Difference between revisions of "STAC Locke"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Locke, John '''  
 
''' Locke, John '''  
 
*STAC 5/L39/40 - D - 5 Eliz - John Locke v John Newe  
 
*STAC 5/L39/40 - D - 5 Eliz - John Locke v John Newe  
Line 7: Line 11:
 
*STAC 5/L5/23 - I D - 6 Eliz - John Locke v Richard Jessewaye
 
*STAC 5/L5/23 - I D - 6 Eliz - John Locke v Richard Jessewaye
 
*STAC 5/L6/14 - I D - 6 Eliz - John Locke v Edward Garrington et al
 
*STAC 5/L6/14 - I D - 6 Eliz - John Locke v Edward Garrington et al
 +
 +
''' Locke, John '''
 +
*STAC 5/L24/32 - B I - - John Lock v Roger Cowper, Katherine Graunt et al
 +
 +
''' Locke, John '''
 +
*STAC 7/25/31 - - - John Locke ex parte
 +
 +
''' Locke, John '''
 
*STAC 5/L32/12 - A - 32 Eliz - Essex - John Locke v William Pollerde, John Graunt et al
 
*STAC 5/L32/12 - A - 32 Eliz - Essex - John Locke v William Pollerde, John Graunt et al
 
*STAC 5/L42/37 - I D - 32 Eliz - Essex - John Locke v John Grant, [blank] Gardiner et al
 
*STAC 5/L42/37 - I D - 32 Eliz - Essex - John Locke v John Grant, [blank] Gardiner et al
 
*STAC 5/L20/26 - I D - 33 Eliz - Essex - John Locke v William Pollard, John Graunt et al
 
*STAC 5/L20/26 - I D - 33 Eliz - Essex - John Locke v William Pollard, John Graunt et al
*STAC 5/L24/1 - I D - 32 Eliz - John Locke v Thomas Jollye, Roger Cowper et al
+
*STAC 5/L24/1 - I D - 32 Eliz - Essex - John Locke v Thomas Jollye, Roger Cowper et al
*STAC 5/L24/32 - B I - - John Lock v Roger Cowper, Katherine Graunt et al
+
**see [[STAC co Essex]]
*STAC 7/25/31 - - - John Locke ex parte
+
  
 
''' Locke, Thomas '''  
 
''' Locke, Thomas '''  
 
*STAC 5/L1/35 - B A - 31 Eliz - Thomas Lock v John Bennet Sr et uxor, John Bennet Jr, William Chanmen
 
*STAC 5/L1/35 - B A - 31 Eliz - Thomas Lock v John Bennet Sr et uxor, John Bennet Jr, William Chanmen
 
*STAC 5/L16/21 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Locke v John Bennet et al
 
*STAC 5/L16/21 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Locke v John Bennet et al
 
''' Bevan Case Index '''
 
*Lock v [unknown] - STAC 7/25/31
 
*Lock v Bennett - STAC 5/L1/35, STAC 5/L16/21
 
*Lock v Garrington - STAC 5/L5/23, STAC 5/L6/14, STAC 5/L29/31, STAC 5/L39/40, STAC 5/L44/27, STAC 5/L48/29, STAC 5/L49/5
 
*Lock v Grant - STAC 5/L24/32, STAC 5/L20/26, STAC 5/L24/1, STAC 5/L32/12, STAC 5/L42/37
 
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
*STAC 5/L42/37 - Interrs refer Essex Assizes & court roll of Tolleshunt Bowercher.(dk)
+
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 23r. A plaintiff after new answer to a bill put in to take advantage of the examination of the interrogatories preferred upon the old answer. The defendants at the suit of John Locke, plaintiff, were ordered to make a new answer to the plaintiff’s bill and the old answer ordered to be redelivered to the defendant, and the plaintiff to take such advantage as he can upon the examinations of the defendants upon the interrogatories as he did minister upon the first answer. Hillary 5 Elizabeth (kk)

Latest revision as of 06:04, 23 May 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Locke, John

  • STAC 5/L39/40 - D - 5 Eliz - John Locke v John Newe
  • STAC 5/L44/27 - I D - 6 Eliz - John Locke v Edward Garryngton, Jeromy Songer et al
  • STAC 5/L48/29 - I - - John Locke v Edward Garrington, Richard Jessewey et al
  • STAC 5/L49/5 - A - - John Locke v Edward Garrington, John Latham et al
  • STAC 5/L29/31 - Rn - - John Locke v Edward Carryngton, John Latham et al
  • STAC 5/L5/23 - I D - 6 Eliz - John Locke v Richard Jessewaye
  • STAC 5/L6/14 - I D - 6 Eliz - John Locke v Edward Garrington et al

Locke, John

  • STAC 5/L24/32 - B I - - John Lock v Roger Cowper, Katherine Graunt et al

Locke, John

  • STAC 7/25/31 - - - John Locke ex parte

Locke, John

  • STAC 5/L32/12 - A - 32 Eliz - Essex - John Locke v William Pollerde, John Graunt et al
  • STAC 5/L42/37 - I D - 32 Eliz - Essex - John Locke v John Grant, [blank] Gardiner et al
  • STAC 5/L20/26 - I D - 33 Eliz - Essex - John Locke v William Pollard, John Graunt et al
  • STAC 5/L24/1 - I D - 32 Eliz - Essex - John Locke v Thomas Jollye, Roger Cowper et al

Locke, Thomas

  • STAC 5/L1/35 - B A - 31 Eliz - Thomas Lock v John Bennet Sr et uxor, John Bennet Jr, William Chanmen
  • STAC 5/L16/21 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Locke v John Bennet et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 23r. A plaintiff after new answer to a bill put in to take advantage of the examination of the interrogatories preferred upon the old answer. The defendants at the suit of John Locke, plaintiff, were ordered to make a new answer to the plaintiff’s bill and the old answer ordered to be redelivered to the defendant, and the plaintiff to take such advantage as he can upon the examinations of the defendants upon the interrogatories as he did minister upon the first answer. Hillary 5 Elizabeth (kk)