STAC Nettleton

From Waalt
Revision as of 17:51, 2 April 2018 by Hgood (talk | contribs)

Nettleton, John

  • STAC 5/N6/1 - B A Richard - 28 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettelton, William Nettelton, Robert Nettelton, Francis Nettelton v John Thrwynge, Robert Thwynge, William Danyell, John Craven et al
  • STAC 5/N8/26 - B I D - 29 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettleton, William Nettleton v John Thwinge, William Richardson, Thomas Dale et al
  • STAC 5/N17/20 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettilton v John Thwinge, Lawrence Golding et al
  • STAC 5/N17/40 - Rn - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettleton, William Nettleton, Robert Nettleton v John Thwing, Thomas Dales et al
  • STAC 5/N6/30 - C I D - 33 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettleton et al v John Thwinge et al
  • STAC 5/N8/31 - I D - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettleton, Robert Nettleton et al v William Normanvile
  • STAC 5/N5/8 - B A - 33 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettleton, William Nettleton, Robert Nettleton v John Thwinge, William Normavyle et al
  • STAC 5/N16/24 - B A Rn C - 31 Eliz - John Nettleton, William Nettleton v William Danyell, William Normavile
  • STAC 5/N8/2 - I D - 34 Eliz - John Nettleton et al v William Daniell et al
  • STAC 5/N4/1 - B Dr C - 35 Eliz - John Nettleton, Richard Nettleton v John Hotham, William Daniels et al
  • STAC 5/N17/36 - moved to STAC Nethermill

Nettleton, William

  • STAC 5/N15/2 - B - 32 Eliz - William Nettleton, Francis Nettleton v John Thwyng, Richard Thwyng, William Richardson et al
  • STAC 5/N12/15 - B A Rn I D - 28 Eliz - William Nettylton v John Thwyng

Bevan Case Index

  • Nettleton v Daniell - STAC 5/N4/1, STAC 5/N16/24, STAC 5/N8/2
  • Nettleton v Thwinge - STAC 5/N5/8, STAC 5/N6/1, STAC 5/N8/26, STAC 5/N6/30, STAC 5/N8/31, STAC 5/N17/20, STAC 5/N17/40, STAC 5/N12/15, STAC 5/N15/2

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/N6/30 - Interrs refer to whether or not Edward Nettleton of Emswell, Yorks made a will.(dk)
  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 46r. A sheriff for refusing to return an attachment into this court committed. Netleton et al, plaintiffs; Netleton, defendant: the sheriff of York was (upon an affidavit made that he refused to return a writ of proclamation of this court) committed. Trinity 29 Elizabeth (kk)
  • STAC 5/N6/1 - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 47v. Proofs. Two bills the first imperfect and yet the plaintiff admitted to use the proofs made in the first bill for the offences in the last. Bettleton, plaintiff; Twynge et al: two bills and the second bill preferred against some of the defendants in the first bill for the same offences, which was imperfectly laid in the first bill and therefore the plaintiff prayed that he might use the proofs in the first bill for proof in the second bill being but one matter in substance and varying but in form the which was ordered; a dedmius potestatem was also awarded to examine defendants who would not suffer the plaintiff to see their answers at such time as they answered by dedimus potestatem in the country. Hillary 31 Elizabeth (kk)