Difference between revisions of "STAC Jermyn"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
''' Jermyn, Anthony ''' | ''' Jermyn, Anthony ''' | ||
*STAC 5/J17/16 - Rn - - Anthony Jarmyn v Thomas Dysney | *STAC 5/J17/16 - Rn - - Anthony Jarmyn v Thomas Dysney | ||
| Line 4: | Line 8: | ||
''' Jermyn, Edmund ''' | ''' Jermyn, Edmund ''' | ||
*STAC 5/J2/32 - B A - Easter 36 Eliz - Edmund Jermyn v Luke Unger, Edmund Johnson, Nicholas Olyver, John Dodson et al | *STAC 5/J2/32 - B A - Easter 36 Eliz - Edmund Jermyn v Luke Unger, Edmund Johnson, Nicholas Olyver, John Dodson et al | ||
| − | *STAC 5/J18/18 - I D - 36 Eliz - Edmond Jermyn v Luke Unger, Edmund Johnson et al | + | *STAC 5/J18/18 - I D - 36 Eliz - Edmond Jermyn v Luke Unger, Edmund Johnson et al |
''' Jermyn, John & Margery ''' | ''' Jermyn, John & Margery ''' | ||
| Line 15: | Line 19: | ||
*STAC 5/J18/14 - C I D - 24 Eliz - Sir Robert Jermyn v John Buckenham, Roger Stoker et al | *STAC 5/J18/14 - C I D - 24 Eliz - Sir Robert Jermyn v John Buckenham, Roger Stoker et al | ||
*STAC 5/J6/20 - I D - 24 Eliz - Sir Robert Jermyn v Robert Newgate, John Burkenham | *STAC 5/J6/20 - I D - 24 Eliz - Sir Robert Jermyn v Robert Newgate, John Burkenham | ||
| − | *STAC 5/J15/3 - B A C - 38 Eliz - Sir Robert Jermyn v Robert Dighton, Joyce Thorp | + | |
| − | *STAC 5/J9/16 - B - 38 Eliz - Sir Robert Jermyn, Thomas Dighton v William Dighton, Robert Dighton et al | + | ''' Jermyn, Sir Robert ''' |
| + | *STAC 5/J15/3 - B A C - 38 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert Jermyn v Robert Dighton, Joyce Thorp | ||
| + | *STAC 5/J9/16 - B - 38 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert Jermyn, Thomas Dighton v William Dighton, Robert Dighton et al | ||
*STAC 5/J4/9 - I D - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert Jermyne et al v William Belchworth et al | *STAC 5/J4/9 - I D - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert Jermyne et al v William Belchworth et al | ||
*STAC 5/J8/19 - A - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert Jarmyn, Thomas Dighton v William Belchworthe | *STAC 5/J8/19 - A - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert Jarmyn, Thomas Dighton v William Belchworthe | ||
| − | *STAC 5/G25/20 - Dr - 38 Eliz - Sir Robert German, Thomas Dighton v Gilbert Woodlyfe | + | *STAC 5/G25/20 - Dr - 38 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert German, Thomas Dighton v Gilbert Woodlyfe |
| + | **see [[STAC co Lincoln]] | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
*STAC 5/A57/31 - B A - - AG v Francis Jermyne, Richard Jones et al | *STAC 5/A57/31 - B A - - AG v Francis Jermyne, Richard Jones et al | ||
*STAC 5/A15/8 - I D - 8 Eliz - AG v Francis Jermye et al | *STAC 5/A15/8 - I D - 8 Eliz - AG v Francis Jermye et al | ||
| − | *STAC 5/A11/16 - A - 40 Eliz - AG v Edmund Jermyn et al | + | |
| + | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A11/16 - A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmund Jermyn et al | ||
*STAC 5/A2/40 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmond Jermyn, Robert Bateman, Rowland Thompson, Thomas Worth et al | *STAC 5/A2/40 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmond Jermyn, Robert Bateman, Rowland Thompson, Thomas Worth et al | ||
| + | **see [[STAC co Norfolk]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
*STAC 5/A3/12 - A - - AG v William Jermye, John Nelson, Thomas Hybberd, Robert Thurston, Robert Cutts | *STAC 5/A3/12 - A - - AG v William Jermye, John Nelson, Thomas Hybberd, Robert Thurston, Robert Cutts | ||
| − | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 10:27, 20 May 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Jermyn, Anthony
- STAC 5/J17/16 - Rn - - Anthony Jarmyn v Thomas Dysney
Jermyn, Edmund
- STAC 5/J2/32 - B A - Easter 36 Eliz - Edmund Jermyn v Luke Unger, Edmund Johnson, Nicholas Olyver, John Dodson et al
- STAC 5/J18/18 - I D - 36 Eliz - Edmond Jermyn v Luke Unger, Edmund Johnson et al
Jermyn, John & Margery
- STAC 5/J1/10 - A - 32 Eliz - John Jermyn et uxor, John Marshal et uxor v Thomas Martin
- STAC 5/J1/21 - B - 32 Eliz - John Jermin et uxor, Edward Marshal et uxor v Thomas Marton, Thomas Davill, Edward Bradshaw et al
- STAC 5/J17/6 - B A - 34 Eliz - Margery Jermyn, John Jermyn v Thomas Davill, Edward Bradshaw et al
Jermyn, Sir Robert
- STAC 5/J2/13 - B A Rn - Hil 24 Eliz - Sir Robert Jermyn v John Buckingham, Robert Newgate et al
- STAC 5/J18/14 - C I D - 24 Eliz - Sir Robert Jermyn v John Buckenham, Roger Stoker et al
- STAC 5/J6/20 - I D - 24 Eliz - Sir Robert Jermyn v Robert Newgate, John Burkenham
Jermyn, Sir Robert
- STAC 5/J15/3 - B A C - 38 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert Jermyn v Robert Dighton, Joyce Thorp
- STAC 5/J9/16 - B - 38 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert Jermyn, Thomas Dighton v William Dighton, Robert Dighton et al
- STAC 5/J4/9 - I D - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert Jermyne et al v William Belchworth et al
- STAC 5/J8/19 - A - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert Jarmyn, Thomas Dighton v William Belchworthe
- STAC 5/G25/20 - Dr - 38 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Sir Robert German, Thomas Dighton v Gilbert Woodlyfe
- see STAC co Lincoln
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A57/31 - B A - - AG v Francis Jermyne, Richard Jones et al
- STAC 5/A15/8 - I D - 8 Eliz - AG v Francis Jermye et al
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A11/16 - A - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmund Jermyn et al
- STAC 5/A2/40 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edmond Jermyn, Robert Bateman, Rowland Thompson, Thomas Worth et al
- see STAC co Norfolk
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A3/12 - A - - AG v William Jermye, John Nelson, Thomas Hybberd, Robert Thurston, Robert Cutts
Notes, Additions and Corrections
