Difference between revisions of "STAC Woodfall"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Woodfall, Anne ''' | ''' Woodfall, Anne ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/W34/32 - I D - 17 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cunye | + | *STAC 5/W34/32 - I D - 17 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cunye |
*STAC 5/W49/27 - B A - 16 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cuny, Thomas Burton et al | *STAC 5/W49/27 - B A - 16 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cuny, Thomas Burton et al | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
*STAC 7/1/8 - - - Lancaster - AG (Edward Coke) v John Woodfalle, Adam Hayward, Edward Eccleston, William Standishe, et al | *STAC 7/1/8 - - - Lancaster - AG (Edward Coke) v John Woodfalle, Adam Hayward, Edward Eccleston, William Standishe, et al | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co Lancaster]] | ||
− | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections:''' | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections:''' |
− |
Revision as of 11:11, 16 June 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Woodfall, Anne
- STAC 5/W34/32 - I D - 17 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cunye
- STAC 5/W49/27 - B A - 16 Eliz - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cuny, Thomas Burton et al
Attorney General
- STAC 7/1/8 - - - Lancaster - AG (Edward Coke) v John Woodfalle, Adam Hayward, Edward Eccleston, William Standishe, et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections: