Difference between revisions of "STAC co Norfolk"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''' Norfolk '''  
 
''' Norfolk '''  
  
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
+
''' NOTA BENE ''' - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.  
 +
 
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
 
 +
''' A '''
  
 
''' Aldham v Harvey '''  
 
''' Aldham v Harvey '''  
*Wramplingham co Norfolk. STAC 5/A4/17
 
 
*STAC 5/A4/17 - B A - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Aldham v John Harvye, Anthony Bennyt, Thomas Hallyet et al
 
*STAC 5/A4/17 - B A - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Aldham v John Harvye, Anthony Bennyt, Thomas Hallyet et al
*STAC 5/A16 /11 - I D - 24 Eliz - Henry Aldehn v John Harvy
+
**Wramplingham co Norfolk.
*see also [[STAC Aldham]]
+
*STAC 5/A16 /11 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Aldehn v John Harvy
 +
**see also [[STAC Aldham]]
  
 
''' Allen v Playford '''
 
''' Allen v Playford '''
*Thomas Aleyn of Northrepps co Norfolk. STAC 5/A52/8
 
 
*STAC 5/A52/8 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allen v Henry Playford et al  
 
*STAC 5/A52/8 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allen v Henry Playford et al  
 +
**Thomas Aleyn of Northrepps co Norfolk.
 
*STAC 5/A7/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Aleyn v Henry Playforth et al, John Atkyns, William Perker et al
 
*STAC 5/A7/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Aleyn v Henry Playforth et al, John Atkyns, William Perker et al
*see also [[STAC Allen]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Allen]]  
  
 
''' Allyson v Richman '''
 
''' Allyson v Richman '''
*Thomas Alyson of Aylesham co Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/2
 
 
*STAC 5/A2/2 - B Dr - Easter 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allyson v Thomas Richman, George Thomson
 
*STAC 5/A2/2 - B Dr - Easter 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allyson v Thomas Richman, George Thomson
*see also [[STAC Allyson]]  
+
**Thomas Alyson of Aylesham co Norfolk.
 +
**see also [[STAC Allyson]]  
  
 
''' Anguish v Nicholas '''
 
''' Anguish v Nicholas '''
*Walsingham in the co of Norfolk. STAC 5/A1/30
 
 
*STAC 5/A47/8 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Eme Angwishe v Agnes Nicholas, John Rame et al
 
*STAC 5/A47/8 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Eme Angwishe v Agnes Nicholas, John Rame et al
 
*STAC 5/A53/14 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v Agnes Nicholas, Rame, John Craddock et al
 
*STAC 5/A53/14 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v Agnes Nicholas, Rame, John Craddock et al
 
*STAC 5/A1/30 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v William Nicholas
 
*STAC 5/A1/30 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v William Nicholas
 +
**Walsingham in the co of Norfolk.
 
*STAC 5/A20 /2 - Rr - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Angus v Anne Nicholas, William Nicholas et al
 
*STAC 5/A20 /2 - Rr - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Angus v Anne Nicholas, William Nicholas et al
*see also [[STAC Anguish]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Anguish]]  
  
 
''' Armiger v Whitney '''  
 
''' Armiger v Whitney '''  
*Possibly Burnham and [King's] Lynne, Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/4
+
*STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
*STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
+
*Robert Whitney a man of evil and lewd life and conversation - STAC 5/A2/4
*STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al
+
**Possibly Burnham and [King's] Lynne, Norfolk. [http://wiki.whitneygen.org/wrg/index.php/Archive:STAC_5/A2/4 (See Note] which also suggests that STAC 5/A26/29 is related).
*see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
+
*STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
  
 
''' Armiger v Barber '''
 
''' Armiger v Barber '''
*William Arminger the elder of North Creake in Norfolk gentleman. In re the manor of Hillham in Holkham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A3/26
 
 
*STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al  
 
*STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al  
*STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - - William Armiger v John Barber et al
+
**William Arminger the elder of North Creake in Norfolk gentleman. In re the manor of Hillham in Holkham, Norfolk.
*STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
+
*STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v John Barber et al
*STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al
+
*STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
*see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
+
*STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
  
 
''' Artis v Ashill '''  
 
''' Artis v Ashill '''  
*John Ashill clerk def parson of Bodney co Norfolk. STAC 5/A6/24
+
*STAC 5/A16/18 - B A Rn I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Antys v John Ashyll et al
*STAC 5/A16/18 - B A Rn I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Antys v John Ashyll et al
+
 
*STAC 5/A6/24 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill
 
*STAC 5/A6/24 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill
*STAC 5/A43/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
+
**John Ashill clerk def parson of Bodney co Norfolk.
*STAC 5/A24/4 - I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
+
*STAC 5/A43/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
*STAC 5/A42/19 - I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Artis v Robert Purdye, John Ashill
+
*STAC 5/A24/4 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
*see also [[STAC Artis]]
+
*STAC 5/A42/19 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artis v Robert Purdye, John Ashill
 +
**see also [[STAC Artis]]
 +
 
 +
''' Aslack v Stone '''
 +
*STAC 5/A9/25 - I D - 1 Eliz - Norfolk - William Aslake v Richard Stone, Richard Rightwise et al
 +
*STAC 5/A9/25 - Destruction of a dyke on Holkham manor
 +
**see also [[STAC co Norfolk]]
 +
 
 +
''' B '''
 +
 
 +
''' Bacon v Ryall '''
 +
*STAC 5/B26/27 - B A - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - William Bacon, Elizabeth Bacon v William Ryall, John Dod
 +
**Defamation; Subornation (cm)
 +
**see also [[STAC Bacon]]
 +
 
 +
''' Baker v Prest '''
 +
*STAC 7/1/35 - B - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Baker v Robert Preste
 +
**A a scrap of Bill dated in verso Anno 27 Eliz
 +
**TNA Note: Rent of land in Walton granted by Sir Thomas Gresham - STAC 7/1/35
 +
**see also [[STAC Baker]]
  
 
''' Baldrey v Ward '''  
 
''' Baldrey v Ward '''  
*Theft of crop of peas. Rednall, Norfolk. John Baldrye v Thomas Warde of Rednall, tanner & Margery his wife; Anne Myddaye of Rednall, spinster; John Lawne & Wyllm Palmer of Southreps, yeoman. STAC/B67/4
 
 
*STAC 5/B67/4 - B - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - John Baldrye v Margaret Warde,Thomas Warde, William Palmer
 
*STAC 5/B67/4 - B - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - John Baldrye v Margaret Warde,Thomas Warde, William Palmer
*see also [[STAC Baldrey]]  
+
**Theft of crop of peas. Rednall, Norfolk. John Baldrye v Thomas Warde of Rednall, tanner & Margery his wife; Anne Myddaye of Rednall, spinster; John Lawne & Wyllm Palmer of Southreps, yeoman.
 +
**see also [[STAC Baldrey]]
 +
 
 +
''' Barham v Roberts '''
 +
*STAC 5/B21/37 - B A - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Burham v John Roberts, Thomas Sewell et al
 +
**Thomas Burham of Foulden, Norfolk. Perjury at Norfolk Assizes. Action of trespass at Common Pleas. Lands in Foulden.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/B95/18 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Burham v William Olyver, John Roberts et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Barham]]
 +
 
 +
''' Barwick v Lovell '''
 +
*STAC 5/B7/36 - B A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwick v Philip Lovell et uxor, Elizabeth alias Great Bess his maid
 +
*STAC 5/B6/30 - B A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - William Berwick v Philip Lovell, Richard Costen
 +
*STAC 5/B103/30 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwick v Robert Costen
 +
*STAC 5/B97/40 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwicke v Philip Lovell et al
 +
*STAC 5/B2/16 - B A C I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Wiliiam Barwicke v Philip Lovell
 +
**Earlier that decade [1590s], a widow from Garboldisham (Norfolk) who was threatened with a subpoena, said ‘that before she wold testifie anie thinge eyter against [a local gentleman] or anie that belonged unto him, she wold be torne in peces [by] wyld horses’. STAC 5/B2/16, Thomas Barwick (deposition). Hillary Taylor, The price of the poor’s words: social relations and the economics of deposing for one’s ‘betters’ in early modern England., Economic History Review (2018) https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12773
 +
**A Norfolk gentleman who deposed for the complainant (also a gentleman) claimed that Elizabeth Costens had approached him and voluntarily confessed that she had ‘forsworne herselfe against [the complainant]’, before adding that she had been ‘drawne and persuaded soe to doe by . . . hir mistris’. - STAC 5/B2/16, Edward Barwick (deposition). Costen’s case suggests that there could be a gendered pressure involved in subornation: Costen herself was approached about testifying by her mistress, Mrs Lovell, and her husband was approached by Mr Lovell. However, the evidence does not permit a more thoroughgoing exploration of this issue. Hillary Taylor, The price of the poor’s words: social relations and the economics of deposing for one’s ‘betters’ in early modern England., Economic History Review (2018) https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12773
 +
*STAC 5/B18/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwicke v Philip Lovell
 +
*STAC 5/B55/40 - B A Dr C - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwick v Hellen Lovell, Elizabeth Coster
 +
*STAC 5/B80/18 - C I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwicke v Elizabeth Costen
 +
*STAC 5/B57/30 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwicke v Robert Costen
 +
*STAC 5/C51/10 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwicke v Philip Lovell
 +
**see also [[STAC Barwick]]
 +
 
 +
''' Baxter v Egmere '''
 +
*STAC 5/B35/40 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v John Egmere alias Poley
 +
*STAC 5/B18/19 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v John Eggmor alias Pollye
 +
*STAC 5/B3/5  - B A Rn - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v Thomas Elgood, John Poller alias Egmere et al
 +
*STAC 5/B37/7 - C I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v Thomas Ellgood, John Egmer alias Poley
 +
*STAC 5/B82/3 - I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v John Buckenham, Thomas Elgood
 +
*STAC 5/B26/26 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v Thomas Elgood
 +
**official malfeasance (of a bailiff of Earsham, charged with having coutnerfeited Edward Coke's seal) (cm)
 +
*STAC 5/B35/11 - A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v Thomas Elgood, John Buckenham
 +
**see [[STAC co Norfolk]]  
  
 
''' Becker v Neave '''
 
''' Becker v Neave '''
*Norfolk. Interrogatories to be administered on behalf of Roose Becker complt against Wyllm Neale . . . Thomas Bretton, Thomas Neale, Thomas Becker & Elinor his wife, Thomas Wyth.., John Alyson, Rauffe Symes & Edmund Crell.. defts. Complt is widow of Wyllm Becker of ?Suttyngton?, Norfolk. STAC 5/B67/18
+
*STAC 5/B7/12 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Rose Becker v William Neve, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Becker et al
*STAC 5/B7/12 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - - Rose Becker v William Neve, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Becker et al
+
 
*STAC 5/B67/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Roose Becker v Thomas Neave, William Neave, Thomas Bretton
 
*STAC 5/B67/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Roose Becker v Thomas Neave, William Neave, Thomas Bretton
*see also [[STAC Becker]]  
+
**Norfolk. Interrogatories to be administered on behalf of Roose Becker complt against Wyllm Neale . . . Thomas Bretton, Thomas Neale, Thomas Becker & Elinor his wife, Thomas Wyth.., John Alyson, Rauffe Symes & Edmund Crell.. defts. Complt is widow of Wyllm Becker of ?Suttyngton?, Norfolk. STAC 5/B67/18
 +
**see also [[STAC Becker]]  
  
 
''' Beckham v Halman and Crane '''
 
''' Beckham v Halman and Crane '''
*Fronsham, Norfolk. Refers to writ of ravishment of ward from High Court of Chancery directed to the Shreve of Norfolk against the brothers Richard & Henrye Beckham, and a suit tried at Norwich Assizes by Robert Crane against Richard & Henrye Beckham concerning the wardship of Sara Futter, only daughter & heir of Rycharde Futter. Mention also of the death of Alice Futter, mother of Sara Futter. STAC 5/B68/2
 
 
*STAC 5/B68/2 - B A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v [blank] Halman, Elizabeth Paynter et al
 
*STAC 5/B68/2 - B A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v [blank] Halman, Elizabeth Paynter et al
 
**Bill of Richard Beckham of Little Frannsham, Norfolk. Defts Edmund Halman, Thomas Halman, John Halman, Robert Crane, Elizabeth Paynter.  
 
**Bill of Richard Beckham of Little Frannsham, Norfolk. Defts Edmund Halman, Thomas Halman, John Halman, Robert Crane, Elizabeth Paynter.  
 
**Answers of Isabell (otherwise Elizabeth) Paynter widow to the bill of complaint of Richard Beckham.  
 
**Answers of Isabell (otherwise Elizabeth) Paynter widow to the bill of complaint of Richard Beckham.  
 
**Answers of Robarte Crane, Edmunde Halman, John Halman & Thomas Halman
 
**Answers of Robarte Crane, Edmunde Halman, John Halman & Thomas Halman
*STAC 5/B99/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v John Halman, Thomas Halrnan
+
**Fronsham, Norfolk. Refers to writ of ravishment of ward from High Court of Chancery directed to the Shreve of Norfolk against the brothers Richard & Henrye Beckham, and a suit tried at Norwich Assizes by Robert Crane against Richard & Henrye Beckham concerning the wardship of Sara Futter, only daughter & heir of Rycharde Futter. Mention also of the death of Alice Futter, mother of Sara Futter.
*STAC 5/B16/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
+
*STAC 5/B99/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v John Halman, Thomas Halrnan
*STAC 5/B103/9 - Rn - 34 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane, Edmund Halman et al
+
*STAC 5/B16/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
*STAC 7/18/23 - - - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
+
*STAC 5/B103/9 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane, Edmund Halman et al
*see also [[STAC Beckham]]  
+
*STAC 7/18/23 - - - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
 +
**see also [[STAC Beckham]]  
  
''' Blenerhasset v Sayers '''
+
''' Bexwell v Gurney '''
*STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
+
*STAC 5/B26/24 - B A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Rose Bexwell v George Gurney, William Isbells
*STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
+
**forged deed (cm)
*STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
+
*STAC 5/B13/4 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Rose Bexwell v William Isbells
*STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
+
*STAC 5/B14/17 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Rose Bexwell v George Gurney
*STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
+
**see also [[STAC Bexwell]]
*see also [[STAC Blenerhasset]]  
+
 
 +
''' Bigott v Gaudy'''
 +
*STAC 5/B4/1 - B A - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Wiliiam Bigott v Thomas Gaudy, John Bachecrost, John Coppyng Jr, Stephen Gorney, Henry Estarve et al
 +
**William Bigott of Sterston, Norfolk. Manor of Beckhall in Sterston.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/B79/24 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - William Bygott v Thomas Gawdy
 +
*STAC 5/B24/13 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - William Biggott v John Coppinge
 +
*STAC 5/B75/16 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - William Bygot v Stephen Burney, Henry Carter
 +
**see also [[STAC Biggott]]
 +
 
 +
''' Blenerhasset v Manser '''
 +
*STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
 +
**Norfolk. Estate of Thomas Pepis/Pepes.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
 +
*STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
 +
*STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
 +
*STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
 +
**Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 13v. Examinations to impertinent interrogatories not to be given in evidence nor to be of force. William Blenhasset, armiger, plaintiff; Richard Munster, defendant: the court ordered that the defendant’s examinations to impertinent interrogatories not to be given in evidence at any trial or to be of force.Hillary 26 Elizabeth (kk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Blenerhasset]]
 +
 
 +
''' Blowfield v Gryme '''
 +
*STAC 5/B7/17 - B Dr - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - John Blowfield v William Gryme, John Ransome, Philip Bocking, Clement Herward, John Matchet et al
 +
*STAC 5/B2/1  - B A Dr Rn Rr - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - John Bloufyld v Thomas Gryme, Thomas Greene, Nicholas Hymore
 +
*STAC 5/B28/16 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - John Blowfield v Robert Younger, Thomas Grene
 +
*STAC 5/B94/30 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - John Blofyld v Thomas Gryme, Richard Gryme, Thomas Crew et al
 +
*STAC 5/B86/16 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - John Blowfield v Thomas Gryme, Richard Gryme, Nicholas Heames
 +
*STAC 5/B53/20 - B - - Norfolk - [blank] Bloufield v William Gryme, Thomas Green
 +
*STAC 5/B33/1 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Blowfyld v Thomas Gryme, Thomas Green, Richard Green et al
 +
*STAC 5/B63/36 - C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Peter Blofelde v Thomas Gryeme, Richard Gryeme, Nickelas Hayward
 +
**Interrs refer to the assizes at Thetford & Norwich. Deponent from Norfolk.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Blowfield]]
 +
 
 +
''' Body v Snell '''
 +
*STAC 5/B31/8 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Body v Charles Snell, James Hargrave
 +
**Edward Body Citizen & Clothworker of London v Charles Snell & James Hargrave. Perjury. Trial of Edward Body v Peter Cartwright late mayor of Line. Deponents are of Lyn Regis, Norfolk.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Body]]
 +
 
 +
''' Bolton v Alpe '''
 +
*STAC 5/B26/30 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Boulton v Edward Alpe, William Fiske et al
 +
**forged deeds (cm)
 +
*STAC 5/B29/5 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Boulton v John Appe
 +
*STAC 5/B30/39 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Boulton v William Alpe, William Fiske et al
 +
*STAC 5/B49/23 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Bolton v Edward Alpe et al
 +
*STAC 5/B34/40 - A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Bolton v John Fyske et al
 +
*STAC 5/B31/39 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Boulton v John Fyske et al
 +
*STAC 5/B64/7 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Bowles v Edward Alpe
 +
**see also [[STAC Bolton]]
 +
 
 +
''' Breadstreet v Tendall '''
 +
•STAC 7/1/33 - B A I D Rn - Mich 25/26 Eliz - Norfolk - Humphrey Brastret v John Tendall alias Kendall
 +
**TNA Note: Norwich: Procuring false testimony in a lawsuit for copyhold in the manors of Hockhams and Banham
 +
**Humphrey Brastret of Gislington co Norfolk yeoman. Repilcation dated Mich 25/26
 +
**see also [[STAC Breadstreet]]
 +
 
 +
''' Butler v Leverton '''
 +
*STAC 5/B1/31 - B A - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - John Butler v Cuthbert Leverton
 +
**John Butler of Catton co Norfolk yeoman. Cuthbert Leverton of Worsted [Worstead] co Norfolk gentleman owed Butler 200 marks to be paid in instalments at the south porch of Catton church
 +
*STAC 5/B14/5 - I D - 16 Eliz - Norfolk - John Butler v Cuthbert Leverton
 +
**see also [[STAC Butler]]
 +
 
 +
''' Byles v Google '''
 +
*STAC 5/B26/18 - B A - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Biles v Robert Google, William Lindsey et al
 +
**forceable entry; assault (cm)
 +
*STAC 5/B88/18 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Byles v Robert Google, William Lynsey
 +
**see also [[STAC Bill]]
 +
 
 +
''' C '''
 +
 
 +
''' Chabenor v Canon '''
 +
*STAC 5/C71/32 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Chabenor v Robert Cannon
 +
*STAC 7/2/8 - - - Norfolk - Robert Chabener v Robert Canon, Avery Canon
 +
**TNA Note: Perjury in a suit for right of way at Swaffham Market
 +
**see also [[STAC Chabenor]]
 +
 
 +
''' Clarke v Hope '''
 +
*STAC 5/C20/21 - B A - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Mathew Clarke v Francis Hopes, John Robinson
 +
*STAC 5/C24/38 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Mathew Clerke v Francis Hope, John Robinson
 +
**see also [[STAC Clark]]
  
 
''' Cobbe v Hunt '''  
 
''' Cobbe v Hunt '''  
*In re land in Wolverton Norfolk. STAC 5/C14/12
+
*STAC 5/C20/37 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobbe v Edmund Grownde et uxor, John Hunt et uxor et al  
*STAC 5/C20/37 - B - 43 Eliz - William Cobbe v Edmund Grownde et uxor, John Hunt et uxor et al  
+
 
*STAC 5/C14/12 - B A Rn - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobbe v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor et al  
 
*STAC 5/C14/12 - B A Rn - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobbe v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor et al  
*STAC 5/C7/37 - I Dn - 44 Eliz - William Cobb v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor, John Souckton et uxor, Christopher Goodman et al  
+
**In re land in Wolverton Norfolk.
*see also [[STAC Cobbe]]
+
*STAC 5/C7/37 - I Dn - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobb v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor, John Souckton et uxor, Christopher Goodman et al  
 +
**see also [[STAC Cobbe]]
  
 
''' Cobbe v Radcliffe '''  
 
''' Cobbe v Radcliffe '''  
*Wolverton, Norfolk. Elizabeth Cobbe, widow. Trespass and destruction of property. Interrogatories administered on behalf of the plaintiff. STAC 10/2/7
 
 
*STAC 5/C46/8 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe, Gyles Skeete et al
 
*STAC 5/C46/8 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe, Gyles Skeete et al
 +
*STAC 5/C58/23 - I - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Giles Skyle et al
 
*STAC 10/2/7 - I - - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe
 
*STAC 10/2/7 - I - - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe
*see also [[STAC Cobbe]]  
+
**Wolverton, Norfolk. Elizabeth Cobbe, widow. Trespass and destruction of property. Interrogatories administered on behalf of the plaintiff.
 +
**see also [[STAC Cobbe]]
 +
 
 +
''' Cockett v Shouldham '''
 +
*STAC 5/C22/9 - B A R - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - Anthony Cockett v William Shouldham, Thomas Shouldham, Hugh Powel et al
 +
*STAC 5/C39/6 - I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - Anthony Cockett v Thomas Sholdom, William Sholdom, Thomas Curtis et al
 +
**Manor of Marham & Shouldham, Norfolk. Resistance to the execution of a writ from Common Pleas against William Shouldham.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Cockett]]
 +
 
 +
''' Cole v Whiting '''
 +
*STAC 5/C6/16 - B A C Rn - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - John Coles v [blank] Pyke, Thomas Whytinge, Richard Porter, William Hurman et al
 +
**Park called Kennyngale Old Parke in Kennyngale, Shelfhanger, Brysingham, Winfarthing & Forfeld, all Norfolk. Hunting deer with dogs & assault on keepers.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/C19/35 - B A - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - John Coles v Thomas Whytinge, William Harman et al
 +
*STAC 5/C53/37 - I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - John Coles v Thomas Whytinge, Richard Porter et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Cole]]
 +
 
 +
''' Collyson v Drake ''' 
 +
*STAC 5/C61/15 - B - 6 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Collyson v Francis Drake
 +
**Lands at Letheryngsett, Norfolk.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Collyson]]
 +
 
 +
''' Cooke v Dodge '''
 +
*STAC 5/C80/32 - B - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cooke v John Dodge, Thomas Fenn
 +
**Willm Cooke brother & heir to Thomas Cooke late of Little Barningham, Norfolk decd v John Dodge, Thomas Fen, Anthony Potter, Raphe Dodge, Robt Lumner, Robt Rogers, James Gunton et al. Land & crops in Barningham.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Cooke]]
  
 
''' Cooke v Jewell '''  
 
''' Cooke v Jewell '''  
*William Coke of Walcoote [Walcott] in Norfolk yeoman, two and a half acres of land in Estruston [East Ruston] Norfolk. STAC 5/C3/25
+
*STAC 5/C3/25 - B C A - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coke v Edmund Jewell et uxor, Thomas Jewell
*STAC 5/C3/25 - B C A - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - - William Coke v Edmund Jewell et uxor, Thomas Jewell
+
**William Coke of Walcoote [Walcott] in Norfolk yeoman, two and a half acres of land in Estruston [East Ruston] Norfolk.
*see also [[STAC Cooke]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Cooke]]  
  
 
''' Cooper v Goose '''  
 
''' Cooper v Goose '''  
*Isaac Cooper of Yarmouth in Norfolk merchant. Inheritance dispute. STAC 5/C3/12
+
*STAC 5/C3/12 - B A - Mich 44/45 Eliz - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose, George Goose
*STAC 5/C3/12 - B A - Mich 44/45 Eliz - - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose, George Goose
+
**Isaac Cooper of Yarmouth in Norfolk merchant. Inheritance dispute.
*STAC 5/C10/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - - John Cowper v William Goose, George Goose
+
*STAC 5/C10/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - John Cowper v William Goose, George Goose
*STAC 10/2/4 - Rn - - - - Isaac Cooper v William Goose and George Goose
+
*STAC 10/2/4 - Rn - - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose and George Goose
*see also [[STAC Cooper]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Cooper]]  
  
 
''' Coppin v Palmer '''  
 
''' Coppin v Palmer '''  
*William Coppinge of Beddingham in Norfolk. STAC 5/C2/6
 
 
*STAC 5/C2/6 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Felthrop, Robert Barker, Robert Gooche, Thomas Grimsbye et al  
 
*STAC 5/C2/6 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Felthrop, Robert Barker, Robert Gooche, Thomas Grimsbye et al  
 +
**William Coppinge of Beddingham in Norfolk.
 
*STAC 5/C64/16 - A Rn C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppin v Robert Palmer, William Jackson, Robert Barker et al
 
*STAC 5/C64/16 - A Rn C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppin v Robert Palmer, William Jackson, Robert Barker et al
 
*STAC 5/C29/38 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge et al v Robert Palmer, John Cunger, Thomas Grimsbye et al  
 
*STAC 5/C29/38 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge et al v Robert Palmer, John Cunger, Thomas Grimsbye et al  
 
*STAC 5/C71/12 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Nelthorpe et al
 
*STAC 5/C71/12 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Nelthorpe et al
*see also [[STAC Coppin]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Coppin]]  
  
 
''' Cornwallis v Gesh and Pinner '''  
 
''' Cornwallis v Gesh and Pinner '''  
*Charles Cornwaleys of Carowe in the County of the City of Norwich esquire. In re the manor of Kilverston in Norfolk. STAC 5/C1/24
 
*TNA Note: Kilverston: Forcible dispute as to cutting furze, etc. STAC 7/11/11
 
 
*STAC 5/C1/24 - B A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleys v Simon Gesh, John Pinner, John Smith, William Browett
 
*STAC 5/C1/24 - B A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleys v Simon Gesh, John Pinner, John Smith, William Browett
 +
**Charles Cornwaleys of Carowe in the County of the City of Norwich esquire. In re the manor of Kilverston in Norfolk.
 
*STAC 7/11/11 - - - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleis v Simon Gest, John Pynner
 
*STAC 7/11/11 - - - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleis v Simon Gest, John Pynner
*STAC 5/C72/1 - B A - 39 Eliz - - Charles Conwallis v William Le Gris, Robert Cottrell
+
**TNA Note: Kilverston: Forcible dispute as to cutting furze, etc.
*see also [[STAC Cornwallis]]
+
**see also [[STAC Cornwallis]]
  
 
''' Cromwell v Tavernor '''  
 
''' Cromwell v Tavernor '''  
*North Elmham, Norfolk. Referenced in [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=G6Jm4keX1t0C "Custom Improvement and Anti-Improvement in Early Modern Britain"] edited by Richard W. Hoyle, which also refers to related Chancery cases. STAC 5/C73/17; C35/9; C42/9; C58/5; C78/14
 
 
*STAC 5/C17/9 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Crumwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
 
*STAC 5/C17/9 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Crumwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
 
*STAC 5/C73/17 - I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Camwell [Cromwell] v James Taverner
 
*STAC 5/C73/17 - I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Camwell [Cromwell] v James Taverner
 +
**Case Book Report [[STAC 5/C73/17r]]
 +
*STAC 5/C35/9 - B A R Rr - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v James Taverner, William Batche
 
*STAC 5/C30/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor
 
*STAC 5/C30/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor
 
*STAC 5/C58/5 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
 
*STAC 5/C58/5 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
*STAC 5/C78/14 - I - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Taverner
+
*STAC 5/C78/14 - I - - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Taverner
 
*STAC 5/C73/3 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
 
*STAC 5/C73/3 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
 
*STAC 5/C45/36 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Crumwell v James Taverner et al  
 
*STAC 5/C45/36 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Crumwell v James Taverner et al  
 
*STAC 5/C32/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v John Browne
 
*STAC 5/C32/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v John Browne
 
*STAC 5/C38/21 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
 
*STAC 5/C38/21 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
*STAC 5/C28/3 - I D - 23 Eliz - - Lord Cromwell v Edward Daulton, Val(entine) Hartoppe, Martyn Arden et al
+
**see also [[STAC Cromwell]] and [[STAC Taverner]]
 +
 
 +
''' Cromwell v Steward '''
 
*STAC 5/C42/9 - B A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v Thomas Steward, John Taverner et al  
 
*STAC 5/C42/9 - B A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v Thomas Steward, John Taverner et al  
*STAC 5/C53/16 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Lord Crumwell v Thomas Steward
+
*STAC 5/C53/16 - I D - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v Thomas Steward
*STAC 5/C74/14 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Lord Cromwell v Roger Townshend
+
*STAC 5/C74/14 - I D - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v Roger Townshend
*see also [[STAC Cromwell]] see also [[STAC Taverner]]
+
**North Elmham, Norfolk. Referenced in [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=G6Jm4keX1t0C "Custom Improvement and Anti-Improvement in Early Modern Britain"] edited by Richard W. Hoyle, which also refers to related Chancery cases. STAC 5/C73/17; C35/9; C42/9; C58/5; C78/14
 +
**see also [[STAC Cromwell]] and [[STAC Taverner]]
 +
 
 +
''' Crosse v Futter '''
 +
*STAC 5/C78/13 - D - 1 Eliz - Norfolk - [blank] Crosse v [blank] Futter et al
 +
**Depositions of Nicholas ?Parker? and others. Messuage in Bryssingham, Norfolk.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Cross]]
 +
 
 +
''' Crowe v Hutchinson '''
 +
*STAC 5/C69/12 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Crowe v Miles Warde, Ann Hutchinson
 +
*STAC 5/C64/3 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Crowe v Ann Hutchinson, Miles Word
 +
**Interrs refer to assizes held at Thetford, Norfolk.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Crowe]]
 +
 
 +
''' Cubitt v Kempe '''
 +
*STAC/C64/9 - B - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Cubitt v John Kempe, James Smyth et al
 +
**Thomas Cubitt of Groningham, Norfolk. Lease of messuage etc in Alborough & Thurgarton, Norfolk for life of complts wife Margaret.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Cubbitt]]
  
 
''' Curdey v Skeet '''   
 
''' Curdey v Skeet '''   
*William Curdy of Aldeburgh in Norfolk. STAC 5/C1/37
 
 
*STAC 5/C1/37 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdy v John Skeete Sr, John Skette Jr, John Orrys, Richard Smyth  
 
*STAC 5/C1/37 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdy v John Skeete Sr, John Skette Jr, John Orrys, Richard Smyth  
 +
**William Curdy of Aldeburgh in Norfolk.
 
*STAC 5/C48/21 - I - Norfolk - William Curdye v John Orrys, John Skete Sr, John Skete Jr
 
*STAC 5/C48/21 - I - Norfolk - William Curdye v John Orrys, John Skete Sr, John Skete Jr
 
*STAC 5/C19/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdys v Richard Smith
 
*STAC 5/C19/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdys v Richard Smith
*see also [[STAC Curdey]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Curdey]]  
  
 
''' Curtis v Evance '''
 
''' Curtis v Evance '''
*Thomas Curteis of Lynn Regis Norfolk. STAC 5/C3/5
+
*STAC 5/C3/5 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Curteis v Edmond Evance, Thomas Burton.
*STAC 5/C3/5 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Curteis v Edmond Evance, Thomas Burton
+
**Transcribed [[STAC 5/C3/5]]
*see also [[STAC Curtis]]  
+
**Thomas Curteis of Lynn Regis Norfolk.
 +
**see also [[STAC Curtis]]
 +
 
 +
''' D '''
 +
 
 +
''' Dalton, Thomas ''' 
 +
*STAC 7/2/14 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Dalton v John Howe, Robert Davy, John Egmer, William Deker et al
 +
*STAC 7/2/14 - TNA Notes: Norwolde (Northwold or Norwood?) Forcible ejection, assault, and procurement of illegal title to a messuage
 +
**see also [[STAC Dalton]]
 +
 
 +
''' Day v Cobbe '''
 +
*STAC 5/D34/30 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Cuthbert Dey v William Cobbe, John Butler, Thomas Back et al
 +
**Breaking terms of lease. (cm)
 +
**see also [[STAC Day]]
 +
 
 +
''' Daynes v Robinson ''' 
 +
*STAC 5/D2/28 - B - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - John Daynes v John Robinson
 +
**John Daynes of Buxton, Norfolk. Title to messuage etc in Hicklinge, Norfolk, formerly of Christopher Heath of Hicklinge.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Deane]]
 +
 
 +
''' Denney v Gee and Butler '''
 +
*STAC 5/D37/32 - B A R - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - George Denney v William Gee, Thomas Osborne, John Butler et al
 +
*STAC 5/D41/12 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - George Dennye v John Butler et al
 +
*STAC 5/D26/36 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - George Dennye v John Butler, William Osborne
 +
*STAC 5/D33/15 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - George Denny v John Butler
 +
*STAC 5/D28/22 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - George Denny v William Gee
 +
*STAC 5/D16/22 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - George Dennye v John Butler
 +
**Claim that a will proved at the Consistory Court of Norwich had been fraudulently altered. Deponents from Lincoln's Inn, Middx & Kings Lynn, Norfolk.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/D20/1 - B - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - George Dennise v William Gee
 +
**see also [[STAC Denny]]
 +
 
 +
''' Denny v Robbins '''
 +
*STAC 5/D42/8 - B - - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Symon Robbins, Katherine Fitt et al
 +
**Edward Dennye of the City of Norwich, grocer. Breaking down walls of a chamber & kitchen & taking away complts goods, under cover of administring the estate of Richard Pitt late of the City of Norwich, who had been a tenant of the complt.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/D41/14 - A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Denney v Symon Robins et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Denny]]
 +
 
 +
''' Denny v Sergeant '''
 +
*STAC 5/D34/16 - B - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Thomas Sergeant, Edmund Smyth
 +
**Norwich, Dispute over a bond; Debt. (cm)
 +
**see also [[STAC Denny]]
 +
 
 +
''' Denney v Tyler '''
 +
*STAC 5/D33/35 - B A - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Johane Tyler et al
 +
*STAC 5/D5/6 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Johne Tyler et al
 +
**Interrogatories to be ministered to Johane Tyler one of the defts on behalf of Edward Dennye complt. What kinred or affinity is or was between you Johane Tyler and Simon Robbyns of Norwich, oatmeal maker & Richard Fitt late of Norwich, carrier. Did you meet with the said Edward Dennye in Norwich in the day wherein the said Richard Fitt was buried. (dk)
 +
*STAC 7/11/17 - - - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Joan Tyler
 +
**TNA Note: Perjury in the Court of Requests
 +
*STAC 5/D25/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Johane Tyler widow
 +
**see also [[STAC Denny]]
 +
 
 +
''' Denny v Whall '''
 +
*STAC 5/D29/38 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Denny v James Morrant, Thomas Whall
 +
*STAC 5/D37/8 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Dennys v James Morant
 +
*STAC 5/D14/34 - B Dr - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Denny v Augustine Whall, Thomas Whall et al
 +
**Edward Dennie of the City of Norwich. False accusations and slander in response to case at Norwich Sessions & also previous case of libel brought by this complt to this court.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Denny]]
  
 
''' Dereham v Barton '''  
 
''' Dereham v Barton '''  
*TNA Note: West Dereham: Affray. STAC 7/11/27
 
 
*STAC 5/D21/8 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, Robert Edge, John Atkins
 
*STAC 5/D21/8 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, Robert Edge, John Atkins
 
*STAC 5/D36/17 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, John Atkins
 
*STAC 5/D36/17 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, John Atkins
 
*STAC 5/D34/26 - C I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dearham v Peter Barton
 
*STAC 5/D34/26 - C I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dearham v Peter Barton
 
*STAC 7/11/27 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Deareham v Peter Barton, John Atkyns
 
*STAC 7/11/27 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Deareham v Peter Barton, John Atkyns
 +
**TNA Note: West Dereham: Affray.
 
*STAC 7/20/25 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Derham v Peter Barton et al
 
*STAC 7/20/25 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Derham v Peter Barton et al
*see also [[STAC Dereham]]
+
**see also [[STAC Dereham]]
 +
 
 +
''' Dewing v Dynne '''
 +
*STAC 5/D41/27 - Dr - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Dewinge v Thomas Dynne
 +
*STAC 5/D1/10 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Dewing v Robert Haude
 +
**Deponents: Robert Haude, of ?Hackford?, Norfolk, tallow chandler, aged 45. (dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Dewing]]
 +
 
 +
''' Doddington v Farmer '''
 +
*STAC 5/D3/31 - B - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Leonard Doddington v Thomas Farmer, Erasmus Dymye, Edward Growte, Robert Armstrong et al
 +
**Leonard Doddington of West Barsham Norfolk gent. Thomas Farmer of East Barsham esq
 +
**see also [[STAC Doddington]]
 +
 
 +
''' Doddington v Farmer '''
 +
*STAC 5/D3/2 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Leonard Doddington v Thomas Farmer, Geoffry Tuttle, George Sherwood, Robert Kesil et al
 +
**West Barsham, Norfolk
 +
*STAC 5/D39/25 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Leonard Doddington v John Deane Jr, Richard Mason, George Pinder
 +
*STAC 5/D25/5 - D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Leonard Doddington v   
 +
**see also [[STAC Doddington]]
 +
 
 +
''' Dodge v Cooke '''
 +
*STAC 5/D3/4 - B A - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - John Dodge v Thomas Cooke, William Cooke, Robert Eldin, John Doe
 +
*STAC 5/D26/16 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - John Dodge v William Cooke, Robert Eldinge, John Dove
 +
*STAC 5/D10/30 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - John Dodge v Thomas Cooke, William Cooke, Robert Eldinge et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Dodge]]
 +
 
 +
''' E '''
 +
 
 +
''' Eastgate v Harrold '''
 +
*STAC 5/E6/31 - B A - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Estgate v Richard Barfoote, John Harrold et al
 +
**Henry Estgate of Shingham, Norfolk executor of his brother Wyllm Estgate late of Stanford, Norfolk v Rychard Barfoote (decd's nephew), John Harrold & Abraham Symonds. Breaking into chest a the decd at Stanford while he on his deathbed at Thetford, Norfolk & stealing bills, bonds, money plate etc.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/E13/1 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Eastgate v John Harrold et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Eastgate]]
  
 
''' Eden v Downing '''
 
''' Eden v Downing '''
*Thomas Edon of Martham co Norfolk yeoman. Whereas the Dean and Chapter of Norwich owned the rectory of Martham and the parsonage house. 21 year lease to complainant.  Answer of William Downinge gent. Now so it is may it please your most excellent Majesty that Wm Downing gent, Edward Browne, Simonde Sippens, Richard Tompson, and Robert Buclingham and divers other persons to your said subject unknown, hot [having] the fear of god before their eis nor any dutiful regard to your Majesties good and godlie laws upon the 9th day of may now last passed did in warlike disorderlie and unlawfull manner assemble and bande themsellves together at Martham. And upon the said day with force and arms that is to say with swords halberts morris pykes piked staves and divers other weapons as well invasive as defensive into the said messuage called the parsonage house forcible riotously and unlawfully did break and enter. And one Anthony Edon and one Richarde Wattes then [being in] the said messuage by the appointment and commandment of your said subject did beat wound and evell intreat. STAC 5/E1/14
 
*STAC 5/E15/33 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Eden v William Downing Edward Browne et al
 
*STAC 5/E11/38 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v William Doewning, Henry Wilcocks, Robert Hall et al
 
*STAC 5/E13/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Edon v William Downinge, Edward Browne
 
*STAC 5/E14/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Henry Willcock, William Downing, Robert Layton
 
 
*STAC 5/E1/14 - B A Rn Rr - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden v William Downing, Edward Brown, Simon Sippens, Richard Thompson et al
 
*STAC 5/E1/14 - B A Rn Rr - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden v William Downing, Edward Brown, Simon Sippens, Richard Thompson et al
*STAC 5/E2/5 - A - 33 Eliz - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Robert Burlingham
+
*STAC 5/E15/33 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden v William Downing Edward Browne et al
*see also [[STAC Eden]]
+
*STAC 5/E13/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Edon v William Downinge, Edward Browne
 +
**Parsonage House in Martham, Norfolk. Deft William Downing is of Yarmouth, Norfolk.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Eden]]
 +
 
 +
''' Eden v Downing '''
 +
*STAC 5/E11/38 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v William Doewning, Henry Wilcocks, Robert Hall et al
 +
*STAC 5/E14/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Henry Willcock, William Downing, Robert Layton
 +
**Thomas Edon of Martham co Norfolk yeoman. Whereas the Dean and Chapter of Norwich owned the rectory of Martham and the parsonage house. 21 year lease to complainant.  Answer of William Downinge gent. Now so it is may it please your most excellent Majesty that Wm Downing gent, Edward Browne, Simonde Sippens, Richard Tompson, and Robert Buclingham and divers other persons to your said subject unknown, hot [having] the fear of god before their eis nor any dutiful regard to your Majesties good and godlie laws upon the 9th day of may now last passed did in warlike disorderlie and unlawfull manner assemble and bande themsellves together at Martham. And upon the said day with force and arms that is to say with swords halberts morris pykes piked staves and divers other weapons as well invasive as defensive into the said messuage called the parsonage house forcible riotously and unlawfully did break and enter. And one Anthony Edon and one Richarde Wattes then [being in] the said messuage by the appointment and commandment of your said subject did beat wound and evell intreat.
 +
*STAC 5/E2/5 - A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Robert Burlingham
 +
**see also [[STAC Eden]]
  
 
''' Evans v Newbie '''
 
''' Evans v Newbie '''
*Thomas Evans of the parish of Saxtropte [Saxthorpe?] co Norfolk. Two water mills for the grinding of Corn and one other mill for fullinge of Clothe scituate and being within the parish of Horsteed [Horstead] co Norfolk. Forcible entry and ejection. STAC 5/E1/12
 
 
*STAC 5/E1/12 - B - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Evans v Edmund Newbie, Robert Usher, Nicholas Kent, Robert Blenkinsop alias Sextus, John Mower, Clement Warnes, William Tompson [  ] Davison  
 
*STAC 5/E1/12 - B - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Evans v Edmund Newbie, Robert Usher, Nicholas Kent, Robert Blenkinsop alias Sextus, John Mower, Clement Warnes, William Tompson [  ] Davison  
*STAC 5/E9/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Evans v Edmond Newby et al
+
**Thomas Evans of the parish of Saxtropte [Saxthorpe?] co Norfolk. Two water mills for the grinding of Corn and one other mill for fullinge of Clothe scituate and being within the parish of Horsteed [Horstead] co Norfolk. Forcible entry and ejection.
*see also [[STAC Evans]]
+
*STAC 5/E9/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Evans v Edmond Newby et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Evans]]
 +
 
 +
''' Exham v Cubitt '''
 +
*STAC 5/E4/7 - B A C I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Exham v Edward Cubytt, Thomas Greene et al
 +
**Deponents: William Cubytte, Thomas Grene, William Goodwyne, Edward Palmer gent, John Marker yeoman, Robert Aldrich yeoman, James Meeke, William Deynes. A questionable deed of feoffment, Acle Norfolk
 +
**see also [[STAC Exham]] for other possible references
 +
 
 +
''' F '''
  
 
''' Farmor v Haydon '''
 
''' Farmor v Haydon '''
*Thomas Farmor of East Bashnn’in co Norfolk esquire. STAC 5/F3/27
 
 
*STAC 5/F30/39 - B - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermer v Sir William Heydon
 
*STAC 5/F30/39 - B - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermer v Sir William Heydon
 
*STAC 5/F3/27 - B A C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Farmor v Sir William Haydon.
 
*STAC 5/F3/27 - B A C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Farmor v Sir William Haydon.
*see also [[STAC Farmer]]  
+
**Thomas Farmor of East Bashnn’in co Norfolk esquire.
 +
**see also [[STAC Farmer]]
 +
 
 +
''' Farmor v Grimston '''
 +
*STAC 5/F3/19 - B A - Hli 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grympston.
 +
**Transcription [[STAC 5/F3/19]]
 +
*STAC 5/F21/22 - B - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Farmer v Christopher Grimeston
 +
*STAC 5/F20/28 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grimston
 +
*STAC 5/F17/22 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grynston
 +
**see also [[STAC Farmer]]
  
 
''' Fawcett v Woolman, Boston and Sharpe '''
 
''' Fawcett v Woolman, Boston and Sharpe '''
*James Fawcett of Kings Lynne in the co of Norfolk whereas Robert Page and Elizabeth his wife executrix of Wm Judye deceased  . . was possessed of one cupboard and divers other goods . .  STAC 5/F22/14
 
 
*STAC 5/F22/14 - B A Rn C - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcett v William Wolman, John Sharpe et al.
 
*STAC 5/F22/14 - B A Rn C - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcett v William Wolman, John Sharpe et al.
 +
**James Fawcett of Kings Lynne in the co of Norfolk whereas Robert Page and Elizabeth his wife executrix of Wm Judye deceased . . was possessed of one cupboard and divers other goods . . Perjury & false declaration in the Court of Kings Lynne.(dk)
 
*STAC 5/F4/2 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcet v William Wolman, John Sharp, Thomas Boston, Thomas Miller et al
 
*STAC 5/F4/2 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcet v William Wolman, John Sharp, Thomas Boston, Thomas Miller et al
 
*STAC 5/F31/28 - Rr - - Norfolk - James Fawcet v Thomas Boston, William Woolman et al
 
*STAC 5/F31/28 - Rr - - Norfolk - James Fawcet v Thomas Boston, William Woolman et al
*see also [[STAC Fawcett]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Fawcett]]  
  
 
''' Fenn v Flowerdew '''
 
''' Fenn v Flowerdew '''
*TNA Note: Burston and Thirning: Estate of Thomas Appleton. STAC 7/12/7
 
 
*STAC 5/F26/21 - B - - Norfolk - William Fenn v Thomas Allenn, Stephen Flowerdue et al
 
*STAC 5/F26/21 - B - - Norfolk - William Fenn v Thomas Allenn, Stephen Flowerdue et al
 
*STAC 5/F8/12 - Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdine et uxor, John Vinyor Sr  et al
 
*STAC 5/F8/12 - Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdine et uxor, John Vinyor Sr  et al
 
*STAC 5/F6/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenn v Stephen Flowerden et uxor, Thomas Allen et al
 
*STAC 5/F6/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenn v Stephen Flowerden et uxor, Thomas Allen et al
 
*STAC 5/F13/17 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdew et al
 
*STAC 5/F13/17 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdew et al
 +
**Interrs refer to lands in Burston & Thurnynge. Depositions taken at Aylsham. Deponent from Norfolk.(dk)
 
*STAC 7/12/7 - - - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdewe, et Agnes uxor, John Vinyour et al
 
*STAC 7/12/7 - - - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdewe, et Agnes uxor, John Vinyour et al
*see also [[STAC Fenn]]  
+
**TNA Note: Burston and Thirning: Estate of Thomas Appleton.
 +
**see also [[STAC Fenn]]  
  
 
''' Fenton v Wright '''
 
''' Fenton v Wright '''
*That whereas one Robert Clarke of Walpole in the co of Norfolk deceased . . . STAC 5/F2/5
 
 
*STAC 5/F10/23 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, William Edes et al
 
*STAC 5/F10/23 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, William Edes et al
 
*STAC 5/F2/5 - B A C - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, Henry Huntson, William Brown, William Eades et al.
 
*STAC 5/F2/5 - B A C - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, Henry Huntson, William Brown, William Eades et al.
 +
**That whereas one Robert Clarke of Walpole in the co of Norfolk deceased . . .
 
*STAC 5/F16/15 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright, William Welbie et al
 
*STAC 5/F16/15 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright, William Welbie et al
*see also [[STAC Fenton]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Fenton]]
 +
 
 +
''' Fisher v Grey '''
 +
*STAC 5/F13/6 - B A C I D - 4 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Fisher v David Grey
 +
**Whereas one Davyd Maydowye als David Graye of Upwell, Norfolk, a Scott and no denizen is and of long time hath been a common disturber of all your quiet & well disposed subjects. Bribery of poor people under threat of taking them to court at Westminster under accusations of regrating and forestalling or unlawfully trying to sell corn. Example of Norfolk spelt as Northfolke.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Fisher]]  
  
 
''' Fiske v Goldsmith and Gaunt '''
 
''' Fiske v Goldsmith and Gaunt '''
*Ambrose Fyske of Welles in co Norfolk, merchaunte was impleaded by one Edwarde Waytes before the Mayor and recorder of Lynne in the town court there . . . an action upon the case . . Waytes and John Chartres of Lynne merchaunt bought of Fyske one ship called the George for 240li.) STAC 5/F22/19
 
*TNA Notes: Lynn: Perjury in a suit concerning a ship. STAC 7/2/29
 
 
*STAC 5/F22/19 - B A - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fiske v Henry Goldsmith, Christopher Gaunte et al
 
*STAC 5/F22/19 - B A - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fiske v Henry Goldsmith, Christopher Gaunte et al
 +
**Ambrose Fyske of Welles in co Norfolk, merchaunte was impleaded by one Edwarde Waytes before the Mayor and recorder of Lynne in the town court there . . . an action upon the case . . Waytes and John Chartres of Lynne merchaunt bought of Fyske one ship called the George for 240li.)
 
*STAC 5/F12/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Christopher Grante, Nicholas Derbye et al
 
*STAC 5/F12/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Christopher Grante, Nicholas Derbye et al
 
*STAC 7/2/29 - - - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Edward Waytes, Christopher Gaunt
 
*STAC 7/2/29 - - - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Edward Waytes, Christopher Gaunt
*see also [[STAC Fiske]]  
+
**TNA Notes: Lynn: Perjury in a suit concerning a ship.
 +
**see also [[STAC Fiske]]  
  
 
''' Flatman v Ward and Pigeon '''
 
''' Flatman v Ward and Pigeon '''
*TNA Note: Norwich: Verdict of deft's, as a jury. STAC 7/12/9
+
*STAC 5/F19/4 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v William Ward, John Pigeon, Robert Prentice
*STAC 5/F19/4 - B A - 37 Eliz - - Richard Flatman v William Ward, John Pigeon, Robert Prentice
+
*STAC 5/F25/23 - B A C - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Flattman v William Ward, Robert Prentice et al
*STAC 5/F25/23 - B A C - 38 Eliz - - Richard Flattman v William Ward, Robert Prentice et al
+
 
*STAC 5/F24/7 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Bigeon, Robert Tyte
 
*STAC 5/F24/7 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Bigeon, Robert Tyte
 
*STAC 7/12/9 - - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Pigeon, John Tyte et al
 
*STAC 7/12/9 - - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Pigeon, John Tyte et al
*STAC 5/F18/22 - I - - - Richard Flatman v Thomas Downing et al
+
**TNA Note: Norwich: Verdict of deft's, as a jury.
*STAC 5/F12/32 - A - 38 Eliz - - Richard Flatman et al v Thomas Downing
+
**see also [[STAC Flatman]]  
*see also [[STAC Flatman]]  
+
  
 
''' Flatman v Carter '''
 
''' Flatman v Carter '''
*Thomas Flatman of Sterston, Norfolk. STAC 5/F2/20, STAC 5/F2/1
 
 
*STAC 5/F2/20 - B - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Carter, John Rose, Richard Shreve, Henry Horne
 
*STAC 5/F2/20 - B - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Carter, John Rose, Richard Shreve, Henry Horne
*see also [[STAC Flatman]]  
+
**Thomas Flatman of Sterston, Norfolk.
 +
**see also [[STAC Flatman]]  
  
 
''' Flatman v Flatman '''
 
''' Flatman v Flatman '''
*Thomas Flatman of Sterston, Norfolk. STAC 5/F2/20, STAC 5/F2/1
 
 
*STAC 5/F2/1 - B Dr - Trin 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Flatman, Robert Prince, Richard Flatman, et al
 
*STAC 5/F2/1 - B Dr - Trin 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Flatman, Robert Prince, Richard Flatman, et al
*see also [[STAC Flatman]]  
+
**Thomas Flatman of Sterston, Norfolk.
 +
**see also [[STAC Flatman]]
 +
 
 +
''' Flint v Jenippe '''
 +
*STAC 5/F12/17 - B A Rn Rr - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Flynt v Robert Jenyppe, William Etheridge et al
 +
*STAC 5/F9/36 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Flyatt v Robert Jemppe, William Etheridge et al
 +
**Interrogatories to be ministered to Robt Jemppe, William Etheridge, James Beales, Leonard Hodges & Harry James defts at the suit of Robt Flyutt/Flyatt gent, include: Do you know the piece of ground mentioned in the bill, lately inclosed by Robt Flyutt. Do you know of any inclosure made about the said parcel of ground in the time of John Chamberlaine late Lord of the manor of Little Elingham and what person(s) attempted to pull down the rails. Did the parson of your town either in the pulpit or otherwise, preach or speak against the same inclosure. Depositions, 26 Jun Anno 24 Eliz: Robert Jempye of Ellingham Norfolk husbandman, William Etheridge of Ellingham Norfolk carpenter, James Beales of Ellingham Norfolk husbandman, Leonard Hogges of Ellingham Norfolk cooper, Henry James of Ellingham Norfolk husbandman (dk)
 +
*STAC 5/F15/40 - B A - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Flynt v Robert Jennepy
 +
*STAC 5/F31/10 - Rn - - Norfolk - Robert Flynt v Robert Jenype
 +
*STAC 5/F27/2 - I D - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Flynt v Thomas Diamond, John Dyver et al
 +
*STAC 5/F18/30 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Flynte v Robert Jenippe
 +
**see also [[STAC Flint]]  
  
 
''' Forest v Lacy and Booth '''
 
''' Forest v Lacy and Booth '''
*John Forrest gent. of Holkham Norfolk and Alice his wife, late the widow and administratrix of Edmund Windham esquire. STAC 5/F3/14
 
 
*STAC 5/F3/14 - B A - Trin 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest et uxor v John Lacey, William Booeth, George Booeth et uxor, John Burbitch et al.
 
*STAC 5/F3/14 - B A - Trin 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest et uxor v John Lacey, William Booeth, George Booeth et uxor, John Burbitch et al.
 +
**John Forrest gent. of Holkham Norfolk and Alice his wife, late the widow and administratrix of Edmund Windham esquire.
 
*STAC 5/F19/19 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest v George Boothe, John Burbyche, Henry Call
 
*STAC 5/F19/19 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest v George Boothe, John Burbyche, Henry Call
*see also [[STAC Forest]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Forest]]
 +
 
 +
''' Fowler v Wright '''
 +
*STAC 5/F12/12 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - George Fowler v Thomas Wright, William Mater et al
 +
**George Fowler of Bromehill, Norfolk. Perjury. Customs of the manor. Refers to Chancery bill of Thomas Wright & John Fysher of Wetinge, Norfolk v George Fowler.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Fowler]]
  
 
''' Fulhurste v Vowell '''
 
''' Fulhurste v Vowell '''
*George Fulhurste of London gent. Thomas Vowell in [blank] co Norfolk. STAC 5/F3/30
 
 
*STAC 5/F3/30 - B - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - George Fulshurste v Thomas Vowell, Robert Vowell, Richard Fiejohn alias Feejohn, Robert Franklin et al  
 
*STAC 5/F3/30 - B - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - George Fulshurste v Thomas Vowell, Robert Vowell, Richard Fiejohn alias Feejohn, Robert Franklin et al  
*see also [[STAC Fullhurst]]  
+
**George Fulhurste of London gent. Thomas Vowell in [blank] co Norfolk.
 +
**see also [[STAC Fullhurst]]
 +
 
 +
''' Fuller v Blowfield '''
 +
*STAC 5/F2/8 - B - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blonfield
 +
**See the Case inter Fuller et Blofeild where the procurer of a perjurie was Convicted & the perjurie never dealt with or prosecuted. BL Harley 2143 f.11v - P 16 Eliz
 +
*STAC 5/F10/8 - A  - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blowfeld
 +
*STAC 5/F1/2 - I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blofeld
 +
**Interrogatories to be ministered on behalf of John Fuller complt against John ?Blouffeld deft, include: Were you bound 3 April 11 Eliz to the complt in £110. Did you retain Mr Cobbe, clerk of assise at Thetforde assise [Norfolk]. Did you know George Galtye, William Taylour, John Bright & William Harmer, and what money or rewards did you give them before the said assise at Thetford last past. Deposition 19 May Anno 14 Eliz: John Blofelde of Cromer Norfolk gentleman
 +
*STAC 5/F31/1 - C I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blowfeld
 +
*STAC 5/F23/29 - Rn - - Norfolk - John Fullar v John Blowfeild
 +
*STAC 5/F5/7 - I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blonfild
 +
*STAC 7/21/30 - - - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blowfyld
 +
**see also [[STAC Fuller]]
  
 
''' Fuller v Dalton and Elmer '''
 
''' Fuller v Dalton and Elmer '''
*Thomas Fuller of Norhold in co Norfolk. Henry Sparrowe and Robart Dalton of the said town yeomen. STAC 5/F3/5
+
*STAC 5/F7/33 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Richard Elemour, Thomas Neale et al
*STAC 5/F7/33 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - - Thomas Fuller v Richard Elemour, Thomas Neale et al
+
 
*STAC 5/F1/11 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller, Henry Sparrow, Robert Dalton v Richard Elmor, Thomas Neale, Robert Sparrow, Robert Raymond Sr, Robert Raymond Jr
 
*STAC 5/F1/11 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller, Henry Sparrow, Robert Dalton v Richard Elmor, Thomas Neale, Robert Sparrow, Robert Raymond Sr, Robert Raymond Jr
 
*STAC 5/F3/5 - B Dr - Hil 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Dalton, Richard Elmer
 
*STAC 5/F3/5 - B Dr - Hil 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Dalton, Richard Elmer
*STAC 5/F7/14 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Thomas Fuller v Robert Rayner Sr et al
+
**Thomas Fuller of Norhold in co Norfolk. Henry Sparrowe and Robart Dalton of the said town yeomen.
*see also [[STAC Fuller]]
+
*STAC 5/F7/14 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Rayner Sr et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Fuller]]
 +
 
 +
''' Fuller v Stone '''
 +
*STAC 5/F13/24 - B A - - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Thomas Stone, Richard Raven, William Pytte et al
 +
**Thomas Fuller of Morley, Norfolk. Customs of commoning at Morley, Norfolk.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/F21/23 - I D - 9 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v William Pyttes, Stephen Chytterlyn et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Fuller]]
 +
 
 +
''' G '''
  
 
''' Gurboldsham v Muskett '''
 
''' Gurboldsham v Muskett '''
*All Saints Garboldisham, Norfolk. STAC 5/G14/1
 
 
*STAC 5/G14/1 - B - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - The Parishioners of Gurboldsham all Saints, v William Muskett, Simon Muskett.  
 
*STAC 5/G14/1 - B - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - The Parishioners of Gurboldsham all Saints, v William Muskett, Simon Muskett.  
*see also [[STAC Garboldisham]]  
+
**All Saints Garboldisham, Norfolk.
 +
**see also [[STAC Garboldisham]]
 +
 
 +
''' Gurdon v Peirson '''
 +
*STAC 5/G8/39 - B A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Gyrdon v Thomas Peirson
 +
**John Gyrden of Walpole, Norfolk. Fraudulent insertion into the will of Robert Gyrden after his death, bill recites will. Messuage in Walpole.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Gurdon]]
 +
 
 +
''' H '''
 +
 
 +
''' Harvey v Chardelowe '''
 +
*STAC 5/H35/19 - B - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Harvie v John Chardelowe, John Howard, Thomas Wales et al
 +
**Thomas Harvie, citizen & grocer of London & Edmond Clarke of Brissingham, Norfolk. Fraud. Norfolk.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Harvey]]
 +
 
 +
''' Hilton v Boulton '''
 +
*STAC 5/H20/28 - B A Rn Rr - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Matthew Hilton v Francis Boulton, John Shurlowe et al
 +
*STAC 5/H32/8 - I D - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Matthew Hilton v Francis Boulton et al
 +
*STAC 5/H53/25 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Matthew Hilton v Francis Bolton, et al
 +
**Interrogatories to be ministered to witnesses on behalf of Mathewe Hilton gent complt against Francis Bowlton gent & others defts, include: Did you know John Hiltonn, clerk, late parson of Burston, Norfolk decd. Do you know how much ready money, gold, plate or jewels the said John Hilton had at his death. Deponent, 24 Apr Anno 33 Eliz,Thernbyn Brook of Waynefild Suffolk yeoman aged 26. Deponent, 27 Apr Anno 33 Eliz, Anthony Shardilowe of Mettfield Suffolk gentleman aged 37
 +
**see also [[STAC Hilton]]
 +
 
 +
''' Hobart v Hobart '''
 +
*STAC 5/H35/17 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Hobart v Thomas Hobart, John Brend
 +
**Henry Hobarte of Intwoode, Norfolk. Wardship of Thomas Hobarte son & heir of Miles Hobarte late of Little Plumsted, Norfolk.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Hobart]]
  
 
''' Howard v Mulley '''
 
''' Howard v Mulley '''
*TNA Notes: Kenninghall: Resistance to a distress. STAC 7/3/7
 
 
*STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon
 
*STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon
*see also [[STAC Howard]]
+
**TNA Notes: Kenninghall: Resistance to a distress.
 +
**see also [[STAC Howard]]
  
 
''' Hunt v Whiting '''
 
''' Hunt v Whiting '''
*TNA Note: Gimingham: Forcible entry on lands held of the manor. STAC 7/12/37
 
 
*STAC 5/H60/31 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting, John Browne et al
 
*STAC 5/H60/31 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting, John Browne et al
 
*STAC 5/H18/23 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting
 
*STAC 5/H18/23 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting
 
*STAC 5/H28/13 - I D - 10 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Wytty et al
 
*STAC 5/H28/13 - I D - 10 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Wytty et al
 
*STAC 7/12/37 - - - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Windam, Thomas Wyttye, Walter Whiting, Robert Howse et al
 
*STAC 7/12/37 - - - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Windam, Thomas Wyttye, Walter Whiting, Robert Howse et al
*see also [[STAC Hunt]]
+
**TNA Note: Gimingham: Forcible entry on lands held of the manor.
 +
**see also [[STAC Hunt]]
 +
 
 +
''' I J '''
  
 
''' Ireland v Wright and Bright '''
 
''' Ireland v Wright and Bright '''
*The Complainant was in the Fleet prison at the suit of Thomas Tooley on a forged bond. Deposition of Thomas Bleverhassell of the City of Norwich. STAC 5/J3/20
+
*STAC 5/J7/28 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
*STAC 5/J7/28 - B A - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
+
 
*STAC 5/J3/20 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
 
*STAC 5/J3/20 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
*STAC 5/J15/39 - Rn - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Peter Bright, Thomas Wright, Thomas Buxley
+
**The Complainant was in the Fleet prison at the suit of Thomas Tooley on a forged bond. Deposition of Thomas Bleverhassell of the City of Norwich.
*STAC 5/J20/32 - I D - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Thomas Wright, Peter Bright et al
+
*STAC 5/J15/39 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, Thomas Wright, Thomas Buxley
*STAC 5/J22/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v John Puxley, Thomas Wright et al
+
*STAC 5/J20/32 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Thomas Wright, Peter Bright et al
*see also [[STAC Ireland]]  
+
*STAC 5/J22/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v John Puxley, Thomas Wright et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Ireland]]  
  
 
''' Jennor v Fairfax '''
 
''' Jennor v Fairfax '''
*Francis Jennor is an infant. Margaret Jennor his mother acts for him. STAC 5/J4/13
 
 
*STAC 5/J7/30 - B A Rn - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v Thomas Jennor, John Jennor, William Fayrefax
 
*STAC 5/J7/30 - B A Rn - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v Thomas Jennor, John Jennor, William Fayrefax
 
*STAC 5/J4/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v William Fairfax et al
 
*STAC 5/J4/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v William Fairfax et al
*STAC 5/J14/30 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Jennor, Margery Jennor v William Raynface
+
**Francis Jennor is an infant. Margaret Jennor his mother acts for him.
*see also [[STAC Jenner]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Jenner]]  
  
 
''' Jervis v Tubbard '''
 
''' Jervis v Tubbard '''
*Messuage in Felbrigge Norfolk. STAC 5/J3/16
 
 
*STAC 5/J3/16 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervys, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henbury
 
*STAC 5/J3/16 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervys, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henbury
*STAC 5/J7/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - William Jervis, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henburye
+
**Messuage in Felbrigge Norfolk.
*STAC 5/J13/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - William Jearvens v Christopher Henbery, Edward Tubberd
+
*STAC 5/J7/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervis, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henburye
*see also [[STAC Jervais]]
+
*STAC 5/J13/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jearvens v Christopher Henbery, Edward Tubberd
 +
**see also [[STAC Jervais]]
  
 
''' Johnson v Smyth '''
 
''' Johnson v Smyth '''
*Thomas Johnson of Old Buckenham and Dorothie his wife. STAC 5/J3/28
 
 
*STAC 5/J3/28 - B - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Johnson v Thomas Smyth, Jacob Preston et Mary uxor, Robert Jolly, Thomas Haplye, John Pryor, Henry Bacon, William Preston, Thomas Mendham, Abraham Preston, Isaac Preston, Richard Lytleproude, Adam Page.  
 
*STAC 5/J3/28 - B - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Johnson v Thomas Smyth, Jacob Preston et Mary uxor, Robert Jolly, Thomas Haplye, John Pryor, Henry Bacon, William Preston, Thomas Mendham, Abraham Preston, Isaac Preston, Richard Lytleproude, Adam Page.  
*see also [[STAC Johnson]]
+
**Thomas Johnson of Old Buckenham and Dorothie his wife.
 +
**see also [[STAC Johnson]]
  
 
''' Jubye v Youngman '''
 
''' Jubye v Youngman '''
*Deposition of Thomas Youngman of Carleton Norfolk and others. STAC 5/J4/5
 
 
*STAC 5/J1/3 - B A - Mich 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jubye v Thomas Youngeman, William Jubye, John Sherwyn, William Yongeman
 
*STAC 5/J1/3 - B A - Mich 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jubye v Thomas Youngeman, William Jubye, John Sherwyn, William Yongeman
 
*STAC 5/J4/5 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jewbye v William Yongeman, William Jewbye
 
*STAC 5/J4/5 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jewbye v William Yongeman, William Jewbye
 +
**Deposition of Thomas Youngman of Carleton Norfolk and others.
 
*STAC 5/J15/33 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jewbie v Thomas Youngman, William Youngman, William Jewbie
 
*STAC 5/J15/33 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jewbie v Thomas Youngman, William Youngman, William Jewbie
*see also  [[STAC Jubey]]  
+
**see also  [[STAC Jubey]]  
 +
 
 +
''' K '''
  
 
''' Killingtree v Pell '''
 
''' Killingtree v Pell '''
*Wm Killingtree mayor of your highness town of Kings Lynne in the county of Norfolk. STAC 5/K1/3
 
 
*STAC 5/K1/3 - B A Rn - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Killingtree, Robert Jervis, John Grigby, George Baker, Francis Shaxton, Thomas Overend v John Pell, Geofery Pell, Valentine Pell, Thomas Blesbie, Henry Violet, William Woolman, Richard Walters, Thomas Maye, Christopher Fisher, Robert Hulliard, Thomas Fowell, Thomas Haughton
 
*STAC 5/K1/3 - B A Rn - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Killingtree, Robert Jervis, John Grigby, George Baker, Francis Shaxton, Thomas Overend v John Pell, Geofery Pell, Valentine Pell, Thomas Blesbie, Henry Violet, William Woolman, Richard Walters, Thomas Maye, Christopher Fisher, Robert Hulliard, Thomas Fowell, Thomas Haughton
 +
**Wm Killingtree mayor of your highness town of Kings Lynne in the county of Norfolk.
 
*STAC 5/K8/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - The Mayor of Kings Lynn  v John Pell Jeffrey Pell, Christopher Fisher et al
 
*STAC 5/K8/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - The Mayor of Kings Lynn  v John Pell Jeffrey Pell, Christopher Fisher et al
*see also [[STAC Killingtree]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Killingtree]]  
  
 
''' Knyvett v Dixon '''
 
''' Knyvett v Dixon '''
*Depositions taken in Norwich. STAC 5/K4/34
+
*STAC 5/K8/32 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
*STAC 5/K8/32 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Thomas Knyvett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
+
*STAC 5/K5/30 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knivett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
*STAC 5/K5/30 - I D - 24 Eliz - Thomas Knivett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
+
 
*STAC 5/K4/34 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Richard Ringwood, Ralph Dixon et al
 
*STAC 5/K4/34 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Richard Ringwood, Ralph Dixon et al
*see also [[STAC Knivett]]
+
**Depositions taken in Norwich.
 +
**see also [[STAC Knivett]]
  
''' Knyvett v Burgess and Ryder '''
+
''' Knyvett v Booty '''
*Sir Thomas Knivett of Asshwelthorpe Hall Norfolk. STAC 5/K2/8
+
*STAC 5/K1/36 - B A Rn Rr C I D - Mich 32/33 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knivett v John Gallard, John Bootie, Stephen Whitting et al
 +
*STAC 5/K3/5 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v Thomas Burgess, John Burgess et al
 +
*STAC 5/K6/34 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knevett v John Booties Sr, William Ryder
 +
**see also [[STAC Knivett]]
 +
 
 +
''' Knyvett v Booty '''
 
*STAC 5/K2/8 - B A I D - Easter 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knivett v John Botye, John Burge Jr, William Rider, Robert Keene, George Browne
 
*STAC 5/K2/8 - B A I D - Easter 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knivett v John Botye, John Burge Jr, William Rider, Robert Keene, George Browne
*STAC 5/K3/5 - I D - 32 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v Thomas Burgess, John Burgess et al
+
**Sir Thomas Knivett of Asshwelthorpe Hall Norfolk.
*STAC 5/K7/12 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burghe, William Rider et al
+
*STAC 5/K7/12 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burghe, William Rider et al
*STAC 5/K14/32 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burgess, William Ryder et al
+
*STAC 5/K14/32 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burgess, William Ryder et al
*STAC 5/K6/34 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knevett v John Booties Sr, William Ryder
+
**see also [[STAC Knivett]]
*see also [[STAC Knivett]]
+
 
*
+
 
''' L '''  
 
''' L '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' Leake v Emerson'''
 +
*STAC 5/L18/6 - B A I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Leake v John Emerson, Thomas Claxton et al
 +
**Wm Leake of Hardingham, Norfolk. Lease of a messuage called Hewks in Swithins Street, Hardingham.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Leake]] for another possible reference
 +
 
 +
''' M '''
 +
 
 
''' Marsham v Brampton '''
 
''' Marsham v Brampton '''
 
*STAC 5/M13/13 - B A - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - The inhabitants of the town of Marsham v James Brampton, William Gedney et al
 
*STAC 5/M13/13 - B A - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - The inhabitants of the town of Marsham v James Brampton, William Gedney et al
*see also [[STAC Marsham]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Marsham]]  
*
+
 
 
''' N '''  
 
''' N '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' Nynge v Paston '''
 +
*STAC 5/N5/25 - B - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Nynge v Sir William Paston et al
 +
*STAC 5/N13/5 - A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Nynge v Sir William Paston
 +
*STAC 5/N4/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Nides v Sir William Paston, Godfrey Pendleton et al
 +
*STAC 5/N6/28 - C I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Ninge v Sir William Paston, Godfrey Pendleton et al
 +
**Interrs refer to riot & attack on parish church & parsonage of Knapton (no county). Deponents from Knapton, Paston, Stokesby & Cromer [Norfolk].(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/N15/40 - Rn Rr - - Norfolk - Edward Nynge v Godfrye Pendleton, Lawrence Bond et al
 +
*STAC 5/N3/32 - A Rn - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Nynge v Giles Skeete, Thomas Woodrowe et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Ninge]]
 +
 
