Difference between revisions of "STAC Topcliffe"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | |||
''' Topcliffe, Richard ''' | ''' Topcliffe, Richard ''' | ||
*STAC 5/T28/30 - B A Rn Rr - 14 Eliz - Richard Topclyff v William Dunwell, Ralph Kyghley | *STAC 5/T28/30 - B A Rn Rr - 14 Eliz - Richard Topclyff v William Dunwell, Ralph Kyghley | ||
| Line 9: | Line 12: | ||
*STAC 5/T8/3 - I D - 18 Eliz - Richard Topcliffe v Thomas Proctor | *STAC 5/T8/3 - I D - 18 Eliz - Richard Topcliffe v Thomas Proctor | ||
*STAC 5/T18/7 - I D - 19 Eliz - Richard Topclyff v John Proctor, Thomas Backhouse | *STAC 5/T18/7 - I D - 19 Eliz - Richard Topclyff v John Proctor, Thomas Backhouse | ||
| − | *STAC 5/T3/12 - B A C - 31 Eliz - Richard Topcliffe v Jane Sawyer, William Luddington, William Wake, Robert Luddington et al | + | *STAC 5/T3/12 - B A C - 31 Eliz - [[STAC co Lincoln]] - Richard Topcliffe v Jane Sawyer, William Luddington, William Wake, Robert Luddington et al |
| − | *STAC 5/T32/29 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Richard Topclyff v Jane Sawer, Katherine Marshall | + | *STAC 5/T32/29 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Richard Topclyff v Jane Sawer, Katherine Marshall |
| − | *STAC 5/T21/25 - I D - 31 Eliz - Richard Topcliff v Thomas Saunderson et al | + | *STAC 5/T21/25 - I D - 31 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Richard Topcliff v Thomas Saunderson et al |
| − | *STAC 7/6/29 - - - | + | *STAC 7/6/29 - - - [[STAC co York]] - Richard Topclife v Geoffrey Wrybarr et al |
| + | |||
| + | ''' Bevan Case Index ''' | ||
| + | *Topcliff v Dunwell - STAC 5/T28/30, STAC 5/T5/14 | ||
| + | *Topcliff v Proctor - STAC 5/T18/21, STAC 5/T32/18, STAC 5/T8/3, STAC 5/T10/29, STAC 5/T18/7, STAC 5/T20/23, STAC 5/T33/5 | ||
| + | *Topcliff v Sawyer - STAC 5/T3/12, STAC 5/T21/25, STAC 5/T32/29 | ||
| + | *Topcliff v Wrybarr - STAC 7/6/29 | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
*STAC 7/6/29 - TNA Note: Rylstone: Poaching and assault in the chase forfeited to the Crown by the Nortons. Geoffrey Wrybarr, vicar of Long Preston | *STAC 7/6/29 - TNA Note: Rylstone: Poaching and assault in the chase forfeited to the Crown by the Nortons. Geoffrey Wrybarr, vicar of Long Preston | ||
| + | *STAC 5/T3/12 - Richard Topcliffe of Somerbie in co Lincoln esq. William Sawyer of Somerby being in his lifetime tenant and farmer to the complainant. Was in debt for two hundred pounds and upwards | ||
Revision as of 23:44, 6 December 2018
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Topcliffe, Richard
- STAC 5/T28/30 - B A Rn Rr - 14 Eliz - Richard Topclyff v William Dunwell, Ralph Kyghley
- STAC 5/T5/14 - I D - 14 Eliz - Richard Topcliffe v William Dunwell, Ralph Kighley
- STAC 5/T18/21 - B A Rn Rr - 15 Eliz - Richard Topclyff v Thomas Proctor
- STAC 5/T33/5 - I D - 15 Eliz - Richard Topclyff v Thomas Procter
- STAC 5/T20/23 - C I D - 16 Eliz - Richard Topcliff v Thomas Proctor
- STAC 5/T32/18 - B A Rn C - 18 Eliz - Richard Topclyff v Thomas Proctor, John Proctor, Thomas Backhouse et al
- STAC 5/T10/29 - C I D - 18 Eliz - Richard Topclyffe v John Proctor, Thomas Backhowse et al
- STAC 5/T8/3 - I D - 18 Eliz - Richard Topcliffe v Thomas Proctor
- STAC 5/T18/7 - I D - 19 Eliz - Richard Topclyff v John Proctor, Thomas Backhouse
- STAC 5/T3/12 - B A C - 31 Eliz - STAC co Lincoln - Richard Topcliffe v Jane Sawyer, William Luddington, William Wake, Robert Luddington et al
- STAC 5/T32/29 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Richard Topclyff v Jane Sawer, Katherine Marshall
- STAC 5/T21/25 - I D - 31 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Richard Topcliff v Thomas Saunderson et al
- STAC 7/6/29 - - - STAC co York - Richard Topclife v Geoffrey Wrybarr et al
Bevan Case Index
- Topcliff v Dunwell - STAC 5/T28/30, STAC 5/T5/14
- Topcliff v Proctor - STAC 5/T18/21, STAC 5/T32/18, STAC 5/T8/3, STAC 5/T10/29, STAC 5/T18/7, STAC 5/T20/23, STAC 5/T33/5
- Topcliff v Sawyer - STAC 5/T3/12, STAC 5/T21/25, STAC 5/T32/29
- Topcliff v Wrybarr - STAC 7/6/29
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 7/6/29 - TNA Note: Rylstone: Poaching and assault in the chase forfeited to the Crown by the Nortons. Geoffrey Wrybarr, vicar of Long Preston
- STAC 5/T3/12 - Richard Topcliffe of Somerbie in co Lincoln esq. William Sawyer of Somerby being in his lifetime tenant and farmer to the complainant. Was in debt for two hundred pounds and upwards
