Difference between revisions of "STAC co Norfolk"

From Waalt
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''' Norfolk '''  
 
''' Norfolk '''  
  
''' NOTA BENE  - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed. '''
+
NOTA BENE  - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
 
 
''' A '''
 
  
 
''' Aldham v Harvey '''  
 
''' Aldham v Harvey '''  
Line 52: Line 50:
 
*STAC 5/A42/19 - I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Artis v Robert Purdye, John Ashill
 
*STAC 5/A42/19 - I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Artis v Robert Purdye, John Ashill
 
*see also [[STAC Artis]]
 
*see also [[STAC Artis]]
 
''' Almoner '''
 
 
''' Almoner v Blundeville '''
 
*Andrew Green late of Catfeild Norfolk. Hanged himself. felo de se. STAC 5/A2/32
 
*STAC 5/A2/32 - B A - Hil 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v John Blundeville et uxor
 
*see also [[STAC Blundeville]]
 
 
''' Almoner '''
 
*STAC 5/A6/8 - B - 39 Eliz - Derbyshire, Norfolk - Almoner v William Lowecock
 
*Edmond Stephenson late of Dronfield co Derby gent felo de se. Drowned himself in Norfolk in a river near Norwich. STAC 5/A6/8
 
*see also [[STAC Lowcock]]
 
 
''' Almoner v Pleasants '''
 
*Richard Banges of the City of Norwich tanner drowned himself, felo de se. STAC 5/A4/33
 
*STAC 5/A4/33 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Pleasants, William Harebrowne, John Mingey, John Howes
 
*STAC 5/A39/8 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Plesaunce
 
*see also [[STAC Pleasants]]
 
 
''' Attorney General '''
 
 
''' AG v Abrahan '''
 
*STAC 5/A39/24 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Robert Abrahan
 
*see also [[STAC Abrahan]]
 
 
''' AG v Fryer '''
 
*STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
 
*STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - AG v Anthony Fryer
 
*STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford
 
*STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - - AG v Anthony Frise
 
*see also [[STAC Fryer]]
 
 
'''AG v Gresham and Clere '''
 
*Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich). STAC 5/A32/39
 
*Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.
 
*STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Cleare
 
*STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
 
**Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General
 
**Answer of Edward Clere.
 
**Answer of Thomas Sego
 
**Demurrer of William Gressham
 
*STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al
 
*see also [[STAC Clere]]
 
 
''' AG v Heveningham '''
 
*Interrogatories to be ministered to Sir Arthur Heveningham knight on the part and behalf of HM. Imp did not the Lords of HM most hon PC about the one and thirty yeare of HM raygne direct ther letters to you Sir Arthur Heveningham, Sir Edward Cleer, Sir Robert Southwell knights, Thomas Farmore, William Rugge and Charles Cornwales esquires to examine and ende a cause betwene Thomas Thwayte of Hardingham in Norfolk esq & Richard Thwaites one of the younger sons of the said Thomas of the one parte and Antony Thwayte eldest son of the said Thomas & Francis the wife of the said Anthony on the other parte according to equitie etc. STAC 5/A6/25
 
*STAC 5/A6/25 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Sir Arthur Hevenham
 
*see also [[STAC Heveningham]]
 
 
''' AG v Thwaites '''
 
*STAC 5/A6/27 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Bridget Thwaits, Thomas Cooper, Robert Cooper
 
*Examinations taken at Hardingham co Norfolk 25 Sept 40 Eliz before Danyell Rieve DD, Martyn Sidley esq, Thomas Thetford esq [in the case] between William Terrold, Richard Thwaite et al Defs and Edward Cooke AG compl. Interrogatories to be ministered to Bridgett Thwaites widdowe Thomas Cooper yeoman, Robert Cooper yeoman on the part of William Terrold, Richard Thwaites and Thomas Amyas, three of the defs to the information of Edward Cooke AG. Depostion of Thomas Cowper of Depeham co Norfolk aged 60: that he hath heard that there were letters directed to certain knights and esquires in the said county from the lords of HM PC authorizing thaen therby to here and determine all matters of controversy that were then betwene Thomas Thwaites of Hardingham and Anthony his eldest sonne. STAC 5/A6/27
 
*see also [[STAC Thwaits]]
 
 
''' B '''
 
  
 
''' Baldrey v Ward '''  
 
''' Baldrey v Ward '''  
Line 138: Line 81:
 
*STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
 
*STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
 
*see also [[STAC Blenerhasset]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Blenerhasset]]  
 
''' C '''
 
  
 
''' Cobbe v Radcliffe '''  
 
''' Cobbe v Radcliffe '''  
Line 203: Line 144:
 
*STAC 5/C3/5 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Curteis v Edmond Evance, Thomas Burton
 
*STAC 5/C3/5 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Curteis v Edmond Evance, Thomas Burton
 
*see also [[STAC Curtis]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Curtis]]  
 
''' D '''
 
  
 
''' Dereham v Barton '''  
 
''' Dereham v Barton '''  
Line 214: Line 153:
 
*STAC 7/20/25 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Derham v Peter Barton et al
 
*STAC 7/20/25 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Derham v Peter Barton et al
 
*see also [[STAC Dereham]]
 
*see also [[STAC Dereham]]
 
''' E '''
 
  
 
''' Eden v Downing '''
 
''' Eden v Downing '''
Thomas Edon of Martham co Norfolk yeoman. Whereas the Dean and Chapter of Norwich owned the rectory of Martham and the parsonage house. 21 year lease to complainant.  Answer of William Downinge gent. Now so it is may it please your most excellent Majesty that Wm Downing gent, Edward Browne, Simonde Sippens, Richard Tompson, and Robert Buclingham and divers other persons to your said subject unknown, hot [having] the fear of god before their eis nor any dutiful regard to your Majesties good and godlie laws upon the 9th day of may now last passed did in warlike disorderlie and unlawfull manner assemble and bande themsellves together at Martham. And upon the said day with force and arms that is to say with swords halberts morris pykes piked staves and divers other weapons as well invasive as defensive into the said messuage called the parsonage house forcible riotously and unlawfully did break and enter. And one Anthony Edon and one Richarde Wattes then [being in] the said messuage by the appointment and commandment of your said subject did beat wound and evell intreat. STAC 5/E1/14
+
*Thomas Edon of Martham co Norfolk yeoman. Whereas the Dean and Chapter of Norwich owned the rectory of Martham and the parsonage house. 21 year lease to complainant.  Answer of William Downinge gent. Now so it is may it please your most excellent Majesty that Wm Downing gent, Edward Browne, Simonde Sippens, Richard Tompson, and Robert Buclingham and divers other persons to your said subject unknown, hot [having] the fear of god before their eis nor any dutiful regard to your Majesties good and godlie laws upon the 9th day of may now last passed did in warlike disorderlie and unlawfull manner assemble and bande themsellves together at Martham. And upon the said day with force and arms that is to say with swords halberts morris pykes piked staves and divers other weapons as well invasive as defensive into the said messuage called the parsonage house forcible riotously and unlawfully did break and enter. And one Anthony Edon and one Richarde Wattes then [being in] the said messuage by the appointment and commandment of your said subject did beat wound and evell intreat. STAC 5/E1/14
 
*STAC 5/E15/33 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Eden v William Downing Edward Browne et al
 
*STAC 5/E15/33 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Eden v William Downing Edward Browne et al
 
*STAC 5/E11/38 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v William Doewning, Henry Wilcocks, Robert Hall et al  
 
*STAC 5/E11/38 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v William Doewning, Henry Wilcocks, Robert Hall et al  
Line 232: Line 169:
 
*STAC 5/E9/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Evans v Edmond Newby et al
 
*STAC 5/E9/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Evans v Edmond Newby et al
 
*see also [[STAC Evans]]
 
*see also [[STAC Evans]]
 
''' F '''
 
  
 
''' Farmor v Haydon '''
 
''' Farmor v Haydon '''
Line 311: Line 246:
 
*see also [[STAC Fuller]]
 
*see also [[STAC Fuller]]
  
''' G '''  
+
''' Gurboldsham v Muskett '''
 +
*All Saints Garboldisham, Norfolk. STAC 5/G14/1
 +
*STAC 5/G14/1 - B - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - The Parishioners of Gurboldsham all Saints, v William Muskett, Simon Muskett.
 
*see also [[STAC Garboldisham]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Garboldisham]]  
*see also [[STAC Goldman]]
+
 
*see also [[STAC Gibson]]
+
''' Howard v Mulley '''
''' H '''  
+
*TNA Notes: Kenninghall: Resistance to a distress. STAC 7/3/7
*see also [[STAC Hall]]
+
*STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon
*see also [[STAC Harward]]
 
 
*see also [[STAC Howard]]
 
*see also [[STAC Howard]]
 +
 +
''' Hunt v Whiting '''
 +
*TNA Note: Gimingham: Forcible entry on lands held of the manor. STAC 7/12/37
 +
*STAC 5/H60/31 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting, John Browne et al
 +
*STAC 5/H18/23 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting
 +
*STAC 5/H28/13 - I D - 10 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Wytty et al
 +
*STAC 7/12/37 - - - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Windam, Thomas Wyttye, Walter Whiting, Robert Howse et al
 
*see also [[STAC Hunt]]
 
*see also [[STAC Hunt]]
''' IJ '''  
+
 
 +
''' Ireland v Wright and Bright '''
 +
*The Complainant was in the Fleet prison at the suit of Thomas Tooley on a forged bond. Deposition of Thomas Bleverhassell of the City of Norwich. STAC 5/J3/20
 +
*STAC 5/J7/28 - B A - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
 +
*STAC 5/J3/20 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
 +
*STAC 5/J15/39 - Rn - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Peter Bright, Thomas Wright, Thomas Buxley
 +
*STAC 5/J20/32 - I D - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Thomas Wright, Peter Bright et al
 +
*STAC 5/J22/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v John Puxley, Thomas Wright et al
 
*see also [[STAC Ireland]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Ireland]]  
 +
 +
''' Jennor v Fairfax '''
 +
*Francis Jennor is an infant. Margaret Jennor his mother acts for him. STAC 5/J4/13
 +
*STAC 5/J7/30 - B A Rn - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v Thomas Jennor, John Jennor, William Fayrefax
 +
*STAC 5/J4/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v William Fairfax et al
 +
*STAC 5/J14/30 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Jennor, Margery Jennor v William Raynface
 
*see also [[STAC Jenner]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Jenner]]  
*see also  [[STAC Jubey]]
+
 
 +
''' Jervis v Tubbard '''
 +
*Messuage in Felbrigge Norfolk. STAC 5/J3/16
 +
*STAC 5/J3/16 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervys, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henbury
 +
*STAC 5/J7/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - William Jervis, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henburye
 +
*STAC 5/J13/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - William Jearvens v Christopher Henbery, Edward Tubberd
 
*see also [[STAC Jervais]]
 
*see also [[STAC Jervais]]
 +
 +
''' Johnson v Smyth '''
 +
*Thomas Johnson of Old Buckenham and Dorothie his wife. STAC 5/J3/28
 +
*STAC 5/J3/28 - B - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Johnson v Thomas Smyth, Jacob Preston et Mary uxor, Robert Jolly, Thomas Haplye, John Pryor, Henry Bacon, William Preston, Thomas Mendham, Abraham Preston, Isaac Preston, Richard Lytleproude, Adam Page.
 
*see also [[STAC Johnson]]
 
*see also [[STAC Johnson]]
*see also [[STAC Jermyn]]
+
 
''' K '''  
+
''' Jubye v Youngman '''
 +
*Deposition of Thomas Youngman of Carleton Norfolk and others. STAC 5/J4/5
 +
*STAC 5/J1/3 - B A - Mich 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jubye v Thomas Youngeman, William Jubye, John Sherwyn, William Yongeman
 +
*STAC 5/J4/5 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jewbye v William Yongeman, William Jewbye
 +
*STAC 5/J15/33 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jewbie v Thomas Youngman, William Youngman, William Jewbie
 +
*see also [[STAC Jubey]]  
 +
 
 +
''' Killingtree v Pell '''
 +
*Wm Killingtree mayor of your highness town of Kings Lynne in the county of Norfolk. STAC 5/K1/3
 +
*STAC 5/K1/3 - B A Rn - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Killingtree, Robert Jervis, John Grigby, George Baker, Francis Shaxton, Thomas Overend v John Pell, Geofery Pell, Valentine Pell, Thomas Blesbie, Henry Violet, William Woolman, Richard Walters, Thomas Maye, Christopher Fisher, Robert Hulliard, Thomas Fowell, Thomas Haughton
 +
*STAC 5/K8/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - The Mayor of Kings Lynn  v John Pell Jeffrey Pell, Christopher Fisher et al
 
*see also [[STAC Killingtree]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Killingtree]]  
 +
 +
''' Knyvett v Dixon '''
 +
*Depositions taken in Norwich. STAC 5/K4/34
 +
*STAC 5/K8/32 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Thomas Knyvett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
 +
*STAC 5/K5/30 - I D - 24 Eliz - Thomas Knivett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
 +
*STAC 5/K4/34 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Richard Ringwood, Ralph Dixon et al
 
*see also [[STAC Knivett]]
 
*see also [[STAC Knivett]]
 +
 +
''' Knyvett v Burgess and Ryder '''
 +
*Sir Thomas Knivett of Asshwelthorpe Hall Norfolk. STAC 5/K2/8
 +
*STAC 5/K2/8 - B A I D - Easter 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knivett v John Botye, John Burge Jr, William Rider, Robert Keene, George Browne
 +
*STAC 5/K3/5 - I D - 32 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v Thomas Burgess, John Burgess et al
 +
*STAC 5/K7/12 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burghe, William Rider et al
 +
*STAC 5/K14/32 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burgess, William Ryder et al
 +
*STAC 5/K6/34 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knevett v John Booties Sr, William Ryder
 +
*see also [[STAC Knivett]]
 +
*
 
''' L '''  
 
''' L '''  
 
*
 
*
''' M '''  
+
''' Marsham v Brampton '''
 +
*STAC 5/M13/13 - B A - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - The inhabitants of the town of Marsham v James Brampton, William Gedney et al
 
*see also [[STAC Marsham]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Marsham]]  
*see also [[STAC Moore]]
+
*
 
''' N '''  
 
''' N '''  
 
*
 
*
 
''' O '''  
 
''' O '''  
 
*
 
*
''' P '''  
+
''' Parfrey v Stokes '''
*see also [[STAC Pleasants]]
+
*TNA Note: Wimbotsham: Tithe corn. STAC 7/14/18
 +
*STAC 5/P46/39 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes et al
 +
*STAC 5/P53/17 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes
 +
*STAC 5/P13/26 - B A - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfraye v Thomas Stokes et al
 +
*STAC 5/P37/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes, Christopher Stokes
 +
*STAC 7/14/18 - - - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes et al
 
*see also [[STAC Purefey]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Purefey]]  
*see also [[STAC Pigeon]]
+
*
*see also [[STAC Perryman]]
 
 
''' Q '''  
 
''' Q '''  
 
*
 
*
''' R '''  
+
''' Reade v Grren and Britton '''  
 +
*TNA Note: Forgery of a writ removing a suit to Westminster from the manorial court of Gimingham. STAC 7/5/4
 +
*STAC 5/R35/17 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Humfry Britton
 +
*STAC 7/5/4 - - - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Thomas Grene, Humphrey Bretten
 
*see also [[STAC Read]]
 
*see also [[STAC Read]]
''' S '''  
+
 
*
+
''' Sporeley v Makender '''
''' T '''  
+
*TNA Note: Wolverton and Lynn: Forcible dispute as to gathering mussels, and false imprisonment. STAC 7/5/15
*see also [[STAC Terrold]]  
+
*STAC 5/W16/28 - I D - 1 Eliz - Inhabitants of Woolverton v Inhabitants of Lynn
 +
*STAC 7/5/15 - - - Lincolnshire - Roger Sporeley, Alexander Tebye, John Geyges et al inhabitants of Wolverton v John Makender, Ralph Downes, Edward Andrye, Thomas Ladyman et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Wolverton]] and see also [[STAC Sporeley]]
 +
 
 +
''' Taverner v Thompson '''
 +
*STAC 7/15/44 - TNA Note: Perjury in the Exchequer on behalf of Lord Cromwell, in a suit for the manors of North Elmham and Beetley. Roger Taverner, deputy surveyor of the Queen's woods
 +
*STAC 5/T35/30 - B A - 16 Eliz - Roger Taverner v Thomas Lusher, Margaret Thompson et al
 +
*STAC 7/15/44 - - - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Margery Tompson et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Taverner]]
 +
 
 +
''' Thetford Corporation v Bassingwaite '''
 +
*STAC 5/T37/37 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Mayor and Burgesses of Thetford v John Bassingwayte, Antony Freere et al
 
*see also [[STAC Thetford]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Thetford]]  
 +
 +
''' Tymperley v Themilthorpe '''
 +
*TNA Note: Will of Bartram Themilthorpe of Worstead. STAC 7/7/30
 +
*STAC 5/T17/29 - Rn  - 38 Eliz - Henry Tympley v Thomas Thinilthorpe
 +
*STAC 7/7/30 - - - Norfolk - Henry Tymperley, v Thomas Themilthorpe, John Potter
 
*see also [[STAC Timperley]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Timperley]]  
 +
 +
''' Trindle v Woodhouse '''
 +
*TNA Note: Carlton etc: Tenancy in first deft's manor. STAC 7/15/50
 +
*STAC 5/T34/31 - B - 22 Eliz - Agnes Trundell, Thomas Trundell v Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
 +
*STAC 5/T26/5 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Agnes Tryndle, Thomas Tryndle v Sir Roger Woodhouse
 +
*STAC 5/T18/27 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Agnes Tryndell, Thomas Tryndell v Sir Roger Woodehouse, Henry Blake
 +
*STAC 5/T13/40 - I D - 23 Eliz - Thomas Tryndell et uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
 +
*STAC 7/15/50 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Trundell, et Agnes uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
 
*see also [[STAC Trindle]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Trindle]]  
*see also [[STAC Taverner]]
+
*
 
''' UV '''  
 
''' UV '''  
 
*
 
*
''' W '''  
+
''' Whitney v Gest '''
 +
*Thetford, Norfolk. Robert Whitney, Gent. Interrogatories of John Gest of Thetford, Norfolk and William Tompson of Thetford, shoemaker. STAC 5/W56/39
 +
*STAC 5/W32/20 - B - - Robert Whitney v John Geste, William Tompson et al
 +
*STAC 5/W56/39 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v Lawrence Fytt, William Thompson
 +
*STAC 5/W29/1 - A Rn C I D - 29 Eliz - Robert Whitney v William Thompson, Lawrence Fytt et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Whitney]]
 +
 
 +
''' Woodhouse v Kett '''
 +
*TNA Note: Mileham and Beeston: Maintenance of a drain and bridge on the manor, common of pasture. STAC 7/16/22
 +
*STAC 5/W22/13 - B A - 17 Eliz - Roger Woodhowse v Valentine Kett
 +
*STAC 7/16/22 - - - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Richard Kett, Hilary Baly et al
 +
*STAC 5/W3/16 - B A Rn C I D - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Knyght, Valentine Knyght alias Kett, John Nevell, William Chace, Nicholas Banister et al
 +
*STAC 5/W16/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Valentine Kett
 +
*STAC 5/W18/14 - Rn - 23 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Botie, John Nevell et al
 +
*STAC 5/W4/26 - B A Rr - Trin 23 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Henry Knevett, Edmund Knevett, Anthony Knevett, John Neville, Richard Watts, William Guilder et al
 
*see also [[STAC Woodhouse]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Woodhouse]]  
*see also [[STAC Whitney]]
+
*
*see also [[STAC Whitehand]]
 
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
 
 
''' X '''  
 
''' X '''  
 
*
 
*
''' Y '''  
+
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Bettys '''
 +
*STAC 5/Y2/4 - B - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Jurats and Burgesses of Yarmouth v Thomas Bettys, John Pidgeon et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
 +
 
 +
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Gunvile '''
 +
*STAC 5/B103/16 - B A Rn - 12 Eliz - John Burforth, Ambrose Bullard v Henry Gunoyle et al
 +
*STAC 5/Y2/11 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvile et al
 +
*STAC 5/Y4/2 - Rn - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvyle
 +
*STAC 5/U3/2 - C I D - 13 Eliz - John Uffar, Ambrose Bullward v Henry Gunvyle, Robert Candler et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
 +
 
 +
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Wylde '''
 +
*STAC 5/Y1/14 - B Dr - Hil 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Comomalty of Yarmouth, v William Wylde, John Wylde, Nathaniell Arnold, Matthew Fullgood, Robert Ward et al
 
*see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
 
*see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
 +
*
 
''' Z '''  
 
''' Z '''  
 
*
 
*
 +
''' Almoner '''
 +
 +
''' Almoner v Blundeville '''
 +
*Andrew Green late of Catfeild Norfolk. Hanged himself. felo de se. STAC 5/A2/32
 +
*STAC 5/A2/32 - B A - Hil 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v John Blundeville et uxor
 +
*see also [[STAC Blundeville]]
 +
 +
‘’' Almoner v Goldman '''
 +
*One Steven Meade late of Rewton or Beston neare unto the sea side in Norfolk. felo de se. STAC 5/A3/36
 +
*STAC 5/A3/36 - B A - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v Robert Goldman
 +
*see also [[STAC Goldman]]
 +
 +
''' Almoner v Hall '''
 +
*Henry Shrympling and Adame Elger late of Tyrinton St Jones [Terrington St Johns] in Norfolk. both felo de se. STAC 5/A3/34
 +
*STAC 5/A3/34 - B -  - Norfolk - Almoner v William Hall, Francis Leggate
 +
*see also [[STAC Hall]]
 +
 +
''' Almoner v Lowcock '''
 +
*STAC 5/A6/8 - B - 39 Eliz - Derbyshire, Norfolk - Almoner v William Lowecock
 +
*Edmond Stephenson late of Dronfield co Derby gent felo de se. Drowned himself in Norfolk in a river near Norwich. STAC 5/A6/8
 +
*see also [[STAC Lowcock]]
 +
 +
''' Almoner v Moore '''
 +
*STAC 7/1/10 - TNA Note: Hingham: Goods of [blank] Forde, suicide
 +
*STAC 7/1/10 - - - Norfolk - Almoner (Edmund, bishop of Rochester) v Thomas Moore
 +
*see also [[STAC Moore]]
 +
 +
''' Almoner v Perryman '''
 +
*Walter Vyncent late of Esson [? Easton] in Norfolk felo de se. STAC 5/A5/18
 +
*STAC 5/A5/18 - B A - - Norfolk - Almoner v Hugh Perryman
 +
*see also [[STAC Perryman]]
 +
 +
''' Almoner v Pleasants '''
 +
*Bond by Richard Banges of Norwich to John Mingey of Norwich apothecary. STAC 5/A39/8
 +
*Richard Banges of the City of Norwich tanner drowned himself, felo de se. STAC 5/A4/33
 +
*STAC 5/A4/33 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Pleasants, William Harebrowne, John Mingey, John Howes
 +
*STAC 5/A39/8 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Plesaunce
 +
*see also [[STAC Pleasants]]
 +
 +
''' Attorney General '''
 +
 +
''' AG v Abrahan '''
 +
*STAC 5/A39/24 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Robert Abrahan
 +
*see also [[STAC Abrahan]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Fryer '''
 +
*STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
 +
*STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - AG v Anthony Fryer
 +
*STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford
 +
*STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - - AG v Anthony Frise
 +
*see also [[STAC Fryer]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Gresham and Clere '''
 +
*Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich). STAC 5/A32/39
 +
*Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.
 +
*STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Cleare
 +
*STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
 +
**Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General
 +
**Answer of Edward Clere.
 +
**Answer of Thomas Sego
 +
**Demurrer of William Gressham
 +
*STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Clere]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Gibson '''
 +
*Norwich, Eight Answers. STAC 5/A32/30
 +
*STAC 5/A32/30 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gibson et uxor, Judeth Wilson, John Thompson, John Beamond, Simon Davye et al
 +
*STAC 5/A26/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - AG v Margaret Gybson et al
 +
*STAC 5/A19/32 - I -  - AG v Henry Gybson
 +
*see also [[STAC Gibson]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Harward '''
 +
*In re Clement Herward late of Alborough in co Norfolk deceased. STAC 5/A39/2
 +
*Account of Attorney General v Thomas Harward, Alborough, Norfolk (forgery 38 Eliz) in [https://archive.org/stream/cu31924069587255#page/n89/mode/2up Les reportes del cases in Camera Stellata, 1593 to 1609 from the original ms. of John Hawarde edited by William Paley Baildon Published 1894, p. 28 - 29 & 30]
 +
*STAC 5/A25/28 - I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward et al
 +
*STAC 5/A39/2 - I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward
 +
*STAC 5/A32/8 - I D - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward et al
 +
*STAC 5/A48/38 - I D - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward
 +
*STAC 5/A41/5 - Rn - Mich 34/35 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harold alias Harward
 +
*STAC 5/A40/27 - B A C I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward et uxor
 +
*see also [[STAC Harward]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Heveningham '''
 +
*Interrogatories to be ministered to Sir Arthur Heveningham knight on the part and behalf of HM. Imp did not the Lords of HM most hon PC about the one and thirty yeare of HM raygne direct ther letters to you Sir Arthur Heveningham, Sir Edward Cleer, Sir Robert Southwell knights, Thomas Farmore, William Rugge and Charles Cornwales esquires to examine and ende a cause betwene Thomas Thwayte of Hardingham in Norfolk esq & Richard Thwaites one of the younger sons of the said Thomas of the one parte and Antony Thwayte eldest son of the said Thomas & Francis the wife of the said Anthony on the other parte according to equitie etc. STAC 5/A6/25
 +
*STAC 5/A6/25 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Sir Arthur Hevenham
 +
*see also [[STAC Heveningham]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Jermyn '''
 +
*STAC 5/A2/40 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmond Jermyn, Robert Bateman, Rowland Thompson, Thomas Worth et al
 +
*STAC 5/A57/31 - B A - - AG v Francis Jermyne, Richard Jones et al
 +
*STAC 5/A15/8 - I D - 8 Eliz - AG v Francis Jermye et al
 +
*STAC 5/A11/16 - A - 40 Eliz - AG v Edmund Jermyn et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Jermyn]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Pigeon '''
 +
*Wymondham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A55/37
 +
*STAC 5/A55/37 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon et al
 +
*STAC 5/A17/8 - Rn - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
 +
*STAC 5/A22/29 - Rr - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
 +
*STAC 5/A28/16 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, Richard Witherley, John Parker et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Pigeon]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Terrold '''
 +
*STAC 5/A1/39 - A Rn C I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaits, Thomas Amides, William Terold
 +
*STAC 5/A46/5 - C I D - 40 Eliz- AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaytes, Thomas Amyas et al
 +
*STAC 7/17/55 - - - AG v William Terolde et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Terrold]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Thwaites '''
 +
*STAC 5/A6/27 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Bridget Thwaits, Thomas Cooper, Robert Cooper
 +
*Examinations taken at Hardingham co Norfolk 25 Sept 40 Eliz before Danyell Rieve DD, Martyn Sidley esq, Thomas Thetford esq [in the case] between William Terrold, Richard Thwaite et al Defs and Edward Cooke AG compl. Interrogatories to be ministered to Bridgett Thwaites widdowe Thomas Cooper yeoman, Robert Cooper yeoman on the part of William Terrold, Richard Thwaites and Thomas Amyas, three of the defs to the information of Edward Cooke AG. Depostion of Thomas Cowper of Depeham co Norfolk aged 60: that he hath heard that there were letters directed to certain knights and esquires in the said county from the lords of HM PC authorizing thaen therby to here and determine all matters of controversy that were then betwene Thomas Thwaites of Hardingham and Anthony his eldest sonne. STAC 5/A6/27
 +
*see also [[STAC Thwaits]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Wharton '''
 +
*Ingrossing of grain, many many answers including one by Robert Pooke citizen and aldermen of Norwich. STAC 5/A55/36
 +
*STAC 5/A8/22 - I - 39 Eliz - AG v Martin Wharton, Thomas Norfor et al
 +
*STAC 5/A55/36 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martyn Wharton et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
 +
 +
''' AG v Whitehand '''
 +
*TNA Note: Forgery of warrants and bonds. STAC 7/1/5
 +
*STAC 5/A47/36 - I D - 44 Eliz - AG v Ralfe Whithand
 +
*STAC 5/A44/14 - I D - 45 Eliz - AG v Raphe Whitehand, John Clybury
 +
*STAC 7/1/5 - - - Norfolk - AG (Edward Coke) v Ralph Whitehand, Edward Ralf
 +
*see also [[STAC Whitehand]]

Revision as of 17:53, 7 February 2016

Norfolk

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

Aldham v Harvey

  • Wramplingham co Norfolk. STAC 5/A4/17
  • STAC 5/A4/17 - B A - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Aldham v John Harvye, Anthony Bennyt, Thomas Hallyet et al
  • STAC 5/A16 /11 - I D - 24 Eliz - Henry Aldehn v John Harvy
  • see also STAC Aldham

Allen v Playford

  • Thomas Aleyn of Northrepps co Norfolk. STAC 5/A52/8
  • STAC 5/A52/8 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allen v Henry Playford et al
  • STAC 5/A7/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Aleyn v Henry Playforth et al, John Atkyns, William Perker et al
  • see also STAC Allen

Allyson v Richman

  • Thomas Alyson of Aylesham co Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/2
  • STAC 5/A2/2 - B Dr - Easter 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allyson v Thomas Richman, George Thomson
  • see also STAC Allyson

Anguish v Nicholas

  • Walsingham in the co of Norfolk. STAC 5/A1/30
  • STAC 5/A47/8 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Eme Angwishe v Agnes Nicholas, John Rame et al
  • STAC 5/A53/14 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v Agnes Nicholas, Rame, John Craddock et al
  • STAC 5/A1/30 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v William Nicholas
  • STAC 5/A20 /2 - Rr - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Angus v Anne Nicholas, William Nicholas et al
  • see also STAC Anguish

Armiger v Whitney

  • Possibly Burnham and [King's] Lynne, Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/4
  • STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
  • STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al
  • see also STAC Armiger

Armiger v Barber

  • William Arminger the elder of North Creake in Norfolk gentleman. In re the manor of Hillham in Holkham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A3/26
  • STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al
  • STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - - William Armiger v John Barber et al
  • STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
  • STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al
  • see also STAC Armiger

Artis v Ashill

  • John Ashill clerk def parson of Bodney co Norfolk. STAC 5/A6/24
  • STAC 5/A16/18 - B A Rn I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Antys v John Ashyll et al
  • STAC 5/A6/24 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill
  • STAC 5/A43/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
  • STAC 5/A24/4 - I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
  • STAC 5/A42/19 - I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Artis v Robert Purdye, John Ashill
  • see also STAC Artis

Baldrey v Ward

  • Theft of crop of peas. Rednall, Norfolk. John Baldrye v Thomas Warde of Rednall, tanner & Margery his wife; Anne Myddaye of Rednall, spinster; John Lawne & Wyllm Palmer of Southreps, yeoman. STAC/B67/4
  • STAC 5/B67/4 - B - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - John Baldrye v Margaret Warde,Thomas Warde, William Palmer
  • see also STAC Baldrey

Becker v Neave

  • Norfolk. Interrogatories to be administered on behalf of Roose Becker complt against Wyllm Neale . . . Thomas Bretton, Thomas Neale, Thomas Becker & Elinor his wife, Thomas Wyth.., John Alyson, Rauffe Symes & Edmund Crell.. defts. Complt is widow of Wyllm Becker of ?Suttyngton?, Norfolk. STAC 5/B67/18
  • STAC 5/B7/12 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - - Rose Becker v William Neve, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Becker et al
  • STAC 5/B67/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Roose Becker v Thomas Neave, William Neave, Thomas Bretton
  • see also STAC Becker

Beckham v Halman and Crane

  • Fronsham, Norfolk. Refers to writ of ravishment of ward from High Court of Chancery directed to the Shreve of Norfolk against the brothers Richard & Henrye Beckham, and a suit tried at Norwich Assizes by Robert Crane against Richard & Henrye Beckham concerning the wardship of Sara Futter, only daughter & heir of Rycharde Futter. Mention also of the death of Alice Futter, mother of Sara Futter. STAC 5/B68/2
  • STAC 5/B68/2 - B A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v [blank] Halman, Elizabeth Paynter et al
    • Bill of Richard Beckham of Little Frannsham, Norfolk. Defts Edmund Halman, Thomas Halman, John Halman, Robert Crane, Elizabeth Paynter.
    • Answers of Isabell (otherwise Elizabeth) Paynter widow to the bill of complaint of Richard Beckham.
    • Answers of Robarte Crane, Edmunde Halman, John Halman & Thomas Halman
  • STAC 5/B99/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v John Halman, Thomas Halrnan
  • STAC 5/B16/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
  • STAC 5/B103/9 - Rn - 34 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane, Edmund Halman et al
  • STAC 7/18/23 - - - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
  • see also STAC Beckham

Blenerhasset v Sayers

  • STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
  • STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
  • STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
  • STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
  • STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
  • see also STAC Blenerhasset

Cobbe v Radcliffe

  • Wolverton, Norfolk. Elizabeth Cobbe, widow. Trespass and destruction of property. Interrogatories administered on behalf of the plaintiff. STAC 10/2/7
  • STAC 5/C46/8 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe, Gyles Skeete et al
  • STAC 10/2/7 - I - - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe
  • see also STAC Cobbe

Cooke v Jewell

  • William Coke of Walcoote [Walcott] in Norfolk yeoman, two and a half acres of land in Estruston [East Ruston] Norfolk. STAC 5/C3/25
  • STAC 5/C3/25 - B C A - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - - William Coke v Edmund Jewell et uxor, Thomas Jewell
  • see also STAC Cooke

Cooper v Goose

  • Isaac Cooper of Yarmouth in Norfolk merchant. Inheritance dispute. STAC 5/C3/12
  • STAC 5/C3/12 - B A - Mich 44/45 Eliz - - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose, George Goose
  • STAC 5/C10/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - - John Cowper v William Goose, George Goose
  • STAC 10/2/4 - Rn - - - - Isaac Cooper v William Goose and George Goose
  • see also STAC Cooper

Coppin v Palmer

  • William Coppinge of Beddingham in Norfolk. STAC 5/C2/6
  • STAC 5/C2/6 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Felthrop, Robert Barker, Robert Gooche, Thomas Grimsbye et al
  • STAC 5/C64/16 - A Rn C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppin v Robert Palmer, William Jackson, Robert Barker et al
  • STAC 5/C29/38 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge et al v Robert Palmer, John Cunger, Thomas Grimsbye et al
  • STAC 5/C71/12 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Nelthorpe et al
  • see also STAC Coppin

Cornwallis v Gesh and Pinner

  • Charles Cornwaleys of Carowe in the County of the City of Norwich esquire. In re the manor of Kilverston in Norfolk. STAC 5/C1/24
  • TNA Note: Kilverston: Forcible dispute as to cutting furze, etc. STAC 7/11/11
  • STAC 5/C1/24 - B A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleys v Simon Gesh, John Pinner, John Smith, William Browett
  • STAC 7/11/11 - - - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleis v Simon Gest, John Pynner
  • STAC 5/C72/1 - B A - 39 Eliz - - Charles Conwallis v William Le Gris, Robert Cottrell
  • see also STAC Cornwallis

Cromwell v Tavernor

  • North Elmham, Norfolk. Referenced in "Custom Improvement and Anti-Improvement in Early Modern Britain" edited by Richard W. Hoyle, which also refers to related Chancery cases. STAC 5/C73/17; C35/9; C42/9; C58/5; C78/14
  • STAC 5/C17/9 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Crumwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
  • STAC 5/C73/17 - I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Camwell [Cromwell] v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C30/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor
  • STAC 5/C58/5 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C78/14 - I - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C73/3 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C45/36 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Crumwell v James Taverner et al
  • STAC 5/C32/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v John Browne
  • STAC 5/C38/21 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
  • STAC 5/C28/3 - I D - 23 Eliz - - Lord Cromwell v Edward Daulton, Val(entine) Hartoppe, Martyn Arden et al
  • STAC 5/C42/9 - B A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v Thomas Steward, John Taverner et al
  • STAC 5/C53/16 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Lord Crumwell v Thomas Steward
  • STAC 5/C74/14 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Lord Cromwell v Roger Townshend
  • see also STAC Cromwell see also STAC Taverner

Curdey v Skeet

  • William Curdy of Aldeburgh in Norfolk. STAC 5/C1/37
  • STAC 5/C1/37 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdy v John Skeete Sr, John Skette Jr, John Orrys, Richard Smyth
  • STAC 5/C48/21 - I - Norfolk - William Curdye v John Orrys, John Skete Sr, John Skete Jr
  • STAC 5/C19/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdys v Richard Smith
  • see also STAC Curdey

Curtis v Evance

  • Thomas Curteis of Lynn Regis Norfolk. STAC 5/C3/5
  • STAC 5/C3/5 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Curteis v Edmond Evance, Thomas Burton
  • see also STAC Curtis

Dereham v Barton

  • TNA Note: West Dereham: Affray. STAC 7/11/27
  • STAC 5/D21/8 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, Robert Edge, John Atkins
  • STAC 5/D36/17 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, John Atkins
  • STAC 5/D34/26 - C I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dearham v Peter Barton
  • STAC 7/11/27 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Deareham v Peter Barton, John Atkyns
  • STAC 7/20/25 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Derham v Peter Barton et al
  • see also STAC Dereham

Eden v Downing

  • Thomas Edon of Martham co Norfolk yeoman. Whereas the Dean and Chapter of Norwich owned the rectory of Martham and the parsonage house. 21 year lease to complainant. Answer of William Downinge gent. Now so it is may it please your most excellent Majesty that Wm Downing gent, Edward Browne, Simonde Sippens, Richard Tompson, and Robert Buclingham and divers other persons to your said subject unknown, hot [having] the fear of god before their eis nor any dutiful regard to your Majesties good and godlie laws upon the 9th day of may now last passed did in warlike disorderlie and unlawfull manner assemble and bande themsellves together at Martham. And upon the said day with force and arms that is to say with swords halberts morris pykes piked staves and divers other weapons as well invasive as defensive into the said messuage called the parsonage house forcible riotously and unlawfully did break and enter. And one Anthony Edon and one Richarde Wattes then [being in] the said messuage by the appointment and commandment of your said subject did beat wound and evell intreat. STAC 5/E1/14
  • STAC 5/E15/33 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Eden v William Downing Edward Browne et al
  • STAC 5/E11/38 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v William Doewning, Henry Wilcocks, Robert Hall et al
  • STAC 5/E13/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Edon v William Downinge, Edward Browne
  • STAC 5/E14/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Henry Willcock, William Downing, Robert Layton
  • STAC 5/E1/14 - B A Rn Rr - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden v William Downing, Edward Brown, Simon Sippens, Richard Thompson et al
  • STAC 5/E2/5 - A - 33 Eliz - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Robert Burlingham
  • see also STAC Eden

