STAC Catesby
From Waalt
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Catesby, Edward
- STAC 5/C49/10 - B- 37 Eliz - - Edward Catesby v Kenelme Catesby, Michael Clipsham
Catesby, Edward
- STAC 5/C21/11 - B - 39 Eliz - Northamptonshire - Edward Catesby v Richard Caperne, Roger Peake, John Langford et al
Catesby, Isabel and Thomas
- STAC 5/C66/30 - B A Rn - 1 Eliz - Northamptonshire - Isabell Catesbie, Thomas Catesbie v John West, John Knight et al
- STAC 5/C56/6 - I D - 1 Eliz - Northamptonshire - Thomas Catesby v John Packyngton, Elizabeth Lane et al
Catesby, Thomas
- STAC 5/C29/15 - B A - 2 Eliz - - Thomas Catesbye v Thomas Thurland, John Burchall, John Danford et al
Catesby, Thomas
- STAC 5/C30/17 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Catesbye v John Headworthe, Ralph Mason, Richard Shackleford et al
- STAC 5/C21/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - - Thomas Catesbye v John Allen, Thomas [blank] et al
Catesby, William
- STAC 5/C47/17 - B A - 19 Eliz - - Sir William Catesbye v Henry Olyver, George Checkley et al
- STAC 5/C60/11 - I D - 19 Eliz - - Sir William Catesbye v George Checklie, Henry Oliver et al
- STAC 7/19/15 - - - - Sir William Catesbye v George Checkly et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 12v. For receiving of seminaries and Jesuits and contemptuously refusing to be examined or to answer the privy council. Attorney Rex, plaintiff; the Lord Vaux, Sir Thomas Tresham, knight, Sir William Catesby, et al, defendants: convicted for entertaining of seminaries and Jesuits and contemptuously refusing to answer the privy council upon their such receiving of them, for which the said Lord Vaux was fined at £1000 the other 1000 marks but Griffin at £500 and to continue prisoners until the Queen’s further pleasure and that they conform themselves. Michaelmas Elizabeth 23 and 24 (kk)
