Difference between revisions of "STAC co Chester"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' Cheshire ''' | ''' Cheshire ''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed. ''' | ||
''' A ''' | ''' A ''' | ||
Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
*At the dwelling house of one John Curtyse of Culday [? Caldy] co Chester attacked by an armed mob. STAC 5/A3/14 | *At the dwelling house of one John Curtyse of Culday [? Caldy] co Chester attacked by an armed mob. STAC 5/A3/14 | ||
*STAC 5/A3/14 - B A - Mich 43/44 Eliz - Cheshire - Robert Andrew, John Andrew v John Curthyse, William Andrew, Henry Andrew, Roger Eaton, John Hogg, John Rathbone et al | *STAC 5/A3/14 - B A - Mich 43/44 Eliz - Cheshire - Robert Andrew, John Andrew v John Curthyse, William Andrew, Henry Andrew, Roger Eaton, John Hogg, John Rathbone et al | ||
− | *see [[STAC Andrews]] | + | *see also [[STAC Andrews]] |
''' Aston v Bressey''' | ''' Aston v Bressey''' | ||
Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
*STAC 5/A3/32 - B - Trin 39 Eliz - Cheshire - Thomas Aston v John Bressey Sr, John Bressey Jr, Richard Rathbone, William Pulford, Geoffrey Cotton, Robert Burton | *STAC 5/A3/32 - B - Trin 39 Eliz - Cheshire - Thomas Aston v John Bressey Sr, John Bressey Jr, Richard Rathbone, William Pulford, Geoffrey Cotton, Robert Burton | ||
*STAC 5/A32/3 - B - 43 Eliz - - Thomas Aston, Peter Yonge v Peter Watte, Robert Watte, Peter Coppocke, John Coppocke, Thomas Held et al | *STAC 5/A32/3 - B - 43 Eliz - - Thomas Aston, Peter Yonge v Peter Watte, Robert Watte, Peter Coppocke, John Coppocke, Thomas Held et al | ||
− | *see [[STAC Aston]] | + | *see also [[STAC Aston]] |
+ | |||
+ | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' AG v Hyde ''' | ||
+ | *The sessions at Bunbury co Cheshire. STAC 5/A7/32 | ||
+ | *STAC 5/A7/32 - I D - 10 Eliz - Cheshire - AG v Robert Hyde, Sir Edward Fytton et al | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Hyde]] | ||
− | + | '' B ''' | |
''' Brereton v Kerison''' | ''' Brereton v Kerison''' | ||
Line 24: | Line 33: | ||
*STAC 5/B16/21 - I D - 39 Eliz - Sir William Bruerton v John Kerysom, William Kerysom | *STAC 5/B16/21 - I D - 39 Eliz - Sir William Bruerton v John Kerysom, William Kerysom | ||
*STAC 5/B17/5 - I D - 39 Eliz - Sir William Brereton v John Keryson, William Keryson | *STAC 5/B17/5 - I D - 39 Eliz - Sir William Brereton v John Keryson, William Keryson | ||
− | *see [[STAC Brereton]] | + | *see also [[STAC Brereton]] |
''' Brereton v Powell and Cotes''' | ''' Brereton v Powell and Cotes''' | ||
Line 31: | Line 40: | ||
*STAC 7/10/37 - - - Cheshire - William Brearton v Thomas Powell, John Knighte, Alexander Cotes, Thomas Lyngall et al | *STAC 7/10/37 - - - Cheshire - William Brearton v Thomas Powell, John Knighte, Alexander Cotes, Thomas Lyngall et al | ||
*STAC 5/B36/16 - I D - 43 Eliz - William Bureton v Thomas Powel, Alexander Coles | *STAC 5/B36/16 - I D - 43 Eliz - William Bureton v Thomas Powel, Alexander Coles | ||
− | *see [[STAC Brereton]] | + | *see also [[STAC Brereton]] |
''' Bromfield v Brown''' | ''' Bromfield v Brown''' | ||
Line 47: | Line 56: | ||
*STAC 5/B97/5 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Bromfyld v Robert Wood et al | *STAC 5/B97/5 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Bromfyld v Robert Wood et al | ||
*STAC 5/B99/12 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Bromfeild v Margaret Ward alias Buckley, Arthur Parker et al | *STAC 5/B99/12 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Bromfeild v Margaret Ward alias Buckley, Arthur Parker et al | ||
− | *see [[STAC Bromfield]] | + | *see also [[STAC Bromfield]] |
''' C ''' | ''' C ''' | ||
Line 64: | Line 73: | ||
*STAC 5/C6/7 - B A Rn C I - 33 Eliz - Hugh Cholmondley et uxor v Charles Holford, Thomas Holford | *STAC 5/C6/7 - B A Rn C I - 33 Eliz - Hugh Cholmondley et uxor v Charles Holford, Thomas Holford | ||
*STAC 5/C67/38 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Hugh Cholmondley, Lady Mary Cholmondley v Sir Thomas Holford | *STAC 5/C67/38 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Hugh Cholmondley, Lady Mary Cholmondley v Sir Thomas Holford | ||
− | *see [[STAC Cholmondeley | + | *see also [[STAC Cholmondeley]] |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
''' Corbett v Bulkley ''' | ''' Corbett v Bulkley ''' | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
*STAC 5/C62/31 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Cheshire - Peter Corbett v Ranulphe Bulckley, Richard Bracey et al | *STAC 5/C62/31 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Cheshire - Peter Corbett v Ranulphe Bulckley, Richard Bracey et al | ||
*STAC 5/C27/26 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cheshire - Peter Corbett v Ralph Bulkley, William Leuster | *STAC 5/C27/26 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cheshire - Peter Corbett v Ralph Bulkley, William Leuster | ||
− | *see [[STAC Corbett]] | + | *see also [[STAC Corbett]] |
''' D ''' | ''' D ''' | ||
+ | * | ||
+ | ''' E ''' | ||
− | ''' | + | ''' Eggerton v Smethwick ''' |
− | *STAC 5/ | + | *Depositions by Landen and Smethwicke both of Cheshire. In re the Manor of Smallewood co Chester. STAC 5/E1/11 |
− | *STAC 5/ | + | *STAC 5/E1/11 - I D - 42 Eliz - Cheshire - Edward Eggerton v William Smethwick, William Llauden |
− | + | *see also [[STAC Egerton]] | |
− | *see [[STAC | ||
− | |||
− | |||
''' F ''' | ''' F ''' | ||
Line 96: | Line 95: | ||
*That whereas one John Wighe of the Bothes in the co. of Chester, esquire.” In re land in Rostorne in co Chester. STAC 5/F11/29 | *That whereas one John Wighe of the Bothes in the co. of Chester, esquire.” In re land in Rostorne in co Chester. STAC 5/F11/29 | ||
*STAC 5/F11/29 - B - 21 Eliz - Cheshire - John Fallowes v Nicholas Urnestone, Richard Urnestone et al | *STAC 5/F11/29 - B - 21 Eliz - Cheshire - John Fallowes v Nicholas Urnestone, Richard Urnestone et al | ||
− | *see [[STAC Fallows]] | + | *see also [[STAC Fallows]] |
''' G ''' | ''' G ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Griffin]] | + | *see also [[STAC Griffin]] |
''' H ''' | ''' H ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Hyde]] - see [[STAC Hurlestone]] | + | *see also [[STAC Hyde]] - see [[STAC Hurlestone]] |
''' IJ ''' | ''' IJ ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Ireland]] | + | *see also [[STAC Ireland]] |
''' K ''' | ''' K ''' | ||
* | * | ||
''' L ''' | ''' L ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Leigh]] - see [[STAC Littleton]] | + | *see also [[STAC Leigh]] - see [[STAC Littleton]] |
''' M ''' | ''' M ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Massey]] | + | *see also [[STAC Massey]] |
''' N ''' | ''' N ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Normansell]] | + | *see also [[STAC Normansell]] |
