Difference between revisions of "STAC Fryer"
From Waalt
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Fryer, Alexander ''' | ''' Fryer, Alexander ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F21/16 - B - 38 Eliz - Alexander Fryer v John Fryer, John Stockman et al | *STAC 5/F21/16 - B - 38 Eliz - Alexander Fryer v John Fryer, John Stockman et al | ||
Line 10: | Line 14: | ||
*STAC 5/F19/16 - I D - - Agnes Fryer v John Warren | *STAC 5/F19/16 - I D - - Agnes Fryer v John Warren | ||
*STAC 5/F14/14 - I D - 31 Eliz - Agnes Fryer v Geoffery Spynke, John Dale | *STAC 5/F14/14 - I D - 31 Eliz - Agnes Fryer v Geoffery Spynke, John Dale | ||
+ | *STAC 5/F25/6 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Elizabeth Fryer v John Warren, Jeffry Spynck et al | ||
''' Fryers, Edmund ''' | ''' Fryers, Edmund ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F3/8 - B - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v Robert Sylvester | *STAC 5/F3/8 - B - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v Robert Sylvester | ||
− | * | + | **see [[STAC co Oxford]] |
− | |||
− | |||
− | *STAC | ||
− | ''' | + | ''' Fryers, Edmund ''' |
− | *STAC 5/ | + | *STAC 5/F23/37 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch et al |
+ | *STAC 5/F28/7 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v John Yate, Richard Palmer et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/F6/2 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v James Hiche, Richard Palmer et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/F1/13 - I D C - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch, Richard Palmer, Edward Joyes, Thomas Everett | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co Oxford]] | ||
''' Fryer, Cecily & Humfry ''' | ''' Fryer, Cecily & Humfry ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/F25/12 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Cecily Fryer, Humfry Fryer v William Bishop of St Asaph, Piers Knowlesly et al | + | *STAC 5/F25/12 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Denbigh - Cecily Fryer, Humfry Fryer v William Bishop of St Asaph, Piers Knowlesly et al |
+ | **see [[STAC co Denbigh]] | ||
''' Fryer, Germain ''' | ''' Fryer, Germain ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F11/7 - B A - 29 Eliz - London - German Fryer v William Worthington, Walter Agar et al | *STAC 5/F11/7 - B A - 29 Eliz - London - German Fryer v William Worthington, Walter Agar et al | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co London]] | ||
''' Fryer, Humphrey ''' | ''' Fryer, Humphrey ''' | ||
Line 36: | Line 44: | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al | + | *STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al |
− | *STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - AG v Anthony Fryer | + | *STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer |
*STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford | *STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford | ||
− | *STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - - AG v Anthony Frise | + | *STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Frise |
− | + | **see [[STAC co Norfolk]] | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | |||
− | * | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
− | * | + | *Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 41r. Forging and altering of court rolls concerning certain customs. Fryer, plaintiff; Fryer, defendant: for forgery and altering of certain court rolls concerning certain customs of the manor of Temple Wycombe which was dismissed for want of sufficient proof. Michaelmas 27 Elizabeth (kk) |
− |
Revision as of 09:48, 16 August 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Fryer, Alexander
- STAC 5/F21/16 - B - 38 Eliz - Alexander Fryer v John Fryer, John Stockman et al
Fryer Anthony
- STAC 5/F19/8 - B A - 39 Eliz - Anthony Fryer v Richard Astely et al
Fryer, Agnes
- STAC 5/F15/39 - I D - - Agnes Fyer v Thomas Frost, William Frost
- STAC 5/F27/33 - I D - 32 Eliz - Agnes Fryer v John Warren et al
- STAC 5/F19/16 - I D - - Agnes Fryer v John Warren
- STAC 5/F14/14 - I D - 31 Eliz - Agnes Fryer v Geoffery Spynke, John Dale
- STAC 5/F25/6 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Elizabeth Fryer v John Warren, Jeffry Spynck et al
Fryers, Edmund
- STAC 5/F3/8 - B - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v Robert Sylvester
- see STAC co Oxford
Fryers, Edmund
- STAC 5/F23/37 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch et al
- STAC 5/F28/7 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v John Yate, Richard Palmer et al
- STAC 5/F6/2 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v James Hiche, Richard Palmer et al
- STAC 5/F1/13 - I D C - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch, Richard Palmer, Edward Joyes, Thomas Everett
- see STAC co Oxford
Fryer, Cecily & Humfry
- STAC 5/F25/12 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Denbigh - Cecily Fryer, Humfry Fryer v William Bishop of St Asaph, Piers Knowlesly et al
- see STAC co Denbigh
Fryer, Germain
- STAC 5/F11/7 - B A - 29 Eliz - London - German Fryer v William Worthington, Walter Agar et al
- see STAC co London
Fryer, Humphrey
- STAC 5/F20/26 - B A - 30 Eliz - Humphrey Fryer v John Whitcomb, William Elbright et al
- STAC 5/F22/24 - I D - 30 Eliz - Humphry Fryer v Thomas Kye et al
Fryer, James
- STAC 5/F27/14 - Rn - 43 Eliz - James Fryer v James Thompson, Richard Dewgill et al
- STAC 5/F21/10 - C I D - 43 Eliz - James Fryer v Thomas Hardcastle et al
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
- STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer
- STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford
- STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Frise
- see STAC co Norfolk
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 41r. Forging and altering of court rolls concerning certain customs. Fryer, plaintiff; Fryer, defendant: for forgery and altering of certain court rolls concerning certain customs of the manor of Temple Wycombe which was dismissed for want of sufficient proof. Michaelmas 27 Elizabeth (kk)