Evans v Newbie

  • Thomas Evans of the parish of Saxtropte [Saxthorpe?] co Norfolk. Two water mills for the grinding of Corn and one other mill for fullinge of Clothe scituate and being within the parish of Horsteed [Horstead] co Norfolk. Forcible entry and ejection. STAC 5/E1/12
  • STAC 5/E1/12 - B - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Evans v Edmund Newbie, Robert Usher, Nicholas Kent, Robert Blenkinsop alias Sextus, John Mower, Clement Warnes, William Tompson [ ] Davison
  • STAC 5/E9/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Evans v Edmond Newby et al
  • see also STAC Evans

Farmor v Haydon

  • Thomas Farmor of East Bashnn’in co Norfolk esquire. STAC 5/F3/27
  • STAC 5/F30/39 - B - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermer v Sir William Heydon
  • STAC 5/F3/27 - B A C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Farmor v Sir William Haydon.
  • see also STAC Farmer

Fawcett v Woolman, Boston and Sharpe

  • James Fawcett of Kings Lynne in the co of Norfolk whereas Robert Page and Elizabeth his wife executrix of Wm Judye deceased . . was possessed of one cupboard and divers other goods . . STAC 5/F22/14
  • STAC 5/F22/14 - B A Rn C - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcett v William Wolman, John Sharpe et al.
  • STAC 5/F4/2 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcet v William Wolman, John Sharp, Thomas Boston, Thomas Miller et al
  • STAC 5/F31/28 - Rr - - Norfolk - James Fawcet v Thomas Boston, William Woolman et al
  • see also STAC Fawcett

Fenn v Flowerdew

  • TNA Note: Burston and Thirning: Estate of Thomas Appleton. STAC 7/12/7
  • STAC 5/F26/21 - B - - Norfolk - William Fenn v Thomas Allenn, Stephen Flowerdue et al
  • STAC 5/F8/12 - Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdine et uxor, John Vinyor Sr et al
  • STAC 5/F6/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenn v Stephen Flowerden et uxor, Thomas Allen et al
  • STAC 5/F13/17 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdew et al
  • STAC 7/12/7 - - - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdewe, et Agnes uxor, John Vinyour et al
  • see also STAC Fenn

Fenton v Wright

  • That whereas one Robert Clarke of Walpole in the co of Norfolk deceased . . . STAC 5/F2/5
  • STAC 5/F10/23 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, William Edes et al
  • STAC 5/F2/5 - B A C - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, Henry Huntson, William Brown, William Eades et al.
  • STAC 5/F16/15 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright, William Welbie et al
  • see also STAC Fenton

Fiske v Goldsmith and Gaunt

  • Ambrose Fyske of Welles in co Norfolk, merchaunte was impleaded by one Edwarde Waytes before the Mayor and recorder of Lynne in the town court there . . . an action upon the case . . Waytes and John Chartres of Lynne merchaunt bought of Fyske one ship called the George for 240li.) STAC 5/F22/19
  • TNA Notes: Lynn: Perjury in a suit concerning a ship. STAC 7/2/29
  • STAC 5/F22/19 - B A - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fiske v Henry Goldsmith, Christopher Gaunte et al
  • STAC 5/F12/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Christopher Grante, Nicholas Derbye et al
  • STAC 7/2/29 - - - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Edward Waytes, Christopher Gaunt
  • see also STAC Fiske

Flatman v Ward and Pigeon

  • TNA Note: Norwich: Verdict of deft's, as a jury. STAC 7/12/9
  • STAC 5/F19/4 - B A - 37 Eliz - - Richard Flatman v William Ward, John Pigeon, Robert Prentice
  • STAC 5/F25/23 - B A C - 38 Eliz - - Richard Flattman v William Ward, Robert Prentice et al
  • STAC 5/F24/7 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Bigeon, Robert Tyte
  • STAC 7/12/9 - - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Pigeon, John Tyte et al
  • STAC 5/F18/22 - I - - - Richard Flatman v Thomas Downing et al
  • STAC 5/F12/32 - A - 38 Eliz - - Richard Flatman et al v Thomas Downing
  • see also STAC Flatman

Flatman v Carter

  • Thomas Flatman of Sterston, Norfolk. STAC 5/F2/20, STAC 5/F2/1
  • STAC 5/F2/20 - B - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Carter, John Rose, Richard Shreve, Henry Horne
  • see also STAC Flatman

Flatman v Flatman

  • Thomas Flatman of Sterston, Norfolk. STAC 5/F2/20, STAC 5/F2/1
  • STAC 5/F2/1 - B Dr - Trin 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Flatman, Robert Prince, Richard Flatman, et al
  • see also STAC Flatman

Forest v Lacy and Booth

  • John Forrest gent. of Holkham Norfolk and Alice his wife, late the widow and administratrix of Edmund Windham esquire. STAC 5/F3/14
  • STAC 5/F3/14 - B A - Trin 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest et uxor v John Lacey, William Booeth, George Booeth et uxor, John Burbitch et al.
  • STAC 5/F19/19 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest v George Boothe, John Burbyche, Henry Call
  • see also STAC Forest

Fulhurste v Vowell

  • George Fulhurste of London gent. Thomas Vowell in [blank] co Norfolk. STAC 5/F3/30
  • STAC 5/F3/30 - B - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - George Fulshurste v Thomas Vowell, Robert Vowell, Richard Fiejohn alias Feejohn, Robert Franklin et al
  • see also STAC Fullhurst

Fuller v Dalton and Elmer

  • Thomas Fuller of Norhold in co Norfolk. Henry Sparrowe and Robart Dalton of the said town yeomen. STAC 5/F3/5
  • STAC 5/F7/33 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - - Thomas Fuller v Richard Elemour, Thomas Neale et al
  • STAC 5/F1/11 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller, Henry Sparrow, Robert Dalton v Richard Elmor, Thomas Neale, Robert Sparrow, Robert Raymond Sr, Robert Raymond Jr
  • STAC 5/F3/5 - B Dr - Hil 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Dalton, Richard Elmer
  • STAC 5/F7/14 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Thomas Fuller v Robert Rayner Sr et al
  • see also STAC Fuller

Gurboldsham v Muskett

  • All Saints Garboldisham, Norfolk. STAC 5/G14/1
  • STAC 5/G14/1 - B - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - The Parishioners of Gurboldsham all Saints, v William Muskett, Simon Muskett.
  • see also STAC Garboldisham

Howard v Mulley

  • TNA Notes: Kenninghall: Resistance to a distress. STAC 7/3/7
  • STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon
  • see also STAC Howard

Hunt v Whiting

  • TNA Note: Gimingham: Forcible entry on lands held of the manor. STAC 7/12/37
  • STAC 5/H60/31 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting, John Browne et al
  • STAC 5/H18/23 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting
  • STAC 5/H28/13 - I D - 10 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Wytty et al
  • STAC 7/12/37 - - - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Windam, Thomas Wyttye, Walter Whiting, Robert Howse et al
  • see also STAC Hunt

Ireland v Wright and Bright

  • The Complainant was in the Fleet prison at the suit of Thomas Tooley on a forged bond. Deposition of Thomas Bleverhassell of the City of Norwich. STAC 5/J3/20
  • STAC 5/J7/28 - B A - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
  • STAC 5/J3/20 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
  • STAC 5/J15/39 - Rn - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Peter Bright, Thomas Wright, Thomas Buxley
  • STAC 5/J20/32 - I D - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Thomas Wright, Peter Bright et al
  • STAC 5/J22/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v John Puxley, Thomas Wright et al
  • see also STAC Ireland

