Difference between revisions of "STAC Sponder"

From Waalt
(5/S69/15)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Sponder, Richard '''
 
''' Sponder, Richard '''
*STAC 5/S69/15 - B A - 37 Eliz - Richard Sponder v Henry Willoughby, Richard Sherfeild et al
+
*STAC 5/S69/15 - B A - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Sponder v Henry Willoughby, Richard Sherfeild et al
*STAC 5/S76/37 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Richard Sponder v Henry Willoughbie et al
+
*STAC 5/S76/37 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Sponder v Henry Willoughbie et al
 +
**see [[STAC co Wiltshire]]
  
 
''' Sponder, Thomas '''
 
''' Sponder, Thomas '''
 
*STAC 5/S46/2 - I - - Thomas Sponder v Richard Sherfeild
 
*STAC 5/S46/2 - I - - Thomas Sponder v Richard Sherfeild
  
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections '''
*STAC 5/S69/15 - Richard Sponder of New Sarum, Wilts, mercer v Henry Willoughby, sheriff of Wilts, Richard Sherville, under sheriff, William Bower & Roger Sherville. Complt pursued in Common Pleas regarding a bond for the appearance of [blank] Smith at Exchequer. Appearance of Smith cannot be found in the record. Claim of fraud.(dk)
 

Latest revision as of 12:24, 8 June 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Sponder, Richard

  • STAC 5/S69/15 - B A - 37 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Sponder v Henry Willoughby, Richard Sherfeild et al
  • STAC 5/S76/37 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Wiltshire - Richard Sponder v Henry Willoughbie et al

Sponder, Thomas

  • STAC 5/S46/2 - I - - Thomas Sponder v Richard Sherfeild

Notes, Additions and Corrections