Difference between revisions of "STAC Welsh names IJ"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' David ''' | ''' David ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/J10/2 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - David ap Jevan v David Hoyd ap Griffith, David Edwards et al | + | *STAC 5/J10/2 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - David ap Jevan v David Hoyd ap Griffith, David Edwards et al |
*STAC 5/J1/16 - B - 23 Eliz - David ap Jones v Thomas Probert, Thomas William Howell, Thomas ap Jones alias Dee, John Thomas, John ap Jones et al | *STAC 5/J1/16 - B - 23 Eliz - David ap Jones v Thomas Probert, Thomas William Howell, Thomas ap Jones alias Dee, John Thomas, John ap Jones et al | ||
*STAC 5/J5/8 - I D - 41 Eliz - David Lloid ap Jevan v Thomas Pryce et al | *STAC 5/J5/8 - I D - 41 Eliz - David Lloid ap Jevan v Thomas Pryce et al | ||
Line 31: | Line 35: | ||
*STAC 5/J15/25 - B - - John ap Jevan v Eynon Phillips | *STAC 5/J15/25 - B - - John ap Jevan v Eynon Phillips | ||
*STAC 5/J2/22 - B - - John ap Jevan v Roger Williams, Edward ap Hugh | *STAC 5/J2/22 - B - - John ap Jevan v Roger Williams, Edward ap Hugh | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' John''' | ||
+ | *STAC 7/10/25 - - - Flint - John ap Jevan, v Robert Lloyde, Edward ap Hugh | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co Flint]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' John''' | ||
*STAC 5/J6/38 - B - 33 Eliz - John ap Jones v Lysonte Willyame | *STAC 5/J6/38 - B - 33 Eliz - John ap Jones v Lysonte Willyame | ||
*STAC 5/J4/35 - B A - 34 Eliz - John Thomas ap Jevan v Watkin ap Watkyn, Howell Jenkin et al | *STAC 5/J4/35 - B A - 34 Eliz - John Thomas ap Jevan v Watkin ap Watkyn, Howell Jenkin et al | ||
Line 65: | Line 75: | ||
''' William ''' | ''' William ''' | ||
*STAC 5/J9/37 - I D - 22 Eliz - William ap John v Edward Loid, William ap Jevan et al | *STAC 5/J9/37 - I D - 22 Eliz - William ap John v Edward Loid, William ap Jevan et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' William ''' | ||
*STAC 5/J12/23 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 22 Eliz - Anglesey - William ap Madock ap Ievan v William Thomas, Rees Walter et al | *STAC 5/J12/23 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 22 Eliz - Anglesey - William ap Madock ap Ievan v William Thomas, Rees Walter et al | ||
− | * | + | **see [[STAC co Anglesey]] |
+ | |||
+ | ''' William ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 7/10/26 - - - Flint - William ap John, v Robert ap Jevan, Rice ap Jevan et al | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co Flint]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Bevan Case Index ''' | ||
+ | *Ap Cornelis v Evans - STAC 5/J16/24 | ||
+ | *Ap David v Edwards - STAC 5/J18/5 | ||
+ | *Ap Jevan v Ap Ithell - STAC 5/J9/40 | ||
+ | *Ap Jevan v Ap Richard - STAC 5/J2/21 | ||
+ | *Ap Jevan v Griffith - STAC 5/J10/2, STAC 5/J11/25, STAC 5/J12/35 | ||
+ | *Ap Jevan v Lloyd - STAC 7/10/25, STAC 5/J7/8, STAC 5/J6/13 | ||
+ | *Ap Jevan v Phillips - STAC 5/J15/25 | ||
+ | *Ap Jevan v Price - STAC 5/J5/8 | ||
+ | *Ap Jevan v Watkins - STAC 5/J4/35 | ||
+ | *Ap Jevan v Williams - STAC 5/J2/22 | ||
+ | *Ap John v Ap Jevan - STAC 7/10/26 | ||
+ | *Ap John v Ap Rees - STAC 5/J7/32 | ||
+ | *Ap John v Ap Richard - STAC 5/J5/16 | ||
+ | *Ap John v Ap Roger - STAC 5/J7/13 | ||
+ | *Ap John v Jeffreys - STAC 5/J15/26, STAC 5/J6/6 | ||
+ | *Ap John v Jones - STAC 5/J9/25 | ||
+ | *Ap John v Lloyd - STAC 5/J9/37 | ||
+ | *Ap John v Phillips - STAC 5/J2/18 | ||
+ | *Ap John v Rice - STAC 5/J14/14 | ||
+ | *Ap John v Somerfield - STAC 5/J7/11 | ||
+ | *Ap John v Williams - STAC 5/J10/12 | ||
