Difference between revisions of "War"

From Waalt
Line 28: Line 28:
 
'''E1309 A:''' Provisioning for the Scottish war.  Lincoln.  John de Moele v. Robert, abbot of Louth Park, John de Yerburgh, Wiliam Mabille, Andrew de Gredich, Henry de Stiston, Jordan de Foderby, Richard Cavile, Thomas de Fenne, & William son of Robert Ynttessone de Manby.  Allegation that the abbot shredded Moele's royal letters patent, assault, and imprisoned him.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no196/bKB27no196dorses/IMG_0001.htm]
 
'''E1309 A:''' Provisioning for the Scottish war.  Lincoln.  John de Moele v. Robert, abbot of Louth Park, John de Yerburgh, Wiliam Mabille, Andrew de Gredich, Henry de Stiston, Jordan de Foderby, Richard Cavile, Thomas de Fenne, & William son of Robert Ynttessone de Manby.  Allegation that the abbot shredded Moele's royal letters patent, assault, and imprisoned him.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no196/bKB27no196dorses/IMG_0001.htm]
  
'''M1310 A:''' Malicious destruction of muniments that had been put in a house at Tynemouthe for safekeeping against the Scots.  John de Whyteleye v. Brother Simon de Waldenne prior of Tynemouthe, Brother William de Waldenne co-monk, & Robert de Slykeburne chamberlain.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no202/aKB27no202fronts/IMG_0160.htm[http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no202/aKB27no202fronts/IMG_0160.htm]
+
'''M1310 A:''' Malicious destruction of muniments that had been put in a house at Tynemouthe for safekeeping against the Scots.  John de Whyteleye v. Brother Simon de Waldenne prior of Tynemouthe, Brother William de Waldenne co-monk, & Robert de Slykeburne chamberlain.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no202/aKB27no202fronts/IMG_0160.htm]
  
 
'''M1314 A:''' Diversion of wine loaded in London for transport to Berwick upon Twede to support the king and his lieges in the war.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no218/bKB27no218dorses/IMG_0050.htm]
 
'''M1314 A:''' Diversion of wine loaded in London for transport to Berwick upon Twede to support the king and his lieges in the war.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no218/bKB27no218dorses/IMG_0050.htm]

Revision as of 19:58, 5 June 2011

This page will be segmented when it gets too long. Add information by clicking on "edit" above. Items should begin with term (if available) and year together with a letter to allow for distinguishing subsequent documents in the same year and term. The designation should be in bold. Thus an entry will appear as H1285 A:. Text thereafter should indicate what the document concerns. The link to the document should be a copied and pasted full web address (http:// . . .) surrounded by single brackets ( [ ] ). Leave a line between entries. The 25-year segments begin with a vertical bar and end with a vertical bar minus. Avoid other more complex codes. If you want to append a translation, provide a completely unique address surrounded by double brackets: War H1275 A Tr. Such an address indicates sector and year, the A indicates it is the first document entered for that year and term, the Tr indicates it is a translation. That will constitute a unique address. DO NOT attempt to re-order documents within a term to achieve a perfect chronology, since it will invalidate other references to re-named documents. A document written in Notepad will copy into the site without any complicating code. Avoid more complicated coding. Check your entry before saving by clicking on "show preview below (return here by using the back arrow); before leaving the document, remember to save the page.

1225:

1250:

1275:

1300:


T1307 A: John de Ferrers v. John, vicar of Dodford. Northamptonshire. Ferrers, summoned to go with the king's army to Scotland, purchased a horse warranted to sound from the vicar. The horse was in fact lame. [1]

E1309 A: Provisioning for the Scottish war. Lincoln. John de Moele v. Robert, abbot of Louth Park, John de Yerburgh, Wiliam Mabille, Andrew de Gredich, Henry de Stiston, Jordan de Foderby, Richard Cavile, Thomas de Fenne, & William son of Robert Ynttessone de Manby. Allegation that the abbot shredded Moele's royal letters patent, assault, and imprisoned him. [2]

M1310 A: Malicious destruction of muniments that had been put in a house at Tynemouthe for safekeeping against the Scots. John de Whyteleye v. Brother Simon de Waldenne prior of Tynemouthe, Brother William de Waldenne co-monk, & Robert de Slykeburne chamberlain. [3]

M1314 A: Diversion of wine loaded in London for transport to Berwick upon Twede to support the king and his lieges in the war. [4]

M1316 A: John de Seleby v. John Honne de WestLinton and Thomas his son, John son of Robert and Alice his wife, William Bonde and Beatrice his wife, Thomas Godebarre, William le Chappeman & Margery his wife, Thomas de Cotun, Thomas Frere, John Frere and William his brother, Thomas son of Stephen, Thomas son of Nicholas and Idonea his wife, Adam le Bercher, William Angot and Matilda his wife, Walter son of Stephen, Richard Ailward, Alice la Mouner, Alice la Barun, John Scot, William son of Nicholas, Robert Drynge, William la Feure and William his son. Selby was commissioned to collect scutage from the knight's fees in Buckrose wapentake by reason of the archbishopric of York vacant for the king's armies in Scotland in the years of the reign of Edward I 28, 31, and 34. The defendants resisted. [5]

H1319 A: Emma wife of Richard Barri of Ripon, Alianora wife of Richard de Dalle, Margery wife of Richard Aldreth, Alice sister of Nicholas Bui de Lewys v. Nicholas le Teyntour, Anger Frere, William le Teyntour, William Lauberd, Alan fiz Ide chaplain, John Walker sr, John Soct jr, Richard Colstan, Peter de Malton, Richard le Seriaunt, Richard Berch, Nicholas Walsh, Stephen Wyles, Peter de Crakale, John Scot sr, John Scot bocher, Benedict Gille, Thomas de Westwyke, Richard le Dubbur, Roger de Carleton, Walter de Holgill, Hugh de Marton, Richard de Pontefract, John of the Halle, Adam Walker de Bondegate, and William Raskell. Plaintiffs sought remedy from the king because Ripon had agreed to pay the Scots not to destroy Ripon and had surrendered hostages to them for payment on a certain day. Ripon did not pay, so hostages remained imprisoned, and the women sought remedy against Ripon. [6]

H1319 B: Hostages for holding Berwick upon Tweed against the Scots. [7]


1325:

1350:

1375:

1400:

1425:

1450

1475:

1500:

1525:

1550:

1575:

1600:

1625:

1650:

1675: