman aged 40 Samuell Watkins of Ensham Oxfordshire baker aged 21. William Cottrell of Ensham Oxfordshire tailor aged 40. Joane Turner of Ensham Oxfordshire widow and keeper of Richard Townsend in his sickness aged 60. Agnes Stiles of Ensham Oxfordshire wife of Edmund Stiles husbandman aged 50. John Bentley of the University of Oxford Doctor of Phisicke aged 48. Samuel Fletcher of Witney Oxfordshire husbandman aged 40 William Bust of the University of Oxford Master of Arts and practitioner of phisicke and chirurgerie aged 34. Legible deposiyions.
  • STAC 5/P63/25 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Penyston v Joan Townshend, Peter Townshend
  • STAC 5/P21/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Pennyston v Peter Townshend et uxor
  • STAC 5/P30/4 - I D - 37 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Penyston v Richard Townshend et al

Powell v Harcourt

  • STAC 5/P7/1 - B A Rn Rr Sr Rtr - 16 Eliz - Oxfordshire - William Powel, tenants and copyholders of the Manor of Sutton Oxfordshire v Simon Harcourt, Robert Harcourt, Charles Griffin, Thomas Wood, Thomas Talbot et al
  • STAC 5/P58/27 - I D - 17 Eliz - Oxfordshire William Powell, William Tather et al v Symon Harronot et al

Poole v Vines

  • STAC 5/P20/5 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - Oxford - Henry Poole v Ralph Vynes
  • STAC 5/P33/26 - I D - 29 Eliz - Oxford - Henry Poole v John Copland, Thomas Stephens et al
  • STAC 5/P52/8 - I D - 30 Eliz - Oxford - Henry Pole v Ralph Vines et al
  • STAC 5/P1/33 - B A Rn Rr - Easter 39 Eliz - Oxford - Henry Poole v Ralph Vyne, Thomas Stephens, William Ward, George Rideat et al
  • STAC 5/P9/15 - I D - 33 Eliz - Oxford - Henry Poole v Ralph Vynes et al
    • A coppice in Piddington Oxfordshire
    • see also STAC Poole

Q

R

Reynolds v Dutton '

  • STAC 5/R3/19 - B A Rn Rr C I D - Hil 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Raynolds, Thomas Hewes v Thomas Dutton, William Paxford, Edward Holmes, Gabriel Smith et al
  • STAC 5/R26/12 - B A C I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Reignalds, Thomas Lewes v Thomas Dutton
  • STAC 5/R33/35 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Reynolds et al v Thomas Dutton et al
  • STAC 5/R41/5 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Reignold, Thomas Hewes v Thomas Dutton, William Payford et al
  • STAC 5/R5/24 - I D - 20 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Reynolds, Thomas Hewes v Thomas Dutton, William Paxford, Edward Vawdrye
    • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 38r. Misdemeanor done against the bailiff of a town endeavoring to keep the peace punished but not as a riot. Reynolde and Hews, bailiffs of Burford in Oxfordshire, plaintiffs; Holmes et al: for misdemeanor in them committed against the plaintiffs and the constable of the town in assaulting and reviling them coming to supress an affray by them committed in the same town at such time as a fair was kept there for which offence, time and place and persons of the plaintiffs considered they were fined and committed £10 and £40. Michaelmas 23 Elizabeth (kk)
    • see also STAC Reynolds see also Hulmes v Reynolds above

Riley v Croker

  • STAC 5/R36/18 - B A Rn C I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Ryley v John Bonner, Robert Smyth et al
  • STAC 5/R11/8 - B A C - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Rylye v John Croker, John Bonner et al
  • STAC 5/R7/22 - I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Ryley v John Croker et al
  • STAC 7/14/38 - - - Oxfordshire - Richard Ryley v John Crocker, John Bonner, Robert Smith, John Pittam et al
    • TNA Note: Hook Norton: Assault on plaintiff's wife, and attack on his house - STAC 7/14/38
    • see also STAC Riley

