STAC Clere

From Rpalmer
Revision as of 08:40, 27 April 2019 by Hgood (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Clere, Benjamin

  • STAC 5/C70/2 - B A C - 16 Eliz - Benjamin Clere, Robert Mott v Matthew Stephens, John Wood et al
  • STAC 5/C79/30 - Rn - Benjamin Clere Sr, Robert Motte et al v John Lone, John Wood

Clere, Edward

  • STAC 5/C76/33 - B - 3 Eliz - Edward Clere v John Edwards, William Drury et al
  • STAC 5/C4/4 - B A - 26 Eliz - Edward Clere v John Edwards, John Shering, William Drury, Walter Betes et al
  • STAC 5/C81/20 - Rn - Edward Clere v John Edwards, Davye Evance et al
  • STAC 5/C55/22 - I D - 17 Eliz - Edward Clere v John Edwards, Robert Abraham et al
  • STAC 5/C56/38 - B A Rr - 29 Eliz - Sir Edward Clere v John Huggon, John Smith
  • STAC 5/C73/37 - I D - Eliz - Sir Edward Cleere v Thomas Hogan, John Smith et al
  • STAC 5/C57/21 - C I D - 29 Eliz - Sir Edward Clere v John Smyth et al
  • STAC 5/C67/8 - B A - 29 Eliz - Sir Edward Clere v Christopher Fulmestone
  • STAC 5/C48/26 - I D - 29 Eliz - Sir Edward Clere v Thomas Fulmerston, Christopher Fulmerston
  • STAC 5/C62/34 - B A - 29 Eliz - Edward Clere v John Fysher, John Basely
  • STAC 5/C37/2 - I D - 29 Eliz - Sir Edward Clere v John Baseley
  • STAC 5/C67/33 - B - 39 Eliz - Sir Edward Clere v Gilbert Parker, Christopher Langdon et al

Clere, Edward

  • STAC 5/C24/33 - B A C I D - 36 Eliz - Suffolk - Sir Edward Clere v Robert Humston et al
  • STAC 5/C3/35 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Suffolk - Sir Edward Cleare v Robert Huninston, Richard Brooke, Robert Leader, John Boul, Simon Ballard et al
  • STAC 5/C16/5 - I D - 35 Eliz - Suffolk - Sir Edward Clere v Robert Hinaston et al

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
  • STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Cleare
  • STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al

Almoner

  • STAC 5/A56/11 - I D - 31 Eliz - Almoner v Benjamin Clere et al

Bevan Case Index

  • Attorney General v Clare - STAC 5/A32/39, STAC 5/A18/25, STAC 5/A31/29
  • Clare v Baseley - STAC 5/C37/2
  • Clare v Edwards - STAC 5/C4/4, STAC 5/C76/33, STAC 5/C55/22, STAC 5/C81/20
  • Clare v Fisher - STAC 5/C62/34
  • Clare v Fulmerston - STAC 5/C67/8, STAC 5/C48/26
  • Clare v Hogan - STAC 5/C56/38, STAC 5/C57/21, STAC 5/C73/37
  • Clare v Hunston - STAC 5/C24/33, STAC 5/C3/35, STAC 5/C16/5
  • Clare v Johnson - STAC 5/C69/29 STAC Cheere
  • Clare v Parker - STAC 5/C67/33
  • Clare v Stephens - STAC 5/C70/2, STAC 5/C79/30
  • Clare v Vernon - STAC 5/C53/20
  • Queen's Almoner v Clare - STAC 5/A56/11

Notes, Additions and Corrections:

  • See also STAC Clare
  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 30v. The proper name in a subpoena razed out of the label thereof which was mistaken Thomas for William 20s cost. Cleere, plaintiff; Davies, defendant. A subpoena served on the defendant, and the label thereof was razed and his first name left out because they had mistaken the name, Thomas for William, and so the process unduly served for which the defendant had 20s costs and the razure of the same subpoena ordered to be examined. Trinity 17 Elizabeth (kk)