+ | *Ap Rees v David - STAC 5/J22/20 | ||
+ | *Griffith v David - STAC 5/J19/5 | ||
+ | *Griffith v Penryn - STAC 7/17/18 | ||
+ | *Howell v Eyton - STAC 7/17/19 | ||
+ | *Howell v John - STAC 7/17/20 | ||
+ | *Jeffreys v Ap John - STAC 5/J10/3 | ||
+ | *Jevan v Ap Rees - STAC 5/J13/32 | ||
+ | *Jevan v Lewis - STAC 5/J8/2, STAC 5/J16/1 | ||
+ | *Jones v Probert - STAC 5/J1/16 | ||
+ | *Jones v Williams - STAC 5/J6/38 | ||
+ | *Morgan v Ap Hugh - STAC 5/J18/1 | ||
+ | *Morris v Ap Jevan - STAC 5/J19/15 | ||
+ | *Pritchard v Ap John - STAC 5/J22/23 | ||
+ | *Reynolds v Ap John - STAC 5/J19/35 | ||
+ | *Williams v Lloyd - STAC 5/J22/32 | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
− | * | + | *A Catalogue of Star Chamber Proceedings Relating to Wales compilled by Ifan ab Owen Edwards, Cardiff U P 1929 |
− | *STAC 7/10/25 - TNA Note: St Asaph: Messuage and land in Cilowen | + | *Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 49r. Perjury in a hundred court dismissed. John ap Price, plaintiff; John Dee et al. Perjury in a hundred court upon trial of an action where in the defendant gave damages paid to the plaintiff, dismissed and the plaintiff £20 fine. Trinity 35 Elizabeth (kk) |
− | + | *STAC 7/10/25 - TNA Note: St Asaph: Messuage and land in Cilowen. | |
− |
Revision as of 10:39, 20 May 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
David
- STAC 5/J10/2 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - David ap Jevan v David Hoyd ap Griffith, David Edwards et al
- STAC 5/J1/16 - B - 23 Eliz - David ap Jones v Thomas Probert, Thomas William Howell, Thomas ap Jones alias Dee, John Thomas, John ap Jones et al
- STAC 5/J5/8 - I D - 41 Eliz - David Lloid ap Jevan v Thomas Pryce et al
- STAC 5/J12/35 - I D - 33 Eliz - David ap Jevan v David Lloid Griffith
- STAC 5/J11/25 - B A C I D - 32 Eliz - David ap Jevyn v David Lloyd ap Griffith
- STAC 5/J17/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - David Jenn ap Lloid v Morris Vaughan
Griffith
- STAC 5/J9/25 - B A Rn C I D - 39 Eliz - Griffith ap John v Hugh Jones, Eleanor uz Edward et al
- STAC 5/J6/6 - I - 39 Eliz - Griffith ap John v David ap Humfrey ap John
- STAC 5/J5/16 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - Griffith ap John v George ap Richard, John Andrewe et al
- STAC 5/J15/26 - B - 39 Eliz - Griffith ap John v David ap Jeffrey, David ap Humprey
Hugh
- STAC 5/J10/3 - B - 44 Eliz - Hugh ap Davy Jeffrey v William ap John et al
Jevan
- STAC 5/J22/23 - B - 36 Eliz - Jevan ap Hugh ap Richard v Llewellen ap Jevan ap John, David ap Meredith et al
- STAC 5/J19/15 - Dr - 37 Eliz - Jevan ap Robert ap Moris v John ap Jevan, Edmund Prise et al
- STAC 5/J7/32 - B - 43 Eliz - Jevan ap John v Thomas ap Rees, Thomas ap Robert et al
- STAC 5/J13/32 - B - 43 Eliz - Jevan ap Jevan Jevan v Thomas ap Rees, Richard ap Rees, Thomas ap Roberts
- STAC 5/J14/14 - B - - Jevan ap John v Jenken Rees, Richard Jenkins, Griffith Jenkins
- STAC 5/J19/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - Jevan ap Renuilte v Richard ap John
- STAC 5/J18/5 - Rr - - Jevan ap David v David Edwards, Henry Owen et al
- STAC 5/J16/24 - B - 10 Eliz - Jenn ap Cornelis v James Evans, Lowrye Evans, Elizabeth Jones
John
- STAC 5/J22/32 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 22 Eliz - John ap William v Edward Lloyd, John ap David, David ap Lloid
- STAC 5/J22/20 - B A - 19 Eliz - John ap Rees v William David, Henry ap Hoell
- STAC 5/J15/25 - B - - John ap Jevan v Eynon Phillips
- STAC 5/J2/22 - B - - John ap Jevan v Roger Williams, Edward ap Hugh
John
- STAC 7/10/25 - - - Flint - John ap Jevan, v Robert Lloyde, Edward ap Hugh
- see STAC co Flint
John
- STAC 5/J6/38 - B - 33 Eliz - John ap Jones v Lysonte Willyame
- STAC 5/J4/35 - B A - 34 Eliz - John Thomas ap Jevan v Watkin ap Watkyn, Howell Jenkin et al
- STAC 5/J18/1 - B - 11 Eliz - John ap Morgan v John Wyn ap Hugh
- STAC 5/J19/5 - A - 39 Eliz - John ap Griffith v Humfry ap Davy et al
- STAC 7/17/18 - - - John Ap Griffith v Edward Penryn
- STAC 7/17/19 - - - John Robert Ap Hoell v William Eyton et al
- STAC 7/17/20 - - - John Thomas Ap Howell v Robert John et al
Margaret
- STAC 5/J8/2 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Margaret uz Jevan v William ap William, Lewis ap Richard et al
- STAC 5/J16/1 - I D - 35 Eliz - Margaret verch Jenn v Robert Lewis
Morris
- STAC 5/J7/8 - B - 37 Eliz - Morrice ap Robert ap Jevan v David Loid ap Robert, Edmund Price et al
Philip
- STAC 5/J6/13 - B A C - 17 Eliz - Philip ap Jevan v David Loid Blayney, Richard Price et al
Reynold
- STAC 5/J9/40 - B - 37 Eliz - Reynalte ap Jevan v Robert ap Ithell, Jevan ap Ithell et al
- STAC 5/J2/21 - B A - Trin 38 Eliz - Renold ap Jevan v John ap Richard, Robert ap Ellis, Robert Griffith et al
Rhys
- STAC 5/J10/12 - I D - 39 Eliz - Rice ap John v Henry Williams
Robert
- STAC 5/J7/13 - B A - 17 Eliz - Robert ap John et uxor v Oliver ap Roger, Edward Davis et al
Thomas
- STAC 5/J2/18 - B - 21 Eliz - Thomas ap John v Watkin Phe
- STAC 5/J7/11 - B - 36 Eliz - Thomas ap John, Griff ap John v Thomas Somerfild, Roger Byll et al
William
- STAC 5/J9/37 - I D - 22 Eliz - William ap John v Edward Loid, William ap Jevan et al
William
- STAC 5/J12/23 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 22 Eliz - Anglesey - William ap Madock ap Ievan v William Thomas, Rees Walter et al
- see STAC co Anglesey
William
- STAC 7/10/26 - - - Flint - William ap John, v Robert ap Jevan, Rice ap Jevan et al
- see STAC co Flint
Bevan Case Index
- Ap Cornelis v Evans - STAC 5/J16/24
- Ap David v Edwards - STAC 5/J18/5
- Ap Jevan v Ap Ithell - STAC 5/J9/40
- Ap Jevan v Ap Richard - STAC 5/J2/21
- Ap Jevan v Griffith - STAC 5/J10/2, STAC 5/J11/25, STAC 5/J12/35
- Ap Jevan v Lloyd - STAC 7/10/25, STAC 5/J7/8, STAC 5/J6/13
- Ap Jevan v Phillips - STAC 5/J15/25
- Ap Jevan v Price - STAC 5/J5/8
- Ap Jevan v Watkins - STAC 5/J4/35
- Ap Jevan v Williams - STAC 5/J2/22
- Ap John v Ap Jevan - STAC 7/10/26
- Ap John v Ap Rees - STAC 5/J7/32
- Ap John v Ap Richard - STAC 5/J5/16
- Ap John v Ap Roger - STAC 5/J7/13
- Ap John v Jeffreys - STAC 5/J15/26, STAC 5/J6/6
- Ap John v Jones - STAC 5/J9/25
- Ap John v Lloyd - STAC 5/J9/37
- Ap John v Phillips - STAC 5/J2/18
- Ap John v Rice - STAC 5/J14/14
- Ap John v Somerfield - STAC 5/J7/11
- Ap John v Williams - STAC 5/J10/12
- Ap Rees v David - STAC 5/J22/20
- Griffith v David - STAC 5/J19/5
- Griffith v Penryn - STAC 7/17/18
- Howell v Eyton - STAC 7/17/19
- Howell v John - STAC 7/17/20
- Jeffreys v Ap John - STAC 5/J10/3
- Jevan v Ap Rees - STAC 5/J13/32
- Jevan v Lewis - STAC 5/J8/2, STAC 5/J16/1
- Jones v Probert - STAC 5/J1/16
- Jones v Williams - STAC 5/J6/38
- Morgan v Ap Hugh - STAC 5/J18/1
- Morris v Ap Jevan - STAC 5/J19/15
- Pritchard v Ap John - STAC 5/J22/23
- Reynolds v Ap John - STAC 5/J19/35
- Williams v Lloyd - STAC 5/J22/32
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- A Catalogue of Star Chamber Proceedings Relating to Wales compilled by Ifan ab Owen Edwards, Cardiff U P 1929
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 49r. Perjury in a hundred court dismissed. John ap Price, plaintiff; John Dee et al. Perjury in a hundred court upon trial of an action where in the defendant gave damages paid to the plaintiff, dismissed and the plaintiff £20 fine. Trinity 35 Elizabeth (kk)
- STAC 7/10/25 - TNA Note: St Asaph: Messuage and land in Cilowen.