Jennor v Fairfax

  • Francis Jennor is an infant. Margaret Jennor his mother acts for him. STAC 5/J4/13
  • STAC 5/J7/30 - B A Rn - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v Thomas Jennor, John Jennor, William Fayrefax
  • STAC 5/J4/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v William Fairfax et al
  • STAC 5/J14/30 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Jennor, Margery Jennor v William Raynface
  • see also STAC Jenner

Jervis v Tubbard

  • Messuage in Felbrigge Norfolk. STAC 5/J3/16
  • STAC 5/J3/16 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervys, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henbury
  • STAC 5/J7/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - William Jervis, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henburye
  • STAC 5/J13/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - William Jearvens v Christopher Henbery, Edward Tubberd
  • see also STAC Jervais

Johnson v Smyth

  • Thomas Johnson of Old Buckenham and Dorothie his wife. STAC 5/J3/28
  • STAC 5/J3/28 - B - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Johnson v Thomas Smyth, Jacob Preston et Mary uxor, Robert Jolly, Thomas Haplye, John Pryor, Henry Bacon, William Preston, Thomas Mendham, Abraham Preston, Isaac Preston, Richard Lytleproude, Adam Page.
  • see also STAC Johnson

Jubye v Youngman

  • Deposition of Thomas Youngman of Carleton Norfolk and others. STAC 5/J4/5
  • STAC 5/J1/3 - B A - Mich 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jubye v Thomas Youngeman, William Jubye, John Sherwyn, William Yongeman
  • STAC 5/J4/5 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jewbye v William Yongeman, William Jewbye
  • STAC 5/J15/33 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jewbie v Thomas Youngman, William Youngman, William Jewbie
  • see also STAC Jubey

Killingtree v Pell

  • Wm Killingtree mayor of your highness town of Kings Lynne in the county of Norfolk. STAC 5/K1/3
  • STAC 5/K1/3 - B A Rn - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Killingtree, Robert Jervis, John Grigby, George Baker, Francis Shaxton, Thomas Overend v John Pell, Geofery Pell, Valentine Pell, Thomas Blesbie, Henry Violet, William Woolman, Richard Walters, Thomas Maye, Christopher Fisher, Robert Hulliard, Thomas Fowell, Thomas Haughton
  • STAC 5/K8/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - The Mayor of Kings Lynn v John Pell Jeffrey Pell, Christopher Fisher et al
  • see also STAC Killingtree

Knyvett v Dixon

  • Depositions taken in Norwich. STAC 5/K4/34
  • STAC 5/K8/32 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Thomas Knyvett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
  • STAC 5/K5/30 - I D - 24 Eliz - Thomas Knivett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
  • STAC 5/K4/34 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Richard Ringwood, Ralph Dixon et al
  • see also STAC Knivett

Knyvett v Burgess and Ryder

  • Sir Thomas Knivett of Asshwelthorpe Hall Norfolk. STAC 5/K2/8
  • STAC 5/K2/8 - B A I D - Easter 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knivett v John Botye, John Burge Jr, William Rider, Robert Keene, George Browne
  • STAC 5/K3/5 - I D - 32 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v Thomas Burgess, John Burgess et al
  • STAC 5/K7/12 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burghe, William Rider et al
  • STAC 5/K14/32 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burgess, William Ryder et al
  • STAC 5/K6/34 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knevett v John Booties Sr, William Ryder
  • see also STAC Knivett

L

Marsham v Brampton

  • STAC 5/M13/13 - B A - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - The inhabitants of the town of Marsham v James Brampton, William Gedney et al
  • see also STAC Marsham

N

O

Parfrey v Stokes

  • TNA Note: Wimbotsham: Tithe corn. STAC 7/14/18
  • STAC 5/P46/39 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes et al
  • STAC 5/P53/17 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes
  • STAC 5/P13/26 - B A - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfraye v Thomas Stokes et al
  • STAC 5/P37/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes, Christopher Stokes
  • STAC 7/14/18 - - - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes et al
  • see also STAC Purefey

Q

Reade v Grren and Britton

  • TNA Note: Forgery of a writ removing a suit to Westminster from the manorial court of Gimingham. STAC 7/5/4
  • STAC 5/R35/17 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Humfry Britton
  • STAC 7/5/4 - - - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Thomas Grene, Humphrey Bretten
  • see also STAC Read

Sporeley v Makender

  • TNA Note: Wolverton and Lynn: Forcible dispute as to gathering mussels, and false imprisonment. STAC 7/5/15
  • STAC 5/W16/28 - I D - 1 Eliz - Inhabitants of Woolverton v Inhabitants of Lynn
  • STAC 7/5/15 - - - Lincolnshire - Roger Sporeley, Alexander Tebye, John Geyges et al inhabitants of Wolverton v John Makender, Ralph Downes, Edward Andrye, Thomas Ladyman et al
  • see also STAC Wolverton and see also STAC Sporeley

Taverner v Thompson

  • STAC 7/15/44 - TNA Note: Perjury in the Exchequer on behalf of Lord Cromwell, in a suit for the manors of North Elmham and Beetley. Roger Taverner, deputy surveyor of the Queen's woods
  • STAC 5/T35/30 - B A - 16 Eliz - Roger Taverner v Thomas Lusher, Margaret Thompson et al
  • STAC 7/15/44 - - - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Margery Tompson et al
  • see also STAC Taverner

Thetford Corporation v Bassingwaite

  • STAC 5/T37/37 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Mayor and Burgesses of Thetford v John Bassingwayte, Antony Freere et al
  • see also STAC Thetford

Tymperley v Themilthorpe

  • TNA Note: Will of Bartram Themilthorpe of Worstead. STAC 7/7/30
  • STAC 5/T17/29 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Henry Tympley v Thomas Thinilthorpe
  • STAC 7/7/30 - - - Norfolk - Henry Tymperley, v Thomas Themilthorpe, John Potter
  • see also STAC Timperley

Trindle v Woodhouse

  • TNA Note: Carlton etc: Tenancy in first deft's manor. STAC 7/15/50
  • STAC 5/T34/31 - B - 22 Eliz - Agnes Trundell, Thomas Trundell v Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
  • STAC 5/T26/5 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Agnes Tryndle, Thomas Tryndle v Sir Roger Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/T18/27 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Agnes Tryndell, Thomas Tryndell v Sir Roger Woodehouse, Henry Blake
  • STAC 5/T13/40 - I D - 23 Eliz - Thomas Tryndell et uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
  • STAC 7/15/50 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Trundell, et Agnes uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
  • see also STAC Trindle

UV

Whitney v Gest

  • Thetford, Norfolk. Robert Whitney, Gent. Interrogatories of John Gest of Thetford, Norfolk and William Tompson of Thetford, shoemaker. STAC 5/W56/39
  • STAC 5/W32/20 - B - - Robert Whitney v John Geste, William Tompson et al
  • STAC 5/W56/39 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v Lawrence Fytt, William Thompson
  • STAC 5/W29/1 - A Rn C I D - 29 Eliz - Robert Whitney v William Thompson, Lawrence Fytt et al
  • see also STAC Whitney

Woodhouse v Kett

  • TNA Note: Mileham and Beeston: Maintenance of a drain and bridge on the manor, common of pasture. STAC 7/16/22
  • STAC 5/W22/13 - B A - 17 Eliz - Roger Woodhowse v Valentine Kett
  • STAC 7/16/22 - - - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Richard Kett, Hilary Baly et al
  • STAC 5/W3/16 - B A Rn C I D - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Knyght, Valentine Knyght alias Kett, John Nevell, William Chace, Nicholas Banister et al
  • STAC 5/W16/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Valentine Kett
  • STAC 5/W18/14 - Rn - 23 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Botie, John Nevell et al
  • STAC 5/W4/26 - B A Rr - Trin 23 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Henry Knevett, Edmund Knevett, Anthony Knevett, John Neville, Richard Watts, William Guilder et al
  • see also STAC Woodhouse