S

Seacole v Stokes

  • STAC 5/S12/1 - B A C I D - 44 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Seacole v Richard Stokes, Robert Harrys et uxor, Michael Ashfield et al
  • STAC 7/15/19 - - - Oxfordshire - John Seacoll v Richard Stokes, Robert Harewood, Michael Ashfeild
    • TNA Note: Milton: Destruction of a furze-rick - STAC 7/15/19
  • STAC 5/S69/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Seacole v James Bewley et al

Scrope v Crooke

  • STAC 5/S38/10 - B A - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Andryan Scrope v William Crooke, Robert Crooke, William Symonds et al
  • STAC 5/S14/11 - I D - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Adrian Scroope v William Crooke, William Simons et al
  • STAC 5/S69/18 - I D - 18 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Adrian Scroope v Robert Crooke, William Symons et al
    • Enclosed wood in Stokenchurche, Oxon.(dk)
    • see also STAC Scrope

Sledd v Greene

  • STAC 5/S4/1 - B A - 43 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Sledd v William Greene, James Puresey, Richard Willmott, William Kirkby
    • Bill: torn ard part missing. Answer: Wm Greene esq. Answer: James Purefey. Answer: Ricd Wilmott. Answer: Wm Kirkby, Wm Durden, Thos Monday, Ricd Godfrey. Answer: John Howson clerk.
    • John Sledd clerk patronage of the vicarage of Milton under Deane Oxfordshire
  • STAC 5/S44/29 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Sled v William Greene, John Howson et al
  • STAC 5/S60/18 - I D - 43 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Sledd v John Howson
  • STAC 5/S13/15 - I D - 43 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Sledd v William Greene
  • STAC 5/S13/17 - I D - 43 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Sledd v William Kirbie, William Darden et al

Stone v Gawain

  • STAC 5/S69/8 - A Rn Rr - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Stone, Robert Stone v Thomas Gawine, John Bird et al
  • STAC 5/S24/6 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Stone, Robert Stone v Thomas Gawyn et uxor
  • STAC 5/S8/38 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Stone, Robert Stone v Walter Westmorland, Ralph White, Thomas Gawyn et al
  • STAC 5/S9/9 - I D - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Stone, Robert Stone v Elizabeth Banks, Thomas Finch et al
    • see STAC 2/26/446 Thomas Gawine v John Stone and Thomas Armstrong. Subornation of perjury (interrogatories only) Oxford
    • see also STAC Stone and Gawain v Stone above

Symmonds v Reynolds

  • STAC 5/S54/34 - B A - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Symon Symmonds, John Hannes et al v Thomas Reynolds, Robert Hayter et al
  • STAC 5/S81/11 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Simon Symonds, John Hannes et al v Thomas Reynolds, Robert Hayter
    • Symon Symmonds, John Hannes bailiffs of the town of Burford co Oxon. Internal dispute, assault on Bailiffs (with cudgels)
    • see also STAC Symonds

T

Taverner v Taverner

  • STAC 5/T19/27 - B A - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Taverner v Edmond Taverner, Thomas Badger
  • STAC 5/T12/38 - A - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Taverner v Peter Taverner et al
  • STAC 5/T25/14 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Taverner v Peter Tavener, Edmund Taverner, Thomas Badger et al
  • STAC 5/T39/8 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Taverner v Peter Taverner
  • STAC 5/T32/1 - I D - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Tavener v Robert Venton
    • STAC 5/T32/1 Interrs refer to the will of Richard Taverner the father, 5 deponents are all of Oxfordshire. (dk)
    • see also STAC Taverner

Temple v Croker

  • STAC 5/T22/30 - B A - 29 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Temple, William Fryar v John Croker
  • STAC 5/T32/5 - I D - 29 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Temple, William Fryer v John Croker

Tidmarsh v Dangerfield

  • STAC 5/T20/39 - B A - 21 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Tydmarsh v Thomas Daungerfeld, William Foxe
    • John Tidmershe of Chadlington in co Oxford husbandman. Lands in Chadlington. Embezzlement of a Charter.
  • STAC 5/T33/2 - B A I D - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Tidmersh v Thomas Dangerfeld
  • STAC 5/T26/6 - I D - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Tidmarshe v William Foxe, Edward Crofts et al

