Difference between revisions of "STAC Hulmes"

From Waalt
(5/H35/28)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Hulmes, Edward '''
 
''' Hulmes, Edward '''
*STAC 5/H26/16 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Richard Reynolds, Robert Starre et al
+
*STAC 5/H26/16 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Richard Reynolds, Robert Starre et al  
 
*STAC 5/H77/32 - B A - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Richard Reignolds, John Templer et al
 
*STAC 5/H77/32 - B A - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Richard Reignolds, John Templer et al
 +
*STAC 5/H10/1 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes v Richard Reynolds et al
 
*STAC 5/H15/28 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes v Robert Starre, Simon Greene et al
 
*STAC 5/H15/28 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes v Robert Starre, Simon Greene et al
*STAC 5/H10/1 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes v Richard Reynolds et al
 
 
*STAC 5/H10/14 - I - 21 Eliz - Edward Houlmes, William Paxford v Robert Starre, Richard Reynolds
 
*STAC 5/H10/14 - I - 21 Eliz - Edward Houlmes, William Paxford v Robert Starre, Richard Reynolds
 
*STAC 5/H10/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Thomas Templer alias Byrt, Thomas Hughs alias Colcot et al
 
*STAC 5/H10/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Thomas Templer alias Byrt, Thomas Hughs alias Colcot et al
Line 9: Line 13:
  
 
''' Hulme, Katherine '''
 
''' Hulme, Katherine '''
*STAC 5/H35/28 - B - 42 Eliz - Katheren Hulme v Philip Trafford, John Hulme, Thomas Presson et al
+
*STAC 5/H35/28 - B - 42 Eliz - Cheshire - Katheren Hulme v Philip Trafford, John Hulme, Thomas Presson et al
 +
**see [[STAC co Chester]]
  
 
''' Hulme, Richard '''
 
''' Hulme, Richard '''
Line 20: Line 25:
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
*STAC 5/H35/28 - Katherine Hulme of Hillylees in Heaton, Cheshire. Assault & wounding of the complts sons.(dk)
 

Revision as of 12:52, 18 May 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Hulmes, Edward

  • STAC 5/H26/16 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Richard Reynolds, Robert Starre et al
  • STAC 5/H77/32 - B A - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Richard Reignolds, John Templer et al
  • STAC 5/H10/1 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes v Richard Reynolds et al
  • STAC 5/H15/28 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes v Robert Starre, Simon Greene et al
  • STAC 5/H10/14 - I - 21 Eliz - Edward Houlmes, William Paxford v Robert Starre, Richard Reynolds
  • STAC 5/H10/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edward Hulmes, William Paxford v Thomas Templer alias Byrt, Thomas Hughs alias Colcot et al
  • STAC 7/23/48 - - - Edward Hulmes et al v William Paxford et al

Hulme, Katherine

  • STAC 5/H35/28 - B - 42 Eliz - Cheshire - Katheren Hulme v Philip Trafford, John Hulme, Thomas Presson et al

Hulme, Richard

  • STAC 5/H65/14 - B A - 30 Eliz - Richard Hulme v Roger Watt, John Drinkwater et al
  • STAC 7/23/47 - - - Richard Hulme v Roger Watt et al

Hulme, Thomas

  • STAC 5/H44/4 - B A Rn C - 44 Eliz - Thomas Hulme v Helen Wrighte, Thomas Wrighte, William Barbor et al
  • STAC 5/H45/37 - I D - 44 Eliz - Thomas Hulme v William Barber, William Wright

Notes, Additions and Corrections