Difference between revisions of "STAC co Norfolk"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''' Norfolk '''  
 
''' Norfolk '''  
  
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
+
*Aldham v Harvey
 +
*Allen v Playford
 +
*Allyson v Richman
 +
*Anguish v Nicholas
 +
*Armiger v Whitney - Armiger v Barber
 +
*Artis v Ashill
 +
*Baldrey v Ward
 +
*Becker v Neave
 +
*Beckham v Halman and Crane
 +
*Blenerhasset v Sayers
 +
*Cobbe v Hunt - Cobbe v Radcliffe
 +
*Cooke v Jewell
 +
*Cooper v Goose
 +
*Coppin v Palmer
 +
*Cornwallis v Gesh and Pinner
 +
*Cromwell v Tavernor
 +
*Crosse v Futter
 +
*Curdey v Skeet
 +
*Curtis v Evance
 +
*Dereham v Barton
 +
*Eden v Downing
 +
*Evans v Newbie
 +
*Farmor v Grimston - Farmor v Haydon
 +
*Fawcett v Woolman, Boston and Sharpe
 +
*Fenn v Flowerdew
 +
*Fenton v Wright
 +
*Fiske v Goldsmith and Gaunt
 +
*Flatman v Ward and Pigeon - Flatman v Carter - Flatman v Flatman
 +
*Forest v Lacy and Booth
 +
*Fulhurste v Vowell
 +
*Fuller v Dalton and Elmer
 +
*Gurboldsham v Muskett
 +
*Howard v Mulley
 +
*Hunt v Whiting
 +
*Ireland v Wright and Bright
 +
*Jennor v Fairfax
 +
*Jervis v Tubbard
 +
*Johnson v Smyth
 +
*Jubye v Youngman
 +
*Killingtree v Pell
 +
*Knyvett v Burgess and Ryder - Knyvett v Dixon
 +
*Marsham v Brampton
 +
*Parfrey v Stokes
 +
*Ragland v Yelverton
 +
*Ramsay v Fawcett
 +
*Reade v Adamson - Reade v Green and Britton
 +
*Rigdon v Constable
 +
*Rosse v Shinkwin
 +
*Russe v Franklin
 +
*Smith v Woodhouse
 +
*Sporeley v Makender
 +
*Taverner v Thompson
 +
*Thetford Corporation v Bassingwaite
 +
*Tymperley v Themilthorpe
 +
*Trindle v Woodhouse
 +
*Whitney v Gest
 +
*Woodhouse v Kett
 +
*Yarmouth Corporation v Bettys - Yarmouth Corporation v Gunvile - Yarmouth Corporation v Wylde
 +
*Almoner v Blundeville - Almoner v Goldman - Almoner v Hall - Almoner v Lowcock - Almoner v Moore - Almoner v Perryman - Almoner v Pleasants
 +
*AG v Abrahan - AG v Fryer - AG v Gresham and Clere - AG v Gibson - AG v Harward - AG v Heveningham - AG v Jermyn - AG v Pigeon - AG v Terrold - AG v Thwaites - AG v Wharton - AG v Whitehand
 +
 
 +
''' NOTA BENE ''' - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.  
 +
 
 +
''' A '''
  
 
''' Aldham v Harvey '''  
 
''' Aldham v Harvey '''  
 
*Wramplingham co Norfolk. STAC 5/A4/17
 
*Wramplingham co Norfolk. STAC 5/A4/17
 
*STAC 5/A4/17 - B A - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Aldham v John Harvye, Anthony Bennyt, Thomas Hallyet et al
 
*STAC 5/A4/17 - B A - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Aldham v John Harvye, Anthony Bennyt, Thomas Hallyet et al
*STAC 5/A16 /11 - I D - 24 Eliz - Henry Aldehn v John Harvy
+
*STAC 5/A16 /11 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Aldehn v John Harvy
 
*see also [[STAC Aldham]]
 
*see also [[STAC Aldham]]
  
Line 30: Line 93:
 
''' Armiger v Whitney '''  
 
''' Armiger v Whitney '''  
 
*Possibly Burnham and [King's] Lynne, Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/4
 
*Possibly Burnham and [King's] Lynne, Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/4
*STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
+
*STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
*STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al
+
*STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al
 
*see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
  
Line 37: Line 100:
 
*William Arminger the elder of North Creake in Norfolk gentleman. In re the manor of Hillham in Holkham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A3/26  
 
*William Arminger the elder of North Creake in Norfolk gentleman. In re the manor of Hillham in Holkham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A3/26  
 
*STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al  
 
*STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al  
*STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - - William Armiger v John Barber et al
+
*STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v John Barber et al
*STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
+
*STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
*STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al
+
*STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al
 
*see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
  
 
''' Artis v Ashill '''  
 
''' Artis v Ashill '''  
 
*John Ashill clerk def parson of Bodney co Norfolk. STAC 5/A6/24
 
*John Ashill clerk def parson of Bodney co Norfolk. STAC 5/A6/24
*STAC 5/A16/18 - B A Rn I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Antys v John Ashyll et al
+
*STAC 5/A16/18 - B A Rn I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Antys v John Ashyll et al
 
*STAC 5/A6/24 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill
 
*STAC 5/A6/24 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill
*STAC 5/A43/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
+
*STAC 5/A43/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
*STAC 5/A24/4 - I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
+
*STAC 5/A24/4 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
*STAC 5/A42/19 - I D - 28 Eliz - Robert Artis v Robert Purdye, John Ashill
+
*STAC 5/A42/19 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artis v Robert Purdye, John Ashill
 
*see also [[STAC Artis]]
 
*see also [[STAC Artis]]
 +
 +
''' B '''
  
 
''' Baldrey v Ward '''  
 
''' Baldrey v Ward '''  
Line 58: Line 123:
 
''' Becker v Neave '''
 
''' Becker v Neave '''
 
*Norfolk. Interrogatories to be administered on behalf of Roose Becker complt against Wyllm Neale . . . Thomas Bretton, Thomas Neale, Thomas Becker & Elinor his wife, Thomas Wyth.., John Alyson, Rauffe Symes & Edmund Crell.. defts. Complt is widow of Wyllm Becker of ?Suttyngton?, Norfolk. STAC 5/B67/18
 
*Norfolk. Interrogatories to be administered on behalf of Roose Becker complt against Wyllm Neale . . . Thomas Bretton, Thomas Neale, Thomas Becker & Elinor his wife, Thomas Wyth.., John Alyson, Rauffe Symes & Edmund Crell.. defts. Complt is widow of Wyllm Becker of ?Suttyngton?, Norfolk. STAC 5/B67/18
*STAC 5/B7/12 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - - Rose Becker v William Neve, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Becker et al
+
*STAC 5/B7/12 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Rose Becker v William Neve, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Becker et al
 
*STAC 5/B67/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Roose Becker v Thomas Neave, William Neave, Thomas Bretton
 
*STAC 5/B67/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Roose Becker v Thomas Neave, William Neave, Thomas Bretton
 
*see also [[STAC Becker]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Becker]]  
Line 68: Line 133:
 
**Answers of Isabell (otherwise Elizabeth) Paynter widow to the bill of complaint of Richard Beckham.  
 
**Answers of Isabell (otherwise Elizabeth) Paynter widow to the bill of complaint of Richard Beckham.  
 
**Answers of Robarte Crane, Edmunde Halman, John Halman & Thomas Halman
 
**Answers of Robarte Crane, Edmunde Halman, John Halman & Thomas Halman
*STAC 5/B99/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v John Halman, Thomas Halrnan
+
*STAC 5/B99/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v John Halman, Thomas Halrnan
*STAC 5/B16/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
+
*STAC 5/B16/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
*STAC 5/B103/9 - Rn - 34 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane, Edmund Halman et al
+
*STAC 5/B103/9 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane, Edmund Halman et al
*STAC 7/18/23 - - - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
+
*STAC 7/18/23 - - - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
 
*see also [[STAC Beckham]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Beckham]]  
  
 
''' Blenerhasset v Sayers '''
 
''' Blenerhasset v Sayers '''
*STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
+
*STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
*STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
+
*STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
*STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
+
*STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
*STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
+
*STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
 
*STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
 
*STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
 
*see also [[STAC Blenerhasset]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Blenerhasset]]  
 +
 +
''' C '''
  
 
''' Cobbe v Hunt '''  
 
''' Cobbe v Hunt '''  
 
*In re land in Wolverton Norfolk. STAC 5/C14/12
 
*In re land in Wolverton Norfolk. STAC 5/C14/12
*STAC 5/C20/37 - B - 43 Eliz - William Cobbe v Edmund Grownde et uxor, John Hunt et uxor et al  
+
*STAC 5/C20/37 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobbe v Edmund Grownde et uxor, John Hunt et uxor et al  
 
*STAC 5/C14/12 - B A Rn - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobbe v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor et al  
 
*STAC 5/C14/12 - B A Rn - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobbe v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor et al  
*STAC 5/C7/37 - I Dn - 44 Eliz - William Cobb v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor, John Souckton et uxor, Christopher Goodman et al  
+
*STAC 5/C7/37 - I Dn - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobb v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor, John Souckton et uxor, Christopher Goodman et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Cobbe]]
 
*see also [[STAC Cobbe]]
  
Line 97: Line 164:
 
''' Cooke v Jewell '''  
 
''' Cooke v Jewell '''  
 
*William Coke of Walcoote [Walcott] in Norfolk yeoman, two and a half acres of land in Estruston [East Ruston] Norfolk. STAC 5/C3/25
 
*William Coke of Walcoote [Walcott] in Norfolk yeoman, two and a half acres of land in Estruston [East Ruston] Norfolk. STAC 5/C3/25
*STAC 5/C3/25 - B C A - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - - William Coke v Edmund Jewell et uxor, Thomas Jewell
+
*STAC 5/C3/25 - B C A - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coke v Edmund Jewell et uxor, Thomas Jewell
 
*see also [[STAC Cooke]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Cooke]]  
  
 
''' Cooper v Goose '''  
 
''' Cooper v Goose '''  
 
*Isaac Cooper of Yarmouth in Norfolk merchant. Inheritance dispute. STAC 5/C3/12
 
*Isaac Cooper of Yarmouth in Norfolk merchant. Inheritance dispute. STAC 5/C3/12
*STAC 5/C3/12 - B A - Mich 44/45 Eliz - - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose, George Goose
+
*STAC 5/C3/12 - B A - Mich 44/45 Eliz - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose, George Goose
*STAC 5/C10/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - - John Cowper v William Goose, George Goose
+
*STAC 5/C10/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - John Cowper v William Goose, George Goose
*STAC 10/2/4 - Rn - - - - Isaac Cooper v William Goose and George Goose
+
*STAC 10/2/4 - Rn - - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose and George Goose
 
*see also [[STAC Cooper]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Cooper]]  
  
Line 120: Line 187:
 
*STAC 5/C1/24 - B A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleys v Simon Gesh, John Pinner, John Smith, William Browett
 
*STAC 5/C1/24 - B A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleys v Simon Gesh, John Pinner, John Smith, William Browett
 
*STAC 7/11/11 - - - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleis v Simon Gest, John Pynner
 
*STAC 7/11/11 - - - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleis v Simon Gest, John Pynner
*STAC 5/C72/1 - B A - 39 Eliz - - Charles Conwallis v William Le Gris, Robert Cottrell
+
*STAC 5/C72/1 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Conwallis v William Le Gris, Robert Cottrell
 
*see also [[STAC Cornwallis]]
 
*see also [[STAC Cornwallis]]
  
Line 129: Line 196:
 
*STAC 5/C30/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor
 
*STAC 5/C30/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor
 
*STAC 5/C58/5 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
 
*STAC 5/C58/5 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
*STAC 5/C78/14 - I - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Taverner
+
*STAC 5/C78/14 - I - - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Taverner
 
*STAC 5/C73/3 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
 
*STAC 5/C73/3 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
 
*STAC 5/C45/36 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Crumwell v James Taverner et al  
 
*STAC 5/C45/36 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Crumwell v James Taverner et al  
 
