Difference between revisions of "STAC co Hampshire"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''' Hampshire '''  
 
''' Hampshire '''  
  
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.  
+
*Ayles v Ward
 +
*Bardolphe v Bardolph and ap Rice
 +
*Blake v Richards
 +
*Campion v Chamberlain
 +
*Cheyney v Den
 +
*Clarke v Lottisham
 +
*Cotton v Bayshe
 +
*Foster v Goddins
 +
*Frome v Frome
 +
*Haywood v Newman and Covert
 +
*Ivemay v Hill and Ogden
 +
*Jackson v South
 +
*Johnson v Knaplock
 +
*Kelleway v St John and Sheffield - Kelleway v Kelleway and Minors
 +
*Kelton v Herrey
 +
*Kemys v Kelleway
 +
*Kenneson v Passion
 +
*King v Whitt
 +
*Kingswell v Cranley
 +
*Knight v Norton
 +
*Litchfield Corporation v Fecknam
 +
*Maryner v Morris
 +
*Marlow v Watts
 +
*Merret v Sedgwick
 +
*Norton v Norton
 +
*Osborne v Pope
 +
*Reade v Edwards
 +
*Ringwood v Bulkley
 +
*Tappe v Stonor
 +
*Waller v Brooke
 +
*Worsam v Habyn
 +
*AG v Cecil - AG v Deane - AG v Hunt
 +
 
 +
''' NOTA BENE ''' - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.  
 +
 
 +
''' A '''
  
 
''' Ayles v Ward '''
 
''' Ayles v Ward '''
 
*A bargain for five quarters of wheat and five quarters of barley. One deposition from Stokes in Hampshire, the other from Fyssheborne in Sussex. STAC 5/A7/28
 
*A bargain for five quarters of wheat and five quarters of barley. One deposition from Stokes in Hampshire, the other from Fyssheborne in Sussex. STAC 5/A7/28
*STAC 5/A23/9 - B A - 15 Eliz - John Ayles v Bernard Hedger, John Ward et al
+
*STAC 5/A23/9 - B A - 15 Eliz - Sussex, Hampshire - John Ayles v Bernard Hedger, John Ward et al
 
*STAC 5/A7/28 - I D - 15 Eliz - Sussex, Hampshire - John Ayles v John Ward, Barnard Hodger
 
*STAC 5/A7/28 - I D - 15 Eliz - Sussex, Hampshire - John Ayles v John Ward, Barnard Hodger
 
*see also [[STAC Ayles]]
 
*see also [[STAC Ayles]]
 +
 +
''' B '''
  
 
''' Bardolphe v Bardolph and ap Rice '''
 
''' Bardolphe v Bardolph and ap Rice '''
Line 19: Line 56:
 
*STAC 7/10/47 - - - Hampshire - John Blake v Edward Richardes, William Camber et al
 
*STAC 7/10/47 - - - Hampshire - John Blake v Edward Richardes, William Camber et al
 
*see also [[STAC Blake]]
 
*see also [[STAC Blake]]
 +
 +
''' C '''
 +
 +
''' Campion v Chamberlain '''   
 +
*Henrye Campyon, Citizen & Mercer of London. Property in Newton Valence, Hants (dk) STAC 5/C78/1
 +
*STAC 5/C78/1 - B - - Hampshire - Henry Campion v Peter Chamberlayne, Nicholas Pestood
 +
*STAC 5/C63/22 - A - 29 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Campion v Peter Chamberlayne et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Campion]]
  
 
''' Cheyney v Den '''
 
''' Cheyney v Den '''
 
*Thomas Cheney of Crewell Hampshire. STAC 5/C3/16
 
*Thomas Cheney of Crewell Hampshire. STAC 5/C3/16
 
*STAC 5/C3/16 - B A - 37 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Cheyney, William Cheney, Richard Bufforde v Thomas Den, William Norrys, Richard Cost, William Tanner et al
 
*STAC 5/C3/16 - B A - 37 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Cheyney, William Cheney, Richard Bufforde v Thomas Den, William Norrys, Richard Cost, William Tanner et al
*STAC 5/C12/38 - I D - 37 Eliz - - Thomas Cheyney, William Cheyney, Richard Bustard v Thomas Denne, William Spycer
+
*STAC 5/C12/38 - I D - 37 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Cheyney, William Cheyney, Richard Bustard v Thomas Denne, William Spycer
*STAC 5/C65/38 - B A - 37 Eliz - - Thomas Cheney v William Spicer, Ingram Jolle, Henry Tolle, Walter Nottes et al
+
*STAC 5/C65/38 - B A - 37 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Cheney v William Spicer, Ingram Jolle, Henry Tolle, Walter Nottes et al
*STAC 5/C34/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - - Thomas Cheyne v William Spicer, Ingram Jolle, Walter Netter et al  
+
*STAC 5/C34/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Cheyne v William Spicer, Ingram Jolle, Walter Netter et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Cheyney]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Cheyney]]  
  
Line 35: Line 80:
 
*STAC 5/C16/14 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clarke v Hugh Lottisham, George Snygge et al  
 
*STAC 5/C16/14 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clarke v Hugh Lottisham, George Snygge et al  
 
*STAC 5/C11/38 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clark v Hugh Lottesham et al  
 
*STAC 5/C11/38 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clark v Hugh Lottesham et al  
*STAC 5/C10/35 - D - 40 Eliz - - William Clerke v Thomas Hodges
+
*STAC 5/C10/35 - D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clerke v Thomas Hodges
*STAC 5/C16/18 - I D - 40 Eliz - William Clarke v John Clothier et al  
+
*STAC 5/C16/18 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clarke v John Clothier et al  
*STAC 5/C16/19 - I D - 40 Eliz - - William Clarke v Richard Mogge, John James et al  
+
*STAC 5/C16/19 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clarke v Richard Mogge, John James et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Clark]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Clark]]  
  
Line 44: Line 89:
 
*STAC 5/C3/11 - B A - 1 Eliz - Hampshire - Jane Cotton v Edward Bayshe, Richard Peters, William Peters, Edward Gayner, David Loyd  
 
*STAC 5/C3/11 - B A - 1 Eliz - Hampshire - Jane Cotton v Edward Bayshe, Richard Peters, William Peters, Edward Gayner, David Loyd  
 
*see also [[STAC Cotton]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Cotton]]  
*
+
 
 
''' D '''  
 
''' D '''  
*
+
 
 
''' E '''
 
''' E '''
*
+
 
 +
''' F '''
 +
 
 
''' Foster v Goddins '''
 
''' Foster v Goddins '''
*STAC 5/F11/25 - Andrew Foster of Lym or Hurseley co Suth’ gent. In re land in Hurseley.
+
*Andrew Foster of Lym or Hurseley co Suth’ gent. In re land in Hurseley. STAC 5/F11/25
 
