Difference between revisions of "STAC co Lancaster"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 74: Line 74:
 
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 24r. Practice and misdemeanor in causing witnesses to confess themselves perjured and to accuse the plaintiff of procurement of perjury. Brereton, plaintiff; Sherrington et al: for practicing to accuse the plaintiff of procurement of perjury and for practicing to cause the plaintiff’s witnesses in a formal cause to retract their testimonies and so draw them by practice to confess in their answers in this court that they were perjured in deposing for the plaintiff before, for which the defendants were fined at £200, Fleet, sequestered from practice, and to ask the plaintiff’s forgiveness. Easter 31 Elizabeth (kk)
 
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 24r. Practice and misdemeanor in causing witnesses to confess themselves perjured and to accuse the plaintiff of procurement of perjury. Brereton, plaintiff; Sherrington et al: for practicing to accuse the plaintiff of procurement of perjury and for practicing to cause the plaintiff’s witnesses in a formal cause to retract their testimonies and so draw them by practice to confess in their answers in this court that they were perjured in deposing for the plaintiff before, for which the defendants were fined at £200, Fleet, sequestered from practice, and to ask the plaintiff’s forgiveness. Easter 31 Elizabeth (kk)
 
**see also [[STAC Brereton]]  
 
**see also [[STAC Brereton]]  
 +
 +
''' Brereton v Sherrington '''
 +
*STAC 5/B1/39 - B A C I D - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Sherrington, Richard Brooke, John Gawen, Giles Lomas, Alice Lomas et al
 +
**The Bill is difficult, a lot of interrogatories, depositions taken at Manchester 1st April Anno 30 Eliz. Deponents from Worsley co Lancaster: William Eoge weaver, Thomas Partington husbandman, Elizabeth Eoge singlewoman daughter to Margaret Eoge, Oliver Taylor weaver, William Woode, John Rapheson, Oliver Darbishire, the last three were husbandman tenant of the complainant. Other Deponents: Ellen Bradshawe wife of Otes Bradshawe, Margaret Leeche of Little Wardley wife of Nicholas Leeche tenant and servant of the complainant, Thomas Williamson of Eccles co Lancs vicar, John Smithe clerk of the parish church of Eccles, and 51 others. It is a fair copy, all more or less legible, but there is a mass more from April 11th, less easy to read.
 +
*STAC 5/B38/28 - I D - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Shirrington, Richard Brooke
 +
*STAC 5/B103/35 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Sherington et al
 +
*STAC 5/B91/6 - B Dr - 33 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Sherington
 +
*STAC 5/B110/29 - A -  28 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Sherington
 +
**see also [[STAC Brereton]] for other probable references
  
 
''' Byron v Smith '''
 
''' Byron v Smith '''
Line 305: Line 314:
 
*STAC 5/R1/29 - B - 1 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Rafeson v Peter Hoope, Peter Arpeshawe, Henry Aspeshawe, Richard Pickering, Thomas Persyville et al.  
 
*STAC 5/R1/29 - B - 1 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Rafeson v Peter Hoope, Peter Arpeshawe, Henry Aspeshawe, Richard Pickering, Thomas Persyville et al.  
 
**Transcribed [[STAC 5/R1/29]]
 
**Transcribed [[STAC 5/R1/29]]
 +
**Assault in Warrington, Lancashire - STAC 5/R1/29
 
**see also [[STAC Rafeson]]
 
**see also [[STAC Rafeson]]
  
Line 316: Line 326:
 
''' Ridings v Travis '''  
 
''' Ridings v Travis '''  
 
*STAC 5/R1/38 - B - 44 Eliz - Lancashire - James Rydynges v Jervise Trevis, Troylus Trevis, Ralph Trevis Transcribed [[STAC 5/R1/38]]
 
*STAC 5/R1/38 - B - 44 Eliz - Lancashire - James Rydynges v Jervise Trevis, Troylus Trevis, Ralph Trevis Transcribed [[STAC 5/R1/38]]
 +
**Bill of James Rydinges of Chytham in the parish of Manchester co Lancaster, lynnen draper. - STAC 5/R1/38
 
*STAC 7/14/28 - - - Lancashire - James Rydinges v Jervis Travis
 
*STAC 7/14/28 - - - Lancashire - James Rydinges v Jervis Travis
 
**TNA Note: Manchester: Destruction of a cottage.
 
**TNA Note: Manchester: Destruction of a cottage.
Line 328: Line 339:
 
*STAC 5/S44/26 - B A C I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, Thomas Valentyne et al
 
*STAC 5/S44/26 - B A C I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, Thomas Valentyne et al
 
*STAC 5/S35/23 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton et al
 
*STAC 5/S35/23 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton et al
 +
**Interrs refer to closes called Pelton Hay als Pendleton Hey & Pendilton Hey Mosse. Depositions taken at Manchester, Lancs.(dk) - STAC 5/S35/23
 
*STAC 5/S18/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton et al
 
*STAC 5/S18/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton et al
 
*STAC 5/S18/35 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton
 
*STAC 5/S18/35 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton
Line 334: Line 346:
 
*STAC 5/S69/9 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, William Styrrop et al
 
*STAC 5/S69/9 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, William Styrrop et al
 
**Complt Gilbert Sherington refers to himself, Rauffe Worseley, John Gawen, Elen Smythe, Alice Lomas, Rycharde Sanderson, Robarte Bordeman and Adam Traves having been found at Star Chamber to have comitted riot by reason of entry into a cottage at Pendleton Hey, Lancs, having conspired to indict Anne Styrroppe of having stolen a shovel, and to indict William Styrroppe for poisoning the said Anne then his wife. False depositions, perjury.(dk)
 
**Complt Gilbert Sherington refers to himself, Rauffe Worseley, John Gawen, Elen Smythe, Alice Lomas, Rycharde Sanderson, Robarte Bordeman and Adam Traves having been found at Star Chamber to have comitted riot by reason of entry into a cottage at Pendleton Hey, Lancs, having conspired to indict Anne Styrroppe of having stolen a shovel, and to indict William Styrroppe for poisoning the said Anne then his wife. False depositions, perjury.(dk)
 +
 
**Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 29r. Sherrington, plaintiff; Brereton et al: for perjury in giving a verdict for Her Majesty being of a coroner’s inquest and for some others for giving evidence for Her Majesty upon indictment of an another to the coroner’s inquest, the which the court much misliked and therefore referred for dismission to the justice. Hillary 27 Elizabeth (kk)  
 
**Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 29r. Sherrington, plaintiff; Brereton et al: for perjury in giving a verdict for Her Majesty being of a coroner’s inquest and for some others for giving evidence for Her Majesty upon indictment of an another to the coroner’s inquest, the which the court much misliked and therefore referred for dismission to the justice. Hillary 27 Elizabeth (kk)  
 
**see also [[STAC Sherington]]
 
**see also [[STAC Sherington]]
Line 340: Line 353:
 
*STAC 5/S37/19 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - George Sherington v Thomas Tyldesly, William Holland et al
 
*STAC 5/S37/19 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - George Sherington v Thomas Tyldesly, William Holland et al
 
**Gylberte Sheryngton of Grays Inn, Middx. Pendleton Hay More in Worsley, Lancs.(dk)
 
**Gylberte Sheryngton of Grays Inn, Middx. Pendleton Hay More in Worsley, Lancs.(dk)
 +
*STAC 7/15/27 - - - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldesley
 +
**TNA Note: Tyldesley: Manor etc - STAC 7/15/27
 
*STAC 5/S71/39 - I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Hollande, Thomas Tyldesly et al
 
*STAC 5/S71/39 - I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Hollande, Thomas Tyldesly et al
 
*STAC 5/S83/3 - Rn I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Holland, Peter Holland et al
 
*STAC 5/S83/3 - Rn I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Holland, Peter Holland et al
 
*STAC 5/S11/1 - I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Holland  
 
*STAC 5/S11/1 - I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Holland  
 +
*STAC 5/S24/7 - I D - 28 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Thurston Tadesley, Edward Tildesley et al
 
**Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 44v. No witness to be examined touching a man’s title that is no party to the suit in this court. Sherrington, plaintiff; Holland: for perjury and the plaintiff in his bill set forth matter against Mr Brereton, title to a close which had been dismissed here and in the Duchy court, and therefore the court ordered that he should examine no witness concerning his title but only touching the perjury against the said defendant in this suit for that Mr Brereton was not party to this suit. Trinity 28 Elizabeth (kk)
 
**Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 44v. No witness to be examined touching a man’s title that is no party to the suit in this court. Sherrington, plaintiff; Holland: for perjury and the plaintiff in his bill set forth matter against Mr Brereton, title to a close which had been dismissed here and in the Duchy court, and therefore the court ordered that he should examine no witness concerning his title but only touching the perjury against the said defendant in this suit for that Mr Brereton was not party to this suit. Trinity 28 Elizabeth (kk)
 
**see also [[STAC Sherington]] for more possible references
 
**see also [[STAC Sherington]] for more possible references
Line 393: Line 409:
 
**Int to be ministered unto William Saunderson Thurstan Eckersall Peter Valentyne by Thomas egerton Esquire for HM AG. Complainant against Gilbert Sherington Esquire def. First whether do you know or have heard that Gilbert sherington Esquire by a decree or judgement in the Starre Chamber in Aprill in the xxxjth yere of HM reigne or thereaboutes was convicted of divers crymes and misdemeanours at the suyte of Richard Brereton Esquire . . . have you heard him say that he could not have lawe . .
 
**Int to be ministered unto William Saunderson Thurstan Eckersall Peter Valentyne by Thomas egerton Esquire for HM AG. Complainant against Gilbert Sherington Esquire def. First whether do you know or have heard that Gilbert sherington Esquire by a decree or judgement in the Starre Chamber in Aprill in the xxxjth yere of HM reigne or thereaboutes was convicted of divers crymes and misdemeanours at the suyte of Richard Brereton Esquire . . . have you heard him say that he could not have lawe . .
 
**Summaries of various depositions taken in Manchester. Iincluding: William Saunderson of Swynton in co Lanc weaver, tenant to the deft, aged 48 John Valentine of Wardley co Lanc weaver tenant to the def, aged 29.
 
**Summaries of various depositions taken in Manchester. Iincluding: William Saunderson of Swynton in co Lanc weaver, tenant to the deft, aged 48 John Valentine of Wardley co Lanc weaver tenant to the def, aged 29.
 +
**Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 56r. For slandering the sentence and decree of the court. Attorney Rex, plaintiff; Sherrington: for slandering the sentence and proceedings of this court in saying that the decree is uncertain and grounded upon records rested by his adversaries’ counsel contrary to truth without any direct witness and that by law he ought not to perform the same for that he was convicted upon untrue surmises and presumptions and that he could not with a safe conscience perform the same decree, that he was not fully heard, that he was outlaid and oppressed by the countenance of great persons, that his cause was good but that might had overcome right, that he had been hardly dealt with, and that he could not have justice in the said cause and that he could not be heard there, for which insolent content and misdemeanor being a counsellor and a reader of an Inn of Court, in derogation of the court and dishonor of the sentence he was committed and fined at 1000 marks, expulsed Gray’s Inn, and sequestered from his practice during his life, to go up and down Westminster with a paper on his head declaring his offences. Hillary 35 Elizabeth (kk) - STAC 5/A6/33
 +
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 56v. A prisoner bailed upon recognizance to return home and the performance of his sentence respited. Sherrington, being prisoner in the Fleet, was by order of the Lord Keeper taken [about?] his house bailed of his imprisonment upon entering into recognizance to yield his body again prisoner within 10 days warning and the performance of the decree was also respited until Her Majesty’s pleasure were known. Trinity 35 Elizabeth (kk)
 
*STAC 5/A51/9 - I D - 35 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherington
 
*STAC 5/A51/9 - I D - 35 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherington
 
**see also [[STAC Sherington]]
 
**see also [[STAC Sherington]]

Revision as of 03:49, 18 June 2019

Lancashire

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

A

Ambrose v Richardson

  • STAC 5/A47/11 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 31 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Ambrose v Isabella Heskett, Ann Richardson
  • STAC 5/A58/16 - B - Lancashire - Thomas Ambrose v Anne Richardson, William Richardson
  • STAC 5/A4/36 - B - 37 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Ambrose v Thomas Richardson et uxor, William Richardson et uxor
    • Ambrosse Hall Woodplumpton co Lancaster.
  • STAC 5/A34/37 - I D - 32 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Ambrose v Ann Richardson, Isabell Haskell

Anderton v Preston

  • STAC 5/A4/25 - B A C I D - Hil 21 Eliz - Lancashire - Christopher Anderton, et Dorothy uxor, James Anderton (son of Christopher) v Christopher Preston, Thomas Bradley
    • Rectory and parsonage of Cartmeale co Lancashire.
    • see also STAC Anderton

Anderton v Yate

  • STAC 5/A46/17 - B Dr - 37 Eliz - Lancashire - James Anderton v James Yate Sr, James Yate Jr
  • STAC 5/A1/20 - B A C - 37 Eliz - Lancashire - James Anderton v Roger Heaton, Ferdinand, John Yate, Robert Heaton, James Yate Sr, James Yate Jr, Richard Horrabyn, William Marshe
    • James Anderton of Lostockt in co Lancaster esquire.
  • STAC 5/A56/15 - Rn - 37 Eliz - Lancashire - James Anderton v James Yate Sr, James Yate Jr
  • STAC 5/A57/37 - D - 37 Eliz - Lancashire - James Anderton v Joan Heton, John Wason et al
  • STAC 5/A44/38 - I D - 37 Eliz - Lancashire - James Anderton v James Yeate Sr, James Yeate Jr, Richard Horrobin et al
  • STAC 5/A13 /27 - I D - 37 Eliz - Lancashire - James Anderton v James Yate et al
  • STAC 5/A38/13 - I D - 37 Eliz - Lancashire - James Anderton v James Yate Sr et al
  • STAC 5/A36/33 - I D - 37 Eliz - Lancashire - James Anderton v James Yate Sr et al
  • STAC 5/A27/4 - I - 37 Eliz - Lancashire - James Anderton v James Yate et al

Athertone v Winstanley

  • STAC 5/A1/36 - B - Trin 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Alexander Atherton v Ellen Wynstanley, Alice Wynstanley, Elizabeth Wynstanley see transcription STAC 5/A1/36
  • STAC 5/A22/33 - B A C I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Alexander Atherton v Ellen Wynstanley, Alice Wynstanley et al see transcription STAC 5/A22/33
  • STAC 7/17/28 - - - Lancashire - Alexander Athertonn v Eleanor Winstanley et al

B

Bacon v Trafford

  • STAC 5/B9/7 - B A Dr - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Bacon v Edmond Thomas Trafford, Thomas Goodyere, Robert Burgess et al
    • Thomas Bacon of London. Lease of tithe barn & tithe corn of Stretford, Lancs.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B18/31 - I D - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Bacon v Thomas Goodyer

Bond v Trickett and Johnson

  • STAC 5/B59/20 - B A - 44 Eliz - Lancashire - William Bond v Henry Trickett, Arthur Johnson
  • STAC 5/B64/12 - I D - 44 Eliz - Lancashire - William Bonde v Henry Trickett
  • STAC 5/B16/37 - I D - 44 Eliz - Lancashire - William Bonde v Arthur Johnson
  • STAC 7/10/33 - - - Lancashire - William Bonde v Henry Trickett, Arthur Johnson
    • TNA Note: Illegally holding the livings of Marston and Dowbridge.
    • see also STAC Bond

Booth v Trafford

  • STAC 5/B87/14 - I D - 23 Eliz - Lancashire - Ellen Booth et al v Edmund Trafford, William Hulme, John Hulme
  • STAC 5/B63/5 - B A C - 24 Eliz - Lancashire - Eleanor Booth, Anne Booth, Katherine Booth, Dorothy Booth v Sir Edmund Trafford, William Bagnshaw, John Barlow
  • STAC 7/18/40 - - - Lancashire - Elyn Boothe et al v Sir Edmund Trafford et al
  • STAC 5/B68/5 - A - 23 Eliz - Lancashire - Ellen Booth, Ann Booth v Robert Worsley, George Dyckens
    • Barton & Salforde, Lancaster. Also involves Edmunde Trafforde Esqr & Margaret his wife. Answer of George Byron to the bill of Elyn Booth, widow. Answers of Roberte Worsley Esqr & George Dyckens to the bill of Ellen Booth widow, Anne Booth, Dorothie Booth & Katherin Booth
    • see also STAC Booth

Brereton v Sherrington

  • STAC 5/B90/5 - B - 24 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Shirrington, Adam Traves et al
    • Richard Brereton of Worseley, Lancs. Close called Pendleton Hay als Pelton Hay in Swynton Moore in the hamlet of Swynton in Worseley. Suits at court of Duchy of Lancaster.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B8/32 - B A Rn C I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Sir John Radcliffe, Gilbert Sherington, Ralphe Worseley et al
  • STAC 5/B27/4 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Sherington, Ralph Worsley et al
  • STAC 5/B87/40 - I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Adam Traves, Gilbert Sherington
  • STAC 5/B110/5 - I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v John Hollinworth et al
  • STAC 5/B108/4 - I D Rr - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Ralf Worseley, Richard Sanderson et al
  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 24r. Practice and misdemeanor in causing witnesses to confess themselves perjured and to accuse the plaintiff of procurement of perjury. Brereton, plaintiff; Sherrington et al: for practicing to accuse the plaintiff of procurement of perjury and for practicing to cause the plaintiff’s witnesses in a formal cause to retract their testimonies and so draw them by practice to confess in their answers in this court that they were perjured in deposing for the plaintiff before, for which the defendants were fined at £200, Fleet, sequestered from practice, and to ask the plaintiff’s forgiveness. Easter 31 Elizabeth (kk)