*STAC 5/C32/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v John Browne
 
*STAC 5/C32/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v John Browne
 
*STAC 5/C38/21 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
 
*STAC 5/C38/21 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
*STAC 5/C28/3 - I D - 23 Eliz - - Lord Cromwell v Edward Daulton, Val(entine) Hartoppe, Martyn Arden et al  
+
*STAC 5/C28/3 - I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v Edward Daulton, Val(entine) Hartoppe, Martyn Arden et al  
 
*STAC 5/C42/9 - B A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v Thomas Steward, John Taverner et al  
 
*STAC 5/C42/9 - B A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v Thomas Steward, John Taverner et al  
*STAC 5/C53/16 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Lord Crumwell v Thomas Steward
+
*STAC 5/C53/16 - I D - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v Thomas Steward
*STAC 5/C74/14 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Lord Cromwell v Roger Townshend
+
*STAC 5/C74/14 - I D - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v Roger Townshend
 
*see also [[STAC Cromwell]] see also [[STAC Taverner]]
 
*see also [[STAC Cromwell]] see also [[STAC Taverner]]
 +
 +
''' Crosse v Futter '''
 +
*Depositions of Nicholas ?Parker? and others. Messuage in Bryssingham, Norfolk.(dk) STAC 5/C78/13
 +
*STAC 5/C78/13 - D - 1 Eliz - Norfolk - [blank] Crosse v [blank] Futter et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Cross]]
  
 
''' Curdey v Skeet '''   
 
''' Curdey v Skeet '''   
Line 151: Line 223:
 
*STAC 5/C3/5 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Curteis v Edmond Evance, Thomas Burton. Transcribed [[STAC 5/C3/5]]
 
*STAC 5/C3/5 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Curteis v Edmond Evance, Thomas Burton. Transcribed [[STAC 5/C3/5]]
 
*see also [[STAC Curtis]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Curtis]]  
 +
 +
''' D '''
  
 
''' Dereham v Barton '''  
 
''' Dereham v Barton '''  
Line 160: Line 234:
 
*STAC 7/20/25 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Derham v Peter Barton et al
 
*STAC 7/20/25 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Derham v Peter Barton et al
 
*see also [[STAC Dereham]]
 
*see also [[STAC Dereham]]
 +
 +
''' E '''
  
 
''' Eden v Downing '''
 
''' Eden v Downing '''
 
*Thomas Edon of Martham co Norfolk yeoman. Whereas the Dean and Chapter of Norwich owned the rectory of Martham and the parsonage house. 21 year lease to complainant.  Answer of William Downinge gent. Now so it is may it please your most excellent Majesty that Wm Downing gent, Edward Browne, Simonde Sippens, Richard Tompson, and Robert Buclingham and divers other persons to your said subject unknown, hot [having] the fear of god before their eis nor any dutiful regard to your Majesties good and godlie laws upon the 9th day of may now last passed did in warlike disorderlie and unlawfull manner assemble and bande themsellves together at Martham. And upon the said day with force and arms that is to say with swords halberts morris pykes piked staves and divers other weapons as well invasive as defensive into the said messuage called the parsonage house forcible riotously and unlawfully did break and enter. And one Anthony Edon and one Richarde Wattes then [being in] the said messuage by the appointment and commandment of your said subject did beat wound and evell intreat. STAC 5/E1/14
 
*Thomas Edon of Martham co Norfolk yeoman. Whereas the Dean and Chapter of Norwich owned the rectory of Martham and the parsonage house. 21 year lease to complainant.  Answer of William Downinge gent. Now so it is may it please your most excellent Majesty that Wm Downing gent, Edward Browne, Simonde Sippens, Richard Tompson, and Robert Buclingham and divers other persons to your said subject unknown, hot [having] the fear of god before their eis nor any dutiful regard to your Majesties good and godlie laws upon the 9th day of may now last passed did in warlike disorderlie and unlawfull manner assemble and bande themsellves together at Martham. And upon the said day with force and arms that is to say with swords halberts morris pykes piked staves and divers other weapons as well invasive as defensive into the said messuage called the parsonage house forcible riotously and unlawfully did break and enter. And one Anthony Edon and one Richarde Wattes then [being in] the said messuage by the appointment and commandment of your said subject did beat wound and evell intreat. STAC 5/E1/14
*STAC 5/E15/33 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Eden v William Downing Edward Browne et al
+
*STAC 5/E15/33 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden v William Downing Edward Browne et al
*STAC 5/E11/38 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v William Doewning, Henry Wilcocks, Robert Hall et al  
+
*STAC 5/E11/38 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v William Doewning, Henry Wilcocks, Robert Hall et al  
*STAC 5/E13/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Edon v William Downinge, Edward Browne
+
*STAC 5/E13/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Edon v William Downinge, Edward Browne
*STAC 5/E14/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Henry Willcock, William Downing, Robert Layton
+
*STAC 5/E14/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Henry Willcock, William Downing, Robert Layton
 
*STAC 5/E1/14 - B A Rn Rr - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden v William Downing, Edward Brown, Simon Sippens, Richard Thompson et al
 
*STAC 5/E1/14 - B A Rn Rr - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden v William Downing, Edward Brown, Simon Sippens, Richard Thompson et al
*STAC 5/E2/5 - A - 33 Eliz - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Robert Burlingham
+
*STAC 5/E2/5 - A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Robert Burlingham
 
*see also [[STAC Eden]]
 
*see also [[STAC Eden]]
  
Line 174: Line 250:
 
*Thomas Evans of the parish of Saxtropte [Saxthorpe?] co Norfolk. Two water mills for the grinding of Corn and one other mill for fullinge of Clothe scituate and being within the parish of Horsteed [Horstead] co Norfolk. Forcible entry and ejection. STAC 5/E1/12
 
*Thomas Evans of the parish of Saxtropte [Saxthorpe?] co Norfolk. Two water mills for the grinding of Corn and one other mill for fullinge of Clothe scituate and being within the parish of Horsteed [Horstead] co Norfolk. Forcible entry and ejection. STAC 5/E1/12
 
*STAC 5/E1/12 - B - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Evans v Edmund Newbie, Robert Usher, Nicholas Kent, Robert Blenkinsop alias Sextus, John Mower, Clement Warnes, William Tompson [  ] Davison  
 
*STAC 5/E1/12 - B - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Evans v Edmund Newbie, Robert Usher, Nicholas Kent, Robert Blenkinsop alias Sextus, John Mower, Clement Warnes, William Tompson [  ] Davison  
*STAC 5/E9/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Evans v Edmond Newby et al
+
*STAC 5/E9/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Evans v Edmond Newby et al
 
*see also [[STAC Evans]]
 
*see also [[STAC Evans]]
 +
 +
''' F '''
  
 
''' Farmor v Haydon '''
 
''' Farmor v Haydon '''
Line 185: Line 263:
 
''' Farmor v Grimston '''
 
''' Farmor v Grimston '''
 
*STAC 5/F3/19 - B A - Hli 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grympston. Transcription [[STAC 5/F3/19]]
 
*STAC 5/F3/19 - B A - Hli 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grympston. Transcription [[STAC 5/F3/19]]
*STAC 5/F21/22 - B - 38 Eliz - Thomas Farmer v Christopher Grimeston
+
*STAC 5/F21/22 - B - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Farmer v Christopher Grimeston
*STAC 5/F20/28 - I D - 39 Eliz - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grimston
+
*STAC 5/F20/28 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grimston
*STAC 5/F17/22 - I D - 39 Eliz - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grynston
+
*STAC 5/F17/22 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grynston
 
*see also [[STAC Farmer]]
 
*see also [[STAC Farmer]]
  
Line 223: Line 301:
 
''' Flatman v Ward and Pigeon '''
 
''' Flatman v Ward and Pigeon '''
 
*TNA Note: Norwich: Verdict of deft's, as a jury. STAC 7/12/9
 
*TNA Note: Norwich: Verdict of deft's, as a jury. STAC 7/12/9
*STAC 5/F19/4 - B A - 37 Eliz - - Richard Flatman v William Ward, John Pigeon, Robert Prentice
+
*STAC 5/F19/4 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v William Ward, John Pigeon, Robert Prentice
*STAC 5/F25/23 - B A C - 38 Eliz - - Richard Flattman v William Ward, Robert Prentice et al
+
*STAC 5/F25/23 - B A C - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Flattman v William Ward, Robert Prentice et al
 
*STAC 5/F24/7 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Bigeon, Robert Tyte
 
*STAC 5/F24/7 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Bigeon, Robert Tyte
 
*STAC 7/12/9 - - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Pigeon, John Tyte et al
 
*STAC 7/12/9 - - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Pigeon, John Tyte et al
*STAC 5/F18/22 - I - - - Richard Flatman v Thomas Downing et al
+
*STAC 5/F18/22 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v Thomas Downing et al
*STAC 5/F12/32 - A - 38 Eliz - - Richard Flatman et al v Thomas Downing
+
*STAC 5/F12/32 - A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Flatman et al v Thomas Downing
 
*see also [[STAC Flatman]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Flatman]]  
  
Line 254: Line 332:
 
''' Fuller v Dalton and Elmer '''
 
''' Fuller v Dalton and Elmer '''
 
*Thomas Fuller of Norhold in co Norfolk. Henry Sparrowe and Robart Dalton of the said town yeomen. STAC 5/F3/5  
 
*Thomas Fuller of Norhold in co Norfolk. Henry Sparrowe and Robart Dalton of the said town yeomen. STAC 5/F3/5  
*STAC 5/F7/33 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - - Thomas Fuller v Richard Elemour, Thomas Neale et al
+
*STAC 5/F7/33 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Richard Elemour, Thomas Neale et al
 
*STAC 5/F1/11 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller, Henry Sparrow, Robert Dalton v Richard Elmor, Thomas Neale, Robert Sparrow, Robert Raymond Sr, Robert Raymond Jr
 
*STAC 5/F1/11 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller, Henry Sparrow, Robert Dalton v Richard Elmor, Thomas Neale, Robert Sparrow, Robert Raymond Sr, Robert Raymond Jr
 
*STAC 5/F3/5 - B Dr - Hil 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Dalton, Richard Elmer
 
*STAC 5/F3/5 - B Dr - Hil 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Dalton, Richard Elmer
*STAC 5/F7/14 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Thomas Fuller v Robert Rayner Sr et al
+
*STAC 5/F7/14 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Rayner Sr et al
 
*see also [[STAC Fuller]]
 
*see also [[STAC Fuller]]
 +
 +
''' G '''
  
 
''' Gurboldsham v Muskett '''
 
''' Gurboldsham v Muskett '''
Line 264: Line 344:
 
*STAC 5/G14/1 - B - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - The Parishioners of Gurboldsham all Saints, v William Muskett, Simon Muskett.  
 
*STAC 5/G14/1 - B - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - The Parishioners of Gurboldsham all Saints, v William Muskett, Simon Muskett.  
 
*see also [[STAC Garboldisham]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Garboldisham]]  
 +
 +
''' H '''
  
 
''' Howard v Mulley '''
 
''' Howard v Mulley '''
Line 277: Line 359:
 
*STAC 7/12/37 - - - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Windam, Thomas Wyttye, Walter Whiting, Robert Howse et al
 
*STAC 7/12/37 - - - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Windam, Thomas Wyttye, Walter Whiting, Robert Howse et al
 
*see also [[STAC Hunt]]
 
*see also [[STAC Hunt]]
 +
 +
''' I J '''
  
 
''' Ireland v Wright and Bright '''
 
''' Ireland v Wright and Bright '''
 
*The Complainant was in the Fleet prison at the suit of Thomas Tooley on a forged bond. Deposition of Thomas Bleverhassell of the City of Norwich. STAC 5/J3/20  
 
*The Complainant was in the Fleet prison at the suit of Thomas Tooley on a forged bond. Deposition of Thomas Bleverhassell of the City of Norwich. STAC 5/J3/20  
*STAC 5/J7/28 - B A - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
+
*STAC 5/J7/28 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
 
*STAC 5/J3/20 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
 
*STAC 5/J3/20 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
*STAC 5/J15/39 - Rn - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Peter Bright, Thomas Wright, Thomas Buxley
+
*STAC 5/J15/39 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, Thomas Wright, Thomas Buxley
*STAC 5/J20/32 - I D - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v Thomas Wright, Peter Bright et al
+
*STAC 5/J20/32 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Thomas Wright, Peter Bright et al
*STAC 5/J22/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - William Ireland v John Puxley, Thomas Wright et al
+
*STAC 5/J22/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v John Puxley, Thomas Wright et al
 
*see also [[STAC Ireland]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Ireland]]  
  
Line 291: Line 375:
 
*STAC 5/J7/30 - B A Rn - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v Thomas Jennor, John Jennor, William Fayrefax
 
*STAC 5/J7/30 - B A Rn - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v Thomas Jennor, John Jennor, William Fayrefax
 
*STAC 5/J4/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v William Fairfax et al
 
*STAC 5/J4/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v William Fairfax et al
*STAC 5/J14/30 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Jennor, Margery Jennor v William Raynface
+
*STAC 5/J14/30 - I D - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor, Margery Jennor v William Raynface
 
*see also [[STAC Jenner]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Jenner]]  
  
Line 297: Line 381:
 
*Messuage in Felbrigge Norfolk. STAC 5/J3/16  
 
*Messuage in Felbrigge Norfolk. STAC 5/J3/16  
 
*STAC 5/J3/16 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervys, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henbury
 
*STAC 5/J3/16 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervys, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henbury
*STAC 5/J7/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - William Jervis, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henburye
+
*STAC 5/J7/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervis, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henburye
*STAC 5/J13/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - William Jearvens v Christopher Henbery, Edward Tubberd
+
*STAC 5/J13/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jearvens v Christopher Henbery, Edward Tubberd
 
*see also [[STAC Jervais]]
 
*see also [[STAC Jervais]]
  
Line 312: Line 396:
 
*STAC 5/J15/33 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jewbie v Thomas Youngman, William Youngman, William Jewbie
 
*STAC 5/J15/33 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jewbie v Thomas Youngman, William Youngman, William Jewbie
 
*see also  [[STAC Jubey]]  
 
*see also  [[STAC Jubey]]  
 +
 +
''' K '''
  
 
''' Killingtree v Pell '''
 
''' Killingtree v Pell '''
Line 321: Line 407:
 
''' Knyvett v Dixon '''
 
''' Knyvett v Dixon '''
 
*Depositions taken in Norwich. STAC 5/K4/34  
 
*Depositions taken in Norwich. STAC 5/K4/34  
*STAC 5/K8/32 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Thomas Knyvett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
+
*STAC 5/K8/32 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
*STAC 5/K5/30 - I D - 24 Eliz - Thomas Knivett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
+
*STAC 5/K5/30 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knivett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
 
*STAC 5/K4/34 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Richard Ringwood, Ralph Dixon et al
 
*STAC 5/K4/34 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Richard Ringwood, Ralph Dixon et al
 
*see also [[STAC Knivett]]
 
*see also [[STAC Knivett]]
Line 329: Line 415:
 
*Sir Thomas Knivett of Asshwelthorpe Hall Norfolk. STAC 5/K2/8  
 
*Sir Thomas Knivett of Asshwelthorpe Hall Norfolk. STAC 5/K2/8  
 
*STAC 5/K2/8 - B A I D - Easter 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knivett v John Botye, John Burge Jr, William Rider, Robert Keene, George Browne
 
*STAC 5/K2/8 - B A I D - Easter 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knivett v John Botye, John Burge Jr, William Rider, Robert Keene, George Browne
*STAC 5/K3/5 - I D - 32 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v Thomas Burgess, John Burgess et al
+
*STAC 5/K3/5 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v Thomas Burgess, John Burgess et al
*STAC 5/K7/12 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burghe, William Rider et al
+
*STAC 5/K7/12 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burghe, William Rider et al
*STAC 5/K14/32 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burgess, William Ryder et al
+
*STAC 5/K14/32 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burgess, William Ryder et al
*STAC 5/K6/34 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Thomas Knevett v John Booties Sr, William Ryder
+
*STAC 5/K6/34 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knevett v John Booties Sr, William Ryder
 
*see also [[STAC Knivett]]
 
*see also [[STAC Knivett]]
*
+
 
 
''' L '''  
 
''' L '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' M '''
 +
 
 
''' Marsham v Brampton '''
 
''' Marsham v Brampton '''
 
*STAC 5/M13/13 - B A - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - The inhabitants of the town of Marsham v James Brampton, William Gedney et al
 
*STAC 5/M13/13 - B A - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - The inhabitants of the town of Marsham v James Brampton, William Gedney et al
 
*see also [[STAC Marsham]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Marsham]]  
*
+
 
 
''' N '''  
 
''' N '''  
*
+
 
 
''' O '''  
 
''' O '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' P '''
 +
 
 
''' Parfrey v Stokes '''
 
''' Parfrey v Stokes '''
 
*TNA Note: Wimbotsham: Tithe corn. STAC 7/14/18  
 
*TNA Note: Wimbotsham: Tithe corn. STAC 7/14/18  
Line 353: Line 443:
 
*STAC 7/14/18 - - - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes et al
 
*STAC 7/14/18 - - - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes et al
 
*see also [[STAC Purefey]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Purefey]]  
*
+
 
 
''' Q '''  
 
''' Q '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' R '''
 +
 
 
''' Ragland v Yelverton '''  
 
''' Ragland v Yelverton '''  
 
*Bill of Sir Thomas Ragland of Wallington co Norfolk. Dame Anne his wife deceased was sometime wife of Christopher Conysby Esquire deceased.
 
*Bill of Sir Thomas Ragland of Wallington co Norfolk. Dame Anne his wife deceased was sometime wife of Christopher Conysby Esquire deceased.
 
Ragland owed Wallingford Hall for 16 years since his wife’s death and before that in her right. He was away on business in Glamorgan. William Yelvirston Esq of Rowgham [Rougham] co Norfolk, Thomas Gybbon esq of Lynne co Norfolk, Edward Waters gent of Lynne co Norfolk, Edmond Waters of Lynne co Norfolk, Thomas Might of Flycham [Flitcham] Norfolk Henry Valenger of Lynne gents and John Dalderby of Rowgham yeoman. 20 armed persons. STAC 5/R43/2
 
Ragland owed Wallingford Hall for 16 years since his wife’s death and before that in her right. He was away on business in Glamorgan. William Yelvirston Esq of Rowgham [Rougham] co Norfolk, Thomas Gybbon esq of Lynne co Norfolk, Edward Waters gent of Lynne co Norfolk, Edmond Waters of Lynne co Norfolk, Thomas Might of Flycham [Flitcham] Norfolk Henry Valenger of Lynne gents and John Dalderby of Rowgham yeoman. 20 armed persons. STAC 5/R43/2
 
*STAC 5/R43/2 - B - - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton, Thomas Gybbon et al
 
*STAC 5/R43/2 - B - - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton, Thomas Gybbon et al
*STAC 5/R32/24 - B A Rn Rr - 6 Eliz - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton, Edward Waters et al
+
*STAC 5/R32/24 - B A Rn Rr - 6 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton, Edward Waters et al
*STAC 5/R41/27 - I D - 7 Eliz - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton et al
+
*STAC 5/R41/27 - I D - 7 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton et al
 
*see also [[STAC Ragland]]
 
*see also [[STAC Ragland]]
  
Line 367: Line 459:
 
*John Ramsey of the City of Norwich merchant. STAC 5/R1/27  
 
*John Ramsey of the City of Norwich merchant. STAC 5/R1/27  
 
*STAC 5/R1/27 - B - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsay v William Faucet
 
*STAC 5/R1/27 - B - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsay v William Faucet
*STAC 5/R4/7 - A Rn Rr - 40 Eliz - John Ramsay v William Fawcett
+
*STAC 5/R4/7 - A Rn Rr - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsay v William Fawcett
*STAC 5/R5/20 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Ramsey v William Fawcett
+
*STAC 5/R5/20 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsey v William Fawcett
 
*see also [[STAC Ramsay]]
 
*see also [[STAC Ramsay]]
  
 
''' Reade v Adamson '''  
 
''' Reade v Adamson '''  
 
*Depositions of John Adamson clerk vicar of Gooderstone co Norfolk and Robert Oliver of Hilb. . .  co Norfolk, shepherd. In re a debt due to be paid at the parsonage in Gooderstone. STAC 5/R28/21
 
*Depositions of John Adamson clerk vicar of Gooderstone co Norfolk and Robert Oliver of Hilb. . .  co Norfolk, shepherd. In re a debt due to be paid at the parsonage in Gooderstone. STAC 5/R28/21
*STAC 5/R28/21 - B A Rn - 19 Eliz - William Read, William Bowton v John Adamson, Robert Olyver
+
*STAC 5/R28/21 - B A Rn - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - William Read, William Bowton v John Adamson, Robert Olyver
 
*STAC 5/R43/14 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - William Rede, William Bowton v John Adamson, Robert Oliver (includes STAC 5/B14/3)  
 
*STAC 5/R43/14 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - William Rede, William Bowton v John Adamson, Robert Oliver (includes STAC 5/B14/3)  
 
*see also [[STAC Read]]
 
*see also [[STAC Read]]
Line 390: Line 482:
 
''' Rosse v Shinkwin '''  
 
''' Rosse v Shinkwin '''  
 
*Interrogatories by Rosse to Shinckwyn. Depositions of Firnun Shinkwyn of Etedeareham, Norfolk, husbandman. In re land at Waton Co. Norfolk. John Neave of Graies Inn house and grounds in Weston, Norfolk Thomas Green of the parish of St Buttalls within the liberties of Smithfield saylemaker. Nicholas Hellwys of Weston,  Norfolk. John Jackson of the parish of St Buttolls without Allgate, London.  John Croke servant to Thomas Wood of the parish of St Buttalls without Allgate Scrivener. STAC 5/R1/21
 
*Interrogatories by Rosse to Shinckwyn. Depositions of Firnun Shinkwyn of Etedeareham, Norfolk, husbandman. In re land at Waton Co. Norfolk. John Neave of Graies Inn house and grounds in Weston, Norfolk Thomas Green of the parish of St Buttalls within the liberties of Smithfield saylemaker. Nicholas Hellwys of Weston,  Norfolk. John Jackson of the parish of St Buttolls without Allgate, London.  John Croke servant to Thomas Wood of the parish of St Buttalls without Allgate Scrivener. STAC 5/R1/21
*STAC 5/R30/6 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Robert Rosse v Edmond Shinkvyne
+
*STAC 5/R30/6 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmond Shinkvyne
*STAC 5/R18/13 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkwyne
+
*STAC 5/R18/13 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkwyne
*STAC 5/R9/24 - I D - 42 Eliz - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkquyne
+
*STAC 5/R9/24 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkquyne
*STAC 5/R24/15 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Robert Ross v Edmund Shinquin
+
*STAC 5/R24/15 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Ross v Edmund Shinquin
 
*STAC 5/R1/21 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinckwin  
 
*STAC 5/R1/21 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinckwin  
 
*see also [[STAC Rosse]]
 
*see also [[STAC Rosse]]
Line 399: Line 491:
 
''' Russe v Franklin '''  
 
''' Russe v Franklin '''  
 
*Interrogatories on behalf of Thomas Russe. Deposition of Robert Frankling of the city of Norwich draper. Interrogatories on behalf of Robert Frankling deft. Deposition of Philip Chapman of London gent, Attorney of Common Pleas. Interrogatories to be put to the Bishop of the Isle of Man. Depostiion of the Bishop of the Isle of Man. STAC 5/R43/10
 
*Interrogatories on behalf of Thomas Russe. Deposition of Robert Frankling of the city of Norwich draper. Interrogatories on behalf of Robert Frankling deft. Deposition of Philip Chapman of London gent, Attorney of Common Pleas. Interrogatories to be put to the Bishop of the Isle of Man. Depostiion of the Bishop of the Isle of Man. STAC 5/R43/10
*STAC 5/R40/7 - B A Rn C I D - 44 Eliz - Thomas Russe v Robert Franklin
+
*STAC 5/R40/7 - B A Rn C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Russe v Robert Franklin
 
