Difference between revisions of "STAC co Huntingdon"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' Huntingdonshire ''' | ''' Huntingdonshire ''' | ||
| − | NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed. | + | *Adams v Rotheram |
| + | *Alexander v Gonner | ||
| + | *Altham v Browne and Ward | ||
| + | *Astry v Pearles | ||
| + | *Bowyer v Andrews | ||
| + | *Colbourne v Chambers | ||
| + | *Felton v Adcock | ||
| + | *Ferrers v Seale | ||
| + | *Foster v Weekes | ||
| + | *Frowicke v Gates | ||
| + | *Heytsbury Almshouse Keepers v Hungerford | ||
| + | *Hyde v Jennings alias Chenell | ||
| + | *Knollys v Coxon | ||
| + | *Skeggs v Shackeley | ||
| + | *Snagge v Morgan | ||
| + | *St Albans Corporation v Clark | ||
| + | *Almoner v ap Nicholas - Almoner v Burling - Almoner v Forster - Almoner v Hinde | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' NOTA BENE ''' - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' A ''' | ||
''' Ashton v Dorington ''' | ''' Ashton v Dorington ''' | ||
| Line 10: | Line 30: | ||
''' Audeley v Swynborne ''' | ''' Audeley v Swynborne ''' | ||
*Gransden field, near Gransden house. Modern Cambridgeshire, but probably Huntingdonshire. STAC 5/A7/27 | *Gransden field, near Gransden house. Modern Cambridgeshire, but probably Huntingdonshire. STAC 5/A7/27 | ||
| − | *STAC 5/A18/9 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Robert Awdley v Nicholas Swynborne et al | + | *STAC 5/A18/9 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Awdley v Nicholas Swynborne et al |
*STAC 5/A7/27 - I D - 33 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Audeley v Nicholas Swynborne, John Reston, John Kidman et al | *STAC 5/A7/27 - I D - 33 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Audeley v Nicholas Swynborne, John Reston, John Kidman et al | ||
| − | *STAC 5/A34/19 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Robert Awdeley v Simon Swinborne, John Reston et al | + | *STAC 5/A34/19 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Awdeley v Simon Swinborne, John Reston et al |
| − | *STAC 5/A40/38 - I D - 29 Eliz - Robert Awdeley v Nicholas Swinborn et al | + | *STAC 5/A40/38 - I D - 29 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Awdeley v Nicholas Swinborn et al |
*see also [[STAC Audley]] | *see also [[STAC Audley]] | ||
| − | + | ||
''' B ''' | ''' B ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | ''' C ''' | ||
| + | |||
''' Castell v Goddale ''' | ''' Castell v Goddale ''' | ||
*Robert Castell, that whereas your highness said subject being lawfully seized of his demesne as of fee and in one parcell of ground enclosed by the space of fifty years or thereaboutes commonly known by the name of Neweclose lying and being within your highness manor of Glatton in the county of Huntington. (Riotous destruction of crops.) STAC 5/C2/17 Bill | *Robert Castell, that whereas your highness said subject being lawfully seized of his demesne as of fee and in one parcell of ground enclosed by the space of fifty years or thereaboutes commonly known by the name of Neweclose lying and being within your highness manor of Glatton in the county of Huntington. (Riotous destruction of crops.) STAC 5/C2/17 Bill | ||
| Line 35: | Line 57: | ||
*STAC 5/C30/12 - B A Rr R - Mich 27/28 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Sir Henry Cromwell v William Mascall, Andrew Thorowgoode, William Mills et al | *STAC 5/C30/12 - B A Rr R - Mich 27/28 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Sir Henry Cromwell v William Mascall, Andrew Thorowgoode, William Mills et al | ||
*see also [[STAC Cromwell]] | *see also [[STAC Cromwell]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' D ''' | ||
''' Dickons v Henson ''' | ''' Dickons v Henson ''' | ||
| Line 40: | Line 64: | ||
*STAC 7/11/21 - - - Huntingdonshire - Robert Dyckons v Richard Henson | *STAC 7/11/21 - - - Huntingdonshire - Robert Dyckons v Richard Henson | ||
*see also [[STAC Dickons]] | *see also [[STAC Dickons]] | ||
| − | + | ||
''' E ''' | ''' E ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
''' F ''' | ''' F ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | ''' G ''' | ||
| + | |||
''' Geff v Coney ''' | ''' Geff v Coney ''' | ||
*STAC 5/G35/29 - B A Rn C - 29 Eliz - Nicholas Geff v William Cunny, William Thoroughmorton et al | *STAC 5/G35/29 - B A Rn C - 29 Eliz - Nicholas Geff v William Cunny, William Thoroughmorton et al | ||
*STAC 5/J4/8 - D - 29 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Nicholas Jeffes v William Cony | *STAC 5/J4/8 - D - 29 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Nicholas Jeffes v William Cony | ||
| − | *STAC 7/22/5 - - - Nicholas Geffe v William Conye et al | + | *STAC 7/22/5 - - - Huntingdonshire - Nicholas Geffe v William Conye et al |
*see also [[STAC Geff]] | *see also [[STAC Geff]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' H ''' | ||
''' Hollinghedge v Wingfield ''' | ''' Hollinghedge v Wingfield ''' | ||
| Line 55: | Line 83: | ||
*STAC 5/H78/19 - B - - Huntingdonshire - William Hollinghedge alias Holledge, William Goore et al v Sir Edward Wingfeild, Roger Vaughan et al | *STAC 5/H78/19 - B - - Huntingdonshire - William Hollinghedge alias Holledge, William Goore et al v Sir Edward Wingfeild, Roger Vaughan et al | ||
*see also [[STAC Hollingshed]] | *see also [[STAC Hollingshed]] | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | ''' | + | ''' I J ''' |
| − | + | ||
| + | ''' K ''' | ||
| + | |||
''' Kerchivalls v Manchester ''' | ''' Kerchivalls v Manchester ''' | ||
*In re land in Stibbington Huntingdonshire. STAC 5/K4/12 | *In re land in Stibbington Huntingdonshire. STAC 5/K4/12 | ||
*STAC 5/K4/12 - A Rn Rr I D - 38 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Kerchivalls v Robert Manchester, Thomas Thorowgood et al | *STAC 5/K4/12 - A Rn Rr I D - 38 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Kerchivalls v Robert Manchester, Thomas Thorowgood et al | ||
*see also [[STAC Kirchivalls]] | *see also [[STAC Kirchivalls]] | ||
| − | + | ||
''' L ''' | ''' L ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
''' M ''' | ''' M ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
''' N ''' | ''' N ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
''' O ''' | ''' O ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
''' P ''' | ''' P ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
''' Q ''' | ''' Q ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
''' R ''' | ''' R ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | ''' S ''' | ||
| + | |||
''' Skeggs v Henson ''' | ''' Skeggs v Henson ''' | ||
*In re land in the manor of Brampton in co Huntington. STAC 5/S1/8 | *In re land in the manor of Brampton in co Huntington. STAC 5/S1/8 | ||
| − | *STAC 5/S48/4 - B - 16 Eliz - Edward Skeggs v Thomas Henson | + | *STAC 5/S48/4 - B - 16 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Edward Skeggs v Thomas Henson |
| − | *STAC 5/S35/21 - B A - 16 Eliz - Edward Skeggs v Thomas Henson | + | *STAC 5/S35/21 - B A - 16 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Edward Skeggs v Thomas Henson |
*STAC 5/S1/8 - I D - 16 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Edward Skegges v Thomas Heuson or Henson | *STAC 5/S1/8 - I D - 16 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Edward Skegges v Thomas Heuson or Henson | ||
*see also [[STAC Skeggs]] | *see also [[STAC Skeggs]] | ||
| − | + | ||
''' T ''' | ''' T ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
''' UV ''' | ''' UV ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
''' W ''' | ''' W ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
''' XYZ ''' | ''' XYZ ''' | ||
| − | + | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
Revision as of 13:06, 28 November 2016
Huntingdonshire
- Adams v Rotheram
- Alexander v Gonner
- Altham v Browne and Ward
- Astry v Pearles
- Bowyer v Andrews
- Colbourne v Chambers
- Felton v Adcock
- Ferrers v Seale
- Foster v Weekes
- Frowicke v Gates
- Heytsbury Almshouse Keepers v Hungerford
- Hyde v Jennings alias Chenell
- Knollys v Coxon
- Skeggs v Shackeley
- Snagge v Morgan
- St Albans Corporation v Clark
- Almoner v ap Nicholas - Almoner v Burling - Almoner v Forster - Almoner v Hinde
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
A
Ashton v Dorington
- Peter Ashton of Old Weston co Huntingdon lent money to Ambrose Dorington clerk, parson of the parish church of Brington Bythorne and Old Weston. STAC 5/A4/29
- STAC 5/A4/29 - B Dr - Mich 39/40 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Peter Ashton v Ambrose Dorington, Benjamin Fryar
