Difference between revisions of "Trespassory Rape"

From Waalt
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{| border="5" cellspacing="5" cellpadding="2"
 
{| border="5" cellspacing="5" cellpadding="2"
 
| style="text-align: left;"|
 
| style="text-align: left;"|
 
 
   
 
   
  
  
 +
Trespassory rape is usually considered to be the husband's action against a man who run off with his wife.  Note that the wife is not co-plaintiff and there is no assertion that it was against her will.  The goods taken are usually clothing, household items, and jewelry.
 +
|-
  
 +
|
 +
[[Trespassory Rape 1300-1319]]
 +
|-
  
 
+
|
 
+
[[Trespassory Rape 1320-1339]]
 +
|-
  
 
|
 
|
Trespassory rape is usually considered to be the husband's action against a man who run off with his wife.  Note that the wife is not co-plaintiff and there is no assertion that it was against her will.  The goods taken are usually clothing, household items, and jewelry.
+
[[Trespassory Rape 1340-1344]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
  
 
|
 
|
[[Trespassory Rape 1300-1319]]
+
[[Trespassory Rape 1345-1349]]
 
|-
 
|-
  
 
|
 
|
[[Trespassory Rape 1320-1339]]
+
[[Trespassory Rape 1350-1354]]
 
|-
 
|-
  
 
|
 
|
[[Trespassory Rape 1340-1359]]
+
[[Trespassory Rape 1355-1359]]
 
|-
 
|-
  

Revision as of 16:35, 17 November 2012


Trespassory rape is usually considered to be the husband's action against a man who run off with his wife. Note that the wife is not co-plaintiff and there is no assertion that it was against her will. The goods taken are usually clothing, household items, and jewelry.

Trespassory Rape 1300-1319

Trespassory Rape 1320-1339

Trespassory Rape 1340-1344

Trespassory Rape 1345-1349

Trespassory Rape 1350-1354

Trespassory Rape 1355-1359

Trespassory Rape 1360-1379

Trespassory Rape 1380-1400