Brereton v Sherrington

  • STAC 5/B1/39 - B A C I D - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Sherrington, Richard Brooke, John Gawen, Giles Lomas, Alice Lomas et al
    • The Bill is difficult, a lot of interrogatories, depositions taken at Manchester 1st April Anno 30 Eliz. Deponents from Worsley co Lancaster: William Eoge weaver, Thomas Partington husbandman, Elizabeth Eoge singlewoman daughter to Margaret Eoge, Oliver Taylor weaver, William Woode, John Rapheson, Oliver Darbishire, the last three were husbandman tenant of the complainant. Other Deponents: Ellen Bradshawe wife of Otes Bradshawe, Margaret Leeche of Little Wardley wife of Nicholas Leeche tenant and servant of the complainant, Thomas Williamson of Eccles co Lancs vicar, John Smithe clerk of the parish church of Eccles, and 51 others. It is a fair copy, all more or less legible, but there is a mass more from April 11th, less easy to read.
  • STAC 5/B38/28 - I D - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Shirrington, Richard Brooke
  • STAC 5/B103/35 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Sherington et al
  • STAC 5/B91/6 - B Dr - 33 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Sherington
  • STAC 5/B110/29 - A - 28 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Brereton v Gilbert Sherington

Byron v Smith

  • STAC 5/B21/31 - B A Rr C I D - 38 Eliz - Lancashire - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smith
    • Sir John Byron of Newstead, Notts, steward of the manor of Ratchdale, Lancs. Riot & destruction of enclosures.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B49/39 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Lancashire - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smyth
  • STAC 5/B67/13 - C I D - 38 Eliz - Lancashire - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smythe

C

Calcott v Ashton

  • STAC 5/C14/24 - B A - 33 Eliz - Lancashire, London - John Calcott v James Ashton, William Ashton
    • Bill: John Calcott citizen and Merchant Taylor of London. One Thomas Langton of Waulton [?Walton] co Lancaster. esq about 7 years now last past became bound for the true payment of one hundred and four score pounds at a day then to come and now past about six years. Chancery writt. Lancashire sheriff refused to arrest him. Answer dated13 Nov Anno 33 Eliz.
  • STAC 5/C24/11 - B A C - 34 Eliz - Lancashire, London - John Calcott v James Ashton, William Ashton
  • STAC 5/C36/18 - I D - 34 Eliz - Lancashire, London - John Calcott v William Ashton
  • STAC 5/C80/33 - Rn - Lancashire, London - John Calcot v James Atheton, William Atheton

Cavendish v Worsley

  • STAC 5/C30/37 - B A - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - William Cavendishe v Robert Worsley, Thomas Barnes
  • STAC 5/C78/29 - Rn - - Lancashire - William Cavendish v Robert Worsley
  • STAC 5/C2/31 - I D - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - William Cavendish v Thomas Barnes
  • STAC 5/C20/19 - I D - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - William Cavendish v Robert Worsley et al

Corkonskell v Corkonskell

  • STAC 5/C69/19 - B - 28 Eliz - Lancashire, Cumberland - Rowland Corkonskell v William Corkonskell
    • Rowland Cockanskell of Ursock, Lancs son & heir of Robert Cockanskell of Ursock, decd, husbandman v Willm Cockenskell, uncle of the complt. Lands in manor of Mycheland, Lancs & manor of Myllam, Cumberland. (dk)
    • see also STAC Corkonskell

D

Danyell v Bennett

  • STAC 5/D12/8 - B A C I D - 31 Eliz - Lancashire - John Daryell or Damyell v William Benett, Christopher Benett, George Benett
  • STAC 5/D40/23 - Rn - 31 Eliz - Lancashire - John Daniel v Cristopher Bennett, Peter Bennett
  • STAC 7/11/22 - - - Lancashire - John Danyell v Robert Bennett, Peter Bennett, Christopher Bennett
    • TNA Note: Perjury in a suit for debt in the Chamber of the Duchy of Lancaster, and as to riot and forcible entry.
  • STAC 5/D9/3 - I D - 31 Eliz - Lancashire - John Daniel v Christopher Bennett et al
    • Debt. Deponent Christopher Bennett (one of the defts) is from Cheshire (dk) - STAC 5/D9/3
    • see also STAC Daniel

Dawber v Roughly

Delabere, John

  • STAC 5/D23/26 - B A Rr C I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John DelaBere v William Huddleston, Richard Bell, Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al
  • STAC 5/D42/23 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Huddleston, Francis Tayler et al
  • STAC 5/D17/11 - I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
  • STAC 5/D8/24 - I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
  • STAC 5/D35/1 - I D - Mich 40/41 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston et al
  • STAC 5/D36/20 - B A Rr C I D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston et al
  • STAC 5/D28/15 - D C - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
  • STAC 5/D22/24 - C I D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston, Francis Taylor et al
  • STAC 5/D38/52 - R - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al
  • STAC 5/D38/53 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston, Francis Taylor et al
  • STAC 7/2/22 - - - Cumberland Lancaster - John De la Bere v William Huddlestone, Thomas Flemmynge et al
    • STAC 7/2/22 - TNA Notes: Santon etc: Forgery of title deeds to lands late of Sir John Huddlestone, and assault
    • see also STAC Delabere

Delawarre v Briddock

  • STAC 5/D40/12 - I D - 9 Eliz - Lancashire - William Lord DelaWarre v Edward Briddock, John Hulton et al
    • Interrs ref the destruction of ditches at Collihurst. No county stated, but deponents from Lancs.(dk)
    • see also STAC Delaware

Delawarre v Cleydon

  • STAC 5/D2/17 - B A C I D - 17 Eliz - Lancashire - Lord Delawarre v Robert Cleydon, Robert Haugh, Adam Bowker, Ralph Traviss, Ralph Dosterdyne et al
    • Pasture called Collyhurste in Manchester, Lancs. Interference with workmen creating ditched and fences to divide up the ground, and destruction of the ditches and fences.(dk)
  • STAC 5/W13/38 - I D - 17 Eliz - Lancashire - William West Lord De la Ware v Robert Cleydon
  • STAC 5/D27/3 - B - 20 Eliz - Lancashire - Lord De la Warr v Robert Cleydon, Robert Halgh, Thomas Greenhalgh Esq

E

Eccleston v Sonkey

  • STAC 5/E1/1 - B A - Easter 34 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Eccleston v Edward Sonkey, Philip Langton, Thomas Serjeant, Adam Holme
    • Henry Eccleston of Eccleston Lancs esq. Edward Sonkey of Sonkey Lancs owed him three score pounds on a bond. Action in Common Pleas at Westminster
  • STAC 5/E9/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Eccleston v William Haseldon, William Naylor, Robert Chadock
  • STAC 5/E10/34 - I D - 34 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Eccleston v Edward Sonkey, Thomas Serjeant et al
    • Deponents 27 April Anno 34 Eliz: Edward Sonkey of Sonkey Lancashire gentleman aged 28, Thomas Sergeante? of Newton Lancashire yeoman
    • see also STAC Ecclestone

