STAC co Flint

From Waalt

Flint

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Edwards: A Catalogue of Star Chamber Proceedings Relating to Wales compiled by Ifan ab Owen Edwards, Cardiff U P 1929

A

Almoner v ap Nicholas

  • STAC 5/A15/22 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hertfordshire, Flint - Almoner v Griffin ap Nicholas ap Powel, Griffith ap John Griffith
    • Whereas one Ithell ap Nicholas Appell of the parish of Estbarnard co Hartford did . . . drown and desroy himself. felo de se
  • STAC 5/A4/30 - B - 32 Eliz - Hertfordshire, Flint - Almoner v Griffin ap Nicholas ap Powell, John ap Nicholas alias Griffin ap Edward, Griffith ap John Griffith
  • STAC 5/A20/29 - B A - 10 Eliz - Hertfordshire, Flint - Almoner v William Williams see STAC Williams
    • Edwards: Page 70. Richard Fletcher bishop of Bristol almoner v Griffith ap Nicholas ap Powell, John ap Nicholas alias Griffith ap Edward, and Griffith ap John Griffith, of Cilcyn and Mold.
    • see also STAC Welsh names Almoner and STAC co Hertford

B

Bold v ap William

  • STAC 5/B113/22 - A - - Flint - Richard Boold v David ap William, John Parker et al
    • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo.12r. In a matter of riot inter Bold, plaintiff, and David ap William et al, perjury in the defendants examined, punished at the hearing. Trinity 12 Elizabeth (kk)
  • STAC 5/B95/8 - D - 12 Eliz - Flint - Richard Bolde v David Ap William
    • Deponents: David ap Williams of Moulde co Flint yeoman, Hugh Trevor of Moulde gent, John Parker of Moulde
  • STAC 5/B57/40 - C I D - 12 Eliz - Flint - Richard Bolde v Hugh Trevor

Brereton v Hanmer

  • STAC 5/B39/27 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Flint - Roger Brereton, Richard Symonds v William Hanmer, Andrew Brayne et al
    • Roger Brereton and Richard Symons of Halton co Flint and William Hanmer of Fennes co Flint. Concerns matters arising from a case before the Council of the Marches of Wales.
    • see also STAC Brereton and Carrison v Brereton

Brereton v Puleston

  • STAC 5/B46/37 - B - 41 Eliz - Flint - Sir Randoffe Brereton, Thomas Hanmer v Roger Puleston, William Dymocke

C

Carrison v Brereton

  • STAC 5/C24/3 - A R C I D - 20 Eliz - Flint - William Carryson et al v Roger Brerton Sr, Roger Brerton Jr, Richard Symons, Richard Hanmer et al

Conway v Conway

  • STAC 7/11/7 - - - Flint - Edward, Conwey, Henry Conwey v John Conwey
    • TNA Note: Rhuddlan, liberties of: Forcible entry and assault
    • Edwards: Page 70
  • STAC 5/C13/32 - B - 5 Eliz - Flint - Edward Conwaye v John Conwaye
  • STAC 5/C31/38 - I D - 10 Eliz - Flint - Edward Conway, Henry Conway v John Conway et al
    • STAC 5/C13/32 and STAC 5/C31/38 not in Edwards
    • see also STAC Conway

Conway, Edward

  • STAC 5/C65/1 - B A - 20 Eliz - Flint - Edward Conway v William ap Edward
  • STAC 5/C76/22 - I D - 20 Eliz - Flint - Edward Conway v Maddock ap John, Ralf Robert et al
    • Edwards: Page 70 (cf M39/28)
  • STAC 5/C63/7 - A - 20 Eliz - Flint - Edward Conwey v Jeremiah ap Gruff, Edward ap Maddock et al
  • STAC 5/C35/19 - I D - 20 Eliz - Flint - Edward Conway v William ap Edward
    • STAC 5/C63/7 and STAC 5/C35/19 are not in Edwards
    • see also STAC Conway

D

Davies v ap Roberts

  • STAC 5/D25/25 - B A - 38 Eliz - Flint - John Davyes v Robert ap John ap Roberts, Robert ap John Davyes et al

Earl of Derby v ap Ellis

  • STAC 5/D37/18 - B A - 12 Eliz - Flint - Edward Earl of Darby, v John Ap Ellis, John Deekay, William Thomaset al
  • STAC 5/D30/35 - I D - 13 Eliz - Flint - Edward Earl of Derby v John ap Ellys, William Thomas, John Deckay et al

E

Edowe v Hanmer

  • STAC 5/E1/10 - B Dr - Hil 29 Eliz - Flint - Thomas Edowe v William Hanmer, Thomas Hanmer, John Egerton, Humphrey Thomas, Richard Nickson, Thomas Nickson, John Nickson
    • Thomas Edowe of Tybroughton co Flint gent. Land in Tybroughton. STAC 5/E1/10
    • see also STAC Edowe

Eddowe v Maddock

  • STAC 5/E9/20 - B A C I D - 38 Eliz - Flint - Richard Eddowe v John Maddocke
    • see TNA C 78/90/5 Eleanor Maddock, daughter of John Maddock v David Edowe, Richard Edowe his son, John Edowe and John Dodd. Inheritance of a watermill, closes called Withwood, New Leysowe, Henvas and the Myll Field in Iscoyd, Flintshire, formerly of Thomas Colly of Iscoyd. 37 Eliz.
    • see also STAC Edowe

F

G

Grovenor, v Salisbury

  • STAC 5/G20/8 - B A C I D - 15 Eliz - Flint - John Grovesner v Folk Salisbury, George Hill et al
    • John Grovesner, gent. Subornation, perjury. The defendants were paid by Salisbury to swear in court that Salisbury had a lawful lease for the term of his life for land that Grosvenor claimed to belong to him. The defendants all claimed to be witnesses to the agreement. (mg)
  • STAC 5/G31/14 - B A - 16 Eliz - Flint - John Grovenor v Foulk Salisbury
  • STAC 5/G6/9 - I D - 15 Eliz - Flint - John Gravenor v Foulk Salisbury
  • STAC 5/G40/2 - I D - 16 Eliz - Flint - John Gravenor v Folke Salisburye
    • STAC 5/G31/14, STAC 5/G6/9 and STAC 5/G40/2 are not in Edwards
    • Edwards: Page 71
    • see also STAC Grosvenor

H

Hanmer v Hanmer

  • STAC 5/H4/14 - B A Rn - 7 Eliz - Flint - Mary Hanmer v Randulph Hanmer, Thomas Hanmer, Richard Eyton, Robert Ellis, Robert ap Thomas, John Decka et al
    • Edwards: Page 71
  • STAC 5/H45/11 - I D - 8 Eliz - Flint - Mary Hanmer v Sir Thomas Hamer
    • STAC 5/H45/11 is not in Edwards
    • A possible connected suit STAC 5/H54/11 -11 Eliz - Sir Thomas Hanmer v Mary Hanmer
    • see also STAC Hanmer

Hanmer v Brereton

  • STAC 5/H35/33 - B - 41 Eliz - William Hamner v Sir Randle Brereton et al
    • Edwards: Page 71
    • see also STAC Hanmer and Brereton v Puleston above

ap Howell v ap Rice

  • STAC 5/H15/35 - B A C - 22 Eliz - Flint - Thomas ap Howell v Roger ap Rice, Peares ap Price

ap Hugh v ap Gruff

  • STAC 5/H78/28 - B - 19 Eliz - Flint - Thomas ap Hugh v Jonae Elie ap Gruff, Ievan ap Thomas et al

IJ

ap Ievan v ap Hugh

  • STAC 5/J12/40 - B A C I D - 32 Eliz - Flint - David ap Ievan v Edward ap Hugh, Robert Lloyd, Roger Williams et al

ap Ievan v Williams

  • STAC 5/J2/22 - B - - Flint - John ap Ievan v Roger Williams, Edward ap Hugh
  • STAC 7/10/25 - - - Flint - John ap Jevan, v Robert Lloyde, Edward ap Hugh

ap Ievan v ap Ithell

  • STAC 5/J9/40 - B - 37 Eliz - Flint - Reynalte ap Ievan v Robert ap Ithell, Ievan ap Ithell et al
  • STAC 5/J19/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - Flint - Renuilte ap Ievan v Richard ap John

ap John v Lloyd

  • STAC 5/J22/32 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 22 Eliz - Flint - William ap John v Edward Lloyd, John ap David, David ap Lloid
  • STAC 5/J9/37 - I D - 22 Eliz - Flint - William ap John v Edward Loid, William ap Ievan et al