Townshend v Peniston

  • STAC 5/T3/5 - B A Rn C I D - Hil 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Peter Townsend v Thomas Pennystone, Richard Osbasson, Charles Noell, William Cotterel et al 
    • Deponents: Robert Townesend of Cassington Oxfordshire yeoman aged 60 and upwards, Nicholas Lawnce farmer aged 47, John Barnecott mason aged 32, Henry Savoige glover aged 60, Roberte Browne yeoman aged 55, Jane Watkyns wife of George Watkyns aged 40, George Watkyns yeoman aged 40, John Kingstone yeoman aged 40, Jone Jones wife of Edward Jones aged 47, Agnes Westley widow aged 60, Roberte Cooper yeoman aged 53, all of Ensham [Eynsham] Oxfordshire, John Bentley Doctor of Physick of Christ Church in the University of Oxford aged 48, Peeter Manewe of the City of Oxford Oxfordshire surgeon aged 67
  • STAC 5/T11/8 - I D - 36 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Peter Townsend v Thomas Peneston, William Cottrell et al
  • STAC 7/30/37 - - - Oxfordshire - Peter Townsend v Thomas Peniston et al
  • STAC 7/30/38 - D - 27 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Townesende v Thomas Peniston et al

UV

W

Whichcoste v Cocks

  • STAC 5/W60/40 - B Dr - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Thomas Whitchcoste, Thomas Cocks v Richard Dobson et al
    • see TNA C 2/Eliz/W13/30 Thomas Whitchott and Thomas Cooke. v Richard Dobson and Richard Feather. Claim by purchase. The manor of Wheatley [Oxfordshire] and a messuage and oxgang of land, parcel of the demesnes of the said manor, purchased by the plaintiffs; an acre of land called Gregg Roide Acre, belonging to the said oxgang, is also mentioned
    • see also STAC Whichcot

Whittington v Wenman

  • STAC 5/W30/16 - B Dr - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whittington v William Wenman, John Whytyng et al
  • STAC 5/W47/26 - B A - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whittington v William Wenman
  • STAC 5/W9/33 - I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whittington v William Whenman
  • STAC 5/W54/10 - Rr - 34 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whittington v William Wenman, James Bullock et al
  • STAC 5/W19/38 - Rn - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whittingdon v William Wenman
  • STAC 5/W44/36 - D - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire, London - William Whyttington v John Yeve
    • see E 133/7/937 The Queen and William Whittington v. William Wenman. A lease of the farm of Alvescot sold by William Wenman to William Whittington. Alleged fraud on the part of Wenman. A suit in Chancery brought by John Stocke against Whittington to recover possessionof the said farm. A suit in Chancery commenced by Wenman against Whittington, for not delivering up a bond, entered into by him, to the said Whittington, and alleged to be satisfied. An information of usury exhibited by him against Whittington. An action for debt brought by Whittington against Wenman. London & Oxon. 32/33 Eliz. and TNA E 133/7/938 and TNA E 133/7/939
    • see also STAC Whittington

Whytton v Ryley

  • STAC 5/W1/8 - I D - 17 Eliz - Oxfordshire - George Whitton v William Ryley
  • STAC 5/W3/15 - B A Rn Rr - 16 Eliz - Oxfordshire - George Wytton v William Ryley
    • George Whitton of Woodstock co Oxon - STAC 5/W3/15
    • see also STAC Whitton

Woodstock Corporation v Whitton

  • STAC 5/W77/7 - B A - 25 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Mayors & Comonalty of Newe Woodstock, v George Whitton, Richard Lowe et al

XYZ

Yate v Blagrave

  • STAC 5/Y2/25 - B A I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, Richard Palmer v John Blagrave, William Reve et al
    • John Yate of Kencott, Oxon, James Hytche parson of Kencott & Richard Palmer of Kencott, yeoman. (dk)
  • STAC 5/Y3/13 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hitch et al v Edmond Fryers
  • STAC 5/Y1/27 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hytche, Richard Palmer v Edmond Fryers
  • STAC 5/Y2/17 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hitch et al v Edmond Friers, John Blagrave et al
  • STAC 5/Y1/40 - I D - 42 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate et al v Edmund Fryars et al

