Difference between revisions of "STAC co Rutland"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
''' A '''  
 
''' A '''  
 
+
*
 
''' B '''  
 
''' B '''  
 
+
*
 
''' C '''  
 
''' C '''  
  
 
''' Cawdry v Bailey '''  
 
''' Cawdry v Bailey '''  
*Robert Cawdrey, parson of South Luffenham, Rutland v. William Bailie, Nicholas Mattocke, William Dant/Dante, John Bull, William Grimbold/Grymmalde, George Atton, Richard Tampion, James Taylour, John Jacklinge, Thomas Blackborne, Richard Mayles, John Atton, Bridgett Atton & Alyce Munton. Mowing of Rye sown on Glebe lands. (dk) STAC 5/C78/3
 
 
*STAC 5/C78/3 - B A - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Cawdry v William Baillie, Nicholas Mattoke et al
 
*STAC 5/C78/3 - B A - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Cawdry v William Baillie, Nicholas Mattoke et al
 +
**Robert Cawdrey, parson of South Luffenham, Rutland v. William Bailie, Nicholas Mattocke, William Dant/Dante, John Bull, William Grimbold/Grymmalde, George Atton, Richard Tampion, James Taylour, John Jacklinge, Thomas Blackborne, Richard Mayles, John Atton, Bridgett Atton & Alyce Munton. Mowing of Rye sown on Glebe lands. (dk) STAC 5/C78/3
 
*STAC 5/C80/40 - Rn - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Cawdrey v William Baylie, Nicholas Mattocke et al  
 
*STAC 5/C80/40 - Rn - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Cawdrey v William Baylie, Nicholas Mattocke et al  
 
*STAC 5/C28/36 - I D - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Cawdrey v William Baylye, Nicholas Mattocks, William Dante et al  
 
*STAC 5/C28/36 - I D - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Cawdrey v William Baylye, Nicholas Mattocks, William Dante et al  
*see also [[STAC Cawdry]]
+
**see also [[STAC Cawdry]]
  
 
''' D '''  
 
''' D '''  
  
 
''' Dunn v Wymark and Broughton '''   
 
''' Dunn v Wymark and Broughton '''   
*Interr refers suit Abell Dun v William Law at Rutland Assizes & interference with jury.(dk) - STAC 5/D19/19
 
 
*STAC 5/D32/10 - B A - 37 Eliz - Rutland - Abell Donne v Edward Wymerke, Richard Broughton, Robert Allen
 
*STAC 5/D32/10 - B A - 37 Eliz - Rutland - Abell Donne v Edward Wymerke, Richard Broughton, Robert Allen
 
*STAC 5/D29/27 - I D - 27 Eliz - Rutland - Abel Dunne v John Greene et al
 
*STAC 5/D29/27 - I D - 27 Eliz - Rutland - Abel Dunne v John Greene et al
Line 28: Line 27:
 
*STAC 5/D20/31 - I D - 37 Eliz - Rutland - Abell Dunn v Robert Ward, Richard Peck et al
 
*STAC 5/D20/31 - I D - 37 Eliz - Rutland - Abell Dunn v Robert Ward, Richard Peck et al
 
*STAC 5/D19/19 - I D - 37 Eliz - Rutland - Abel Dunn v Richard Broughton, John Presgrave, Thomas Lawe et al
 
*STAC 5/D19/19 - I D - 37 Eliz - Rutland - Abel Dunn v Richard Broughton, John Presgrave, Thomas Lawe et al
*see also [[STAC Donne]]
+
**Interr refers suit Abell Dun v William Law at Rutland Assizes & interference with jury.(dk) - STAC 5/D19/19
 +
**see also [[STAC Donne]]
  
 
''' E '''
 
''' E '''
 
+
*
 
''' F '''  
 
''' F '''  
  
 
''' Flower v Stevens '''
 
''' Flower v Stevens '''
*John Flower of Whitwell in the Co of Rutes. George Markw[hi]th of Normanton in the said Com’ of Rutes. STAC 5/F11/23
 
 
*STAC 5/F11/23 - B A - 20 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Jasper Coales et al.
 
*STAC 5/F11/23 - B A - 20 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Jasper Coales et al.
 +
**John Flower of Whitwell in the Co of Rutes. George Markw[hi]th of Normanton in the said Com’ of Rutes. STAC 5/F11/23
 
*STAC 5/F4/37 - I D - 21 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v Jasper Coles, John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al
 
*STAC 5/F4/37 - I D - 21 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v Jasper Coles, John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al
 
*STAC 5/F31/35 - Rn - - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al
 
*STAC 5/F31/35 - Rn - - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al
*see also [[STAC Flower]] for other possible references and see also [[STAC Fowler]]
+
**see also [[STAC Flower]]  
  
 
''' Fowler v Mackworth '''
 
''' Fowler v Mackworth '''
*John Fowler esquire of Whytwell, Rutland. re Land in Normanton, Rutland. STAC 5/F3/2
 
 
*STAC 5/F3/2 - B A - Hil 21 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v George Mackworth, Richard Fowler, Thomas Thorp, Francis Robinson.  
 
*STAC 5/F3/2 - B A - Hil 21 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v George Mackworth, Richard Fowler, Thomas Thorp, Francis Robinson.  
 +
**John Fowler esquire of Whytwell, Rutland. re Land in Normanton, Rutland. STAC 5/F3/2
 
*STAC 5/F2/26 - B A - 38 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v Arthur Player, Richard Breeme, Thomas Harverd, William Brown
 
*STAC 5/F2/26 - B A - 38 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v Arthur Player, Richard Breeme, Thomas Harverd, William Brown
 
*STAC 5/F6/20 - I D - 39 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v Anthony Player, Thomas Harforde et al
 
*STAC 5/F6/20 - I D - 39 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v Anthony Player, Thomas Harforde et al
 
*STAC 5/F11/40 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v Arthur Player, Thomas Hanford
 
*STAC 5/F11/40 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v Arthur Player, Thomas Hanford
*see also [[STAC Fowler]] and see also [[STAC Flower]]
+
**see also [[STAC Fowler]] and see also [[STAC Flower]]
  
 
''' G '''  
 
''' G '''  
 
+
*
 
''' H '''  
 
''' H '''  
  
 
''' Harrington v Jackson '''
 
''' Harrington v Jackson '''
*Interrogatories to be ministered to William Adderley, Robte Purye, Thomas Meares, Miles Jackson & Thomas Spenseley defts at the suit of Sir James Harrington complt, include: Did you bring, or cause to be brought, any action(s) against the complt for an escape supposed to be made by Richard Pecke out of the custody of the complt, being sheriff of Rutland. Interrogatories to be ministered to Richard Cony & Edmond Cony defts to suit of Sir James Harington complt, include: Did you about 28 or 29 Eliz recover £200 by judgement in Common Pleas against Richard Peck upon an action of debt. Deponent, 10 Feb Anno Anno 32 Eliz, Richard Cony of Kyrton Lincolnshire gentleman. Deponent, 26 Feb 32 Eliz, Thomas Spensley of St Mary ?Bowe, London scrivenor. Deponent, 18 Mar Anno 32 Eliz, William Adderley of Bow Lane, City of London merchant. Deponent, 27 Apr Anno 32 Eliz, Robert Purye of Bucklersbury, City of London grocer (dk) - STAC 5/H53/30
 
 
*STAC 5/H50/20 - B A - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Sir James Harrington v Miles Jackson, Robert Purye, Thomas Spensley  
 
*STAC 5/H50/20 - B A - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Sir James Harrington v Miles Jackson, Robert Purye, Thomas Spensley  
 
*STAC 5/H53/30 - I D - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Sir James Harrington v William Adderley
 
*STAC 5/H53/30 - I D - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Sir James Harrington v William Adderley
*See also [[STAC Harrington]]
+
**Interrogatories to be ministered to William Adderley, Robte Purye, Thomas Meares, Miles Jackson & Thomas Spenseley defts at the suit of Sir James Harrington complt, include: Did you bring, or cause to be brought, any action(s) against the complt for an escape supposed to be made by Richard Pecke out of the custody of the complt, being sheriff of Rutland. Interrogatories to be ministered to Richard Cony & Edmond Cony defts to suit of Sir James Harington complt, include: Did you about 28 or 29 Eliz recover £200 by judgement in Common Pleas against Richard Peck upon an action of debt. Deponent, 10 Feb Anno Anno 32 Eliz, Richard Cony of Kyrton Lincolnshire gentleman. Deponent, 26 Feb 32 Eliz, Thomas Spensley of St Mary ?Bowe, London scrivenor. Deponent, 18 Mar Anno 32 Eliz, William Adderley of Bow Lane, City of London merchant. Deponent, 27 Apr Anno 32 Eliz, Robert Purye of Bucklersbury, City of London grocer (dk) - STAC 5/H53/30
 +
**see also [[STAC Harrington]]
  
 
''' Hill v Waddington '''
 
''' Hill v Waddington '''
*Thomas Hill of Broome, Warks v John Waddington, Anne Waddington, Thomas Horseley & Henry Whetston all of Edith Weston, Rutland. Assault in Edith Weston, Rutland.(dk) STAC 5/H35/31
 
 
*STAC 5/H35/31 - B - 41 Eliz - Rutland - Thomas Hill v John Waddington et al
 
*STAC 5/H35/31 - B - 41 Eliz - Rutland - Thomas Hill v John Waddington et al
*see also [[STAC Hill]]
+
**Thomas Hill of Broome, Warks v John Waddington, Anne Waddington, Thomas Horseley & Henry Whetston all of Edith Weston, Rutland. Assault in Edith Weston, Rutland.(dk) STAC 5/H35/31
 +
**see also [[STAC Hill]]
  
 
''' I J '''  
 
''' I J '''  
 
+
*
 
''' K '''  
 
''' K '''  
 
+
*
 
''' L '''  
 
''' L '''  
 
+
*
 
''' M '''  
 
''' M '''  
  
 
''' Mackworth v Flower '''
 
''' Mackworth v Flower '''
*George Mackeworthe of Normanton co Rutland esq lawfully seized in his manor of Normanton. STAC 5/M1/30
 
 
*STAC 5/M1/30 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworthe v John Flower, Robert Armestronge, Richard Oute, Robert Wilkinson Hugh Tharpe et al  
 
*STAC 5/M1/30 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworthe v John Flower, Robert Armestronge, Richard Oute, Robert Wilkinson Hugh Tharpe et al  
 +
**George Mackeworthe of Normanton co Rutland esq lawfully seized in his manor of Normanton. STAC 5/M1/30
 
*STAC 5/M2/9 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworth v John Flower, Edward Roas, Marmaduke Glover, Robert Armstrong, Thomas Coye et al
 
*STAC 5/M2/9 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworth v John Flower, Edward Roas, Marmaduke Glover, Robert Armstrong, Thomas Coye et al
 
*STAC 5/M42/32 - I D - 20 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworth v John Flower, Matthew Norton
 
*STAC 5/M42/32 - I D - 20 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworth v John Flower, Matthew Norton
 
*STAC 5/M22/16 - I D - 19 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackeworthe v Edward Roas, Robert Armstrong et al
 
*STAC 5/M22/16 - I D - 19 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackeworthe v Edward Roas, Robert Armstrong et al
 
*STAC 5/M4/31 - B A - Hil21 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworthe v John Flower, John Dartnoll, William Smyth, Matthew Norton et al
 
*STAC 5/M4/31 - B A - Hil21 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworthe v John Flower, John Dartnoll, William Smyth, Matthew Norton et al
*see also [[STAC Mackworth]]
+
**see also [[STAC Mackworth]]
  
 
''' N '''  
 
''' N '''  
  
 
''' Noell v Harrington '''
 
''' Noell v Harrington '''
*See the Rutland constituency article in HOPT Vols 1604-29
 
*Exercise of the parliamentary writ delivered to him as sheriff. STAC 5/N1/32
 
 
*STAC 5/N1/32 - B A - Easter 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v Sir John Harrington, James Harrington, Sir William Bowlstredd, Richard Cony, George Butler, Edward Harbottell, Christofer Stacye, John Caldycott, Edward Roffe, Edward Chiselden, Edward Boothe, Robert Crofte, John Bodylie, Thomas Exton, Thomas Houghe alias Woodkeper, Edmond Ledgingham alias Lesringham Anthony B [  ], and John Campion
 
*STAC 5/N1/32 - B A - Easter 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v Sir John Harrington, James Harrington, Sir William Bowlstredd, Richard Cony, George Butler, Edward Harbottell, Christofer Stacye, John Caldycott, Edward Roffe, Edward Chiselden, Edward Boothe, Robert Crofte, John Bodylie, Thomas Exton, Thomas Houghe alias Woodkeper, Edmond Ledgingham alias Lesringham Anthony B [  ], and John Campion
 +
**Exercise of the parliamentary writ delivered to him as sheriff. STAC 5/N1/32
 
*STAC 5/N9/17 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v Richard Conye
 
*STAC 5/N9/17 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v Richard Conye
 
*STAC 5/N12/25 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v James Harryngton
 
*STAC 5/N12/25 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v James Harryngton
Line 93: Line 92:
 
*STAC 5/N10/35 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Nowell v Edward Chisleden, John Bodelye et al
 
*STAC 5/N10/35 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Nowell v Edward Chisleden, John Bodelye et al
 
*STAC 5/N6/11 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noells v Edward Harbottle, George Butler et al
 
*STAC 5/N6/11 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noells v Edward Harbottle, George Butler et al
*see also [[STAC Nowell]]
+
**See the Rutland constituency article in HOPT Vols 1604-29
 +
**see also [[STAC Nowell]]
  
 
''' O '''  
 
''' O '''  
 
+
*
 
''' P '''  
 
''' P '''  
  
 
''' Parsons v Heron '''
 
''' Parsons v Heron '''
*For a report of this case, see [[STAC 5/P24/17r]]
 
 
*STAC 5/P24/17 - B A - 36 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron
 
*STAC 5/P24/17 - B A - 36 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron
 +
**Case Book Report [[STAC 5/P24/17r]]
 
*STAC 5/P2/37 - A - 34 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Herron et al
 
*STAC 5/P2/37 - A - 34 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Herron et al
 
*STAC 5/P14/15 - I D - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron, Richard Slefford
 
*STAC 5/P14/15 - I D - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron, Richard Slefford
Line 115: Line 115:
 
*STAC 5/G3/9 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Richard Heron, Richard Slefford
 
*STAC 5/G3/9 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Richard Heron, Richard Slefford
 
*STAC 5/P64/27 - I D - 43 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron, Richard Slefford et al
 
*STAC 5/P64/27 - I D - 43 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron, Richard Slefford et al
*See also [[STAC Parsons]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Parsons]]  
  
 
''' Q '''  
 
''' Q '''  
 
+
*
 
''' R '''  
 
''' R '''  
 
+
*
 
''' S '''  
 
''' S '''  
 
+
*
 
''' T '''  
 
''' T '''  
 
+
*
 
''' UV '''  
 
''' UV '''  
 
+
*
 
''' W '''  
 
''' W '''  
 
+
*
 
''' XYZ '''  
 
''' XYZ '''  
  
Line 134: Line 134:
  
 
''' AG v Judkyn '''
 
''' AG v Judkyn '''
*Whereas Erasmus Cortysby? and Matthew Uffington were convicted of Coining and making false monies. STAC 5/A4/11
 
 
*STAC 5/A4/11 - B A - 24 Eliz - Rutland - AG v Thomas Judkyn, Baldwin Barker, William Cooke, Thomas Hunter, John Presgrave, Thomas Sculthorpe
 
*STAC 5/A4/11 - B A - 24 Eliz - Rutland - AG v Thomas Judkyn, Baldwin Barker, William Cooke, Thomas Hunter, John Presgrave, Thomas Sculthorpe
*see also [[STAC Judkin]]
+
**Whereas Erasmus Cortysby? and Matthew Uffington were convicted of Coining and making false monies. STAC 5/A4/11
 +
**see also [[STAC Judkin]]
 +
 
 
<BR>
 
<BR>
 
''' Palmer's cumulative totals of Star Chamber fines preserved in the E159s ''' (rp)
 
''' Palmer's cumulative totals of Star Chamber fines preserved in the E159s ''' (rp)