Jones v verch Edward

  • STAC 5/J6/18 - B A C - 20 Eliz - Flint - Griffith Jones v Maud verch Edward
    • Edwards: Page 72. Edwards says anno 10 Eliz
    • see also STAC Jones

Jones v Jones

  • STAC 5/J15/8 - B A Rn Rr - 20 Eliz - Flint - Robert Jones v Glyn Jones
  • STAC 5/J11/40 - I D - 20 Eliz - Flint - Robert Johnes v Howell Appary, Hugh ap Howell
  • STAC 5/J6/35 - C I D - 21 Eliz - Flint - Robert Jones v Howell ap John ap Harry, Hugh ap Howel et al
  • STAC 5/J3/23 - I D - 21 Eliz - Flint - Robert Johnes v Oliver Johnes
    • Edwards: Page 72 (cf J16/9 and 62/40)
    • see also STAC Jones

Jones v Powell

  • STAC 5/J16/7 - B A - 40 Eliz - Flint - Robert Johnes v Richard Powell
  • STAC 5/J16/14 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - Elizabeth Jonnes, Robert Jonnes v Richard Powell

ap John v ap Ievan

  • STAC 7/10/26 - - - Flint - William ap John v Robert ap Ievan, Rice ap Ievan et al

K

L

Lewis v ap Ithell

  • STAC 5/L46/14 - B A - 34 Eliz - Flint - Richard Lewis v Ievan ap Itholl, Thomas ap Hoell et al

Lewes v John ap Ithell

  • STAC 5/L41/5 - B - - Flint - Richard Lewes v John ap Ithell, Elizabeth verch Ithell, Ievan ap John ap Meredith et Jane uxor et al

Lyghtfoot v ap Howell

  • STAC 5/L9/15 - B A Rn Rr - 3 Eliz - Flint - George Lyghtfoot et Katherine uxor v Griffith Thomas ap Howell, Bennet ap Richard et al

Lloyd v Griffith

  • STAC 5/L25/14 - B A - 17 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Lloid v Peyrs Gryffith, Jonet David
  • STAC 5/L7/32 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Lloid v Jonet David

Lloyd v Davies

  • STAC 5/L9/24 - B A - 37 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloid v Robert Davies, John ap William et al
  • STAC 5/L21/32 - B A C I D - 37 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloyd v David Williams et al
  • STAC 5/L7/39 - I D - 37 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloid v Robert Davies, John ap Williams et al
    • Edwards: Page 72
  • STAC 5/L30/1 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloyd v Robert Davies, William ap John
    • STAC 5/L30/1 is not in Edwards
    • see also STAC Lloyd

Lloyd v Lloyd

  • STAC 5/L33/18 - B A - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloyd v Robert Lloyd, John ap William et al
  • STAC 5/L39/12 - A Rn C I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - William Lloid v Robert Lloid, Griffith Mountford et al
  • STAC 5/L31/39 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloid v Robert Lloyd
  • STAC 5/L10/7 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloid v John ap William et al
  • STAC 5/L10/9 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloyd v Griffith Mountford et al

M

Meredith v Whitford

  • STAC 5/M1/20 - B A - Hil 42 Eliz - Flint - John ap William Meredith v Thomas Whitford alias Powell, Richard Whitford alias Powell
    • Edwards: Page 73
  • STAC 5/M16/4 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Flint - John ap William Meredith v Thomas Whitford, Richard Whitford alias Powell
  • STAC 5/M30/33 - I D - 42 Eliz - Flint - William ap John Meredith v Thomas Powell alias Whitford
    • STAC 5/M16/4 and STAC 5/M30/33 are not in Edwards
    • see also STAC Meredith

Myddleton v Hanmer

  • STAC 5/M19/13 - B A - 29 Eliz - Flint - Jane Myddleton v John Hanmer et uxor, George Salisbury et al
  • STAC 5/M24/9 - B A C - 29 Eliz - Flint - Mary Myddelton, Richard Myddelton v George Salisbury, John Mersh
    • Edwards: Page 73
  • STAC 5/M18/16 - I D - 29 Eliz - Flint - Jane Midleton v Hugh Clough et al
  • STAC 5/M5/25 - B - 28 Eliz - Flint - Richard Myddleton v John Hanmer et uxor, George Salysbury, John Marshe, Hugh Cloughe, John Dayhurste
    • STAC 5/M18/16 and STAC 5/M5/25 are not in Edwards
    • see also STAC Middleton

