Difference between revisions of "STAC Warner"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 
 
''' Warner, Francis '''
 
*STAC 5/W3/24 - I D - 25 Eliz - Middlesex, Suffolk - Francis Warner et al v John Crampnell Interrogatories Transcribed [[STAC 5/W3/24]]
 
*STAC 5/W71/17 - I D - 27 Eliz - Middlesex, Suffolk - Francis Warner et al v John Crapnell alias Cracknell
 
*STAC 5/W48/12 - I D - 27 Eliz - Middlesex, Suffolk - Francis Warner, James Hargrave et al v John Crapnell
 
*STAC 5/H59/24 - B A Rn Rr I D - 26 Eliz - Middlesex, Suffolk - James Hargraves, Walter Kerrick et al v John Cracknell alias Crapnell
 
 
''' Warner, Gregory '''
 
*STAC 5/W83/37 - Rn - - Gregory Warnar v Thomas Brudenell, John Walton
 
*STAC 5/W4/38 - B A - 17 Eliz - Gregory Warner v Thomas Brudenell, John Walton, Robert Hotoste, Thomas Philips et al
 
*STAC 5/W10/2 - D - 18 Eliz - Gregory Warner v
 
*STAC 5/W58/9 - I - - Gregory Warner v Thomas Brudenell, John Walton
 
 
''' Warner, Henry '''
 
*STAC 5/W23/16 - B A - 32 Eliz - Henry Warner v Sir Henry North
 
*STAC 5/W26/27 - B A Dr Rn C I D - 32 Eliz - Henry Warner v Cymon Suckerman, John Sparhawke et al
 
*STAC 5/W11/4 - I D - 32 Eliz - Henry Warner v Simon Smackerman, John Clerke et al
 
*STAC 5/W28/22 - I D - 33 Eliz - Henry Warner v John Clerk, Charles Lumpkyn et al
 
*STAC 5/W82/37 - Rr - Henry Warner v Symon Sukerman, John Clarke
 
*STAC 5/W42/10 - B Dr - 37 Eliz - Henry Warner v Agnes Elsing, John Elsing
 
 
''' Warner, John '''
 
*STAC 5/W4/1 - Rn - 35 Eliz - John Warner v John Reeve, Richard Bury
 
 
''' Warner, Richard '''
 
*STAC 5/W67/37 - B A Dr - 28 Eliz - Richard Warner v Thomas Godwyn, Edward Nicholls et al
 
*STAC 5/W28/15 - I D - 28 Eliz - Richard Warner v William Goodwyn, Thomas Goodwyn, Edward Nichols
 
*STAC 7/31/23 - - - Richard Warner v Thomas Goodwyn et al
 
 
 
''' Warner, Robert '''
 
''' Warner, Robert '''
 
*STAC 5/W39/13 - I D - 35 Eliz - Robert Warner v Roger Clarke, Will Beard et al
 
*STAC 5/W39/13 - I D - 35 Eliz - Robert Warner v Roger Clarke, Will Beard et al
Line 43: Line 12:
 
''' Warner, William '''
 
''' Warner, William '''
 
*STAC 5/W43/32 - B A - 30 Eliz - William Warnor v Walter Jernegan
 
*STAC 5/W43/32 - B A - 30 Eliz - William Warnor v Walter Jernegan
 +
 +
''' Warner, William '''
 
*STAC 5/W19/2 - B Dr - 35 Eliz - William Warner, Thomas Hardie v Robert Palmer
 
*STAC 5/W19/2 - B Dr - 35 Eliz - William Warner, Thomas Hardie v Robert Palmer
 +
 +
''' Warner, William '''
 
*STAC 5/W27/30 - B A - 38 Eliz - William Warner v Robert Rayne, Edward Sympson et al  
 
*STAC 5/W27/30 - B A - 38 Eliz - William Warner v Robert Rayne, Edward Sympson et al  
 
*STAC 5/W69/31 - I D - 38 Eliz - William Warner v Edward Sympson, Robert Raynes et al
 
*STAC 5/W69/31 - I D - 38 Eliz - William Warner v Edward Sympson, Robert Raynes et al
Line 53: Line 26:
 
*STAC 5/A46/24 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v William Warner
 
*STAC 5/A46/24 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v William Warner
  
''' Bevan Case Index '''
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
*Hargrave v Crapnell - STAC 5/W3/24, STAC 5/W48/12, STAC 5/W71/17, STAC 5/H59/24
+
*Warner v Bennett - STAC 5/W24/24 ,STAC 5/W17/3, STAC 5/W35/8, STAC 5/W39/13, STAC 5/W49/3, STAC 5/W70/4
+
*Warner v Brudenell - STAC 5/W4/38, STAC 5/W10/2, STAC 5/W58/9, STAC 5/W83/37
+
*Warner v Elsing - STAC 5/W42/10
+
*Warner v Goodwin - STAC 5/W67/37, STAC 5/W28/15, STAC 7/31/23
+
*Warner v Jernegan - STAC 5/W43/32
+
*Warner v North - STAC 5/W23/16
+
*Warner v Palmer - STAC 5/W19/2
+
*Warner v Raynes - STAC 5/W27/30, STAC 5/W55/25, STAC 5/W69/20, STAC 5/W69/31
+
*Warner v Reeve - STAC 5/W4/1
+
*Warner v Suckerman - STAC 5/W26/27, STAC 5/W11/4, STAC 5/W28/22, STAC 5/W82/37
+
*Warner v Thaxter - STAC 5/W81/30
+
 
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
+
*STAC 5/W3/24 - Item whether have you with any other or others stollen any horse or horses mare or mares in any other Countie or Counties then the said Counties of Suffolk and Middlesex.
+
*STAC 5/W3/24 - Deponent John Crampnell of Franyngham in the Co of Suffolk yeoman 25 May Anno 25 Eliz
+

Latest revision as of 05:08, 13 June 2019

Warner, Robert

  • STAC 5/W39/13 - I D - 35 Eliz - Robert Warner v Roger Clarke, Will Beard et al
  • STAC 5/W35/8 - I D - 35 Eliz - Robert Warner v Roger Clarke, Antony Sambrock et al
  • STAC 5/W24/24 - B A - 34 Eliz - Robert Warner v Sampson Bennett, Roger Clarke et al
  • STAC 5/W17/3 - I D - 35 Eliz - Robert Warner v Roger Clarke, Sampson Bennet et al
  • STAC 5/W70/4 - I D - 34 Eliz - Robert Warner v Sampson Bennett, Roger Clark et al
  • STAC 5/W49/3 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Robert Warner v Sampson Bennett, Roger Clerk et al

Warner, Thomas

  • STAC 5/W81/30 - B Dr - - Thomas Warner v John Thaxler

Warner, William

  • STAC 5/W43/32 - B A - 30 Eliz - William Warnor v Walter Jernegan

Warner, William

  • STAC 5/W19/2 - B Dr - 35 Eliz - William Warner, Thomas Hardie v Robert Palmer

Warner, William

  • STAC 5/W27/30 - B A - 38 Eliz - William Warner v Robert Rayne, Edward Sympson et al
  • STAC 5/W69/31 - I D - 38 Eliz - William Warner v Edward Sympson, Robert Raynes et al
  • STAC 5/W69/20 - Rn - 39 Eliz - William Warner v Robert Raynes, Edward Simpson et al
  • STAC 5/W55/25 - Rn - 41 Eliz - William Warner v Robert Raynes, Edward Simson et al

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A38/1 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - AG v William Warner
  • STAC 5/A46/24 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v William Warner

Notes, Additions and Corrections