''' O ''' | ''' O ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Oxton]] | + | *see also [[STAC Oxton]] |
''' P ''' | ''' P ''' | ||
* | * | ||
Line 119: | Line 118: | ||
* | * | ||
''' R ''' | ''' R ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Roden]] - see [[STAC Rodes]] | + | *see also [[STAC Roden]] - see [[STAC Rodes]] |
''' S ''' | ''' S ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Stanley]] - see [[STAC Smith, S-Z]] - see [[STAC Swettenham]] | + | *see also [[STAC Stanley]] - see [[STAC Smith, S-Z]] - see [[STAC Swettenham]] |
''' T ''' | ''' T ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Trafford]] - see [[STAC Trueman]] | + | *see also [[STAC Trafford]] - see [[STAC Trueman]] |
''' UV ''' | ''' UV ''' | ||
* | * | ||
''' W ''' | ''' W ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Warburton]] - see [[STAC Willoughby]] - see [[STAC Whitney]] - see [[STAC Wilbram]] | + | *see also [[STAC Warburton]] - see [[STAC Willoughby]] - see [[STAC Whitney]] - see [[STAC Wilbram]] |
''' X ''' | ''' X ''' | ||
* | * |
Revision as of 08:30, 31 August 2015
Cheshire
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
A
Andrew v Andrew
- At the dwelling house of one John Curtyse of Culday [? Caldy] co Chester attacked by an armed mob. STAC 5/A3/14
- STAC 5/A3/14 - B A - Mich 43/44 Eliz - Cheshire - Robert Andrew, John Andrew v John Curthyse, William Andrew, Henry Andrew, Roger Eaton, John Hogg, John Rathbone et al
- see also STAC Andrews
Aston v Bressey
- Thomas Aston of Aston, Lancashire. In re the manor of Terton alias Teverton in Cheshire. STAC 5/A3/32
- STAC 5/A3/32 - B - Trin 39 Eliz - Cheshire - Thomas Aston v John Bressey Sr, John Bressey Jr, Richard Rathbone, William Pulford, Geoffrey Cotton, Robert Burton
- STAC 5/A32/3 - B - 43 Eliz - - Thomas Aston, Peter Yonge v Peter Watte, Robert Watte, Peter Coppocke, John Coppocke, Thomas Held et al
- see also STAC Aston
Attorney General
AG v Hyde
- The sessions at Bunbury co Cheshire. STAC 5/A7/32
- STAC 5/A7/32 - I D - 10 Eliz - Cheshire - AG v Robert Hyde, Sir Edward Fytton et al
- see also STAC Hyde
B '
Brereton v Kerison
- Cheshire. Sir William Brereton of Brereton, Cheshire. Concerns land in Bradley, Cheshire. (dk) STAC 5/B93/26
- STAC 5/B93/26 - B A Rn Rr - 34 Eliz - Cheshire - Sir William Brereton v John Kerison, William Kerison
- STAC 5/B79/25 - I D - 34 Eliz - Sir William Brereton v John Kerison
- STAC 5/B105/30 - I D - 35 Eliz - Sir William Brereton v William Kerison
- STAC 5/B90/23 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Sir William Brereton v John Keryson, William Keryson
- STAC 5/B16/21 - I D - 39 Eliz - Sir William Bruerton v John Kerysom, William Kerysom
- STAC 5/B17/5 - I D - 39 Eliz - Sir William Brereton v John Keryson, William Keryson
- see also STAC Brereton
Brereton v Powell and Cotes
- TNA Note: Evasion of decree as to lands STAC 7/10/37
- STAC 5/B22/31 - I D - 40 Eliz - William Brereton v Alexander Cotes, Thomas Powell et al
- STAC 7/10/37 - - - Cheshire - William Brearton v Thomas Powell, John Knighte, Alexander Cotes, Thomas Lyngall et al
- STAC 5/B36/16 - I D - 43 Eliz - William Bureton v Thomas Powel, Alexander Coles
- see also STAC Brereton
Bromfield v Brown
- Cheshire, Property. STAC/B67/7
- STAC 5/B67/7 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - Cheshire - Robert Bromfeild v James Browne, Margaret Parker, Arthur Parker
- Answer of John Gardiner & George ?Paver or Parker?