Moore v Conway

  • STAC 5/M39/28 - B A - 19 Eliz - Flint - William More v Edward Conwey, John ap Howell ap Ken’ et al
  • STAC 5/M26/18 - I D - 25 Eliz - Flint - William More v Edward Conway, Thomas ap Richard ap Henry
    • Edwards: Page 73 (cf STAC 5/C65/1)
  • STAC 7/26/22 - - - Flint - William Moore v Edward Conwaye et al
    • STAC 7/26/22 is not in Edwards
    • see also STAC Moore

Mutton v Mostyn

  • STAC 5/M56/5 - B A Rn - Flint - Peter Mutton v William Mostyn, Henry Birkinhead et al
    • Edwards: Page 73
  • STAC 5/M7/13 - I D - 10 Eliz - Flint - Peter Mutton v William Glazier, William Moston

N

O

P

Pearce v Bythell

  • STAC 5/P2/32 - B Dr - 37 Eliz - Flint - Thomas Pearce v John Bythell, Henry ap John David, William ap Hugh ap Rice ap Jenkin, Thomas ap Morgan et al

Pirs v Brereton

  • STAC 5/P4/7 - B - 39 Eliz - Flint - Henry Pirs, William Jones v Vrion Brereton, Robert Salesbury, George Manly, John Pirs, Hugh Kenricke

ap Piers v ap Griffith

  • STAC 5/P64/13 - B A - 25 Eliz - Flint - John Thomas ap Piers v Harrye ap Griffith, Peter Powel et al

Powell v verch Howell

  • STAC 5/P67/17 - B - - Flint - Kenrick Powell v Katherine verch Howell ap Ievan, Thomas ap Edward et Gwensey uxor

Price v Sandys

  • STAC 5/P53/36 - I D - 27 Eliz - Flint - Griffith Price v Robert Norris, George Gale et al
  • STAC 5/P54/1 - I D - 25 Eliz - Flint - Griffith Pryce v Walter Sands, Robert Jones et al
  • STAC 5/P58/38 - I - 24 Eliz - Flint - Griffith Pryce v Walter Sandes, John Monk et al
  • STAC 5/P52/23 - I - 24 Eliz - Flint - Griffith Pryce v Ellis Madock, Walter Sands et al
  • STAC 5/P56/5 - I D - 24 Eliz - Flint - Griffith Price v Ellis Maddok, Hugh Johnes
  • STAC 5/P43/7 - I D - 24 Eliz - Flint - Griffith Price v Griffith Jones alias Griffith ap John Thomas, John Monck et al
  • STAC 5/P15/18 - I - 19 Eliz - Flint - Griffith Price v Walter Sandis, Ellis Madock et al
  • STAC 5/P50/31 - I D - 24 Eliz - Flint - Sir Fryth Pryce v Walter Sanys, Elizabeth Maddox

Price v Jones

  • STAC 5/P41/2 - B A Rn Rr - 17 Eliz - Flint - John Pryce, Robert Jones v Griffith Jones clericus, William Mostyn, Thomas Taylor et al
  • STAC 5/P13/24 - B A - 17 Eliz - Flint - John Price, Robert Jones v Howell ap John ap Harry
  • STAC 5/P32/33 - I D - 17 Eliz - Flint - John Pryce v Ievan ap John, Thomas Jones et al
  • STAC 5/P24/38 - I D - 18 Eliz - Flint - John Price, Robert Jones v Harry ap John ap Howel
    • Edwards: Page 73
  • STAC 5/P27/36 - I D - 18 Eliz - Flint - John Pryce v William Mosten et al
    • STAC 5/P27/36 is not in Edwards
    • Edwards also lists STAC 5/P36/33 for which see Price v Mostyn below
    • see also STAC Price

Price v Mostyn

  • STAC 5/P62/40 - B A C - 23 Eliz - Flint - John Price, Robert Jones v Henry Mostyn, Richard Mostyn, Hugh ap Powell et al
    • Edwards: Page 74 (cf STAC 5/J15/8 and STAC 5/P41/2
  • STAC 5/P36/33 - I D - 22 Eliz - Flint - John Pryce, Robert Jones v Robert Lloyd et al
    • STAC 5/P36/33 Edwards says part of Price v Jones (STAC 5/P41/2) above
    • see also STAC Price

Q

R

Roberts v Hugh ap Rees

  • STAC 5/R1/35 - B - 41 Eliz - Flint - John Roberts v Hugh ap Rees, Richard ap Hugh, Edward ap Robert, Simon ap Meredythe
  • STAC 7/28/15 - - - Flint - John Robertes v Simon ap Meredith

S

Salisbury ap Maddock

  • STAC 5/S51/4 - B A C - 22 Eliz - Flint - Thomas Salisbury v Madock ap Edward ap John, Ievan ap Humfry et al
  • STAC 5/S72/40 - B - 22 Eliz - Thomas Salisbury v Thomas Salisbury Sr, Henry Paice et al
  • STAC 7/29/4 - - - Flint - ?Thomas Salesbury (no further information as yet)
    • Edwards: Thomas Salesbury of Llewenny esquire v Ken ap Thomas, John ap Edward ap Madock, Humffrey ap Ievan, et al. Possession of an estate of inheritance at Flint.
    • see also STAC Salisbury

T

Trevor v Southey

  • STAC 5/T2/21 - B A - 36 Eliz - Flint - John Trevor v Edward ap Roger, Owen Santhey, Thomas ap William alias Santhey, Griffith Bowld, John Griffith
  • STAC 5/T27/15 - I D - 36 Eliz - Flint - John Trevor v Owen Southey
  • STAC 5/T7/13 - I D - 36 Eliz - Flint - John Trevor v Thomas ap William alias Sauthey, William Hughes
    • Edwards: Page 74
  • STAC 7/30/41 - A - 36 Eliz - Flint - John Trevor v Thomas Southey, William Hughes

UV

W

Whitford v Episc. St Asaph

  • STAC 5/W21/38 - B A - 3 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Whitforde v Thomas Bishop of St Asaph, William Mostyn et al
  • STAC 5/W31/20 - A C I D - 8 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Whitford v William Mostyn, Thomas Bishop of St Asaph
    • Edwards: Page 74
  • STAC 5/W67/18 - B A C - 8 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Whytford v Thomas Bishop of St Asaph, William Mustien et al
  • STAC 5/W9/39 - A - - Flint - Hugh Whitford v Thomas Bishop of St Asaph
    • STAC 5/W67/18 and STAC 5/W9/39 are not in Edwards
    • see also STAC Whitford

Williams v Whitacres and Mitton

  • STAC 5/W2/9 - B A I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Mytton, John Whitacres, Lewes ap Hughe, John ap Rees alias Glasse, Thomas David ap John
  • STAC 5/W52/4 - B A - 42 Eliz - Flint - Roger William v John Mitton, John Whittacres et al
  • STAC 5/W39/6 - A - 42 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John ap Grass alias Rees
  • STAC 5/W59/13 - C I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Mytton, John Roberts et al
  • STAC 5/W69/2 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Mitton, John Whitacres et al
  • STAC 5/W75/16 - I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v Glasse alias Rees ap John, Owen ap Daivd et al

Williams v Whitacres and Mitton

  • STAC 5/W76/1 - B A C - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Whytacres, John Mytton et al

XYX

  • STAC 10/1/109 - D - - Flint - - [Unknown] v [Unknown] TNA Note:Incomplete deposition of Harry ap Harry, concerning an alleged assault and riot in Flintshire


  • A Catalogue of Star Chamber Proceedings Relating to Wales compiled by Ifan ab Owen Edwards, Cardiff U P 1929


Palmer's cumulative totals of Star Chamber fines preserved in the E159s (rp)

  • TNA E159/360 Trinity Term, 12 Elizabeth. Fine paid
    • From Hugh Trevor de Moulde, Flynt: £20.
    • From David ap William Lloid de Moulde, Flint: £60.
    • From John Parker de Moulde, Flint: £20.

Possibilities

Dymmoke v Hanmer

  • STAC 5/D38/16 - Rr - - Humfrey Dymmoke v Sir Thomas Hanmer
    • see also STAC 2/13Folio 223-226. Humphrey Dymmok v Sir Thomas Hanmer, Richard ap Powell, Randall Jenken, and others Riotous assembly and rebuilding of the mill-head at Halghton, Flint.
    • see STAC Dymocke