Difference between revisions of "STAC Tresham"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 +
''' Tresham, Thomas '''
 +
*STAC 5/T10/3 - B A - 17 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v John Foxbrooke, John White
 +
*STAC 5/T7/14 - I D - 18 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v John Fossbroke
 +
 +
''' Tresham, Thomas '''
 +
*STAC 5/T3/38 - B A Rn - Easter 19 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v George Robins, Alexander Robins, Robert Randulph, Harry Porter et al 
 +
*STAC 5/T14/39 - I D - 19 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v George Robyns et al
 +
*STAC 5/T24/20 - C I D - 22 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v Gilbert Hussey, George Robyns et al
 +
*STAC 5/T28/8 - I D - 22 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v George Robyns et al
 +
 +
''' Tresham, Thomas '''
 +
*STAC 5/T31/12 - B A - 22 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v John Gainsford, George Benyngton et al
 +
*STAC 5/T27/34 - I D - 22 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v John Gaynsford, William Allyn et al
 +
 +
''' Tresham, Thomas '''
 +
*STAC 5/T8/31 - B A Rn - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v William Dale, Henry Dale, Thomas Pennington et al
 +
*STAC 5/T5/8 - I D - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v Henry Dale, William Dale, Thomas Browning, Richard Stanton et al
 +
*STAC 5/T10/15 - C I D - 38 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tesham v William Dale, Henry Dale
 +
 +
''' Tresham, Thomas '''
 +
*STAC 5/T2/39 - B A - Trin 40 Eliz - Thomas Tresame, Francis Tresame, Francis Petit v Elizabeth Vaux, Ambrose Vaux, Philip Dobbes et al 
 +
*STAC 5/T1/3 - I D - 40 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresame et al v William Knighton, John Wyatt, William Haughton, Thomas Richardson
 +
 +
''' Tresham, Thomas '''
 +
*STAC 7/15/35 - - - Northamptonshire - Sir Thomas Tresham v Thomas Eyre, Humphrey Gorham et al
 +
**see [[STAC co Northampton]]
 +
 
''' Attorney General '''
 
''' Attorney General '''
 
*STAC 5/A13/36 - I D - 39 Eliz - AG v Thomas Tresham, Edmund Ludlow et al  
 
*STAC 5/A13/36 - I D - 39 Eliz - AG v Thomas Tresham, Edmund Ludlow et al  
  
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections:'''
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 +
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 12v. For receiving of seminaries and Jesuits and contemptuously refusing to be examined or to answer the privy council. Attorney Rex, plaintiff; the Lord Vaux, Sir Thomas Tresham, knight, Sir William Catesby, et al, defendants: convicted for entertaining of seminaries and Jesuits and contemptuously refusing to answer the privy council upon their such receiving of them, for which the said Lord Vaux was fined at £1000 the other 1000 marks but Griffin at £500 and to continue prisoners until the Queen’s further pleasure and that they conform themselves. Michaelmas Elizabeth 23 and 24 (kk)
 +
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 43r. For contempning Her Majesty’s proclamation made against Jesuits. Sir John Arundel, knight, and Sir Thomas Tresham, knight, defendants, for contempning Her Majesty’s proclamation made against seminaries, Jesuits, and the receivers of them which being proved against them were fined, Arundel 1000 marks and the other £500. Trinity 27 Elizabeth (kk)

Latest revision as of 06:35, 11 June 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Tresham, Thomas

  • STAC 5/T10/3 - B A - 17 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v John Foxbrooke, John White
  • STAC 5/T7/14 - I D - 18 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v John Fossbroke

Tresham, Thomas

  • STAC 5/T3/38 - B A Rn - Easter 19 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v George Robins, Alexander Robins, Robert Randulph, Harry Porter et al 
  • STAC 5/T14/39 - I D - 19 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v George Robyns et al
  • STAC 5/T24/20 - C I D - 22 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v Gilbert Hussey, George Robyns et al
  • STAC 5/T28/8 - I D - 22 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v George Robyns et al

Tresham, Thomas

  • STAC 5/T31/12 - B A - 22 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v John Gainsford, George Benyngton et al
  • STAC 5/T27/34 - I D - 22 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v John Gaynsford, William Allyn et al

Tresham, Thomas

  • STAC 5/T8/31 - B A Rn - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v William Dale, Henry Dale, Thomas Pennington et al
  • STAC 5/T5/8 - I D - 36 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresham v Henry Dale, William Dale, Thomas Browning, Richard Stanton et al
  • STAC 5/T10/15 - C I D - 38 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tesham v William Dale, Henry Dale

Tresham, Thomas

  • STAC 5/T2/39 - B A - Trin 40 Eliz - Thomas Tresame, Francis Tresame, Francis Petit v Elizabeth Vaux, Ambrose Vaux, Philip Dobbes et al 
  • STAC 5/T1/3 - I D - 40 Eliz - Sir Thomas Tresame et al v William Knighton, John Wyatt, William Haughton, Thomas Richardson

Tresham, Thomas

  • STAC 7/15/35 - - - Northamptonshire - Sir Thomas Tresham v Thomas Eyre, Humphrey Gorham et al

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A13/36 - I D - 39 Eliz - AG v Thomas Tresham, Edmund Ludlow et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 12v. For receiving of seminaries and Jesuits and contemptuously refusing to be examined or to answer the privy council. Attorney Rex, plaintiff; the Lord Vaux, Sir Thomas Tresham, knight, Sir William Catesby, et al, defendants: convicted for entertaining of seminaries and Jesuits and contemptuously refusing to answer the privy council upon their such receiving of them, for which the said Lord Vaux was fined at £1000 the other 1000 marks but Griffin at £500 and to continue prisoners until the Queen’s further pleasure and that they conform themselves. Michaelmas Elizabeth 23 and 24 (kk)
  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 43r. For contempning Her Majesty’s proclamation made against Jesuits. Sir John Arundel, knight, and Sir Thomas Tresham, knight, defendants, for contempning Her Majesty’s proclamation made against seminaries, Jesuits, and the receivers of them which being proved against them were fined, Arundel 1000 marks and the other £500. Trinity 27 Elizabeth (kk)