Syllabus: The Music of Chopin | |||||
MUSI 6397 | section 29745 | Spring 2020 | MW 10:00-11:30 | MSM rm 116 | University of Houston |
Dr. Timothy Koozin |
office: 148 | (713) 743-3318 |
http://www.uh.edu/~tkoozin/ | Office hours: M 12:00-1:00 and by appt. |
Course Description: Analytical and historical studies on the music of Frédéric Chopin, with particular attention to the preludes and ballades. Class meetings will take the form of a seminar. Preparation and readiness to contribute in each class discussion is the student's responsibility.
Course objectives and learning outcomes:
Prerequisite: Upper-level undergraduate standing or graduate standing in music.
Textbooks:
Jim Samson. Chopin: The Four Ballades.(Cambridge University Press, 1992)
Robert Hatten. A Theory of Virtual Agency for Western Art Music (Indiana University Press, 2018)
The Cambridge Companion to Chopin. ed. Jim Samson (Cambridge University Press, 1992). E-book available with UH login.
Highly Recommended: Scores for the complete Preludes, Ballades, Mazurkas, and Nocturnes
Other study materials will be available at UH Blackboard
Grading: First paper 30%
Term paper 30%
Class participarion and short assignments 40%
Students are expected to comply with UH Policies on Academic Honesty.
Students with disabilities are asked to bring to the instructor's attention any special accommodations they may require. Students will document a disability with the UH Center for Students with Disabilities (phone: 713 743-5400). The CSD will provide recommendations to help the instructor and student accommodate a disability.
Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS) can help students who are having difficulties managing stress, adjusting to college, or feeling sad and hopeless. You can reach CAPS (www.uh.edu/caps/) by calling 713-743-5454 during and after business hours for routine appointments or if you or someone you know is in crisis. Also, there is no appointment necessary for the “Let's Talk” program, which is a drop-in consultation service at convenient locations and hours around campus. http://www.uh.edu/caps/outreach/lets_talk.html.
Readings and Works for Analysis (Subject to change)
1. Historical background; phrase rhythm and tonal architecture
The Cambridge Companion to Chopin: Chronology, Introduction, and Chapter 1 (Janet Ritterman on Piano music and the public concert, 1800-1850)
W. Rothstein. Phrase Rhythm in Tonal Music
Ch 1, What is a phrase? What is Phrase Rhythm UH Blackboard
Ch 7, Chopin: Nocturnes, Mazurkas, and Etudes UH Blackboard
Works for close study:
Nocturne in E flat major, Op. 9, No. 2 (1830)
Mazurka in A flat major, Op. 17, No.3 (1832-33)
Etude in E major, Op. 10, No. 3 (1829-32)
Nocturne Op. 32, No. 1 (1836-37)
Mazurka in G sharp minor, Op. 33, No.1 (1837-38)
Mazurka in A minor, Op. 59, No.1 (1845)
Nocturne in F sharp minor, Op. 48, No. 2 (1841)
Nocturne in B major, Op. 62, No. 1 (1846)The Cambridge Companion to Chopin, Chapter 2 (David Rowland on the nocturne)
The Cambridge Companion to Chopin, Chapter 4 (John Rink on tonal architecture in the early music)
Robert Hatten. A Theory of Virtual Agency for Western Art Music. Introduction and Chapters 1 & 2
Be ready to discuss these terms and concepts:
Gesture (spontaneous, thematic, rhetorical, dialogical, tropological)
Gestural variation
Virtual human agency, levels of agency, virtual environments
Steve Larson's musical forces
Consider connections between the Rothstein and Hatten readings. Be ready to discuss how metrical levels and phrase rhythm might be understood as a musical forces operating within a virtual environment.Written assignment: Select one piece discussed in class and/or mentioned in the assigned readings. Mark a copy of the complete score in detail, showing all significant aspects of harmony, form, and motivic content. Write a short essay, 1-2 pages in length, in which you provide an interpretive analysis of the piece. Be sure to draw from the assigned readings as you explain your interpretive commentary on the music. Your essay and annotated score is due Tuesday, February 5 (or Wednesday, Feb 6)
Reader response essay: Write a short essay, 1-2 pages in length, on the Robert Hatten reading, Introduction and chapters 1 & 2. Describe a particular aspect of Hatten's methodology in delving into the Schubert and Brahms pieces.
2. Miniatures and fragments; musical gesture
Charles Rosen. The Romantic Generation (Cambridge, 1995), Ch 2, Fragments UH Blackboard
Works for close study:
Schumann. Dichterliebe, No. 1, 2, & 11
Chopin. Nocturne in B major, Op. 32, No. 1
Chopin. Prelude in A minor, Op. 28, No. 2
Chopin. Prelude in F major, Op. 28, No. 23The Cambridge Companion to Chopin, Chapter 6 (Jeffrey Kallberg on small ‘forms’)
William Rothstein. “Like Falling off a Log: Rubato in Chopin's Prelude in A-flat Major (op. 28, no. 17)” Music Theory Online 18/4, 2012. http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.05.11.1/mto.05.11.1.rothstein_frames.html
Carl Schachter. "The Prelude in E minor Op. 28 No. 4: autograph sources and interpretation" in Chopin Studies 2. ed. J. Rink and J. Samson (Cambridge, 1994) UH Blackboard
Eugene Montague. “Instrumental Gesture in Chopin’s Étude in A-Flat Major, Op. 25, No. 1.” Music Theory Online 11/1, 2005. http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.12.18.4/mto.12.18.4.montague.php
Robert Hatten. Chapters 3 & 4
Written assignment: Write a two-page reader response essay on one of our recent readings (Rosen, Klein, Kallberg, Schachter, Rothstein, Montague). Summarize the most significant aspects of the writer's analytical point of view and methodology, also commenting on how those ideas are applied in discussion of specific musical passages. Due date TBA.First paper. Write a six-page essay on a Chopin work of your choice. A moderately sized single-movement work is recommended, perhaps a mazurka, nocturne, prelude, or etude. Include a copy of the score with detailed harmonic and formal analysis of the full movement. Your essay should express a clear analytical point of view of the music, with the goal of forming an interpretive analysis of the piece. Clearly explain your methodological approach, drawing on methodologies we have discussed in our readings. Due: Tuesday, March 20.
Discussion of topics for first papers
Meetings with guest speakers, TBA
Beethoven 250 Houston 2020 Festival:
Thursday, February 20 Concert: Formosa Quartet, Asia Society Texas Center, 7:00 PM
Saturday, February 22 Concert: Formosa Quartet, Dudley Recital Hall, 7:30 PM
TSMT meeting: Friday-Saturday, February 28-29
Guest scholars in residence: Scott Burnham, Robert Hatten, James Hepokoski, William Kinderman, Michael Spitzer
Tuesday, February 25 Concert: University of Houston Wind Ensemble, Moores Opera House, 7:30 PM
Thursday, February 27 Concert: Moores School of Music Faculty Artist, Dudley Recital Hall, 7:30 PM
Friday, February 28 Concert: Moores School of Music Faculty Artists, Dudley Recital Hall, 7:30 PM
Saturday, February 29 Concert: Moores School Symphony Orchestra, Moores Opera House, 7:30 PM
3. The ballades, scherzos, and fantasies; narrative theory
The Cambridge Companion to Chopin, Chapter 5 (Extended Forms: The Ballades, Scherzos and Fantasies)
Chopin: The Four Ballades. Chapter 1, Background; Chapter 2, Genesis and Reception
William Rothstein. “Ambiguity in the Themes of Chopin's First, Second, and Fourth Ballades” Intégral, Vol. 8 (1994), pp. 1-50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40213955
Chopin: The Four Ballades. Chapter 3, Form and Design; Chapter 4, Genre
Michael Klein. Chopin's Fourth Ballade as Musical Narrative. Music Theory Spectrum, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Spring 2004), pp. 23-56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/mts.2004.26.1.23.
The Cambridge Companion to Chopin, Chapter 5 (Jim Samson on the ballades, scherzos and fantasies)
Robert Hatten. Interlude I, Chapter 9.
