Difference between revisions of "STAC co Rutland"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''' Rutland '''  
 
''' Rutland '''  
 +
 +
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
  
 
''' A '''  
 
''' A '''  
Line 11: Line 13:
 
''' E '''
 
''' E '''
 
*
 
*
''' F '''
 
 
 
''' Flower v Stevens '''
 
''' Flower v Stevens '''
 
*John Flower of Whitwell in the Co of Rutes. George Markw[hi]th of Normanton in the said Com’ of Rutes. STAC 5/F11/23  
 
*John Flower of Whitwell in the Co of Rutes. George Markw[hi]th of Normanton in the said Com’ of Rutes. STAC 5/F11/23  
Line 27: Line 27:
 
*STAC 5/F11/40 - Rn - 40 Eliz - John Fowler v Arthur Player, Thomas Hanford
 
*STAC 5/F11/40 - Rn - 40 Eliz - John Fowler v Arthur Player, Thomas Hanford
 
*see also [[STAC Fowler]] and see also [[STAC Flower]]
 
*see also [[STAC Fowler]] and see also [[STAC Flower]]
 
+
*
 
''' G '''  
 
''' G '''  
 
*
 
*
Line 38: Line 38:
 
''' L '''  
 
''' L '''  
 
*
 
*
''' M '''  
+
''' Mackworth v Flower '''
*
+
*George Mackeworthe of Normanton co Rutland esq lawfully seized in his manor of Normanton. STAC 5/M1/30
''' N '''  
+
*STAC 5/M1/30 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworthe v John Flower, Robert Armestronge, Richard Oute, Robert Wilkinson Hugh Tharpe et al
 +
*STAC 5/M2/9 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - George Mackworth v John Flower, Edward Roas, Marmaduke Glover, Robert Armstrong, Thomas Coye et al
 +
*STAC 5/M42/32 - I D - 20 Eliz - George Mackworth v John Flower, Matthew Norton
 +
*STAC 5/M22/16 - I D - 19 Eliz - George Mackeworthe v Edward Roas, Robert Armstrong et al
 +
*STAC 5/M4/31 - B A - Hil21 Eliz - George Mackworthe v John Flower, John Dartnoll, William Smyth, Matthew Norton et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Mackworth]]
 +
 
 +
''' Noell v Harrington '''
 +
*See the Rutland constituency article in HOPT Vols 1604-29
 +
*Exercise of the parliamentary writ delivered to him as sheriff. STAC 5/N1/32
 +
*STAC 5/N1/32 - B A - Easter 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v Sir John Harrington, James Harrington, Sir William Bowlstredd, Richard Cony, George Butler, Edward Harbottell, Christofer Stacye, John Caldycott, Edward Roffe, Edward Chiselden, Edward Boothe, Robert Crofte, John Bodylie, Thomas Exton, Thomas Houghe alias Woodkeper, Edmond Ledgingham alias Lesringham Anthony B [  ], and John Campion
 +
*STAC 5/N9/17 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Noell v Richard Conye
 +
*STAC 5/N12/25 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Noell v James Harryngton
 +
*STAC 5/N2/26 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Noell v Sir John Harrington
 +
*STAC 5/N13/40 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Noell v Sir William Boulstred
 +
*STAC 5/N10/35 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Nowell v Edward Chisleden, John Bodelye et al
 +
*STAC 5/N6/11 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Noells v Edward Harbottle, George Butler et al
 
*see also [[STAC Nowell]]
 
*see also [[STAC Nowell]]
 +
*
 
''' O '''  
 
''' O '''  
 
*
 
*
Line 58: Line 75:
 
''' W '''  
 
''' W '''  
 
*
 
*
''' X '''
+
''' XYZ '''  
*
+
''' Y '''
+
*
+
''' Z '''  
+
 
*
 
*
 +
''' Attorney General '''
 +
 +
''' AG v Judkyn '''
 +
*Whereas Erasmus Cortysby? and Matthew Uffington were convicted of Coining and making false monies. STAC 5/A4/11
 +
*STAC 5/A4/11 - B A - 24 Eliz - Rutland - AG v Thomas Judkyn, Baldwin Barker, William Cooke, Thomas Hunter, John Presgrave, Thomas Sculthorpe
 +
*see also [[STAC Judkin]]

