Difference between revisions of "STAC Woodfall"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Woodfall, Anne '''
 
''' Woodfall, Anne '''
*STAC 5/W34/32 - I D - 17 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cunye
+
*STAC 5/W34/32 - I D - 17 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cunye  
 
*STAC 5/W49/27 - B A - 16 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cuny, Thomas Burton et al
 
*STAC 5/W49/27 - B A - 16 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cuny, Thomas Burton et al
  
 
''' Attorney General '''
 
''' Attorney General '''
 
*STAC 7/1/8 - - - Lancaster - AG (Edward Coke) v John Woodfalle, Adam Hayward, Edward Eccleston, William Standishe, et al
 
*STAC 7/1/8 - - - Lancaster - AG (Edward Coke) v John Woodfalle, Adam Hayward, Edward Eccleston, William Standishe, et al
 +
**see [[STAC co Lancaster]]
  
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections:'''  
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections:'''
*STAC 7/1/8 - TNA Note: Prescott: Resistance to search for warrants
+

Latest revision as of 06:11, 16 June 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Woodfall, Anne

  • STAC 5/W34/32 - I D - 17 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cunye
  • STAC 5/W49/27 - B A - 16 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cuny, Thomas Burton et al

Attorney General

  • STAC 7/1/8 - - - Lancaster - AG (Edward Coke) v John Woodfalle, Adam Hayward, Edward Eccleston, William Standishe, et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections: