Difference between revisions of "STAC Hale"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
''' Hales, Charles '''
 
''' Hales, Charles '''
 
*STAC 5/H37/30 - B A C I D - 12 Eliz - Charles Hales v Sir Fulke Grewyn [Greville]  
 
*STAC 5/H37/30 - B A C I D - 12 Eliz - Charles Hales v Sir Fulke Grewyn [Greville]  
 +
 +
''' Hales, Charles '''
 
*STAC 5/H65/40 - B A Rn C I D - 24 Eliz - Charles Hales v Richard Denton, Robert Everett et al
 
*STAC 5/H65/40 - B A Rn C I D - 24 Eliz - Charles Hales v Richard Denton, Robert Everett et al
 
*STAC 5/H30/6 - C I D - 24 Eliz - Charles Hales v Robert Everard, Richard Denton et al
 
*STAC 5/H30/6 - C I D - 24 Eliz - Charles Hales v Robert Everard, Richard Denton et al
Line 25: Line 27:
 
*STAC 5/H33/18 - I D - 3 Eliz - Edward Hales v William Crowche
 
*STAC 5/H33/18 - I D - 3 Eliz - Edward Hales v William Crowche
 
*STAC 5/H20/32 - C I D - 3 Eliz - Edward Hales, John Willes v William Crowche
 
*STAC 5/H20/32 - C I D - 3 Eliz - Edward Hales, John Willes v William Crowche
 +
 +
''' Hale Edward '''
 
*STAC 5/H53/17 - B A - 17 Eliz - Edward Hale v Thomas Elcock, James Nycotts, et al
 
*STAC 5/H53/17 - B A - 17 Eliz - Edward Hale v Thomas Elcock, James Nycotts, et al
 
*STAC 5/H57/33 - I D - 15 Eliz - Edward Hail v John Nicholls, George Langley
 
*STAC 5/H57/33 - I D - 15 Eliz - Edward Hail v John Nicholls, George Langley
Line 37: Line 41:
 
*STAC 5/H23/12 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Hale v John Fittz, John Coo et al
 
*STAC 5/H23/12 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Hale v John Fittz, John Coo et al
 
*STAC 7/23/1 - - - John Hale v John Fites et al
 
*STAC 7/23/1 - - - John Hale v John Fites et al
*STAC 5/H60/5 - B A Dr C I D - 39 Eliz - John Hale, John Powell v Roger Richard ap Watkin, Robert Vaughan et al
 
 
*STAC 5/H75/19 - I D - - John Hale v William Puller, Henry Cooke et al
 
*STAC 5/H75/19 - I D - - John Hale v William Puller, Henry Cooke et al
 +
 +
''' Hale, John '''
 +
*STAC 5/H60/5 - B A Dr C I D - 39 Eliz - Radnor - John Hale, John Powell v Roger Richard ap Watkin, Robert Vaughan et al
 +
**see also [[STAC co Radnor]]
  
 
''' Hale, John '''
 
''' Hale, John '''
Line 63: Line 70:
 
''' Almoner'''
 
''' Almoner'''
 
*STAC 5/A43/1 - I D - 39 Eliz - Almoner v Francis Hale, John Blett, Thomas Bruer
 
*STAC 5/A43/1 - I D - 39 Eliz - Almoner v Francis Hale, John Blett, Thomas Bruer
 
''' Bevan Case Index '''
 
*Hales v Adams - STAC 5/H32/1, STAC 5/H78/38 see [[STAC Halse]]
 
*Hales v Bater - STAC 5/H7/32 see [[STAC Hals]]
 
*Hales v Bawden - STAC 5/H75/8, STAC 5/H12/6, STAC 5/H80/9 see [[STAC Hals]]
 
*Hales v Brooke - STAC 5/H46/23, STAC 5/H73/11
 
*Hales v Clare - STAC 5/H61/3, STAC 5/H36/22
 
*Hales v Collins - STAC 5/H3/14, STAC 5/H27/10 see [[STAC Hals]]
 
*Hales v Crouch - STAC 5/H74/12, STAC 5/H20/32, STAC 5/H33/18
 
*Hales v Denton - STAC 5/H65/40, STAC 5/H30/6, STAC 5/H73/29
 
*Hales v Dring - STAC 5/H62/31
 
*Hales v Elcock - STAC 5/H53/17
 
*Hales v Fitz - STAC 5/H6/29, STAC 5/H23/12, STAC 5/H44/1, STAC 7/23/1
 
*Hales v Greville - STAC 5/H37/30
 
*Hales v Hales - STAC 5/H25/6, STAC 5/H12/24, STAC 5/H73/33
 
*Hales v Hart - STAC 5/H52/26, STAC 5/H1/9, STAC 5/H42/23, STAC 5/H47/8, STAC 5/H68/1, STAC 5/H78/43 see [[STAC Halse]]
 
*Hales v Holgrave - STAC 5/H60/23, STAC 5/H41/10, STAC 5/H76/10, STAC 5/H80/16
 
*Hales v Hussey - STAC 5/H60/38
 
*Hales v Lee - STAC 5/H61/18, STAC 5/H13/25, STAC 5/H14/30, STAC 5/H18/36, STAC 5/H19/4, STAC 5/H24/13, STAC 5/H24/16
 
*Hales v Nicholls - STAC 5/H57/33
 
*Hales v Puller - STAC 5/H75/19
 
*Hales v Sturte - STAC 5/H73/39 see [[STAC Hals]]
 
*Hales v Watkins - STAC 5/H60/5
 
*Queen's Almoner v Hales - STAC 5/A43/1
 
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
*STAC 7/3/1 - TNA Notes: Oakley: Forcible entry into a meadow, assault on plaintiff's family, and seizure of hay
 
*STAC 7/3/1 - TNA Notes: Oakley: Forcible entry into a meadow, assault on plaintiff's family, and seizure of hay
 
*STAC 5/H74/12 - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 12r. Perjury adjudged upon a defendant examined in open court without bill or other information. Hales, plaintiff; Crouch and Buckle, defendants: perjury in the defendant Buckle being examined in open court at the hearing of a cause for riot and other misdemeanor in denying the offence, which stood proved against him therein; for this perjury of his he was committed and to stand on the pillory with paper, without bill or other grounds. Michaelmas 3 Eliz. (kk).
 
*STAC 5/H74/12 - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 12r. Perjury adjudged upon a defendant examined in open court without bill or other information. Hales, plaintiff; Crouch and Buckle, defendants: perjury in the defendant Buckle being examined in open court at the hearing of a cause for riot and other misdemeanor in denying the offence, which stood proved against him therein; for this perjury of his he was committed and to stand on the pillory with paper, without bill or other grounds. Michaelmas 3 Eliz. (kk).

Latest revision as of 10:29, 3 September 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Hales, Alice

  • STAC 5/H60/23 - B - - Alice Hales v Margaret Holgrave, Humphrey Gosling
  • STAC 5/H41/10 - A Rn - 16 Eliz - Alice Hales v Margaret Halligane, Humfry Godlynge
  • STAC 5/H80/16 - Rr - - Alice Hailes v Margaret Holigrave, Humfry Goslinge
  • STAC 5/H76/10 - D - 17 Eliz - Alice Hales v Edward Jones, Thomas Langham

Hale, Bartholomew

Hales, Charles

  • STAC 5/H37/30 - B A C I D - 12 Eliz - Charles Hales v Sir Fulke Grewyn [Greville]

Hales, Charles

  • STAC 5/H65/40 - B A Rn C I D - 24 Eliz - Charles Hales v Richard Denton, Robert Everett et al
  • STAC 5/H30/6 - C I D - 24 Eliz - Charles Hales v Robert Everard, Richard Denton et al
  • STAC 5/H73/29 - I - 24 Eliz - Charles Hales v John Everard

Hale, Christopher

  • STAC 5/H60/38 - B - 24 Eliz - Christopher Hale v Thomas Hussey, Ralph Bussey

Hale Edward

  • STAC 5/H74/12 - B A - 13 Eliz - Edward Hales v William Crowch, Roger Wilson et al
  • STAC 5/H33/18 - I D - 3 Eliz - Edward Hales v William Crowche
  • STAC 5/H20/32 - C I D - 3 Eliz - Edward Hales, John Willes v William Crowche

Hale Edward

  • STAC 5/H53/17 - B A - 17 Eliz - Edward Hale v Thomas Elcock, James Nycotts, et al
  • STAC 5/H57/33 - I D - 15 Eliz - Edward Hail v John Nicholls, George Langley
  • STAC 7/3/1 - moved to STAC Harte

Hale, John

  • STAC 5/H25/6 - B A - 24 Eliz - John Hale v John Hale Sr
  • STAC 5/H12/24 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Hale v John Hale Sr
  • STAC 5/H73/33 - D - 24 Eliz - John Hale v Roger Hale
  • STAC 5/H6/29 - B A - Hil 24 Eliz - John Hale v John Fitts, John Coo, Hugh Barker, George Greene
  • STAC 5/H44/1 - Rr C I D - 25 Eliz - John Hale v John Fitz et al
  • STAC 5/H23/12 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Hale v John Fittz, John Coo et al
  • STAC 7/23/1 - - - John Hale v John Fites et al
  • STAC 5/H75/19 - I D - - John Hale v William Puller, Henry Cooke et al

Hale, John

  • STAC 5/H60/5 - B A Dr C I D - 39 Eliz - Radnor - John Hale, John Powell v Roger Richard ap Watkin, Robert Vaughan et al

Hale, John

  • STAC 5/H46/23 - B A - 40 Eliz - Shropshire - John Hale v Edward Brook, William Wilkes et al
  • STAC 5/H73/11 - I D - 41 Eliz - Shropshire - John Hale v Edward Brooke

Hale, Richard

  • STAC 5/H61/18 - B A - 40 Eliz - Richard Hale v Richard Lea, John Humble
  • STAC 5/H24/13 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Richard Hale v Richard Lea, David Austen et al
  • STAC 5/H18/36 - I D - 40 Eliz - Richard Hale v Richard Lea, David Austyn
  • STAC 5/H19/4 - I D - 40 Eliz - Richard Hale v John Humble
  • STAC 5/H14/30 - I D - 40 Eliz - Richard Hale v Richard Lea, David Austen et al
  • STAC 5/H13/25 - I D - 40 Eliz - Richard Hale v Richard Lea et al
  • STAC 5/H24/16 - C I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Hale v Richard Lea, David Austen et al

Hale, Thomas

  • STAC 5/H62/31 - B - 20 Eliz - Roger Hale v Robert Dringe, Thomas Boys et al

Hale, Thomas

  • STAC 5/H61/3 - B A Rn Rr - 39 Eliz - Thomas Hale v Robert Clare
  • STAC 5/H36/22 - I D - 29 Eliz - Thomas Hale v Robert Clare

Almoner

  • STAC 5/A43/1 - I D - 39 Eliz - Almoner v Francis Hale, John Blett, Thomas Bruer

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 7/3/1 - TNA Notes: Oakley: Forcible entry into a meadow, assault on plaintiff's family, and seizure of hay
  • STAC 5/H74/12 - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 12r. Perjury adjudged upon a defendant examined in open court without bill or other information. Hales, plaintiff; Crouch and Buckle, defendants: perjury in the defendant Buckle being examined in open court at the hearing of a cause for riot and other misdemeanor in denying the offence, which stood proved against him therein; for this perjury of his he was committed and to stand on the pillory with paper, without bill or other grounds. Michaelmas 3 Eliz. (kk).