Difference between revisions of "STAC Buller"

From Waalt
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''' Buller, Matthew '''
+
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
*STAC 5/B33/39 - B - 43 Eliz - Matthew Buller v Thomas Wimond, John Bullock, Pafrow Langdon
+
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
  
''' Buller, Philip '''
+
''' Buller, John '''
*STAC 5/B36/8 - A - 17 Eliz - Philip Buller v Geronys Rollestone
+
*STAC 5/B1/38 - B A - 17 Eliz - Somerset - John Bullor v Peter Bale, Robert Burgge, Henry Clausey, John Hawker, Wiliiam Hughes et al
 +
*STAC 5/B81/1 - I D - 18 Eliz - Somerset - John Buller v Alexander Clausey
 +
*STAC 5/B16/7 - I D - 18 Eliz - Somerset - John Buller v Robert Burge
 +
**see [[STAC co Somerset]]
  
 
''' Buller, John '''
 
''' Buller, John '''
 +
*STAC 5/B3/38 - B A Rn Rr - Mich 22/23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, Wiliiam Austen
 
*STAC 5/B88/6 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Denys, William Austen
 
*STAC 5/B88/6 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Denys, William Austen
*STAC 5/B81/1 - I D - 18 Eliz - John Buller v Alexander Clausey
 
 
*STAC 5/B76/40 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austine
 
*STAC 5/B76/40 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austine
 
*STAC 5/B22/1 - C I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin
 
*STAC 5/B22/1 - C I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin
*STAC 5/B16/7 - I D - 18 Eliz - John Buller v Robert Burge
 
 
*STAC 5/B67/32 - I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin
 
*STAC 5/B67/32 - I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin
 +
 +
''' Buller, John '''
 +
*STAC 7/18/72 - - - John Buller v James Hublowe
 +
 +
''' Buller, Matthew '''
 +
*STAC 5/B33/39 - B - 43 Eliz - Matthew Buller v Thomas Wimond, John Bullock, Pafrow Langdon
 +
 +
''' Buller, Philip '''
 +
*STAC 5/B36/8 - A - 17 Eliz - Philip Buller v Geronys Rollestone
 +
 +
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
 +
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 51v. Subpoena to hear judgement not being served personally the plaintiff was directed to publish the serving of it on the house or in the parish church. Buller, plaintiff; Curry, defendant: perjury and the subpoena to hear judgment fixed upon the defendant’s door who made default at the hearing, whereupon the court respited the hearing of the cause until the next term and directed the plaintiff to take out another subpoena and to serve the same personally or else to fix the same on the defendant’s door and afterward to publish the same in the parish church where the defendant dwelleth two several Sundays. Hillary 33 Elizabeth (kk)

Latest revision as of 21:25, 21 June 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Buller, John

  • STAC 5/B1/38 - B A - 17 Eliz - Somerset - John Bullor v Peter Bale, Robert Burgge, Henry Clausey, John Hawker, Wiliiam Hughes et al
  • STAC 5/B81/1 - I D - 18 Eliz - Somerset - John Buller v Alexander Clausey
  • STAC 5/B16/7 - I D - 18 Eliz - Somerset - John Buller v Robert Burge

Buller, John

  • STAC 5/B3/38 - B A Rn Rr - Mich 22/23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, Wiliiam Austen
  • STAC 5/B88/6 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Denys, William Austen
  • STAC 5/B76/40 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austine
  • STAC 5/B22/1 - C I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin
  • STAC 5/B67/32 - I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin

Buller, John

  • STAC 7/18/72 - - - John Buller v James Hublowe

Buller, Matthew

  • STAC 5/B33/39 - B - 43 Eliz - Matthew Buller v Thomas Wimond, John Bullock, Pafrow Langdon

Buller, Philip

  • STAC 5/B36/8 - A - 17 Eliz - Philip Buller v Geronys Rollestone

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 51v. Subpoena to hear judgement not being served personally the plaintiff was directed to publish the serving of it on the house or in the parish church. Buller, plaintiff; Curry, defendant: perjury and the subpoena to hear judgment fixed upon the defendant’s door who made default at the hearing, whereupon the court respited the hearing of the cause until the next term and directed the plaintiff to take out another subpoena and to serve the same personally or else to fix the same on the defendant’s door and afterward to publish the same in the parish church where the defendant dwelleth two several Sundays. Hillary 33 Elizabeth (kk)