Difference between revisions of "STAC Huntley"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Key: ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
 
''' Huntley, George '''
 
''' Huntley, George '''
*STAC 5/H73/19 - A - 22 Eliz - George Huntley v John Longdon, Gyles Heaven
+
*STAC 5/H73/19 - A - 22 Eliz - - George Huntley v John Longdon, Gyles Heaven  
*STAC 5/H56/26 - I D - 22 Eliz - George Huntley v John Longdon, Giles Heaven et al
+
*STAC 5/H56/26 - I D - 22 Eliz - - George Huntley v John Longdon, Giles Heaven et al
*STAC 5/H61/40 - B A Dr C - 40 Eliz - George Huntley v Matthew Poyntz, Thomas Heath et al
+
*STAC 5/H61/40 - B A Dr C - 40 Eliz - - George Huntley v Matthew Poyntz, Thomas Heath et al
*STAC 5/H58/7 - B A Dr - 40 Eliz - George Huntley v John Chambers, Humfry Chambers, Edward Poirre
+
*STAC 5/H58/7 - B A Dr - 40 Eliz - [[STAC co Gloucester]] - George Huntley v John Chambers, Humfry Chambers, Edward Poirre
*STAC 5/H16/21 - B Dr A C - 40 Eliz - George Huntley v John Chambers, Matthew Poyntes et al
+
*STAC 5/H16/21 - B Dr A C - 40 Eliz - Gloucestershire - George Huntley v John Chambers, Matthew Poyntes et al
*STAC 5/H80/34 - Rn - 41 Eliz - George Huntley v John Chambers, Matthew Poyntz et al
+
*STAC 5/H80/34 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Gloucestershire - George Huntley v John Chambers, Matthew Poyntz et al
*STAC 5/H4/15 - B A Dr I D - 40 Eliz - George Huntley v John Chambers, Christopher Coates, William Vizar, Richard Haning alias Hooper et al
+
*STAC 5/H31/30 - I D - 41 Eliz - Gloucestershire - George Huntley v Matthew Poyntz et al
*STAC 5/H39/28 - I D - 40 Eliz - George Huntley v John Chambers et al
+
*STAC 5/H4/15 - B A Dr I D - 40 Eliz - - George Huntley v John Chambers, Christopher Coates, William Vizar, Richard Haning alias Hooper et al
*STAC 5/H14/34 - I D - 40 Eliz - George Huntley v John Chambers, John Jeoffries alias Taylor
+
*STAC 5/H39/28 - I D - 40 Eliz - - George Huntley v John Chambers et al
*STAC 5/H31/30 - I D - 41 Eliz - George Huntley v Matthew Poyntz et al
+
*STAC 5/H14/34 - I D - 40 Eliz - - George Huntley v John Chambers, John Jeoffries alias Taylor
  
 
''' Huntley, Henry '''
 
''' Huntley, Henry '''
Line 20: Line 23:
  
 
''' Huntley, John '''
 
''' Huntley, John '''
*STAC 5/H6/40 - B A - Hil 42 Eliz - John Huntley v William Baker et uxor, John Baker, Thomas Maxas, George Trevillian et uxor, Henry Turner, John Ewen
+
*STAC 5/H6/40 - B A - Hil 42 Eliz - [[STAC co Gloucester]] - John Huntley v William Baker et uxor, John Baker, Thomas Maxas, George Trevillian et uxor, Henry Turner, John Ewen
*STAC 5/H66/10 - I D - 42 Eliz - John Huntley v William Baker, George Trevilian et al
+
*STAC 5/H66/10 - I D - 42 Eliz - Gloucestershire - John Huntley v William Baker, George Trevilian et al
*STAC 5/H31/30 - Interrs refer to Gloucester Assizes.(dk)
+
 
 +
''' Bevan Case Index '''
 +
*Huntley v Baker - STAC 5/H6/40, STAC 5/H66/10
 +
*Huntley v Brayne - STAC 5/H26/21 see [[STAC Hantley]]
 +
*Huntley v Chambers - STAC 5/H4/15, STAC 5/H16/21, STAC 5/H58/7, STAC 5/H14/34, STAC 5/H39/28, STAC 5/H80/34, STAC 5/H26/35, STAC 5/H29/12, STAC 5/H44/12
 +
*Huntley v Langdon - STAC 5/H56/26, STAC 5/H73/19
 +
*Huntley v Poyntz - STAC 5/H61/40, STAC 5/H31/30
 +
*Huntley v Rowdon - STAC 5/H61/36
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
*STAC 5/H6/40 - John Huntley of Bevington als Baynton, Gloucs. Assault upon the complt apparently due to the assailants displeasure at the complt having married Johan Pegler widow of William Pegler late of Bevington.(dk)
 
*STAC 5/H6/40 - John Huntley of Bevington als Baynton, Gloucs. Assault upon the complt apparently due to the assailants displeasure at the complt having married Johan Pegler widow of William Pegler late of Bevington.(dk)
 
*STAC 5/H58/7, 5/H16/21 & STAC 5/H80/34 - Gloucs, see Gloucestershire Archives D1086/L1: Interrogatories and depositions in Geo. Huntley of Boxwell, esq. v. John Chambers of Tresham, yeom., and Matt. Poyntz, 2nd son of Matt. Poyntz, of Alderley et al. [http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/adb8b8ee-a112-4ac0-8e6e-094a82fd3098].(dk)
 
*STAC 5/H58/7, 5/H16/21 & STAC 5/H80/34 - Gloucs, see Gloucestershire Archives D1086/L1: Interrogatories and depositions in Geo. Huntley of Boxwell, esq. v. John Chambers of Tresham, yeom., and Matt. Poyntz, 2nd son of Matt. Poyntz, of Alderley et al. [http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/adb8b8ee-a112-4ac0-8e6e-094a82fd3098].(dk)
 +
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 63v. For concealing of felony whereby the parties escaped upon slight bail. Attorney Rex; Huntley and three of the Purnells: for that Mr Attorney lodged and had private conference with one Brigge and Gilbert who had robbed the Purnells of £300 after the robbery and dealt with others to spare to be examined touching the same and there concealed his knowledge thereof, and the Purnells having received part of their money said they did not but suspect them albeit they knew them to be the men that robbed them. Fleet, £500 fine, and to make public acknowledgement of their offences at the assizes. Michaelmas 38 Elizabeth (kk)

Latest revision as of 16:38, 5 November 2018

Key: B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Huntley, George

  • STAC 5/H73/19 - A - 22 Eliz - - George Huntley v John Longdon, Gyles Heaven
  • STAC 5/H56/26 - I D - 22 Eliz - - George Huntley v John Longdon, Giles Heaven et al
  • STAC 5/H61/40 - B A Dr C - 40 Eliz - - George Huntley v Matthew Poyntz, Thomas Heath et al
  • STAC 5/H58/7 - B A Dr - 40 Eliz - STAC co Gloucester - George Huntley v John Chambers, Humfry Chambers, Edward Poirre
  • STAC 5/H16/21 - B Dr A C - 40 Eliz - Gloucestershire - George Huntley v John Chambers, Matthew Poyntes et al
  • STAC 5/H80/34 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Gloucestershire - George Huntley v John Chambers, Matthew Poyntz et al
  • STAC 5/H31/30 - I D - 41 Eliz - Gloucestershire - George Huntley v Matthew Poyntz et al
  • STAC 5/H4/15 - B A Dr I D - 40 Eliz - - George Huntley v John Chambers, Christopher Coates, William Vizar, Richard Haning alias Hooper et al
  • STAC 5/H39/28 - I D - 40 Eliz - - George Huntley v John Chambers et al
  • STAC 5/H14/34 - I D - 40 Eliz - - George Huntley v John Chambers, John Jeoffries alias Taylor

Huntley, Henry

  • STAC 5/H26/35 - B A Rn - 41 Eliz - Henry Huntley v John Jaques, Roger Clarke et al
  • STAC 5/H29/12 - I D - 41 Eliz - Henry Huntley v John Jaques
  • STAC 5/H44/12 - I D - 43 Eliz - Henry Huntley v John Jaques, Thomas Harris et al

Huntley, Joan

  • STAC 5/H61/36 - B - 20 Eliz - Jone Huntley v Alice Rowdon, Agnes Gwuilam et al

Huntley, John

  • STAC 5/H6/40 - B A - Hil 42 Eliz - STAC co Gloucester - John Huntley v William Baker et uxor, John Baker, Thomas Maxas, George Trevillian et uxor, Henry Turner, John Ewen
  • STAC 5/H66/10 - I D - 42 Eliz - Gloucestershire - John Huntley v William Baker, George Trevilian et al

Bevan Case Index

  • Huntley v Baker - STAC 5/H6/40, STAC 5/H66/10
  • Huntley v Brayne - STAC 5/H26/21 see STAC Hantley
  • Huntley v Chambers - STAC 5/H4/15, STAC 5/H16/21, STAC 5/H58/7, STAC 5/H14/34, STAC 5/H39/28, STAC 5/H80/34, STAC 5/H26/35, STAC 5/H29/12, STAC 5/H44/12
  • Huntley v Langdon - STAC 5/H56/26, STAC 5/H73/19
  • Huntley v Poyntz - STAC 5/H61/40, STAC 5/H31/30
  • Huntley v Rowdon - STAC 5/H61/36

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/H6/40 - John Huntley of Bevington als Baynton, Gloucs. Assault upon the complt apparently due to the assailants displeasure at the complt having married Johan Pegler widow of William Pegler late of Bevington.(dk)
  • STAC 5/H58/7, 5/H16/21 & STAC 5/H80/34 - Gloucs, see Gloucestershire Archives D1086/L1: Interrogatories and depositions in Geo. Huntley of Boxwell, esq. v. John Chambers of Tresham, yeom., and Matt. Poyntz, 2nd son of Matt. Poyntz, of Alderley et al. [1].(dk)
  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 63v. For concealing of felony whereby the parties escaped upon slight bail. Attorney Rex; Huntley and three of the Purnells: for that Mr Attorney lodged and had private conference with one Brigge and Gilbert who had robbed the Purnells of £300 after the robbery and dealt with others to spare to be examined touching the same and there concealed his knowledge thereof, and the Purnells having received part of their money said they did not but suspect them albeit they knew them to be the men that robbed them. Fleet, £500 fine, and to make public acknowledgement of their offences at the assizes. Michaelmas 38 Elizabeth (kk)