Latest revision as of 05:20, 18 June 2019

Rutland

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

A

B

C

Cawdry v Bailey

  • STAC 5/C78/3 - B A - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Cawdry v William Baillie, Nicholas Mattoke et al
    • Robert Cawdrey, parson of South Luffenham, Rutland v. William Bailie, Nicholas Mattocke, William Dant/Dante, John Bull, William Grimbold/Grymmalde, George Atton, Richard Tampion, James Taylour, John Jacklinge, Thomas Blackborne, Richard Mayles, John Atton, Bridgett Atton & Alyce Munton. Mowing of Rye sown on Glebe lands. (dk) STAC 5/C78/3
  • STAC 5/C80/40 - Rn - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Cawdrey v William Baylie, Nicholas Mattocke et al
  • STAC 5/C28/36 - I D - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Cawdrey v William Baylye, Nicholas Mattocks, William Dante et al

D

Dunn v Wymark and Broughton

  • STAC 5/D32/10 - B A - 37 Eliz - Rutland - Abell Donne v Edward Wymerke, Richard Broughton, Robert Allen
  • STAC 5/D29/27 - I D - 27 Eliz - Rutland - Abel Dunne v John Greene et al
  • STAC 5/D18/16 - I D - 37 Eliz - Rutland - Abell Dunn v Evererd Brittaine, Robert Rudkin, William Brown et al
  • STAC 5/D20/31 - I D - 37 Eliz - Rutland - Abell Dunn v Robert Ward, Richard Peck et al
  • STAC 5/D19/19 - I D - 37 Eliz - Rutland - Abel Dunn v Richard Broughton, John Presgrave, Thomas Lawe et al
    • Interr refers suit Abell Dun v William Law at Rutland Assizes & interference with jury.(dk) - STAC 5/D19/19
    • see also STAC Donne

E

F

Flower v Stevens

  • STAC 5/F11/23 - B A - 20 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Jasper Coales et al.
    • John Flower of Whitwell in the Co of Rutes. George Markw[hi]th of Normanton in the said Com’ of Rutes. STAC 5/F11/23
  • STAC 5/F4/37 - I D - 21 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v Jasper Coles, John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al
  • STAC 5/F31/35 - Rn - - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al

Fowler v Mackworth

  • STAC 5/F3/2 - B A - Hil 21 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v George Mackworth, Richard Fowler, Thomas Thorp, Francis Robinson.
    • John Fowler esquire of Whytwell, Rutland. re Land in Normanton, Rutland. STAC 5/F3/2
  • STAC 5/F2/26 - B A - 38 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v Arthur Player, Richard Breeme, Thomas Harverd, William Brown
  • STAC 5/F6/20 - I D - 39 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v Anthony Player, Thomas Harforde et al
  • STAC 5/F11/40 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v Arthur Player, Thomas Hanford

G

H

Harrington v Jackson

  • STAC 5/H50/20 - B A - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Sir James Harrington v Miles Jackson, Robert Purye, Thomas Spensley
  • STAC 5/H53/30 - I D - 32 Eliz - Rutland - Sir James Harrington v William Adderley
    • Interrogatories to be ministered to William Adderley, Robte Purye, Thomas Meares, Miles Jackson & Thomas Spenseley defts at the suit of Sir James Harrington complt, include: Did you bring, or cause to be brought, any action(s) against the complt for an escape supposed to be made by Richard Pecke out of the custody of the complt, being sheriff of Rutland. Interrogatories to be ministered to Richard Cony & Edmond Cony defts to suit of Sir James Harington complt, include: Did you about 28 or 29 Eliz recover £200 by judgement in Common Pleas against Richard Peck upon an action of debt. Deponent, 10 Feb Anno Anno 32 Eliz, Richard Cony of Kyrton Lincolnshire gentleman. Deponent, 26 Feb 32 Eliz, Thomas Spensley of St Mary ?Bowe, London scrivenor. Deponent, 18 Mar Anno 32 Eliz, William Adderley of Bow Lane, City of London merchant. Deponent, 27 Apr Anno 32 Eliz, Robert Purye of Bucklersbury, City of London grocer (dk) - STAC 5/H53/30
    • see also STAC Harrington