- Answer of Ann Browne wife of James Browne
- Answer of Robt Woodde
- Depositions
- Bill (much damaged)
- STAC 5/B70/28 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Robert Bromfeild v John Gardner, James Browne, Arthur Parker
- STAC 5/B37/15 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Bromfield v John Gardener, James Brown et uxor
- STAC 7/18/65 - - - Robert Bromfeilde v John Gardener et al
- STAC 5/B103/38 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Bromfyld v George Paver et al
- STAC 5/B97/5 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Bromfyld v Robert Wood et al
- STAC 5/B99/12 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Bromfeild v Margaret Ward alias Buckley, Arthur Parker et al
- see also STAC Bromfield
C
Cholmondeley v Holford
- In Re Turves from Houlford Moss Co of Chester. STAC 5/C1/36
- STAC 5/C52/23 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Hugh Cholmondley v Robert Holford, Thomas Deane, Peter Stubbs et al
- STAC 5/C19/5 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Cheshire - Hugh Cholmelye et uxor v John Griffin, Richard Spencer et al
- STAC 5/C31/2 - I D - 20 Eliz - Cheshire - Hugh Cholmeley et uxor v John Griffyn, Richard Spencer, William Ithell et al
- STAC 5/C79/37 - B - 20 Eliz - Cheshire - Mary Cholmondley, Hugh Cholmondley v John Dutton, Robert Holford et al
- STAC 5/C41/38 - I D - 20 Eliz - Cheshire - Mary Cholmoldley, Hugh Cholmoldley v Thomas Holford, John Dutton
- STAC 5/C5/13 - B A Rn C I D - 20 Eliz - Hugh Cholmondeley v Randal Brereton, John Dutton, George Holdford, John Warren et al
- STAC 5/C1/36 - I D C - 21 Eliz - Cheshire - Hugh Cholmondely et uxor v John Dutton, George Holforde, Ralph Seyntpoole clericus, Robert Brome et al
- STAC 5/C8/19 - I Dn - 21 Eliz - Cheshire - Hugh Cholmondeley et uxor v John Dutton and Ralph Seyntpole
- STAC 5/C77/7 - C I - 33 Eliz - Sir Hugh Cholmeley v Thomas Babington, Elizabeth Hulford et al
- STAC 5/C6/7 - B A Rn C I - 33 Eliz - Hugh Cholmondley et uxor v Charles Holford, Thomas Holford
- STAC 5/C67/38 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Hugh Cholmondley, Lady Mary Cholmondley v Sir Thomas Holford
- see also STAC Cholmondeley
Corbett v Bulkley
- STAC 5/C2/13 - B A C I D - 33 Eliz - Cheshire - Peter Corbett v Ralph Bulkeley, William Leicester, Richard Brasye
- STAC 5/C62/31 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Cheshire - Peter Corbett v Ranulphe Bulckley, Richard Bracey et al
- STAC 5/C27/26 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cheshire - Peter Corbett v Ralph Bulkley, William Leuster
- see also STAC Corbett
D
E
Eggerton v Smethwick
- Depositions by Landen and Smethwicke both of Cheshire. In re the Manor of Smallewood co Chester. STAC 5/E1/11
- STAC 5/E1/11 - I D - 42 Eliz - Cheshire - Edward Eggerton v William Smethwick, William Llauden
- see also STAC Egerton
F
Fallows v Urnestone
- That whereas one John Wighe of the Bothes in the co. of Chester, esquire.” In re land in Rostorne in co Chester. STAC 5/F11/29
- STAC 5/F11/29 - B - 21 Eliz - Cheshire - John Fallowes v Nicholas Urnestone, Richard Urnestone et al
- see also STAC Fallows
G
- see also STAC Griffin
H
- see also STAC Hyde - see STAC Hurlestone
IJ
- see also STAC Ireland
K
L
- see also STAC Leigh - see STAC Littleton
M
- see also STAC Massey
N
- see also STAC Normansell
O
- see also STAC Oxton
P
Q
R
- see also STAC Roden - see STAC Rodes
S
- see also STAC Stanley - see STAC Smith, S-Z - see STAC Swettenham
T
- see also STAC Trafford - see STAC Trueman
UV
W
- see also STAC Warburton - see STAC Willoughby - see STAC Whitney - see STAC Wilbram
X
Y
Z