Yate v Fryers

  • STAC 5/Y2/25 - B A I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, Richard Palmer v John Blagrave, William Reve et al
  • STAC 5/Y3/13 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hitch et al v Edmond Fryers
  • STAC 5/Y1/27 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hytche, Richard Palmer v Edmond Fryers
  • STAC 5/Y2/17 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate, James Hitch et al v Edmond Friers, John Blagrave et al
  • STAC 5/Y1/40 - I D - 42 Eliz - Oxfordshire - John Yate et al v Edmund Fryars et al

Almoner

Almoner v Baker

  • STAC 5/A38/14 - B A - - Oxfordshire - Almoner v John Baker, Thomas Webbe
    • In re John Burley, late of Dedington in co Oxford.
    • see also STAC Baker

Almoner v Billing

  • STAC 5/A23/39 - B - 12 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v John Byllynge
    • one John Burley late of Dedington co Oxon, butcher the 10th day of April Anno 12 Eliz, in his own dwelling house at Dedington hanged himself, felo de se
  • STAC 5/A21/16 - A - Oxfordshire - Almoner v John Billinge

Almoner v Cox

  • STAC 5/A3/29 - B - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v Thomas Coxe
    • Felo de se at Adderbury Oxfordshire.
    • see also STAC Cox

Almoner v Huckvale

  • STAC 5/A23/19 - B - 16 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v Christopher Huckvale, John Meds
    • That whereas one Alice Tredwell late of Nether Heyford co Oxford about the 27th July Anno 16 Eliz, at Nether Heyford with a cart and horses drawing the same was slain, deodand
    • see also STAC Huckvale

Almoner v Ives

  • STAC 5/A6/5 - B - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v Paul Ives, Peter Ives, John Spencer et al
    • Thomas Ives of Great Milton co Oxon yeoman. felo de se
    • see also STAC Ives

Almoner v Land

  • STAC 5/A1/15 - B A - Oxfordshire - Mich 32 Eliz - Almoner v Richard Land
    • In re John Lande late of Midletonstonye [Middleton Stoney] co Oxon felo de se.
  • STAC 5/A6/35 - I D - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v Martin Laud, Richard Laud
    • Two sets of interrogatories for the Complainant. Deposition of Richard Lande.
    • Impr did your father John Lande wilfully as a felon of himself hange and destroy himself, yea or noe. What corn and cattle had he. Deposition of Richard Lande of Mydlelston [Middleton Stoney].
    • see also STAC Land

Almoner v Skinner

  • STAC 5/A5/39 - B A - Mich 21/22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v George Skynner, William Skynner, John Linnett, Margaret Darrell, Edward Welden
    • Elizabeth Byllinge late of Dadington Oxfordshire, felo de se.
  • STAC 5/A22/15 - I D - 22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v George Skynner et al
  • STAC 5/A13/29 - B A - 23 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v William Skynner

Almoner v Symonds

  • STAC 5/A17/31 - B - 8 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v Roger Symonds, Anthony Yeats et al
    • John Burley late of Dedenton [Deddington] co Oxford at Dedenton hanged himself felo de se.
    • see also STAC Symonds

Almoner v Talbot

  • STAC 5/A23/6 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v William Talbott, Paul Ives, John Spenser
    • Int: Whether did you know Thomas Ives late of Great Milton co Oxford yeoman and did he feloniously hang himself, felo de se. Deposition 1st June Anno 39 Eliz, Walter Talbot of Great Milton co Oxon husbandman aged 63, Paul Ives of Little Milton co Oxon husbandman aged 30, John Spenser of Little Milton joyner aged 40
  • STAC 5/A59/37 - A - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v William Talbott, Paul Ives et al

Almoner v Vaughan

  • STAC 5/A47/23 - B - 15 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v Morrice Vaughan
    • Adam Frannces of Aynesham, Oxon fell from his horse & drowned while crossing a river.(dk)

Attorney General

AG v Beckingham

  • STAC 7/10/13 - - - Oxfordshire - AG (Edward Coke) v William Beckingham alias Hicks et al
    • TNA Note: Pudlicott: Personating defendant's half-brother, William Beckingham heir in reversion to the manor.
    • This AG is Edward Coke.
    • see also STAC Beckingham