Egerton v Turner

  • STAC 5/E7/12 - B A Rn - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - John Egerton v Augustine Turner, Peter Powell et al
    • Bill badly damaged. Ferry of Tranmor & Seacon on the River Mersey at Liverpool, Lancashire.(dk)
  • STAC 5/E17/3 - A - - Lancashire - John Egerton v Roger Powell, Augustine Turner
  • STAC 5/E5/4 - I D - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - John Egerton v Augustine Turner, Roger Powell

F

Farrington v Breworth

  • STAC 5/F24/17 - B A C I D - 31 Eliz - Lancashire - William Farrington v Thomas Breworth, John Aynesworth
    • Bill damaged. Procurement to cancel indenture of lease of tithe corn of Longton, Lancs. Large number of depositions taken at Blackburn.(dk)
    • see also STAC Farrington

Farrington v Charnock

  • STAC 5/F18/17 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 18 Eliz - Lancashire - William Farrington v Jenkyn Clayton, Roger Charnocke, Richard Shawe et al
  • STAC 5/F19/5 - B A C I D - 18 Eliz - Lancashire - William Farrington v Robert Charnock, Thomas Woodcocke et al
  • STAC 5/F9/25 - I D - 18 Eliz - Lancashire - William Farrington v Thomas Charnocke, Thomas Woodcocke et al
    • Interrogatories to be ministered to Thomas Charnocke, Roger Charnocke & Thomas Woodcock three of the defts by Willm Farrington esq complt, include: Were you present at Leylande, Lancs the 30 Sep last when Oliver Ashetone servant to Francis Holte esq, the sheriff of Lancs by virtue of a writ caused the hedges & fences of various improvements at Leyland to be laid open. Interrogatories to be ministered to Robert Charnock esq. Deponents 12 Feb Anno18 Eliz: Thomas Woodcocke of Leyland Lancashire. Roger Charnocke servant to Edmunde ….lesty esq. Thomas Charnocke of Leyland Lancashire. Robert Charnocke of?Farrington Lancashire esquire
    • see also STAC Farrington

Farrington v Fleetwood

  • STAC 5/F23/9 - B A Dr - 31 Eliz - Lancashire - William Farryngton v John Aynsworth, Thomas Fleetwood et al
  • STAC 5/F24/17 - B A C I D - 31 Eliz - Lancashire - William Farrington v Thomas Breworth, John Aynesworth
  • STAC 5/F22/33 - C I D - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - William Farrington v Thomas Fletwood, John Fletwood, William Sutton
  • STAC 5/F18/39 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - William Farrington v John Aynsworth
  • STAC 5/F29/18 - I D - 32 Eliz - Lancashire - William Farrington v Thomas Fleetwood et al
    • Lancs. see Lancashire Archives DDF 605a & DDF 606: Breviot of Bill of Complaint exhibited in the Star Chamber & William Farrington of Worden, esq., v. John, Thomas and Richard Fleetwood -- tithes and tithe barns of Longton. [1].- STAC 5/F23/9, 5/F22/33, 5/F29/18 - (dk)
    • see also STAC Farrington

Farrington v Orrell

  • STAC 5/F1/19 - B A C - 38 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v Francis Orrell, William Charnoke, Robert Parke, John Blackburne, Thomas Smith
    • Henry Farrington of London gentleman and merchant. Inheritance of land in Lancashire from Sir Henry Farrington knight deceased, his grandfather
  • STAC 5/F7/1 - B A - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v William Farrington, Francis Orrell et al
  • STAC 5/F12/37 - A - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v Isabel Worden
  • STAC 5/F31/36 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v Ann Orell, Francis Orrell, Isabel Werden et al
  • STAC 5/F31/16 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v William Farrington, James Worthington et al
  • STAC 5/F13/5 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v Francis Orrell et al
  • STAC 5/F15/22 - I D - 38 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v Francis Orrell, William Farrington et al
  • STAC 5/F10/22 - I D - 38 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v James Worthington, Peter Marshe et al
  • STAC 5/F5/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v William Cherkocke, William Bushell et al
  • STAC 5/F10/30 - I D - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v Robert Somerscall et al
  • STAC 5/F7/2 - I D - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v Francis Orrell et al
  • STAC 5/F5/17 - I D - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v Isabell Werden, Christopher Rawlinson et al
  • STAC 5/F5/30 - I D - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v Francis Orrell, William Farrington et al
  • STAC 5/F10/5 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v Francis Orrell et al
  • STAC 5/F4/28 - I D - 40 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Farrington v William Bushell et al

Fisher v Fisher

  • STAC 5/F11/3 - B A - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Fisher v William Fisher et uxor, Roger Kirkbye et al
    • That whereas Roger Kyrkkeby Esq . . . land in Wrightington in co Lancaster.
  • STAC 5/F16/27 - I D - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Fysher v William Fysher

Fleming v Colton

  • STAC 5/F3/26 - B A C I D - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Fleminge v Richard Colton, Robert Richardson, John Kirkeby, James Wales et al
    • Thomas Flemminge servant to Roger Kirkbye of Kirkbie Ireleth in co Lancaster.
  • STAC 5/F11/5 - B A - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Flemynge v Richard Colton, Robert Richards et al

Fletcher v Hankey

  • STAC 5/F2/16 - B - 17 Eliz - Lancashire - William Fletcher v George Hankey et uxor, John Boulton, William Hanpye, Thomas Bycrofte et al

Forshawe v Kitchen

  • STAC 5/F3/31 - B - 39 Eliz - Lancashire - John Forshawe v Barnaby Kitchen, Thomas Ashton, Richard Ashton et uxor.
    • John Forshawe of Penwortham in co Lancaster gent, Lands.
    • see also STAC Forshawe

G

H

Hill v Mather

  • STAC 5/H11/32 - B Dr - Hil 29 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Hill v Humfrey Mather, Edmund Chalener, John Bird
    • Thomas Hill of Little Bowlton in the co of Lancaster, yeoman.
    • see also STAC Hill

Hough v Woolsoncroft

  • STAC 5/H53/39 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 17 Eliz - Lancashire - Laurence Hough, Ralph Taylor v Nicholas Woolsoncroft, Charles Bradshawe, et al
    • Laurence Hough and Ralph Taylor yeomen servants to John Radcliffe esquire attacked and wounded by a mob from Pendleton
  • STAC 5/H27/20 - I D - 17 Eliz - Lancashire - Lawrence Houghe, Rauffe Taylor v Charles Bradshaw, William Wharmby et al

I J

Ireland v Bold

  • STAC 5/J19/21 - B A - 41 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Irelande v Richard Bolde, John Ashton et al
  • STAC 5/J18/33 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Ireland v Thomas Barrowe Sr, Henry Bold et al
  • STAC 5/J10/5 - I D - 42 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Ireland v Thomas Bold et al
  • STAC 5/J3/7 - I D - 41 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Ireland v Richard Bold et al
    • Burton Wood, Lancashire.
  • STAC 5/J22/9 - A - 42 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Ireland v Thomas Bold, John Halton et al
  • STAC 5/J20/16 - I D - 41 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Ireland v Thomas Phyppe, John Parker et al
  • STAC 5/J20/29 - I D - 42 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Ireland v John Ashton, Richard Rumbold et al
  • STAC 5/J16/2 - A - 42 Eliz - Lancashire - Thomas Ireland v Henry Taylior

K

Kirkby v Shepherd

  • STAC 5/K2/11 - B - 29 Eliz - Lancashire - Roger Kirkby v Matthew Shepherd, Roger Postlethwaite, John Fisher et al
    • The Manor of Kirkby Ireleth, Lancashire.
  • STAC 5/K2/16 - B - 29 Eliz - Roger Kirkbie v Roger Binson, Thomas Binson, Thomas Fisher, John Hesketh, Ralph Brown et al

L

M

N

O

Orrell v Marshe

  • STAC 5/O1/20 - B A - 42 Eliz - Lancashire - William Orrell v Peter Marshe
  • STAC 5/O3/13 - I D - 43 Eliz - Lancashire - William Orrell v Peter Marshe
    • Interr tbm to Peeter Marshe deft at suit of Willm Orrell, Gent. & Deposition of Peter Marshe of Wiggan, Lancs, Yeoman. (dk)
    • see also STAC Orrell

Orrell v Tarbock

  • STAC 5/O6/26 - B Dr - Mich 30 & 31 Eliz - Lancashire - William Orrell v Edwel Tarbock Sr, Edwel Tarbock Jr, William Whitfield et al.
  • STAC 5/O8/28 - B Dr - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Lancashire - William Orrell v Edward Torbock, Thomas Torbock, Robert Morton et al.
    • William Orrell of Turton in co Lancaster esquire. Land in Tarbock Lancashire.
    • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 47r. An outlawry pleaded yet the plaintiff to proceed for the benefit of Queen. Orrell, plaintiff; Tarbicke. The defendant had pleaded an outlawry to the plaintiff’s bill, whereupon the plaintiff prayed that he might prosecute the same for the benefit of Her Majesty or that Mr Attorney might do the same, for that the bill contained heinous offences the which court ordered at the plaintiff’s election. Michaelmas 31 Elizabeth (kk)
    • see also STAC Orrell

P

Proctor v Law

  • STAC 5/P43/18 - B A I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire NR, Lancashire - John Procter v John Lawe, Nicholas Tempest et al
    • Borderley in Craven co York NR and Clitherow in Lancashire
  • STAC 5/P4/39 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire NR, Lancashire - John Proctor v John Law
  • STAC 5/P7/5 - I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire NR, Lancashire - John Proctor v Richard Grenacres, Nicholas Tempest, Anthony Parker, Thomas Parker, Robert Perkinson
  • STAC 5/P39/33 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Yorkshire NR, Lancashire - John Proctor v Thomas Parker, Richard Greenacres et al
  • STAC 5/P55/7 - C I D - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire NR, Lancashire - John Proctor v Richard Greenacres, Nicholas Tempest et al
  • STAC 5/P44/33 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Yorkshire NR, Lancashire - John Proctor v John Greenacres et al

Q

R

Rafeson v Hoope

  • STAC 5/R1/29 - B - 1 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Rafeson v Peter Hoope, Peter Arpeshawe, Henry Aspeshawe, Richard Pickering, Thomas Persyville et al.

Ratcliffe v Ashton

  • STAC 5/R2/12 - B - Trin 30 Eliz - Lancashire - Owen Ratcliff v Edward Ashton, William Hawworth, John Gabbed, Richard Flitten et al
  • STAC 5/R23/25 - B A C - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - Owen Radcliffe v John Gabbat, Richard Fytton et al
  • STAC 7/14/33 - - - Lancashire - Owen Radclif v Edward Ashton, William Haworth, Robert Holland
  • STAC 5/R24/20 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - Owen Radclyff v Edward Ashton, William Howard et al

Ridings v Travis

  • STAC 5/R1/38 - B - 44 Eliz - Lancashire - James Rydynges v Jervise Trevis, Troylus Trevis, Ralph Trevis Transcribed STAC 5/R1/38
    • Bill of James Rydinges of Chytham in the parish of Manchester co Lancaster, lynnen draper. - STAC 5/R1/38
  • STAC 7/14/28 - - - Lancashire - James Rydinges v Jervis Travis
    • TNA Note: Manchester: Destruction of a cottage.
    • see also STAC Riding