 
''' O '''  
 
''' O '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' Oldman v Paston '''
 +
*STAC 5/O7/21 - B A Rn - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - John Oldman v Sir William Paston, Thomas Jermy, Robert Cooper et al
 +
**John Oldman of the City of Norwich, fisherman. Rights to fish from the 3 rivers leading to Yarmouth & especially for eels & elvets. Outlines the jurisdictions of the various owners of fishing on the 3 rivers.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/O8/11 - B A C - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - John Oldman v Sir William Paston, Robert Cooper et al
 +
*STAC 5/O8/23 - I D - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - John Oldman v John Punnett, William Lovelytch et al.
 +
*STAC 5/O5/23 - I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - John Oldman v Sir William Paston et al.
 +
**see also [[STAC Oldman]]
 +
 
 +
''' P '''
 +
 
 
''' Parfrey v Stokes '''
 
''' Parfrey v Stokes '''
*TNA Note: Wimbotsham: Tithe corn. STAC 7/14/18
 
 
*STAC 5/P46/39 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes et al
 
*STAC 5/P46/39 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes et al
 
*STAC 5/P53/17 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes
 
*STAC 5/P53/17 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes
Line 345: Line 723:
 
*STAC 5/P37/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes, Christopher Stokes
 
*STAC 5/P37/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes, Christopher Stokes
 
*STAC 7/14/18 - - - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes et al
 
*STAC 7/14/18 - - - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes et al
*see also [[STAC Purefey]]  
+
**TNA Note: Wimbotsham: Tithe corn.
*
+
**see also [[STAC Purefey]]  
 +
 
 +
''' Peter v Fisher '''
 +
*STAC 5/P4/6 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 32 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v James Fisher, Thomas Carter, Francis Holle
 +
*STAC 5/P17/8 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v James Fisher, Thomas Carter
 +
*STAC 5/P38/39 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v Francis Holle et al
 +
*STAC 5/P8/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v Thomas Carter, James Fisher, Francis Holle
 +
**Deponents: George Weber aged 23, George Bowgen gent aged 68, Richard Tolye aged 44, Christian Smith aged 22, Johan the wife of Edward Wyer aged 40 all of Norwich Norfolk. 
 +
*STAC 5/P39/32 - I - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v Thomas Carter, James Fysher
 +
*STAC 5/P40/27 - I D - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v Thomas Clarke
 +
**see also [[STAC Peter]]
 +
 
 
''' Q '''  
 
''' Q '''  
*
+
 
''' Reade v Grren and Britton '''  
+
''' R '''
*TNA Note: Forgery of a writ removing a suit to Westminster from the manorial court of Gimingham. STAC 7/5/4
+
 
 +
''' Ragland v Yelverton '''
 +
*STAC 5/R43/2 - B - - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton, Thomas Gybbon et al
 +
**Bill of Sir Thomas Ragland of Wallington co Norfolk. Dame Anne his wife deceased was sometime wife of Christopher Conysby Esquire deceased.
 +
Ragland owed Wallingford Hall for 16 years since his wife’s death and before that in her right. He was away on business in Glamorgan. William Yelvirston Esq of Rowgham [Rougham] co Norfolk, Thomas Gybbon esq of Lynne co Norfolk, Edward Waters gent of Lynne co Norfolk, Edmond Waters of Lynne co Norfolk, Thomas Might of Flycham [Flitcham] Norfolk Henry Valenger of Lynne gents and John Dalderby of Rowgham yeoman. 20 armed persons.
 +
*STAC 5/R32/24 - B A Rn Rr - 6 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton, Edward Waters et al
 +
*STAC 5/R41/27 - I D - 7 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Ragland]]
 +
 
 +
''' Ramsay v Fawcett '''
 +
*STAC 5/R1/27 - B - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsay v William Faucet
 +
**John Ramsey of the City of Norwich merchant.
 +
*STAC 5/R4/7 - A Rn Rr - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsay v William Fawcett
 +
*STAC 5/R5/20 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsey v William Fawcett
 +
**see also [[STAC Ramsay]]
 +
 
 +
''' Reade v Adamson '''  
 +
*STAC 5/R28/21 - B A Rn - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - William Read, William Bowton v John Adamson, Robert Olyver
 +
**Depositions of John Adamson clerk vicar of Gooderstone co Norfolk and Robert Oliver of Hilb. . .  co Norfolk, shepherd. In re a debt due to be paid at the parsonage in Gooderstone.
 +
*STAC 5/R43/14 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - William Rede, William Bowton v John Adamson, Robert Oliver (includes STAC 5/B14/3)
 +
**see also [[STAC Read]]
 +
 
 +
''' Reade v Green and Britton '''
 
*STAC 5/R35/17 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Humfry Britton
 
*STAC 5/R35/17 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Humfry Britton
 
*STAC 7/5/4 - - - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Thomas Grene, Humphrey Bretten
 
*STAC 7/5/4 - - - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Thomas Grene, Humphrey Bretten
*see also [[STAC Read]]
+
**TNA Note: Forgery of a writ removing a suit to Westminster from the manorial court of Gimingham.
 +
**see also [[STAC Read]]
 +
 
 +
''' Rigdon v Constable '''
 +
*STAC 5/R1/32 - B - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - William Rigdon, Dame Eleonor Buck v Robert Constable, William Taylor et al
 +
**Bill of Wm Rigdon esq and Dame Ellinor Buck his wife, late wife of Sir John Buck knight deceased. Exhibited her bill in Star Chamber by the name of Lady Eleanor Buck widow.  Deceit in the purchase of wool.
 +
**see also [[STAC Rigdon]]
  
 
''' Rosse v Shinkwin '''  
 
''' Rosse v Shinkwin '''  
*Interrogatories by Rosse to Shinckwyn. Depositions of Firnun Shinkwyn of Etedeareham, Norfolk, husbandman. In re land at Waton Co. Norfolk. John Neave of Graies Inn house and grounds in Weston, Norfolk Thomas Green of the parish of St Buttalls within the liberties of Smithfield saylemaker. Nicholas Hellwys of Weston,  Norfolk. John Jackson of the parish of St Buttolls without Allgate, London.  John Croke servant to Thomas Wood of the parish of St Buttalls without Allgate Scrivener. STAC 5/R1/21
+
*STAC 5/R30/6 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmond Shinkvyne
*STAC 5/R30/6 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Robert Rosse v Edmond Shinkvyne
+
*STAC 5/R18/13 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkwyne
*STAC 5/R18/13 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkwyne
+
*STAC 5/R9/24 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkquyne
*STAC 5/R9/24 - I D - 42 Eliz - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkquyne
+
*STAC 5/R24/15 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Ross v Edmund Shinquin
*STAC 5/R24/15 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Robert Ross v Edmund Shinquin
+
 
*STAC 5/R1/21 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinckwin  
 
*STAC 5/R1/21 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinckwin  
*see also [[STAC Rosse]]
+
**Interrogatories by Rosse to Shinckwyn. Depositions of Firnun Shinkwyn of Etedeareham, Norfolk, husbandman. In re land at Waton Co. Norfolk. John Neave of Graies Inn house and grounds in Weston, Norfolk Thomas Green of the parish of St Buttalls within the liberties of Smithfield saylemaker. Nicholas Hellwys of Weston,  Norfolk. John Jackson of the parish of St Buttolls without Allgate, London.  John Croke servant to Thomas Wood of the parish of St Buttalls without Allgate Scrivener.
 +
**see also [[STAC Rosse]]
 +
 
 +
''' Russe v Franklin '''
 +
*STAC 5/R40/7 - B A Rn C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Russe v Robert Franklin
 +
*STAC 5/R43/10 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Russe v Robert Francklin
 +
**Interrogatories on behalf of Thomas Russe. Deposition of Robert Frankling of the city of Norwich draper. Interrogatories on behalf of Robert Frankling deft. Deposition of Philip Chapman of London gent, Attorney of Common Pleas. Interrogatories to be put to the Bishop of the Isle of Man. Depostiion of the Bishop of the Isle of Man.
 +
**see also [[STAC Russe]]
 +
 
 +
''' S '''
  
 
''' Smith v Woodhouse '''  
 
''' Smith v Woodhouse '''  
*Int (only a scrap): Whether in or about the 17 day of the moneth of Februarie in the 38 yeare of her majesties said raigne were you made acquainted or did you know that the pl was then to purchase of Sir Henrie and Sir William Woodhouse knights the late dissolved monastery of Bromholme . . . (Bromholm Priory). Dep: primus die decembr Anno 42 Eliz. Thomas Woodehowse of Ellingham co Norfolk gent aged 34 years. STAC 5/S1/15
+
*STAC 5/S43/20 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse  
*STAC 5/S43/20 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse  
+
*STAC 5/S30/7 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
*STAC 5/S30/7 - I D - 40 Eliz - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
+
*STAC 5/S37/21 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smythe v Sir Henry Woodhouse
*STAC 5/S37/21 - Rn - 41 Eliz - John Smythe v Sir Henry Woodhouse
+
*STAC 5/S57/22 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse
*STAC 5/S57/22 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse
+
*STAC 5/S14/3 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
*STAC 5/S14/3 - I D - 42 Eliz - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
+
 
*STAC 5/S1/15 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smyth v Sir Henry Woodhouse
 
*STAC 5/S1/15 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smyth v Sir Henry Woodhouse
*STAC 5/S54/21 - I D - 43 Eliz - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse
+
**Int (only a scrap): Whether in or about the 17 day of the moneth of Februarie in the 38 yeare of her majesties said raigne were you made acquainted or did you know that the pl was then to purchase of Sir Henrie and Sir William Woodhouse knights the late dissolved monastery of Bromholme . . . (Bromholm Priory). Dep: primus die decembr Anno 42 Eliz. Thomas Woodehowse of Ellingham co Norfolk gent aged 34 years.
*see also [[STAC Smith, J]]
+
*STAC 5/S54/21 - I D - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse
 +
**see also [[STAC Smith, J]]
 +
 
 +
''' Snell v Body '''
 +
*STAC 5/S37/28 - B A Dr I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Snell, James Hargrave v Edward Body, John Smith et al
 +
**Case Book Report [[STAC 5/S37/28r]]
 +
*STAC 5/S17/28 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Snell, James Hargrave v Edward Bedell et al
 +
**Interrs refer to Edward Bodye of London, clothworker & common informer, and to a complaint to the Exchequer accusing the current complts (Snell & Hargrave) of engrossing corn & butter. Deponent from Norfolk.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/S13/11 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Snell, James Hargrave v Edward Bodye et al
 +
**Interrs refer to demise of land at West Wretham, Norfolk, to cause brought at Exchequer by the information of Edward Bodie, and to whether Edward Bodie had ever procured money by making threatening speeches.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Snell]]
  
 
''' Sporeley v Makender '''
 
''' Sporeley v Makender '''
*TNA Note: Wolverton and Lynn: Forcible dispute as to gathering mussels, and false imprisonment. STAC 7/5/15
+
*STAC 5/W16/28 - I D - 1 Eliz - Lincolnshire, Norfolk - Inhabitants of Woolverton [?Wolfreton] v Inhabitants of Lynn
*STAC 5/W16/28 - I D - 1 Eliz - Inhabitants of Woolverton v Inhabitants of Lynn
+
*STAC 7/5/15 - - - Lincolnshire, Norfolk - Roger Sporeley, Alexander Tebye, John Geyges et al inhabitants of Wolverton v John Makender, Ralph Downes, Edward Andrye, Thomas Ladyman et al
*STAC 7/5/15 - - - Lincolnshire - Roger Sporeley, Alexander Tebye, John Geyges et al inhabitants of Wolverton v John Makender, Ralph Downes, Edward Andrye, Thomas Ladyman et al
+
**TNA Note: Wolverton and Lynn: Forcible dispute as to gathering mussels, and false imprisonment.
*see also [[STAC Wolverton]] and see also [[STAC Sporeley]]
+
**see also [[STAC Wolverton]] and see also [[STAC Sporeley]]
 +
 
 +
''' Stutville v Chapman '''
 +
*STAC 5/S1/36 - B A - Hil 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Stutvile v Nicholas Chapman, Robert Sylvester, Robert Gowche
 +
**Great Melton, Norfolk. Lands of Robert Downes confiscated for recusancy.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/S72/15 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Stuteville v Nicholas Chapman, Robert Silvester et al
 +
*STAC 5/S22/9 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Stuteville v Richard Chapman, Robert Silvester et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Stutville]]
 +
 
 +
''' T '''
 +
 
 +
''' Taverner v Crumwell '''
 +
*STAC 5/T11/3 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - James Taverner v Thomas Crumwell, Thomas Wigmore et al
 +
**North Elmham, Norfolk. Referenced in [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=G6Jm4keX1t0C "Custom Improvement and Anti-Improvement in Early Modern Britain"] edited by Richard W. Hoyle, which also refers to related Chancery cases. See also [[STAC Cromwell]] - STAC 5/T11/3
 +
*STAC 5/T22/9 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - James Taverner v Thomas Crumwell et al
 +
*STAC 5/T25/8 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - James Taverner v Thomas Crumwell
 +
**see also [[STAC Taverner]]
  
 
''' Taverner v Thompson '''
 
''' Taverner v Thompson '''
*STAC 7/15/44 - TNA Note: Perjury in the Exchequer on behalf of Lord Cromwell, in a suit for the manors of North Elmham and Beetley. Roger Taverner, deputy surveyor of the Queen's woods
+
*STAC 5/T35/30 - B A - 16 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Thomas Lusher, Margaret Thompson et al
*STAC 5/T35/30 - B A - 16 Eliz - Roger Taverner v Thomas Lusher, Margaret Thompson et al
+
 
*STAC 7/15/44 - - - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Margery Tompson et al
 
*STAC 7/15/44 - - - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Margery Tompson et al
*see also [[STAC Taverner]]
+
**TNA Note: Perjury in the Exchequer on behalf of Lord Cromwell, in a suit for the manors of North Elmham and Beetley. Roger Taverner, deputy surveyor of the Queen's woods.
 +
**see also [[STAC Taverner]]
  
 
''' Thetford Corporation v Bassingwaite '''
 
''' Thetford Corporation v Bassingwaite '''
 
*STAC 5/T37/37 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Mayor and Burgesses of Thetford v John Bassingwayte, Antony Freere et al
 
*STAC 5/T37/37 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Mayor and Burgesses of Thetford v John Bassingwayte, Antony Freere et al
*see also [[STAC Thetford]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Thetford]]
 +
 
 +
''' Townsend v Worth '''
 +
*STAC 5/T3/11 - B A - Easter 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Dame Jane Townsend v Ambrose Worth et uxor, Robert Worth Sr, Robert Worth Jr, Thomas Whiskard et al 
 +
*STAC 5/T26/28 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Jane Townsend v Ambrose Worth, Robert Worth
 +
**see also [[STAC Townshend]]
 +
 
 +
''' Tymperley v Fowle '''
 +
*STAC 5/T22/19 - B A Rn - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Raffe Fowle, Launcelott Bell
 +
*STAC 5/T26/22 - I D - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Launcelot Bell, Ralph Fowle
 +
*STAC 5/T24/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Raffe Fowle
 +
*STAC 5/T15/38 - I D - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Ralph Fowle et al
 +
*STAC 5/T9/40 - I - - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Ralph Fowle et al
 +
**Interrs refer to assault, and to perjury at Norwich Assizes.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/T39/7 - I - - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Raffe Fowle, Martin Cobbes et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Timperley]]
  
 
''' Tymperley v Themilthorpe '''
 
''' Tymperley v Themilthorpe '''
*TNA Note: Will of Bartram Themilthorpe of Worstead. STAC 7/7/30
+
*STAC 5/T17/29 - Rn  - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Tympley v Thomas Thinilthorpe
*STAC 5/T17/29 - Rn  - 38 Eliz - Henry Tympley v Thomas Thinilthorpe
+
 
*STAC 7/7/30 - - - Norfolk - Henry Tymperley, v Thomas Themilthorpe, John Potter
 
*STAC 7/7/30 - - - Norfolk - Henry Tymperley, v Thomas Themilthorpe, John Potter
*see also [[STAC Timperley]]  
+
**TNA Note: Will of Bartram Themilthorpe of Worstead.
 +
**see also [[STAC Timperley]]  
  
 
''' Trindle v Woodhouse '''
 
''' Trindle v Woodhouse '''
*TNA Note: Carlton etc: Tenancy in first deft's manor. STAC 7/15/50
+
*STAC 5/T34/31 - B - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Trundell, Thomas Trundell v Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
*STAC 5/T34/31 - B - 22 Eliz - Agnes Trundell, Thomas Trundell v Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
+
*STAC 5/T26/5 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Tryndle, Thomas Tryndle v Sir Roger Woodhouse
*STAC 5/T26/5 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Agnes Tryndle, Thomas Tryndle v Sir Roger Woodhouse
+
*STAC 5/T18/27 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Tryndell, Thomas Tryndell v Sir Roger Woodehouse, Henry Blake
*STAC 5/T18/27 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Agnes Tryndell, Thomas Tryndell v Sir Roger Woodehouse, Henry Blake
+
*STAC 5/T13/40 - I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tryndell et uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
*STAC 5/T13/40 - I D - 23 Eliz - Thomas Tryndell et uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
+
 
*STAC 7/15/50 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Trundell, et Agnes uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
 
*STAC 7/15/50 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Trundell, et Agnes uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
*see also [[STAC Trindle]]  
+
**TNA Note: Carlton etc: Tenancy in first deft's manor - STAC 7/15/50
*
+
**see also [[STAC Trindle]]  
 +
 
 
''' UV '''  
 
''' UV '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' W '''
 +
 
 
''' Whitney v Gest '''
 
''' Whitney v Gest '''
*Thetford, Norfolk. Robert Whitney, Gent. Interrogatories of John Gest of Thetford, Norfolk and William Tompson of Thetford, shoemaker. STAC 5/W56/39
+
*STAC 5/W32/20 - B - - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v John Geste, William Tompson et al
*STAC 5/W32/20 - B - - Robert Whitney v John Geste, William Tompson et al
+
 
*STAC 5/W56/39 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v Lawrence Fytt, William Thompson
 
*STAC 5/W56/39 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v Lawrence Fytt, William Thompson
*STAC 5/W29/1 - A Rn C I D - 29 Eliz - Robert Whitney v William Thompson, Lawrence Fytt et al
+
**Thetford, Norfolk. Robert Whitney, Gent. Interrogatories of John Gest of Thetford, Norfolk and William Tompson of Thetford, shoemaker.
*see also [[STAC Whitney]]  
+
*STAC 5/W29/1 - A Rn C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v William Thompson, Lawrence Fytt et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Whitney]]
 +
 
 +
''' Winchester College Oxford v Palmer '''
 +
*STAC 5/C64/14 - B A C - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Martin Culpepper, The Scholars of St Mary's College of WInchester in Oxford (New College) v Nicholas Palmer, Francis Peerson et al
 +
**Martyn Culpeper, warden of St Mary's College of Winchester in Oxford & the scholars of said college. Manors of Witchingham, Longvile & Weston Longvile, Norfolk. Stopping up of a cut used to drain flood water and to supply water to a mill.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/W22/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Winchester College Oxford v Nicholas Palmer, John Palmer, Francis Peirson et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Oxford U]]
 +
 
 +
''' Woodhouse v Bate '''
 +
*STAC 5/W74/38 - B - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Richard Batt
 +
*STAC 5/W21/8 - B A Rn C I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Richard Bate, Thomas Owtlawe
 +
*STAC 5/W6/4 - B A Rn Rr C - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Richard Bate
 +
**Roger Woodhouse of Kimberley Norfolk esquire v Richard Bate of Norwich Alderman. Connection with a case concerning Henry Knevett son of Sir Thomas Knevett and the court of wards and liveries
 +
*STAC 5/W78/5 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Owtelawe
 +
*STAC 5/W71/26 - A - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Outlawe
 +
**see also [[STAC Woodhouse]]
 +
 
 +
''' Woodhouse v Grant '''
 +
*STAC 5/W79/12 - B - - Norfolk - Henry Woodhouse v Cristopher Grant, Thomas Grave et al
 +
*STAC 5/W27/11 - A Rn I D - 18 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Woodhouse v Christopher Graunte, John Pell et
 +
*STAC 5/W13/17 - I D - 18 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Woodhouse v Christopher Grante
 +
*STAC 5/W56/14 - I D - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Woodhouse v John Pell, John Grave et al
 +
*STAC 5/W58/12 - C I D - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Woodehouse v Cristopher Graunte, John Pell et al
 +
*STAC 5/W61/16 - I D - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Woodehouse v Cristopher Traunt, Richard Whitworth et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Woodhouse]]
  
 
''' Woodhouse v Kett '''
 
''' Woodhouse v Kett '''
*TNA Note: Mileham and Beeston: Maintenance of a drain and bridge on the manor, common of pasture. STAC 7/16/22
+
*STAC 5/W22/13 - B A - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhowse v Valentine Kett
*STAC 5/W22/13 - B A - 17 Eliz - Roger Woodhowse v Valentine Kett
+
 
*STAC 7/16/22 - - - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Richard Kett, Hilary Baly et al  
 
*STAC 7/16/22 - - - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Richard Kett, Hilary Baly et al  
 +
**TNA Note: Mileham and Beeston: Maintenance of a drain and bridge on the manor, common of pasture.
 
*STAC 5/W3/16 - B A Rn C I D - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Knyght, Valentine Knyght alias Kett, John Nevell, William Chace, Nicholas Banister et al
 
*STAC 5/W3/16 - B A Rn C I D - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Knyght, Valentine Knyght alias Kett, John Nevell, William Chace, Nicholas Banister et al
*STAC 5/W16/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Valentine Kett
+
**Case Book Report [[STAC 5/W3/16r]]
*STAC 5/W18/14 - Rn - 23 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Botie, John Nevell et al
+
*STAC 5/W16/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Valentine Kett
*STAC 5/W4/26 - B A Rr - Trin 23 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Henry Knevett, Edmund Knevett, Anthony Knevett, John Neville, Richard Watts, William Guilder et al
+
*STAC 5/W18/14 - Rn - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Botie, John Nevell et al
*see also [[STAC Woodhouse]]  
+
*STAC 5/W4/26 - B A Rr - Trin 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Henry Knevett, Edmund Knevett, Anthony Knevett, John Neville, Richard Watts, William Guilder et al
*
+
**see also [[STAC Woodhouse]]  
 +
 
 
''' X '''  
 
''' X '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' Y '''
 +
 
 
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Bettys '''
 
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Bettys '''
 
*STAC 5/Y2/4 - B - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Jurats and Burgesses of Yarmouth v Thomas Bettys, John Pidgeon et al
 
*STAC 5/Y2/4 - B - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Jurats and Burgesses of Yarmouth v Thomas Bettys, John Pidgeon et al
*see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
+
**see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
  
 
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Gunvile '''
 
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Gunvile '''
*STAC 5/B103/16 - B A Rn - 12 Eliz - John Burforth, Ambrose Bullard v Henry Gunoyle et al  
+
*STAC 5/B103/16 - B A Rn - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - John Burforth, Ambrose Bullard v Henry Gunoyle et al  
 
*STAC 5/Y2/11 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvile et al
 
*STAC 5/Y2/11 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvile et al
 
*STAC 5/Y4/2 - Rn - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvyle
 
*STAC 5/Y4/2 - Rn - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvyle
*STAC 5/U3/2 - C I D - 13 Eliz - John Uffar, Ambrose Bullward v Henry Gunvyle, Robert Candler et al
+
*STAC 5/U3/2 - C I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - John Uffar, Ambrose Bullward v Henry Gunvyle, Robert Candler et al
*see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
+
**see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
  
 
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Wylde '''
 
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Wylde '''
 
*STAC 5/Y1/14 - B Dr - Hil 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Comomalty of Yarmouth, v William Wylde, John Wylde, Nathaniell Arnold, Matthew Fullgood, Robert Ward et al
 
*STAC 5/Y1/14 - B Dr - Hil 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Comomalty of Yarmouth, v William Wylde, John Wylde, Nathaniell Arnold, Matthew Fullgood, Robert Ward et al
*see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
+
**see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
*
+
 
 
''' Z '''  
 
''' Z '''  
*
+
 
 
''' Almoner '''
 
''' Almoner '''
  
 
''' Almoner v Blundeville '''
 
''' Almoner v Blundeville '''
*Andrew Green late of Catfeild Norfolk. Hanged himself. felo de se. STAC 5/A2/32
 
 
*STAC 5/A2/32 - B A - Hil 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v John Blundeville et uxor
 
*STAC 5/A2/32 - B A - Hil 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v John Blundeville et uxor
*see also [[STAC Blundeville]]
+
**Andrew Green late of Catfeild Norfolk. Hanged himself. felo de se.
 +
**see also [[STAC Blundeville]]
 +
 
 +
‘''Almoner Foster '''
 +
*STAC 5/A59/10 - B - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v Thomas Foster, Henry Brigg
 +
*STAC 5/A59/10 - In re Thomas Brigges of Hingham in county Norfolk felo de se
 +
**see also [[STAC Foster Forster]]
  
 
‘’' Almoner v Goldman '''
 
‘’' Almoner v Goldman '''
*One Steven Meade late of Rewton or Beston neare unto the sea side in Norfolk. felo de se. STAC 5/A3/36
 
 
*STAC 5/A3/36 - B A - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v Robert Goldman  
 
*STAC 5/A3/36 - B A - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v Robert Goldman  
*see also [[STAC Goldman]]  
+
**One Steven Meade late of Rewton or Beston neare unto the sea side in Norfolk. felo de se.
 +
**see also [[STAC Goldman]]  
  
 
''' Almoner v Hall '''
 
''' Almoner v Hall '''
*Henry Shrympling and Adame Elger late of Tyrinton St Jones [Terrington St Johns] in Norfolk. both felo de se. STAC 5/A3/34
 
 
*STAC 5/A3/34 - B -  - Norfolk - Almoner v William Hall, Francis Leggate
 
*STAC 5/A3/34 - B -  - Norfolk - Almoner v William Hall, Francis Leggate
*see also [[STAC Hall]]
+
**Henry Shrympling and Adame Elger late of Tyrinton St Jones [Terrington St Johns] in Norfolk. both felo de se.
 +
**see also [[STAC Hall]]
  
 
''' Almoner v Lowcock '''
 
''' Almoner v Lowcock '''
 
*STAC 5/A6/8 - B - 39 Eliz - Derbyshire, Norfolk - Almoner v William Lowecock
 
*STAC 5/A6/8 - B - 39 Eliz - Derbyshire, Norfolk - Almoner v William Lowecock
*Edmond Stephenson late of Dronfield co Derby gent felo de se. Drowned himself in Norfolk in a river near Norwich. STAC 5/A6/8
+
**Edmond Stephenson late of Dronfield co Derby gent felo de se. Drowned himself in Norfolk in a river near Norwich.
*see also [[STAC Lowcock]]
+
**see also [[STAC Lowcock]] and [[STAC Harruppe]]
  
 
''' Almoner v Moore '''
 
''' Almoner v Moore '''
*STAC 7/1/10 - TNA Note: Hingham: Goods of [blank] Forde, suicide
+
*STAC 7/1/10 - B - - Norfolk - Almoner (Edmund, bishop of Rochester) v Thomas Moore  
*STAC 7/1/10 - - - Norfolk - Almoner (Edmund, bishop of Rochester) v Thomas Moore  
+
**TNA Note: Hingham: Goods of [blank] Forde, suicide.
*see also [[STAC Moore]]
+
**see also [[STAC Moore]]
  
 
''' Almoner v Perryman '''
 
''' Almoner v Perryman '''
*Walter Vyncent late of Esson [? Easton] in Norfolk felo de se. STAC 5/A5/18
 
 
*STAC 5/A5/18 - B A - - Norfolk - Almoner v Hugh Perryman
 
*STAC 5/A5/18 - B A - - Norfolk - Almoner v Hugh Perryman
*see also [[STAC Perryman]]
+
**Walter Vyncent late of Esson [? Easton] in Norfolk felo de se.
 +
**see also [[STAC Perryman]]
  
 
''' Almoner v Pleasants '''
 
''' Almoner v Pleasants '''
*Bond by Richard Banges of Norwich to John Mingey of Norwich apothecary. STAC 5/A39/8
 
*Richard Banges of the City of Norwich tanner drowned himself, felo de se. STAC 5/A4/33
 
 
*STAC 5/A4/33 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Pleasants, William Harebrowne, John Mingey, John Howes  
 
*STAC 5/A4/33 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Pleasants, William Harebrowne, John Mingey, John Howes  
 +
**Richard Banges of the City of Norwich tanner drowned himself, felo de se.
 
*STAC 5/A39/8 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Plesaunce  
 
*STAC 5/A39/8 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Plesaunce  
*see also [[STAC Pleasants]]  
+
**Bond by Richard Banges of Norwich to John Mingey of Norwich apothecary.
 +
**see also [[STAC Pleasants]]  
  
 
''' Attorney General '''
 
''' Attorney General '''
Line 487: Line 986:
 
''' AG v Abrahan '''
 
''' AG v Abrahan '''
 
*STAC 5/A39/24 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Robert Abrahan
 
*STAC 5/A39/24 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Robert Abrahan
*see also [[STAC Abrahan]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Abrahan]]
 +
 
 +
''' AG v Bowler '''
 +
*STAC 5/A39/5 - B A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v James Bowler.
 +
**Transcription [[STAC 5/A39/5]]
 +
**Corruption in the levying of troops
 +
*STAC 5/A50/33 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v James Bowler
 +
**see also [[STAC Bowler]]
 +
 
 +
''' AG v Framingham '''
 +
*STAC 5/A47/10 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v George Framingham
 +
**Case Book Report [[STAC 5/A47/10r]]
 +
*STAC 5/A11/35 - A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v George Framyngham et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Framingham]]
  
 
''' AG v Fryer '''
 
''' AG v Fryer '''
*STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
+
*STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
*STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - AG v Anthony Fryer
+
*STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer
 +
**Thetford - Refusal of the Oath of Obedience
 
*STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford  
 
*STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford  
*STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - - AG v Anthony Frise  
+
*STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Frise  
*see also [[STAC Fryer]]
+
**see also [[STAC Fryer]]
 
+
''' AG v Gresham and Clere '''
+
*Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich). STAC 5/A32/39
+
*Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.
+
*STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Cleare
+
*STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
+
**Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General
+
**Answer of Edward Clere.
+
**Answer of Thomas Sego
+
**Demurrer of William Gressham
+
*STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al
+
*see also [[STAC Clere]]
+
  
 
''' AG v Gibson '''
 
''' AG v Gibson '''
*Norwich, Eight Answers. STAC 5/A32/30
 
 
*STAC 5/A32/30 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gibson et uxor, Judeth Wilson, John Thompson, John Beamond, Simon Davye et al  
 
*STAC 5/A32/30 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gibson et uxor, Judeth Wilson, John Thompson, John Beamond, Simon Davye et al  
*STAC 5/A26/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - AG v Margaret Gybson et al
+
**Norwich. Eight separate Answers.
*STAC 5/A19/32 - I -  - AG v Henry Gybson
+
*STAC 5/A26/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Margaret Gybson et al
*see also [[STAC Gibson]]
+
*STAC 5/A19/32 - I -  - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gybson
 +
**see also [[STAC Gibson]]
 +
 
 +
''' AG v Gresham and Clere '''
 +
*STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Cleare
 +
*STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
 +
**Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich).
 +
**Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.
 +
**Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General. Answer of Edward Clere. Answer of Thomas Sego. Demurrer of William Gressham
 +
*STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Clere]]
  
 
''' AG v Harward '''
 
''' AG v Harward '''
*In re Clement Herward late of Alborough in co Norfolk deceased. STAC 5/A39/2
 
*Account of Attorney General v Thomas Harward, Alborough, Norfolk (forgery 38 Eliz) in [https://archive.org/stream/cu31924069587255#page/n89/mode/2up Les reportes del cases in Camera Stellata, 1593 to 1609 from the original ms. of John Hawarde edited by William Paley Baildon Published 1894, p. 28 - 29 & 30]
 
 
*STAC 5/A25/28 - I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward et al
 
*STAC 5/A25/28 - I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward et al
 
*STAC 5/A39/2 - I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward
 
*STAC 5/A39/2 - I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward
 +
**In re Clement Herward late of Alborough in co Norfolk deceased.
 
*STAC 5/A32/8 - I D - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward et al
 
*STAC 5/A32/8 - I D - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward et al
 
*STAC 5/A48/38 - I D - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward
 
*STAC 5/A48/38 - I D - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward
 
*STAC 5/A41/5 - Rn - Mich 34/35 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harold alias Harward
 
*STAC 5/A41/5 - Rn - Mich 34/35 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harold alias Harward
 
*STAC 5/A40/27 - B A C I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward et uxor
 
*STAC 5/A40/27 - B A C I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Thomas Harward et uxor
*see also [[STAC Harward]]
+
**Account of Attorney General v Thomas Harward, Alborough, Norfolk (forgery 38 Eliz) in [https://archive.org/stream/cu31924069587255#page/n89/mode/2up Les reportes del cases in Camera Stellata, 1593 to 1609 from the original ms. of John Hawarde edited by William Paley Baildon Published 1894, p. 28 - 29 & 30]
 +
**see also [[STAC Harward]]
  
 
''' AG v Heveningham '''
 
''' AG v Heveningham '''
*Interrogatories to be ministered to Sir Arthur Heveningham knight on the part and behalf of HM. Imp did not the Lords of HM most hon PC about the one and thirty yeare of HM raygne direct ther letters to you Sir Arthur Heveningham, Sir Edward Cleer, Sir Robert Southwell knights, Thomas Farmore, William Rugge and Charles Cornwales esquires to examine and ende a cause betwene Thomas Thwayte of Hardingham in Norfolk esq & Richard Thwaites one of the younger sons of the said Thomas of the one parte and Antony Thwayte eldest son of the said Thomas & Francis the wife of the said Anthony on the other parte according to equitie etc. STAC 5/A6/25
+
*STAC 5/A6/25 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Sir Arthur Heveningham
*STAC 5/A6/25 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Sir Arthur Hevenham
+
**Interrogatories to be ministered to Sir Arthur Heveningham knight on the part and behalf of HM. Imp did not the Lords of HM most hon PC about the one and thirty yeare of HM raygne direct ther letters to you Sir Arthur Heveningham, Sir Edward Cleer, Sir Robert Southwell knights, Thomas Farmore, William Rugge and Charles Cornwales esquires to examine and ende a cause betwene Thomas Thwayte of Hardingham in Norfolk esq & Richard Thwaites one of the younger sons of the said Thomas of the one parte and Antony Thwayte eldest son of the said Thomas & Francis the wife of the said Anthony on the other parte according to equitie etc.  
*see also [[STAC Heveningham]]
+
**see also [[STAC Heveningham]]
 +
 
 +
''' AG v Jermyn '''
 +
*STAC 5/A57/31 - B A - - Norfolk - AG v Francis Jermyne, Richard Jones et al
 +
*STAC 5/A15/8 - I D - 8 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Francis Jermye et al
  
 
''' AG v Jermyn '''
 
''' AG v Jermyn '''
 
*STAC 5/A2/40 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmond Jermyn, Robert Bateman, Rowland Thompson, Thomas Worth et al
 
*STAC 5/A2/40 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmond Jermyn, Robert Bateman, Rowland Thompson, Thomas Worth et al
*STAC 5/A57/31 - B A - - AG v Francis Jermyne, Richard Jones et al
+
*STAC 5/A11/16 - A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmund Jermyn et al
*STAC 5/A15/8 - I D - 8 Eliz - AG v Francis Jermye et al
+
**see also [[STAC Jermyn]]
*STAC 5/A11/16 - A - 40 Eliz - AG v Edmund Jermyn et al
+
 
*see also [[STAC Jermyn]]
+
''' AG v Parker '''
 +
*STAC 5/A37/30 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Parker, Richard Witherley, James Lynne, John Sadde, John Pigeon, Robert Jeffryes
 +
**Bill. Mattishall co Norfolk. the defendants are men of very badd lewd riotous and uncyvill behavour. Answer of John Pigeon gent . Answer of Parker, Witherley and Sadd
 +
**see also [[STAC Parker]]
  
 
''' AG v Pigeon '''
 
''' AG v Pigeon '''
*Wymondham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A55/37
 
 
*STAC 5/A55/37 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon et al
 
*STAC 5/A55/37 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon et al
*STAC 5/A17/8 - Rn - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
+
**Wymondham, Norfolk - STAC 5/A55/37
*STAC 5/A22/29 - Rr - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
+
*STAC 5/A17/8 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
*STAC 5/A28/16 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, Richard Witherley, John Parker et al
+
*STAC 5/A22/29 - Rr - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
*see also [[STAC Pigeon]]  
+
*STAC 5/A28/16 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, Richard Witherley, John Parker et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Pigeon]]
 +
 
 +
''' AG v Pott '''
 +
*STAC 5/A55/20 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Philip Potte, John Potte, Emanuel Calland
 +
*STAC 5/A43/17 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Philip Pott et al
 +
*STAC 5/A47/9 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Potte et al
 +
**Interrs ref Chancery proceedings re manors of Noers als Nothe and Mannington or Wolterton, and lands in Itringham, Norfolk.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Pott]]  
  
 
''' AG v Terrold '''
 
''' AG v Terrold '''
 
*STAC 5/A1/39 - A Rn C I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaits, Thomas Amides, William Terold
 
*STAC 5/A1/39 - A Rn C I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaits, Thomas Amides, William Terold
*STAC 5/A46/5 - C I D - 40 Eliz- AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaytes, Thomas Amyas et al
+
*STAC 5/A46/5 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaytes, Thomas Amyas et al
*STAC 7/17/55 - - - AG v William Terolde et al
+
*STAC 7/17/55 - - - Norfolk - AG v William Terolde et al
*see also [[STAC Terrold]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Terrold]]  
  
 
''' AG v Thwaites '''
 
''' AG v Thwaites '''
 
*STAC 5/A6/27 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Bridget Thwaits, Thomas Cooper, Robert Cooper
 
*STAC 5/A6/27 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Bridget Thwaits, Thomas Cooper, Robert Cooper
*Examinations taken at Hardingham co Norfolk 25 Sept 40 Eliz before Danyell Rieve DD, Martyn Sidley esq, Thomas Thetford esq [in the case] between William Terrold, Richard Thwaite et al Defs and Edward Cooke AG compl. Interrogatories to be ministered to Bridgett Thwaites widdowe Thomas Cooper yeoman, Robert Cooper yeoman on the part of William Terrold, Richard Thwaites and Thomas Amyas, three of the defs to the information of Edward Cooke AG. Depostion of Thomas Cowper of Depeham co Norfolk aged 60: that he hath heard that there were letters directed to certain knights and esquires in the said county from the lords of HM PC authorizing thaen therby to here and determine all matters of controversy that were then betwene Thomas Thwaites of Hardingham and Anthony his eldest sonne. STAC 5/A6/27
+
**Examinations taken at Hardingham co Norfolk 25 Sept 40 Eliz before Danyell Rieve DD, Martyn Sidley esq, Thomas Thetford esq [in the case] between William Terrold, Richard Thwaite et al Defs and Edward Cooke AG compl. Interrogatories to be ministered to Bridgett Thwaites widdowe Thomas Cooper yeoman, Robert Cooper yeoman on the part of William Terrold, Richard Thwaites and Thomas Amyas, three of the defs to the information of Edward Cooke AG. Depostion of Thomas Cowper of Depeham co Norfolk aged 60: that he hath heard that there were letters directed to certain knights and esquires in the said county from the lords of HM PC authorizing thaen therby to here and determine all matters of controversy that were then betwene Thomas Thwaites of Hardingham and Anthony his eldest sonne.
*see also [[STAC Thwaits]]
+
**see also [[STAC Thwaits]]
  
 
''' AG v Wharton '''
 
''' AG v Wharton '''
*Ingrossing of grain, many many answers including one by Robert Pooke citizen and aldermen of Norwich. STAC 5/A55/36
 
*STAC 5/A8/22 - I - 39 Eliz - AG v Martin Wharton, Thomas Norfor et al
 
 
*STAC 5/A55/36 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martyn Wharton et al  
 
*STAC 5/A55/36 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martyn Wharton et al  
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
+
*STAC 5/A8/22 - I - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martin Wharton, Thomas Norfor et al
 +
**Ingrossing of grain, many many answers including one by Robert Pooke citizen and aldermen of Norwich.
 +
**see also [[STAC Wharton]]
  
 
''' AG v Whitehand '''
 
''' AG v Whitehand '''
*TNA Note: Forgery of warrants and bonds. STAC 7/1/5
+
*STAC 7/1/5 - B A - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - AG (Edward Coke) v Ralph Whitehand, Edward Ralf
*STAC 5/A47/36 - I D - 44 Eliz - AG v Ralfe Whithand
+
**Bill date 6 Nov Anno 44 Eliz
*STAC 5/A44/14 - I D - 45 Eliz - AG v Raphe Whitehand, John Clybury
+
**TNA Note: Forgery of warrants and bonds.
*STAC 7/1/5 - - - Norfolk - AG (Edward Coke) v Ralph Whitehand, Edward Ralf
+
*STAC 5/A47/36 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Ralfe Whithand
*see also [[STAC Whitehand]]
+
*STAC 5/A44/14 - I D - 45 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Raphe Whitehand, John Clybury
 +
**see also [[STAC Whitehand]]
 +
 
 +
''' AG v Worlock '''
 +
*STAC 5/A47/27 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Worlock, Raph Mason, Thomas Berry
 +
**Raphe Mason & Thomas Berrye, Queen's messengers, sent with a warrant to Norfolk, to bring certain persons up to Lord Hunsdon. Inserted names of innocent parties and attempted to charge them to have their names removed.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Worlock]]  
 +
 
 +
<BR>
 +
''' Palmer's cumulative totals of Star Chamber fines preserved in the E159s ''' (rp)
 +
*TNA E159/367 Easter Term, 16 Elizabeth. Fine paid
 +
**From John Blofield de Cromer, Norf: £59 3s 4d.
 +
*TNA E159/375 Trinity Term, 20 Elizabeth. Fine paid
 +
**From Christofer Graunte de Lynne, Norf: £50.
 +
**From John Pell de Lynne, Norf: £66 13s 4d.
 +
**From John Smythe: £20.
 +
*TNA E159/377 Trinity Term, 21 Elizabeth. Fine paid
 +
**From Roger Woodhouse de Kymberley, Norf, knight: £10.
 +
**From the same Roger Woodhouse: 100 marks.
 +
**From Thome Love, servant to the same Roger: £3 6s 8d.
 +
**From Nicholas Pattrick de Carleton Rode, Norf: £3 6s 8d.
 +
**From Robert Jolly of Old Buckenham, Norf: £3 6s 8d.
 +
**From Thomas Cooper, servant to the same Roger: £3 6s 8d.
 +
**From William Wharton, servant to the same Roger: £3 6s 8d.
 +
**From William Mychell, servant to the same Roger: £3 6s 8d.
 +
**From Richard Pyle de Salton Rode, Norf: £3 6s 8d.
 +
**From Peter Reader de Buckenham: £3 6s 8d.
 +
**From Adam Barbour de Buckenham: £3 6s 8d.
 +
**From Samuel Carman de Thranston, Suff: £3 6s 8d.
 +
**From Thomas Wamtrell, servant to the same Roger: £3 6s 8d.
 +
*TNA E159/387 Easter Term, 26 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1584
 +
**From Robert Burwell de Wyndham, Norf: £50.
 +
**From John Kett de Wyndham, Norf; £10.
 +
**From John Smyth de Wyndham, Norf: £5
 +
*TNA E159/406 Michaelmas Term, 35-36 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1593
 +
**From William Frankelin de Rowlesby, Norf: £50.
 +
**From Thomas Eden de Marcham, Norf: £50.
 +
**From Anthony Eden de Marcham, Norf: £10.
 +
**From Bartholomew Eden de Marcham, Norf: £10.
 +
**From John Marche de Marcham, Norf: £10.
 +
*TNA E159/408 Michaelmas Term, 36-37 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1594
 +
**From Henry Rolff de ____, Norf: £10.
 +
**From Richard Cokey de Groton, Suff: £20.
 +
*TNA E159/410 Hilary Term, 38 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1596
 +
**From Thomas Harwood alias Hayward de Albrough, Norf, gent: £300.
 +
**From Thomas Funston de Windham, Norf: £40.
 +
**From John Hamond de Gelston, Norf: £40.
 +
**From John Botewright de Frisingfeld, Suff,yeoman: £20.
 +
**From Edward Cleere de Thetford, Norf, armiger: £20.
 +
**From John Browne de Porland, Norf, yeoman: £20.
 +
**From Thomas Segoe de Ailesham, Norf: £10.
 +
**From Edward Newarke de Ketteringham, Norf, yeoman: £10.
 +
**From John Freman de Shortesham, Norf: £5.
 +
**From Thomas Hayward of the City of Norwich, gent: £5.
 +
*TNA E159/411 Easter and Trinity Terms, 38 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1596
 +
**From Thomas Packe de Harleston, Norf, yeoman: £10.
 +
**From Richard Freer de Harleston, Norf, gent: 100 marks.
 +
**From Anthony Freer de Thetford, Norf, gent: £60.
 +
*TNA E159/412 Michaelmas Terms, 38-39 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1596
 +
**From Roger Hubbert de Northwoold, Norf, gent: 200 marks.
 +
*TNA E159/414 Michaelmas Term, 39-40 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1597
 +
**From Edmund Framlingham de Warham, Norf, yeoman: £100.
 +
**From Mathias Sotherton of Norwich, gent: 100 marks.
 +
**From Richard Whalle of the City of Norwich: 100 marks.
 +
**From William Peck de Fecenham, Norf, gent: £20.
 +
**From Thomas Bradfield de Mousley, Norf, yeoman: £10.
 +
**From Thomas Bowde de Paston, Norf, yeoman: £10.
 +
**From Daniel Shanck de Owbye, Norf, yeoman: £5.
 +
**From Robert Cubitt de Bradfeld, Norf, yeoman: £10.
 +
**From Edward Hilton de Lingwood, Norf, cleric: £20.
 +
**From William Shill de Framlingham, Suff, yeoman: £20.
 +
**From John Terrett de Wickham Market, Suff, yeoman: £20.
 +
**From Robert Borrett de Wilbye, Suff, yeoman: £20.
 +
*TNA E159/416 Hilary Term, 40 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1598
 +
**From Richard Westgate de Sething, Norf: £40.
 +
**From Edward Kirkham and Peter Baynes de le Stronde, Middx: £40.
 +
*TNA Trinity Term, 40 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1598
 +
**From Richard Wattes de Barforde, Norf: £40.
 +
**From John Page de Barforde, Norf: £40.
 +
*TNA E159/416 Michaelmas Term, 40-41 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1598
 +
**From Richard Astley de Thetforde, Norf, gent: £5.
 +
**From Anthony Freer de Thetforde, Norf, gent: £5.
 +
*TNA E159/417 Michaelmas Term, 40-41 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1598
 +
**From William Downinge de martham, Norf, gent: £30.
 +
*TNA E159/416 Hilary Term, 41 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1599
 +
**From Thomas Warner de Wynfarthing, Norf: £20.
 +
*TNA E159/418 Michaelmas Term, 41-42 Michaelmas. Fine Paid 1599
 +
**From Laurence Costerdyne de Tybenham, Norf: £50.
 +
**From Abraham Corker late of Tybenham, Norf: £50.
 +
**From William Seaman de Tybenham, Norf, clothier: £20.
 +
*TNA E159/420 Michaelmas Term, 42-43 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1600
 +
**From William Bennett de Suffield, Norf, cleric: £100.
 +
*TNA E159/421 Michaelmas Term, 42-43 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1600
 +
**From William Goodrycke de Ribston, Yorks, gent: £40.
 +
**From Drugo Asteley de Thetford, Norf, gent: £40.
 +
*TNA E159/421 Michaelmas Term, 43-44 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1601
 +
**From William Bennett de Carleton, Norf: £50.
 +
**From Thomas Bennett de Linge, Norf: £50.
 +
**From Richard Brigges de Carleton, Norf, carpenter: £10.
 +
**From Robert Isbells of New Buckingham, Norf: £10.
 +
**From William Bullytout de Carleton, Norf, yeoman: £10.
 +
**From Thomas Yongman de Carlton Rood, Norf, weaver and From Fide Youngman, wife of said Thomas Youngman: £15.
 +
**From Henry Spencer de Carleton, Norf, yeoman: £10.
 +
**From William Rumbold de Larling, Norf, husbandman: £5.
 +
**From Robert Pytman de Carleton, Norf, laborer: £5.
 +
**From Robert Sommer de Barneham Brome, Norf: £5.
 +
**From James Burden de Rowdham, Norf, yeoman: £5.
 +
**From Henry Catten de Disheywood, Norf, yeoman: £10.
 +
*TNA E159/421 Michaelmas Term, 43-44 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1601
 +
**From Stephen Baxter de Harleston, Norf, yeoman: £20.