Discussion of term papers
Term paper. Write a six-page essay on a larger Chopin work of your choice, such as a ballade, scherzo, fantaisie, or sonata. Include a copy of the score with detailed harmonic and formal analysis of the full movement. Your essay should express a clear analytical point of view of the music, with the goal of forming an interpretive analysis of the piece. Clearly explain your methodological approach, drawing on methodologies we have discussed in our readings. Due: TBA
4. Sonatas; sonata theory
The Cambridge Companion to Chopin, Chapter 8 (Anatole Leikin on the sonatas)
Andrew Davis. “Chopin and the Romantic Sonata: The First Movement of Op. 58.” Music Theory Spectrum, 36/2 (fall 2014), pp. 270-294. UH Blackboard
Readings, Recordings, and Reference
Online Reference
David Beach. Advanced Schenkerian Analysis (Routledge, 2013) e-Book
James Hepokoski and Warren Darcy. Elements of Sonata Theory (Oxford University Press, 2006). e-Book
Kornel Michałowski and Jim Samson. Oxford Music Online: Chopin, Fryderyk Franciszek. e-Book
Books on Chopin
Chopin Studies. ed. J. Samson (Cambridge, 1988)
Chopin Studies 2. ed. J. Rink and J. Samson (Cambridge, 1994)
The Cambridge Companion to Chopin. ed. J. Samson (Cambridge, 1992)
Thomas Higgins. Frederic Chopin: Preludes, opus 28: an Authoritative Score, Historical Background, Analysis, Views and Comments (New York, 1973)
Jeffrey Kallberg. Chopin at the Boundaries (1996)
Jim Samson. Chopin: The Four Ballades (Cambridge, 1992)
Analytical studies with sections on Chopin
Byron Almén. A Theory of Musical Narrative
Chapter 1 (on Chopin's Op. 28, No. 3)
Chapter 4 (on Tarasti’s analysis of the G minor ballade).Michael Klein. Music and the Crises of the Modern Subject (Indiana University Press, 2015). E-book available with UH login.
William Rothstein. Phrase Rhythm in Tonal Music
Heinrich Schenker. Five Graphic Analyses
Carl Schachter. Unfoldings
Charles Rosen. The Romantic Generation (Cambridge, 1995)
Ch 2, Fragments
Ch 5, Chopin: Counterpoint and the Narrative Forms
Ch 6, Chopin: Virtuosity Transformed
Ch 7, Chopin: From the Miniature Genre to the Sublime StyleEero Tarasti. A Theory of Musical Semiotics. (Indiana University Press, 1994)
Chapter 6, Narrativity in Chopin (Polonaise-Fantaisie and Ballade in g minor)
Articles
Michael Klein. Chopin's Fourth Ballade as Musical Narrative. Music Theory Spectrum, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Spring 2004), pp. 23-56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/mts.2004.26.1.23.
Michael Klein. Chopin Dreams: The Mazurka in C# Minor, Op. 30, No. 4. 19th-Century Music, Vol. 35, No. 3, Chopin's Subjects (Spring, 2012), pp. 238-260. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/ncm.2012.35.3.238
Michael Klein. “Ironic Narrative, Ironic Reading,” Journal of Music Theory, Vol. 53, No. 1 (Spring 2009), pp. 95-136. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.uh.edu/stable/40606879
Eugene Montague. “Instrumental Gesture in Chopin’s Étude in A-Flat Major, Op. 25, No. 1.” Music Theory Online 18/4, 2012. http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.12.18.4/mto.12.18.4.montague.php
William Rothstein. “Ambiguity in the Themes of Chopin's First, Second, and Fourth Ballades” Intégral, Vol. 8 (1994), pp. 1-50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40213955
John Rink. Chopin's Ballades and the Dialectic: Analysis in Historical Perspective‚ Music Analysis, xiii (1994), 99-115.
Andrew Davis. “Chopin and the Romantic Sonata: The First Movement of Op. 58.” Music Theory Spectrum, 36/2 (fall 2014), pp. 270-29.