Difference between revisions of "STAC Howard"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | |||
''' Howrde, George ''' | ''' Howrde, George ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/H32/37 - B A Rn C I D - 22 Eliz - George Howrde v Rowland Ludlow, Charles Hibbins, John Broom et al | + | *STAC 5/H32/37 - B A Rn C I D - 22 Eliz - George Howrde v Rowland Ludlow, Charles Hibbins, John Broom et al |
''' Howard, Charles ''' | ''' Howard, Charles ''' | ||
Line 12: | Line 15: | ||
''' Howard, Thomas ''' | ''' Howard, Thomas ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H8/4 - B Dr A Rn Rr - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v John Sherers, Thomas Pynnell, William Beale Sr, John Skull et al | ||
*STAC 5/H46/32 - I D - 26 Eliz - Thomas Howard v Thomas Pynnel, John Sherer | *STAC 5/H46/32 - I D - 26 Eliz - Thomas Howard v Thomas Pynnel, John Sherer | ||
*STAC 5/H41/6 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer et al | *STAC 5/H41/6 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer et al | ||
Line 18: | Line 22: | ||
*STAC 5/H33/23 - Dr A C - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howarde v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer, Richard Yonge et al | *STAC 5/H33/23 - Dr A C - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howarde v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer, Richard Yonge et al | ||
*STAC 5/H6/1 - B I D - Mich 26/27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Edward Osborne, John Spencer, William Massame, Richard Branden et al | *STAC 5/H6/1 - B I D - Mich 26/27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Edward Osborne, John Spencer, William Massame, Richard Branden et al | ||
− | |||
*STAC 5/H30/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al | *STAC 5/H30/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al | ||
*STAC 5/H37/22 - I D - 35 Eliz - Sir Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al | *STAC 5/H37/22 - I D - 35 Eliz - Sir Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al | ||
Line 32: | Line 35: | ||
*STAC 5/H6/25 - B A C I D - Hil 24 Eliz - William Lord Haward v William Acheham, John Morrys, Richard Morrys, John Roper alias Tucker | *STAC 5/H6/25 - B A C I D - Hil 24 Eliz - William Lord Haward v William Acheham, John Morrys, Richard Morrys, John Roper alias Tucker | ||
*STAC 5/H44/25 - B A Rr C - 31 Eliz - William Lord Howard v Sir Robert Dennis | *STAC 5/H44/25 - B A Rr C - 31 Eliz - William Lord Howard v Sir Robert Dennis | ||
− | *STAC 5/H53/28 - I D - 33 Eliz - Lord William Howard v Thomas Blyth | + | *STAC 5/H53/28 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - Lord William Howard v Thomas Blyth |
*STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon | *STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Bevan Case Index ''' | ||
+ | *Howard v Acham - STAC 5/H6/25, STAC 5/H13/24, STAC 5/H31/3, STAC 5/H34/27 | ||
+ | *Howard v Beale - STAC 5/H30/34, STAC 5/H37/22 | ||
+ | *Howard v Bell - STAC 5/H5/5, STAC 5/H68/37 | ||
+ | *Howard v Blyth - STAC 5/H53/28 | ||
+ | *Howard v Dennis - STAC 5/H44/25 | ||
+ | *Howard v Gorges - STAC 5/H20/3, STAC 5/H29/11 | ||
+ | *Howard v Ludlow - STAC 5/H50/21, STAC 5/H12/1, STAC 5/H72/25, STAC 5/H32/37 | ||
+ | *Howard v Mulley - STAC 7/3/7 | ||
+ | *Howard v Osborne - STAC 5/H6/1, STAC 5/H10/21, STAC 5/H33/23, STAC 5/H38/10, STAC 5/H41/6 | ||
+ | *Howard v Pinnell - STAC 5/H8/4, STAC 5/H46/32 | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
*STAC 7/3/7 - TNA Notes: Kenninghall: Resistance to a distress | *STAC 7/3/7 - TNA Notes: Kenninghall: Resistance to a distress | ||
− | * | + | *STAC 5/H53/28 - Interrogatories to be ministered to Thomas Blyth one of the defts to the complt of William, Lord Howard, include: Were you present when William, Lord Dacre made livery of seisin to Leonard Dacre his son at the castle at Graistocke [Cumberland] & was Willm Middleton present there. From what place did Lord Dacre & Leonard Dacre come that day, who was with them, and where did they each go afterwards. Deponent 27 Apr Anno 33 Eliz: Thomas Blith of Brough Westmorland yeoman |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 18:58, 31 December 2018
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Howrde, George
- STAC 5/H32/37 - B A Rn C I D - 22 Eliz - George Howrde v Rowland Ludlow, Charles Hibbins, John Broom et al
Howard, Charles
- STAC 5/H72/25 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard v Owen Bacon
- STAC 5/H50/21 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard alias Highte v Edmund Sudlow, Owen Bacon et al
- STAC 5/H12/1 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard v John Helliar et al
Howard, Henry (Viscount)
- STAC 5/H20/3 - B A - 26 Eliz - Henry Viscount Howard v Arthur Gorges, Thomas Turbeville et al
- STAC 5/H29/11 - I D - 27 Eliz - Henry Viscount Haward v Thomas Turburvile
Howard, Thomas
- STAC 5/H8/4 - B Dr A Rn Rr - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v John Sherers, Thomas Pynnell, William Beale Sr, John Skull et al
- STAC 5/H46/32 - I D - 26 Eliz - Thomas Howard v Thomas Pynnel, John Sherer
- STAC 5/H41/6 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer et al
- STAC 5/H38/10 - I D - 28 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer et al
- STAC 5/H10/21 - I D - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howarde v Sir Edward Osborne, William Masham, John Spencer
- STAC 5/H33/23 - Dr A C - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howarde v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer, Richard Yonge et al
- STAC 5/H6/1 - B I D - Mich 26/27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Edward Osborne, John Spencer, William Massame, Richard Branden et al
- STAC 5/H30/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al
- STAC 5/H37/22 - I D - 35 Eliz - Sir Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al
Howard, William and Elizabeth
- STAC 5/H5/5 - B A - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Lord William Howard, Elizabeth Howard v George Bell, John Bell, William Milneburne, Thomas Bell et al
- STAC 5/H68/37 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lady Elizabeth Howard, Lord William Howard v George Bell
Howard, William
- STAC 5/H31/3 - I D - 25 Eliz - Lord William Howarde v Richard Morrys
- STAC 5/H34/27 - I D - 26 Eliz - William Lord Howard v William Archam et al
- STAC 5/H13/24 - C I D - 26 Eliz - William Lord Howarde v William Acham, John Roper et al
- STAC 5/H6/25 - B A C I D - Hil 24 Eliz - William Lord Haward v William Acheham, John Morrys, Richard Morrys, John Roper alias Tucker
- STAC 5/H44/25 - B A Rr C - 31 Eliz - William Lord Howard v Sir Robert Dennis
- STAC 5/H53/28 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - Lord William Howard v Thomas Blyth
- STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon
Bevan Case Index
- Howard v Acham - STAC 5/H6/25, STAC 5/H13/24, STAC 5/H31/3, STAC 5/H34/27
- Howard v Beale - STAC 5/H30/34, STAC 5/H37/22
- Howard v Bell - STAC 5/H5/5, STAC 5/H68/37
- Howard v Blyth - STAC 5/H53/28
- Howard v Dennis - STAC 5/H44/25
- Howard v Gorges - STAC 5/H20/3, STAC 5/H29/11
- Howard v Ludlow - STAC 5/H50/21, STAC 5/H12/1, STAC 5/H72/25, STAC 5/H32/37
- Howard v Mulley - STAC 7/3/7
- Howard v Osborne - STAC 5/H6/1, STAC 5/H10/21, STAC 5/H33/23, STAC 5/H38/10, STAC 5/H41/6
- Howard v Pinnell - STAC 5/H8/4, STAC 5/H46/32
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 7/3/7 - TNA Notes: Kenninghall: Resistance to a distress
- STAC 5/H53/28 - Interrogatories to be ministered to Thomas Blyth one of the defts to the complt of William, Lord Howard, include: Were you present when William, Lord Dacre made livery of seisin to Leonard Dacre his son at the castle at Graistocke [Cumberland] & was Willm Middleton present there. From what place did Lord Dacre & Leonard Dacre come that day, who was with them, and where did they each go afterwards. Deponent 27 Apr Anno 33 Eliz: Thomas Blith of Brough Westmorland yeoman