Difference between revisions of "STAC Haywood"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Haywood, John ''' | ''' Haywood, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H49/12 - B A - 25 Eliz - John Haywood v Philip Mills, William Scott et al | *STAC 5/H49/12 - B A - 25 Eliz - John Haywood v Philip Mills, William Scott et al | ||
− | ''' Haywood, Richard | + | ''' Haywood, Richard ‘'' |
*STAC 5/H25/4 - C I D - 3 Eliz - Richard Heywood v Richard Lawley | *STAC 5/H25/4 - C I D - 3 Eliz - Richard Heywood v Richard Lawley | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
− | *STAC 7/1/7 - - - Yorkshire - AG (Edward Coke) v Fabian Heywood, John Beckwith Sr, John Beckwith Jr, Gilbert Anderson, et al | + | *STAC 7/1/7 - - - Yorkshire NR - AG (Edward Coke) v Fabian Heywood, John Beckwith Sr, John Beckwith Jr, Gilbert Anderson, et al |
+ | **see [[STAC co York NR]] | ||
− | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
− |
Revision as of 09:15, 16 May 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Haywood, John
- STAC 5/H49/12 - B A - 25 Eliz - John Haywood v Philip Mills, William Scott et al
' Haywood, Richard ‘
- STAC 5/H25/4 - C I D - 3 Eliz - Richard Heywood v Richard Lawley
Attorney General
- STAC 7/1/7 - - - Yorkshire NR - AG (Edward Coke) v Fabian Heywood, John Beckwith Sr, John Beckwith Jr, Gilbert Anderson, et al
- see STAC co York NR
Notes, Additions and Corrections