*STAC 5/F11/25 - B A - 12 Eliz - Hampshire - Andrew Foster v Richard Goddins, Thomas Wilton et al  
 
*STAC 5/F11/25 - B A - 12 Eliz - Hampshire - Andrew Foster v Richard Goddins, Thomas Wilton et al  
 
*STAC 5/F24/40 - I D - 14 Eliz - Hampshire - Andrew Forster v Richard Goddins, Thomas Wilton  
 
*STAC 5/F24/40 - I D - 14 Eliz - Hampshire - Andrew Forster v Richard Goddins, Thomas Wilton  
Line 62: Line 109:
 
*STAC 5/F10/4 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 27 Eliz - Hampshire - Mary Frome v John Honnywell, Edward Frome et al
 
*STAC 5/F10/4 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 27 Eliz - Hampshire - Mary Frome v John Honnywell, Edward Frome et al
 
*see also [[STAC Frome]]
 
*see also [[STAC Frome]]
*
+
 
 
''' G '''  
 
''' G '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' H '''
 +
 
 
''' Haywood v Newman and Covert '''
 
''' Haywood v Newman and Covert '''
* [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/a2a/records.aspx?cat=176-lm_1&cid=2-1-9-29#2-1-9-29 Memorandum in a Star Chamber case of Walter Haywarde v. John Newman and others, concerning a forged lease of Bearlands, Headley, Hants, recording that the lease is to be brought to court  Surrey History Centre LM/1162  13 Oct 1591]
+
*Memorandum in a Star Chamber case of Walter Haywarde v. John Newman and others, concerning a forged lease of Bearlands, Headley, Hants, recording that the lease is to be brought to court  Surrey History Centre LM/1162  13 Oct 1591 [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/a2a/records.aspx?cat=176-lm_1&cid=2-1-9-29#2-1-9-29]  
 
*STAC 5/H15/36 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Hayward v Thomas Covert, Stephen Grey et al
 
*STAC 5/H15/36 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Hayward v Thomas Covert, Stephen Grey et al
 
*STAC 5/H63/29 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haward v John Newman, Thomas Covert et al
 
*STAC 5/H63/29 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haward v John Newman, Thomas Covert et al
Line 75: Line 124:
 
*STAC 7/23/30 - - - Hampshire - Walter Heyward v Thomas Coverte et al
 
*STAC 7/23/30 - - - Hampshire - Walter Heyward v Thomas Coverte et al
 
*see also [[STAC Hayward]]
 
*see also [[STAC Hayward]]
 +
 +
''' I J '''
  
 
''' Ivemay v Hill and Ogden '''
 
''' Ivemay v Hill and Ogden '''
Line 96: Line 147:
 
*STAC 7/13/8 - - - Hampshire - Juliana Johnson v Nicholas Caplyn, Robert Knaplocke, John Wakelande et al
 
*STAC 7/13/8 - - - Hampshire - Juliana Johnson v Nicholas Caplyn, Robert Knaplocke, John Wakelande et al
 
*see also [[STAC Johnson]]
 
*see also [[STAC Johnson]]
 +
 +
''' K '''
  
 
''' Kelleway v St John and Sheffield '''
 
''' Kelleway v St John and Sheffield '''
 
*Estate of Lady Wenefred Late Marchioness of Winchester. STAC 5/K2/3  
 
*Estate of Lady Wenefred Late Marchioness of Winchester. STAC 5/K2/3  
 
*STAC 5/K2/3 - B A - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kellway v William St John, Richard Sherfield
 
*STAC 5/K2/3 - B A - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kellway v William St John, Richard Sherfield
*STAC 5/K14/5 - B A C - 31 Eliz - Thomas Kelwaye v William St John, Richard Sheffeild
+
*STAC 5/K14/5 - B A C - 31 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kelwaye v William St John, Richard Sheffeild
*STAC 5/K7/35 - I D - 30 Eliz - Thomas Kelway v Richard Sheffild
+
*STAC 5/K7/35 - I D - 30 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kelway v Richard Sheffild
 
*see also  [[STAC Keilway]]
 
*see also  [[STAC Keilway]]
  
Line 107: Line 160:
 
*Manor of Rockbourne Rockstead, Hampshire. STAC 5/K2/7  
 
*Manor of Rockbourne Rockstead, Hampshire. STAC 5/K2/7  
 
*STAC 5/K2/7 - B A Dr - 26 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kellewaye v Francis Kellewaye, John Minors, James Proctor
 
*STAC 5/K2/7 - B A Dr - 26 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kellewaye v Francis Kellewaye, John Minors, James Proctor
*STAC 5/K3/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - Thomas Kelleway v Francis Kelleway
+
*STAC 5/K3/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kelleway v Francis Kelleway
*STAC 5/K6/7 - B A - 26 Eliz - Thomas Kelleway v Francis Kelleway, John Mynors et al
+
*STAC 5/K6/7 - B A - 26 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kelleway v Francis Kelleway, John Mynors et al
*STAC 5/K8/23 - I - 24 Eliz - Thomas Kelwaye v John Myner et al
+
*STAC 5/K8/23 - I - 24 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kelwaye v John Myner et al
*STAC 5/K5/14 - D - 26 Eliz - Thomas Kellewaie v John Myners
+
*STAC 5/K5/14 - D - 26 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kellewaie v John Myners
 
*see also [[STAC Keilway]] see also [[STAC Kelleway]]
 
*see also [[STAC Keilway]] see also [[STAC Kelleway]]
  
 
''' Kelton v Herrey '''
 
''' Kelton v Herrey '''
 
*Property in Andover Co Southampton. STAC 5/K8/19
 
*Property in Andover Co Southampton. STAC 5/K8/19
*STAC 5/K5/35 - I D - 17 Eliz - Arthur Kelton v John Herrye
+
*STAC 5/K5/35 - I D - 17 Eliz - Hampshire - Arthur Kelton v John Herrye
 
*STAC 5/K8/19 - B A - 17 Eliz - Hampshire - Arthur Kelton v John Herrye et uxor
 
*STAC 5/K8/19 - B A - 17 Eliz - Hampshire - Arthur Kelton v John Herrye et uxor
 
*see also [[STAC Kelton]]
 
*see also [[STAC Kelton]]
Line 137: Line 190:
 
*Richard Kingswell of Lysse Hampshire. STAC 5/K4/29  
 
*Richard Kingswell of Lysse Hampshire. STAC 5/K4/29  
 
*Richard Kingswell of Lysse [Liss] Hampshire, Richard Cranlye also of Lysse. STAC 5/K4/37
 
