Difference between revisions of "STAC Crooke"
From Waalt
(note 5/C78/8) |
|||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
''' Crooke, Thomas ''' | ''' Crooke, Thomas ''' | ||
*STAC 5/C47/3 - B - 9 Eliz - Thomas Crooke v William Lower, William Walcot et al | *STAC 5/C47/3 - B - 9 Eliz - Thomas Crooke v William Lower, William Walcot et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/C78/8 - John Croke v. John Dinham, George Brome, Reynold Carter, Thomas Baron, William Frannces, Thomas Buckleye, Marke Symons & others (not named). Claims of common, rights to hunt, within a forest claimed to have been disafforested. Location not stated in replication.(dk) |
Revision as of 18:01, 15 October 2016
Crooke, John
- STAC 5/C76/35 - B A Rn Rr - John Crooke v John Townshend, William Powell et al
- STAC 5/C7/34 - I Dn- 7 Eliz - John Croke v William Powell et al
- STAC 5/C20/36 - B - 25 Eliz - John Crooke v John Nott et uxor, John Darte et al
- STAC 5/C78/17 - Rn - John Crooke v Humfrey Radford alias Wescott, John Darte et al
- STAC 5/C6/6 - B A I Dn - 27 Eliz - John Crooke v John Dynham, George Broome, Henry Poole et al
- STAC 5/C78/8 - Rn - John Croke v George Broome, Reynold Carter et al
- STAC 5/C4/31 - C I D - 28 Eliz - John Croke v John Dynham et al
- STAC 5/C55/18 - I D - 27 Eliz - John Croke v George Broome, Reynold Carter et al
- STAC 5/C29/24 - I D - 28 Eliz - John Crooke v John Dinham
- STAC 5/C50/15 - B A Rn C - 27 Eliz - John Crooke v John Nott, John Boyes et al
- STAC 5/C71/22 - B A C - 27 Eliz - John Crooke v William Francis, George Brown et al
- STAC 5/C15/3 - I D - 34 Eliz - John Crooke v John Nott, Matthew Crooke et al
- STAC 5/C32/39 - B Dr - 32 Eliz - John Crooke v Richard Byston
- STAC 5/C6/14 - B Dr - Mich 37/38 Eliz - John Crooke, Michael Crooke v Richard James, Richard Bisson, John Androwse et al
- STAC 5/C22/40 - B A - 37 Eliz - John Crooke v Robert Knapleche, William Knapleche, William Wallop, Thomas Bedford et al
- STAC 5/C9/18 - I D - 37 Eliz - John Crooke Jr v William Wallop et al
- STAC 5/C52/26 - I D - 37 Eliz - John Crooke Jr v William Wallop et al
- STAC 5/C68/32 - A - 37 Eliz - John Crooke v William Stickley, John Crosse
- STAC 5/C54/16 - I - 37 Eliz - John Crooke Jr v William Stickley, John Crosse
- STAC 5/C32/15 - I D - 37 Eliz - John Crooke Sr v Christopher Weeks
- STAC 5/C76/12 - I D - 37 Eliz - John Crooke v William Smithe
- STAC 5/C52/17 - B A - 38 Eliz - [blank] Crook Sr, [blank] Crook Jr v John Andrews, John Crook Sr, John Crook Jr et al
- STAC 5/C68/28 - A - 38 Eliz - John Crooke Sr v John Crooke Jr
- STAC 5/C20/22 - B A - 44 Eliz - John Crooke v Philip Bowden, Matthew Skinner
- STAC 5/C49/35 - I D - 44 Eliz - John Crooke v Matthew Skinner
Crooke, John and Nicholas
- STAC 5/C53/2 - B - 19 Eliz - Nicholas Crooke v. Lawrence Berye
- STAC 5/C21/27 - B A C I D - 21 Eliz - John Crooke, Nicholas Crooke v Laurence Burye, John Burges, Thomas Knolle et al
- STAC 5/C27/11 - A - 21 Eliz - John Crooke, Nicholas Crooke v Michael Bidgood, John Hunt, William Burges et al
Crooke, Robert
- STAC 5/C20/13 - B A - 18 Eliz - Robert Crooke v Andrew Scrope, Robert Scrope et al
- STAC 5/C13/18 - I D - 18 Eliz - Robert Crooke v Adrian Scroop, Robert Scroope et al
Crooke, Thomas
- STAC 5/C47/3 - B - 9 Eliz - Thomas Crooke v William Lower, William Walcot et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 5/C78/8 - John Croke v. John Dinham, George Brome, Reynold Carter, Thomas Baron, William Frannces, Thomas Buckleye, Marke Symons & others (not named). Claims of common, rights to hunt, within a forest claimed to have been disafforested. Location not stated in replication.(dk)