Difference between revisions of "STAC Holmes"

From Waalt
(5/A37/5)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
*STAC 5/H37/25 - B - 23 Eliz - Richard Holme v George Pyes, Humphrey Hunt et al
 
*STAC 5/H37/25 - B - 23 Eliz - Richard Holme v George Pyes, Humphrey Hunt et al
 
*STAC 5/H74/39 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Holmes, Edward Smith et al v Edmund Snape et al
 
*STAC 5/H74/39 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Holmes, Edward Smith et al v Edmund Snape et al
*STAC 5/H47/24 - B A Dr - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhead, Henry Lane et al
+
*STAC 5/H47/24 - B A Dr - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhead, Henry Lane et al  
 
*STAC 5/H25/33 - I D - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhed
 
*STAC 5/H25/33 - I D - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhed
 
*STAC 5/H25/12 - B - 38 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Richard Holmes, William Lowe et al
 
*STAC 5/H25/12 - B - 38 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Richard Holmes, William Lowe et al
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
''' Attorney General '''  
 
''' Attorney General '''  
*STAC 5/A58/10 - B - - AG v Robert Holmes, James Elersall et al
+
*STAC 5/A58/10 - B - -  Lancashire - AG v Robert Holmes, James Elersall et al
  
 
''' Almoner'''
 
''' Almoner'''
Line 32: Line 32:
 
*STAC 5/A9/34 - I D - 14 Eliz - Almoner v John Holmes
 
*STAC 5/A9/34 - I D - 14 Eliz - Almoner v John Holmes
 
*STAC 5/A3/7 - B A Rr I D - 31 Eliz - Northumberland - Almoner v Robert Holme, William Carre, Robert Bates  
 
*STAC 5/A3/7 - B A Rr I D - 31 Eliz - Northumberland - Almoner v Robert Holme, William Carre, Robert Bates  
*STAC 5/A37/5 - B - 31 Eliz - Almoner v Robert Helme, William Carr  
+
*STAC 5/A37/5 - B - 31 Eliz - Northumberland - Almoner v Robert Helme, William Carr  
 +
 
 +
''' Bevan Case Index '''
 +
*Holmes v Barnes - STAC 5/H64/15, STAC 5/H39/21
 +
*Holmes v Bromhead - STAC 5/H47/24, STAC 5/H25/33
 +
*Holmes v Gascoigne - STAC 7/3/5
 +
*Holmes v Holmes - STAC 5/H25/12, STAC 5/H60/37, STAC 5/H63/33, STAC 5/H1/12, STAC 5/H3/27, STAC 5/H60/3, STAC 5/H66/9, STAC 5/H68/6, STAC 5/H72/35
 +
*Holmes v Kybbonsone - STAC 5/H4/10, STAC 5/H35/2
 +
*Holmes v Paxford - STAC 7/23/48 see [[STAC Hulmes]]
 +
*Holmes v Pyes - STAC 5/H37/25
 +
*Holmes v Reynolds - STAC 5/H26/16, STAC 5/H77/32, STAC 5/H10/1, STAC 5/H10/14, STAC 5/H10/26, STAC 5/H15/28 see [[STAC Hulmes]]
 +
*Holmes v Trafford - STAC 5/H35/28 see [[STAC Hulmes]]
 +
*Holmes v Wardley - STAC 5/H70/26, STAC 5/H30/26 see [[STAC Hoome]]
 +
*Holmes v Watts - STAC 5/H65/14, STAC 7/23/47 see [[STAC Hulmes]]
 +
*Holmes v Wright - STAC 5/H44/4, STAC 5/H45/37 see [[STAC Hulmes]]
 +
*Queen's Almoner v Helme - STAC 5/A37/5
 +
*Queen's Almoner v Holmes - STAC 5/A2/29, STAC 5/A3/7, STAC 5/A9/34
 +
*Attorney General v Holmes - STAC 5/A58/10
 +
*Attorney General and Holmes v Snape - STAC 5/H74/39
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
Line 39: Line 57:
 
*STAC 7/3/5 - TNA Notes: Doncaster: Affray on the bridge
 
*STAC 7/3/5 - TNA Notes: Doncaster: Affray on the bridge
 
*STAC 5/A37/5 - Robert Helme of Tynemouth, Northumberland & Thomas Bates of Prudhewe [Prudhoe], Northumberland. £800 bond to the late Earl of Northumberland who became felo de se in the Tower of London.(dk)
 
*STAC 5/A37/5 - Robert Helme of Tynemouth, Northumberland & Thomas Bates of Prudhewe [Prudhoe], Northumberland. £800 bond to the late Earl of Northumberland who became felo de se in the Tower of London.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/A58/10 - Manchester

Revision as of 19:35, 20 February 2018

Holmes, Joan

  • STAC 7/3/5 - - - Yorkshire - Joan Holmes v Sir William Gascoygne et Thomas et Francis filij et al