Latest revision as of 14:37, 29 July 2019

Norfolk

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

A

Aldham v Harvey

  • STAC 5/A4/17 - B A - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Aldham v John Harvye, Anthony Bennyt, Thomas Hallyet et al
    • Wramplingham co Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/A16 /11 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Aldehn v John Harvy

Allen v Playford

  • STAC 5/A52/8 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allen v Henry Playford et al
    • Thomas Aleyn of Northrepps co Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/A7/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Aleyn v Henry Playforth et al, John Atkyns, William Perker et al

Allyson v Richman

  • STAC 5/A2/2 - B Dr - Easter 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allyson v Thomas Richman, George Thomson
    • Thomas Alyson of Aylesham co Norfolk.
    • see also STAC Allyson

Anguish v Nicholas

  • STAC 5/A47/8 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Eme Angwishe v Agnes Nicholas, John Rame et al
  • STAC 5/A53/14 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v Agnes Nicholas, Rame, John Craddock et al
  • STAC 5/A1/30 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v William Nicholas
    • Walsingham in the co of Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/A20 /2 - Rr - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Angus v Anne Nicholas, William Nicholas et al

Armiger v Whitney

  • STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
  • Robert Whitney a man of evil and lewd life and conversation - STAC 5/A2/4
    • Possibly Burnham and [King's] Lynne, Norfolk. (See Note which also suggests that STAC 5/A26/29 is related).
  • STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al

Armiger v Barber

  • STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al
    • William Arminger the elder of North Creake in Norfolk gentleman. In re the manor of Hillham in Holkham, Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v John Barber et al
  • STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
  • STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al

Artis v Ashill

  • STAC 5/A16/18 - B A Rn I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Antys v John Ashyll et al
  • STAC 5/A6/24 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill
    • John Ashill clerk def parson of Bodney co Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/A43/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
  • STAC 5/A24/4 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
  • STAC 5/A42/19 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artis v Robert Purdye, John Ashill

Aslack v Stone

  • STAC 5/A9/25 - I D - 1 Eliz - Norfolk - William Aslake v Richard Stone, Richard Rightwise et al
  • STAC 5/A9/25 - Destruction of a dyke on Holkham manor
    • see also STAC co Norfolk

B

Bacon v Ryall

  • STAC 5/B26/27 - B A - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - William Bacon, Elizabeth Bacon v William Ryall, John Dod

Baker v Prest

  • STAC 7/1/35 - B - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Baker v Robert Preste
    • A a scrap of Bill dated in verso Anno 27 Eliz
    • TNA Note: Rent of land in Walton granted by Sir Thomas Gresham - STAC 7/1/35
    • see also STAC Baker

Baldrey v Ward

  • STAC 5/B67/4 - B - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - John Baldrye v Margaret Warde,Thomas Warde, William Palmer
    • Theft of crop of peas. Rednall, Norfolk. John Baldrye v Thomas Warde of Rednall, tanner & Margery his wife; Anne Myddaye of Rednall, spinster; John Lawne & Wyllm Palmer of Southreps, yeoman.
    • see also STAC Baldrey

Barham v Roberts

  • STAC 5/B21/37 - B A - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Burham v John Roberts, Thomas Sewell et al
    • Thomas Burham of Foulden, Norfolk. Perjury at Norfolk Assizes. Action of trespass at Common Pleas. Lands in Foulden.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B95/18 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Burham v William Olyver, John Roberts et al

Barwick v Lovell

  • STAC 5/B7/36 - B A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwick v Philip Lovell et uxor, Elizabeth alias Great Bess his maid
  • STAC 5/B6/30 - B A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - William Berwick v Philip Lovell, Richard Costen
  • STAC 5/B103/30 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwick v Robert Costen
  • STAC 5/B97/40 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwicke v Philip Lovell et al
  • STAC 5/B2/16 - B A C I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Wiliiam Barwicke v Philip Lovell
    • Earlier that decade [1590s], a widow from Garboldisham (Norfolk) who was threatened with a subpoena, said ‘that before she wold testifie anie thinge eyter against [a local gentleman] or anie that belonged unto him, she wold be torne in peces [by] wyld horses’. STAC 5/B2/16, Thomas Barwick (deposition). Hillary Taylor, The price of the poor’s words: social relations and the economics of deposing for one’s ‘betters’ in early modern England., Economic History Review (2018) https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12773
    • A Norfolk gentleman who deposed for the complainant (also a gentleman) claimed that Elizabeth Costens had approached him and voluntarily confessed that she had ‘forsworne herselfe against [the complainant]’, before adding that she had been ‘drawne and persuaded soe to doe by . . . hir mistris’. - STAC 5/B2/16, Edward Barwick (deposition). Costen’s case suggests that there could be a gendered pressure involved in subornation: Costen herself was approached about testifying by her mistress, Mrs Lovell, and her husband was approached by Mr Lovell. However, the evidence does not permit a more thoroughgoing exploration of this issue. Hillary Taylor, The price of the poor’s words: social relations and the economics of deposing for one’s ‘betters’ in early modern England., Economic History Review (2018) https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12773
  • STAC 5/B18/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwicke v Philip Lovell
  • STAC 5/B55/40 - B A Dr C - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwick v Hellen Lovell, Elizabeth Coster
  • STAC 5/B80/18 - C I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwicke v Elizabeth Costen
  • STAC 5/B57/30 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwicke v Robert Costen
  • STAC 5/C51/10 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - William Barwicke v Philip Lovell

Baxter v Egmere

  • STAC 5/B35/40 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v John Egmere alias Poley
  • STAC 5/B18/19 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v John Eggmor alias Pollye
  • STAC 5/B3/5 - B A Rn - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v Thomas Elgood, John Poller alias Egmere et al
  • STAC 5/B37/7 - C I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v Thomas Ellgood, John Egmer alias Poley
  • STAC 5/B82/3 - I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v John Buckenham, Thomas Elgood
  • STAC 5/B26/26 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v Thomas Elgood
    • official malfeasance (of a bailiff of Earsham, charged with having coutnerfeited Edward Coke's seal) (cm)
  • STAC 5/B35/11 - A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Stephen Baxter v Thomas Elgood, John Buckenham
    • see STAC co Norfolk

Becker v Neave

  • STAC 5/B7/12 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Rose Becker v William Neve, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Becker et al
  • STAC 5/B67/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Roose Becker v Thomas Neave, William Neave, Thomas Bretton
    • Norfolk. Interrogatories to be administered on behalf of Roose Becker complt against Wyllm Neale . . . Thomas Bretton, Thomas Neale, Thomas Becker & Elinor his wife, Thomas Wyth.., John Alyson, Rauffe Symes & Edmund Crell.. defts. Complt is widow of Wyllm Becker of ?Suttyngton?, Norfolk. STAC 5/B67/18
    • see also STAC Becker

Beckham v Halman and Crane

  • STAC 5/B68/2 - B A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v [blank] Halman, Elizabeth Paynter et al
    • Bill of Richard Beckham of Little Frannsham, Norfolk. Defts Edmund Halman, Thomas Halman, John Halman, Robert Crane, Elizabeth Paynter.
    • Answers of Isabell (otherwise Elizabeth) Paynter widow to the bill of complaint of Richard Beckham.
    • Answers of Robarte Crane, Edmunde Halman, John Halman & Thomas Halman
    • Fronsham, Norfolk. Refers to writ of ravishment of ward from High Court of Chancery directed to the Shreve of Norfolk against the brothers Richard & Henrye Beckham, and a suit tried at Norwich Assizes by Robert Crane against Richard & Henrye Beckham concerning the wardship of Sara Futter, only daughter & heir of Rycharde Futter. Mention also of the death of Alice Futter, mother of Sara Futter.
  • STAC 5/B99/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v John Halman, Thomas Halrnan
  • STAC 5/B16/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
  • STAC 5/B103/9 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane, Edmund Halman et al
  • STAC 7/18/23 - - - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane

Bexwell v Gurney

  • STAC 5/B26/24 - B A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Rose Bexwell v George Gurney, William Isbells
    • forged deed (cm)
  • STAC 5/B13/4 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Rose Bexwell v William Isbells
  • STAC 5/B14/17 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Rose Bexwell v George Gurney

Bigott v Gaudy

  • STAC 5/B4/1 - B A - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Wiliiam Bigott v Thomas Gaudy, John Bachecrost, John Coppyng Jr, Stephen Gorney, Henry Estarve et al
    • William Bigott of Sterston, Norfolk. Manor of Beckhall in Sterston.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B79/24 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - William Bygott v Thomas Gawdy
  • STAC 5/B24/13 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - William Biggott v John Coppinge
  • STAC 5/B75/16 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - William Bygot v Stephen Burney, Henry Carter

Blenerhasset v Manser

  • STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
    • Norfolk. Estate of Thomas Pepis/Pepes.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
  • STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
  • STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
  • STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
    • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 13v. Examinations to impertinent interrogatories not to be given in evidence nor to be of force. William Blenhasset, armiger, plaintiff; Richard Munster, defendant: the court ordered that the defendant’s examinations to impertinent interrogatories not to be given in evidence at any trial or to be of force.Hillary 26 Elizabeth (kk)
    • see also STAC Blenerhasset

Blowfield v Gryme

  • STAC 5/B7/17 - B Dr - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - John Blowfield v William Gryme, John Ransome, Philip Bocking, Clement Herward, John Matchet et al
  • STAC 5/B2/1 - B A Dr Rn Rr - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - John Bloufyld v Thomas Gryme, Thomas Greene, Nicholas Hymore
  • STAC 5/B28/16 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - John Blowfield v Robert Younger, Thomas Grene
  • STAC 5/B94/30 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - John Blofyld v Thomas Gryme, Richard Gryme, Thomas Crew et al
  • STAC 5/B86/16 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - John Blowfield v Thomas Gryme, Richard Gryme, Nicholas Heames
  • STAC 5/B53/20 - B - - Norfolk - [blank] Bloufield v William Gryme, Thomas Green
  • STAC 5/B33/1 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Blowfyld v Thomas Gryme, Thomas Green, Richard Green et al
  • STAC 5/B63/36 - C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Peter Blofelde v Thomas Gryeme, Richard Gryeme, Nickelas Hayward
    • Interrs refer to the assizes at Thetford & Norwich. Deponent from Norfolk.(dk)
    • see also STAC Blowfield

Body v Snell

  • STAC 5/B31/8 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Body v Charles Snell, James Hargrave
    • Edward Body Citizen & Clothworker of London v Charles Snell & James Hargrave. Perjury. Trial of Edward Body v Peter Cartwright late mayor of Line. Deponents are of Lyn Regis, Norfolk.(dk)
    • see also STAC Body

Bolton v Alpe

  • STAC 5/B26/30 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Boulton v Edward Alpe, William Fiske et al
    • forged deeds (cm)
  • STAC 5/B29/5 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Boulton v John Appe
  • STAC 5/B30/39 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Boulton v William Alpe, William Fiske et al
  • STAC 5/B49/23 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Bolton v Edward Alpe et al
  • STAC 5/B34/40 - A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Bolton v John Fyske et al
  • STAC 5/B31/39 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Boulton v John Fyske et al
  • STAC 5/B64/7 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Bowles v Edward Alpe

Breadstreet v Tendall •STAC 7/1/33 - B A I D Rn - Mich 25/26 Eliz - Norfolk - Humphrey Brastret v John Tendall alias Kendall

    • TNA Note: Norwich: Procuring false testimony in a lawsuit for copyhold in the manors of Hockhams and Banham
    • Humphrey Brastret of Gislington co Norfolk yeoman. Repilcation dated Mich 25/26
    • see also STAC Breadstreet

Butler v Leverton

  • STAC 5/B1/31 - B A - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - John Butler v Cuthbert Leverton
    • John Butler of Catton co Norfolk yeoman. Cuthbert Leverton of Worsted [Worstead] co Norfolk gentleman owed Butler 200 marks to be paid in instalments at the south porch of Catton church
  • STAC 5/B14/5 - I D - 16 Eliz - Norfolk - John Butler v Cuthbert Leverton

Byles v Google

  • STAC 5/B26/18 - B A - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Biles v Robert Google, William Lindsey et al
    • forceable entry; assault (cm)
  • STAC 5/B88/18 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Byles v Robert Google, William Lynsey

C

Chabenor v Canon

  • STAC 5/C71/32 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Chabenor v Robert Cannon
  • STAC 7/2/8 - - - Norfolk - Robert Chabener v Robert Canon, Avery Canon
    • TNA Note: Perjury in a suit for right of way at Swaffham Market
    • see also STAC Chabenor

Clarke v Hope

  • STAC 5/C20/21 - B A - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Mathew Clarke v Francis Hopes, John Robinson
  • STAC 5/C24/38 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Mathew Clerke v Francis Hope, John Robinson

Cobbe v Hunt

  • STAC 5/C20/37 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobbe v Edmund Grownde et uxor, John Hunt et uxor et al
  • STAC 5/C14/12 - B A Rn - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobbe v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor et al
    • In re land in Wolverton Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/C7/37 - I Dn - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobb v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor, John Souckton et uxor, Christopher Goodman et al

Cobbe v Radcliffe

  • STAC 5/C46/8 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe, Gyles Skeete et al
  • STAC 5/C58/23 - I - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Giles Skyle et al
  • STAC 10/2/7 - I - - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe
    • Wolverton, Norfolk. Elizabeth Cobbe, widow. Trespass and destruction of property. Interrogatories administered on behalf of the plaintiff.
    • see also STAC Cobbe

Cockett v Shouldham

  • STAC 5/C22/9 - B A R - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - Anthony Cockett v William Shouldham, Thomas Shouldham, Hugh Powel et al
  • STAC 5/C39/6 - I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - Anthony Cockett v Thomas Sholdom, William Sholdom, Thomas Curtis et al
    • Manor of Marham & Shouldham, Norfolk. Resistance to the execution of a writ from Common Pleas against William Shouldham.(dk)
    • see also STAC Cockett

Cole v Whiting

  • STAC 5/C6/16 - B A C Rn - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - John Coles v [blank] Pyke, Thomas Whytinge, Richard Porter, William Hurman et al
    • Park called Kennyngale Old Parke in Kennyngale, Shelfhanger, Brysingham, Winfarthing & Forfeld, all Norfolk. Hunting deer with dogs & assault on keepers.(dk)
  • STAC 5/C19/35 - B A - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - John Coles v Thomas Whytinge, William Harman et al
  • STAC 5/C53/37 - I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - John Coles v Thomas Whytinge, Richard Porter et al

Collyson v Drake

  • STAC 5/C61/15 - B - 6 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Collyson v Francis Drake

Cooke v Dodge

  • STAC 5/C80/32 - B - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cooke v John Dodge, Thomas Fenn
    • Willm Cooke brother & heir to Thomas Cooke late of Little Barningham, Norfolk decd v John Dodge, Thomas Fen, Anthony Potter, Raphe Dodge, Robt Lumner, Robt Rogers, James Gunton et al. Land & crops in Barningham.(dk)
    • see also STAC Cooke

Cooke v Jewell

  • STAC 5/C3/25 - B C A - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coke v Edmund Jewell et uxor, Thomas Jewell
    • William Coke of Walcoote [Walcott] in Norfolk yeoman, two and a half acres of land in Estruston [East Ruston] Norfolk.
    • see also STAC Cooke

Cooper v Goose

  • STAC 5/C3/12 - B A - Mich 44/45 Eliz - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose, George Goose
    • Isaac Cooper of Yarmouth in Norfolk merchant. Inheritance dispute.
  • STAC 5/C10/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - John Cowper v William Goose, George Goose
  • STAC 10/2/4 - Rn - - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose and George Goose

Coppin v Palmer

  • STAC 5/C2/6 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Felthrop, Robert Barker, Robert Gooche, Thomas Grimsbye et al
    • William Coppinge of Beddingham in Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/C64/16 - A Rn C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppin v Robert Palmer, William Jackson, Robert Barker et al
  • STAC 5/C29/38 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge et al v Robert Palmer, John Cunger, Thomas Grimsbye et al
  • STAC 5/C71/12 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Nelthorpe et al

Cornwallis v Gesh and Pinner

  • STAC 5/C1/24 - B A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleys v Simon Gesh, John Pinner, John Smith, William Browett
    • Charles Cornwaleys of Carowe in the County of the City of Norwich esquire. In re the manor of Kilverston in Norfolk.
  • STAC 7/11/11 - - - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleis v Simon Gest, John Pynner
    • TNA Note: Kilverston: Forcible dispute as to cutting furze, etc.
    • see also STAC Cornwallis

Cromwell v Tavernor

  • STAC 5/C17/9 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Crumwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
  • STAC 5/C73/17 - I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Camwell [Cromwell] v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C35/9 - B A R Rr - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v James Taverner, William Batche
  • STAC 5/C30/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor
  • STAC 5/C58/5 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C78/14 - I - - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C73/3 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C45/36 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Crumwell v James Taverner et al
  • STAC 5/C32/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v John Browne
  • STAC 5/C38/21 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor, John Browne

Cromwell v Steward

  • STAC 5/C42/9 - B A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v Thomas Steward, John Taverner et al
  • STAC 5/C53/16 - I D - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v Thomas Steward
  • STAC 5/C74/14 - I D - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v Roger Townshend

Crosse v Futter

  • STAC 5/C78/13 - D - 1 Eliz - Norfolk - [blank] Crosse v [blank] Futter et al
    • Depositions of Nicholas ?Parker? and others. Messuage in Bryssingham, Norfolk.(dk)
    • see also STAC Cross

Crowe v Hutchinson

  • STAC 5/C69/12 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Crowe v Miles Warde, Ann Hutchinson
  • STAC 5/C64/3 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Crowe v Ann Hutchinson, Miles Word
    • Interrs refer to assizes held at Thetford, Norfolk.(dk)
    • see also STAC Crowe

Cubitt v Kempe

  • STAC/C64/9 - B - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Cubitt v John Kempe, James Smyth et al
    • Thomas Cubitt of Groningham, Norfolk. Lease of messuage etc in Alborough & Thurgarton, Norfolk for life of complts wife Margaret.(dk)
    • see also STAC Cubbitt

Curdey v Skeet

  • STAC 5/C1/37 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdy v John Skeete Sr, John Skette Jr, John Orrys, Richard Smyth
    • William Curdy of Aldeburgh in Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/C48/21 - I - Norfolk - William Curdye v John Orrys, John Skete Sr, John Skete Jr
  • STAC 5/C19/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdys v Richard Smith

Curtis v Evance

  • STAC 5/C3/5 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Curteis v Edmond Evance, Thomas Burton.

D

Dalton, Thomas

  • STAC 7/2/14 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Dalton v John Howe, Robert Davy, John Egmer, William Deker et al
  • STAC 7/2/14 - TNA Notes: Norwolde (Northwold or Norwood?) Forcible ejection, assault, and procurement of illegal title to a messuage

Day v Cobbe

  • STAC 5/D34/30 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Cuthbert Dey v William Cobbe, John Butler, Thomas Back et al
    • Breaking terms of lease. (cm)
    • see also STAC Day

Daynes v Robinson

  • STAC 5/D2/28 - B - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - John Daynes v John Robinson
    • John Daynes of Buxton, Norfolk. Title to messuage etc in Hicklinge, Norfolk, formerly of Christopher Heath of Hicklinge.(dk)
    • see also STAC Deane

Denney v Gee and Butler

  • STAC 5/D37/32 - B A R - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - George Denney v William Gee, Thomas Osborne, John Butler et al
  • STAC 5/D41/12 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - George Dennye v John Butler et al
  • STAC 5/D26/36 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - George Dennye v John Butler, William Osborne
  • STAC 5/D33/15 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - George Denny v John Butler
  • STAC 5/D28/22 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - George Denny v William Gee
  • STAC 5/D16/22 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - George Dennye v John Butler
    • Claim that a will proved at the Consistory Court of Norwich had been fraudulently altered. Deponents from Lincoln's Inn, Middx & Kings Lynn, Norfolk.(dk)
  • STAC 5/D20/1 - B - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - George Dennise v William Gee

Denny v Robbins

  • STAC 5/D42/8 - B - - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Symon Robbins, Katherine Fitt et al
    • Edward Dennye of the City of Norwich, grocer. Breaking down walls of a chamber & kitchen & taking away complts goods, under cover of administring the estate of Richard Pitt late of the City of Norwich, who had been a tenant of the complt.(dk)
  • STAC 5/D41/14 - A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Denney v Symon Robins et al

Denny v Sergeant

  • STAC 5/D34/16 - B - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Thomas Sergeant, Edmund Smyth
    • Norwich, Dispute over a bond; Debt. (cm)
    • see also STAC Denny

Denney v Tyler

  • STAC 5/D33/35 - B A - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Johane Tyler et al
  • STAC 5/D5/6 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Johne Tyler et al
    • Interrogatories to be ministered to Johane Tyler one of the defts on behalf of Edward Dennye complt. What kinred or affinity is or was between you Johane Tyler and Simon Robbyns of Norwich, oatmeal maker & Richard Fitt late of Norwich, carrier. Did you meet with the said Edward Dennye in Norwich in the day wherein the said Richard Fitt was buried. (dk)
  • STAC 7/11/17 - - - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Joan Tyler
    • TNA Note: Perjury in the Court of Requests
  • STAC 5/D25/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Dennye v Johane Tyler widow

Denny v Whall

  • STAC 5/D29/38 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Denny v James Morrant, Thomas Whall
  • STAC 5/D37/8 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Dennys v James Morant
  • STAC 5/D14/34 - B Dr - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Denny v Augustine Whall, Thomas Whall et al
    • Edward Dennie of the City of Norwich. False accusations and slander in response to case at Norwich Sessions & also previous case of libel brought by this complt to this court.(dk)
    • see also STAC Denny

Dereham v Barton

  • STAC 5/D21/8 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, Robert Edge, John Atkins
  • STAC 5/D36/17 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, John Atkins
  • STAC 5/D34/26 - C I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dearham v Peter Barton
  • STAC 7/11/27 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Deareham v Peter Barton, John Atkyns
    • TNA Note: West Dereham: Affray.
  • STAC 7/20/25 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Derham v Peter Barton et al

Dewing v Dynne

  • STAC 5/D41/27 - Dr - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Dewinge v Thomas Dynne
  • STAC 5/D1/10 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Dewing v Robert Haude
    • Deponents: Robert Haude, of ?Hackford?, Norfolk, tallow chandler, aged 45. (dk)
    • see also STAC Dewing

Doddington v Farmer

  • STAC 5/D3/31 - B - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Leonard Doddington v Thomas Farmer, Erasmus Dymye, Edward Growte, Robert Armstrong et al
    • Leonard Doddington of West Barsham Norfolk gent. Thomas Farmer of East Barsham esq
    • see also STAC Doddington

