Difference between revisions of "STAC Tilley"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
''' Tylley, George ''' | ''' Tylley, George ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/T36/37 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - George Tylley v John Meare et al. Report [[STAC 5/T36/37r]] | + | *STAC 5/T36/37 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - George Tylley v John Meare et al. |
| + | **Report [[STAC 5/T36/37r]] | ||
*STAC 5/T4/13 - B C I D - 25 Eliz - George Tylley v John Meare, Henry Meare, Johanna Handcocke, William Phelpes alias Phelps, Thomas Lodcocke et al | *STAC 5/T4/13 - B C I D - 25 Eliz - George Tylley v John Meare, Henry Meare, Johanna Handcocke, William Phelpes alias Phelps, Thomas Lodcocke et al | ||
*STAC 5/T13/12 - I D - 26 Eliz - George Tylley v John Meare | *STAC 5/T13/12 - I D - 26 Eliz - George Tylley v John Meare | ||
*STAC 5/T7/7 - I D - 24 Eliz - George Tylley v John Okeley, Henry Okeley | *STAC 5/T7/7 - I D - 24 Eliz - George Tylley v John Okeley, Henry Okeley | ||
*STAC 5/T5/35 - I D - 25 Eliz - George Tilley v William Mitchell | *STAC 5/T5/35 - I D - 25 Eliz - George Tilley v William Mitchell | ||
| − | *STAC 5/T29/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - George Tilley v George Gilbert | + | |
| − | *STAC 7/6/14 - - - Somerset - George Tilley v George Gilbert | + | ''' Tylley, George ''' |
| + | *STAC 5/T29/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - Somerset - George Tilley v George Gilbert | ||
| + | *STAC 7/6/14 - B Rn - 23 Eliz - Somerset - George Tilley v George Gilbert | ||
| + | **[[STAC co Somerset]] | ||
''' Tyllye, Thomas ''' | ''' Tyllye, Thomas ''' | ||
| Line 21: | Line 29: | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
| − | |||
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 10v. For practice to entice the plaintiff’s daughter to contract herself. Tylley, plaintiff; Meere, defendant: for practicing both by himself, his letters, and messengers, to entice and allure the plaintiff’s only daughter, being but 13 years of age, to have contracted herself unto him. Michaelmas 27 Elizabeth fo. 42, 100 marks fine, Fleet, and good behaviour (kk) | *Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 10v. For practice to entice the plaintiff’s daughter to contract herself. Tylley, plaintiff; Meere, defendant: for practicing both by himself, his letters, and messengers, to entice and allure the plaintiff’s only daughter, being but 13 years of age, to have contracted herself unto him. Michaelmas 27 Elizabeth fo. 42, 100 marks fine, Fleet, and good behaviour (kk) | ||
Revision as of 13:24, 21 April 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Tylley, George
- STAC 5/T36/37 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - George Tylley v John Meare et al.
- Report STAC 5/T36/37r
- STAC 5/T4/13 - B C I D - 25 Eliz - George Tylley v John Meare, Henry Meare, Johanna Handcocke, William Phelpes alias Phelps, Thomas Lodcocke et al
- STAC 5/T13/12 - I D - 26 Eliz - George Tylley v John Meare
- STAC 5/T7/7 - I D - 24 Eliz - George Tylley v John Okeley, Henry Okeley
- STAC 5/T5/35 - I D - 25 Eliz - George Tilley v William Mitchell
Tylley, George
- STAC 5/T29/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - Somerset - George Tilley v George Gilbert
- STAC 7/6/14 - B Rn - 23 Eliz - Somerset - George Tilley v George Gilbert
Tyllye, Thomas
- STAC 5/T11/37 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 30 Eliz - Thomas Tyllye v Richard Woolley, John Cooke
- STAC 5/T24/12 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Tylley v Richard Welley
- STAC 5/T18/11 - I D - 30 Eliz - Thomas Tylley v Richard Wolley
Bevan Case Index
- Tilley v Gilbert - STAC 5/T29/13, STAC 7/6/14
- Tilley v Meere - STAC 5/T4/13, STAC 5/T36/37, STAC 5/T13/12
- Tilley v Mitchell - STAC 5/T5/35
- Tilley v Ockley - STAC 5/T7/7
- Tilley v Wooley - STAC 5/T11/37, STAC 5/T18/11, STAC 5/T24/12
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 10v. For practice to entice the plaintiff’s daughter to contract herself. Tylley, plaintiff; Meere, defendant: for practicing both by himself, his letters, and messengers, to entice and allure the plaintiff’s only daughter, being but 13 years of age, to have contracted herself unto him. Michaelmas 27 Elizabeth fo. 42, 100 marks fine, Fleet, and good behaviour (kk)
