Difference between revisions of "STAC Spark"
From Waalt
(5/S29/12) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*STAC 5/S58/28 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Grace Sparke v Nicholas Sparker, William Rowe et al | *STAC 5/S58/28 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Grace Sparke v Nicholas Sparker, William Rowe et al | ||
*STAC 5/S13/12 - I D - 40 Eliz - Grace Sparke v John Fere | *STAC 5/S13/12 - I D - 40 Eliz - Grace Sparke v John Fere | ||
− | *STAC 5/S73/5 - B A I D - 42 Eliz - Grace Sparkes v Nicholas Sparke, Thomas Tyler | + | *STAC 5/S73/5 - B A I D - 42 Eliz - Grace Sparkes v Nicholas Sparke, Thomas Tyler. Report [[STAC 5/S73/5r]] |
*STAC 5/S30/13 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Grace Speark v Nicholas Sperk, Thomas Tyler | *STAC 5/S30/13 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Grace Speark v Nicholas Sperk, Thomas Tyler | ||
*STAC 5/S39/13 - I D C - 43 Eliz - Grace Spark v Nicholas Spark, Thomas Tiler | *STAC 5/S39/13 - I D C - 43 Eliz - Grace Spark v Nicholas Spark, Thomas Tiler | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
''' Spark, Robert ''' | ''' Spark, Robert ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/S43/18 - B A - 29 Eliz - Robert Sparke v Randle Manwaring, Edward Tenck et al | + | *STAC 5/S43/18 - B A - 29 Eliz - Cheshire - Robert Sparke v Randle Manwaring, Edward Tenck et al |
− | *STAC 5/S29/12 - I D - 29 Eliz - Robert Spark v Randall Manwaring | + | *STAC 5/S29/12 - I D - 29 Eliz - Cheshire - Robert Spark v Randall Manwaring |
*STAC 5/S10/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - Robert Spark v George Rump et al | *STAC 5/S10/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - Robert Spark v George Rump et al | ||
*STAC 5/S57/7 - B A - 44 Eliz - Robert Spark v John Colles, George Rumpe et al | *STAC 5/S57/7 - B A - 44 Eliz - Robert Spark v John Colles, George Rumpe et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ‘'' Bevan Case Index ''' | ||
+ | *Spark v Coles - STAC 5/S57/7, STAC 5/S10/13 | ||
+ | *Spark v Mainwaring - STAC 5/S43/18, STAC 5/S29/12 | ||
+ | *Spark v Spark - STAC 5/S58/28, STAC 5/S73/5, STAC 7/15/6, STAC 5/S13/12, STAC 5/S30/13, STAC 5/S39/13 | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
*STAC 7/15/6 - TNA Note: Perjury concerning will of plaintiff's late husband | *STAC 7/15/6 - TNA Note: Perjury concerning will of plaintiff's late husband | ||
*STAC 5/S29/12 - Breaking into a Wych house in the town of Wyche Walbancke, Cheshire.(dk) | *STAC 5/S29/12 - Breaking into a Wych house in the town of Wyche Walbancke, Cheshire.(dk) |
Revision as of 16:21, 24 April 2018
Sparke, Grace
- STAC 5/S58/28 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Grace Sparke v Nicholas Sparker, William Rowe et al
- STAC 5/S13/12 - I D - 40 Eliz - Grace Sparke v John Fere
- STAC 5/S73/5 - B A I D - 42 Eliz - Grace Sparkes v Nicholas Sparke, Thomas Tyler. Report STAC 5/S73/5r
- STAC 5/S30/13 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Grace Speark v Nicholas Sperk, Thomas Tyler
- STAC 5/S39/13 - I D C - 43 Eliz - Grace Spark v Nicholas Spark, Thomas Tiler
- STAC 7/15/6 - - - Grace Sparke v Nicholas Sparke, William Rowe, Edward Tayler, Thomas Tyler
Spark, Robert
- STAC 5/S43/18 - B A - 29 Eliz - Cheshire - Robert Sparke v Randle Manwaring, Edward Tenck et al
- STAC 5/S29/12 - I D - 29 Eliz - Cheshire - Robert Spark v Randall Manwaring
- STAC 5/S10/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - Robert Spark v George Rump et al
- STAC 5/S57/7 - B A - 44 Eliz - Robert Spark v John Colles, George Rumpe et al
‘ Bevan Case Index '
- Spark v Coles - STAC 5/S57/7, STAC 5/S10/13
- Spark v Mainwaring - STAC 5/S43/18, STAC 5/S29/12
- Spark v Spark - STAC 5/S58/28, STAC 5/S73/5, STAC 7/15/6, STAC 5/S13/12, STAC 5/S30/13, STAC 5/S39/13
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 7/15/6 - TNA Note: Perjury concerning will of plaintiff's late husband
- STAC 5/S29/12 - Breaking into a Wych house in the town of Wyche Walbancke, Cheshire.(dk)