*Richard Kingswell of Lysse [Liss] Hampshire, Richard Cranlye also of Lysse. STAC 5/K4/37
*STAC 5/K7/28 - I D - 39 Eliz - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranley
+
*STAC 5/K7/28 - I D - 39 Eliz - Hampshire - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranley
*STAC 5/K8/31 - B A - 39 Eliz - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranley
+
*STAC 5/K8/31 - B A - 39 Eliz - Hampshire - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranley
 
*STAC 5/K4/29 - B - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranley et uxor, Henry Dearing et al
 
*STAC 5/K4/29 - B - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranley et uxor, Henry Dearing et al
 
*STAC 5/K4/37 - B - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranlye, Henry Dearinge et al
 
*STAC 5/K4/37 - B - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranlye, Henry Dearinge et al
Line 145: Line 198:
 
''' Knight v Norton '''
 
''' Knight v Norton '''
 
*In re property in Farringdon Hampshire. STAC 5/K4/8  
 
*In re property in Farringdon Hampshire. STAC 5/K4/8  
*STAC 5/K7/26 - B A C I D - 32 Eliz - John Knight v Robert Rorton, Elizabeth Knight et al
+
*STAC 5/K7/26 - B A C I D - 32 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Robert Rorton, Elizabeth Knight et al
*STAC 5/K14/2 - I D - 31 Eliz - John Knight v Elizabeth Knight, Robert Norton et al
+
*STAC 5/K14/2 - I D - 31 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Elizabeth Knight, Robert Norton et al
*STAC 5/K3/38 - B A - 33 Eliz - John Knight v Robert Norton et al
+
*STAC 5/K3/38 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Robert Norton et al
*STAC 5/K6/12 - I D - 34 Eliz - John Knight v Robert Norton, Edmund Norton et al
+
*STAC 5/K6/12 - I D - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Robert Norton, Edmund Norton et al
*STAC 5/K11/24 - Rn - 34 Eliz - John Knight v Richard Norton, Andrew Buldolf, Peter Wynslade
+
*STAC 5/K11/24 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Richard Norton, Andrew Buldolf, Peter Wynslade
*STAC 5/K10/16 - I D - 32 Eliz - John Knight v William Knight et al
+
*STAC 5/K10/16 - I D - 32 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v William Knight et al
 
*STAC 5/K4/8 - I D - 38 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Sir Richard Norton
 
*STAC 5/K4/8 - I D - 38 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Sir Richard Norton
 
*see also [[STAC Knight]]
 
*see also [[STAC Knight]]
 +
 +
''' L '''
  
 
''' Litchfield Corporation v Fecknam '''  
 
''' Litchfield Corporation v Fecknam '''  
Line 158: Line 213:
 
*STAC 7/25/23 - - - Hampshire - inhabitants of Lichfield v  
 
*STAC 7/25/23 - - - Hampshire - inhabitants of Lichfield v  
 
*see also [[STAC Litchfield]]
 
*see also [[STAC Litchfield]]
 +
 +
''' M '''
  
 
''' Maryner v Morris '''
 
''' Maryner v Morris '''
Line 173: Line 230:
 
''' Marlow v Watts '''
 
''' Marlow v Watts '''
 
*Interrogatories to be ministered on behalf of William Marlow, William Payce and Alice his wife Complts unto Nicholas Watts deft. Land in Mattingley in the parish of Heckfeld co South. Deposition: Nicholas Watts of Yateld co South yeoman. STAC 5/M1/15
 
*Interrogatories to be ministered on behalf of William Marlow, William Payce and Alice his wife Complts unto Nicholas Watts deft. Land in Mattingley in the parish of Heckfeld co South. Deposition: Nicholas Watts of Yateld co South yeoman. STAC 5/M1/15
*STAC 5/M4/28 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - William Marlo, William Pays et uxor v Elenor Demster, Nicholas Watts, Henry Sone
+
*STAC 5/M4/28 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - Hampshire - William Marlo, William Pays et uxor v Elenor Demster, Nicholas Watts, Henry Sone
*STAC 5/M27/36 - I D - 26 Eliz - William Marlo et al v Nicholas Watts et al
+
*STAC 5/M27/36 - I D - 26 Eliz - Hampshire - William Marlo et al v Nicholas Watts et al
 
*STAC 5/M1/15 - I D - 24 Eliz - Hampshire - William Marlow, William Paie et Alice uxor v Nicholas Watts
 
*STAC 5/M1/15 - I D - 24 Eliz - Hampshire - William Marlow, William Paie et Alice uxor v Nicholas Watts
*STAC 5/M57/25 - D - 24 Eliz - William Marlowe v Eleanor Denyster
+
*STAC 5/M57/25 - D - 24 Eliz - Hampshire - William Marlowe v Eleanor Denyster
 
*see also [[STAC Marlow]]
 
*see also [[STAC Marlow]]
  
Line 182: Line 239:
 
*Bill of John Merrett of Southampton Grocer. A large bundle of documents of above average legibility. STAC 5/M1/24
 
*Bill of John Merrett of Southampton Grocer. A large bundle of documents of above average legibility. STAC 5/M1/24
 
*STAC 5/M1/24 - B A I D - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Hampshire - John Merret et Elizabeth uxor v John Sedgwick, Thomas Wadlowe, John Crooke
 
*STAC 5/M1/24 - B A I D - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Hampshire - John Merret et Elizabeth uxor v John Sedgwick, Thomas Wadlowe, John Crooke
*STAC 5/M48/18 - I D - 31 Eliz - Elizabeth Meryet, John Meryet v John Crooke Sr et al
+
*STAC 5/M48/18 - I D - 31 Eliz - Hampshire - Elizabeth Meryet, John Meryet v John Crooke Sr et al
*STAC 5/M32/19 - I D - 31 Eliz - Elizabeth Moryett, John Moryett v John Sedgwyck, Thomas Wadlowe
+
*STAC 5/M32/19 - I D - 31 Eliz - Hampshire - Elizabeth Moryett, John Moryett v John Sedgwyck, Thomas Wadlowe
*STAC 5/M6/27 - I D - 30 Eliz - John Meryet, et uxor v Thomas Wadlowe
+
*STAC 5/M6/27 - I D - 30 Eliz - Hampshire - John Meryet, et uxor v Thomas Wadlowe
*STAC 5/M34/7 - I D - 32 Eliz - John Merit, Elizabeth Merit v John Sedgwyck
+
*STAC 5/M34/7 - I D - 32 Eliz - Hampshire - John Merit, Elizabeth Merit v John Sedgwyck
 
*see also [[STAC Merret]]
 
*see also [[STAC Merret]]
 +
 +
''' N '''
  
 
''' Norton v Norton '''
 
''' Norton v Norton '''
 
*Deposition dated 5 Feb Anno 40 Eliz. John Fylder of the parish of Rotherwick co South’ yeoman aged 43. Richard Norton is possibly a constable. STAC 5/N4/2
 
