Difference between revisions of "STAC Forth"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
''' Fourth, Arthur ''' | ''' Fourth, Arthur ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F25/26 - D - 34 Eliz - Arthur Fourth v John Lewen | *STAC 5/F25/26 - D - 34 Eliz - Arthur Fourth v John Lewen | ||
| Line 5: | Line 9: | ||
*STAC 5/F14/40 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - Edward Forthe v John Stamer, Michael Stamer | *STAC 5/F14/40 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - Edward Forthe v John Stamer, Michael Stamer | ||
| − | ''' Forthe, | + | ''' Forthe, Philologus ''' |
*STAC 5/F25/36 - B A Rn - 33 Eliz - Philologus Forthe, John Webster v John Jakes, Edward Cleves et al | *STAC 5/F25/36 - B A Rn - 33 Eliz - Philologus Forthe, John Webster v John Jakes, Edward Cleves et al | ||
*STAC 5/F21/1 - I D - 33 Eliz - Philologus Foorthe, John Webster v John Jaques, Edward Cleves | *STAC 5/F21/1 - I D - 33 Eliz - Philologus Foorthe, John Webster v John Jaques, Edward Cleves | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Forthe, Philologus ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F2/19 - B - Hil 42 Eliz - Suffolk - Philologus Forth v Edmund Buckingham of Great Thornham Suffolk, Thomas Alderton, John Bradley | *STAC 5/F2/19 - B - Hil 42 Eliz - Suffolk - Philologus Forth v Edmund Buckingham of Great Thornham Suffolk, Thomas Alderton, John Bradley | ||
*STAC 5/F6/14 - I D - 43 Eliz - Suffolk - Philologus Forth v Edmund Bokenham et al | *STAC 5/F6/14 - I D - 43 Eliz - Suffolk - Philologus Forth v Edmund Bokenham et al | ||
*STAC 5/F3/28 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Suffolk - Philologus Forthe v Henry Bokenham, John Bradley, Thomas Alderton et al | *STAC 5/F3/28 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Suffolk - Philologus Forthe v Henry Bokenham, John Bradley, Thomas Alderton et al | ||
| + | **see [[STAC co Suffolk]] | ||
''' Forth, Thomas ''' | ''' Forth, Thomas ''' | ||
| Line 22: | Line 29: | ||
*STAC 7/21/24 - - - William Fourthe v Robert Boyer | *STAC 7/21/24 - - - William Fourthe v Robert Boyer | ||
| − | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 00:14, 11 May 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Fourth, Arthur
- STAC 5/F25/26 - D - 34 Eliz - Arthur Fourth v John Lewen
Forthe, Edward
- STAC 5/F14/40 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - Edward Forthe v John Stamer, Michael Stamer
Forthe, Philologus
- STAC 5/F25/36 - B A Rn - 33 Eliz - Philologus Forthe, John Webster v John Jakes, Edward Cleves et al
- STAC 5/F21/1 - I D - 33 Eliz - Philologus Foorthe, John Webster v John Jaques, Edward Cleves
Forthe, Philologus
- STAC 5/F2/19 - B - Hil 42 Eliz - Suffolk - Philologus Forth v Edmund Buckingham of Great Thornham Suffolk, Thomas Alderton, John Bradley
- STAC 5/F6/14 - I D - 43 Eliz - Suffolk - Philologus Forth v Edmund Bokenham et al
- STAC 5/F3/28 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Suffolk - Philologus Forthe v Henry Bokenham, John Bradley, Thomas Alderton et al
- see STAC co Suffolk
Forth, Thomas
- STAC 5/F15/26 - B A - 42 Eliz - Thomas Forth v John Lightborne
- STAC 5/F28/31 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Thomas Foorth v John Lightborne
- STAC 5/F8/14 - I D - 42 Eliz - Thomas Forthe v John Lightbourne
Forth, William
- STAC 5/F6/33 - I D - 22 Eliz - William Forth v Thomas Bradley
- STAC 5/F7/4 - B A C I D - 33 Eliz - William Forthe v Robert Bellamy, William Williamson et al
- STAC 7/21/24 - - - William Fourthe v Robert Boyer
Notes, Additions and Corrections