Holmes, Richard

  • STAC 5/H37/25 - B - 23 Eliz - Richard Holme v George Pyes, Humphrey Hunt et al
  • STAC 5/H74/39 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Holmes, Edward Smith et al v Edmund Snape et al
  • STAC 5/H47/24 - B A Dr - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhead, Henry Lane et al
  • STAC 5/H25/33 - I D - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhed
  • STAC 5/H25/12 - B - 38 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Richard Holmes, William Lowe et al
  • STAC 5/H60/37 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Richard Holmes Sr, Margaret Tayler
  • STAC 5/H60/3 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v William Lowe, Margaret Tailer et al
  • STAC 5/H3/27 - A - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v William Law
  • STAC 5/H72/35 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Richard Holme v John Lafeild
  • STAC 5/H68/6 - I D - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v William Lawn
  • STAC 5/H63/33 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Richard Holme v William Holme, Henry Guy et al
  • STAC 5/H66/9 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Richard Holme v Bryan Ferrar, William Holme
  • STAC 5/H1/12 - I D - 40 Eliz - Richard Holme v William Holme, Bryan Farrer, Humphrey Robinson alias Harrison

Holmes, Thomas

  • STAC 5/H64/15 - B A Rn Rr - 31 Eliz - Thomas Holmes v William Barnes, Thomas Hussy et al
  • STAC 5/H39/21 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Holmes v Thomas Hussey, William Barnes et al

Holme, William

  • STAC 5/H4/10 - B A - 37 Eliz - William Holme v John Kybbonsone, John Layffyld
  • STAC 5/H35/2 - I D - 38 Eliz - William Holme v John Hayffyld et al

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A58/10 - B - - Lancashire - AG v Robert Holmes, James Elersall et al

Almoner

  • STAC 5/A2/29 - B A - 14 Eliz - Suffolk - Almoner v John Holmes
  • STAC 5/A9/34 - I D - 14 Eliz - Almoner v John Holmes
  • STAC 5/A3/7 - B A Rr I D - 31 Eliz - Northumberland - Almoner v Robert Holme, William Carre, Robert Bates
  • STAC 5/A37/5 - B - 31 Eliz - Northumberland - Almoner v Robert Helme, William Carr

Bevan Case Index

  • Holmes v Barnes - STAC 5/H64/15, STAC 5/H39/21
  • Holmes v Bromhead - STAC 5/H47/24, STAC 5/H25/33
  • Holmes v Gascoigne - STAC 7/3/5
  • Holmes v Holmes - STAC 5/H25/12, STAC 5/H60/37, STAC 5/H63/33, STAC 5/H1/12, STAC 5/H3/27, STAC 5/H60/3, STAC 5/H66/9, STAC 5/H68/6, STAC 5/H72/35
  • Holmes v Kybbonsone - STAC 5/H4/10, STAC 5/H35/2
  • Holmes v Paxford - STAC 7/23/48 see STAC Hulmes
  • Holmes v Pyes - STAC 5/H37/25
  • Holmes v Reynolds - STAC 5/H26/16, STAC 5/H77/32, STAC 5/H10/1, STAC 5/H10/14, STAC 5/H10/26, STAC 5/H15/28 see STAC Hulmes
  • Holmes v Trafford - STAC 5/H35/28 see STAC Hulmes
  • Holmes v Wardley - STAC 5/H70/26, STAC 5/H30/26 see STAC Hoome
  • Holmes v Watts - STAC 5/H65/14, STAC 7/23/47 see STAC Hulmes
  • Holmes v Wright - STAC 5/H44/4, STAC 5/H45/37 see STAC Hulmes
  • Queen's Almoner v Helme - STAC 5/A37/5
  • Queen's Almoner v Holmes - STAC 5/A2/29, STAC 5/A3/7, STAC 5/A9/34
  • Attorney General v Holmes - STAC 5/A58/10
  • Attorney General and Holmes v Snape - STAC 5/H74/39

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/A3/7 - Robert Helme of Tynmouth in the county of Northumberland yeoman and Thomas Butes of Prudhewe [Prudhoe] in the County gen' were bound in £800 to the late Earl of Northumberland, and the Earl became felo de se in the Tower of London.
  • STAC 5/A2/29 - William Sturgen at Shelley Suffolk ryding upon a certain Gelding coullor Sorrell baye with a saddle and bridle price 36s 8d in a certain river called Shelley water by misfortune was there drowned, list an value of clothes jewellry etc on him at the time. deodand
  • STAC 7/3/5 - TNA Notes: Doncaster: Affray on the bridge
  • STAC 5/A37/5 - Robert Helme of Tynemouth, Northumberland & Thomas Bates of Prudhewe [Prudhoe], Northumberland. £800 bond to the late Earl of Northumberland who became felo de se in the Tower of London.(dk)
  • STAC 5/A58/10 - Manchester