*Deposition dated 5 Feb Anno 40 Eliz. John Fylder of the parish of Rotherwick co South’ yeoman aged 43. Richard Norton is possibly a constable. STAC 5/N4/2
*STAC 5/N16/40 - Rn - 39 Eliz - William Norton, Charles Norton, Daniel Norton v Richard Norton, Peter Bettesworth et al
+
*STAC 5/N16/40 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Hampshire - William Norton, Charles Norton, Daniel Norton v Richard Norton, Peter Bettesworth et al
*STAC 5/N12/9 - I D - 39 Eliz - William Norton, Danyell Norton v Richard Norton, Roger Gregorye
+
*STAC 5/N12/9 - I D - 39 Eliz - Hampshire - William Norton, Danyell Norton v Richard Norton, Roger Gregorye
*STAC 5/N12/29 - I D - 39 Eliz - William Norton, Daniel Norton v Richard Norton et al
+
*STAC 5/N12/29 - I D - 39 Eliz - Hampshire - William Norton, Daniel Norton v Richard Norton et al
 
*STAC 5/N4/2 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Norton v Richard Norton
 
*STAC 5/N4/2 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Norton v Richard Norton
*STAC 5/N4/33 - I D - 40 Eliz - William Norton v Richard Norton et al
+
*STAC 5/N4/33 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Norton v Richard Norton et al
 +
 
 +
''' O '''
  
 
''' Osborne v Pope '''
 
''' Osborne v Pope '''
 
*Bill (damaged): William Osborne of Fordingbridge, Hants v Andrewe Pope, John Shepparde, Thomas Metyearde, Nicholas Morden & William Pope. Lease of lands of Hospital of St John Baptist in Fordingbridge from the House & Hospital of ... ...osses by Winchester, Hants, to John Osborne, father of the complt. STAC 5/O3/3. (dk)
 
*Bill (damaged): William Osborne of Fordingbridge, Hants v Andrewe Pope, John Shepparde, Thomas Metyearde, Nicholas Morden & William Pope. Lease of lands of Hospital of St John Baptist in Fordingbridge from the House & Hospital of ... ...osses by Winchester, Hants, to John Osborne, father of the complt. STAC 5/O3/3. (dk)
*STAC 5/O5/26 - B A C - 34 Eliz - William Osborne v John Sheppard, William Pope, Nicholas Morden et al.
+
*STAC 5/O5/26 - B A C - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v John Sheppard, William Pope, Nicholas Morden et al.
*STAC 5/O2/5 - I D - 35 Eliz - William Osborne v Andrew Pope et al..
+
*STAC 5/O2/5 - I D - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v Andrew Pope et al..
 
*STAC 5/O3/3 - B C I D - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v Andrew Pope, William Pope, Nicholas Morden et al.
 
*STAC 5/O3/3 - B C I D - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v Andrew Pope, William Pope, Nicholas Morden et al.
*STAC 5/O4/1 - Rn - 34 Eliz - William Osborne v Andrew Pope, John Sheppard et al.
+
*STAC 5/O4/1 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v Andrew Pope, John Sheppard et al.
*STAC 5/O6/7 - A - 34 Eliz - William Osborne v Andrew Pope, Nicholas Morden, Thomas Meetyard.
+
*STAC 5/O6/7 - A - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v Andrew Pope, Nicholas Morden, Thomas Meetyard.
*STAC 5/O7/3 - I D - 34 Eliz - William Osborne v Thomas Mctyeare, Andrew Pope et al.
+
*STAC 5/O7/3 - I D - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v Thomas Mctyeare, Andrew Pope et al.
 
*see also [[STAC Osborne]]
 
*see also [[STAC Osborne]]
*
+
 
 
''' P '''  
 
''' P '''  
*
+
 
 
''' Q '''  
 
''' Q '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' R '''
 +
 
 
''' Reade v Edwards '''  
 
''' Reade v Edwards '''  
 
*In re a parcell of land called Coneygarth in Peterfield co South’ STAC 5/R1/4  
 
*In re a parcell of land called Coneygarth in Peterfield co South’ STAC 5/R1/4  
*STAC 5/R33/33 - B A Rn - 44 Eliz - Thomas Reade v Edmund Marvyn, Charles Edwards et al
+
*STAC 5/R33/33 - B A Rn - 44 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Reade v Edmund Marvyn, Charles Edwards et al
 
*STAC 5/R1/4 - I D - 44 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Read v Charles Edwards, Thomas Shorter  
 
*STAC 5/R1/4 - I D - 44 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Read v Charles Edwards, Thomas Shorter  
 
*see also [[STAC Read]]
 
*see also [[STAC Read]]
Line 218: Line 281:
 
''' Ringwood v Bulkley '''  
 
''' Ringwood v Bulkley '''  
 
*Bill of Complaint of Henry Ryngwood of Crydlesowe in co Sowth’ esquire. John Bulkley of Burgate in co Sowth’ esquire, William Osborn and Thomas Charnell brought cases against him in other courts. STAC 5/R1/11
 
*Bill of Complaint of Henry Ryngwood of Crydlesowe in co Sowth’ esquire. John Bulkley of Burgate in co Sowth’ esquire, William Osborn and Thomas Charnell brought cases against him in other courts. STAC 5/R1/11
*STAC 5/R43/7 - Rn - - Henry Ringwoode v John Bunckley
+
*STAC 5/R43/7 - Rn - - Hampshire - Henry Ringwoode v John Bunckley
*STAC 5/R23/26 - I D - 34 Eliz - Henry Ringwood v William Hill, William North
+
*STAC 5/R23/26 - I D - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v William Hill, William North
*STAC 5/R40/16 - B A Dr - 34 Eliz - Henry Ringewood v Thomas Barnes, Francis Bulkeley et al
+
*STAC 5/R40/16 - B A Dr - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringewood v Thomas Barnes, Francis Bulkeley et al
*STAC 5/R31/24 - C I D - 35 Eliz - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkley et al
+
*STAC 5/R31/24 - C I D - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkley et al
*STAC 5/R24/22 - I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkley, Edward WIlloughby et al
+
*STAC 5/R24/22 - I D - 36 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkley, Edward WIlloughby et al
*STAC 5/R15/11 - Rr - 35 Eliz - Henry Ringewood v John Bulkeley, Thomas Charnell
+
*STAC 5/R15/11 - Rr - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringewood v John Bulkeley, Thomas Charnell
*STAC 5/R2/16 - B A - 37 Eliz - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkeley
+
*STAC 5/R2/16 - B A - 37 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkeley
*STAC 5/R4/36 - I D - 34 Eliz - Henry Ringewoode v Thomas Charnells, Thomas Barnes et al
+
*STAC 5/R4/36 - I D - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringewoode v Thomas Charnells, Thomas Barnes et al
*STAC 5/R3/13 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Henry Rynwood v John Bulkely et al
+
*STAC 5/R3/13 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Rynwood v John Bulkely et al
 
*STAC 5/R1/11 - B - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkely, William Osborn, Thomas Chawell, Ambrose Ringwood  
 
*STAC 5/R1/11 - B - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkely, William Osborn, Thomas Chawell, Ambrose Ringwood  
*STAC 5/R5/37 - I D - 30 Eliz - Henry Ringwood v Francis Bulkeley
+
*STAC 5/R5/37 - I D - 30 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v Francis Bulkeley
 
*see also [[STAC Ringwood]]
 
*see also [[STAC Ringwood]]
*
+
 
 
''' S '''  
 
''' S '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' T '''
 +
 
 
''' Tappe v Stonor '''
 
''' Tappe v Stonor '''
 
*TNA Note: Perjury in a Chancery suit as to the manor of Pennington. STAC 7/6/4  
 
*TNA Note: Perjury in a Chancery suit as to the manor of Pennington. STAC 7/6/4  
*STAC 5/T20/26 - I D - 30 Eliz - John Tappe, Dorothy Tappe v Francis Stoner
+
*STAC 5/T20/26 - I D - 30 Eliz - Hampshire - John Tappe, Dorothy Tappe v Francis Stoner
*STAC 5/T29/20 - I D - 30 Eliz - John Tappe, Dorothy Tappe v Thomas Lymmyng
+
*STAC 5/T29/20 - I D - 30 Eliz - Hampshire - John Tappe, Dorothy Tappe v Thomas Lymmyng
*STAC 5/T25/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - Dorothy Tapp, John Tapp v Francis Stonor et al
+
*STAC 5/T25/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Dorothy Tapp, John Tapp v Francis Stonor et al
 
*STAC 7/6/4 - - - Hampshire - John Tappe et Dorothy uxor v Francis Stonar, Thomas Lyminge
 
*STAC 7/6/4 - - - Hampshire - John Tappe et Dorothy uxor v Francis Stonar, Thomas Lyminge
 
*see also [[STAC Tappe]]
 
*see also [[STAC Tappe]]
*
+
 
 
''' UV '''
 
''' UV '''
*
+
 
 +
''' W '''
 +
 
 
''' Waller v Brooke '''
 
''' Waller v Brooke '''
 
*William Waller of Old Stoke Charity co South. In re the vicaredge house of Sopley co South. STAC 5/W3/18
 
*William Waller of Old Stoke Charity co South. In re the vicaredge house of Sopley co South. STAC 5/W3/18
 
*STAC 5/W3/18 - B A - Easter 36 Eliz - Hampshire - William Waller v Ann Brooke, Philemon Brooke, Arthur Brooke
 
*STAC 5/W3/18 - B A - Easter 36 Eliz - Hampshire - William Waller v Ann Brooke, Philemon Brooke, Arthur Brooke
*STAC 5/W37/30 - I D - 36 Eliz - William Waller v Anne Brooke et al
+
*STAC 5/W37/30 - I D - 36 Eliz - Hampshire - William Waller v Anne Brooke et al
 
*see also [[STAC Waller]]
 
*see also [[STAC Waller]]
  
Line 252: Line 319:
 
*Bill of Thomas Worsam of Lassam on co South yeoman, had a messuage and forty acres of land in Benstead co South. Wm Habyn of Benstead husbandman. Depositions taken at Winchester. STAC 5/W3/1
 
*Bill of Thomas Worsam of Lassam on co South yeoman, had a messuage and forty acres of land in Benstead co South. Wm Habyn of Benstead husbandman. Depositions taken at Winchester. STAC 5/W3/1
 
*STAC 5/W3/1 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Worsam v William Habyn et Elizabeth uxor, Susan Edsell
 
*STAC 5/W3/1 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Worsam v William Habyn et Elizabeth uxor, Susan Edsell
*STAC 5/W58/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - Thomas Worsham v William Habyne et al
+
*STAC 5/W58/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Worsham v William Habyne et al
*STAC 5/W60/33 - I D - 44 Eliz - Thomas Worsam v Elizabeth Habin, William Habin, Suzan Edsoll
+
*STAC 5/W60/33 - I D - 44 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Worsam v Elizabeth Habin, William Habin, Suzan Edsoll
 
*see also [[STAC Worsam]]
 
*see also [[STAC Worsam]]
*
+
 
 
''' XYZ '''  
 
''' XYZ '''  
*
+
 
 
''' Attorney General '''  
 
''' Attorney General '''  
  

Revision as of 17:03, 16 October 2016

Hampshire

  • Ayles v Ward
  • Bardolphe v Bardolph and ap Rice
  • Blake v Richards
  • Campion v Chamberlain
  • Cheyney v Den
  • Clarke v Lottisham
  • Cotton v Bayshe
  • Foster v Goddins
  • Frome v Frome
  • Haywood v Newman and Covert
  • Ivemay v Hill and Ogden
  • Jackson v South
  • Johnson v Knaplock
  • Kelleway v St John and Sheffield - Kelleway v Kelleway and Minors
  • Kelton v Herrey
  • Kemys v Kelleway
  • Kenneson v Passion
  • King v Whitt
  • Kingswell v Cranley
  • Knight v Norton
  • Litchfield Corporation v Fecknam
  • Maryner v Morris
  • Marlow v Watts
  • Merret v Sedgwick
  • Norton v Norton
  • Osborne v Pope
  • Reade v Edwards
  • Ringwood v Bulkley
  • Tappe v Stonor
  • Waller v Brooke
  • Worsam v Habyn
  • AG v Cecil - AG v Deane - AG v Hunt

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

A

Ayles v Ward

  • A bargain for five quarters of wheat and five quarters of barley. One deposition from Stokes in Hampshire, the other from Fyssheborne in Sussex. STAC 5/A7/28
  • STAC 5/A23/9 - B A - 15 Eliz - Sussex, Hampshire - John Ayles v Bernard Hedger, John Ward et al
  • STAC 5/A7/28 - I D - 15 Eliz - Sussex, Hampshire - John Ayles v John Ward, Barnard Hodger
  • see also STAC Ayles

B

Bardolphe v Bardolph and ap Rice

  • ODNB Puttenham, George (1529–1590/91), writer and literary critic by Steven W. May (see also George Puttenham's lewd and illicit career.(Biography) by Steven May, which relates B31/14 to Shaldon, Hants
  • STAC 5/B31/14 - B A - 8 Eliz - Hampshire - John Bardolphe v George Puttenham, Sir Richard ap Rice et al
  • STAC 5/B44/16 - I D - 9 Eliz - Hampshire - John Bardolph clericus v Richard Ap Rice clericus
  • see also STAC Bardolph