Doddington v Farmer

  • STAC 5/D3/2 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Leonard Doddington v Thomas Farmer, Geoffry Tuttle, George Sherwood, Robert Kesil et al
    • West Barsham, Norfolk
  • STAC 5/D39/25 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Leonard Doddington v John Deane Jr, Richard Mason, George Pinder
  • STAC 5/D25/5 - D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Leonard Doddington v

Dodge v Cooke

  • STAC 5/D3/4 - B A - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - John Dodge v Thomas Cooke, William Cooke, Robert Eldin, John Doe
  • STAC 5/D26/16 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - John Dodge v William Cooke, Robert Eldinge, John Dove
  • STAC 5/D10/30 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - John Dodge v Thomas Cooke, William Cooke, Robert Eldinge et al

E

Eastgate v Harrold

  • STAC 5/E6/31 - B A - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Estgate v Richard Barfoote, John Harrold et al
    • Henry Estgate of Shingham, Norfolk executor of his brother Wyllm Estgate late of Stanford, Norfolk v Rychard Barfoote (decd's nephew), John Harrold & Abraham Symonds. Breaking into chest a the decd at Stanford while he on his deathbed at Thetford, Norfolk & stealing bills, bonds, money plate etc.(dk)
  • STAC 5/E13/1 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Eastgate v John Harrold et al

Eden v Downing

  • STAC 5/E1/14 - B A Rn Rr - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden v William Downing, Edward Brown, Simon Sippens, Richard Thompson et al
  • STAC 5/E15/33 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden v William Downing Edward Browne et al
  • STAC 5/E13/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Edon v William Downinge, Edward Browne
    • Parsonage House in Martham, Norfolk. Deft William Downing is of Yarmouth, Norfolk.(dk)
    • see also STAC Eden

Eden v Downing

  • STAC 5/E11/38 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v William Doewning, Henry Wilcocks, Robert Hall et al
  • STAC 5/E14/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Henry Willcock, William Downing, Robert Layton
    • Thomas Edon of Martham co Norfolk yeoman. Whereas the Dean and Chapter of Norwich owned the rectory of Martham and the parsonage house. 21 year lease to complainant. Answer of William Downinge gent. Now so it is may it please your most excellent Majesty that Wm Downing gent, Edward Browne, Simonde Sippens, Richard Tompson, and Robert Buclingham and divers other persons to your said subject unknown, hot [having] the fear of god before their eis nor any dutiful regard to your Majesties good and godlie laws upon the 9th day of may now last passed did in warlike disorderlie and unlawfull manner assemble and bande themsellves together at Martham. And upon the said day with force and arms that is to say with swords halberts morris pykes piked staves and divers other weapons as well invasive as defensive into the said messuage called the parsonage house forcible riotously and unlawfully did break and enter. And one Anthony Edon and one Richarde Wattes then [being in] the said messuage by the appointment and commandment of your said subject did beat wound and evell intreat.
  • STAC 5/E2/5 - A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Robert Burlingham

Evans v Newbie

  • STAC 5/E1/12 - B - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Evans v Edmund Newbie, Robert Usher, Nicholas Kent, Robert Blenkinsop alias Sextus, John Mower, Clement Warnes, William Tompson [ ] Davison
    • Thomas Evans of the parish of Saxtropte [Saxthorpe?] co Norfolk. Two water mills for the grinding of Corn and one other mill for fullinge of Clothe scituate and being within the parish of Horsteed [Horstead] co Norfolk. Forcible entry and ejection.
  • STAC 5/E9/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Evans v Edmond Newby et al

Exham v Cubitt

  • STAC 5/E4/7 - B A C I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Exham v Edward Cubytt, Thomas Greene et al
    • Deponents: William Cubytte, Thomas Grene, William Goodwyne, Edward Palmer gent, John Marker yeoman, Robert Aldrich yeoman, James Meeke, William Deynes. A questionable deed of feoffment, Acle Norfolk
    • see also STAC Exham for other possible references

F

Farmor v Haydon

  • STAC 5/F30/39 - B - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermer v Sir William Heydon
  • STAC 5/F3/27 - B A C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Farmor v Sir William Haydon.
    • Thomas Farmor of East Bashnn’in co Norfolk esquire.
    • see also STAC Farmer

Farmor v Grimston

  • STAC 5/F3/19 - B A - Hli 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grympston.
  • STAC 5/F21/22 - B - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Farmer v Christopher Grimeston
  • STAC 5/F20/28 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grimston
  • STAC 5/F17/22 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grynston

Fawcett v Woolman, Boston and Sharpe

  • STAC 5/F22/14 - B A Rn C - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcett v William Wolman, John Sharpe et al.
    • James Fawcett of Kings Lynne in the co of Norfolk whereas Robert Page and Elizabeth his wife executrix of Wm Judye deceased . . was possessed of one cupboard and divers other goods . . Perjury & false declaration in the Court of Kings Lynne.(dk)
  • STAC 5/F4/2 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcet v William Wolman, John Sharp, Thomas Boston, Thomas Miller et al
  • STAC 5/F31/28 - Rr - - Norfolk - James Fawcet v Thomas Boston, William Woolman et al

Fenn v Flowerdew

  • STAC 5/F26/21 - B - - Norfolk - William Fenn v Thomas Allenn, Stephen Flowerdue et al
  • STAC 5/F8/12 - Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdine et uxor, John Vinyor Sr et al
  • STAC 5/F6/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenn v Stephen Flowerden et uxor, Thomas Allen et al
  • STAC 5/F13/17 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdew et al
    • Interrs refer to lands in Burston & Thurnynge. Depositions taken at Aylsham. Deponent from Norfolk.(dk)
  • STAC 7/12/7 - - - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdewe, et Agnes uxor, John Vinyour et al
    • TNA Note: Burston and Thirning: Estate of Thomas Appleton.
    • see also STAC Fenn

Fenton v Wright

  • STAC 5/F10/23 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, William Edes et al
  • STAC 5/F2/5 - B A C - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, Henry Huntson, William Brown, William Eades et al.
    • That whereas one Robert Clarke of Walpole in the co of Norfolk deceased . . .
  • STAC 5/F16/15 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright, William Welbie et al

Fisher v Grey

  • STAC 5/F13/6 - B A C I D - 4 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Fisher v David Grey
    • Whereas one Davyd Maydowye als David Graye of Upwell, Norfolk, a Scott and no denizen is and of long time hath been a common disturber of all your quiet & well disposed subjects. Bribery of poor people under threat of taking them to court at Westminster under accusations of regrating and forestalling or unlawfully trying to sell corn. Example of Norfolk spelt as Northfolke.(dk)
    • see also STAC Fisher

Fiske v Goldsmith and Gaunt

  • STAC 5/F22/19 - B A - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fiske v Henry Goldsmith, Christopher Gaunte et al
    • Ambrose Fyske of Welles in co Norfolk, merchaunte was impleaded by one Edwarde Waytes before the Mayor and recorder of Lynne in the town court there . . . an action upon the case . . Waytes and John Chartres of Lynne merchaunt bought of Fyske one ship called the George for 240li.)
  • STAC 5/F12/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Christopher Grante, Nicholas Derbye et al
  • STAC 7/2/29 - - - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Edward Waytes, Christopher Gaunt
    • TNA Notes: Lynn: Perjury in a suit concerning a ship.
    • see also STAC Fiske

Flatman v Ward and Pigeon

  • STAC 5/F19/4 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v William Ward, John Pigeon, Robert Prentice
  • STAC 5/F25/23 - B A C - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Flattman v William Ward, Robert Prentice et al
  • STAC 5/F24/7 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Bigeon, Robert Tyte
  • STAC 7/12/9 - - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Pigeon, John Tyte et al
    • TNA Note: Norwich: Verdict of deft's, as a jury.
    • see also STAC Flatman

Flatman v Carter

  • STAC 5/F2/20 - B - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Carter, John Rose, Richard Shreve, Henry Horne

Flatman v Flatman

  • STAC 5/F2/1 - B Dr - Trin 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Flatman, Robert Prince, Richard Flatman, et al

Flint v Jenippe

  • STAC 5/F12/17 - B A Rn Rr - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Flynt v Robert Jenyppe, William Etheridge et al
  • STAC 5/F9/36 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Flyatt v Robert Jemppe, William Etheridge et al
    • Interrogatories to be ministered to Robt Jemppe, William Etheridge, James Beales, Leonard Hodges & Harry James defts at the suit of Robt Flyutt/Flyatt gent, include: Do you know the piece of ground mentioned in the bill, lately inclosed by Robt Flyutt. Do you know of any inclosure made about the said parcel of ground in the time of John Chamberlaine late Lord of the manor of Little Elingham and what person(s) attempted to pull down the rails. Did the parson of your town either in the pulpit or otherwise, preach or speak against the same inclosure. Depositions, 26 Jun Anno 24 Eliz: Robert Jempye of Ellingham Norfolk husbandman, William Etheridge of Ellingham Norfolk carpenter, James Beales of Ellingham Norfolk husbandman, Leonard Hogges of Ellingham Norfolk cooper, Henry James of Ellingham Norfolk husbandman (dk)
  • STAC 5/F15/40 - B A - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Flynt v Robert Jennepy
  • STAC 5/F31/10 - Rn - - Norfolk - Robert Flynt v Robert Jenype
  • STAC 5/F27/2 - I D - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Flynt v Thomas Diamond, John Dyver et al
  • STAC 5/F18/30 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Flynte v Robert Jenippe

Forest v Lacy and Booth

  • STAC 5/F3/14 - B A - Trin 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest et uxor v John Lacey, William Booeth, George Booeth et uxor, John Burbitch et al.
    • John Forrest gent. of Holkham Norfolk and Alice his wife, late the widow and administratrix of Edmund Windham esquire.
  • STAC 5/F19/19 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest v George Boothe, John Burbyche, Henry Call

Fowler v Wright

  • STAC 5/F12/12 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - George Fowler v Thomas Wright, William Mater et al
    • George Fowler of Bromehill, Norfolk. Perjury. Customs of the manor. Refers to Chancery bill of Thomas Wright & John Fysher of Wetinge, Norfolk v George Fowler.(dk)
    • see also STAC Fowler

Fulhurste v Vowell

  • STAC 5/F3/30 - B - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - George Fulshurste v Thomas Vowell, Robert Vowell, Richard Fiejohn alias Feejohn, Robert Franklin et al
    • George Fulhurste of London gent. Thomas Vowell in [blank] co Norfolk.
    • see also STAC Fullhurst

Fuller v Blowfield

  • STAC 5/F2/8 - B - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blonfield
    • See the Case inter Fuller et Blofeild where the procurer of a perjurie was Convicted & the perjurie never dealt with or prosecuted. BL Harley 2143 f.11v - P 16 Eliz
  • STAC 5/F10/8 - A - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blowfeld
  • STAC 5/F1/2 - I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blofeld
    • Interrogatories to be ministered on behalf of John Fuller complt against John ?Blouffeld deft, include: Were you bound 3 April 11 Eliz to the complt in £110. Did you retain Mr Cobbe, clerk of assise at Thetforde assise [Norfolk]. Did you know George Galtye, William Taylour, John Bright & William Harmer, and what money or rewards did you give them before the said assise at Thetford last past. Deposition 19 May Anno 14 Eliz: John Blofelde of Cromer Norfolk gentleman
  • STAC 5/F31/1 - C I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blowfeld
  • STAC 5/F23/29 - Rn - - Norfolk - John Fullar v John Blowfeild
  • STAC 5/F5/7 - I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blonfild
  • STAC 7/21/30 - - - Norfolk - John Fuller v John Blowfyld

Fuller v Dalton and Elmer

  • STAC 5/F7/33 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Richard Elemour, Thomas Neale et al
  • STAC 5/F1/11 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller, Henry Sparrow, Robert Dalton v Richard Elmor, Thomas Neale, Robert Sparrow, Robert Raymond Sr, Robert Raymond Jr
  • STAC 5/F3/5 - B Dr - Hil 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Dalton, Richard Elmer
    • Thomas Fuller of Norhold in co Norfolk. Henry Sparrowe and Robart Dalton of the said town yeomen.
  • STAC 5/F7/14 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Rayner Sr et al

Fuller v Stone

  • STAC 5/F13/24 - B A - - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Thomas Stone, Richard Raven, William Pytte et al
    • Thomas Fuller of Morley, Norfolk. Customs of commoning at Morley, Norfolk.(dk)
  • STAC 5/F21/23 - I D - 9 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v William Pyttes, Stephen Chytterlyn et al

G

Gurboldsham v Muskett

  • STAC 5/G14/1 - B - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - The Parishioners of Gurboldsham all Saints, v William Muskett, Simon Muskett.

Gurdon v Peirson

  • STAC 5/G8/39 - B A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Gyrdon v Thomas Peirson
    • John Gyrden of Walpole, Norfolk. Fraudulent insertion into the will of Robert Gyrden after his death, bill recites will. Messuage in Walpole.(dk)
    • see also STAC Gurdon

H

Harvey v Chardelowe

  • STAC 5/H35/19 - B - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Harvie v John Chardelowe, John Howard, Thomas Wales et al
    • Thomas Harvie, citizen & grocer of London & Edmond Clarke of Brissingham, Norfolk. Fraud. Norfolk.(dk)
    • see also STAC Harvey

Hilton v Boulton

  • STAC 5/H20/28 - B A Rn Rr - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Matthew Hilton v Francis Boulton, John Shurlowe et al
  • STAC 5/H32/8 - I D - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Matthew Hilton v Francis Boulton et al
  • STAC 5/H53/25 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Matthew Hilton v Francis Bolton, et al
    • Interrogatories to be ministered to witnesses on behalf of Mathewe Hilton gent complt against Francis Bowlton gent & others defts, include: Did you know John Hiltonn, clerk, late parson of Burston, Norfolk decd. Do you know how much ready money, gold, plate or jewels the said John Hilton had at his death. Deponent, 24 Apr Anno 33 Eliz,Thernbyn Brook of Waynefild Suffolk yeoman aged 26. Deponent, 27 Apr Anno 33 Eliz, Anthony Shardilowe of Mettfield Suffolk gentleman aged 37
    • see also STAC Hilton

Hobart v Hobart

  • STAC 5/H35/17 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Hobart v Thomas Hobart, John Brend
    • Henry Hobarte of Intwoode, Norfolk. Wardship of Thomas Hobarte son & heir of Miles Hobarte late of Little Plumsted, Norfolk.(dk)
    • see also STAC Hobart

Howard v Mulley

  • STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon
    • TNA Notes: Kenninghall: Resistance to a distress.
    • see also STAC Howard

Hunt v Whiting

  • STAC 5/H60/31 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting, John Browne et al
  • STAC 5/H18/23 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting
  • STAC 5/H28/13 - I D - 10 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Wytty et al
  • STAC 7/12/37 - - - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Windam, Thomas Wyttye, Walter Whiting, Robert Howse et al
    • TNA Note: Gimingham: Forcible entry on lands held of the manor.
    • see also STAC Hunt

I J

Ireland v Wright and Bright

  • STAC 5/J7/28 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
  • STAC 5/J3/20 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
    • The Complainant was in the Fleet prison at the suit of Thomas Tooley on a forged bond. Deposition of Thomas Bleverhassell of the City of Norwich.
  • STAC 5/J15/39 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, Thomas Wright, Thomas Buxley
  • STAC 5/J20/32 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Thomas Wright, Peter Bright et al
  • STAC 5/J22/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v John Puxley, Thomas Wright et al

Jennor v Fairfax

  • STAC 5/J7/30 - B A Rn - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v Thomas Jennor, John Jennor, William Fayrefax
  • STAC 5/J4/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v William Fairfax et al
    • Francis Jennor is an infant. Margaret Jennor his mother acts for him.
    • see also STAC Jenner

Jervis v Tubbard

  • STAC 5/J3/16 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervys, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henbury
    • Messuage in Felbrigge Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/J7/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervis, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henburye
  • STAC 5/J13/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jearvens v Christopher Henbery, Edward Tubberd

Johnson v Smyth

  • STAC 5/J3/28 - B - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Johnson v Thomas Smyth, Jacob Preston et Mary uxor, Robert Jolly, Thomas Haplye, John Pryor, Henry Bacon, William Preston, Thomas Mendham, Abraham Preston, Isaac Preston, Richard Lytleproude, Adam Page.
    • Thomas Johnson of Old Buckenham and Dorothie his wife.
    • see also STAC Johnson

Jubye v Youngman

  • STAC 5/J1/3 - B A - Mich 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jubye v Thomas Youngeman, William Jubye, John Sherwyn, William Yongeman
  • STAC 5/J4/5 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jewbye v William Yongeman, William Jewbye
    • Deposition of Thomas Youngman of Carleton Norfolk and others.
  • STAC 5/J15/33 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jewbie v Thomas Youngman, William Youngman, William Jewbie

K

Killingtree v Pell

  • STAC 5/K1/3 - B A Rn - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Killingtree, Robert Jervis, John Grigby, George Baker, Francis Shaxton, Thomas Overend v John Pell, Geofery Pell, Valentine Pell, Thomas Blesbie, Henry Violet, William Woolman, Richard Walters, Thomas Maye, Christopher Fisher, Robert Hulliard, Thomas Fowell, Thomas Haughton
    • Wm Killingtree mayor of your highness town of Kings Lynne in the county of Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/K8/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - The Mayor of Kings Lynn v John Pell Jeffrey Pell, Christopher Fisher et al

Knyvett v Dixon

  • STAC 5/K8/32 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
  • STAC 5/K5/30 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knivett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
  • STAC 5/K4/34 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Richard Ringwood, Ralph Dixon et al

Knyvett v Booty

  • STAC 5/K1/36 - B A Rn Rr C I D - Mich 32/33 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knivett v John Gallard, John Bootie, Stephen Whitting et al
  • STAC 5/K3/5 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v Thomas Burgess, John Burgess et al
  • STAC 5/K6/34 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knevett v John Booties Sr, William Ryder

Knyvett v Booty

  • STAC 5/K2/8 - B A I D - Easter 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knivett v John Botye, John Burge Jr, William Rider, Robert Keene, George Browne
    • Sir Thomas Knivett of Asshwelthorpe Hall Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/K7/12 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burghe, William Rider et al
  • STAC 5/K14/32 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burgess, William Ryder et al

L

Leake v Emerson

  • STAC 5/L18/6 - B A I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Leake v John Emerson, Thomas Claxton et al
    • Wm Leake of Hardingham, Norfolk. Lease of a messuage called Hewks in Swithins Street, Hardingham.(dk)
    • see also STAC Leake for another possible reference

M

Marsham v Brampton

  • STAC 5/M13/13 - B A - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - The inhabitants of the town of Marsham v James Brampton, William Gedney et al

N

Nynge v Paston

  • STAC 5/N5/25 - B - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Nynge v Sir William Paston et al
  • STAC 5/N13/5 - A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Nynge v Sir William Paston
  • STAC 5/N4/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Nides v Sir William Paston, Godfrey Pendleton et al
  • STAC 5/N6/28 - C I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Ninge v Sir William Paston, Godfrey Pendleton et al
    • Interrs refer to riot & attack on parish church & parsonage of Knapton (no county). Deponents from Knapton, Paston, Stokesby & Cromer [Norfolk].(dk)
  • STAC 5/N15/40 - Rn Rr - - Norfolk - Edward Nynge v Godfrye Pendleton, Lawrence Bond et al
  • STAC 5/N3/32 - A Rn - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Edward Nynge v Giles Skeete, Thomas Woodrowe et al

O

Oldman v Paston

  • STAC 5/O7/21 - B A Rn - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - John Oldman v Sir William Paston, Thomas Jermy, Robert Cooper et al
    • John Oldman of the City of Norwich, fisherman. Rights to fish from the 3 rivers leading to Yarmouth & especially for eels & elvets. Outlines the jurisdictions of the various owners of fishing on the 3 rivers.(dk)
  • STAC 5/O8/11 - B A C - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - John Oldman v Sir William Paston, Robert Cooper et al
  • STAC 5/O8/23 - I D - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - John Oldman v John Punnett, William Lovelytch et al.
  • STAC 5/O5/23 - I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - John Oldman v Sir William Paston et al.

P

Parfrey v Stokes

  • STAC 5/P46/39 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes et al
  • STAC 5/P53/17 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes
  • STAC 5/P13/26 - B A - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfraye v Thomas Stokes et al
  • STAC 5/P37/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes, Christopher Stokes
  • STAC 7/14/18 - - - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes et al

Peter v Fisher

  • STAC 5/P4/6 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 32 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v James Fisher, Thomas Carter, Francis Holle
  • STAC 5/P17/8 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v James Fisher, Thomas Carter
  • STAC 5/P38/39 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v Francis Holle et al
  • STAC 5/P8/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v Thomas Carter, James Fisher, Francis Holle
    • Deponents: George Weber aged 23, George Bowgen gent aged 68, Richard Tolye aged 44, Christian Smith aged 22, Johan the wife of Edward Wyer aged 40 all of Norwich Norfolk.
  • STAC 5/P39/32 - I - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v Thomas Carter, James Fysher
  • STAC 5/P40/27 - I D - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - William Peter v Thomas Clarke

Q

R

Ragland v Yelverton

  • STAC 5/R43/2 - B - - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton, Thomas Gybbon et al
    • Bill of Sir Thomas Ragland of Wallington co Norfolk. Dame Anne his wife deceased was sometime wife of Christopher Conysby Esquire deceased.

Ragland owed Wallingford Hall for 16 years since his wife’s death and before that in her right. He was away on business in Glamorgan. William Yelvirston Esq of Rowgham [Rougham] co Norfolk, Thomas Gybbon esq of Lynne co Norfolk, Edward Waters gent of Lynne co Norfolk, Edmond Waters of Lynne co Norfolk, Thomas Might of Flycham [Flitcham] Norfolk Henry Valenger of Lynne gents and John Dalderby of Rowgham yeoman. 20 armed persons.

