Difference between revisions of "STAC Nicholson"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | |||
''' Nicholson, Barnard ''' | ''' Nicholson, Barnard ''' | ||
*STAC 5/N9/35 - B - 11 Eliz - Barnard NIcholson v Richard Hanke, William Hayes et al | *STAC 5/N9/35 - B - 11 Eliz - Barnard NIcholson v Richard Hanke, William Hayes et al | ||
''' Nicholson, George ''' | ''' Nicholson, George ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/N16/27 - B A C I D - 31 Eliz - | + | *STAC 5/N16/27 - B A C I D - 31 Eliz - [[STAC co York WR]] - George Nicholson v John Layton, Percival Atkinson et al |
*STAC 5/N14/11 - I D - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - George Nicholson v Percival Dickenson | *STAC 5/N14/11 - I D - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - George Nicholson v Percival Dickenson | ||
*STAC 5/N17/34 - Rn - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - George Nycholson v John Layton, Dente et al | *STAC 5/N17/34 - Rn - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - George Nycholson v John Layton, Dente et al | ||
| Line 14: | Line 17: | ||
''' Nicholson, John ''' | ''' Nicholson, John ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/N1/24 - B A - 43 Eliz - | + | *STAC 5/N1/24 - B A - 43 Eliz - [[STAC co York]] - John Nicholson, James Bushop et Susan uxor, Stephen Gaywood et Mary uxor, Humphrey Spittle et Judith uxor v Bryan Hoadlam, Ralph Fryer, Richard Bowes, William Denton et al |
''' Nicholson, Otes / Otho ''' | ''' Nicholson, Otes / Otho ''' | ||
*STAC 5/N14/25 - I D - 40 Eliz - Otho Nicholason v Thomas Hitchcock | *STAC 5/N14/25 - I D - 40 Eliz - Otho Nicholason v Thomas Hitchcock | ||
*STAC 5/N15/36 - I D - 40 Eliz - Otho Nicholson v William Cade | *STAC 5/N15/36 - I D - 40 Eliz - Otho Nicholson v William Cade | ||
| − | *STAC 5/N16/23 - Rr - 37 Eliz - London - Elizabeth Nicholson, Otes Nicholson v John Hawes | + | *STAC 5/N16/23 - Rr - 37 Eliz - [[STAC co London]] - Elizabeth Nicholson, Otes Nicholson v John Hawes |
*STAC 5/N7/11 - I D - 38 Eliz - London - Otes Nicholson et uxor v John Hawes et al | *STAC 5/N7/11 - I D - 38 Eliz - London - Otes Nicholson et uxor v John Hawes et al | ||
*STAC 5/N3/11 - I D - 37 Eliz - London - Otes Nicholason et uxor v John Hawes et al | *STAC 5/N3/11 - I D - 37 Eliz - London - Otes Nicholason et uxor v John Hawes et al | ||
| Line 46: | Line 49: | ||
*STAC 5/N10/9 - Interrs: ".. did you know Thomas Layton late of Sexhoe decd & Robt Layton late attainted of burglary his half brother son of Robt Layton late of Scutterskelf decd ..". Refers lands & tenements in East Layton (no county, but is N Yorks). Deponents from Yorks & Co Durham.(dk) | *STAC 5/N10/9 - Interrs: ".. did you know Thomas Layton late of Sexhoe decd & Robt Layton late attainted of burglary his half brother son of Robt Layton late of Scutterskelf decd ..". Refers lands & tenements in East Layton (no county, but is N Yorks). Deponents from Yorks & Co Durham.(dk) | ||
*STAC 5/N7/11 - London? Interr asks "Do you knowe William Armett of London haberdaysher ... do you not thincke him to be an honest man and so to have bine reputed for all the tyme you have knowne him, and did you ever knowe or heare that he was accused or charged with any lewd cryme or action .." | *STAC 5/N7/11 - London? Interr asks "Do you knowe William Armett of London haberdaysher ... do you not thincke him to be an honest man and so to have bine reputed for all the tyme you have knowne him, and did you ever knowe or heare that he was accused or charged with any lewd cryme or action .." | ||
| + | *STAC 5/N3/5 - Matthais Springham of London Merchant Taylor 36 | ||
Revision as of 22:14, 7 December 2018
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Nicholson, Barnard
- STAC 5/N9/35 - B - 11 Eliz - Barnard NIcholson v Richard Hanke, William Hayes et al
Nicholson, George
- STAC 5/N16/27 - B A C I D - 31 Eliz - STAC co York WR - George Nicholson v John Layton, Percival Atkinson et al
- STAC 5/N14/11 - I D - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - George Nicholson v Percival Dickenson
- STAC 5/N17/34 - Rn - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - George Nycholson v John Layton, Dente et al
- STAC 5/N7/28 - C I D - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - George Nicholson v John Laiton, Percival Atkinson
- STAC 5/N10/9 - C I D - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - George Nicholson v John Layton et al
Nicholson, Henry
- STAC 5/N12/13 - B A - 41 Eliz - Henry Nicholson v Richard Browne, Henry Powell
- STAC 5/N4/10 - I D - 43 Eliz - Henry Nicholson et uxor v Elizabeth ap Powell alias Dynar
Nicholson, John
- STAC 5/N1/24 - B A - 43 Eliz - STAC co York - John Nicholson, James Bushop et Susan uxor, Stephen Gaywood et Mary uxor, Humphrey Spittle et Judith uxor v Bryan Hoadlam, Ralph Fryer, Richard Bowes, William Denton et al
Nicholson, Otes / Otho
- STAC 5/N14/25 - I D - 40 Eliz - Otho Nicholason v Thomas Hitchcock
- STAC 5/N15/36 - I D - 40 Eliz - Otho Nicholson v William Cade
- STAC 5/N16/23 - Rr - 37 Eliz - STAC co London - Elizabeth Nicholson, Otes Nicholson v John Hawes
- STAC 5/N7/11 - I D - 38 Eliz - London - Otes Nicholson et uxor v John Hawes et al
- STAC 5/N3/11 - I D - 37 Eliz - London - Otes Nicholason et uxor v John Hawes et al
- STAC 5/N4/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - London - Otho Nicholson v William Brooke et al
- STAC 5/N4/31 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Otho Nicholson v Mathias Springham, Richard Brooke et al
- STAC 5/N3/5 - I D - 40 Eliz - Otho Nicholason v Matthis Springham et al
Nicholson, Robert
- STAC 5/N10/37 - B A - 20 Eliz - Robert Nicholson v John Allanson, Thomas Byrkhead
Bevan Case Index
- Nicholson v Allenson - STAC 5/N10/37
- Nicholson v Brooke - STAC 5/N4/13
- Nicholson v Cade - STAC 5/N15/36
- Nicholson v Hankey - STAC 5/N9/35
- Nicholson v Hawes - STAC 5/N16/23, STAC 5/N3/11, STAC 5/N7/11
- Nicholson v Headlam - STAC 5/N1/24
- Nicholson v Hitchcock - STAC 5/N14/25
- Nicholson v Layton - STAC 5/N16/27, STAC 5/N7/28, STAC 5/N10/9, STAC 5/N14/11, STAC 5/N17/34
- Nicholson v Powell - STAC 5/N12/13, STAC 5/N4/10
- Nicholson v Springham - STAC 5/N3/5, STAC 5/N4/31
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 5/N1/24 - messuage and two acres of land in Kirby Moorside co York. The jury of the manor court.
- STAC 5/N4/31 - Otho Nichollson, one of the examiners of the Court of Chancery. Refrs to a bill in Star Chamber brought by William Brooke of London, informer. See also STAC Brooke (dk)
- STAC 5/N10/9 - Interrs: ".. did you know Thomas Layton late of Sexhoe decd & Robt Layton late attainted of burglary his half brother son of Robt Layton late of Scutterskelf decd ..". Refers lands & tenements in East Layton (no county, but is N Yorks). Deponents from Yorks & Co Durham.(dk)
- STAC 5/N7/11 - London? Interr asks "Do you knowe William Armett of London haberdaysher ... do you not thincke him to be an honest man and so to have bine reputed for all the tyme you have knowne him, and did you ever knowe or heare that he was accused or charged with any lewd cryme or action .."
- STAC 5/N3/5 - Matthais Springham of London Merchant Taylor 36
