Difference between revisions of "STAC Newman"

From Waalt
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 +
''' Newman, Joachim '''
 +
*STAC 5/N15/26 - B A - 31 Eliz - Joakim Newman alias Newton v Peter Tompson, Ralph Holte
 +
*STAC 5/N13/16 - I D - 31 Eliz - Jacquin Newton v Ralph Holte
 +
*STAC 5/N17/28 - I D - 22 Eliz - Joachim Newton v Edmond Trafford
 +
*STAC 5/N10/7 - I D - 33 Eliz - Joachim Newton v Pawley Rysley et al
 +
 +
''' Newman, John'''
 +
*STAC 5/N1/9 - B A Rn - 18 Eliz - Dorset - John Norman v James Lavender, Edward Cole, John Lavender, John Cole, Roger Young et al
 +
*STAC 5/N9/16 - I D - 19 Eliz - Dorset - John Newman v James Lavender, Edward Cole, John Collier et al
 +
*STAC 5/N13/32 - C I D - 22 Eliz - Dorset - John Newman v James Lavender et al
 +
**see [[STAC co Dorset]]
 +
 +
''' Newman, John'''
 +
*STAC 5/N5/3 - b a Rn c i d - 31 Eliz - John Newman v Robert Strowde, Robert Thorne et al
 +
*STAC 5/N8/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - John Newman v Hugh Chycke et al
 +
 +
''' Newman, Nicholas'''
 +
*STAC 5/N3/2 - I D - 23 Eliz - Devon - Nicholas Newman, Richard Hacknell v Robert Smith, Richard Drewe
 +
**see [[STAC co Devon]]
 +
 +
''' Newman, Robert'''
 +
*STAC 5/N16/26 - A - 37 Eliz - Kent - Robert Newman v Thomas Herinden, John Buckland
 +
*STAC 5/N12/16 - B A - 37 Eliz - Kent - Robert Newman v Thomas Heranden, John Buckland
 +
*STAC 5/N8/11 - I D - 37 Eliz - Kent - Robert Newman v John Buckland, Thomas Herenden
 +
**see [[STAC co Kent]]
 +
 +
''' Newman, Thomas'''
 +
*STAC 5/N6/5 - B - 9 Eliz - Thomas Newman v Edward Holt, John Rastell et al
 +
 +
''' Newman, Thomas'''
 +
*STAC 5/N10/30 - B A - 34 Eliz - Thomas Newman v Robert Betts, Anthony Fisher et al
 +
*STAC 5/N13/36 - D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Newman v Antony Fisher
 +
*STAC 5/N12/31 - I - 34 Eliz - Thomas Newman v Robert Betts, Antony Fysher
 +
 +
''' Newman, Thomas'''
 +
*STAC 5/N3/28 - B Dr - 35 Eliz - Essex - Thomas Newman v Thomas Dayne
 +
*STAC 5/N13/23 - I D - 35 Eliz - Essex - Thomas Newman v Thomas Dane
 +
**see [[STAC co Essex]]
 +
 
''' Almoner '''
 
''' Almoner '''
−
*STAC 5/A39/27 - B A - 30 Eliz - Almoner v William Newman, William Sibley, Robert Smith (John Sibley late of Shoppesley in the co of Bedd hanged himself)
+
*STAC 7/17/14 - - - Bedfordshire - Almoner v Thomas Newman
 +
*STAC 5/A39/27 - B A - 30 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Almoner v William Newman, William Sibley, Robert Smith  
 +
**see [[STAC co Bedford]]
  
−
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 +
*STAC 5/N10/7 - Newman, Joachim - Interrs refer to the escape of Edmonde Trafford from the Fleet prison. Interr t.b.m. to Pawle Risley (no deposition included) " .. was not the said Edmonde Trafford at your father's home ..". Deposition of Willm Bullock of Chyttwood, Bucks.(dk)
 +
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 39r. Mary Newman, widow, et al, plaintiffs; John Sheriff et al. See this order for the general charge of the bill which was grounded upon the general terms contrary to Her Majesty’s laws and statutes. The [consideration?] of the form of this bill was referred to the Lord Chief Justice who in open court upon consideration had and conference with other the judges did certify that a bill so laid the court may well proceed in censure in any matter contained in any such bill not being within the compass of any statute and ought not to be restrained to the very statute itself by the general word ‘statute’ contained in the said bill. Trinity 30 Elizabeth (kk)

Revision as of 09:15, 29 May 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Newman, Joachim

  • STAC 5/N15/26 - B A - 31 Eliz - Joakim Newman alias Newton v Peter Tompson, Ralph Holte
  • STAC 5/N13/16 - I D - 31 Eliz - Jacquin Newton v Ralph Holte
  • STAC 5/N17/28 - I D - 22 Eliz - Joachim Newton v Edmond Trafford
  • STAC 5/N10/7 - I D - 33 Eliz - Joachim Newton v Pawley Rysley et al

Newman, John

  • STAC 5/N1/9 - B A Rn - 18 Eliz - Dorset - John Norman v James Lavender, Edward Cole, John Lavender, John Cole, Roger Young et al
  • STAC 5/N9/16 - I D - 19 Eliz - Dorset - John Newman v James Lavender, Edward Cole, John Collier et al
  • STAC 5/N13/32 - C I D - 22 Eliz - Dorset - John Newman v James Lavender et al

Newman, John

  • STAC 5/N5/3 - b a Rn c i d - 31 Eliz - John Newman v Robert Strowde, Robert Thorne et al
  • STAC 5/N8/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - John Newman v Hugh Chycke et al

Newman, Nicholas

  • STAC 5/N3/2 - I D - 23 Eliz - Devon - Nicholas Newman, Richard Hacknell v Robert Smith, Richard Drewe

Newman, Robert

  • STAC 5/N16/26 - A - 37 Eliz - Kent - Robert Newman v Thomas Herinden, John Buckland
  • STAC 5/N12/16 - B A - 37 Eliz - Kent - Robert Newman v Thomas Heranden, John Buckland
  • STAC 5/N8/11 - I D - 37 Eliz - Kent - Robert Newman v John Buckland, Thomas Herenden

Newman, Thomas

  • STAC 5/N6/5 - B - 9 Eliz - Thomas Newman v Edward Holt, John Rastell et al

Newman, Thomas

  • STAC 5/N10/30 - B A - 34 Eliz - Thomas Newman v Robert Betts, Anthony Fisher et al
  • STAC 5/N13/36 - D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Newman v Antony Fisher
  • STAC 5/N12/31 - I - 34 Eliz - Thomas Newman v Robert Betts, Antony Fysher

Newman, Thomas

  • STAC 5/N3/28 - B Dr - 35 Eliz - Essex - Thomas Newman v Thomas Dayne
  • STAC 5/N13/23 - I D - 35 Eliz - Essex - Thomas Newman v Thomas Dane

Almoner

  • STAC 7/17/14 - - - Bedfordshire - Almoner v Thomas Newman
  • STAC 5/A39/27 - B A - 30 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Almoner v William Newman, William Sibley, Robert Smith

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/N10/7 - Newman, Joachim - Interrs refer to the escape of Edmonde Trafford from the Fleet prison. Interr t.b.m. to Pawle Risley (no deposition included) " .. was not the said Edmonde Trafford at your father's home ..". Deposition of Willm Bullock of Chyttwood, Bucks.(dk)
  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 39r. Mary Newman, widow, et al, plaintiffs; John Sheriff et al. See this order for the general charge of the bill which was grounded upon the general terms contrary to Her Majesty’s laws and statutes. The [consideration?] of the form of this bill was referred to the Lord Chief Justice who in open court upon consideration had and conference with other the judges did certify that a bill so laid the court may well proceed in censure in any matter contained in any such bill not being within the compass of any statute and ought not to be restrained to the very statute itself by the general word ‘statute’ contained in the said bill. Trinity 30 Elizabeth (kk)
Retrieved from "https://waalt.uh.edu/index.php?title=STAC_Newman&oldid=82480"