Difference between revisions of "STAC Grinder"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Grynder, William '''
 
''' Grynder, William '''
 
*STAC 5/G7/13 - D - 4 Eliz - Surrey, Kent - William Grynder v William Lydgert
 
*STAC 5/G7/13 - D - 4 Eliz - Surrey, Kent - William Grynder v William Lydgert
 
*STAC 5/G1/19 - B A Rn I D - 4 Eliz - Surrey, Kent - William Grynder v William Lidyeart
 
*STAC 5/G1/19 - B A Rn I D - 4 Eliz - Surrey, Kent - William Grynder v William Lidyeart
*STAC 5/Z1/14 - D - 5 Eliz - - Surrey, Kent - ? v William Lygeart
+
*STAC 5/Z1/14 - D - 5 Eliz - Surrey - Grynder v William Lygeart  
 
+
**see [[STAC co Surrey]] and [[STAC co Kent]]
'''Bevan Case Index '''
+
*Grinder v Lydyate - STAC 5/G1/19, STAC 5/G7/13
+
  
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
*Southwark
+
*STAC 5/G1/19 - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 22v. A falsehood and practice in causing 2 to be hanged instead of rebels adjudged to be hanged whereby they escaped. William Grinder, plaintiff; William Lidgett, defendant, convicted for his falsehood and practice in causing 2 others to be hanged instead of Christopher Waters and Thomas Taylor, two notable rebels adjudged to be hanged for the rebellion in Kent, fined at £40, Fleet and bound to answer to the law for it. Hillary 5 Elizabeth (kk)
+

Latest revision as of 07:50, 12 May 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Grynder, William

  • STAC 5/G7/13 - D - 4 Eliz - Surrey, Kent - William Grynder v William Lydgert
  • STAC 5/G1/19 - B A Rn I D - 4 Eliz - Surrey, Kent - William Grynder v William Lidyeart
  • STAC 5/Z1/14 - D - 5 Eliz - Surrey - Grynder v William Lygeart

Notes, Additions and Corrections