Difference between revisions of "STAC Delahay"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | |||
''' Delahaye, George ''' | ''' Delahaye, George ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/D36/14 - B A R - 40 Eliz - George Delahay v Sir John Scott, Roger Twisden et al | + | *STAC 5/D36/14 - B A R - 40 Eliz - [[STAC co Kent]] - George Delahay v Sir John Scott, Roger Twisden et al |
| − | *STAC 5/D1/6 - I D - 40 Eliz - George Dalahaye v John Pattenden, George Pattenden, Thomas Croppe, Richard Cole, Stephen Pyende, Arthur Francis, Thomas Crohurst | + | *STAC 5/D1/6 - I D - 40 Eliz - Kent - George Dalahaye v John Pattenden, George Pattenden, Thomas Croppe, Richard Cole, Stephen Pyende, Arthur Francis, Thomas Crohurst |
| − | *STAC 5/D9/31 - I D - 40 Eliz - George Delahay v Roger Twisden, William Twisden, John Theobald et al | + | *STAC 5/D9/31 - I D - 40 Eliz - Kent - George Delahay v Roger Twisden, William Twisden, John Theobald et al |
| − | *STAC 5/D9/25 - I D - 40 Eliz - George Delahaye v Sir John Scott et al | + | *STAC 5/D9/25 - I D - 40 Eliz - Kent - George Delahaye v Sir John Scott et al |
''' Delahaye, Henry ''' | ''' Delahaye, Henry ''' | ||
| Line 9: | Line 12: | ||
*STAC 5/D11/19 - I D - 15 Eliz - Henry Delahaye v Valentine Wilson, Henry Atkins et al | *STAC 5/D11/19 - I D - 15 Eliz - Henry Delahaye v Valentine Wilson, Henry Atkins et al | ||
*STAC 5/D20/38 - B A R - 18 Eliz - Henry Delahey v William Lapworth et al | *STAC 5/D20/38 - B A R - 18 Eliz - Henry Delahey v William Lapworth et al | ||
| − | *STAC 5/D39/17 - D - 19 Eliz - | + | *STAC 5/D39/17 - D - 19 Eliz - [[STAC co Warwick]] - Henry Delahaye v Richard Burton |
*STAC 10/2/14 - - - - Henry de la Hay v Richard Burton and Thomas Burberry | *STAC 10/2/14 - - - - Henry de la Hay v Richard Burton and Thomas Burberry | ||
| Line 27: | Line 30: | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
*STAC 10/2/14 TNA note: Stealing livestock. | *STAC 10/2/14 TNA note: Stealing livestock. | ||
| + | *STAC 5/D1/6 - Deponents: George Pattenden, of Clifford's Inn, Middx, gent. Richard Cole, of Watringeburie, Kent, husbandman. John Pattenden, of Wattringeburie, Kent, gent. Arthur Franncis, of Yaldeinge, Kent, gent. Thomas Crowehurste, of Watringeburie, Kent, yeoman. Steven Pyne, of Watringburie, Kent, millard. Thomas Croppe, of Watringebury, Kent, gent. (dk) | ||
Revision as of 17:27, 14 November 2018
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Delahaye, George
- STAC 5/D36/14 - B A R - 40 Eliz - STAC co Kent - George Delahay v Sir John Scott, Roger Twisden et al
- STAC 5/D1/6 - I D - 40 Eliz - Kent - George Dalahaye v John Pattenden, George Pattenden, Thomas Croppe, Richard Cole, Stephen Pyende, Arthur Francis, Thomas Crohurst
- STAC 5/D9/31 - I D - 40 Eliz - Kent - George Delahay v Roger Twisden, William Twisden, John Theobald et al
- STAC 5/D9/25 - I D - 40 Eliz - Kent - George Delahaye v Sir John Scott et al
Delahaye, Henry
- STAC 5/D22/18 - B A Rr Rn - 15 Eliz - Henry Delahaye v Nicholas Castleton, Richard Garret et al
- STAC 5/D11/19 - I D - 15 Eliz - Henry Delahaye v Valentine Wilson, Henry Atkins et al
- STAC 5/D20/38 - B A R - 18 Eliz - Henry Delahey v William Lapworth et al
- STAC 5/D39/17 - D - 19 Eliz - STAC co Warwick - Henry Delahaye v Richard Burton
- STAC 10/2/14 - - - - Henry de la Hay v Richard Burton and Thomas Burberry
Delahaye, Paul
- STAC 5/D17/20 - B C Dr A I D - 44 Eliz - Paule Delahaye, William Powell v Henry Prosser
- STAC 5/D26/31 - I D - 44 Eliz - Paul Delehay, William Powell v Henry Prossen
- STAC 5/D14/37 - D - 44 Eliz - Paul Delahaye v John Arnold
- STAC 5/D21/14 - I D - 44 Eliz - Paul Delahaye v Henry Prosser et al
Bevan Case Index
- Delahaye v Arnold - STAC 5/D14/37
- Delahaye v Castleton - STAC 5/D22/18, STAC 5/D11/19
- Delahaye v Lapworth - STAC 5/D20/38, STAC 5/D39/17
- Delahaye v Prosser - STAC 5/D17/20, STAC 5/D21/14, STAC 5/D26/31
- Delahaye v Scott - STAC 5/D36/14, STAC 5/D1/6, STAC 5/D9/25, STAC 5/D9/31
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 10/2/14 TNA note: Stealing livestock.
- STAC 5/D1/6 - Deponents: George Pattenden, of Clifford's Inn, Middx, gent. Richard Cole, of Watringeburie, Kent, husbandman. John Pattenden, of Wattringeburie, Kent, gent. Arthur Franncis, of Yaldeinge, Kent, gent. Thomas Crowehurste, of Watringeburie, Kent, yeoman. Steven Pyne, of Watringburie, Kent, millard. Thomas Croppe, of Watringebury, Kent, gent. (dk)