*STAC 5/R43/10 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Russe v Robert Francklin
 
*STAC 5/R43/10 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Russe v Robert Francklin
 
*see [[STAC Russe]]
 
*see [[STAC Russe]]
 +
 +
''' S '''
  
 
''' Smith v Woodhouse '''  
 
''' Smith v Woodhouse '''  
 
*Int (only a scrap): Whether in or about the 17 day of the moneth of Februarie in the 38 yeare of her majesties said raigne were you made acquainted or did you know that the pl was then to purchase of Sir Henrie and Sir William Woodhouse knights the late dissolved monastery of Bromholme . . . (Bromholm Priory). Dep: primus die decembr Anno 42 Eliz. Thomas Woodehowse of Ellingham co Norfolk gent aged 34 years. STAC 5/S1/15
 
*Int (only a scrap): Whether in or about the 17 day of the moneth of Februarie in the 38 yeare of her majesties said raigne were you made acquainted or did you know that the pl was then to purchase of Sir Henrie and Sir William Woodhouse knights the late dissolved monastery of Bromholme . . . (Bromholm Priory). Dep: primus die decembr Anno 42 Eliz. Thomas Woodehowse of Ellingham co Norfolk gent aged 34 years. STAC 5/S1/15
*STAC 5/S43/20 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse  
+
*STAC 5/S43/20 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse  
*STAC 5/S30/7 - I D - 40 Eliz - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
+
*STAC 5/S30/7 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
*STAC 5/S37/21 - Rn - 41 Eliz - John Smythe v Sir Henry Woodhouse
+
*STAC 5/S37/21 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smythe v Sir Henry Woodhouse
*STAC 5/S57/22 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse
+
*STAC 5/S57/22 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse
*STAC 5/S14/3 - I D - 42 Eliz - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
+
*STAC 5/S14/3 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
 
*STAC 5/S1/15 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smyth v Sir Henry Woodhouse
 
*STAC 5/S1/15 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smyth v Sir Henry Woodhouse
*STAC 5/S54/21 - I D - 43 Eliz - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse
+
*STAC 5/S54/21 - I D - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse
 
*see also [[STAC Smith, J]]
 
*see also [[STAC Smith, J]]
  
 
''' Sporeley v Makender '''
 
''' Sporeley v Makender '''
 
*TNA Note: Wolverton and Lynn: Forcible dispute as to gathering mussels, and false imprisonment. STAC 7/5/15
 
*TNA Note: Wolverton and Lynn: Forcible dispute as to gathering mussels, and false imprisonment. STAC 7/5/15
*STAC 5/W16/28 - I D - 1 Eliz - Inhabitants of Woolverton v Inhabitants of Lynn
+
*STAC 5/W16/28 - I D - 1 Eliz - Lincolnshire, Norfolk - Inhabitants of Woolverton [?Wolfreton] v Inhabitants of Lynn
*STAC 7/5/15 - - - Lincolnshire - Roger Sporeley, Alexander Tebye, John Geyges et al inhabitants of Wolverton v John Makender, Ralph Downes, Edward Andrye, Thomas Ladyman et al
+
*STAC 7/5/15 - - - Lincolnshire, Norfolk - Roger Sporeley, Alexander Tebye, John Geyges et al inhabitants of Wolverton v John Makender, Ralph Downes, Edward Andrye, Thomas Ladyman et al
 
*see also [[STAC Wolverton]] and see also [[STAC Sporeley]]
 
*see also [[STAC Wolverton]] and see also [[STAC Sporeley]]
 +
 +
''' T '''
  
 
''' Taverner v Thompson '''
 
''' Taverner v Thompson '''
*STAC 7/15/44 - TNA Note: Perjury in the Exchequer on behalf of Lord Cromwell, in a suit for the manors of North Elmham and Beetley. Roger Taverner, deputy surveyor of the Queen's woods
+
*TNA Note: Perjury in the Exchequer on behalf of Lord Cromwell, in a suit for the manors of North Elmham and Beetley. Roger Taverner, deputy surveyor of the Queen's woods. STAC 7/15/44
*STAC 5/T35/30 - B A - 16 Eliz - Roger Taverner v Thomas Lusher, Margaret Thompson et al
+
*STAC 5/T35/30 - B A - 16 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Thomas Lusher, Margaret Thompson et al
 
*STAC 7/15/44 - - - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Margery Tompson et al
 
*STAC 7/15/44 - - - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Margery Tompson et al
 
*see also [[STAC Taverner]]
 
*see also [[STAC Taverner]]
Line 432: Line 528:
 
''' Tymperley v Themilthorpe '''
 
''' Tymperley v Themilthorpe '''
 
*TNA Note: Will of Bartram Themilthorpe of Worstead. STAC 7/7/30  
 
*TNA Note: Will of Bartram Themilthorpe of Worstead. STAC 7/7/30  
*STAC 5/T17/29 - Rn  - 38 Eliz - Henry Tympley v Thomas Thinilthorpe
+
*STAC 5/T17/29 - Rn  - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Tympley v Thomas Thinilthorpe
 
*STAC 7/7/30 - - - Norfolk - Henry Tymperley, v Thomas Themilthorpe, John Potter
 
*STAC 7/7/30 - - - Norfolk - Henry Tymperley, v Thomas Themilthorpe, John Potter
 
*see also [[STAC Timperley]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Timperley]]  
Line 438: Line 534:
 
''' Trindle v Woodhouse '''
 
''' Trindle v Woodhouse '''
 
*TNA Note: Carlton etc: Tenancy in first deft's manor. STAC 7/15/50  
 
*TNA Note: Carlton etc: Tenancy in first deft's manor. STAC 7/15/50  
*STAC 5/T34/31 - B - 22 Eliz - Agnes Trundell, Thomas Trundell v Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
+
*STAC 5/T34/31 - B - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Trundell, Thomas Trundell v Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
*STAC 5/T26/5 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Agnes Tryndle, Thomas Tryndle v Sir Roger Woodhouse
+
*STAC 5/T26/5 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Tryndle, Thomas Tryndle v Sir Roger Woodhouse
*STAC 5/T18/27 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Agnes Tryndell, Thomas Tryndell v Sir Roger Woodehouse, Henry Blake
+
*STAC 5/T18/27 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Tryndell, Thomas Tryndell v Sir Roger Woodehouse, Henry Blake
*STAC 5/T13/40 - I D - 23 Eliz - Thomas Tryndell et uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
+
*STAC 5/T13/40 - I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tryndell et uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
 
*STAC 7/15/50 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Trundell, et Agnes uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
 
*STAC 7/15/50 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Trundell, et Agnes uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
 
*see also [[STAC Trindle]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Trindle]]  
*
+
 
 
''' UV '''  
 
''' UV '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' W '''
 +
 
 
''' Whitney v Gest '''
 
''' Whitney v Gest '''
 
*Thetford, Norfolk. Robert Whitney, Gent. Interrogatories of John Gest of Thetford, Norfolk and William Tompson of Thetford, shoemaker. STAC 5/W56/39
 
*Thetford, Norfolk. Robert Whitney, Gent. Interrogatories of John Gest of Thetford, Norfolk and William Tompson of Thetford, shoemaker. STAC 5/W56/39
*STAC 5/W32/20 - B - - Robert Whitney v John Geste, William Tompson et al
+
*STAC 5/W32/20 - B - - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v John Geste, William Tompson et al
 
*STAC 5/W56/39 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v Lawrence Fytt, William Thompson
 
*STAC 5/W56/39 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v Lawrence Fytt, William Thompson
*STAC 5/W29/1 - A Rn C I D - 29 Eliz - Robert Whitney v William Thompson, Lawrence Fytt et al
+
*STAC 5/W29/1 - A Rn C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v William Thompson, Lawrence Fytt et al
 
*see also [[STAC Whitney]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Whitney]]  
  
 
''' Woodhouse v Kett '''
 
''' Woodhouse v Kett '''
 
*TNA Note: Mileham and Beeston: Maintenance of a drain and bridge on the manor, common of pasture. STAC 7/16/22  
 
*TNA Note: Mileham and Beeston: Maintenance of a drain and bridge on the manor, common of pasture. STAC 7/16/22  
*STAC 5/W22/13 - B A - 17 Eliz - Roger Woodhowse v Valentine Kett
+
*STAC 5/W22/13 - B A - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhowse v Valentine Kett
 
*STAC 7/16/22 - - - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Richard Kett, Hilary Baly et al  
 
*STAC 7/16/22 - - - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Richard Kett, Hilary Baly et al  
 
*STAC 5/W3/16 - B A Rn C I D - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Knyght, Valentine Knyght alias Kett, John Nevell, William Chace, Nicholas Banister et al
 
*STAC 5/W3/16 - B A Rn C I D - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Knyght, Valentine Knyght alias Kett, John Nevell, William Chace, Nicholas Banister et al
*STAC 5/W16/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Valentine Kett
+
*STAC 5/W16/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Valentine Kett
*STAC 5/W18/14 - Rn - 23 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Botie, John Nevell et al
+
*STAC 5/W18/14 - Rn - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Botie, John Nevell et al
*STAC 5/W4/26 - B A Rr - Trin 23 Eliz - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Henry Knevett, Edmund Knevett, Anthony Knevett, John Neville, Richard Watts, William Guilder et al
+
*STAC 5/W4/26 - B A Rr - Trin 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Henry Knevett, Edmund Knevett, Anthony Knevett, John Neville, Richard Watts, William Guilder et al
 
*see also [[STAC Woodhouse]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Woodhouse]]  
*
+
 
 
''' X '''  
 
''' X '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' Y '''
 +
 
 
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Bettys '''
 
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Bettys '''
 
*STAC 5/Y2/4 - B - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Jurats and Burgesses of Yarmouth v Thomas Bettys, John Pidgeon et al
 
*STAC 5/Y2/4 - B - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Jurats and Burgesses of Yarmouth v Thomas Bettys, John Pidgeon et al
Line 471: Line 571:
  
 
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Gunvile '''
 
''' Yarmouth Corporation v Gunvile '''
*STAC 5/B103/16 - B A Rn - 12 Eliz - John Burforth, Ambrose Bullard v Henry Gunoyle et al  
+
*STAC 5/B103/16 - B A Rn - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - John Burforth, Ambrose Bullard v Henry Gunoyle et al  
 
*STAC 5/Y2/11 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvile et al
 
*STAC 5/Y2/11 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvile et al
 
*STAC 5/Y4/2 - Rn - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvyle
 
*STAC 5/Y4/2 - Rn - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvyle
*STAC 5/U3/2 - C I D - 13 Eliz - John Uffar, Ambrose Bullward v Henry Gunvyle, Robert Candler et al
+
*STAC 5/U3/2 - C I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - John Uffar, Ambrose Bullward v Henry Gunvyle, Robert Candler et al
 
*see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
 
*see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
  
Line 480: Line 580:
 
*STAC 5/Y1/14 - B Dr - Hil 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Comomalty of Yarmouth, v William Wylde, John Wylde, Nathaniell Arnold, Matthew Fullgood, Robert Ward et al
 
*STAC 5/Y1/14 - B Dr - Hil 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Comomalty of Yarmouth, v William Wylde, John Wylde, Nathaniell Arnold, Matthew Fullgood, Robert Ward et al
 
*see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
 
*see also [[STAC Yarmouth]]
*
+
 
 
''' Z '''  
 
''' Z '''  
*
+
 
 
''' Almoner '''
 
''' Almoner '''
  
Line 501: Line 601:
  
 
''' Almoner v Lowcock '''
 
''' Almoner v Lowcock '''
*STAC 5/A6/8 - B - 39 Eliz - Derbyshire, Norfolk - Almoner v William Lowecock
 
 
*Edmond Stephenson late of Dronfield co Derby gent felo de se. Drowned himself in Norfolk in a river near Norwich. STAC 5/A6/8  
 
*Edmond Stephenson late of Dronfield co Derby gent felo de se. Drowned himself in Norfolk in a river near Norwich. STAC 5/A6/8  
 +
*STAC 5/A6/8 - B - 39 Eliz - Derbyshire, Norfolk - Almoner v William Lowecock
 
*see also [[STAC Lowcock]]
 
*see also [[STAC Lowcock]]
  
 
''' Almoner v Moore '''
 
''' Almoner v Moore '''
*STAC 7/1/10 - TNA Note: Hingham: Goods of [blank] Forde, suicide
+
*TNA Note: Hingham: Goods of [blank] Forde, suicide. STAC 7/1/10
 
*STAC 7/1/10 - - - Norfolk - Almoner (Edmund, bishop of Rochester) v Thomas Moore  
 
*STAC 7/1/10 - - - Norfolk - Almoner (Edmund, bishop of Rochester) v Thomas Moore  
 
*see also [[STAC Moore]]
 
*see also [[STAC Moore]]
Line 529: Line 629:
  
 
''' AG v Fryer '''
 
''' AG v Fryer '''
*STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
+
*STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
*STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - AG v Anthony Fryer
+
*STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer
 
*STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford  
 
*STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford  
*STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - - AG v Anthony Frise  
+
*STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Frise  
 
*see also [[STAC Fryer]]
 
*see also [[STAC Fryer]]
  
Line 538: Line 638:
 
*Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich). STAC 5/A32/39  
 
*Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich). STAC 5/A32/39  
 
*Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.  
 
*Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.  
*STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Cleare
+
*STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Cleare
 
*STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
 
*STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
 
**Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General
 
**Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General
Line 544: Line 644:
 
**Answer of Thomas Sego
 
**Answer of Thomas Sego
 
**Demurrer of William Gressham
 
**Demurrer of William Gressham
*STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al
+
*STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al
 
*see also [[STAC Clere]]
 
*see also [[STAC Clere]]
  
Line 550: Line 650:
 
*Norwich, Eight Answers. STAC 5/A32/30
 
*Norwich, Eight Answers. STAC 5/A32/30
 
*STAC 5/A32/30 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gibson et uxor, Judeth Wilson, John Thompson, John Beamond, Simon Davye et al  
 
*STAC 5/A32/30 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gibson et uxor, Judeth Wilson, John Thompson, John Beamond, Simon Davye et al  
*STAC 5/A26/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - AG v Margaret Gybson et al
+
*STAC 5/A26/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Margaret Gybson et al
*STAC 5/A19/32 - I -  - AG v Henry Gybson
+
*STAC 5/A19/32 - I -  - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gybson
 
*see also [[STAC Gibson]]
 
*see also [[STAC Gibson]]
  
Line 572: Line 672:
 
''' AG v Jermyn '''
 
''' AG v Jermyn '''
 
*STAC 5/A2/40 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmond Jermyn, Robert Bateman, Rowland Thompson, Thomas Worth et al
 
*STAC 5/A2/40 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmond Jermyn, Robert Bateman, Rowland Thompson, Thomas Worth et al
*STAC 5/A57/31 - B A - - AG v Francis Jermyne, Richard Jones et al
+
*STAC 5/A57/31 - B A - - Norfolk - AG v Francis Jermyne, Richard Jones et al
*STAC 5/A15/8 - I D - 8 Eliz - AG v Francis Jermye et al
+
*STAC 5/A15/8 - I D - 8 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Francis Jermye et al
*STAC 5/A11/16 - A - 40 Eliz - AG v Edmund Jermyn et al
+
*STAC 5/A11/16 - A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmund Jermyn et al
 
*see also [[STAC Jermyn]]
 
*see also [[STAC Jermyn]]
  
Line 580: Line 680:
 
*Wymondham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A55/37  
 
*Wymondham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A55/37  
 
*STAC 5/A55/37 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon et al
 
*STAC 5/A55/37 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon et al
*STAC 5/A17/8 - Rn - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
+
*STAC 5/A17/8 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
*STAC 5/A22/29 - Rr - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
+
*STAC 5/A22/29 - Rr - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
*STAC 5/A28/16 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v John Pigeon, Richard Witherley, John Parker et al
+
*STAC 5/A28/16 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, Richard Witherley, John Parker et al
 
*see also [[STAC Pigeon]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Pigeon]]  
  
 
''' AG v Terrold '''
 
''' AG v Terrold '''
 
*STAC 5/A1/39 - A Rn C I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaits, Thomas Amides, William Terold
 
*STAC 5/A1/39 - A Rn C I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaits, Thomas Amides, William Terold
*STAC 5/A46/5 - C I D - 40 Eliz- AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaytes, Thomas Amyas et al
+
*STAC 5/A46/5 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaytes, Thomas Amyas et al
*STAC 7/17/55 - - - AG v William Terolde et al
+
*STAC 7/17/55 - - - Norfolk - AG v William Terolde et al
 
*see also [[STAC Terrold]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Terrold]]  
  
Line 598: Line 698:
 
''' AG v Wharton '''
 
''' AG v Wharton '''
 
*Ingrossing of grain, many many answers including one by Robert Pooke citizen and aldermen of Norwich. STAC 5/A55/36  
 
*Ingrossing of grain, many many answers including one by Robert Pooke citizen and aldermen of Norwich. STAC 5/A55/36  
*STAC 5/A8/22 - I - 39 Eliz - AG v Martin Wharton, Thomas Norfor et al
+
*STAC 5/A8/22 - I - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martin Wharton, Thomas Norfor et al
 
*STAC 5/A55/36 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martyn Wharton et al  
 
*STAC 5/A55/36 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martyn Wharton et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
 
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
Line 604: Line 704:
 
''' AG v Whitehand '''
 
''' AG v Whitehand '''
 
*TNA Note: Forgery of warrants and bonds. STAC 7/1/5  
 
*TNA Note: Forgery of warrants and bonds. STAC 7/1/5  
*STAC 5/A47/36 - I D - 44 Eliz - AG v Ralfe Whithand
+
*STAC 5/A47/36 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Ralfe Whithand
*STAC 5/A44/14 - I D - 45 Eliz - AG v Raphe Whitehand, John Clybury
+
*STAC 5/A44/14 - I D - 45 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Raphe Whitehand, John Clybury
 
*STAC 7/1/5 - - - Norfolk - AG (Edward Coke) v Ralph Whitehand, Edward Ralf
 
*STAC 7/1/5 - - - Norfolk - AG (Edward Coke) v Ralph Whitehand, Edward Ralf
 
*see also [[STAC Whitehand]]
 
*see also [[STAC Whitehand]]

Revision as of 19:00, 21 October 2016

Norfolk

  • Aldham v Harvey
  • Allen v Playford
  • Allyson v Richman
  • Anguish v Nicholas
  • Armiger v Whitney - Armiger v Barber
  • Artis v Ashill
  • Baldrey v Ward
  • Becker v Neave
  • Beckham v Halman and Crane
  • Blenerhasset v Sayers
  • Cobbe v Hunt - Cobbe v Radcliffe
  • Cooke v Jewell
  • Cooper v Goose
  • Coppin v Palmer
  • Cornwallis v Gesh and Pinner
  • Cromwell v Tavernor
  • Crosse v Futter
  • Curdey v Skeet
  • Curtis v Evance
  • Dereham v Barton
  • Eden v Downing
  • Evans v Newbie
  • Farmor v Grimston - Farmor v Haydon
  • Fawcett v Woolman, Boston and Sharpe
  • Fenn v Flowerdew
  • Fenton v Wright
  • Fiske v Goldsmith and Gaunt
  • Flatman v Ward and Pigeon - Flatman v Carter - Flatman v Flatman
  • Forest v Lacy and Booth
  • Fulhurste v Vowell
  • Fuller v Dalton and Elmer
  • Gurboldsham v Muskett
  • Howard v Mulley
  • Hunt v Whiting
  • Ireland v Wright and Bright
  • Jennor v Fairfax
  • Jervis v Tubbard
  • Johnson v Smyth
  • Jubye v Youngman
  • Killingtree v Pell
  • Knyvett v Burgess and Ryder - Knyvett v Dixon
  • Marsham v Brampton
  • Parfrey v Stokes
  • Ragland v Yelverton
  • Ramsay v Fawcett
  • Reade v Adamson - Reade v Green and Britton
  • Rigdon v Constable
  • Rosse v Shinkwin
  • Russe v Franklin
  • Smith v Woodhouse
  • Sporeley v Makender
  • Taverner v Thompson
  • Thetford Corporation v Bassingwaite
  • Tymperley v Themilthorpe
  • Trindle v Woodhouse
  • Whitney v Gest
  • Woodhouse v Kett
  • Yarmouth Corporation v Bettys - Yarmouth Corporation v Gunvile - Yarmouth Corporation v Wylde
  • Almoner v Blundeville - Almoner v Goldman - Almoner v Hall - Almoner v Lowcock - Almoner v Moore - Almoner v Perryman - Almoner v Pleasants
  • AG v Abrahan - AG v Fryer - AG v Gresham and Clere - AG v Gibson - AG v Harward - AG v Heveningham - AG v Jermyn - AG v Pigeon - AG v Terrold - AG v Thwaites - AG v Wharton - AG v Whitehand

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

A

Aldham v Harvey

  • Wramplingham co Norfolk. STAC 5/A4/17
  • STAC 5/A4/17 - B A - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Aldham v John Harvye, Anthony Bennyt, Thomas Hallyet et al
  • STAC 5/A16 /11 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Aldehn v John Harvy
  • see also STAC Aldham

Allen v Playford

  • Thomas Aleyn of Northrepps co Norfolk. STAC 5/A52/8
  • STAC 5/A52/8 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allen v Henry Playford et al
  • STAC 5/A7/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Aleyn v Henry Playforth et al, John Atkyns, William Perker et al
  • see also STAC Allen

Allyson v Richman

  • Thomas Alyson of Aylesham co Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/2
  • STAC 5/A2/2 - B Dr - Easter 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allyson v Thomas Richman, George Thomson
  • see also STAC Allyson

Anguish v Nicholas

  • Walsingham in the co of Norfolk. STAC 5/A1/30
  • STAC 5/A47/8 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Eme Angwishe v Agnes Nicholas, John Rame et al
  • STAC 5/A53/14 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v Agnes Nicholas, Rame, John Craddock et al
  • STAC 5/A1/30 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v William Nicholas
  • STAC 5/A20 /2 - Rr - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Angus v Anne Nicholas, William Nicholas et al
  • see also STAC Anguish

Armiger v Whitney

  • Possibly Burnham and [King's] Lynne, Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/4
  • STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
  • STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al
  • see also STAC Armiger

Armiger v Barber

  • William Arminger the elder of North Creake in Norfolk gentleman. In re the manor of Hillham in Holkham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A3/26
  • STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al
  • STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v John Barber et al
  • STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
  • STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al
  • see also STAC Armiger

Artis v Ashill

  • John Ashill clerk def parson of Bodney co Norfolk. STAC 5/A6/24
  • STAC 5/A16/18 - B A Rn I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Antys v John Ashyll et al
  • STAC 5/A6/24 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill
  • STAC 5/A43/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
  • STAC 5/A24/4 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artys v John Ashill et al
  • STAC 5/A42/19 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Artis v Robert Purdye, John Ashill
  • see also STAC Artis

B

Baldrey v Ward

  • Theft of crop of peas. Rednall, Norfolk. John Baldrye v Thomas Warde of Rednall, tanner & Margery his wife; Anne Myddaye of Rednall, spinster; John Lawne & Wyllm Palmer of Southreps, yeoman. STAC/B67/4
  • STAC 5/B67/4 - B - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - John Baldrye v Margaret Warde,Thomas Warde, William Palmer
  • see also STAC Baldrey

Becker v Neave

  • Norfolk. Interrogatories to be administered on behalf of Roose Becker complt against Wyllm Neale . . . Thomas Bretton, Thomas Neale, Thomas Becker & Elinor his wife, Thomas Wyth.., John Alyson, Rauffe Symes & Edmund Crell.. defts. Complt is widow of Wyllm Becker of ?Suttyngton?, Norfolk. STAC 5/B67/18
  • STAC 5/B7/12 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Rose Becker v William Neve, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Becker et al
  • STAC 5/B67/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Roose Becker v Thomas Neave, William Neave, Thomas Bretton
  • see also STAC Becker