  • STAC 5/R32/24 - B A Rn Rr - 6 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton, Edward Waters et al
  • STAC 5/R41/27 - I D - 7 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton et al

Ramsay v Fawcett

  • STAC 5/R1/27 - B - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsay v William Faucet
    • John Ramsey of the City of Norwich merchant.
  • STAC 5/R4/7 - A Rn Rr - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsay v William Fawcett
  • STAC 5/R5/20 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsey v William Fawcett

Reade v Adamson

  • STAC 5/R28/21 - B A Rn - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - William Read, William Bowton v John Adamson, Robert Olyver
    • Depositions of John Adamson clerk vicar of Gooderstone co Norfolk and Robert Oliver of Hilb. . . co Norfolk, shepherd. In re a debt due to be paid at the parsonage in Gooderstone.
  • STAC 5/R43/14 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - William Rede, William Bowton v John Adamson, Robert Oliver (includes STAC 5/B14/3)

Reade v Green and Britton

  • STAC 5/R35/17 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Humfry Britton
  • STAC 7/5/4 - - - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Thomas Grene, Humphrey Bretten
    • TNA Note: Forgery of a writ removing a suit to Westminster from the manorial court of Gimingham.
    • see also STAC Read

Rigdon v Constable

  • STAC 5/R1/32 - B - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - William Rigdon, Dame Eleonor Buck v Robert Constable, William Taylor et al
    • Bill of Wm Rigdon esq and Dame Ellinor Buck his wife, late wife of Sir John Buck knight deceased. Exhibited her bill in Star Chamber by the name of Lady Eleanor Buck widow. Deceit in the purchase of wool.
    • see also STAC Rigdon

Rosse v Shinkwin

  • STAC 5/R30/6 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmond Shinkvyne
  • STAC 5/R18/13 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkwyne
  • STAC 5/R9/24 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkquyne
  • STAC 5/R24/15 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Ross v Edmund Shinquin
  • STAC 5/R1/21 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinckwin
    • Interrogatories by Rosse to Shinckwyn. Depositions of Firnun Shinkwyn of Etedeareham, Norfolk, husbandman. In re land at Waton Co. Norfolk. John Neave of Graies Inn house and grounds in Weston, Norfolk Thomas Green of the parish of St Buttalls within the liberties of Smithfield saylemaker. Nicholas Hellwys of Weston, Norfolk. John Jackson of the parish of St Buttolls without Allgate, London. John Croke servant to Thomas Wood of the parish of St Buttalls without Allgate Scrivener.
    • see also STAC Rosse

Russe v Franklin

  • STAC 5/R40/7 - B A Rn C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Russe v Robert Franklin
  • STAC 5/R43/10 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Russe v Robert Francklin
    • Interrogatories on behalf of Thomas Russe. Deposition of Robert Frankling of the city of Norwich draper. Interrogatories on behalf of Robert Frankling deft. Deposition of Philip Chapman of London gent, Attorney of Common Pleas. Interrogatories to be put to the Bishop of the Isle of Man. Depostiion of the Bishop of the Isle of Man.
    • see also STAC Russe

S

Smith v Woodhouse

  • STAC 5/S43/20 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/S30/7 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/S37/21 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smythe v Sir Henry Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/S57/22 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse
  • STAC 5/S14/3 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/S1/15 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smyth v Sir Henry Woodhouse
    • Int (only a scrap): Whether in or about the 17 day of the moneth of Februarie in the 38 yeare of her majesties said raigne were you made acquainted or did you know that the pl was then to purchase of Sir Henrie and Sir William Woodhouse knights the late dissolved monastery of Bromholme . . . (Bromholm Priory). Dep: primus die decembr Anno 42 Eliz. Thomas Woodehowse of Ellingham co Norfolk gent aged 34 years.
  • STAC 5/S54/21 - I D - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse

Snell v Body

  • STAC 5/S37/28 - B A Dr I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Snell, James Hargrave v Edward Body, John Smith et al
  • STAC 5/S17/28 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Snell, James Hargrave v Edward Bedell et al
    • Interrs refer to Edward Bodye of London, clothworker & common informer, and to a complaint to the Exchequer accusing the current complts (Snell & Hargrave) of engrossing corn & butter. Deponent from Norfolk.(dk)
  • STAC 5/S13/11 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Snell, James Hargrave v Edward Bodye et al
    • Interrs refer to demise of land at West Wretham, Norfolk, to cause brought at Exchequer by the information of Edward Bodie, and to whether Edward Bodie had ever procured money by making threatening speeches.(dk)
    • see also STAC Snell

Sporeley v Makender

  • STAC 5/W16/28 - I D - 1 Eliz - Lincolnshire, Norfolk - Inhabitants of Woolverton [?Wolfreton] v Inhabitants of Lynn
  • STAC 7/5/15 - - - Lincolnshire, Norfolk - Roger Sporeley, Alexander Tebye, John Geyges et al inhabitants of Wolverton v John Makender, Ralph Downes, Edward Andrye, Thomas Ladyman et al
    • TNA Note: Wolverton and Lynn: Forcible dispute as to gathering mussels, and false imprisonment.
    • see also STAC Wolverton and see also STAC Sporeley

Stutville v Chapman

  • STAC 5/S1/36 - B A - Hil 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Stutvile v Nicholas Chapman, Robert Sylvester, Robert Gowche
    • Great Melton, Norfolk. Lands of Robert Downes confiscated for recusancy.(dk)
  • STAC 5/S72/15 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Stuteville v Nicholas Chapman, Robert Silvester et al
  • STAC 5/S22/9 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Stuteville v Richard Chapman, Robert Silvester et al

T

Taverner v Crumwell

  • STAC 5/T11/3 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - James Taverner v Thomas Crumwell, Thomas Wigmore et al
  • STAC 5/T22/9 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - James Taverner v Thomas Crumwell et al
  • STAC 5/T25/8 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - James Taverner v Thomas Crumwell

Taverner v Thompson

  • STAC 5/T35/30 - B A - 16 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Thomas Lusher, Margaret Thompson et al
  • STAC 7/15/44 - - - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Margery Tompson et al
    • TNA Note: Perjury in the Exchequer on behalf of Lord Cromwell, in a suit for the manors of North Elmham and Beetley. Roger Taverner, deputy surveyor of the Queen's woods.
    • see also STAC Taverner

Thetford Corporation v Bassingwaite

  • STAC 5/T37/37 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Mayor and Burgesses of Thetford v John Bassingwayte, Antony Freere et al

Townsend v Worth

  • STAC 5/T3/11 - B A - Easter 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Dame Jane Townsend v Ambrose Worth et uxor, Robert Worth Sr, Robert Worth Jr, Thomas Whiskard et al 
  • STAC 5/T26/28 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Jane Townsend v Ambrose Worth, Robert Worth

Tymperley v Fowle

  • STAC 5/T22/19 - B A Rn - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Raffe Fowle, Launcelott Bell
  • STAC 5/T26/22 - I D - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Launcelot Bell, Ralph Fowle
  • STAC 5/T24/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Raffe Fowle
  • STAC 5/T15/38 - I D - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Ralph Fowle et al
  • STAC 5/T9/40 - I - - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Ralph Fowle et al
    • Interrs refer to assault, and to perjury at Norwich Assizes.(dk)
  • STAC 5/T39/7 - I - - Norfolk - Thomas Tymperley v Raffe Fowle, Martin Cobbes et al

Tymperley v Themilthorpe

  • STAC 5/T17/29 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Tympley v Thomas Thinilthorpe
  • STAC 7/7/30 - - - Norfolk - Henry Tymperley, v Thomas Themilthorpe, John Potter
    • TNA Note: Will of Bartram Themilthorpe of Worstead.
    • see also STAC Timperley

Trindle v Woodhouse

  • STAC 5/T34/31 - B - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Trundell, Thomas Trundell v Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
  • STAC 5/T26/5 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Tryndle, Thomas Tryndle v Sir Roger Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/T18/27 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Tryndell, Thomas Tryndell v Sir Roger Woodehouse, Henry Blake
  • STAC 5/T13/40 - I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tryndell et uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
  • STAC 7/15/50 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Trundell, et Agnes uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
    • TNA Note: Carlton etc: Tenancy in first deft's manor - STAC 7/15/50
    • see also STAC Trindle

UV

W

Whitney v Gest

  • STAC 5/W32/20 - B - - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v John Geste, William Tompson et al
  • STAC 5/W56/39 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v Lawrence Fytt, William Thompson
    • Thetford, Norfolk. Robert Whitney, Gent. Interrogatories of John Gest of Thetford, Norfolk and William Tompson of Thetford, shoemaker.
  • STAC 5/W29/1 - A Rn C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v William Thompson, Lawrence Fytt et al

Winchester College Oxford v Palmer

  • STAC 5/C64/14 - B A C - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Martin Culpepper, The Scholars of St Mary's College of WInchester in Oxford (New College) v Nicholas Palmer, Francis Peerson et al
    • Martyn Culpeper, warden of St Mary's College of Winchester in Oxford & the scholars of said college. Manors of Witchingham, Longvile & Weston Longvile, Norfolk. Stopping up of a cut used to drain flood water and to supply water to a mill.(dk)
  • STAC 5/W22/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Winchester College Oxford v Nicholas Palmer, John Palmer, Francis Peirson et al

Woodhouse v Bate

  • STAC 5/W74/38 - B - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Richard Batt
  • STAC 5/W21/8 - B A Rn C I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Richard Bate, Thomas Owtlawe
  • STAC 5/W6/4 - B A Rn Rr C - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Richard Bate
    • Roger Woodhouse of Kimberley Norfolk esquire v Richard Bate of Norwich Alderman. Connection with a case concerning Henry Knevett son of Sir Thomas Knevett and the court of wards and liveries
  • STAC 5/W78/5 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Owtelawe
  • STAC 5/W71/26 - A - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Outlawe

Woodhouse v Grant

  • STAC 5/W79/12 - B - - Norfolk - Henry Woodhouse v Cristopher Grant, Thomas Grave et al
  • STAC 5/W27/11 - A Rn I D - 18 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Woodhouse v Christopher Graunte, John Pell et
  • STAC 5/W13/17 - I D - 18 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Woodhouse v Christopher Grante
  • STAC 5/W56/14 - I D - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Woodhouse v John Pell, John Grave et al
  • STAC 5/W58/12 - C I D - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Woodehouse v Cristopher Graunte, John Pell et al
  • STAC 5/W61/16 - I D - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Woodehouse v Cristopher Traunt, Richard Whitworth et al

Woodhouse v Kett

  • STAC 5/W22/13 - B A - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhowse v Valentine Kett
  • STAC 7/16/22 - - - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Richard Kett, Hilary Baly et al
    • TNA Note: Mileham and Beeston: Maintenance of a drain and bridge on the manor, common of pasture.
  • STAC 5/W3/16 - B A Rn C I D - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Knyght, Valentine Knyght alias Kett, John Nevell, William Chace, Nicholas Banister et al
  • STAC 5/W16/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Valentine Kett
  • STAC 5/W18/14 - Rn - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Botie, John Nevell et al
  • STAC 5/W4/26 - B A Rr - Trin 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Henry Knevett, Edmund Knevett, Anthony Knevett, John Neville, Richard Watts, William Guilder et al

X

Y

Yarmouth Corporation v Bettys

  • STAC 5/Y2/4 - B - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Jurats and Burgesses of Yarmouth v Thomas Bettys, John Pidgeon et al

Yarmouth Corporation v Gunvile

  • STAC 5/B103/16 - B A Rn - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - John Burforth, Ambrose Bullard v Henry Gunoyle et al
  • STAC 5/Y2/11 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvile et al
  • STAC 5/Y4/2 - Rn - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvyle
  • STAC 5/U3/2 - C I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - John Uffar, Ambrose Bullward v Henry Gunvyle, Robert Candler et al

Yarmouth Corporation v Wylde

  • STAC 5/Y1/14 - B Dr - Hil 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Comomalty of Yarmouth, v William Wylde, John Wylde, Nathaniell Arnold, Matthew Fullgood, Robert Ward et al

Z

Almoner

Almoner v Blundeville

  • STAC 5/A2/32 - B A - Hil 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v John Blundeville et uxor
    • Andrew Green late of Catfeild Norfolk. Hanged himself. felo de se.
    • see also STAC Blundeville

Almoner Foster '

  • STAC 5/A59/10 - B - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v Thomas Foster, Henry Brigg
  • STAC 5/A59/10 - In re Thomas Brigges of Hingham in county Norfolk felo de se

‘’' Almoner v Goldman

  • STAC 5/A3/36 - B A - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v Robert Goldman
    • One Steven Meade late of Rewton or Beston neare unto the sea side in Norfolk. felo de se.
    • see also STAC Goldman

Almoner v Hall

  • STAC 5/A3/34 - B - - Norfolk - Almoner v William Hall, Francis Leggate
    • Henry Shrympling and Adame Elger late of Tyrinton St Jones [Terrington St Johns] in Norfolk. both felo de se.
    • see also STAC Hall

Almoner v Lowcock

  • STAC 5/A6/8 - B - 39 Eliz - Derbyshire, Norfolk - Almoner v William Lowecock
    • Edmond Stephenson late of Dronfield co Derby gent felo de se. Drowned himself in Norfolk in a river near Norwich.
    • see also STAC Lowcock and STAC Harruppe

Almoner v Moore

  • STAC 7/1/10 - B - - Norfolk - Almoner (Edmund, bishop of Rochester) v Thomas Moore
    • TNA Note: Hingham: Goods of [blank] Forde, suicide.
    • see also STAC Moore

Almoner v Perryman

  • STAC 5/A5/18 - B A - - Norfolk - Almoner v Hugh Perryman
    • Walter Vyncent late of Esson [? Easton] in Norfolk felo de se.
    • see also STAC Perryman

Almoner v Pleasants

  • STAC 5/A4/33 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Pleasants, William Harebrowne, John Mingey, John Howes
    • Richard Banges of the City of Norwich tanner drowned himself, felo de se.
  • STAC 5/A39/8 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Plesaunce
    • Bond by Richard Banges of Norwich to John Mingey of Norwich apothecary.
    • see also STAC Pleasants

Attorney General

AG v Abrahan

  • STAC 5/A39/24 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Robert Abrahan

AG v Bowler

  • STAC 5/A39/5 - B A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v James Bowler.
    • Transcription STAC 5/A39/5
    • Corruption in the levying of troops
  • STAC 5/A50/33 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v James Bowler

AG v Framingham

  • STAC 5/A47/10 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v George Framingham
  • STAC 5/A11/35 - A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v George Framyngham et al

AG v Fryer

  • STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
  • STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer
    • Thetford - Refusal of the Oath of Obedience
  • STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford
  • STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Frise

AG v Gibson

  • STAC 5/A32/30 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gibson et uxor, Judeth Wilson, John Thompson, John Beamond, Simon Davye et al
    • Norwich. Eight separate Answers.
  • STAC 5/A26/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Margaret Gybson et al
  • STAC 5/A19/32 - I - - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gybson

AG v Gresham and Clere

  • STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Cleare
  • STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
    • Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich).
    • Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.
    • Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General. Answer of Edward Clere. Answer of Thomas Sego. Demurrer of William Gressham
  • STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al

AG v Harward

AG v Heveningham

  • STAC 5/A6/25 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Sir Arthur Heveningham
    • Interrogatories to be ministered to Sir Arthur Heveningham knight on the part and behalf of HM. Imp did not the Lords of HM most hon PC about the one and thirty yeare of HM raygne direct ther letters to you Sir Arthur Heveningham, Sir Edward Cleer, Sir Robert Southwell knights, Thomas Farmore, William Rugge and Charles Cornwales esquires to examine and ende a cause betwene Thomas Thwayte of Hardingham in Norfolk esq & Richard Thwaites one of the younger sons of the said Thomas of the one parte and Antony Thwayte eldest son of the said Thomas & Francis the wife of the said Anthony on the other parte according to equitie etc.
    • see also STAC Heveningham

AG v Jermyn

  • STAC 5/A57/31 - B A - - Norfolk - AG v Francis Jermyne, Richard Jones et al
  • STAC 5/A15/8 - I D - 8 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Francis Jermye et al

AG v Jermyn

  • STAC 5/A2/40 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmond Jermyn, Robert Bateman, Rowland Thompson, Thomas Worth et al
  • STAC 5/A11/16 - A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmund Jermyn et al

AG v Parker

  • STAC 5/A37/30 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Parker, Richard Witherley, James Lynne, John Sadde, John Pigeon, Robert Jeffryes
    • Bill. Mattishall co Norfolk. the defendants are men of very badd lewd riotous and uncyvill behavour. Answer of John Pigeon gent . Answer of Parker, Witherley and Sadd
    • see also STAC Parker

AG v Pigeon

  • STAC 5/A55/37 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon et al
    • Wymondham, Norfolk - STAC 5/A55/37
  • STAC 5/A17/8 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
  • STAC 5/A22/29 - Rr - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
  • STAC 5/A28/16 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, Richard Witherley, John Parker et al

AG v Pott

  • STAC 5/A55/20 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Philip Potte, John Potte, Emanuel Calland
  • STAC 5/A43/17 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Philip Pott et al
  • STAC 5/A47/9 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Potte et al
    • Interrs ref Chancery proceedings re manors of Noers als Nothe and Mannington or Wolterton, and lands in Itringham, Norfolk.(dk)
    • see also STAC Pott

AG v Terrold

  • STAC 5/A1/39 - A Rn C I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaits, Thomas Amides, William Terold
  • STAC 5/A46/5 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaytes, Thomas Amyas et al
  • STAC 7/17/55 - - - Norfolk - AG v William Terolde et al

AG v Thwaites

  • STAC 5/A6/27 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Bridget Thwaits, Thomas Cooper, Robert Cooper
    • Examinations taken at Hardingham co Norfolk 25 Sept 40 Eliz before Danyell Rieve DD, Martyn Sidley esq, Thomas Thetford esq [in the case] between William Terrold, Richard Thwaite et al Defs and Edward Cooke AG compl. Interrogatories to be ministered to Bridgett Thwaites widdowe Thomas Cooper yeoman, Robert Cooper yeoman on the part of William Terrold, Richard Thwaites and Thomas Amyas, three of the defs to the information of Edward Cooke AG. Depostion of Thomas Cowper of Depeham co Norfolk aged 60: that he hath heard that there were letters directed to certain knights and esquires in the said county from the lords of HM PC authorizing thaen therby to here and determine all matters of controversy that were then betwene Thomas Thwaites of Hardingham and Anthony his eldest sonne.
    • see also STAC Thwaits

AG v Wharton

  • STAC 5/A55/36 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martyn Wharton et al
  • STAC 5/A8/22 - I - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martin Wharton, Thomas Norfor et al
    • Ingrossing of grain, many many answers including one by Robert Pooke citizen and aldermen of Norwich.
    • see also STAC Wharton

AG v Whitehand

  • STAC 7/1/5 - B A - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - AG (Edward Coke) v Ralph Whitehand, Edward Ralf
    • Bill date 6 Nov Anno 44 Eliz
    • TNA Note: Forgery of warrants and bonds.
  • STAC 5/A47/36 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Ralfe Whithand
  • STAC 5/A44/14 - I D - 45 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Raphe Whitehand, John Clybury

AG v Worlock

  • STAC 5/A47/27 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Worlock, Raph Mason, Thomas Berry
    • Raphe Mason & Thomas Berrye, Queen's messengers, sent with a warrant to Norfolk, to bring certain persons up to Lord Hunsdon. Inserted names of innocent parties and attempted to charge them to have their names removed.(dk)
    • see also STAC Worlock


Palmer's cumulative totals of Star Chamber fines preserved in the E159s (rp)

  • TNA E159/367 Easter Term, 16 Elizabeth. Fine paid
    • From John Blofield de Cromer, Norf: £59 3s 4d.
  • TNA E159/375 Trinity Term, 20 Elizabeth. Fine paid
    • From Christofer Graunte de Lynne, Norf: £50.
    • From John Pell de Lynne, Norf: £66 13s 4d.
    • From John Smythe: £20.
  • TNA E159/377 Trinity Term, 21 Elizabeth. Fine paid
    • From Roger Woodhouse de Kymberley, Norf, knight: £10.
    • From the same Roger Woodhouse: 100 marks.
    • From Thome Love, servant to the same Roger: £3 6s 8d.
    • From Nicholas Pattrick de Carleton Rode, Norf: £3 6s 8d.
    • From Robert Jolly of Old Buckenham, Norf: £3 6s 8d.
    • From Thomas Cooper, servant to the same Roger: £3 6s 8d.
    • From William Wharton, servant to the same Roger: £3 6s 8d.
    • From William Mychell, servant to the same Roger: £3 6s 8d.
    • From Richard Pyle de Salton Rode, Norf: £3 6s 8d.
    • From Peter Reader de Buckenham: £3 6s 8d.
    • From Adam Barbour de Buckenham: £3 6s 8d.
    • From Samuel Carman de Thranston, Suff: £3 6s 8d.
    • From Thomas Wamtrell, servant to the same Roger: £3 6s 8d.
  • TNA E159/387 Easter Term, 26 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1584
    • From Robert Burwell de Wyndham, Norf: £50.
    • From John Kett de Wyndham, Norf; £10.
    • From John Smyth de Wyndham, Norf: £5
  • TNA E159/406 Michaelmas Term, 35-36 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1593
    • From William Frankelin de Rowlesby, Norf: £50.
    • From Thomas Eden de Marcham, Norf: £50.
    • From Anthony Eden de Marcham, Norf: £10.
    • From Bartholomew Eden de Marcham, Norf: £10.
    • From John Marche de Marcham, Norf: £10.
  • TNA E159/408 Michaelmas Term, 36-37 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1594
    • From Henry Rolff de ____, Norf: £10.
    • From Richard Cokey de Groton, Suff: £20.
  • TNA E159/410 Hilary Term, 38 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1596
    • From Thomas Harwood alias Hayward de Albrough, Norf, gent: £300.
    • From Thomas Funston de Windham, Norf: £40.
    • From John Hamond de Gelston, Norf: £40.
    • From John Botewright de Frisingfeld, Suff,yeoman: £20.
    • From Edward Cleere de Thetford, Norf, armiger: £20.
    • From John Browne de Porland, Norf, yeoman: £20.
    • From Thomas Segoe de Ailesham, Norf: £10.
    • From Edward Newarke de Ketteringham, Norf, yeoman: £10.
    • From John Freman de Shortesham, Norf: £5.
    • From Thomas Hayward of the City of Norwich, gent: £5.
  • TNA E159/411 Easter and Trinity Terms, 38 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1596
    • From Thomas Packe de Harleston, Norf, yeoman: £10.
    • From Richard Freer de Harleston, Norf, gent: 100 marks.
    • From Anthony Freer de Thetford, Norf, gent: £60.
  • TNA E159/412 Michaelmas Terms, 38-39 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1596
    • From Roger Hubbert de Northwoold, Norf, gent: 200 marks.
  • TNA E159/414 Michaelmas Term, 39-40 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1597
    • From Edmund Framlingham de Warham, Norf, yeoman: £100.
    • From Mathias Sotherton of Norwich, gent: 100 marks.
    • From Richard Whalle of the City of Norwich: 100 marks.
    • From William Peck de Fecenham, Norf, gent: £20.
    • From Thomas Bradfield de Mousley, Norf, yeoman: £10.
    • From Thomas Bowde de Paston, Norf, yeoman: £10.
    • From Daniel Shanck de Owbye, Norf, yeoman: £5.
    • From Robert Cubitt de Bradfeld, Norf, yeoman: £10.
    • From Edward Hilton de Lingwood, Norf, cleric: £20.
    • From William Shill de Framlingham, Suff, yeoman: £20.
    • From John Terrett de Wickham Market, Suff, yeoman: £20.
    • From Robert Borrett de Wilbye, Suff, yeoman: £20.
  • TNA E159/416 Hilary Term, 40 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1598
    • From Richard Westgate de Sething, Norf: £40.
    • From Edward Kirkham and Peter Baynes de le Stronde, Middx: £40.
  • TNA Trinity Term, 40 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1598
    • From Richard Wattes de Barforde, Norf: £40.
    • From John Page de Barforde, Norf: £40.
  • TNA E159/416 Michaelmas Term, 40-41 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1598
    • From Richard Astley de Thetforde, Norf, gent: £5.
    • From Anthony Freer de Thetforde, Norf, gent: £5.
  • TNA E159/417 Michaelmas Term, 40-41 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1598
    • From William Downinge de martham, Norf, gent: £30.
  • TNA E159/416 Hilary Term, 41 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1599
    • From Thomas Warner de Wynfarthing, Norf: £20.
  • TNA E159/418 Michaelmas Term, 41-42 Michaelmas. Fine Paid 1599
    • From Laurence Costerdyne de Tybenham, Norf: £50.
    • From Abraham Corker late of Tybenham, Norf: £50.
    • From William Seaman de Tybenham, Norf, clothier: £20.
  • TNA E159/420 Michaelmas Term, 42-43 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1600
    • From William Bennett de Suffield, Norf, cleric: £100.
  • TNA E159/421 Michaelmas Term, 42-43 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1600
    • From William Goodrycke de Ribston, Yorks, gent: £40.
    • From Drugo Asteley de Thetford, Norf, gent: £40.
  • TNA E159/421 Michaelmas Term, 43-44 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1601
    • From William Bennett de Carleton, Norf: £50.
    • From Thomas Bennett de Linge, Norf: £50.
    • From Richard Brigges de Carleton, Norf, carpenter: £10.
    • From Robert Isbells of New Buckingham, Norf: £10.
    • From William Bullytout de Carleton, Norf, yeoman: £10.
    • From Thomas Yongman de Carlton Rood, Norf, weaver and From Fide Youngman, wife of said Thomas Youngman: £15.
    • From Henry Spencer de Carleton, Norf, yeoman: £10.
    • From William Rumbold de Larling, Norf, husbandman: £5.
    • From Robert Pytman de Carleton, Norf, laborer: £5.
    • From Robert Sommer de Barneham Brome, Norf: £5.
    • From James Burden de Rowdham, Norf, yeoman: £5.
    • From Henry Catten de Disheywood, Norf, yeoman: £10.
  • TNA E159/421 Michaelmas Term, 43-44 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1601
    • From Stephen Baxter de Harleston, Norf, yeoman: £20.