STAC Heydon

From Rpalmer
Revision as of 14:48, 8 December 2018 by Hgood (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Heydon, Christopher

  • STAC 5/H10/24 - B A Rn Rr C - 13 Eliz - Sir Christopher Heydon v James Rypen, William Holborn, William Thrower et al
  • STAC 5/H22/38 - I D - 14 Eliz - Sir Christopher Heydon v William Holborne, John Edwarde et al
  • STAC 5/H8/21 - B - 35 Eliz - Christopher Heydon v Edmund Stubbs, Thomas Thetford
  • STAC 5/H6/22 - B A Dr C - 44 Eliz - Sir Christopher Heydon v Richard Jenkinson, John Jenkinson, Robert Heyblyn, Robert Dawes

Heydon, Francis

  • STAC 5/H71/12 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 37 Eliz - Francis Heydon v Edward Ewer, Agnes Ewer, Abell Fullwell
  • STAC 5/H22/15 - I D - 37 Eliz - Francis Heydon v Abel Fullwood, Edward Ewer
  • STAC 5/H14/12 - I D - 37 Eliz - Francis Heydon v Agnes Ewer, Edward Ewer et al

Haydon, George

  • STAC 5/H61/14 - A - - George Haydon v John Ellyott, William England et al

Heydon, John

  • STAC 5/H44/11 - B A - 31 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Rogers, Thomas Good et al
  • STAC 5/H62/7 - I D - 31 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Good
  • STAC 5/H22/5 - C I D - 32 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Goods, Thomas Rogers
  • STAC 5/H41/2 - I D - 32 Eliz - John Haydon v Thomas Good, Thomas Rogers
  • STAC 5/H60/19 - I D - 32 Eliz - John Heidon v Thomas Rogers
  • STAC 5/H38/7 - I D - 34 Eliz - John Heydon v Angelo Dei
  • STAC 5/H13/36 - I D - 38 Eliz - John Heydon v Hugh Throckmorton et al
  • STAC 5/H46/20 - Rn I D - 39 Eliz - John Hayden v Hugh Thornton, Thomas Good et al
  • STAC 5/H29/31 - B A D - 38 Eliz - John Heydon v John Sampson
  • STAC 5/H22/30 - I D - 38 Eliz - John Heydon v Roger Sampson et al
  • STAC 5/H49/4 - B A Dr - 40 Eliz - John Hadon v Thomas Good, Thomas Symons
  • STAC 5/H75/22 - I D - 40 Eliz - John Heydon v John Sampson, Thomas Good et al
  • STAC 5/H11/6 - D - 40 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Good
  • STAC 5/H70/2 - Rn - 41 Eliz - John Hendon v Thomas Good, John Sanson et al
  • STAC 5/H73/30 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Heydon v John Sampson
  • STAC 5/H64/14 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Heydon v John Sampson
  • STAC 5/H38/26 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Good
  • STAC 5/H39/6 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Hoydon v Thomas Good
  • STAC 5/H34/3 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Heydon v John Sampson
  • STAC 5/H21/12 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Good et al
  • STAC 5/H17/31 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Symons
  • STAC 5/H18/37 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Good, John Sampsons et al
  • STAC 5/H47/15 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Heydon v Edward Smith, John Sampson
  • STAC 5/H57/13 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Heyden v John Samson
  • STAC 5/H55/40 - Rr - 41 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Symonds
  • STAC 5/H13/9 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Good et al
  • STAC 5/H9/33 - I D - 41 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Good, John Sampson et al
  • STAC 5/H22/26 - I D - 42 Eliz - John Heydon v Thomas Good, William Sampson et al
  • STAC 5/H76/4 - I D - 42 Eliz - John Heydon v John Sampson

Heydon, Nicholas

  • STAC 5/H70/12 - B A - 33 Eliz - Nicholas Heydon v Reignold Heynes, John Dixhill
  • STAC 5/H81/25 - Rn - 33 Eliz - Nicholas Haydon v Reynold Heynes, Thomas Meston

Heydon, Ralph

  • STAC 5/H53/35 - B A Rn Rr - - STAC co Hertford - Ralph Haden, James Bonner, Margaret Bonner v John Astwyck, William Hunt, et al
  • STAC 5/H18/24 - I D - 9 Eliz - Hertfordshire - Ralph Heydon, John Bonner et uxor v John Astwick, John Hawkins et al
  • STAC 5/H18/15 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - Ralph Heydon v Richard Fortman, Edward Fortman, Ursula Cooke et al
  • STAC 5/H45/20 - I D - 32 Eliz - Ralph Heydon v Richard Fortman
  • STAC 5/H74/2 - B A - - Ralf Heydon v John Staine, William Rigall et al