Beckham v Halman and Crane

  • Fronsham, Norfolk. Refers to writ of ravishment of ward from High Court of Chancery directed to the Shreve of Norfolk against the brothers Richard & Henrye Beckham, and a suit tried at Norwich Assizes by Robert Crane against Richard & Henrye Beckham concerning the wardship of Sara Futter, only daughter & heir of Rycharde Futter. Mention also of the death of Alice Futter, mother of Sara Futter. STAC 5/B68/2
  • STAC 5/B68/2 - B A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v [blank] Halman, Elizabeth Paynter et al
    • Bill of Richard Beckham of Little Frannsham, Norfolk. Defts Edmund Halman, Thomas Halman, John Halman, Robert Crane, Elizabeth Paynter.
    • Answers of Isabell (otherwise Elizabeth) Paynter widow to the bill of complaint of Richard Beckham.
    • Answers of Robarte Crane, Edmunde Halman, John Halman & Thomas Halman
  • STAC 5/B99/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v John Halman, Thomas Halrnan
  • STAC 5/B16/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
  • STAC 5/B103/9 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane, Edmund Halman et al
  • STAC 7/18/23 - - - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
  • see also STAC Beckham

Blenerhasset v Sayers

  • STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
  • STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
  • STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
  • STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
  • STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
  • see also STAC Blenerhasset

C

Cobbe v Hunt

  • In re land in Wolverton Norfolk. STAC 5/C14/12
  • STAC 5/C20/37 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobbe v Edmund Grownde et uxor, John Hunt et uxor et al
  • STAC 5/C14/12 - B A Rn - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobbe v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor et al
  • STAC 5/C7/37 - I Dn - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Cobb v John Hunt et uxor, Edmund Grounde et uxor, John Souckton et uxor, Christopher Goodman et al
  • see also STAC Cobbe

Cobbe v Radcliffe

  • Wolverton, Norfolk. Elizabeth Cobbe, widow. Trespass and destruction of property. Interrogatories administered on behalf of the plaintiff. STAC 10/2/7
  • STAC 5/C46/8 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe, Gyles Skeete et al
  • STAC 10/2/7 - I - - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe
  • see also STAC Cobbe

Cooke v Jewell

  • William Coke of Walcoote [Walcott] in Norfolk yeoman, two and a half acres of land in Estruston [East Ruston] Norfolk. STAC 5/C3/25
  • STAC 5/C3/25 - B C A - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coke v Edmund Jewell et uxor, Thomas Jewell
  • see also STAC Cooke

Cooper v Goose

  • Isaac Cooper of Yarmouth in Norfolk merchant. Inheritance dispute. STAC 5/C3/12
  • STAC 5/C3/12 - B A - Mich 44/45 Eliz - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose, George Goose
  • STAC 5/C10/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - John Cowper v William Goose, George Goose
  • STAC 10/2/4 - Rn - - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose and George Goose
  • see also STAC Cooper

Coppin v Palmer

  • William Coppinge of Beddingham in Norfolk. STAC 5/C2/6
  • STAC 5/C2/6 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Felthrop, Robert Barker, Robert Gooche, Thomas Grimsbye et al
  • STAC 5/C64/16 - A Rn C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppin v Robert Palmer, William Jackson, Robert Barker et al
  • STAC 5/C29/38 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge et al v Robert Palmer, John Cunger, Thomas Grimsbye et al
  • STAC 5/C71/12 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Nelthorpe et al
  • see also STAC Coppin

Cornwallis v Gesh and Pinner

  • Charles Cornwaleys of Carowe in the County of the City of Norwich esquire. In re the manor of Kilverston in Norfolk. STAC 5/C1/24
  • TNA Note: Kilverston: Forcible dispute as to cutting furze, etc. STAC 7/11/11
  • STAC 5/C1/24 - B A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleys v Simon Gesh, John Pinner, John Smith, William Browett
  • STAC 7/11/11 - - - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleis v Simon Gest, John Pynner
  • STAC 5/C72/1 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Conwallis v William Le Gris, Robert Cottrell
  • see also STAC Cornwallis

Cromwell v Tavernor

  • North Elmham, Norfolk. Referenced in "Custom Improvement and Anti-Improvement in Early Modern Britain" edited by Richard W. Hoyle, which also refers to related Chancery cases. STAC 5/C73/17; C35/9; C42/9; C58/5; C78/14
  • STAC 5/C17/9 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Crumwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
  • STAC 5/C73/17 - I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Camwell [Cromwell] v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C30/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor
  • STAC 5/C58/5 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C78/14 - I - - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C73/3 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C45/36 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Crumwell v James Taverner et al
  • STAC 5/C32/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v John Browne
  • STAC 5/C38/21 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
  • STAC 5/C28/3 - I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v Edward Daulton, Val(entine) Hartoppe, Martyn Arden et al
  • STAC 5/C42/9 - B A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v Thomas Steward, John Taverner et al
  • STAC 5/C53/16 - I D - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v Thomas Steward
  • STAC 5/C74/14 - I D - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v Roger Townshend
  • see also STAC Cromwell see also STAC Taverner

Crosse v Futter

  • Depositions of Nicholas ?Parker? and others. Messuage in Bryssingham, Norfolk.(dk) STAC 5/C78/13
  • STAC 5/C78/13 - D - 1 Eliz - Norfolk - [blank] Crosse v [blank] Futter et al
  • see also STAC Cross

Curdey v Skeet

  • William Curdy of Aldeburgh in Norfolk. STAC 5/C1/37
  • STAC 5/C1/37 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdy v John Skeete Sr, John Skette Jr, John Orrys, Richard Smyth
  • STAC 5/C48/21 - I - Norfolk - William Curdye v John Orrys, John Skete Sr, John Skete Jr
  • STAC 5/C19/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdys v Richard Smith
  • see also STAC Curdey

Curtis v Evance

  • Thomas Curteis of Lynn Regis Norfolk. STAC 5/C3/5
  • STAC 5/C3/5 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Curteis v Edmond Evance, Thomas Burton. Transcribed STAC 5/C3/5
  • see also STAC Curtis

D

Dereham v Barton

  • TNA Note: West Dereham: Affray. STAC 7/11/27
  • STAC 5/D21/8 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, Robert Edge, John Atkins
  • STAC 5/D36/17 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, John Atkins
  • STAC 5/D34/26 - C I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dearham v Peter Barton
  • STAC 7/11/27 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Deareham v Peter Barton, John Atkyns
  • STAC 7/20/25 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Derham v Peter Barton et al
  • see also STAC Dereham

E

Eden v Downing

  • Thomas Edon of Martham co Norfolk yeoman. Whereas the Dean and Chapter of Norwich owned the rectory of Martham and the parsonage house. 21 year lease to complainant. Answer of William Downinge gent. Now so it is may it please your most excellent Majesty that Wm Downing gent, Edward Browne, Simonde Sippens, Richard Tompson, and Robert Buclingham and divers other persons to your said subject unknown, hot [having] the fear of god before their eis nor any dutiful regard to your Majesties good and godlie laws upon the 9th day of may now last passed did in warlike disorderlie and unlawfull manner assemble and bande themsellves together at Martham. And upon the said day with force and arms that is to say with swords halberts morris pykes piked staves and divers other weapons as well invasive as defensive into the said messuage called the parsonage house forcible riotously and unlawfully did break and enter. And one Anthony Edon and one Richarde Wattes then [being in] the said messuage by the appointment and commandment of your said subject did beat wound and evell intreat. STAC 5/E1/14
  • STAC 5/E15/33 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden v William Downing Edward Browne et al
  • STAC 5/E11/38 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v William Doewning, Henry Wilcocks, Robert Hall et al
  • STAC 5/E13/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Edon v William Downinge, Edward Browne
  • STAC 5/E14/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Henry Willcock, William Downing, Robert Layton
  • STAC 5/E1/14 - B A Rn Rr - 31 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden v William Downing, Edward Brown, Simon Sippens, Richard Thompson et al
  • STAC 5/E2/5 - A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Eden, William Franklyn v Robert Burlingham
  • see also STAC Eden

Evans v Newbie

  • Thomas Evans of the parish of Saxtropte [Saxthorpe?] co Norfolk. Two water mills for the grinding of Corn and one other mill for fullinge of Clothe scituate and being within the parish of Horsteed [Horstead] co Norfolk. Forcible entry and ejection. STAC 5/E1/12
  • STAC 5/E1/12 - B - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Evans v Edmund Newbie, Robert Usher, Nicholas Kent, Robert Blenkinsop alias Sextus, John Mower, Clement Warnes, William Tompson [ ] Davison
  • STAC 5/E9/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Evans v Edmond Newby et al
  • see also STAC Evans

F

Farmor v Haydon

  • Thomas Farmor of East Bashnn’in co Norfolk esquire. STAC 5/F3/27
  • STAC 5/F30/39 - B - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermer v Sir William Heydon
  • STAC 5/F3/27 - B A C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Farmor v Sir William Haydon.
  • see also STAC Farmer

Farmor v Grimston

  • STAC 5/F3/19 - B A - Hli 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grympston. Transcription STAC 5/F3/19
  • STAC 5/F21/22 - B - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Farmer v Christopher Grimeston
  • STAC 5/F20/28 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grimston
  • STAC 5/F17/22 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermor v Christopher Grynston
  • see also STAC Farmer

Fawcett v Woolman, Boston and Sharpe

  • James Fawcett of Kings Lynne in the co of Norfolk whereas Robert Page and Elizabeth his wife executrix of Wm Judye deceased . . was possessed of one cupboard and divers other goods . . STAC 5/F22/14
  • STAC 5/F22/14 - B A Rn C - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcett v William Wolman, John Sharpe et al.
  • STAC 5/F4/2 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcet v William Wolman, John Sharp, Thomas Boston, Thomas Miller et al
  • STAC 5/F31/28 - Rr - - Norfolk - James Fawcet v Thomas Boston, William Woolman et al
  • see also STAC Fawcett

Fenn v Flowerdew

  • TNA Note: Burston and Thirning: Estate of Thomas Appleton. STAC 7/12/7
  • STAC 5/F26/21 - B - - Norfolk - William Fenn v Thomas Allenn, Stephen Flowerdue et al
  • STAC 5/F8/12 - Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdine et uxor, John Vinyor Sr et al
  • STAC 5/F6/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenn v Stephen Flowerden et uxor, Thomas Allen et al
  • STAC 5/F13/17 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdew et al
  • STAC 7/12/7 - - - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdewe, et Agnes uxor, John Vinyour et al
  • see also STAC Fenn

Fenton v Wright

  • That whereas one Robert Clarke of Walpole in the co of Norfolk deceased . . . STAC 5/F2/5
  • STAC 5/F10/23 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, William Edes et al
  • STAC 5/F2/5 - B A C - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, Henry Huntson, William Brown, William Eades et al.
  • STAC 5/F16/15 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright, William Welbie et al
  • see also STAC Fenton

Fiske v Goldsmith and Gaunt

  • Ambrose Fyske of Welles in co Norfolk, merchaunte was impleaded by one Edwarde Waytes before the Mayor and recorder of Lynne in the town court there . . . an action upon the case . . Waytes and John Chartres of Lynne merchaunt bought of Fyske one ship called the George for 240li.) STAC 5/F22/19
  • TNA Notes: Lynn: Perjury in a suit concerning a ship. STAC 7/2/29
  • STAC 5/F22/19 - B A - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fiske v Henry Goldsmith, Christopher Gaunte et al
  • STAC 5/F12/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Christopher Grante, Nicholas Derbye et al
  • STAC 7/2/29 - - - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Edward Waytes, Christopher Gaunt
  • see also STAC Fiske

Flatman v Ward and Pigeon

  • TNA Note: Norwich: Verdict of deft's, as a jury. STAC 7/12/9
  • STAC 5/F19/4 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v William Ward, John Pigeon, Robert Prentice
  • STAC 5/F25/23 - B A C - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Flattman v William Ward, Robert Prentice et al
  • STAC 5/F24/7 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Bigeon, Robert Tyte
  • STAC 7/12/9 - - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Pigeon, John Tyte et al
  • STAC 5/F18/22 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v Thomas Downing et al
  • STAC 5/F12/32 - A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Flatman et al v Thomas Downing
  • see also STAC Flatman

Flatman v Carter

  • Thomas Flatman of Sterston, Norfolk. STAC 5/F2/20, STAC 5/F2/1
  • STAC 5/F2/20 - B - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Carter, John Rose, Richard Shreve, Henry Horne
  • see also STAC Flatman

Flatman v Flatman

  • Thomas Flatman of Sterston, Norfolk. STAC 5/F2/20, STAC 5/F2/1
  • STAC 5/F2/1 - B Dr - Trin 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Flatman, Robert Prince, Richard Flatman, et al
  • see also STAC Flatman

Forest v Lacy and Booth

  • John Forrest gent. of Holkham Norfolk and Alice his wife, late the widow and administratrix of Edmund Windham esquire. STAC 5/F3/14
  • STAC 5/F3/14 - B A - Trin 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest et uxor v John Lacey, William Booeth, George Booeth et uxor, John Burbitch et al.
  • STAC 5/F19/19 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest v George Boothe, John Burbyche, Henry Call
  • see also STAC Forest

Fulhurste v Vowell

  • George Fulhurste of London gent. Thomas Vowell in [blank] co Norfolk. STAC 5/F3/30
  • STAC 5/F3/30 - B - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - George Fulshurste v Thomas Vowell, Robert Vowell, Richard Fiejohn alias Feejohn, Robert Franklin et al
  • see also STAC Fullhurst

Fuller v Dalton and Elmer

  • Thomas Fuller of Norhold in co Norfolk. Henry Sparrowe and Robart Dalton of the said town yeomen. STAC 5/F3/5
  • STAC 5/F7/33 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Richard Elemour, Thomas Neale et al
  • STAC 5/F1/11 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller, Henry Sparrow, Robert Dalton v Richard Elmor, Thomas Neale, Robert Sparrow, Robert Raymond Sr, Robert Raymond Jr
  • STAC 5/F3/5 - B Dr - Hil 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Dalton, Richard Elmer
  • STAC 5/F7/14 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Rayner Sr et al
  • see also STAC Fuller

G

Gurboldsham v Muskett

  • All Saints Garboldisham, Norfolk. STAC 5/G14/1
  • STAC 5/G14/1 - B - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - The Parishioners of Gurboldsham all Saints, v William Muskett, Simon Muskett.
  • see also STAC Garboldisham

H

Howard v Mulley

  • TNA Notes: Kenninghall: Resistance to a distress. STAC 7/3/7
  • STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon
  • see also STAC Howard

Hunt v Whiting

  • TNA Note: Gimingham: Forcible entry on lands held of the manor. STAC 7/12/37
  • STAC 5/H60/31 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting, John Browne et al
  • STAC 5/H18/23 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunt v Walter Whiting
  • STAC 5/H28/13 - I D - 10 Eliz - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Wytty et al
  • STAC 7/12/37 - - - Norfolk - Nicholas Hunte v Thomas Windam, Thomas Wyttye, Walter Whiting, Robert Howse et al
  • see also STAC Hunt

I J

Ireland v Wright and Bright

  • The Complainant was in the Fleet prison at the suit of Thomas Tooley on a forged bond. Deposition of Thomas Bleverhassell of the City of Norwich. STAC 5/J3/20
  • STAC 5/J7/28 - B A - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
  • STAC 5/J3/20 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, John Puxley et al
  • STAC 5/J15/39 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Peter Bright, Thomas Wright, Thomas Buxley
  • STAC 5/J20/32 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v Thomas Wright, Peter Bright et al
  • STAC 5/J22/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - William Ireland v John Puxley, Thomas Wright et al
  • see also STAC Ireland

Jennor v Fairfax

  • Francis Jennor is an infant. Margaret Jennor his mother acts for him. STAC 5/J4/13
  • STAC 5/J7/30 - B A Rn - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v Thomas Jennor, John Jennor, William Fayrefax
  • STAC 5/J4/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor v William Fairfax et al
  • STAC 5/J14/30 - I D - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Francis Jennor, Margery Jennor v William Raynface
  • see also STAC Jenner

Jervis v Tubbard

  • Messuage in Felbrigge Norfolk. STAC 5/J3/16
  • STAC 5/J3/16 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervys, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henbury
  • STAC 5/J7/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jervis, Edward Tubberd v Christopher Henburye
  • STAC 5/J13/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jearvens v Christopher Henbery, Edward Tubberd
  • see also STAC Jervais

Johnson v Smyth

  • Thomas Johnson of Old Buckenham and Dorothie his wife. STAC 5/J3/28
  • STAC 5/J3/28 - B - 34 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Johnson v Thomas Smyth, Jacob Preston et Mary uxor, Robert Jolly, Thomas Haplye, John Pryor, Henry Bacon, William Preston, Thomas Mendham, Abraham Preston, Isaac Preston, Richard Lytleproude, Adam Page.
  • see also STAC Johnson

Jubye v Youngman

  • Deposition of Thomas Youngman of Carleton Norfolk and others. STAC 5/J4/5
  • STAC 5/J1/3 - B A - Mich 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jubye v Thomas Youngeman, William Jubye, John Sherwyn, William Yongeman
  • STAC 5/J4/5 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Jewbye v William Yongeman, William Jewbye
  • STAC 5/J15/33 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Jewbie v Thomas Youngman, William Youngman, William Jewbie
  • see also STAC Jubey

K

Killingtree v Pell

  • Wm Killingtree mayor of your highness town of Kings Lynne in the county of Norfolk. STAC 5/K1/3
  • STAC 5/K1/3 - B A Rn - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Killingtree, Robert Jervis, John Grigby, George Baker, Francis Shaxton, Thomas Overend v John Pell, Geofery Pell, Valentine Pell, Thomas Blesbie, Henry Violet, William Woolman, Richard Walters, Thomas Maye, Christopher Fisher, Robert Hulliard, Thomas Fowell, Thomas Haughton
  • STAC 5/K8/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - The Mayor of Kings Lynn v John Pell Jeffrey Pell, Christopher Fisher et al
  • see also STAC Killingtree

Knyvett v Dixon

  • Depositions taken in Norwich. STAC 5/K4/34
  • STAC 5/K8/32 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
  • STAC 5/K5/30 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knivett v Ralph Dixon, John Kinsey et al
  • STAC 5/K4/34 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Knyvett v Richard Ringwood, Ralph Dixon et al
  • see also STAC Knivett

Knyvett v Burgess and Ryder

  • Sir Thomas Knivett of Asshwelthorpe Hall Norfolk. STAC 5/K2/8
  • STAC 5/K2/8 - B A I D - Easter 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knivett v John Botye, John Burge Jr, William Rider, Robert Keene, George Browne
  • STAC 5/K3/5 - I D - 32 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v Thomas Burgess, John Burgess et al
  • STAC 5/K7/12 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burghe, William Rider et al
  • STAC 5/K14/32 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knyvett v John Burgess, William Ryder et al
  • STAC 5/K6/34 - I D - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Knevett v John Booties Sr, William Ryder
  • see also STAC Knivett

L

M

Marsham v Brampton

  • STAC 5/M13/13 - B A - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - The inhabitants of the town of Marsham v James Brampton, William Gedney et al
  • see also STAC Marsham

N

O

P

Parfrey v Stokes

  • TNA Note: Wimbotsham: Tithe corn. STAC 7/14/18
  • STAC 5/P46/39 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes et al
  • STAC 5/P53/17 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes
  • STAC 5/P13/26 - B A - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfraye v Thomas Stokes et al
  • STAC 5/P37/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes, Christopher Stokes
  • STAC 7/14/18 - - - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes et al
  • see also STAC Purefey

Q

R

Ragland v Yelverton

  • Bill of Sir Thomas Ragland of Wallington co Norfolk. Dame Anne his wife deceased was sometime wife of Christopher Conysby Esquire deceased.

Ragland owed Wallingford Hall for 16 years since his wife’s death and before that in her right. He was away on business in Glamorgan. William Yelvirston Esq of Rowgham [Rougham] co Norfolk, Thomas Gybbon esq of Lynne co Norfolk, Edward Waters gent of Lynne co Norfolk, Edmond Waters of Lynne co Norfolk, Thomas Might of Flycham [Flitcham] Norfolk Henry Valenger of Lynne gents and John Dalderby of Rowgham yeoman. 20 armed persons. STAC 5/R43/2

  • STAC 5/R43/2 - B - - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton, Thomas Gybbon et al
  • STAC 5/R32/24 - B A Rn Rr - 6 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton, Edward Waters et al
  • STAC 5/R41/27 - I D - 7 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Thomas Ragland v William Yelverton et al
  • see also STAC Ragland

Ramsay v Fawcett

  • John Ramsey of the City of Norwich merchant. STAC 5/R1/27
  • STAC 5/R1/27 - B - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsay v William Faucet
  • STAC 5/R4/7 - A Rn Rr - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsay v William Fawcett
  • STAC 5/R5/20 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Ramsey v William Fawcett
  • see also STAC Ramsay

Reade v Adamson

  • Depositions of John Adamson clerk vicar of Gooderstone co Norfolk and Robert Oliver of Hilb. . . co Norfolk, shepherd. In re a debt due to be paid at the parsonage in Gooderstone. STAC 5/R28/21
  • STAC 5/R28/21 - B A Rn - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - William Read, William Bowton v John Adamson, Robert Olyver
  • STAC 5/R43/14 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - William Rede, William Bowton v John Adamson, Robert Oliver (includes STAC 5/B14/3)
  • see also STAC Read

Reade v Green and Britton

  • TNA Note: Forgery of a writ removing a suit to Westminster from the manorial court of Gimingham. STAC 7/5/4
  • STAC 5/R35/17 - I D - 11 Eliz - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Humfry Britton
  • STAC 7/5/4 - - - Norfolk - Peter Reade v Thomas Grene, Humphrey Bretten
  • see also STAC Read

Rigdon v Constable

  • Bill of Wm Rigdon esq and Dame Ellinor Buck his wife, late wife of Sir John Buck knight deceased. Exhibited her bill in Star Chamber by the name of Lady Eleanor Buck widow. Deceit in the purchase of wool. STAC 5/R1/32
  • STAC 5/R1/32 - B - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - William Rigdon, Dame Eleonor Buck v Robert Constable, William Taylor et al
  • see also STAC Rigdon

Rosse v Shinkwin

  • Interrogatories by Rosse to Shinckwyn. Depositions of Firnun Shinkwyn of Etedeareham, Norfolk, husbandman. In re land at Waton Co. Norfolk. John Neave of Graies Inn house and grounds in Weston, Norfolk Thomas Green of the parish of St Buttalls within the liberties of Smithfield saylemaker. Nicholas Hellwys of Weston, Norfolk. John Jackson of the parish of St Buttolls without Allgate, London. John Croke servant to Thomas Wood of the parish of St Buttalls without Allgate Scrivener. STAC 5/R1/21
  • STAC 5/R30/6 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmond Shinkvyne
  • STAC 5/R18/13 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkwyne
  • STAC 5/R9/24 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinkquyne
  • STAC 5/R24/15 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Ross v Edmund Shinquin
  • STAC 5/R1/21 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Rosse v Edmund Shinckwin
  • see also STAC Rosse

Russe v Franklin

  • Interrogatories on behalf of Thomas Russe. Deposition of Robert Frankling of the city of Norwich draper. Interrogatories on behalf of Robert Frankling deft. Deposition of Philip Chapman of London gent, Attorney of Common Pleas. Interrogatories to be put to the Bishop of the Isle of Man. Depostiion of the Bishop of the Isle of Man. STAC 5/R43/10
  • STAC 5/R40/7 - B A Rn C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Russe v Robert Franklin
  • STAC 5/R43/10 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Russe v Robert Francklin
  • see STAC Russe