Blake v Richards

  • STAC 7/10/47 - TNA Note: Enham: Forcible dispute as to rights of common.
  • STAC 7/10/47 - - - Hampshire - John Blake v Edward Richardes, William Camber et al
  • see also STAC Blake

C

Campion v Chamberlain

  • Henrye Campyon, Citizen & Mercer of London. Property in Newton Valence, Hants (dk) STAC 5/C78/1
  • STAC 5/C78/1 - B - - Hampshire - Henry Campion v Peter Chamberlayne, Nicholas Pestood
  • STAC 5/C63/22 - A - 29 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Campion v Peter Chamberlayne et al
  • see also STAC Campion

Cheyney v Den

  • Thomas Cheney of Crewell Hampshire. STAC 5/C3/16
  • STAC 5/C3/16 - B A - 37 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Cheyney, William Cheney, Richard Bufforde v Thomas Den, William Norrys, Richard Cost, William Tanner et al
  • STAC 5/C12/38 - I D - 37 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Cheyney, William Cheyney, Richard Bustard v Thomas Denne, William Spycer
  • STAC 5/C65/38 - B A - 37 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Cheney v William Spicer, Ingram Jolle, Henry Tolle, Walter Nottes et al
  • STAC 5/C34/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Cheyne v William Spicer, Ingram Jolle, Walter Netter et al
  • see also STAC Cheyney

Clarke v Lottisham

  • TNA Note: Cutting and carrying away corn and hay. STAC 10/2/3
  • STAC 10/2/3 - I - - Hampshire - William Clerk v Hugh Lottisham, Thomas Hedge et al
    • Interrogatories administered on behalf of the plaintiff to Thomas Hedge
  • STAC 5/C5/26 - B A - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clerk v Hugh Lottisham, Oliver Lottisham, John Orchard, Thomas Hedges et al
  • STAC 5/C16/14 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clarke v Hugh Lottisham, George Snygge et al
  • STAC 5/C11/38 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clark v Hugh Lottesham et al
  • STAC 5/C10/35 - D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clerke v Thomas Hodges
  • STAC 5/C16/18 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clarke v John Clothier et al
  • STAC 5/C16/19 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Clarke v Richard Mogge, John James et al
  • see also STAC Clark

Cotton v Bayshe

  • Dame Jane Cotton widow and Richard Bocher late of the forest of Eastbere [East Bere Forest] Hampshire. STAC 5/C3/11
  • STAC 5/C3/11 - B A - 1 Eliz - Hampshire - Jane Cotton v Edward Bayshe, Richard Peters, William Peters, Edward Gayner, David Loyd
  • see also STAC Cotton

D

E

F

Foster v Goddins

  • Andrew Foster of Lym or Hurseley co Suth’ gent. In re land in Hurseley. STAC 5/F11/25
  • STAC 5/F11/25 - B A - 12 Eliz - Hampshire - Andrew Foster v Richard Goddins, Thomas Wilton et al
  • STAC 5/F24/40 - I D - 14 Eliz - Hampshire - Andrew Forster v Richard Goddins, Thomas Wilton
  • see also STAC Foster Forster

Frome v Frome

  • See also REQ 1/19 f.114/REQ 1/19 f.115 which notes that this has also been pursued in the Manor Court of Highcleere, Chancery, Common Pleas & Court of Requests
  • STAC 5/F11/8 - I - 24 Eliz - Hampshire - Mary Frome v Edward Frome et al
  • STAC 5/F8/8 - I D - 26 Eliz - Hampshire - Mary Frome v Edward Frome, John Honywell et al
  • STAC 5/F14/36 - I D - 27 Eliz - Hampshire - Mary Frome v Edmund Frome et al
  • STAC 5/F10/4 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 27 Eliz - Hampshire - Mary Frome v John Honnywell, Edward Frome et al
  • see also STAC Frome

G

H

Haywood v Newman and Covert

  • Memorandum in a Star Chamber case of Walter Haywarde v. John Newman and others, concerning a forged lease of Bearlands, Headley, Hants, recording that the lease is to be brought to court Surrey History Centre LM/1162 13 Oct 1591 [1]
  • STAC 5/H15/36 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Hayward v Thomas Covert, Stephen Grey et al
  • STAC 5/H63/29 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haward v John Newman, Thomas Covert et al
  • STAC 5/H58/20 - I D - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haywood v Thomas Covert, Thomas Newman et al
  • STAC 5/H62/15 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Heywarde v Thomas Coverte, Robert Newman
  • STAC 5/H28/28 - I D - 36 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haward v John Newman et al
  • STAC 5/H31/39 - I D - 36 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haward v John Neweman, Thomas Coverte
  • STAC 7/23/30 - - - Hampshire - Walter Heyward v Thomas Coverte et al
  • see also STAC Hayward

I J

Ivemay v Hill and Ogden

  • William Ivemay of Goreley in co of Southh. and Edith his wife on befalf of Henry Duling an Idiat and an naturall foole which said Edith is natural sister. STAC 5/J21/35
  • Int Whether did you know . . . Henry Dulynge son of one Henry Dewlinge late of South Goreley in the County of Southampton, hubandman deceased. STAC 5/J3/2
  • STAC 5/J21/35 - B A Rn Rr - 11 Eliz - Hampshire - Edith Ivemay, William Ivemay v Richard Hill, Philip Ogden et al
  • STAC 5/J3/2 - I D - 11 Eliz - Hampshire - William Ivemay et uxor v Philip Ogden, Richard Bushop, Richard Hill, Richard Smart
  • see also STAC Ivemay

Jackson v South

  • STAC 5/J4/14 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - Richard Jackson v Thomas Southe
  • see also STAC Jackson

Johnson v Knaplock

  • TNA Note: Southampton: Seizure of goods on a claim for petty custom. STAC 7/13/8
  • STAC 5/J7/4 - B A - 20 Eliz - Hampshire - Julian Johnson v Robert Knaplocke, James Redinge et al
  • STAC 5/J18/19 - I D - 21 Eliz - Hampshire - Julian Johnson v Robert Knapleck, James Reading et al
  • STAC 5/J8/33 - C I D - 22 Eliz - Hampshire - Julian Johnson v Robert Knaplocke et al
  • STAC 5/J5/2 - I D - 22 Eliz - Hampshire - Julian Johnson v Robert Knaplocke et al
  • STAC 5/J5/39 - Rn - 29 Eliz - Hampshire - Julian Johnson v Robert Knaplocke, James Reading et al
  • STAC 7/13/8 - - - Hampshire - Juliana Johnson v Nicholas Caplyn, Robert Knaplocke, John Wakelande et al
  • see also STAC Johnson

K

Kelleway v St John and Sheffield

  • Estate of Lady Wenefred Late Marchioness of Winchester. STAC 5/K2/3
  • STAC 5/K2/3 - B A - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kellway v William St John, Richard Sherfield
  • STAC 5/K14/5 - B A C - 31 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kelwaye v William St John, Richard Sheffeild
  • STAC 5/K7/35 - I D - 30 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kelway v Richard Sheffild
  • see also STAC Keilway

Kelleway v Kelleway and Minors

  • Manor of Rockbourne Rockstead, Hampshire. STAC 5/K2/7
  • STAC 5/K2/7 - B A Dr - 26 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kellewaye v Francis Kellewaye, John Minors, James Proctor
  • STAC 5/K3/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kelleway v Francis Kelleway
  • STAC 5/K6/7 - B A - 26 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kelleway v Francis Kelleway, John Mynors et al
  • STAC 5/K8/23 - I - 24 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kelwaye v John Myner et al
  • STAC 5/K5/14 - D - 26 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Kellewaie v John Myners
  • see also STAC Keilway see also STAC Kelleway

Kelton v Herrey

  • Property in Andover Co Southampton. STAC 5/K8/19
  • STAC 5/K5/35 - I D - 17 Eliz - Hampshire - Arthur Kelton v John Herrye
  • STAC 5/K8/19 - B A - 17 Eliz - Hampshire - Arthur Kelton v John Herrye et uxor
  • see also STAC Kelton

Kemys v Kelleway

  • TNA Notes: Lymington: Illegal arrest. STAC 7/3/23
  • STAC 7/3/23 - - - Hampshire - Lawrence Keymys, Thomas Alye, Thomas Pithowse et al v Francis Keyllwey, George Thorpe, William Hollis, Sir William Keyllwey et al
  • see also STAC Kemys

Kenneson v Passion

  • William Kennesson of [blank] in the co of Southt' [Hampshire] husbandman. Inheritance and custody of an heir. STAC 5/K2/15
  • STAC 5/K2/15 - B C A - 39 Eliz - Hampshire - William Kennesson v William Passion, William Snellgar, Thomas Dale
  • see also STAC Kenneson

King, v Whitt

  • TNA Notes: Subornation of perjury concerning a forcible entry and assault. STAC 7/3/25
  • STAC 7/3/25 - - - Hampshire - John King v John Whitt, John Sharpwell et al
  • see also STAC King

Kingswell v Cranley

  • Richard Kingswell of Lysse Hampshire. STAC 5/K4/29
  • Richard Kingswell of Lysse [Liss] Hampshire, Richard Cranlye also of Lysse. STAC 5/K4/37
  • STAC 5/K7/28 - I D - 39 Eliz - Hampshire - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranley
  • STAC 5/K8/31 - B A - 39 Eliz - Hampshire - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranley
  • STAC 5/K4/29 - B - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranley et uxor, Henry Dearing et al
  • STAC 5/K4/37 - B - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - Richard Kingswell v Richard Cranlye, Henry Dearinge et al
  • see also STAC Kingswell

Knight v Norton

  • In re property in Farringdon Hampshire. STAC 5/K4/8
  • STAC 5/K7/26 - B A C I D - 32 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Robert Rorton, Elizabeth Knight et al
  • STAC 5/K14/2 - I D - 31 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Elizabeth Knight, Robert Norton et al
  • STAC 5/K3/38 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Robert Norton et al
  • STAC 5/K6/12 - I D - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Robert Norton, Edmund Norton et al
  • STAC 5/K11/24 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Richard Norton, Andrew Buldolf, Peter Wynslade
  • STAC 5/K10/16 - I D - 32 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v William Knight et al
  • STAC 5/K4/8 - I D - 38 Eliz - Hampshire - John Knight v Sir Richard Norton
  • see also STAC Knight

L

Litchfield Corporation v Fecknam

  • STAC 5/L8/33 - B - - Hampshire - The Bailiff and Citizens of Litchfield v John Fecknam alias Fowke alias Wheeler, William Mylner alias Harrison et al
  • STAC 7/25/23 - - - Hampshire - inhabitants of Lichfield v
  • see also STAC Litchfield

M

Maryner v Morris

  • TNA Note: Sherfield-uppon-Lodden: Forcible entry, damage and seizure of goods on the manor. STAC 7/14/1
  • Your daily orator Margarete Marryner widow. That whereas your said orator hath for the space of almost sixteen years peaceably and quietly dwelt and inhabited within her house or tenement within Sherfelde co Southampton. STAC 5/M1/34
  • STAC 5/M17/19 - B A - 13 Eliz - Hampshire - Margaret Marynor v Jerome Wakefield, Francis Morrys et al
  • STAC 5/M16/6 - I D - 13 Eliz - Hampshire - Margaret Marryner v Jherom Wakefield, Edmund Morrys et al
  • STAC 5/M58/21 - A - - Hampshire - Margaret Maryner v Allen Eglonby
  • STAC 5/M59/35 - A - - Hampshire - Margaret Maryner v Francis Morris William Andrewes et al
  • STAC 5/M34/40 - I D - 13 Eliz - Hampshire - Margaret Maryner v Thomas Moore, Francis Norres
  • STAC 5/M1/34 - B - 13 Eliz - Hampshire - Margaret Marryner v Francis Morris, Edmund Morris, Jerom Wakefield, John Digweede, Thomas Digweede, William Andrews, John Robinson et al
  • STAC 7/14/1 - - - Hampshire - Margaret Marryner v Edmund Morrys, Jerome Wakefelde, Allan Eglonbye, John Digweede
  • see also STAC Maryner

Marlow v Watts

  • Interrogatories to be ministered on behalf of William Marlow, William Payce and Alice his wife Complts unto Nicholas Watts deft. Land in Mattingley in the parish of Heckfeld co South. Deposition: Nicholas Watts of Yateld co South yeoman. STAC 5/M1/15
  • STAC 5/M4/28 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - Hampshire - William Marlo, William Pays et uxor v Elenor Demster, Nicholas Watts, Henry Sone
  • STAC 5/M27/36 - I D - 26 Eliz - Hampshire - William Marlo et al v Nicholas Watts et al
  • STAC 5/M1/15 - I D - 24 Eliz - Hampshire - William Marlow, William Paie et Alice uxor v Nicholas Watts
  • STAC 5/M57/25 - D - 24 Eliz - Hampshire - William Marlowe v Eleanor Denyster
  • see also STAC Marlow

