Difference between revisions of "STAC Armiger"

From Waalt
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Armiger, Arthur'''  
 
''' Armiger, Arthur'''  
*STAC 5/A21/7 - B - 12 Eliz - Arthur Armiger v Philip Simond
+
*STAC 5/A21/7 - B - 12 Eliz - - Arthur Armiger v Philip Simond
 +
 
 +
''' Armiger, William '''
 +
*STAC 5/A49/15 - B A - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Anthony Fairefax
 +
 
 +
''' Armiger, William '''
 +
*STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
 +
*STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al
 +
**[[STAC co Norfolk]]
  
 
''' Armiger, William '''  
 
''' Armiger, William '''  
*STAC 5/A49/15 - B A - 36 Eliz - William Armiger v Anthony Fairefax
 
*STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
 
*STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al
 
 
*STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al  
 
*STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al  
*STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - William Armiger v John Barber et al
+
*STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v John Barber et al
*STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
+
*STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
*STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al
+
*STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al
 
+
**[[STAC co Norfolk]]
'''Bevan Case Index '''
 
*Armiger v Barber - STAC 5/A3/26, STAC 5/A24/8, STAC 5/A30/8, STAC 5/A57/23
 
*Armiger v Fairfax - STAC 5/A49/15
 
*Armiger v Symonds - STAC 5/A21/7
 
*Armiger v Whitney - STAC 5/A2/4, STAC 5/A26/29
 
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
*STAC 5/A2/4 - Robert Whitney a man of evil and lewd life and conversation
 
*STAC 5/A2/4 - Possibly Burnham and [King's] Lynne, Norfolk. [http://wiki.whitneygen.org/wrg/index.php/Archive:STAC_5/A2/4 (See Note] which also suggests that STAC 5/A26/29 is related).
 
*STAC 5/A3/26 - William Arminger the elder of North Creake in Norfolk gentleman. In re the manor of Hillham in Holkham, Norfolk
 

Latest revision as of 11:13, 26 April 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Armiger, Arthur

  • STAC 5/A21/7 - B - 12 Eliz - - Arthur Armiger v Philip Simond

Armiger, William

  • STAC 5/A49/15 - B A - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Anthony Fairefax

Armiger, William

  • STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
  • STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al

Armiger, William

  • STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al
  • STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v John Barber et al
  • STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
  • STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections