Difference between revisions of "STAC Welsh names E"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
+
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 
<BR> <BR>
 
<BR> <BR>
Line 19: Line 19:
 
''' ap Edward '''
 
''' ap Edward '''
 
*STAC 5/E3/27 - I D - 37 Eliz - Watkyn ap Edward v David Morgan
 
*STAC 5/E3/27 - I D - 37 Eliz - Watkyn ap Edward v David Morgan
*STAC 5/E16/14 - B A C - 30 Eliz - Watkin ap Edward v Morris Griffith, Jenn’ Myle
+
*STAC 5/E16/14 - B A C - 30 Eliz - Watkin ap Edward v Morris Griffith, Ievan Myle
  
 
''' ap Edward '''
 
''' ap Edward '''
Line 64: Line 64:
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 52r. A writ of privilege to discharge one that made affidavit being neither plaintiff nor defendant. Ed ap Prichard, plaintiff; Ed ap Williams et al, defendants: one Cook being arrested at the defendant’s suit Williams at such time as one Wood attended to make affidavit for serving of process of this court in this cause was discharged by writ of privilege of imprisonment and action. Hillary 35 Elizabeth (kk)
 
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 52r. A writ of privilege to discharge one that made affidavit being neither plaintiff nor defendant. Ed ap Prichard, plaintiff; Ed ap Williams et al, defendants: one Cook being arrested at the defendant’s suit Williams at such time as one Wood attended to make affidavit for serving of process of this court in this cause was discharged by writ of privilege of imprisonment and action. Hillary 35 Elizabeth (kk)
 
 
**see also [[STAC Welsh names E]]
 

Revision as of 05:28, 16 August 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

ap Edward

  • STAC 5/E1/16 - B A - 34 Eliz - Montgomery ? - Davis ap Edward v David Loyd, ap John ap Jenkin, Robert David Loyd, Griffith David Loyd, Lewis ap Cadwallader
  • STAC 5/E15/29 - I D - 34 Eliz - Montgomery ? - David ap Edwards v Lewis ap Cadwallader, Richard ap David Lloid et al

ap Edward

  • STAC 5/E4/40 - I D - 13 Eliz - Caernarvon - Meredith ap Edward v James Eaton
  • STAC 5/E8/30 - B A C - 13 Eliz - Caernarvon - Meredith ap Edward v Edward Eyton, Robert ap Howell et al

ap Edward

  • STAC 5/E8/37 - I D - 22 Eliz - Robert ap Edward v David Hanmer, Robert Stanney et al
  • STAC 5/E11/39 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Robert ap Edwards v Robert Slaney, Robert ap Richard, David Hanmer et al

ap Edward

  • STAC 5/E3/27 - I D - 37 Eliz - Watkyn ap Edward v David Morgan
  • STAC 5/E16/14 - B A C - 30 Eliz - Watkin ap Edward v Morris Griffith, Ievan Myle

ap Edward

  • STAC 5/E3/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - Richard ap John ap Edward, Edward Morgan v Richard Corbett alias Corbert
  • STAC 5/E14/3 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Richard ap Edward, Edward Morgan v Richard Corbett et uxor, Gruff ap Morice et al
  • STAC 5/M57/37 - A - 37 Eliz - Morgan Ap John Ap Edward v Richard Corbett

ap Edward

  • STAC 7/1/2 - B - - Denbigh - Ap Edward v William Lewis, William ap Lewis ap Robert

ap Ellis

  • STAC 5/E5/37 - B - 37 Eliz - Morris ap John ap Ellis v Cadwallader Watkyn, Watkyn ap Edward et al.

ap Ellis

  • STAC 5/E15/35 - B A - 44 Eliz - Morris ap John Ellis v Robert ap Ievan et al
  • STAC 5/E4/3 - I - 41 Eliz - Morice ap John ap Ellice v Robert ap Ievan Griffith, Robert ap John Belynyth.
  • STAC 5/E16/32 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Ellice ap John ap Morice v Ievan Robert Griffith, John ap Robert Velmth

Margaret verch Evan

  • STAC 5/E1/25 - B C A - 35 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evan v John David ap Howell, Robert Lewis, William ap William, Evan ap David ap Howell, William Vaughan ap Morrice et al
  • STAC 5/E5/34 - B A C - 35 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evane v Griffith ap Nicholas, Lowcie Lewes
  • STAC 5/E8/35 - B A - 35 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evan v John David ap Howell et al
  • STAC 5/E13/27 - I D - 36 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evan v William ap William et al

ap Evan

  • STAC 5/E6/6 - I D - 32 Eliz - David ap Evan v David Edwards
  • STAC 5/E12/15 - I D - 33 Eliz - David ap Evan v David Loyd ap Griff, David Edwards, Henry Owen

ap Evan

  • STAC 5/E7/24 - B A - 37 Eliz - William ap Evan v Thomas Lawrence, Richard Boydon et al

Elyssa ap Roland

  • STAC 5/E2/18 - B - 39 Eliz - Elyssa ap Roland v Cadwallader Price, William Gloucester, David ap William Gloucester, William Wyn et al.

Edmond

  • STAC 5/E16/9 - B A - 21 Eliz - Carmarthen - Edmond ap Richard ap Lewis v William Vaughan

John

  • STAC 5/E16/6 - B - 18 Eliz - John Eignon ap Thomas v William James, William ap Ievan et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 52r. A writ of privilege to discharge one that made affidavit being neither plaintiff nor defendant. Ed ap Prichard, plaintiff; Ed ap Williams et al, defendants: one Cook being arrested at the defendant’s suit Williams at such time as one Wood attended to make affidavit for serving of process of this court in this cause was discharged by writ of privilege of imprisonment and action. Hillary 35 Elizabeth (kk)