Merret v Sedgwick

  • Bill of John Merrett of Southampton Grocer. A large bundle of documents of above average legibility. STAC 5/M1/24
  • STAC 5/M1/24 - B A I D - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Hampshire - John Merret et Elizabeth uxor v John Sedgwick, Thomas Wadlowe, John Crooke
  • STAC 5/M48/18 - I D - 31 Eliz - Hampshire - Elizabeth Meryet, John Meryet v John Crooke Sr et al
  • STAC 5/M32/19 - I D - 31 Eliz - Hampshire - Elizabeth Moryett, John Moryett v John Sedgwyck, Thomas Wadlowe
  • STAC 5/M6/27 - I D - 30 Eliz - Hampshire - John Meryet, et uxor v Thomas Wadlowe
  • STAC 5/M34/7 - I D - 32 Eliz - Hampshire - John Merit, Elizabeth Merit v John Sedgwyck
  • see also STAC Merret

N

Norton v Norton

  • Deposition dated 5 Feb Anno 40 Eliz. John Fylder of the parish of Rotherwick co South’ yeoman aged 43. Richard Norton is possibly a constable. STAC 5/N4/2
  • STAC 5/N16/40 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Hampshire - William Norton, Charles Norton, Daniel Norton v Richard Norton, Peter Bettesworth et al
  • STAC 5/N12/9 - I D - 39 Eliz - Hampshire - William Norton, Danyell Norton v Richard Norton, Roger Gregorye
  • STAC 5/N12/29 - I D - 39 Eliz - Hampshire - William Norton, Daniel Norton v Richard Norton et al
  • STAC 5/N4/2 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Norton v Richard Norton
  • STAC 5/N4/33 - I D - 40 Eliz - Hampshire - William Norton v Richard Norton et al

O

Osborne v Pope

  • Bill (damaged): William Osborne of Fordingbridge, Hants v Andrewe Pope, John Shepparde, Thomas Metyearde, Nicholas Morden & William Pope. Lease of lands of Hospital of St John Baptist in Fordingbridge from the House & Hospital of ... ...osses by Winchester, Hants, to John Osborne, father of the complt. STAC 5/O3/3. (dk)
  • STAC 5/O5/26 - B A C - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v John Sheppard, William Pope, Nicholas Morden et al.
  • STAC 5/O2/5 - I D - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v Andrew Pope et al..
  • STAC 5/O3/3 - B C I D - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v Andrew Pope, William Pope, Nicholas Morden et al.
  • STAC 5/O4/1 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v Andrew Pope, John Sheppard et al.
  • STAC 5/O6/7 - A - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v Andrew Pope, Nicholas Morden, Thomas Meetyard.
  • STAC 5/O7/3 - I D - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - William Osborne v Thomas Mctyeare, Andrew Pope et al.
  • see also STAC Osborne

P

Q

R

Reade v Edwards

  • In re a parcell of land called Coneygarth in Peterfield co South’ STAC 5/R1/4
  • STAC 5/R33/33 - B A Rn - 44 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Reade v Edmund Marvyn, Charles Edwards et al
  • STAC 5/R1/4 - I D - 44 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Read v Charles Edwards, Thomas Shorter
  • see also STAC Read

Ringwood v Bulkley

  • Bill of Complaint of Henry Ryngwood of Crydlesowe in co Sowth’ esquire. John Bulkley of Burgate in co Sowth’ esquire, William Osborn and Thomas Charnell brought cases against him in other courts. STAC 5/R1/11
  • STAC 5/R43/7 - Rn - - Hampshire - Henry Ringwoode v John Bunckley
  • STAC 5/R23/26 - I D - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v William Hill, William North
  • STAC 5/R40/16 - B A Dr - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringewood v Thomas Barnes, Francis Bulkeley et al
  • STAC 5/R31/24 - C I D - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkley et al
  • STAC 5/R24/22 - I D - 36 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkley, Edward WIlloughby et al
  • STAC 5/R15/11 - Rr - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringewood v John Bulkeley, Thomas Charnell
  • STAC 5/R2/16 - B A - 37 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkeley
  • STAC 5/R4/36 - I D - 34 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringewoode v Thomas Charnells, Thomas Barnes et al
  • STAC 5/R3/13 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Rynwood v John Bulkely et al
  • STAC 5/R1/11 - B - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v John Bulkely, William Osborn, Thomas Chawell, Ambrose Ringwood
  • STAC 5/R5/37 - I D - 30 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringwood v Francis Bulkeley
  • see also STAC Ringwood

S

T

Tappe v Stonor

  • TNA Note: Perjury in a Chancery suit as to the manor of Pennington. STAC 7/6/4
  • STAC 5/T20/26 - I D - 30 Eliz - Hampshire - John Tappe, Dorothy Tappe v Francis Stoner
  • STAC 5/T29/20 - I D - 30 Eliz - Hampshire - John Tappe, Dorothy Tappe v Thomas Lymmyng
  • STAC 5/T25/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Dorothy Tapp, John Tapp v Francis Stonor et al
  • STAC 7/6/4 - - - Hampshire - John Tappe et Dorothy uxor v Francis Stonar, Thomas Lyminge
  • see also STAC Tappe

UV

W

Waller v Brooke

  • William Waller of Old Stoke Charity co South. In re the vicaredge house of Sopley co South. STAC 5/W3/18
  • STAC 5/W3/18 - B A - Easter 36 Eliz - Hampshire - William Waller v Ann Brooke, Philemon Brooke, Arthur Brooke
  • STAC 5/W37/30 - I D - 36 Eliz - Hampshire - William Waller v Anne Brooke et al
  • see also STAC Waller

Worsam v Habyn

  • Bill of Thomas Worsam of Lassam on co South yeoman, had a messuage and forty acres of land in Benstead co South. Wm Habyn of Benstead husbandman. Depositions taken at Winchester. STAC 5/W3/1
  • STAC 5/W3/1 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Worsam v William Habyn et Elizabeth uxor, Susan Edsell
  • STAC 5/W58/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Worsham v William Habyne et al
  • STAC 5/W60/33 - I D - 44 Eliz - Hampshire - Thomas Worsam v Elizabeth Habin, William Habin, Suzan Edsoll
  • see also STAC Worsam

XYZ

Attorney General

AG v Cecil

  • Co. Southt. STAC 5/A38/28
  • STAC 5/A38/28 - A - 44 Eliz - Hampshire - AG v Raphe Secile

AG v Deane

  • TNA Note: Canford and Christchurch: Burning heather and consequent damage. STAC 7/10/9
  • STAC 7/10/9 - - - Dorset, Hampshire - AG v William Deane, Robert Deane, George Kirley, Nicholas Emberley et al
  • see also STAC Deane

AG v Hunt

  • Kathrington (now Catherington) co of Suthampton. STAC 5/A39/10
  • STAC 5/A29/31 - B - 44 Eliz - Hampshire - AG v Nicholas Hunt, Francis Clement, Raufe Cerle et al
  • STAC 5/A39/10 - I D - 45 Eliz - Hampshire - AG v Nicholas Huntt et al
  • see also STAC Hunt