S

Sherington v Brereton

  • STAC 5/S4/23 - B A Rn C I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherrington v Richard Brereton, Thomas Valentine, William Stirroppe, Thomas Edge et al
  • STAC 5/S66/27 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Ellis Haye, William Styrroppe et al
  • STAC 5/S60/35 - I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, Thomas Valentyne
  • STAC 5/S44/26 - B A C I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, Thomas Valentyne et al
  • STAC 5/S35/23 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton et al
    • Interrs refer to closes called Pelton Hay als Pendleton Hey & Pendilton Hey Mosse. Depositions taken at Manchester, Lancs.(dk) - STAC 5/S35/23
  • STAC 5/S18/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton et al
  • STAC 5/S18/35 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton
  • STAC 5/S17/37 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton et al
  • STAC 5/S12/12 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, Richard Newton et al
  • STAC 5/S69/9 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, William Styrrop et al
    • Complt Gilbert Sherington refers to himself, Rauffe Worseley, John Gawen, Elen Smythe, Alice Lomas, Rycharde Sanderson, Robarte Bordeman and Adam Traves having been found at Star Chamber to have comitted riot by reason of entry into a cottage at Pendleton Hey, Lancs, having conspired to indict Anne Styrroppe of having stolen a shovel, and to indict William Styrroppe for poisoning the said Anne then his wife. False depositions, perjury.(dk)
    • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 29r. Sherrington, plaintiff; Brereton et al: for perjury in giving a verdict for Her Majesty being of a coroner’s inquest and for some others for giving evidence for Her Majesty upon indictment of an another to the coroner’s inquest, the which the court much misliked and therefore referred for dismission to the justice. Hillary 27 Elizabeth (kk)
    • see also STAC Sherington

Sherington v Tyldesly and Holland

  • STAC 5/S37/19 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - George Sherington v Thomas Tyldesly, William Holland et al
    • Gylberte Sheryngton of Grays Inn, Middx. Pendleton Hay More in Worsley, Lancs.(dk)
  • STAC 7/15/27 - - - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldesley
    • TNA Note: Tyldesley: Manor etc - STAC 7/15/27
  • STAC 5/S71/39 - I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Hollande, Thomas Tyldesly et al
  • STAC 5/S83/3 - Rn I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Holland, Peter Holland et al
  • STAC 5/S11/1 - I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Holland
  • STAC 5/S24/7 - I D - 28 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Thurston Tadesley, Edward Tildesley et al
    • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 44v. No witness to be examined touching a man’s title that is no party to the suit in this court. Sherrington, plaintiff; Holland: for perjury and the plaintiff in his bill set forth matter against Mr Brereton, title to a close which had been dismissed here and in the Duchy court, and therefore the court ordered that he should examine no witness concerning his title but only touching the perjury against the said defendant in this suit for that Mr Brereton was not party to this suit. Trinity 28 Elizabeth (kk)
    • see also STAC Sherington for more possible references

T

Tyldesley v Tyldesley

  • STAC 5/T29/17 - B A - 19 Eliz - Lancashire - Edward Tyldesley v Lambert Tyldesly, John Tyldesly, Arnold Pennyngton
  • STAC 5/T21/21 - I D - 20 Eliz - Lancashire - Edward Tyldesly v Lambart Tyldesly, Arnold Penyngton et al
  • STAC 7/15/34 - - - Lancashire - Edward Tyldesley v Lambert Tyldesley, John Tyldesley, Francis Grundye, Geoffrey Grundye, Arnold Pynnyngton
    • TNA Note: Tyldesley: Armed interference with a right of way.
  • STAC 5/S53/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - Lancashire - Philippa Sone, Christopher Sone, Robert Tydesly v John Tydesley, Richard Tydesly

UV

W

XYZ

Attorney General

AG v Holmes

  • STAC 5/A58/10 - B - - Lancashire - AG v Robert Holmes, James Elersall et al

AG v Latham

  • STAC 5/A57/34 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Henry Latham, Oliver Manwaring et al
  • STAC 10/1/79 - B - - Lancashire - AG v Henry Lathome et al
    • Lancashire 1600. Assault on John Jenkins and David Jenkins.
    • TNA Note: 1600. Edward Coke, esquire, attorney general v Henry Lathome and others. Assault on John Jenkins and David Jenkins, Lancashire
    • see also STAC Latham

AG v Norris

  • STAC 5/A8/31 - I D - 42 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Edward Norris, Edward Hitchmough, James Pilkington et al
    • In 1600, witnesses recalled that John Poole, a Lancashire saddler and ‘packett maker’ (who was also described as a ‘shiefte maker [who] liveth by his handes’), agreed to testify for a gentleman in return for an unspecified monetary reward, but when the gentleman ‘wold geve him none’ in the event, Poole ‘departed and woulde not sweare’. Hillary Taylor, The price of the poor’s words: social relations and the economics of deposing for one’s ‘betters’ in early modern England., Economic History Review (2018) https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12773 - STAC 5/A8/31, John Pendleton (deposition).
  • STAC 5/A38/31 - C I D - 43 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Edward Norrys et al
  • STAC 5/A47/32 - I D - 43 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Edward Norris et al

AG v Sherington

  • STAC 5/A26/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherington
  • STAC 5/A11/22 - A - 33 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherington
    • Deposition of Alyce the wife of Giles Lomas of Little Wordley [? Worsley] co Lanc aged 46. STAC 5/A7/40
    • Case Book Report STAC 5/A11/22r
  • STAC 5/A7/40 - I D - 34 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherrington
  • STAC 5/A6/33 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherrington
    • Int to be ministered unto William Saunderson Thurstan Eckersall Peter Valentyne by Thomas egerton Esquire for HM AG. Complainant against Gilbert Sherington Esquire def. First whether do you know or have heard that Gilbert sherington Esquire by a decree or judgement in the Starre Chamber in Aprill in the xxxjth yere of HM reigne or thereaboutes was convicted of divers crymes and misdemeanours at the suyte of Richard Brereton Esquire . . . have you heard him say that he could not have lawe . .
    • Summaries of various depositions taken in Manchester. Iincluding: William Saunderson of Swynton in co Lanc weaver, tenant to the deft, aged 48 John Valentine of Wardley co Lanc weaver tenant to the def, aged 29.
    • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 56r. For slandering the sentence and decree of the court. Attorney Rex, plaintiff; Sherrington: for slandering the sentence and proceedings of this court in saying that the decree is uncertain and grounded upon records rested by his adversaries’ counsel contrary to truth without any direct witness and that by law he ought not to perform the same for that he was convicted upon untrue surmises and presumptions and that he could not with a safe conscience perform the same decree, that he was not fully heard, that he was outlaid and oppressed by the countenance of great persons, that his cause was good but that might had overcome right, that he had been hardly dealt with, and that he could not have justice in the said cause and that he could not be heard there, for which insolent content and misdemeanor being a counsellor and a reader of an Inn of Court, in derogation of the court and dishonor of the sentence he was committed and fined at 1000 marks, expulsed Gray’s Inn, and sequestered from his practice during his life, to go up and down Westminster with a paper on his head declaring his offences. Hillary 35 Elizabeth (kk) - STAC 5/A6/33
  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 56v. A prisoner bailed upon recognizance to return home and the performance of his sentence respited. Sherrington, being prisoner in the Fleet, was by order of the Lord Keeper taken [about?] his house bailed of his imprisonment upon entering into recognizance to yield his body again prisoner within 10 days warning and the performance of the decree was also respited until Her Majesty’s pleasure were known. Trinity 35 Elizabeth (kk)
  • STAC 5/A51/9 - I D - 35 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherington

AG v Standish

  • STAC 5/A52/27 - B A - 45 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Leonard Standish, Thomas Croke, Alexander Standish, James Aynescough, John Becke, Geffry Wasley et al
    • Bill: Whereas Edward Rigbye of the Burghe co Lancaster Esquire Justice of Peace. . . Four Answers.
  • STAC 5/A43/3 - I D - 45 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Alexander Standish

AG v Woodfall

  • STAC 7/1/8 - - - Lancashire - AG (Edward Coke) v John Woodfalle, Adam Hayward, Edward Eccleston, William Standishe, et al
    • TNA Note: Prescott: Resistance to search for warrants.
    • see also STAC Woodfall

[Unknown] v [Unknown]

  • STAC 10/2/45 - D - - Lancashire -
    • TNA note: Damaged deposition, taken by commission in Lancashire. Deponents include Cuthbert Clyfton, esquire, of Westby, James Davy of Ribby, James Bradley, gentleman, and others. Relates to land on the banks of the river Ribble.


Palmer's cumulative totals of Star Chamber fines preserved in the E159s (rp)

  • TNA E159/350 Michaelmas Term, 6 Elizabeth. Fine paid 26 October 1564
    • From Robert Holme of Manchester, Lancs, gent: £100.
    • From James Eckersall of Manchester, yeoman: £100.
    • These fines were set upon the said persons for making an affray upon a preacher immediately upon the sermon made.
  • TNA E159/366 Hilary Term, 16 Elizabeth. Fine paid
    • From Alan Hulton de Farneworth, Lancs, armiger: £40.
    • From Roger Halton de Bowlton, Lancs, gent: £15.
    • From Richard Dutton of Chester, merchant: £10.
    • From William Scofeld de Bowlton: £10.
    • From William Draper, jr, de Bowlton: £10.
    • From Richard Woodward late de Bowlton: £10.
    • From James Rothewell de Leyver, Lancs: £10.
  • TNA E159/385 Michaelmas Term, 24-25 Elizabeth. Fine Paid. 1582
    • First, from Edmund Trafforde de Trafford, Lancs, knight: £10.
    • From Robert Woorseley de Bathes, Lancs: £10.
    • From Robert Charnock de Asteley, Lancs: £5.
  • TNA E159/389 Trinity Term, 27 Elizabeth. Fine Paid
    • From John Arrundell, knight: 1,000 marks.
    • From Thomas Tresham, knight: £100.
    • From John Hocknell de Prentell, Ches: £50.
    • From Mathew Travers de Prescott, Lancs: £50.
  • TNA E159/391 Easter Term, 28 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1586
    • From Gilbert Sherington de Wordley in Worsley, Lancs, armiger: £200.
    • From John Ratcliff de Ordsall, Lancs, knight: £30.
    • From Ralph Worseley de Pemberton, Lancs: £10.
    • From Robert Wordman de Tyldesley, Lancs, laborer: £10.
    • From Adam Travis, servant to the said Gilbert Sherington: £10.
    • From Richard Saunderson de Worseley: £10.
    • From Alice Lommas de Worseley: £10.
    • From John Gawen de Worseley: £10.
    • From Helena Smythe de Abram, Lancs: £10.
  • TNA E159/395 Easter Term, 30 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1588
    • From Blaunch Hesketh, late wife of William Stopforde, gent, de Bysbum, Lancs, now wife of Robert Hesketh, armiger and to be levied from him: £200.
  • TNA E159/397 Easter Term, 31 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1589
    • From Gilbert Sherington de Wordeley, Lancs, armiger, and Richard Brooke de Toddington, Lancs, husbandman: 200 marks.
    • From Richard Ryther de Southwark, Surrey: £6 13s 4d.
  • TNA E159/404 Hilary Term, 35 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1593
    • From Gilbert Bybbye de Salforde, Lancs, gent: £10.
  • TNA E159/412 Michaelmas Terms, 38-39 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1596
    • From Gilbert Sherington de Wordley, Lancs, armiger: £50.
  • TNA E159/415 Easter Term, 40 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1598
    • From George Bretherton de Croston, Lancs: £40.
    • From Thomas Hodgeson de Croston, Lancs: £40.
    • From Thomas Hodges de Croston, Lancs: £40.
    • From James Stopford de Croston, Lancs: £40.
    • From Richard Ansted de Croston, Lancs: £40.
  • TNA E159/417 Trinity Term, 41 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1599
    • From James Banckes de Winstanley, Lancs, gent, and Zuzanna his wife: £200.
    • From Adam Banckes de Wynstanley, Lancs, yeoman: £20.
    • From Ralph Greene de Wynstanley, Lancs, yeoman: £20.
    • From William Dawber de Orrell, Lancs: £6 13s 4d.
    • From Robert Toppinge de Blackrod, Lancs, yeoman: £6 13s 4d.
    • From Gilbert Barton de Wynstanley, Lancs, yeoman: £6 13s 4d.
    • From Anthony Blackamore de Wynstanley, Lancs, yeoman: £6 13s 4d.
    • From Anna Woodde de Wynstantley, Lancs: £6 13s 4d.
  • TNA E159/421 Hilary Term, 43 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1601
    • From William Standyshe de Scoldes in the twon of Egleston, Lancs: £400
    • From Robert Darbyshire de Wyndle, Lancs: £200.
    • From John Woodfall de Sutton, Lancs: £200.
    • From Brian Heyward de Parr, Lancs: £200.
    • (Order that said Stanyshe will pay the fines of said Darbyshire, Woodfall, and Heyward if they are unable to do so.)
  • TNA E159/421 Michaelmas Term, 43-44 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1601
    • From William Farrington de Worden, Lancs, armiger: £100.