Difference between revisions of "STAC Howard"

From Waalt
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
  
 
''' Howrde, George '''
 
''' Howrde, George '''
Line 6: Line 7:
  
 
''' Howard, Charles '''
 
''' Howard, Charles '''
 +
*STAC 5/H50/21 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard alias Highte v Edmund Sudlow [Ludlow], Owen Bacon et al
 +
*STAC 5/H12/1 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard v John Helliar et al
 
*STAC 5/H72/25 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard v Owen Bacon
 
*STAC 5/H72/25 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard v Owen Bacon
*STAC 5/H50/21 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard alias Highte v Edmund Sudlow, Owen Bacon et al
 
*STAC 5/H12/1 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard v John Helliar et al
 
  
 
''' Howard, Henry (Viscount) '''
 
''' Howard, Henry (Viscount) '''
Line 17: Line 18:
 
*STAC 5/H8/4 - B Dr A Rn Rr - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v John Sherers, Thomas Pynnell, William Beale Sr, John Skull et al
 
*STAC 5/H8/4 - B Dr A Rn Rr - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v John Sherers, Thomas Pynnell, William Beale Sr, John Skull et al
 
*STAC 5/H46/32 - I D - 26 Eliz - Thomas Howard v Thomas Pynnel, John Sherer
 
*STAC 5/H46/32 - I D - 26 Eliz - Thomas Howard v Thomas Pynnel, John Sherer
 +
 +
''' Howard, Thomas '''
 
*STAC 5/H41/6 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer et al
 
*STAC 5/H41/6 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer et al
 
*STAC 5/H38/10 - I D - 28 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer et al
 
*STAC 5/H38/10 - I D - 28 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer et al
Line 22: Line 25:
 
*STAC 5/H33/23 - Dr A C - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howarde v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer, Richard Yonge et al
 
*STAC 5/H33/23 - Dr A C - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howarde v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer, Richard Yonge et al
 
*STAC 5/H6/1 - B I D - Mich 26/27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Edward Osborne, John Spencer, William Massame, Richard Branden et al
 
*STAC 5/H6/1 - B I D - Mich 26/27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Edward Osborne, John Spencer, William Massame, Richard Branden et al
 +
 +
''' Howard, Thomas '''
 
*STAC 5/H30/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al
 
*STAC 5/H30/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al
 
*STAC 5/H37/22 - I D - 35 Eliz - Sir Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al
 
*STAC 5/H37/22 - I D - 35 Eliz - Sir Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al
Line 34: Line 39:
 
*STAC 5/H13/24 - C I D - 26 Eliz - William Lord Howarde v William Acham, John Roper et al
 
*STAC 5/H13/24 - C I D - 26 Eliz - William Lord Howarde v William Acham, John Roper et al
 
*STAC 5/H6/25 - B A C I D - Hil 24 Eliz - William Lord Haward v William Acheham, John Morrys, Richard Morrys, John Roper alias Tucker
 
*STAC 5/H6/25 - B A C I D - Hil 24 Eliz - William Lord Haward v William Acheham, John Morrys, Richard Morrys, John Roper alias Tucker
 +
 +
''' Howard, William '''
 
*STAC 5/H44/25 - B A Rr C - 31 Eliz - William Lord Howard v Sir Robert Dennis
 
*STAC 5/H44/25 - B A Rr C - 31 Eliz - William Lord Howard v Sir Robert Dennis
 +
 +
''' Howard, William '''
 
*STAC 5/H53/28 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - Lord William Howard v Thomas Blyth
 
*STAC 5/H53/28 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - Lord William Howard v Thomas Blyth
 +
**see [[STAC co Cumberland]]
 +
 +
''' Howard, William '''
 
*STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon
 
*STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon
 +
**see [[STAC co Norfolk]]
  
''' Bevan Case Index '''
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
*Howard v Acham - STAC 5/H6/25, STAC 5/H13/24, STAC 5/H31/3, STAC 5/H34/27
 
*Howard v Beale - STAC 5/H30/34, STAC 5/H37/22
 
*Howard v Bell - STAC 5/H5/5, STAC 5/H68/37
 
*Howard v Blyth - STAC 5/H53/28
 
*Howard v Dennis - STAC 5/H44/25
 
*Howard v Gorges - STAC 5/H20/3, STAC 5/H29/11
 
*Howard v Ludlow - STAC 5/H50/21, STAC 5/H12/1, STAC 5/H72/25, STAC 5/H32/37
 
*Howard v Mulley - STAC 7/3/7
 
*Howard v Osborne - STAC 5/H6/1, STAC 5/H10/21, STAC 5/H33/23, STAC 5/H38/10, STAC 5/H41/6
 
*Howard v Pinnell - STAC 5/H8/4, STAC 5/H46/32
 
 
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
*STAC 7/3/7 - TNA Notes: Kenninghall: Resistance to a distress
 
*STAC 5/H53/28 - Interrogatories to be ministered to Thomas Blyth one of the defts to the complt of William, Lord Howard, include: Were you present when William, Lord Dacre made livery of seisin to Leonard Dacre his son at the castle at Graistocke [Cumberland] & was Willm Middleton present there. From what place did Lord Dacre & Leonard Dacre come that day, who was with them, and where did they each go afterwards. Deponent 27 Apr Anno 33 Eliz: Thomas Blith of Brough Westmorland yeoman
 

Revision as of 12:40, 18 May 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Howrde, George

  • STAC 5/H32/37 - B A Rn C I D - 22 Eliz - George Howrde v Rowland Ludlow, Charles Hibbins, John Broom et al

Howard, Charles

  • STAC 5/H50/21 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard alias Highte v Edmund Sudlow [Ludlow], Owen Bacon et al
  • STAC 5/H12/1 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard v John Helliar et al
  • STAC 5/H72/25 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Howard v Owen Bacon

Howard, Henry (Viscount)

  • STAC 5/H20/3 - B A - 26 Eliz - Henry Viscount Howard v Arthur Gorges, Thomas Turbeville et al
  • STAC 5/H29/11 - I D - 27 Eliz - Henry Viscount Haward v Thomas Turburvile

Howard, Thomas

  • STAC 5/H8/4 - B Dr A Rn Rr - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v John Sherers, Thomas Pynnell, William Beale Sr, John Skull et al
  • STAC 5/H46/32 - I D - 26 Eliz - Thomas Howard v Thomas Pynnel, John Sherer

Howard, Thomas

  • STAC 5/H41/6 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer et al
  • STAC 5/H38/10 - I D - 28 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer et al
  • STAC 5/H10/21 - I D - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howarde v Sir Edward Osborne, William Masham, John Spencer
  • STAC 5/H33/23 - Dr A C - 26 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howarde v Sir Edward Osborne, John Spencer, Richard Yonge et al
  • STAC 5/H6/1 - B I D - Mich 26/27 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Edward Osborne, John Spencer, William Massame, Richard Branden et al

Howard, Thomas

  • STAC 5/H30/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Lord Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al
  • STAC 5/H37/22 - I D - 35 Eliz - Sir Thomas Howard v Robert Beale, William Thorne et al

Howard, William and Elizabeth

  • STAC 5/H5/5 - B A - Mich 30/31 Eliz - Lord William Howard, Elizabeth Howard v George Bell, John Bell, William Milneburne, Thomas Bell et al
  • STAC 5/H68/37 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lady Elizabeth Howard, Lord William Howard v George Bell

Howard, William

  • STAC 5/H31/3 - I D - 25 Eliz - Lord William Howarde v Richard Morrys
  • STAC 5/H34/27 - I D - 26 Eliz - William Lord Howard v William Archam et al
  • STAC 5/H13/24 - C I D - 26 Eliz - William Lord Howarde v William Acham, John Roper et al
  • STAC 5/H6/25 - B A C I D - Hil 24 Eliz - William Lord Haward v William Acheham, John Morrys, Richard Morrys, John Roper alias Tucker

Howard, William

  • STAC 5/H44/25 - B A Rr C - 31 Eliz - William Lord Howard v Sir Robert Dennis

Howard, William

  • STAC 5/H53/28 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - Lord William Howard v Thomas Blyth

Howard, William

  • STAC 7/3/7 - - - Norfolk - William Lord Howard v John Mulley, George Ramberd, Thomas Gunyon

Notes, Additions and Corrections