Haydon, Thomas

  • STAC 5/H33/16 - C I D - 1 Eliz - Thomas Haydon v John Haydon et al
  • STAC 5/H49/27 - B A - 17 Eliz - Thomas Haydon, Christopher Roper v Richard Calmadey, Richard York et al
  • STAC 5/H78/16 - I D - 18 Eliz - Thomas Heydon, Christopher Roper v John Temperance, Philip Newbolde
  • STAC 5/H59/30 - B A - 18 Eliz - Thomas Hayden, Christopher Roper v John Danby
  • STAC 5/H80/13 - Rn - - Thomas Haidon, Christopher Roper v John Danbye
  • STAC 5/H9/15 - I D - 37 Eliz - Thomas [but see Francis] Heydon v Agnes Ewer, Edward Ewer, John Whatley, Abel Fulwood

Bevan Case Index

  • Heydon v Astwick - STAC 5/H53/35, STAC 5/H18/24
  • Heydon v Calmady - STAC 5/H49/27, STAC 5/H78/16
  • Heydon v Danby - STAC 5/H59/30, STAC 5/H80/13
  • Heydon v Eliot - STAC 5/H61/14
  • Heydon v Ewer - STAC 5/H71/12, STAC 5/H14/12, STAC 5/H22/15, STAC 5/H9/15
  • Heydon v Fortman - STAC 5/H18/15, STAC 5/H45/20
  • Heydon v Good - STAC 5/H29/31, STAC 5/H49/4, STAC 5/H9/33, STAC 5/H11/6, STAC 5/H13/9, STAC 5/H17/31, STAC 5/H18/37, STAC 5/H21/12, STAC 5/H22/26, STAC 5/H22/30, STAC 5/H34/3, STAC 5/H38/26, STAC 5/H39/6, STAC 5/H47/15, STAC 5/H55/40, STAC 5/H57/13, STAC 5/H64/14, STAC 5/H70/2, STAC 5/H73/30, STAC 5/H75/22, STAC 5/H76/4
  • Heydon v Haynes - STAC 5/H70/12, STAC 5/H81/25
  • Heydon v Heydon - STAC 5/H33/16
  • Heydon v Holborn - STAC 5/H10/24, STAC 5/H22/38
  • Heydon v Jenkinson - STAC 5/H6/22
  • Heydon v Rogers - STAC 5/H44/11, STAC 5/H22/5, STAC 5/H38/7, STAC 5/H41/2, STAC 5/H60/19, STAC 5/H62/7
  • Heydon v Sampson - STAC 5/H13/36, STAC 5/H46/20
  • Heydon v Staine - STAC 5/H74/2
  • Heydon v Stubbs - STAC 5/H8/21

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/H53/35 - Copyhold land of the manor of the parsonage of Flamstead co Hertford
  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 67v. Ambodextrie and practice. Haydon, armiger, plaintiff; Goodge, defendant: an attorney in the King’s Bench who sued out a latitat for one Chambers against the plaintiff and yet the next term after appeared as attorney for the plaintiff at the return of the process and drew the declaration for Chambers and to colour the matter caused one Dawtry to appear for Chambers and to set his hand to the declaration and the cause continued 4 terms after that and then it was agreed betwixt the parties and part of the money paid in hand and the rest the said Goodge underwent and promised to pay for *Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 68r. the said Heydon, upon renewing a statute for payment thereof, and thereupon persuaded Heydon not to make any proviso, nor to sell his stock to raise the money and yet contrary to his promise the next term after pleaded non sum informat, having no warrant so to do, and thereupon presently himself entered judgment, and made forth execution by firm. fac. against the plaintiff whereby the sheriff seized at the plaintiff’s goods and stock and sold them at underrates, which practise and double dealing the defendant excused by saying that he was both clerk and attorney in the King’s Bench and might therefore lawfully (as the usage there was) draw the declaration, although he were for the defendant, and enter the judgment which the court utterly condemned and fined him £200 and put him from his practice and to make satisfaction to the plaintiff. Michaelmas 38 & 39 Elizabeth (kk)