AG v Croker

  • STAC 5/A31/24 - B A Rn C I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v John Croker, John Goldsmith, Thomas Huggins et al
    • Bill, 3 answers, 1 set interrogatories, half a dozen depositions. Bill: Coke AG Whereas John Croker of Steple Barton [Steeple Barton] co Oxon esq. acknowledged a Statute Staple in Common Pleas
  • STAC 5/A1/3 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v John Croker, Thomas Huggins et al
    • Steple Barton in Oxfordshire.
  • STAC 5/A23/14 - I D - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v John Croker, Henry Croker et al

AG v Poore

  • STAC 5/A11/9 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v Francis Poor, William Freere
    • A lot of legible depositions. Francis Poore had enclosed certain ground in Blechesden [?Bletchingdon]
    • Deponent John Banister of Islippe co Oxford husbandman aged 60 years
  • STAC 5/A50/32 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v William Frere et al
    • Frere’s year as sheriff coincided with serious riots in the county caused by economic depression. He had made his Water Eaton estate profitable by ditching and draining, and the villagers claimed he had enclosed common land. A witness examined in January 1597, after the disturbances had been suppressed, stated that Frere had ‘destroyed the whole town of Water Eaton’, and admitted that the rioters had intended to ‘spoil’ his house. The attorney-general brought an enclosure case against Frere and others in the Star Chamber, still unsettled in February 1598, with Frere still claiming that the district had profited by his improvements and that no one had suffered injury. ‘Frere, William’ by N M Fuidge in History of Parliament vols 1558-1603.
  • STAC 5/A33/31 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v Philip Poore, Thomas Longe, Thomas Martyn et al

AG v Trensham

  • STAC 5/A13/36 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v Thomas Tresham, Edmund Ludlow et al
  • STAC 5/A49/7 - A C - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - AG v Thomas Isham et al
    • STAC 5/A13/36; STAC 5/A49/7 cited in John E Martin, Feudalism to capitalism: peasant and landlord in English agrarian development, Palgrave, 1983. Oxfordshire. Related to an abortive uprising in 1597.
    • see also STAC Tresham


Palmer's cumulative totals of Star Chamber fines preserved in the E159s (rp)

  • TNA E159/343 Easter Term, 3 Elizabeth. Fine paid 9 May 1561
    • From Thomas Lyons de Langley, Oxon, gent, for a fine for riot: 53s 4d.
  • TNA E159/364 Michaelmas Term, 14-15 Elizabeth. Fine paid
    • From Andrew Clarke de Clanfield, Oxon, husbandman: 20s.
    • From John Bennett de Clanfield, Oxon, husbandman: 20s.
    • From John Spernewycke de Clanfield, Oxon, husbandman: 20s.
    • From Drugo Turnour de Clanfield, Oxon, husbandman: 20s.
    • From Richard Wykes, son of John Wykes, de Clanfield, Oxon: 20s.
    • From James Wykes, son of John Wykes abovesaid, de Clanfield, Oxon: 20s.
    • From Christofer Kempster de Clanfield, Oxon: 20s.
    • From John Pawling de Clanfield, Oxon: 20s.
  • TNA E159/367 Trinity Term, 16 Elizabeth. Fine paid
    • From Gerrard Croker de Steeple Barton, Oxon: £5.
    • From Christofer Atkinson, servant to the same Gerrard: 40s.
    • From George Geves de Hethroppe, Oxon: 40s.
    • From Thomas Taylor de Hook Norton, Oxon: 40s.
    • From Robert Hamwell de Steeple Barton, Oxon: 40s.
  • TNA E159/373 Trinity Term, 19 Elizabeth. Fine paid
    • From Simon Harcourte de Staunton Harcourte, Oxon, armiger: £200.
  • TNA E159/379 Easter Term, 22 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1580
    • From Walter Harcourte de Staunton Harcourte, Oxon, armiger: 500 marks.
  • TNA E159/379 Easter Term, 22 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1584
    • From Nicholas Cubbeage de Horton, Oxon: £5.
    • From Thomas Carter de Horton, Oxon: £5.
    • From John Chilton de Horton, Oxon: £5.
    • From Vincent Perryn de Horton, Oxon: 40s.
  • TNA E159/406 Michaelmas Term, 35-36 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1594
    • From Ralph Gobbatt de Whateley, Oxon, yeoman: £40.
  • TNA E159/412 Michaelmas Terms, 38-39 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1596
    • From Thomas Peniston de Evensham, Oxon, armiger: £10.
    • From Peter Townsend de Evensham, Oxon: £5.
  • TNA E159/413 Easter Term, 39 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1597
    • From Abel Fulwell de Lawnton, Oxon: £5.
    • From Edward Cowelsborne de Lawnton, Oxon: £5.
    • From John Whatley de Lawnton, Oxon: £5.
  • TNA E159/419 Michaelmas Term, 41-42 Michaelmas and Hilary Term 42 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1599
    • From John Crooker de Steeple Barton, Oxon, armiger: £200.
    • From Thomas Huggins of the City of London, gent: £100.
    • From Henry Croker de Steeple Barton, Oxon: £20.
    • From John Soper de Steeple Barton, Oxon: £10.
    • From John Goldsmyth de Steeple barton, Oxon: £10.
  • TNA E159/421 Trinity Term, 43 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1601
    • From John Bonner de Swarford, Oxon, gent: 100 marks.
    • From William Bonner de Swarford, Oxon, gent: 100 marks.
  • TNA E159/421 Trinity Term, 43 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1601
    • From John Croker de Staple Barton, Oxon, armiger: £20.
    • From John Bonner de Swarford, Oxon: £5.
    • From William Mace de Hooke Norton, Oxon: 53s 4d.
    • From John Dee de Staple Barton, Oxon: 53s 4d.
  • TNA E159/421 Michaelmas Term, 43-44 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1601
    • From Thomas Heath de Shelfwell, Oxon, armiger: £20.

