Difference between revisions of "STAC Flower"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
''' Flower, Ambrose ''' | ''' Flower, Ambrose ''' | ||
Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
*STAC 5/F28/17 - B - 28 Eliz - Francis Flower, Christopher Barker et al v Roger Ward, Richard Mantell | *STAC 5/F28/17 - B - 28 Eliz - Francis Flower, Christopher Barker et al v Roger Ward, Richard Mantell | ||
*STAC 5/F5/1 - I D - 27 Eliz - Francis Flower, Christopher Barker et al v Robert Robinson et al | *STAC 5/F5/1 - I D - 27 Eliz - Francis Flower, Christopher Barker et al v Robert Robinson et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/F2/17 - B A I D - Mich 27/28 Eliz - Francis Flower, Christopher Barker, John Wyght, William Norton, John Harrison, Garret Dewes, Richard Watkins v Thomas Dunn, Robert Robinson. | ||
*STAC 5/F17/4 - Moved to [[STAC Fowler]] | *STAC 5/F17/4 - Moved to [[STAC Fowler]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Flower, Francis ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F7/7 - B A - 26 Eliz - Francis Flower v Edward Smith, Robert Bourne, Henry Jefferson | *STAC 5/F7/7 - B A - 26 Eliz - Francis Flower v Edward Smith, Robert Bourne, Henry Jefferson | ||
− | |||
''' Flower, John ''' | ''' Flower, John ''' | ||
Line 17: | Line 20: | ||
*STAC 5/F25/38 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Flower v George Mackworth, Thomas Baylie et al | *STAC 5/F25/38 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Flower v George Mackworth, Thomas Baylie et al | ||
*STAC 5/F15/33 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Flower v George Mackwerth | *STAC 5/F15/33 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Flower v George Mackwerth | ||
+ | **see also [[STAC Fowler]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Flower, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F31/12 - Rn - 19 Eliz - John Flower v Francis Parker, Thomas Stephens et al | *STAC 5/F31/12 - Rn - 19 Eliz - John Flower v Francis Parker, Thomas Stephens et al | ||
− | *STAC 5/F19/7 - B A Rn Rr - 20 Eliz - | + | |
+ | ''' Flower, John ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/F19/7 - B A Rn Rr - 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Flower v John Hardikyn, John Elwell | ||
*STAC 5/F12/4 - I D - 22 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Flower v John Hardkyn, John Ilwell | *STAC 5/F12/4 - I D - 22 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Flower v John Hardkyn, John Ilwell | ||
*STAC 5/F16/37 - I D - 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Flower v John Ellwell | *STAC 5/F16/37 - I D - 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Flower v John Ellwell | ||
− | *STAC 5/F11/23 - B A - 20 Eliz - | + | **see [[STAC co Wiltshire]] |
+ | |||
+ | ''' Flower, John ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/F11/23 - B A - 20 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Jasper Coales et al. | ||
*STAC 5/F4/37 - I D - 21 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v Jasper Coles, John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al | *STAC 5/F4/37 - I D - 21 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v Jasper Coles, John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al | ||
*STAC 5/F31/35 - Rn - - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al | *STAC 5/F31/35 - Rn - - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co Rutland]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Flower, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F25/1 - B Dr - 20 Eliz - John Flower v Edward Norwich, John Dickenson et al | *STAC 5/F25/1 - B Dr - 20 Eliz - John Flower v Edward Norwich, John Dickenson et al | ||
*STAC 5/F20/2 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Flower v Richard Fowler, Thomas Thorpe et al | *STAC 5/F20/2 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Flower v Richard Fowler, Thomas Thorpe et al | ||
*STAC 5/F30/38 - Rn - - John Flower v Richard Fowler | *STAC 5/F30/38 - Rn - - John Flower v Richard Fowler | ||
*STAC 5/F14/13 - B A C I D - 26 Eliz - John Flowre v John Browne et al | *STAC 5/F14/13 - B A C I D - 26 Eliz - John Flowre v John Browne et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Flower, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F17/14 - B A - 28 Eliz - John Flower v Bennet Anton | *STAC 5/F17/14 - B A - 28 Eliz - John Flower v Bennet Anton | ||
*STAC 5/F22/40 - I D - 28 Eliz - John Flower v Bennet Anten et al | *STAC 5/F22/40 - I D - 28 Eliz - John Flower v Bennet Anten et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Flower, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F24/38 - B - - John Flower v John Cottington | *STAC 5/F24/38 - B - - John Flower v John Cottington | ||