- see also STAC Ashton
Audeley v Swynborne
- Gransden field, near Gransden house. Modern Cambridgeshire, but probably Huntingdonshire. STAC 5/A7/27
- STAC 5/A18/9 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Awdley v Nicholas Swynborne et al
- STAC 5/A7/27 - I D - 33 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Audeley v Nicholas Swynborne, John Reston, John Kidman et al
- STAC 5/A34/19 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Awdeley v Simon Swinborne, John Reston et al
- STAC 5/A40/38 - I D - 29 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Awdeley v Nicholas Swinborn et al
- see also STAC Audley
B
C
Castell v Goddale
- Robert Castell, that whereas your highness said subject being lawfully seized of his demesne as of fee and in one parcell of ground enclosed by the space of fifty years or thereaboutes commonly known by the name of Neweclose lying and being within your highness manor of Glatton in the county of Huntington. (Riotous destruction of crops.) STAC 5/C2/17 Bill
- STAC 5/C2/17 - B A - 38 Eliz - Huntington - Robert Castell v Thomas Goddale, Thomas Levett, William Warnier, Silvester Carter
- see also STAC Castle
Cattle v Storey
- Witness Thomas Granger gent, undersheriff of the county of Hunt: do you know Francis Scargill, Clare and Edward Munday. STAC 5/C1/16 w
- STAC 5/C14/11 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - John Cattell v Matthew Storey, Warren Scargill et al
- STAC 5/C52/37 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - John Cattell v Matthew Storie, Thomas Hatton
- STAC 5/C25/1 - I D - 40 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - John Cattell v Matthew Storie, Warren Scargill, Thomas Hatton
- STAC 5/C1/16 - I D - 41 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - John Cattell v Matthew Storey et al
- see also STAC Cattle
Cromwell v Mascall
- Ramsey, Huntingdon. Referenced in "Ramsey: The Lives of an English Fenland Town, 1200–1600" By Anne Reiber DeWindt, Edwin Brezette DeWindt. STAC 5/C30/12
- STAC 5/C30/12 - B A Rr R - Mich 27/28 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Sir Henry Cromwell v William Mascall, Andrew Thorowgoode, William Mills et al
- see also STAC Cromwell
D
Dickons v Henson
- TNA Note: Forcible entry. STAC 7/11/21
- STAC 7/11/21 - - - Huntingdonshire - Robert Dyckons v Richard Henson
- see also STAC Dickons
E
F
G
Geff v Coney
- STAC 5/G35/29 - B A Rn C - 29 Eliz - Nicholas Geff v William Cunny, William Thoroughmorton et al
- STAC 5/J4/8 - D - 29 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Nicholas Jeffes v William Cony
- STAC 7/22/5 - - - Huntingdonshire - Nicholas Geffe v William Conye et al
- see also STAC Geff
H
Hollinghedge v Wingfield
- KIimbolton, Huntingdon. STAC 5/H78/19
- STAC 5/H78/19 - B - - Huntingdonshire - William Hollinghedge alias Holledge, William Goore et al v Sir Edward Wingfeild, Roger Vaughan et al
- see also STAC Hollingshed
I J
K
Kerchivalls v Manchester
- In re land in Stibbington Huntingdonshire. STAC 5/K4/12
- STAC 5/K4/12 - A Rn Rr I D - 38 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Robert Kerchivalls v Robert Manchester, Thomas Thorowgood et al
- see also STAC Kirchivalls
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
Skeggs v Henson
- In re land in the manor of Brampton in co Huntington. STAC 5/S1/8
- STAC 5/S48/4 - B - 16 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Edward Skeggs v Thomas Henson
- STAC 5/S35/21 - B A - 16 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Edward Skeggs v Thomas Henson
- STAC 5/S1/8 - I D - 16 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - Edward Skegges v Thomas Heuson or Henson
- see also STAC Skeggs
T
UV
W
XYZ
Attorney General
AG v Grave
- Sir John Spencer knight Alderman of the City of London. In re enclosed land in Allconbury co Huntingdon - STAC 5/A39/39
- STAC 5/A39/39 - B A C I D - 44 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - AG v Richard Grace, Robert Cawthorne, William Tilley et al
- STAC 5/A53/12 - Rn - 44 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - AG v Richard Grace
- STAC 5/A26/4 - I D - 43 Eliz - Huntingdonshire - AG v Richard Grace, Robert Cawthorne, John Hodson et al
- see also STAC Grace