Possibilities

Dormer v Dormer

  • STAC 5/D35/27 - B Dr - 33 Eliz - - Jesper Dormer v Francis Dormer, John Littleton, Edward Sheldon et al
    • STAC 8/162/6 Joan Humphrye, late the wife of Lawrence Humphrye, DD, and Justine Dormer, late the wife of Jasper Dormer, son of John Dormer esq. v Ralph Sheldon esq of Becley, Worcestershire, Edward Sheldon his son and heir apparent, John Crocker esq, Edward Crowshawe gent, Thomas Robins alias Thomas Robertes, George Hannes, Daniel Chysnall (Chesnall), Thomas Missin, William Thornett, and others. Seizure of hay and grass from the manor of Barton Charcells, whereof plaintiffs Joan Humphrye and Justine Dormer own three-fourths for terms, the remainder being claimed by the said Ralph Sheldon and Edward Sheldon; assaults on said plaintiffs and their servants, seizure of firewood, cutting and carrying timber, etc. Oxfordshire. 1604.
    • see STAC Dormer

Luter v Webb

  • STAC 5/L3/3 - B Dr - 25 Eliz - - John Luter v Thomas Webb, Simon Wickham, Nicholas Allrich
    • see Webbe v Luter above
    • just possibly TNA C 2/Eliz/W3/38 Thomas Webbe. v Edward Andrews and John Luther. To be relieved against a recognizance entered into by the plaintiff respecting certain messuages and lands in Banbury, Oxfordshire, some time the estate of John Luther. 
    • see STAC Luter

Webbe v Luter

  • STAC 5/W20/16 - B A Rn Rr - 24 Eliz - - Thomas Webbe v John Luter
  • STAC 5/W42/19 - I D - 26 Eliz - - Thomas Webbe v John Luter
  • STAC 5/W32/24 - C I D - 26 Eliz - - Thomas Webbe v John Luter
  • STAC 5/W22/37 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Thomas Webbe v John Hutton
    • see Luter v Webb below
    • just possibly TNA C 2/Eliz/W3/38 Thomas Webbe. v Edward Andrews and John Luther. To be relieved against a recognizance entered into by the plaintiff respecting certain messuages and lands in Banbury, Oxfordshire, some time the estate of John Luther. 
    • see STAC Webb