X

Yarmouth Corporation v Bettys

  • STAC 5/Y2/4 - B - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Jurats and Burgesses of Yarmouth v Thomas Bettys, John Pidgeon et al
  • see also STAC Yarmouth

Yarmouth Corporation v Gunvile

  • STAC 5/B103/16 - B A Rn - 12 Eliz - John Burforth, Ambrose Bullard v Henry Gunoyle et al
  • STAC 5/Y2/11 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvile et al
  • STAC 5/Y4/2 - Rn - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvyle
  • STAC 5/U3/2 - C I D - 13 Eliz - John Uffar, Ambrose Bullward v Henry Gunvyle, Robert Candler et al
  • see also STAC Yarmouth

Yarmouth Corporation v Wylde

  • STAC 5/Y1/14 - B Dr - Hil 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Comomalty of Yarmouth, v William Wylde, John Wylde, Nathaniell Arnold, Matthew Fullgood, Robert Ward et al
  • see also STAC Yarmouth

Z

Almoner

Almoner v Blundeville

  • Andrew Green late of Catfeild Norfolk. Hanged himself. felo de se. STAC 5/A2/32
  • STAC 5/A2/32 - B A - Hil 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v John Blundeville et uxor
  • see also STAC Blundeville

‘’' Almoner v Goldman

  • One Steven Meade late of Rewton or Beston neare unto the sea side in Norfolk. felo de se. STAC 5/A3/36
  • STAC 5/A3/36 - B A - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v Robert Goldman
  • see also STAC Goldman

Almoner v Hall

  • Henry Shrympling and Adame Elger late of Tyrinton St Jones [Terrington St Johns] in Norfolk. both felo de se. STAC 5/A3/34
  • STAC 5/A3/34 - B - - Norfolk - Almoner v William Hall, Francis Leggate
  • see also STAC Hall

Almoner v Lowcock

  • STAC 5/A6/8 - B - 39 Eliz - Derbyshire, Norfolk - Almoner v William Lowecock
  • Edmond Stephenson late of Dronfield co Derby gent felo de se. Drowned himself in Norfolk in a river near Norwich. STAC 5/A6/8
  • see also STAC Lowcock

Almoner v Moore

  • STAC 7/1/10 - TNA Note: Hingham: Goods of [blank] Forde, suicide
  • STAC 7/1/10 - - - Norfolk - Almoner (Edmund, bishop of Rochester) v Thomas Moore
  • see also STAC Moore

Almoner v Perryman

  • Walter Vyncent late of Esson [? Easton] in Norfolk felo de se. STAC 5/A5/18
  • STAC 5/A5/18 - B A - - Norfolk - Almoner v Hugh Perryman
  • see also STAC Perryman

Almoner v Pleasants

  • Bond by Richard Banges of Norwich to John Mingey of Norwich apothecary. STAC 5/A39/8
  • Richard Banges of the City of Norwich tanner drowned himself, felo de se. STAC 5/A4/33
  • STAC 5/A4/33 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Pleasants, William Harebrowne, John Mingey, John Howes
  • STAC 5/A39/8 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Plesaunce
  • see also STAC Pleasants

Attorney General

AG v Abrahan

  • STAC 5/A39/24 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Robert Abrahan
  • see also STAC Abrahan

AG v Fryer

  • STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
  • STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - AG v Anthony Fryer
  • STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford
  • STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - - AG v Anthony Frise
  • see also STAC Fryer

AG v Gresham and Clere

  • Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich). STAC 5/A32/39
  • Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.
  • STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Cleare
  • STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
    • Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General
    • Answer of Edward Clere.
    • Answer of Thomas Sego
    • Demurrer of William Gressham
  • STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al
  • see also STAC Clere

AG v Gibson

  • Norwich, Eight Answers. STAC 5/A32/30
  • STAC 5/A32/30 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gibson et uxor, Judeth Wilson, John Thompson, John Beamond, Simon Davye et al
  • STAC 5/A26/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - AG v Margaret Gybson et al
  • STAC 5/A19/32 - I - - AG v Henry Gybson
  • see also STAC Gibson

AG v Harward

AG v Heveningham

  • Interrogatories to be ministered to Sir Arthur Heveningham knight on the part and behalf of HM. Imp did not the Lords of HM most hon PC about the one and thirty yeare of HM raygne direct ther letters to you Sir Arthur Heveningham, Sir Edward Cleer, Sir Robert Southwell knights, Thomas Farmore, William Rugge and Charles Cornwales esquires to examine and ende a cause betwene Thomas Thwayte of Hardingham in Norfolk esq & Richard Thwaites one of the younger sons of the said Thomas of the one parte and Antony Thwayte eldest son of the said Thomas & Francis the wife of the said Anthony on the other parte according to equitie etc. STAC 5/A6/25
  • STAC 5/A6/25 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Sir Arthur Hevenham
  • see also STAC Heveningham

AG v Jermyn

  • STAC 5/A2/40 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmond Jermyn, Robert Bateman, Rowland Thompson, Thomas Worth et al
  • STAC 5/A57/31 - B A - - AG v Francis Jermyne, Richard Jones et al
  • STAC 5/A15/8 - I D - 8 Eliz - AG v Francis Jermye et al
  • STAC 5/A11/16 - A - 40 Eliz - AG v Edmund Jermyn et al
  • see also STAC Jermyn

AG v Pigeon

  • Wymondham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A55/37
  • STAC 5/A55/37 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon et al
  • STAC 5/A17/8 - Rn - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
  • STAC 5/A22/29 - Rr - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
  • STAC 5/A28/16 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, Richard Witherley, John Parker et al
  • see also STAC Pigeon

AG v Terrold

  • STAC 5/A1/39 - A Rn C I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaits, Thomas Amides, William Terold
  • STAC 5/A46/5 - C I D - 40 Eliz- AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaytes, Thomas Amyas et al
  • STAC 7/17/55 - - - AG v William Terolde et al
  • see also STAC Terrold

AG v Thwaites

  • STAC 5/A6/27 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Bridget Thwaits, Thomas Cooper, Robert Cooper
  • Examinations taken at Hardingham co Norfolk 25 Sept 40 Eliz before Danyell Rieve DD, Martyn Sidley esq, Thomas Thetford esq [in the case] between William Terrold, Richard Thwaite et al Defs and Edward Cooke AG compl. Interrogatories to be ministered to Bridgett Thwaites widdowe Thomas Cooper yeoman, Robert Cooper yeoman on the part of William Terrold, Richard Thwaites and Thomas Amyas, three of the defs to the information of Edward Cooke AG. Depostion of Thomas Cowper of Depeham co Norfolk aged 60: that he hath heard that there were letters directed to certain knights and esquires in the said county from the lords of HM PC authorizing thaen therby to here and determine all matters of controversy that were then betwene Thomas Thwaites of Hardingham and Anthony his eldest sonne. STAC 5/A6/27
  • see also STAC Thwaits

AG v Wharton

  • Ingrossing of grain, many many answers including one by Robert Pooke citizen and aldermen of Norwich. STAC 5/A55/36
  • STAC 5/A8/22 - I - 39 Eliz - AG v Martin Wharton, Thomas Norfor et al
  • STAC 5/A55/36 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martyn Wharton et al
  • see also STAC Wharton

AG v Whitehand

  • TNA Note: Forgery of warrants and bonds. STAC 7/1/5
  • STAC 5/A47/36 - I D - 44 Eliz - AG v Ralfe Whithand
  • STAC 5/A44/14 - I D - 45 Eliz - AG v Raphe Whitehand, John Clybury
  • STAC 7/1/5 - - - Norfolk - AG (Edward Coke) v Ralph Whitehand, Edward Ralf
  • see also STAC Whitehand