S

Smith v Woodhouse

  • Int (only a scrap): Whether in or about the 17 day of the moneth of Februarie in the 38 yeare of her majesties said raigne were you made acquainted or did you know that the pl was then to purchase of Sir Henrie and Sir William Woodhouse knights the late dissolved monastery of Bromholme . . . (Bromholm Priory). Dep: primus die decembr Anno 42 Eliz. Thomas Woodehowse of Ellingham co Norfolk gent aged 34 years. STAC 5/S1/15
  • STAC 5/S43/20 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/S30/7 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/S37/21 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smythe v Sir Henry Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/S57/22 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse
  • STAC 5/S14/3 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/S1/15 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smyth v Sir Henry Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/S54/21 - I D - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - John Smith v Sir Henry Woodehouse
  • see also STAC Smith, J

Sporeley v Makender

  • TNA Note: Wolverton and Lynn: Forcible dispute as to gathering mussels, and false imprisonment. STAC 7/5/15
  • STAC 5/W16/28 - I D - 1 Eliz - Lincolnshire, Norfolk - Inhabitants of Woolverton [?Wolfreton] v Inhabitants of Lynn
  • STAC 7/5/15 - - - Lincolnshire, Norfolk - Roger Sporeley, Alexander Tebye, John Geyges et al inhabitants of Wolverton v John Makender, Ralph Downes, Edward Andrye, Thomas Ladyman et al
  • see also STAC Wolverton and see also STAC Sporeley

T

Taverner v Thompson

  • TNA Note: Perjury in the Exchequer on behalf of Lord Cromwell, in a suit for the manors of North Elmham and Beetley. Roger Taverner, deputy surveyor of the Queen's woods. STAC 7/15/44
  • STAC 5/T35/30 - B A - 16 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Thomas Lusher, Margaret Thompson et al
  • STAC 7/15/44 - - - Norfolk - Roger Taverner v Margery Tompson et al
  • see also STAC Taverner

Thetford Corporation v Bassingwaite

  • STAC 5/T37/37 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Mayor and Burgesses of Thetford v John Bassingwayte, Antony Freere et al
  • see also STAC Thetford

Tymperley v Themilthorpe

  • TNA Note: Will of Bartram Themilthorpe of Worstead. STAC 7/7/30
  • STAC 5/T17/29 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Tympley v Thomas Thinilthorpe
  • STAC 7/7/30 - - - Norfolk - Henry Tymperley, v Thomas Themilthorpe, John Potter
  • see also STAC Timperley

Trindle v Woodhouse

  • TNA Note: Carlton etc: Tenancy in first deft's manor. STAC 7/15/50
  • STAC 5/T34/31 - B - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Trundell, Thomas Trundell v Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
  • STAC 5/T26/5 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Tryndle, Thomas Tryndle v Sir Roger Woodhouse
  • STAC 5/T18/27 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Agnes Tryndell, Thomas Tryndell v Sir Roger Woodehouse, Henry Blake
  • STAC 5/T13/40 - I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Tryndell et uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
  • STAC 7/15/50 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Trundell, et Agnes uxor v Sir Roger Woodhouse, Henry Blake
  • see also STAC Trindle

UV

W

Whitney v Gest

  • Thetford, Norfolk. Robert Whitney, Gent. Interrogatories of John Gest of Thetford, Norfolk and William Tompson of Thetford, shoemaker. STAC 5/W56/39
  • STAC 5/W32/20 - B - - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v John Geste, William Tompson et al
  • STAC 5/W56/39 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v Lawrence Fytt, William Thompson
  • STAC 5/W29/1 - A Rn C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Robert Whitney v William Thompson, Lawrence Fytt et al
  • see also STAC Whitney

Woodhouse v Kett

  • TNA Note: Mileham and Beeston: Maintenance of a drain and bridge on the manor, common of pasture. STAC 7/16/22
  • STAC 5/W22/13 - B A - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhowse v Valentine Kett
  • STAC 7/16/22 - - - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Richard Kett, Hilary Baly et al
  • STAC 5/W3/16 - B A Rn C I D - 17 Eliz - Norfolk - Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Knyght, Valentine Knyght alias Kett, John Nevell, William Chace, Nicholas Banister et al
  • STAC 5/W16/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Valentine Kett
  • STAC 5/W18/14 - Rn - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Thomas Botie, John Nevell et al
  • STAC 5/W4/26 - B A Rr - Trin 23 Eliz - Norfolk - Sir Roger Woodhouse v Henry Knevett, Edmund Knevett, Anthony Knevett, John Neville, Richard Watts, William Guilder et al
  • see also STAC Woodhouse

X

Y

Yarmouth Corporation v Bettys

  • STAC 5/Y2/4 - B - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Jurats and Burgesses of Yarmouth v Thomas Bettys, John Pidgeon et al
  • see also STAC Yarmouth

Yarmouth Corporation v Gunvile

  • STAC 5/B103/16 - B A Rn - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - John Burforth, Ambrose Bullard v Henry Gunoyle et al
  • STAC 5/Y2/11 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvile et al
  • STAC 5/Y4/2 - Rn - - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Commonalty of Yarmouth v Henry Gunvyle
  • STAC 5/U3/2 - C I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - John Uffar, Ambrose Bullward v Henry Gunvyle, Robert Candler et al
  • see also STAC Yarmouth

Yarmouth Corporation v Wylde

  • STAC 5/Y1/14 - B Dr - Hil 43 Eliz - Norfolk - Bailiffs Burgesses and Comomalty of Yarmouth, v William Wylde, John Wylde, Nathaniell Arnold, Matthew Fullgood, Robert Ward et al
  • see also STAC Yarmouth

Z

Almoner

Almoner v Blundeville

  • Andrew Green late of Catfeild Norfolk. Hanged himself. felo de se. STAC 5/A2/32
  • STAC 5/A2/32 - B A - Hil 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v John Blundeville et uxor
  • see also STAC Blundeville

‘’' Almoner v Goldman

  • One Steven Meade late of Rewton or Beston neare unto the sea side in Norfolk. felo de se. STAC 5/A3/36
  • STAC 5/A3/36 - B A - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v Robert Goldman
  • see also STAC Goldman

Almoner v Hall

  • Henry Shrympling and Adame Elger late of Tyrinton St Jones [Terrington St Johns] in Norfolk. both felo de se. STAC 5/A3/34
  • STAC 5/A3/34 - B - - Norfolk - Almoner v William Hall, Francis Leggate
  • see also STAC Hall

Almoner v Lowcock

  • Edmond Stephenson late of Dronfield co Derby gent felo de se. Drowned himself in Norfolk in a river near Norwich. STAC 5/A6/8
  • STAC 5/A6/8 - B - 39 Eliz - Derbyshire, Norfolk - Almoner v William Lowecock
  • see also STAC Lowcock

Almoner v Moore

  • TNA Note: Hingham: Goods of [blank] Forde, suicide. STAC 7/1/10
  • STAC 7/1/10 - - - Norfolk - Almoner (Edmund, bishop of Rochester) v Thomas Moore
  • see also STAC Moore

Almoner v Perryman

  • Walter Vyncent late of Esson [? Easton] in Norfolk felo de se. STAC 5/A5/18
  • STAC 5/A5/18 - B A - - Norfolk - Almoner v Hugh Perryman
  • see also STAC Perryman

Almoner v Pleasants

  • Bond by Richard Banges of Norwich to John Mingey of Norwich apothecary. STAC 5/A39/8
  • Richard Banges of the City of Norwich tanner drowned himself, felo de se. STAC 5/A4/33
  • STAC 5/A4/33 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Pleasants, William Harebrowne, John Mingey, John Howes
  • STAC 5/A39/8 - I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v George Plesaunce
  • see also STAC Pleasants

Attorney General

AG v Abrahan

  • STAC 5/A39/24 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Robert Abrahan
  • see also STAC Abrahan

AG v Fryer

  • STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
  • STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer
  • STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford
  • STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Frise
  • see also STAC Fryer

AG v Gresham and Clere

  • Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich). STAC 5/A32/39
  • Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.
  • STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Cleare
  • STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
    • Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General
    • Answer of Edward Clere.
    • Answer of Thomas Sego
    • Demurrer of William Gressham
  • STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al
  • see also STAC Clere

AG v Gibson

  • Norwich, Eight Answers. STAC 5/A32/30
  • STAC 5/A32/30 - A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gibson et uxor, Judeth Wilson, John Thompson, John Beamond, Simon Davye et al
  • STAC 5/A26/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Margaret Gybson et al
  • STAC 5/A19/32 - I - - Norfolk - AG v Henry Gybson
  • see also STAC Gibson

AG v Harward

AG v Heveningham

  • Interrogatories to be ministered to Sir Arthur Heveningham knight on the part and behalf of HM. Imp did not the Lords of HM most hon PC about the one and thirty yeare of HM raygne direct ther letters to you Sir Arthur Heveningham, Sir Edward Cleer, Sir Robert Southwell knights, Thomas Farmore, William Rugge and Charles Cornwales esquires to examine and ende a cause betwene Thomas Thwayte of Hardingham in Norfolk esq & Richard Thwaites one of the younger sons of the said Thomas of the one parte and Antony Thwayte eldest son of the said Thomas & Francis the wife of the said Anthony on the other parte according to equitie etc. STAC 5/A6/25
  • STAC 5/A6/25 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Sir Arthur Hevenham
  • see also STAC Heveningham

AG v Jermyn

  • STAC 5/A2/40 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmond Jermyn, Robert Bateman, Rowland Thompson, Thomas Worth et al
  • STAC 5/A57/31 - B A - - Norfolk - AG v Francis Jermyne, Richard Jones et al
  • STAC 5/A15/8 - I D - 8 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Francis Jermye et al
  • STAC 5/A11/16 - A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmund Jermyn et al
  • see also STAC Jermyn

AG v Pigeon

  • Wymondham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A55/37
  • STAC 5/A55/37 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon et al
  • STAC 5/A17/8 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
  • STAC 5/A22/29 - Rr - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, John Parker et al
  • STAC 5/A28/16 - I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v John Pigeon, Richard Witherley, John Parker et al
  • see also STAC Pigeon

AG v Terrold

  • STAC 5/A1/39 - A Rn C I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaits, Thomas Amides, William Terold
  • STAC 5/A46/5 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Terrold, Richard Thwaytes, Thomas Amyas et al
  • STAC 7/17/55 - - - Norfolk - AG v William Terolde et al
  • see also STAC Terrold

AG v Thwaites

  • STAC 5/A6/27 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Bridget Thwaits, Thomas Cooper, Robert Cooper
  • Examinations taken at Hardingham co Norfolk 25 Sept 40 Eliz before Danyell Rieve DD, Martyn Sidley esq, Thomas Thetford esq [in the case] between William Terrold, Richard Thwaite et al Defs and Edward Cooke AG compl. Interrogatories to be ministered to Bridgett Thwaites widdowe Thomas Cooper yeoman, Robert Cooper yeoman on the part of William Terrold, Richard Thwaites and Thomas Amyas, three of the defs to the information of Edward Cooke AG. Depostion of Thomas Cowper of Depeham co Norfolk aged 60: that he hath heard that there were letters directed to certain knights and esquires in the said county from the lords of HM PC authorizing thaen therby to here and determine all matters of controversy that were then betwene Thomas Thwaites of Hardingham and Anthony his eldest sonne. STAC 5/A6/27
  • see also STAC Thwaits

AG v Wharton

  • Ingrossing of grain, many many answers including one by Robert Pooke citizen and aldermen of Norwich. STAC 5/A55/36
  • STAC 5/A8/22 - I - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martin Wharton, Thomas Norfor et al
  • STAC 5/A55/36 - B A - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Martyn Wharton et al
  • see also STAC Wharton

AG v Whitehand

  • TNA Note: Forgery of warrants and bonds. STAC 7/1/5
  • STAC 5/A47/36 - I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Ralfe Whithand
  • STAC 5/A44/14 - I D - 45 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Raphe Whitehand, John Clybury
  • STAC 7/1/5 - - - Norfolk - AG (Edward Coke) v Ralph Whitehand, Edward Ralf
  • see also STAC Whitehand