Hill v Waddington

  • STAC 5/H35/31 - B - 41 Eliz - Rutland - Thomas Hill v John Waddington et al
    • Thomas Hill of Broome, Warks v John Waddington, Anne Waddington, Thomas Horseley & Henry Whetston all of Edith Weston, Rutland. Assault in Edith Weston, Rutland.(dk) STAC 5/H35/31
    • see also STAC Hill

I J

K

L

M

Mackworth v Flower

  • STAC 5/M1/30 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworthe v John Flower, Robert Armestronge, Richard Oute, Robert Wilkinson Hugh Tharpe et al
    • George Mackeworthe of Normanton co Rutland esq lawfully seized in his manor of Normanton. STAC 5/M1/30
  • STAC 5/M2/9 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworth v John Flower, Edward Roas, Marmaduke Glover, Robert Armstrong, Thomas Coye et al
  • STAC 5/M42/32 - I D - 20 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworth v John Flower, Matthew Norton
  • STAC 5/M22/16 - I D - 19 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackeworthe v Edward Roas, Robert Armstrong et al
  • STAC 5/M4/31 - B A - Hil21 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworthe v John Flower, John Dartnoll, William Smyth, Matthew Norton et al

N

Noell v Harrington

  • STAC 5/N1/32 - B A - Easter 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v Sir John Harrington, James Harrington, Sir William Bowlstredd, Richard Cony, George Butler, Edward Harbottell, Christofer Stacye, John Caldycott, Edward Roffe, Edward Chiselden, Edward Boothe, Robert Crofte, John Bodylie, Thomas Exton, Thomas Houghe alias Woodkeper, Edmond Ledgingham alias Lesringham Anthony B [ ], and John Campion
    • Exercise of the parliamentary writ delivered to him as sheriff. STAC 5/N1/32
  • STAC 5/N9/17 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v Richard Conye
  • STAC 5/N12/25 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v James Harryngton
  • STAC 5/N2/26 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v Sir John Harrington
  • STAC 5/N13/40 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v Sir William Boulstred
  • STAC 5/N10/35 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Nowell v Edward Chisleden, John Bodelye et al
  • STAC 5/N6/11 - I D - 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noells v Edward Harbottle, George Butler et al
    • See the Rutland constituency article in HOPT Vols 1604-29
    • see also STAC Nowell

O

P

Parsons v Heron

  • STAC 5/P24/17 - B A - 36 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron
  • STAC 5/P2/37 - A - 34 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Herron et al
  • STAC 5/P14/15 - I D - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron, Richard Slefford
  • STAC 5/P7/20 - I D - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v John Nicholas et al
  • STAC 5/P41/19 - I D - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron, Richard Slesford
  • STAC 5/P8/38 - I D - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Herron
  • STAC 5/P40/4 - I D - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron, Richard Slefford
  • STAC 5/P31/13 - I D - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron
  • STAC 5/P21/24 - I D - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron, Richard Slefford et al
  • STAC 5/P67/21 - I D - 35 Eliz - Rutland -[blank] Parsons v Edward Heron, Richard Sleiford
  • STAC 5/P57/32 - A - 34 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Richard Stesford et al
  • STAC 5/P64/33 - I D - 34 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Richard Sleford
  • STAC 5/G3/9 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Richard Heron, Richard Slefford
  • STAC 5/P64/27 - I D - 43 Eliz - Rutland - Robert Parsons v Edward Heron, Richard Slefford et al

Q

R

S

T

UV

W

XYZ

Attorney General

AG v Judkyn

  • STAC 5/A4/11 - B A - 24 Eliz - Rutland - AG v Thomas Judkyn, Baldwin Barker, William Cooke, Thomas Hunter, John Presgrave, Thomas Sculthorpe
    • Whereas Erasmus Cortysby? and Matthew Uffington were convicted of Coining and making false monies. STAC 5/A4/11
    • see also STAC Judkin


Palmer's cumulative totals of Star Chamber fines preserved in the E159s (rp)

  • TNA E159/416 Michaelmas Term, 40-41 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1598
    • From Stephen Coe de Ordsall, Notts, cleric: £10.
    • From Anna Mackworth de Empingham, Rutl: £10.
    • From Richard Thurgar de Linton, Cambs: £10.