Revision as of 13:17, 7 February 2016

Rutland

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

A

B

C

D

E

Flower v Stevens

  • John Flower of Whitwell in the Co of Rutes. George Markw[hi]th of Normanton in the said Com’ of Rutes. STAC 5/F11/23
  • STAC 5/F11/23 - B A - 20 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Jasper Coales et al.
  • STAC 5/F4/37 - I D - 21 Eliz - Rutland - John Flower v Jasper Coles, John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al
  • STAC 5/F31/35 - Rn - - Rutland - John Flower v John Stevens, Thomas Burnby et al
  • see also STAC Flower for other possible references and see also STAC Fowler

Fowler v Mackworth

  • John Fowler esquire of Whytwell, Rutland. re Land in Normanton, Rutland. STAC 5/F3/2
  • STAC 5/F3/2 - B A - Hil 21 Eliz - Rutland - John Fowler v George Mackworth, Richard Fowler, Thomas Thorp, Francis Robinson.
  • STAC 5/F2/26 - B A - 38 Eliz - John Fowler v Arthur Player, Richard Breeme, Thomas Harverd, William Brown
  • STAC 5/F6/20 - I D - 39 Eliz - John Fowler v Anthony Player, Thomas Harforde et al
  • STAC 5/F11/40 - Rn - 40 Eliz - John Fowler v Arthur Player, Thomas Hanford
  • see also STAC Fowler and see also STAC Flower

G

H

IJ

K

L

Mackworth v Flower

  • George Mackeworthe of Normanton co Rutland esq lawfully seized in his manor of Normanton. STAC 5/M1/30
  • STAC 5/M1/30 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Rutland - George Mackworthe v John Flower, Robert Armestronge, Richard Oute, Robert Wilkinson Hugh Tharpe et al
  • STAC 5/M2/9 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - George Mackworth v John Flower, Edward Roas, Marmaduke Glover, Robert Armstrong, Thomas Coye et al
  • STAC 5/M42/32 - I D - 20 Eliz - George Mackworth v John Flower, Matthew Norton
  • STAC 5/M22/16 - I D - 19 Eliz - George Mackeworthe v Edward Roas, Robert Armstrong et al
  • STAC 5/M4/31 - B A - Hil21 Eliz - George Mackworthe v John Flower, John Dartnoll, William Smyth, Matthew Norton et al
  • see also STAC Mackworth

Noell v Harrington

  • See the Rutland constituency article in HOPT Vols 1604-29
  • Exercise of the parliamentary writ delivered to him as sheriff. STAC 5/N1/32
  • STAC 5/N1/32 - B A - Easter 44 Eliz - Rutland - Sir Andrew Noell v Sir John Harrington, James Harrington, Sir William Bowlstredd, Richard Cony, George Butler, Edward Harbottell, Christofer Stacye, John Caldycott, Edward Roffe, Edward Chiselden, Edward Boothe, Robert Crofte, John Bodylie, Thomas Exton, Thomas Houghe alias Woodkeper, Edmond Ledgingham alias Lesringham Anthony B [ ], and John Campion
  • STAC 5/N9/17 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Noell v Richard Conye
  • STAC 5/N12/25 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Noell v James Harryngton
  • STAC 5/N2/26 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Noell v Sir John Harrington
  • STAC 5/N13/40 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Noell v Sir William Boulstred
  • STAC 5/N10/35 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Nowell v Edward Chisleden, John Bodelye et al
  • STAC 5/N6/11 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Andrew Noells v Edward Harbottle, George Butler et al
  • see also STAC Nowell

O

P

Q

R

S

T

UV

W

XYZ

Attorney General

AG v Judkyn

  • Whereas Erasmus Cortysby? and Matthew Uffington were convicted of Coining and making false monies. STAC 5/A4/11
  • STAC 5/A4/11 - B A - 24 Eliz - Rutland - AG v Thomas Judkyn, Baldwin Barker, William Cooke, Thomas Hunter, John Presgrave, Thomas Sculthorpe
  • see also STAC Judkin