STAC Purefey
From Waalt
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Purefey, John
- STAC 5/P53/22 - B - - John Purefeye v Robert Milnor, Richard Keelyng et al
- STAC 5/P59/2 - B A - 19 Eliz - John Purefey v John Rowley alias Carver, Thomas Wryte
- STAC 5/P40/8 - B A - 25 Eliz - John Purefaye, Francis Cheshire et al v William Butler, Nicholas More et al
Purefey, John
- STAC 5/P63/1 - B - 19 Eliz - John Purefey v Thomas Stapulton Sr, Thomas Stapulton Jr, Richard Sadler et al
- STAC 5/P49/6 - C I D - 20 Eliz - John Purefaye v Thomas Stapleton wt al
- STAC 5/P16/8 - Rn - 29 Eliz - John Purefay v Thomas Stapleton Sr, Richard Sadler et al
Purefey, John
- STAC 5/P47/25 - B - - Buckinghamshire - John Purefey v Cristopher Holman, Thomas Blanchard et al
- STAC 5/P34/8 - A Rn C I D - 30 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Purefey v Cristopher Holyman, Edward Barber
- STAC 5/P8/22 - D - 31 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Purefey v Edward Barber et al
- STAC 5/P61/24 - I D - 30 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Purefey v Cristopher Holyman et al
- STAC 5/P28/3 - I D - 30 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Purifie v Christopher Holyman
Purefey, John
- STAC 5/P20/34 - B A Rr - 32 Eliz - John Purysye v William Palmer, George Hollyman et al
- STAC 5/P29/26 - I D - 32 Eliz - John Purefey v William Palmer et al
Purefrey, Michael
- STAC 5/P59/26 - B A - - Leicestershire - Michael Purfrey v Thomas Smyth, Francis Dutton et al
- STAC 5/P8/29 - I D - 10 Eliz - Leicestershire - Michael Purefay v Thomas Smith, Richard Everat, Francis Dutton et al
Parfrey, William
- STAC 5/P46/39 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes et al
- STAC 5/P53/17 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes
- STAC 5/P13/26 - B A - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfraye v Thomas Stokes et al
- STAC 5/P37/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - William Parfrey v John Stokes, Christopher Stokes
- STAC 7/14/18 - - - Norfolk - William Parfrey v Thomas Stokes et al
- see STAC co Norfolk
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 40r. Perjury in the Exchequer punished. Purfrey, plaintiff; Barker: perjury in the Exchequer which being proved he was for the same and for that in his answer and examination to the plaintiff’s bill and interrogatories he had justified his depositions in the Exchequer he was fined and convicted upon the statute. (kk)