*STAC 5/F23/1 - I D - 28 Eliz - John Flower v John Cottyngton | *STAC 5/F23/1 - I D - 28 Eliz - John Flower v John Cottyngton | ||
*STAC 5/F14/30 - A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - John Flower v John Collington | *STAC 5/F14/30 - A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - John Flower v John Collington | ||
− | *STAC 5/F11/32 - B A - 29 Eliz - | + | |
+ | ''' Flower, John ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/F6/29 - A - 30 Eliz - John Flower v Thomas Lister, John Midleton et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/F17/38 - I D - 30 Eliz - John Flower v George Lyttster et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Flower, John ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/F11/32 - B A - 29 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower v William Rigden, Thomas Garnon et al. | ||
*STAC 5/F8/3 - B A C I D - 30 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower v William Rigden, Thomas Gamon et al | *STAC 5/F8/3 - B A C I D - 30 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower v William Rigden, Thomas Gamon et al | ||
− | *STAC 5/F10/12 - B A - 32 Eliz - John Flower, Edward Conyers, John Brickles v William Rigdon, Edward Marrowe, James Willowes et al | + | *STAC 5/F10/12 - B A - 32 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower, Edward Conyers, John Brickles v William Rigdon, Edward Marrowe, James Willowes et al |
− | *STAC 7/21/20 - - - John Flower v William Rygdon et al | + | *STAC 7/21/20 - - - Lincolnshire - John Flower v William Rygdon et al |
+ | **see [[STAC co Lincoln]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Flower, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F30/28 - A - 30 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower v Bartholomew Clarke, Robert Warren et al | *STAC 5/F30/28 - A - 30 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower v Bartholomew Clarke, Robert Warren et al | ||
*STAC 5/F1/33 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower v Bartylmew Clarck, Robert Warren | *STAC 5/F1/33 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower v Bartylmew Clarck, Robert Warren | ||
− | * | + | **see [[STAC co Lincoln]] |
− | |||
− | |||
− | *STAC | ||
''' Flower, Lancelot ''' | ''' Flower, Lancelot ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/F1/31 - B Dr - Mich 36/37 Eliz - | + | *STAC 5/F1/31 - B Dr - Mich 36/37 Eliz - Cambridge - Lancelot Flower v Richard Arkinstall, John Goddard, Thomas Jervis, Nicholas Massie et al |
+ | **see [[STAC co Cambridge]] | ||
''' Flower, Martin ''' | ''' Flower, Martin ''' | ||
Line 51: | Line 76: | ||
''' Flower, Thomas ''' | ''' Flower, Thomas ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/F9/28 - B - 33 Eliz - | + | *STAC 5/F9/28 - B - 33 Eliz - Herefordshire - Thomas Flower v Dame Sibill Morton, John Baker et al |
*STAC 5/F8/26 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Herefordshire - Thomas Flower v John Baker, Thomas Moreton et al | *STAC 5/F8/26 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Herefordshire - Thomas Flower v John Baker, Thomas Moreton et al | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co Hereford]] | ||
''' Bevan Case Index ''' | ''' Bevan Case Index ''' | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*Flower v Browne - STAC 5/F14/13 | *Flower v Browne - STAC 5/F14/13 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*Flower v Hardkyn - STAC 5/F19/7, STAC 5/F12/4, STAC 5/F16/37 | *Flower v Hardkyn - STAC 5/F19/7, STAC 5/F12/4, STAC 5/F16/37 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
*STAC 5/F2/17 - Francis Flower, by letters patent granted the office of printing in Latin Greek and Hebrew for the Queen | *STAC 5/F2/17 - Francis Flower, by letters patent granted the office of printing in Latin Greek and Hebrew for the Queen | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 11:00, 10 May 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Flower, Ambrose
- STAC 5/F4/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Ambrose Flower et al v Christopher Stone et al
Flower, Francis
- STAC 5/F25/24 - B - - Francis Flower, Christopher Barker et al v Sampson Clerke, Garoth Jaymes
- STAC 5/F28/17 - B - 28 Eliz - Francis Flower, Christopher Barker et al v Roger Ward, Richard Mantell
- STAC 5/F5/1 - I D - 27 Eliz - Francis Flower, Christopher Barker et al v Robert Robinson et al
- STAC 5/F2/17 - B A I D - Mich 27/28 Eliz - Francis Flower, Christopher Barker, John Wyght, William Norton, John Harrison, Garret Dewes, Richard Watkins v Thomas Dunn, Robert Robinson.
- STAC 5/F17/4 - Moved to STAC Fowler
Flower, Francis
- STAC 5/F7/7 - B A - 26 Eliz - Francis Flower v Edward Smith, Robert Bourne, Henry Jefferson
Flower, John
- STAC 5/F20/8 - B A Rn - 14 Eliz - John Flower v George Mackwith, Thomas Stevens et al
- STAC 5/F25/38 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Flower v George Mackworth, Thomas Baylie et al
- STAC 5/F15/33 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Flower v George Mackwerth
- see also STAC Fowler
Flower, John
- STAC 5/F31/12 - Rn - 19 Eliz - John Flower v Francis Parker, Thomas Stephens et al
Flower, John
- STAC 5/F19/7 - B A Rn Rr - 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Flower v John Hardikyn, John Elwell
- STAC 5/F12/4 - I D - 22 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Flower v John Hardkyn, John Ilwell
- STAC 5/F16/37 - I D - 20 Eliz - Wiltshire - John Flower v John Ellwell
Flower, John
- STAC 5/F11/23 - B A - 20 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Jasper Coales et al.
- STAC 5/F4/37 - I D - 21 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v Jasper Coles, John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al
- STAC 5/F31/35 - Rn - - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al
- see STAC co Rutland
Flower, John
- STAC 5/F25/1 - B Dr - 20 Eliz - John Flower v Edward Norwich, John Dickenson et al
- STAC 5/F20/2 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Flower v Richard Fowler, Thomas Thorpe et al
- STAC 5/F30/38 - Rn - - John Flower v Richard Fowler
- STAC 5/F14/13 - B A C I D - 26 Eliz - John Flowre v John Browne et al
Flower, John
- STAC 5/F17/14 - B A - 28 Eliz - John Flower v Bennet Anton
- STAC 5/F22/40 - I D - 28 Eliz - John Flower v Bennet Anten et al
Flower, John
- STAC 5/F24/38 - B - - John Flower v John Cottington
- STAC 5/F23/1 - I D - 28 Eliz - John Flower v John Cottyngton
- STAC 5/F14/30 - A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - John Flower v John Collington
Flower, John
- STAC 5/F6/29 - A - 30 Eliz - John Flower v Thomas Lister, John Midleton et al
- STAC 5/F17/38 - I D - 30 Eliz - John Flower v George Lyttster et al
Flower, John
- STAC 5/F11/32 - B A - 29 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower v William Rigden, Thomas Garnon et al.
- STAC 5/F8/3 - B A C I D - 30 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower v William Rigden, Thomas Gamon et al
- STAC 5/F10/12 - B A - 32 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower, Edward Conyers, John Brickles v William Rigdon, Edward Marrowe, James Willowes et al
- STAC 7/21/20 - - - Lincolnshire - John Flower v William Rygdon et al
- see STAC co Lincoln
Flower, John
- STAC 5/F30/28 - A - 30 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower v Bartholomew Clarke, Robert Warren et al
- STAC 5/F1/33 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lincolnshire - John Flower v Bartylmew Clarck, Robert Warren
- see STAC co Lincoln
Flower, Lancelot
- STAC 5/F1/31 - B Dr - Mich 36/37 Eliz - Cambridge - Lancelot Flower v Richard Arkinstall, John Goddard, Thomas Jervis, Nicholas Massie et al
Flower, Martin
- STAC 5/F2/31 - B A - Mich 36/37 Eliz - Martin Flower v Thomas Vyone, Humphrey Lucas et uxor, John Dove
Flower, Thomas
- STAC 5/F9/28 - B - 33 Eliz - Herefordshire - Thomas Flower v Dame Sibill Morton, John Baker et al
- STAC 5/F8/26 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Herefordshire - Thomas Flower v John Baker, Thomas Moreton et al
- see STAC co Hereford
Bevan Case Index
- Flower v Browne - STAC 5/F14/13
- Flower v Hardkyn - STAC 5/F19/7, STAC 5/F12/4, STAC 5/F16/37
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 5/F2/17 - Francis Flower, by letters patent granted the office of printing in Latin Greek and Hebrew for the Queen